Can the Quadro 2000 do HD editing?

According to the NVidia website the best it can do is SD
Do i really need to spend a fortune for the Quadro 4000?
Unfortunately my pockets are not as deep as I would like but this is my set up
Intel Sandy Bridge Core I7 3.4GHz 2600K LGA 1155 processor
Gigabyte P67A-UD3R B3 LGA 1155 Intel P67(Revised B3 stepping) DDR3 2133+ Ultra Durable 3
3X USB power support ATI CrossFireX DualBIOS SATA Raid Ready
Kingston DDR3 1600MHz Gaming performance Hyper X Memory 8GB X 2= 16GB
Western Digital 1TB x3 set to RAID 0
64M SATA2 HDD
COOLER MASTER GX 750W PSU SLI Ready Single+ 12V V2.31 Ultra silent Intelligent Fan
STlab F171 1394b 3-port Firewire
Blu Ray writer
So the above is gonna cost me a bit but I will be doing freelance videography, Im hoping I can cut some cost somewhere, can I use a Quadro 2000
or a GTX 580 or do I need a Quadro 4000 for HD editing as stated on the NVidia website?
Thankyou

To be honest, the Quadro 4000 is actually below the GeForce GTX 460 or GTX 560 (hardware-spec-wise): The Quadro 4000 is based on the original GF100 GPU that is relatively inefficient in terms of performance per watt compared to newer Fermi GPUs. In this case, the GF100 Fermi was supposed to have 512 CUDA cores (but only a maximum of 480 CUDA cores are ultimately enabled, as they were in the GeForce GTX 480) - but the Quadro 4000 has half of the GF100's CUDA cores disabled, resulting in only 256 CUDA cores being enabled. (For comparison, the most cutdown version of the GF100 GPU used in GeForce cards, the GeForce GTX 465, still has 352 CUDA cores enabled.) The GeForce GTX 460 series and the GTX 560, on the other hand, are based on newer and slightly more efficient versions of the Fermi architecture. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is the slowest of the 460/560 series GPUs, but still has 288 CUDA cores enabled. The full-blown GTX 460 and the GTX 560 (a cut-down version of the 384-core GTX 560 Ti) both have 336 CUDA cores.
Thus, the Quadro 4000 is still underspecced (GPU-wise) compared to even a GTX 460 SE, let alone a GTX 560 Ti that we've been recommending as a BFTB (Bang-For-The-Buck) choice. And even the top-of-the-line Quadro 6000 is only slightly faster than a GTX 470 but is still slower than a GTX 480, 570 or 580.

Similar Messages

Can the new $2500 Macbook Pro Edit 4K Video?

I'm very close to purchasing a new 15" Top of the line Macbook Pro to replace my six+ year old iMac 24" Extreme Edition. I want to buy as future-proof a Mac as I possibly can, while getting the entire package in a laptop as I need a laptop this time around for a side project.
As beastly as the new Macbook Pro is (16GB RAM, Discrete GeForce Graphics) - would anyone know if it has the power to edit 4K Video?

You can do all things, you can do at an other Mac with the MacBook Air. But for the most programs isn't enough power in the MacBook Air. So your programs like Photoshop wouldn't be as fast as with an MacBook Pro or an other Mac...

How can the user authorization "Display , not Edit" be fixed?

Hi,
I need to give users the authorization to "DISPLAY" a transaction (e.g. VKM1). They are not allowed to "EDIT" or "RELEASE DOCUMENTS".
How can I do that?
Thank you for your feedback.
Kind regards,
Linda

for every transaction code there will be objects which is linked to the transactions code.
For ex:- For VKM1 Transaction code there are two objects (V_KNKK_FRE, V_VBUK_FRE) with activity 03(display) and 23(maintain). So, give the authorisation activity 03 to the transaction. So, users can able to see the data but not having the authorisation to release or maintain.
Reward points if helpful

Can the Action in Slides be Edited?

The timing on the action in slides is sometimes off. Is there a way to edit the action in slides?

Those activities (an action is something totally different, will be triggered by an event) normally will be on separate slides: the typing of the text, the click on a list etc. Sorry, will leave this to someone else because I don't understand your question at all.

Quadro 2000 v. gtx 570 v. Quadro 4000

Can anyone comment on the MPE performance difference between the Quadro 2000, the gtx 570 and the Quadro 4000? I'll be using hacked GH2 footage with CBR intra-frame coding, which (I'm told!) can and should be put on AVC Intra time-lines (not AVCHD).
I'm concerned most with time-line responsiveness and playback performance. DVD encoding, exporting footage, etc., won't be happening very often, so that's of less concern.
I'm aware that the gtx 570 is probably the best buy of the three; but that's not the question. Many thanks.

In any case, performance wise the Quadro 2000 is a waste of money: It costs almost $400, yet it performs equally as slowly as a $100 card. And in Premiere Pro CS5.5, the encoding performance becomes significantly slower with lesser GPUs. Look up posts by Bill Gehrke and you may find a list of GPUs along with their performance charts in the PPBM5 benchmarks. Bill tested a wide range of GPUs from a GTX 580 all the way down to an old 9500 GT. Pay particular attention to the MPEG-2 DVD scores. You will find that even on an overclocked i7-2600K system, the system with a GTX 550 Ti took more than twice as long (146 seconds) as the GTX 580 (60 seconds) or even a GTX 560 Ti 448-core (68 seconds) in that test. The Quadro 2000 would have performed even slower than the GTX 550 Ti in that same test (heck, the GTX 550 Ti itself is slightly slower than a first-generation GTX 260 in this test despite having an equal number of CUDA cores due to the 550 Ti's slightly lower total memory bandwidth). The Quadro 4000 would have performed roughly on a par with Bill's tested GTX 285 (117 seconds) in that same test.
On the other hand, if you're encoding to H.264, then the Quadro 2000 would have been only slightly slower than the GTX 570; you would have had to downgrade further to Quadro 600 (GeForce GT 430) level to see a significant degradation of H.264 encoding performance.
Secondly, the Quadro 2000 has only 1GB of RAM total. With your footage, it is possible that any effects that you apply will eat up more than the amount of memory on the card. If a scene needs 1.5GB of VRAM to render using MPE GPU mode, then the 1GB card will run out of RAM. And when the rendering job runs out of VRAM, that entire frame or scene will default entirely to the MPE software-only mode, which will result in slower performance and may also degrade image quality.
And I strongly recommend avoiding the purchase of off-the-shelf PCs or workstations to begin with: Those systems are way too expensive for such bottom-of-the-barrel performance, and upgrading such a system via the manufacturer would have cost you three to four times more than if you bought those same parts elsewhere. If you can't build an editing workstation yourself (or find it too much of a bother), consider contacting a vendor who specializes in custom-configured editing systems such as ADK.

Workstation with Quadro 2000 or GTX 570 HD 2,5GB, for PP CS 5.5?

Hey there,
I'm going to build up a new workstation for video-editing using the Production Premium Suite CS 5.5.
But there is still one big question and I can't find a proper answer.
What GPU should I take or which one will be faster? A Quadro 2000 or a GTX 570HD with 2,5GB?
I know the Quadro has 192 cores and the GTX has 480 cores. So the GTX should be faster
Actually? But would it really be faster? I can't find any Benchmark comparisons or stuff.
Some say a Quadro 2000 is better, if it's only a workstation. But I also read that people
Prefer the GTX-Models.
I know the GTX needs more energy and it's getting warmer when used, but those two facts
Wouldn't persuade me to buy the Quadro.
The rest of my system would look like this:
Intel Core i7-2600
ASRock Z68 Extreme 3 Gen. 3
G.Skill RipJaws-X DIMM Kit 16 GB
Crucial m4 128GB for OS, Programms
Western Digital AV-GP for the media-archive and the orginal videofiles
WD Caviar Green for Export and stuff like that
Fractal Design Arc
Scythne Katana 3
Super Flower Golden Green Pro 650 W
So the only missing thing is the GPU.
Thanks in advance for your help!

For the most part, I second Harm. You see, the AV-GP is not compatible with PCs at all - but rather, it's a version of the WD Caviar Green designed specifically for set-top DVRs/PVRs. And in either case, the current WD Greens spin at far slower than 7200 RPM - in fact, most current WD Green drives spin at only 5405 RPM (with a few spinning as slow as 4200 RPM). The slower rotational speed negatively affects both sequential transfer performance and random seek performance.
As for the non-K 2600, it is limited unlocked, not completely locked. There are two disadvantages to this limited unlock: Only the maximum single-core Turbo Boost multiplier is manually selectable, with the differing multi-core Turbo multipliers also increasing by the exact same number of steps as the single-core Turbo frequency (unlike on the K chips, the multi-core Turbo multipliers on the non-K chips cannot be set independently of the single-core Turbo multiplier). Second, the maximum Turbo multiplier setting is limited to four steps above the normal single-core Turbo multiplier: In the case of the 2600, the maximum single-core Turbo multiplier can be set at up to 42x (this will force the maximum quad-core multiplier to be boosted to 39x, which will result in a maximum quad-core overclock to 3.9GHz with the BCLK remaining at its stock 100MHz). The 2600K is so much easier to overclock the way the user wants it while costing only a few dollars more than the non-K 2600.
As for the original decision between the Quadro 2000 and the GTX 570, definitely the latter: The Quadro 2000, as far as CS5.5 is concerned, is little more than a slightly underclocked GeForce GTS 450 with a huge heatsink attached to it and still only 1GB of VRAM. And as Bill's testing with the various GeForce GPUs (to be specific, Bill tested the GTX 580, GTX 480, GTX 560 Ti 448, GTX 285, GTX 260, GTX 550 Ti and the 9500 GT, from fastest to slowest - however, the GTX 560 Ti 448 is roughly equal to the GTX 480 in performance) in CS5.5 has demonstrated, the Quadro 2000 would definitely be slower than a GTX 550 Ti, especially in MPEG-2 DVD encodes.

Strange: NVidia Quadro 2000 freezes after the 6th video mode switching

Asus P8P67 with NVidia Quadro 2000 and some 24" Asus monitor (SVGA/DVI/HDMI; DVI being used) and the most strange behavior:
1. if starting with display manager: after 6th sequence: Ctrl-Alt-F1, Ctr-Alt-F7 or 6th logout from my DE,
2. if starting with no display manager: after 6th `startx' and logout
my monitor and keyboard freeze (the monitor gets dark gray or black, sometimes with `no DVI signal' message). If I connect remotely and kill all GUI applications it unfreezes but I'm unable to start GUI once again. The most strange thing is that there are absolutely no error messages in logs.
Tried 295.53 and 295.49 drivers,
tried `vga=normal' boot option
tried `acpi_osi=Linux' boot option
tried changing USB ports and the keyboard
tried removing any `*hdmi*' modules
tried...
I have no idea how to deal with this problem. Seems like some video resource exhaustion but ...
*any* help welcome!

Solved by https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Nv … s.22_issue
A new file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-nvidia.conf :
Section "Device"
Identifier "Device0"
Option "ModeValidation" "NoTotalSizeCheck"
EndSection
fixed it.
Last edited by quayasil (2012-09-03 14:07:36)

How can I get all options under edit in iPhoto to appear and revert in red, the only option it gives me is to select multiple

how can I get all options under edit in iPhoto on my phone to appear it has revert in red on theleft side & done on the right side, the only choice it gives me is select multiple

The usual cause of that issue is a corrupted or missing font that Firefox replaces by another, in this case a bold, font.
As a test you can try to disable the default font and choose a few different fonts (Arial, Verdana, Tahoma, Times New Roman) to see if you can identify the culprit.<br />
you will have to reinstall that corrupted font.

How can I trash a large number of Emails quickly from my iPod touch rather than using the one-at-a-time Edit method?

How can I trash a large number of Emails quickly from my iPod touch rather than using the one-at-a-time Edit method?

Once you tap on edit, you can select multiple emails, the tap archive.

HT201401 I can't add a contact or edit contacts the little + sign is no longer on my phone...same thing on my iCalendar. I can no longer add events or dates. how do I fix this?

I can't add a contact or edit contacts the little + sign is no longer on my phone...same thing on my iCalendar. I can no longer add events or dates. how do I fix this?

Reset your phone, hold the home and off button down until the apple symbol comes up. If that doesnt fix it then you need to restore your phone in itunes, Connect to itunes, right click on your phones name to the left, then click restore from backup. That providing you have backed up your phone recently.

I have installed ACDSee Pro3 and have problem to transfer photofiles from device: I got the message; The item could not be edited because you do not have sufficent access privileges or destination volume is no longer available." What can I do?

I have installed ACDSee Pro3 and have problem to transfer photofiles from device: I got the message; The item could not be edited because you do not have sufficent access privileges or destination volume is no longer available." What can I do?

Ask the ACDSee Pro support personnel.
With iPhoto that message means the library is a referenced library (photo not copied when imported into iPhoto's structure) and the source file is not where it was when first added to the library. I don't know how ACDSee works. Does it have a referenced mode as opposed to copying photos into its structure?
OT

I have Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Lightroom on my MacBook Pro laptop. I bought an iMac and I'd like to move my installations to the larger display desktop for editing purposes. How can I go about transferring them?

I have Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Lightroom on my MacBook Pro laptop. I bought an iMac and I'd like to move my installations to the larger display desktop for editing purposes. How can I go about transferring them?

I have the same question. It seems that Adobe is almost impossible to contact (I ended up here at the forums to ask the same question).
I will never buy another Adobe product again if I can get another program to replace it. If this is customer service then it is NON EXISTENT!
I notice that your question has not been answered and why should you have to get the information from a forum? I know of no other company that makes you do this for simple product information.
NOT HAPPY with this version of arrogant customer service (nor am I happy about renting Photoshop products into the future - it is just a money grab in my opinion). I will be voting with my feet and going elsewhere in future.

How can I add a hyperlink to a PDF with OSX 10.9? The "Help" article says to use the "add link" feature under "edit." It's not there.

How can I add a hyperlink to a PDF with OSX 10.9? The "Help" article says to use the "add link" feature under "edit." It's not there. I could add links w/ the previous OS. Time sensitive project.

Which application are you using?
Clinton

Most of the top half of my Edit Menu in Safari is grayed out. How can I get it functioning again?

Yesterday and today the top half of my Edit Menu in Safari 5.1.10 is grayed out and unusable. I have tried everything I can think of including reinstalling Safari, repairing permissions, restarting. I am at a loss. Can someone tell me what to do to get the menu working again?

I'm replying to my own question - I have no idea what has changed in five hours, but I just logged on again to see if anyone had repllied to my question - and the problem is fixed! A total mystery to me, but thank you anyway. I think these discussions are of great help when you have a problem and no "guru" to go to. Thanks.

Can the mac mini i7, 8gigs ram, edit avchd 1920/1080p without having to convert it?

Can the mac mini i7, 8gigs ram, external FW800 drive, edit avchd 1920/1080p without having to convert it?
Can you scrub the TL at 5x speed and not have it stutter?

By default it converts it to ProRes 422, though you can specify other codecs.
Why convert it?
Although FCP X can handle AVCHD natively, AVCHD being a "delivery" codec is not really suitable for editing.
ProRes is designed specifically for ease of editing especially with complex effects and colour correction.
If your editing is going to be fairly basic you can get away with leaving your media as AVCHD.
Note also that an hour of ProRes is around 50GB !

Can the Quadro 2000 do HD editing?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for