Can't handle 16 GB RAM

I bought 16 GB RAM for my 8-Core from Crucial.
Things work fine up to 12 GB (2 GB modules) but it will stall (wheel of death) during boot when I load it with 16 GB.
I switched the modules to make sure something wasn't wrong with the RAM.
Updated the firmware for the machine.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Frederic

I am glad to hear your system is up and running... don't worry about taking off, it isn't (yet) FAA approved!
But it will kick the fans in when the SMC or sensors detect a component like FBDIMM or Riser exceeds its threshold -- especially on a 'wake from sleep' situation. Also, on wake from sleep is when there is the largest power draw for some reason, which can trip circuits or cause problems like an overload.
I would recommend an APC 1500VA for your system, and 1000VA perhaps for everything else.
Moving a display to a wall outlet that the UPS is also on would still of course be on the same circuit, but easing the load on the UPS perhaps enough - - for now.

Similar Messages

I loaded mountain lion and now my computer can't handle video or load iTunes

I loaded mountain lion and now my computer can't handle video or load itunes

4 GB ram
2.4 GH processor
I have 3 topics in the activity monitor running at 9995 Mb real memory
loginwindow = 952 mb
systemUIServer = 950 mb
usereventagent = 940mb
has mountain lion just ate up my ram in operations

Can i upgrade my RAM on a macbook air

I have a 13 inch, first generation Macbook air, and i was wondering how i would go about adding more memory to it

You cannot. The original MBA came with 2 GBs of RAM on the motherboard, and there are no memory slots for expansion. The only way for you to get more RAM is to buy another computer that can handle more RAM.

Brand new MacBook Pro can't handle 720p Video in iMovie?

Well, my Black 2.0 GHz Core Duo MacBook has been replaced by the new 13" 2.26 Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro (I had to pay the difference) and I had it upgraded to 4GB of Ram and a 320GB Hard Drive!
I use a Kodak z1085 IS Digital Camera that records videos in 720p quality. When I import them into iMovie '09, I get this message:
This is the same thing that I got on my Core Duo MacBook. If I did not optimize the video, it would play choppy and could not keep up. On my new MacBook Pro, I still get this message saying that "my computer can't handle it." I can undersatnd my old Core Duo MacBook not being able to handle it, but when a brand new $2000 MacBook Pro can't handle 720p video, somthing has to be wrong here.
Are there cretin specs that indicate what computer can handle what? I'm guessing that this MacBook Pro CAN handle it, but why am I still getting that message? Do I need a $10,000 Mac Pro Tower system to make it happy?
Can anyone please explain this and help me out?
Thanks,
Scott

+Well... for starters, the 2.26GHz MB Pro is not a $2,000 machine.+
Sorry...$1.5 thousand. Still too much for a brand machine that isn't "powerful enough" to run software that came out before the computer did.
+For all intents and purposes, it's an entry level notebook (despite the name "Pro")... with only slightly higher specifications than the white MacBook.+
So its only slightly better then the model that can only handle solitaire or any other basic application? I find it odd Apple would include iLife if these machines can't handle all of the features that they are supposed to. Pro means professional. that means this machine should be able to handle PRO applications like Final Cut, etc. But how can it if it can't even handle iMovie! Not to mention they screwed us out of using the old version...so I am stuck using this version!
+I'm not exactly sure what you mean when you say your black MacBook was replaced by a new 2.26GHz machine... but you had to pay the difference... It sounds like you were perhaps having problems with your MacBook and Apple allowed you to upgrade to the newest version paying something additional. If that's the case, it sounds like they were very generous as you had a first gen MacBook that was about three years old.+
Yes that is exactly what happened. My Black MacBook had many issues. I sent it in for repair three times and even took it to an Apple store when I was on vacation. (don't have any apple stores where I live) All of these repairs did not fix the problems and they kept on coming! So they offered to just replace it. But they don't sell the Black MacBook anymore. Only the white...and I don't like the white (thats why I bought the black!) so that is when they offered me the MacBook Pro if I paid the difference. In which I did. So that is how I got my new MacBook Pro.
+Are you saying that your video plays choppy on your new machine... or just that you get the message stating that it may play poorly?+
Both....It shows that message, and does play somewhat choppy. Not as choppy as the old MacBook though.
Like I said, I'd just like to know what Apple calls "good enough" so it doesn't display that warning.

Safari 3(PC) can't handle double-byte characters

I used Safari to browse a Chinese web site. However, there was a lot of BLANK SPACE coz Safari can't show the Chinese contents. Later, I noticed that Safari can't handle those html content that use non-English for the fontface name. If I change the font-face name to English(still the same Chinese font), Safari can display the content. However, it didn't use the font-face.

I am running a windows xp. It is a microsoft XP professional(5.1 build 2600)
intel celeron 1.1ghz
with a 254mb of ram( that is part of a ram card)
I am not running windows 95 it's just my pc is quite old.
I downloaded the flash player 10 archive nothing else but the 10th version and I installed the newest version it had on there.
If there is a better option please tell me. thanks
edit: i am using mozzilla firefox the newest version of it.
Ok I'd like to say this now I pressumed my pc couldn't handle flash palyer 10.3 since the requirments asked ofr higher specs.
AND right before I tried to install it igot rid of my old flash palyer 10 and adobe flash activex.
After that I tried to install the program for firefox yet after I pressed run NOTHING appeared and firefox was off. I keep getting a error that says it couldn't connect or run a script or something from internet explorer.
I've been having these random script errors latly too.
Yet I have cleared up my pc and recently ran anti-malware, anti-virus, and defragmentaion scans,etc and more. (Avast piriform malwarebytes). SO every tiemi did this the program would run underprocesses but it would do absolutly NOTHING so I end up having to stop the process. Each time itry to install it it deletes it'self orsomthing as well from the file I downloaded it to though i pressume that is normal
Unless my problem lies more in the program then my pc then I'm ok.

Will my "HP Envy m4 Intel core i7-3632QM LAPTOP" handle quad RAM?

Will my windows 8 64 bit "HP Envy m4 Intel core i7-3632QM LAPTOP" handle quad RAM? OR...
I Have a new laptop. I want to get it to it's ultimate performance. I will be computer gaming with it on "Old Republic".
I lucked out on the processor, an Intel IVY BRIDGE 2.20 GHZ processor. I found an app that performance tested it. I do not know how to screen capture the results, but I wrote down the following....Core speed approx.: 2895.71 Mhz/ multiplier: 29.0 x /bus speed 99.85 mhz / 4 cores, 8 threads/ DDR3 8192 Mbytes/ Dual channel/ Dram freq. 798.9mhz /Cas Latency 11.0 / #1 PC3- 12800 (800 mhz)/ #2 PC3- 12800 (800mhz)....Intel graphics 4000/ 32 mb dedicated graphics memory/ gaming graphics 1664 mb. I have found some 2x8 (16gb) DDR3 cas Lat. 9 12800 204 pin 1600 RAM replacement memory that I want to install...but then I saw that it was a quad core...can I go beyond just the 2x8gb RAM? OR will the upgrade I have found have to do? (I've already found a hybrid 750gb drive to replace the clunky 5400 rpm 1TB hard drive!!) Is this last step... (the DDR3 Cas. Lat. 9 12800 2x 8gb RAM) (Anything Faster?)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820104317   (This is what I found- ANY better suggestions are welcome!!!)
...the ONLY performance boost I can do- short of some fancy bios boosts or over clocking? Sorry this was soooo long, but I wanted to be thorough! TY for all of your help in advance!
JD

Hi,
M4 is a series of many models, from your descriptions, I think this is the one:
   http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?cc=us&lc=en&dlc=en&docname=c03511047
It has two slots of RAM can can support 16GB max:
   http://www.crucial.com/upgrade/HP+-+Compaq-memory/ENVY+m4/ENVY+m4-1015dx-upgrades.html
Good luck for the upgrade.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

[865PE/G Neo2 Series] Neo 2 can't handle PAT

Hi, I have the following system in my signature. I have 512x2 Kingston DDR400 RAMs working on default frequency and timings. (Default:2.60, i use 2.75) When I enable PAT my pc face with some difcluties in booting. For example after bios logo PC stops responding with a blank screen. After a reset though it starts. Is there any solution for this problem?

Yes, agree with Thunder.
And there's some incompatible RAM with PAT.
Some CL 2.5 RAM can handle up to Turbo (I think, if not Fast), but before I get my Corsair XL, I have LL series (2-3-2-6) which can't handle FAST (even at FSB 200)!
It only can run pretty stable (not really stable) if I bump to 2.9v. Dunno why. But my XL can handle that easily, and yes, it's 2-2-2-5 .
Oh, don't forget to set FSB=201. Give it a try.

Can FDM handle more than one year at a time?

Hi,
I'm trying to load a multi-load file through FDM with the target being an Essbase cube and the source being a text file. The file is for 36 months which crosses 3 years. The problem is Oracle support is saying FDM can only handle one calendar year at a time and we need to load 3 separate files.
The file imports and validates ok. And the export only pushes data to the first year '2010' but it doesn't error out.
Any ideas?

If you use an excel file as the source, you can load all 36 periods.
You can also modify the adaptor to support this action but I would caution you that doing so will cause support to no longer support your application without requiring you to import a non customized adaptor. This also has consequences for when upgrading.
Let me add, FDM support is the best in the business. I have never had a situation where what they told me was incorrect. What you are trying to accomplish would be a custom solution that should be implemented by an experienced FDM resource that understands the impact of the customization.
Edited by: TonyScalese on May 6, 2010 3:10 PM

Memory modules can we use for RAM upgrade of HP Pavilion dv5-1198de??

What memory modules can we use for RAM upgrade of HP Pavilion dv5-1198de??
Max RAM? Vista? Windows 7?

I can't find a dv5-1198de but I did find a dv5-1198er which should be similiar. It states up to 8 gb of ram. HERE
I would try www.Crucial.com for suggested memory ,you can use their Scanner Tool to let it detect what you have and what you can upgrade/replace with.
******Clicking the Thumbs-Up button is a way to say -Thanks!.******
**Click Accept as Solution on a Reply that solves your issue to help others**

Thinkpad's and N100's w/ 945PM chipset can't address 3G Ram but Dell Can

Since I am a programmer, I am particularly interested in having the maximum amount of Ram available under 32 bit Windows.
Unfortunately, I have to buy a T61p to enable me to use 4GB.
From a reply to a NoteBook review Forum:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/archive/index.php/t-136639.html
At work, we have both Dell XPS and IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad laptops. We choose the T60 models for their compactness/weight and reliability, while we choose the XPS M1710 and M2010 for their 17 and 20-inch screens and somewhat faster graphics chips. The ThinkPad T60 computers have problems accessing over 3GB RAM, and that is NOT because of the chipset or the OS that we use, but, it is only because of the incompetent designers/engineers at IBM or Lenovo; let me explain:
We have tried to install both 32-bit and 64-bit version of Vista, Windows Server 2003 R2 STD, Win XP and different dists of LINUX on T60, T60p, Z61, Z61p, Z61m, (X60 and T43) and Lenovo 3000 series, but they simply can NOT access memory over 3GB (X60 and T43 can not support that since their chipset seem to have accessing issues over the magic 3GB, but we tried anyway)
We also tried the same thing on Dell XPS M1710 and M2010, and they could access almost the ENTIRE 4 GB installed even with 32-bit version of Windows Vista (BTW, 32-bit Vista can access 16 GB RAM with the right chipset so...). Of course, now you can guess that it was no problem with the 64-bit version of the OS:es we tried.
The Dell XPS M1710 and M2010 use exactly the same chipset found in T60 and Z60 series (Mobile Intel 945PM Express Chipset). In December 2006, we even opened a T60p (model 2007 8JG) and compared the chipset with the Dell XPS M1710, and well, I suppose that you have already guessed that it was the same chipset in both machines.
Honestly, I hoped that we would find the Mobile Intel 945 GM or GMS chipset in the T60 laptops (those chipsets seem to have this 3GB limit), since we had a BIG argue with the support guys at Lenovo, and they came with totally silly answers why the computers can not access over 3GB RAM. They even asked me what I need 4GB RAM for!! Can you imagine that?! You can ask ANY programmer/developer who works with virtual machines (both VPC and VMWare or even Parallels) and everyone will tell you that you can not have too much RAM!!! And it IS A BIG difference between 3GB and 4GB. However...
Now, we have heard rumors that HP NX94xx also can access 4GB RAM installed, but I can not confirm it myself, since I have not seen it myself.
And now, regarding to your post about mixing 2GB SO-DIMM with 1GB SO-DIMM, I would not recommend it. The 2GB SO-DIMM memory modules are pretty cheap now, and besides, you will lose a lot of speed mixing 2GB with 1GB memory modules. Just try different benchmarking programs and you will see. If you want to see quick results without a lot of installations, try Memtest86+
However, I think that it is very rotten that IBM/Lenovo does not care about their customers and lets a lot of incompetent technicians answer the phone. I have tried to come in contact with higher bosses and engineers, but they are simply unavailable. But it must be a way that we customers can make them hear us.. I only do not know how! :-/
And so, here ends my first (and long) post in here!
From the thinkpad forum, there is another confirmation, but the author is not aware that Dell did a better job with the P chipset:
T60/T61/p memory limitations -- the definitive answer [pics]
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?t=49703
update 10/25/2007: now includes T60/p information.
T60 and T60p:
the T60 and T60p are based off of the intel socket M processors. no matter how much memory you install in these thinkpads, only 3GB will be addressable regardless of operating system used. this is a physical limitation and there is absolutely no workaround. if you have a T60/p then installing 4GB total system memory is a waste. save your money, stop at 3GB, and put the savings either in the bank or toward a T61/p if you want 4GB.
quoted from official lenovo documentation:
Quote: Maximum memory capacity may require the replacement of standard component with largest supported component available. On ThinkPad systems with an Intel 945GM, 945PM, GM965, or PM965 chipset, even though it is possible to physically install 4GB of memory, the actual amount of memory addressable by an operating system will be limited to 3GB. This limitation does not exist with the Intel GM965 and PM965 with the 64-bit operating systems Windows XP Professional 64-bit and Windows Vista 64-bit Editions.
the key point to take away from this quote: the T60 and T60p are based off of the 945GM and 945PM chipsets and therefore fall under the 3GB physical limitation as stated above. even with 4GB total system memory and a capable OS, you still can't see or use more 3GB no matter what you do.
T61 and T61p:
the T61 and T61p are based off of the intel socket P processors. these systems are capable of using up to 4GB total system memory as long as you use the proper OS. below are the results from the four most popular microsoft OSes tested on my T61p.

i wrote the article over at TPF regarding T60/1/p memory limitations.
while i've read that certain dell models can supposedly access all 4GB, i have yet to see definitive proof backing this up.   from my understanding, dell wrote their BIOSes to report the maximum installed memory but the systems still cannot utilize more than 3GB regardless of what is reported.   dell is the only manufacturer with a 945-based system which claims to use all 4GB so it leads me to think that something fishy is going on.   if the 945 could use more than 3GB then you'd think lenovo, apple, HP, etc. would have been able to pull it off as well.
before buying my T61p i performed weeks of research on the subject of 3GB/4GB limitations in chipsets.   i have yet to find definitive evidence showing that a merom-based system can truly access more than 3GB because of the chipset's lack of memory hoisting capability.   santa rosa seems to be the first mobile chipset supporting memory hoisting (which is necessary for moving memory addresses above the 4GB mark so that all 4GB of physical memory can be addressed by the OS).
the simple solution is to buy a T61p.   while the T60p did have optional IPS displays, the T61/p is better in absolutely every aspect except display quality.   i've had my hands on numerous T60/p systems of friends/family/colleagues and wouldn't trade my T61p for any of them.   my next upgrade won't happen until intel makes a mobile chipset able to address 8GB+ system memory (which santa rosa very well may be able to do but we won't know for sure until 4GB SODIMMs are released for public consumption).
ThinkStation C20
ThinkPad X1C · X220 · X60T · s30 · 600

N100's and Thinkpads w/ 945PM chipset can't address 3G Ram but Dell Can

From a reply to a NoteBook review Forum:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/archive/index.php/t-136639.html
At work, we have both Dell XPS and IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad laptops. We choose the T60 models for their compactness/weight and reliability, while we choose the XPS M1710 and M2010 for their 17 and 20-inch screens and somewhat faster graphics chips. The ThinkPad T60 computers have problems accessing over 3GB RAM, and that is NOT because of the chipset or the OS that we use, but, it is only because of the incompetent designers/engineers at IBM or Lenovo; let me explain:
We have tried to install both 32-bit and 64-bit version of Vista, Windows Server 2003 R2 STD, Win XP and different dists of LINUX on T60, T60p, Z61, Z61p, Z61m, (X60 and T43) and Lenovo 3000 series, but they simply can NOT access memory over 3GB (X60 and T43 can not support that since their chipset seem to have accessing issues over the magic 3GB, but we tried anyway)
We also tried the same thing on Dell XPS M1710 and M2010, and they could access almost the ENTIRE 4 GB installed even with 32-bit version of Windows Vista (BTW, 32-bit Vista can access 16 GB RAM with the right chipset so...). Of course, now you can guess that it was no problem with the 64-bit version of the OS:es we tried.
The Dell XPS M1710 and M2010 use exactly the same chipset found in T60 and Z60 series (Mobile Intel 945PM Express Chipset). In December 2006, we even opened a T60p (model 2007 8JG) and compared the chipset with the Dell XPS M1710, and well, I suppose that you have already guessed that it was the same chipset in both machines.
Honestly, I hoped that we would find the Mobile Intel 945 GM or GMS chipset in the T60 laptops (those chipsets seem to have this 3GB limit), since we had a BIG argue with the support guys at Lenovo, and they came with totally silly answers why the computers can not access over 3GB RAM. They even asked me what I need 4GB RAM for!! Can you imagine that?! You can ask ANY programmer/developer who works with virtual machines (both VPC and VMWare or even Parallels) and everyone will tell you that you can not have too much RAM!!! And it IS A BIG difference between 3GB and 4GB. However...
Now, we have heard rumors that HP NX94xx also can access 4GB RAM installed, but I can not confirm it myself, since I have not seen it myself.
And now, regarding to your post about mixing 2GB SO-DIMM with 1GB SO-DIMM, I would not recommend it. The 2GB SO-DIMM memory modules are pretty cheap now, and besides, you will lose a lot of speed mixing 2GB with 1GB memory modules. Just try different benchmarking programs and you will see. If you want to see quick results without a lot of installations, try Memtest86+
However, I think that it is very rotten that IBM/Lenovo does not care about their customers and lets a lot of incompetent technicians answer the phone. I have tried to come in contact with higher bosses and engineers, but they are simply unavailable. But it must be a way that we customers can make them hear us.. I only do not know how! :-/
And so, here ends my first (and long) post in here!
Message Edited by charlestek on 01-05-2008 07:59 PM

Hi
Supporting greater than 4GByte isn't easy. It could be a piece of hardware in the Lenovo/IBM laptops that are preventing greater than 3GByte which might be resolved by a driver update.
Some info here: http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEdrv.mspx
I agree Lenovo support hasn't been very good as they could have provided some information themselves or offered to look into it.
Regards
Phil
Note from Moderator: Converted to clickable link.
Message Edited by nonny on 01-06-2008 11:06 AM

How the material PRT issue/receipt to the production order can be handled?

Hi PP Gurus,
        For one of our clients, the handling of PRT is to be controlled with the issue/receipt for the production order.
1. What is the procedure for issue/receipt of PRT material in the SAP?
2. What is the procedure to block the PRT for the creation/release of production order when it was already assigned to the other production order during the same time?
3. The PRT is to be available automatically once the assigned production order operation is confiremd.How it can be handled in the SAP?
Appreciate your early response.
Thanks,
Reddy.

Hi Ramanujam,
        Thanks for your response.
     1. The dies can be used for the production of Pressing, Casting and Forging etc. These dies will be managed in the stores. The stores representatives will issue the die to the shop floor for an operation of a production order.They will return back the die once the production is completed at that operation using the die. How to map this process in the SAP.
        Typically, these dies can be treated as PRT materials in the SAP system.
     2. OPJK configuration is not sufficient. The same PRT will be assigned to the many production orders during the same time.The system won't block with only this setting. There are some other steps involved to complete the process.
                 I would like to know the complete procedure with all the steps to block the PRT once it was assigned to the production order operation. The same PRT is to be available for other production orders automatically once the operation is confirmed after production.

How can we handle browser settings while dealing with the security ?

Hi ,
how can we handle browser settings while dealing with the security ?When we configured security in web.xml , during the first request the container is asking for the authentication credentials once they are provided it go's on. but when the user gives a fresh request from the second window within the same browser that time it is not asking for authentication. How can we overcome this.Is there anything to do with server configurations?
How can we make the container no to keep the things or act like session?

Ya... I am taking a small example need not happen always but a kind of possibility i am thinking off.
once the user sign out and just left without closing the browser and a friend (suppose not a good friend ... just kidding...) of that user may open the same jsp or file .This time the security is breached. If that feature or property exists....
I know what you might say ... the user will log-out before leaving where a programer might invalidate the session at the time of log out.
Consider the case of a bad Programing or just a programer might forget to invalidate,At that time as a application administrator how can he solve that issue.
Thanks.......
Edited by: user8483670 on Jun 6, 2011 1:08 AM
Edited by: user8483670 on Jun 6, 2011 1:09 AM

How can I manage more RAM on my iPod Touch 4G ?

How can I manage more RAM on my iPod Touch 4G ?
My iPod Touch 4G used to have 120MB of free RAM, but it suppost to have 256MB of RAM...120MB is totally not enough for the applications and the iOS to run smoothly...my applications always close in a sudden and the iOS is extremely lag...
I'm thinking is there anyway to manage of free more RAM on my iPod Touch 4G, I wanna free at least to 150MB...
I've tried iMemoryEnhancer, Mem Tool, Daemon Tools and Memory Free; but none of them work...I've also tried simply click on Free Memory on SBSettings...but all applications came out with the exact same result...120MB...
My iPod Touch 4G is running on iOS 4.3.1(8G4) and got 277 applications installed with around 10 Cydia tweaks..so please can anybody help me out ?
TYVM

try these
1. quit apps on MT bar
2. restart your ipod
also, how many G(or M) have you used in the ipod, and how many G do you have in orginal?
Calvin

Can we handle exceptions for the expressions in select query?

Hi all,
Can we handle exceptions for the expressions in select query.
I created a view, there I am extracting a substring from a character data and expected that as a number.
For example consider the following query.
SQL> select to_number( substr('r01',2,2) ) from dual;
TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR('R01',2,2))
1
Here we got the value as "1".
Consider the following query.
SQL> select to_number( substr('rr1',2,2) ) from dual;
select to_number( substr('rr1',2,2) ) from dual
ORA-01722: invalid number
For this I got error. Because the substr returns "r1" which is expected to be as number. So it returns "Invalid number".
So, without using procedures or functions can we handle these type of exceptions?
I am using Oracle 10 G.
Thanks in advance.
Thank you,
Regards,
Gowtham Sen.

SQL> select decode(ltrim(rtrim(translate(substr('r21', 2, 2), '0123456789', ' ' ), ' '), ' '), null, (substr('r21', 2, 2)), null) from dual;
DE
21
SQL> ed a
SQL> select decode(ltrim(rtrim(translate(substr('rr1', 2, 2), '0123456789', ' ' ), ' '), ' '), null, (substr('rr1', 2, 2)), null) from dual;
D
-

In-Context Editor can't handle implicit index.html

The In-Context Editor can't handle implicit index.html - e.g., when a menu link points to /subfolder/ with a file named index.html inside, the link works fine on the front-end but In-Context Editor users get a 404 Page Not Found error.
Naively, it appends .htm to the folder, producing an invalid url like this: /subfolder/.htm
The workaround is to explicitly include the filename in the link like /subfolder/index.html, but this is undesirable.
Anyone else been bitten by this?

/subfolder
Will go to the same place as well.

Can't handle 16 GB RAM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for