Can't obtain an access token for Translator - Authentication failed.

Hi,
I copied the PHP code at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh454950.aspx, pasted it into a file, and made a simple AJAX call to it. I have checked to make sure that the client id and client secret are correct. Somehow it returned an error message
saying: Exception-ACS50012: Authentication failed.
I read somewhere here that we can only use numeric digits for the client id so I changed the client id to a number. However that still didn't work.
Please help.

Hi,
I'm glad to hear that you have solved your issue, if you have any issues later, welcome to our forum again.
Best Regards
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Similar Messages

How can i obtain a user guide for the ipod nano 16GB 5th gen. with out printing it off the computor

How can i obtain a user guide for the ipod nano 16GB 5th gen. without printing it off the computor.

You can't, at least not the one provided by Apple.
B-rock

I lost my serial number for photoshop elements11 and premiere elements 11 combo. how can I obtain a serial number for this program?

I lost my serial number for photoshop elements11 and premiere elements 11 combo. how can I obtain a serial number for this program?

If you registered the software you should be able to find the serial number thru your Adobe account online.
To locate the serial number:
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/find-serial-number.html

Where can I find an Access key for the user with "AS ABAP sneak preview" ?

Hi all,
I have installed AS ABAP sneak preview on my laptop.
I use username "bcuser" and password "minisap". when I try to create some objects like, i.e. Function Group for Function Module, then it ask for an access key.
Where can I find an access key for this ABAP SNEAK PREVIEW for user "bcuser"?
I have gone thru some documents, I know we need to register user in OSS and need to get an access key from the marketplace but can I register this user "bcuser" or it's already register? I need some more specific information to resolve this issue.
Please advise me on above question.
Thanks,
Haresh Solanki

Hi Rich,
I have entered ZH_XYZ as a Function Group name to create a new function group. While I am creating it, it asks for the Access Key. I tries to enter an Access Key here for the first time and it says wrong entry for access key.
Also if I try to create new Function Module, it ask me to select the Function Group. As I couldn't create a new Function Group, I tried to select from existing(from SAP System's FG), still it asks for an access key, I enter the an Access Key here, then also it says wrong entry.
I really got confused with this Access Key thing, can you provide me some insights?
Thanks,
Haresh Solanki

Where can I obtain Canon Printer drivers for Maverick 10.9.2...since I have moved to Mavericks none of my printers work. I have the following Canon Printers, Selphy CP720, Canon Pixma IP6600 and Canon Pro9500 Mark II

Where can I obtain Canon Printer drivers for Maverick 10.9.2...since I have moved to Mavericks none of my printers work. I have the following Canon Printers, Selphy CP720, Canon Pixma IP6600 and Canon Pro9500 Mark II?

Printer and Scanner software available for download:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3669?viewlocale=en_US
Canon drivers for Mavericks:
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/support/consumer/printers_multifunction/pixma_mp_s eries/pixma_mp160#DriversAndSoftware

Obtain a primary token for a user who does not have permission to logon locally

I would like to know whether it's possible to obtain a primary token for a user who doesn't have permission to log on locally. If yes, what the recommended way is for doing that.
I called LogonUserW with logon32_logon_network logontype for user which is not allowed to logon locally. It returned impersonation token. I called DuplicateTokenEx to create primary token but it still returned impersonation token.

A Network Logon is always going to return an impersonation token. This is by design.
A Batch or Service logon would return a Primary Token. The user would need the corresponding right to return these 2 types of token. Typically, all users are allowed to generate a Network Token (Impersonation Token) but as you have discovered
it has limited usage which is by design.
thanks
Frank K [MSFT]
Follow us on Twitter, www.twitter.com/WindowsSDK

Can I obtain a 3rd license for my Versin 8 Adobe Photo Elements

Can I obtain a 3rd license for my Adobe Photo Elements Version 8?

Doubt it, but you'd be better contacting Adobe Sales (this is a user-to-user forum). Alternatively go to eBay - there's plenty of copies available there.
Cheers,
Neale
Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your children
If this post or another user's post resolves the original issue, please mark the posts as correct and/or helpful accordingly. This helps other users with similar trouble get answers to their questions quicker. Thanks.

How can I obtain Panther or Tiger for my '01 Power Mac?

My computer will not support Leopard and am stuck with OS X 10.1. Where can I obtain an upgrade to 10.3 or 10.4? Apple Store does not cary these systems or upgrades to these systems.

DRodrigues, welcome to Apple Discussions.
Tiger install DVDs are in short supply. Tiger is no longer available at the Apple Store but is still available for $129 by calling Apple Phone Sales @ 1-800-MY-APPLE (1-800-692-7753). For other sources, do a Google search for MA453Z/A and M9639Z/A . Also look on eBay. Be sure & buy a retail version (black with silver X) and not a model specific version (gray).
Also check this web store http://www.lacomputercompany.com/cgi-bin/rpcart/index.cgi?command=dispitem&type= sku&sku=19521
 Cheers, Tom

OIM 9031: Can I create an access policy for Organization

In OIM I can provision resource objects both to Users and Organizations.
To automate resource provisioning I can add users to groups and assign an access policies to these grouos.
But I can link access policies only to user groups which makes it useless when I want to automate resource provisioning to organizations.
How can I use access policies for OIM organizations?

access policies are used to provision a standard set of resources to users belonging to a particular group when on boarded or moved to that group. Access policies are always defined on groups in the idm space and never on orgs. There is no concept of membership with organizations.

How can a structured frame be used for translating books to foreign languages?

I keep reading about how a structured approach can improve the translation process (from english to foreign languages), however, i can't seem to find specifics about a particular method or tutorials about how to go about it (specifically). My question is, how (specifically) can structured framemaker be used for translation from english to foreign languages? Links to tutorials on this issue would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

@Ian Proudfood
A well organized XML based project will definitely save translation costs. There are many advantages to the XML approach to translation management including:
Almost zero DTP rework costs - make the EDD/Template do all of the work!
Translation is application version independent - no need to wait for the Translation Memory/CMS system vendor to support the latest version of FrameMaker.
»... a well organized XML based project will definitively save translation costs.« – I have read sentences like this from a lot of consultants. And I have consulted/supported a lot of customers after those consultants left the stage. I always hear more or less the same from all of those clients. No question, I hear a lot of arguments for working with XML in tech doc, most of the arguments you mention included. Most of the tech writers are happy with the new structured FrameMaker and enjoy writing. And, cross your heart: Finally there's no alternative to XML in the long term if you take your tech writer job seriously. No question – working with pure XML in a professional information architecture in a structured, guiding editing environment like FrameMaker is cool, fun, faster and produces more open, more accessible, more reusable, more reliable, more consistent, in a nutshell: more valuable data.
But what I have never ever heard, and I'm talking about several hundred companies, is: We save more money on translation now. You might imagine that this is surprising me since many years. This is why I always ask: Did you save any costs in your translation projects? Surprisingly the answer is always: No. Actually some – no, wait: many – tell me, that their translation agency even charges more now, because they have a lot of new costs:
Costs, to customize their translation memory system to the clients custom xml,
costs to follow badly or not documented changes in the client's xml structure (DTD/Schema changes) in the TMS,
costs because of more engineering work like
valididating xml in advance,
fixing invalid xml exports,
fixing invalid translations due to – sometimes massively – increased amount of tag errors because of tagging differences of "old" (legacy mif) and "new" (xml) tags,
dealing with just too big XML files that need to be carefully split, so that the TMS has a chance to read it, or alternatively:
"glue" the ten-thousand xml "snippets" to more handy chunks,
project managers and translators that need to do additional checks, validations, verifyings - and often not knowing what to do with those cryptic error messages, meaning additional support costs
Of course, many if no all of these and many other problems I did not mention here can be solved. And many are not exactly system immanent problems but communication problems (like introducing or renaming elements/attributes but not documenting this and not communicating this to the translation service provider) or would apply to any system change (e.g. also when switching from Word to Frame). However, I do not know of any single translation company on this planet (and I know virtually thousands of them from countries all over the world) that reduced the price per word for just a single pence, just because the client switched over from Word/Quark/FrameMaker/InDesign/Whatever to XML.
Just ask your translation service provider: Will you charge me less per word if I send you XML instead of MIF? I would really be surprised to hear a "yes". And frankly, if you have ever compared a professional FrameMaker document with the same document in xml format in a professional system like Trados: There is actually no difference that would justify any price difference. The text is the same, the amount of words identical, the number of tags is identical, it even looks identical in the translation system (I can post screenshots if you like). From the translation perspective there is no single reason why a translator should charge a single pence less.
So, it's a modern myth, that switching to xml reduces translation costs. That might be true, if you come from a really medieval documentation szenario with MS Word or the like, with manual formatting without any styles and so on (I see tech docs every day where even the TOC is typed in manually!!!) and swith from there to a modern structured xml authoring in combination with other supporting tools like authoring memory / authoring assistance, controlled language, translation memory and terminology managent and control, snippet based content management and so on. That will increase the consistency and quality of your data, which will reduce translation costs in the long term. But the truth is: This has nothing to do with XML per se, but with professional writing and professional management.
So, what's left in the money saving story? No more DTP in the target languages? I always hear, that with XML and FrameMaker you do not have to "format" the translated document. The truth is: If you have a professionally formatted (unstructured) document, you don't have to take care of it, too. Modern tools like Trados keep 100% of the formatting 100% correct in the translated document. If the underlying template is intelligent enough to take account of text amount changes due to longer translations, and if you don't have too many local formatting overrides, the DTP is actually zero and can be reduced to a few mintes/hours for "flying" of the document to check out for unexpeted problems wich can occure in both structured and unstructured documents.
Just to give some numbers on this: We are processing every day technical documentations for a quite big company. A typical documentation from them is about 250 pages in unstructured FrameMaker 9 (source language is English). Until now they were resistent to all my XML pushing. The Documentation is based on a straight, simple template (with our help "reduced to the max") and there are no formatting overrides (a script automatically checks this). The post translation Quality Assurance effort is - depending on the target language - usually something between 1 to 4 hours – that's a few seconds per page for the languages where already a lot of past Quality Assurance Steps went back into the Translation Memories and up to a minute per page for more "problematic" languages).
So, again: XML will not save you a single pence on translations. But it might help you to produce more open, more accessible, more reusable, more reliable, more consistent, in a nutshell: more valuable data. But if you already have properly set up (ustructured) FrameMaker Documents and already work with a professional translation memory system, you will be quite disappointed to learn, that the impressive money saving promises you recently saw on that great PowerPoint slides melt down to a few bucks over a couple of years.
Kind regards,
Stefan Gentz

HT1349 How can I obtain an original receipt for a Time Capsule (external hard drive back up) that was stolen? I want to get the serial number of the device.

How can I obtain a receipt for the purchase of my Time Capsule back up external drive. My drive was stolen and I am trying to find the serial number of the device.

Unless you registered it, for warranty purposes, with the manufacturer, there's no way.
Or if you have the box it came in, the box may have the S/N.
 Cheers, Tom

Provision to secure access token (For OAuth2.0 User Authentication)

Hi,
May i check if there are any provision in place to secure an access token ?
For example, facebook use app secret prof (sha256 hash) to encrypt their access token, but i am able to see any security best practice in the documentation. Please direct me if i might have missed that portion out.
Reference :
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh243647.aspx

I think that as you are using Azure AD for the OAuth authentication, the fact that the tenant is configured to use ADFS (single sign-on) shouldn't change the OAuth flow from client/caller perspective. What permissions have you configured for SharePoint
in Azure AD? I guess the error comes from Azure AD, before or after ADFS authentication?
This seems like a similar issue (with no resolution either).

Where can I obtain copyright free maps for my iBook?

Hi, I want to publish interactive maps in a iBook. Is it possible to obtain copyright-free maps (for Australia) to publish using iBooks Author?

hello, take a look at http://www.openstreetmap.org

How can I have different access control for the guest network (different than the main network)?

I am trying to control my main wireless network with access control via mac id with no password. I wanted a separate guest network with password access and no access control. However, the only way that the guest network works is if I specify unlimited access as the default. Is what I am trying to do possible.

I am trying to control my main wireless network with access control via mac id with no password.
Definitely not a recommended method for security. MAC addresses are easily cloned by anyone who wants to do so with free tools available on the Internet. An unwanted guest will be on your network in less than a minute if they want to be.
Strongly recommend that you use WPA2 Personal security with a non-dictionary password to protect your network.
I wanted a separate guest network with password access and no access control. However, the only way that the guest network works is if I specify unlimited access as the default. Is what I am trying to do possible.
Unfortunately, Apple does not allow separate Access Control for the "main" and "guest" networks. It's all or nothing, I am afraid.
Likely, the "best" way to set up Access Control is change the default rule to No Access, Then you will need to enter in the details for every device that you want to allow to connect for both the "main" and "guest" networks with the time limits for each device.

Shell access required for RADIUS authentication?

Hello all,
A customer of mine has a fleet of modern Mac laptops, all accessing 3 AFP file servers. Access to those file servers is governed by a Snow Leopard Open Directory Master. Pretty simple.
I’ve been tasked with introducing RADIUS authentication to the WLAN there. The WAPs are all Airport Extremes, so again the setup is pretty simple.
But in testing, I see that users can authenticate to the RADIUS WLAN only if I give those user accounts shell access in Open Directory. If a user’s account has a login shell set to None (our previous default), then any RADIUS authentication attempt produces the following log error:
Auth: [unix] [USERNAME]: invalid shell [/dev/null]
If I switch that user’s login shell to (for example) /bin/bash, then restart RADIUS, that user authenticates successfully thereafter.
Is this expected behavior? Is there an alternative to giving everyone shell access?
Thanks for any info,
Brandon White
System Administrator
www.technico.us

Hi Peter,
have a look at the RADIUS implementation CookBook (www.vasco.com/novell)
chris
> We use Vasco tokens for two things: Checkpoint Firewall-1 VPN
> authentication, and iChain 2.2 RADIUS authentication. The current
> RADIUS.NLM that we use is from the iChain authentication CD.
>
> The only problem I can think of to mention is the "Unknown RADIUS client"
> error that we got after NW6 SP5. That was solved by the latest NMAS
patches
> and an upgrade from eDir 8.6.2 to 8.7.3.
>
>
> "Peter van de Meerendonk" <[email protected]>
wrote in
> message news:JNiQd.595$[email protected]..
> > > Well, just let me cover my hiney a little. We did have extremely bad
> > > results with Activcard ACO000 tokens, but that is an old product from
> > about
> > > 3-4 years ago. I have no knowledge of the current Activcard tokens.
> > >
> > OK, but the licensing policy makes activcard a costly alternative.
we've
> got
> > a good deal on RSA, and are negociating a deal on Vasco. eventually we
> might
> > need 250+ tokens.
> >
> > I am very interested in configuration details of your setup. do you use
> the
> > tokens only for checkpoint authentication, or for novell
authentication as
> > well?
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Can't obtain an access token for Translator - Authentication failed.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for