Can two or more users access the same Airdisk at the same time?

I have a USB hard drive attached to my AEBS as a shared drive, and I can access it from any of my four macs. The problem is I have to disconnect from it on one mac before the other macs can access it. If I don't, the second mac receives an error that it doesn't have permissions. Is that normal?

you really should use eclipse and maven to work with multiple developers. something like [1] will be helpful
[1] http://www.cqblueprints.com/xwiki/bin/view/Blue+Prints/The+CQ+Project+Maven+Archetype

Similar Messages

Two or more users editing the same script file in cq5, is it possible?

In cq5 is possible two or more users editing the same jsp file? There is a lock system preventing simultaneous editing of the same file?
Thanks,
Gabriel

you really should use eclipse and maven to work with multiple developers. something like [1] will be helpful
[1] http://www.cqblueprints.com/xwiki/bin/view/Blue+Prints/The+CQ+Project+Maven+Archetype

Can two seperate login users on the same imac share songs movies etc...

we have two different users on the one imac - one user has a extensive itunes library the other has nothing is it possible to send playlist from the one user to the other user empty itunes library ?

Read this article and see if it helps.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1203?viewlocale=en_US
MJ

Can two copies of LR access the same library at the same time?

I am in a small studio with multiple Mac workstations and multiple copies of LR. We often have shoots where one person will work on photos from the reception of a wedding while another person works on the ceremony photos at the same time. So far we just export the XMP metadata to the DNG files when we are done working on one machine and import the XMP metadata of those files on the other computers to have the changes up to date.
Currently we are all using our own libraries. The only problem is that virtual copies do not transfer in this process.
Can we all use the same LR library at the same time to work on different parts of an event, and therefore all be able to see the virtual copies, collections, and other changes that we make to images including the images that we send to PSCS2 to further edit and then re-import?
Does anyone know if this will work, or will it bring about the end of the world as we know it?

Since the beta had it, under the name of "binders", it's something that's been thought out, put in, but pulled when the switch was made from collections to folders as the primary "keeper" of the images. So I feel there's good reason to expect it back at some point.
 
 One way or the other, it probably will not signal the end of the world!
 
 
John "McPhotoman"
 color="#800000" size="2">~~ John McWilliams
 
 
 
 MacBookPro 2 Ghz Intel Core Duo, G-5 Dual 1.8;
 Canon DSLRs

Can two or more devices use the same Apple account with different cell phone numbers. I want to use FaceTime on a my 5s and my wife wants her own FaceTime on a new iPad Air with its own cell number but be linked with me with iCloud to share music

I have a 5s with an apple account and wife has a iPad air with its own cell number. Does the iPad need it's own apple account to use it's own phone number so her FaceTime calls are not sent to my phone. We want to be able to link each device to iCloud and share music, photos, ect. iPad iMessage and FaceTime have my cell number activated.

How to use multiple iPods, iPads, or iPhones with one computer
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1495
How to Share a Family iPad
http://www.macworld.com/article/1163347/how_to_share_a_family_ipad.html
Using iPhone, iPad, or iPod with multiple computers
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1202
iOS & iCloud Tips: Sharing an Apple ID With Your Family
http://www.macstories.net/stories/ios-5-icloud-tips-sharing-an-apple-id-with-you r-family/
How To Best Use and Share Apple IDs across iPhones, iPads and iPods
http://www.nerdsonsite.com/blog/2012/06/07/help-im-appleid-confused/
 Cheers, Tom

Ipod Touch-WIFI Problems-Can't Connect More than One at Same time

I'm not an Ipod Touch user yet, but three family members are. Unfortunately, only one will connect to the Internet on our home wifi at a time. Each one works just fine on its own and will make the connection, but if one is already turned on it blocks the others. I have a laptop and it connects fine regardless of the Ipod Touch issues. I'm using a Linksys router if that matters. Looked everywhere but can't find someone experiencing similar issues. Thanks for any ideas/thoughts/help!

Take a look at your router's settings for DHCP. Normally there is range associated for the allocation of IP addresses for wireless devices. For example, you would set DHCP to on, IP address range from 192.168.1.10 to 192.168.1.128. The normal defaults on the router should have given you an adequate range of address but you may have inadvertently changed something.

Can two users access the same bootcamp (win os) instance?

We are two users who are using our imac and we both have own user names in mac os. I created a bootcamp partition with windows xp on it. Can both users access the same partition and create their own user spaces within xp?
Will that work also if we use Parallel or virtual box? (access the same user data as in boot camp?)
I would like to have the option for each user to access their windows data either through bootcamp or through the virtual tool.
Message was edited by: gss2
Message was edited by: gss2

gss2 wrote:
What do you mean Virtual box it will not run on its own partition? I have a virtual box running on my desktop and it runs just fine ...own partition?? I don't understand.
Running on its own partition means that the installed OS has its own formatted portion (partition) of the hard drive. A virtual machine does not have its own partition. It creates a virtual partition (a file on the computer) that simulates a file system (partition). So Virtual Box, or any other virtualization software, does not run Windows, or any other OS in its own partition.

How to avoid that two or more people alter the same Sales Order same time

I'm looking for a way to avoid that two or more people altering the same Sales Order at the same time.
If someone has entered a Sales Order in the system and something needs to be adjust it can be done by two or more people at the same time. The problem is that when someone is saving these changes, the changes of another person, who is still working on the same order, get lost.
So what we need is an alert that someone is already using this order and that no other person can make any changes at that time. So the order needs to be blocked for altering for any other person at that time.
To avoid this I think you have to do something with the Stored Procedure. Or has someone a more simple and better solution.
I've already put this thread in the Business One forum and someone suggested to put it in the Business One SDK forum, as there isn't a solution in Business One itself.
So if someone can give me a direction for a solution I would be very pleased.
Best regards,
Tim

Hi Tim,
The only thing that comes close to what you want in standard SBO is Data Ownership. However, this can't stop someone editing a document that is already being edited.
You can't use stored procedures to track which document is open because the SBO_SP_TransactionNotification proc (which is the only one that you are able to customise) is triggered when a document is updated or added (or cancelled or closed) and not when the document is actually being edited in the user-interface.
You could do this by writing an addon that uses the UI API to trap events in the sales order form. In theory, a sales order is being edited if the sales order form is in Update mode (ie in order for the form to be in Update mode, the user must have selected an existing document and changed the value of at least one field). You can trap the event of the user changing a value and then log the user and document in a table. When other users try to edit the same document, you could check the table and then prevent them changing values. When the first user clicks on the update button (or cancels the update or closes the form etc etc) you can remove the lock on the document. However, I have doubts as to how robust it would be. The problem with this kind of locking solution is that you sometimes get 'stranded' locks (eg user was editing a document when their workstation crashed) and the solution can end up being more troublesome than it is worth.
Kind Regards,
Owen

Error on Production Orders Add-on when 2 or more users at the same time.

Hi.
Our add-on creates special production orders (SAPbobsCOM.BoProductionOrderTypeEnum.bopotSpecial) with no problem when used by one user, but if there are two or more users everyone on his own SAPBO session it starts to throw different errors, we think it may be a concurrence problem due to several transactions.
Here a short brief of the code sample and the process:
(error handling and object members not included in the sample)
oDoc.ProductionOrderType = SAPbobsCOM.BoProductionOrderTypeEnum.bopotSpecial
If the oDoc.Add() is correct, We get the last production order created and release it:
Me.sKey = Me.Company.GetNewObjectKey
oDoc = Me.Company.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oProductionOrders)
oDoc.GetByKey(Me.sKey)
oDoc.ProductionOrderStatus = SAPbobsCOM.BoProductionOrderStatusEnum.boposReleased
oDoc.Update()
Then we go for an inventory Entry:
oDoc = Me.Company.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oInventoryGenEntry)
oDoc.DocDate = Date.Now
oDoc.Lines.BaseEntry = Me.sKey
oDoc.Add
And Finally to close the production order:
oDoc.ProductionOrderStatus = SAPbobsCOM.BoProductionOrderStatusEnum.boposClosed
oDoc.Update()
This works fine when only one user is using the add-on, but in the end there wil be at least eight users simultaneously working with this add-on
The test:
We have four users creating production orders with the add-on.
Two of them get the usual success messages and the created documents in SAPBO are all correct.
The other two users get diferrent errors messages during the process.
If they wait and try again to run the process it works fine.
Repeating the test get errors on different users depending on which one started the process first.
Our client needs to generate beetwen 900 and 1200 production orders per day, so they can't wait until the process is free for each user to work with it.
The common erros detected are:
Changing the status of the production order:
-5002 - The warehouse is not defined for the item.
-4002 - To generate this document,
first define the numbering series in the Administration module
-1029 - Field cannot be updated
Adding the production order and inventory entry:
-2038
-1116
-5002
Regards,
Omar Fonseca

The start transaction model didn't Fit well with all the process we are doing, but the idea of locking or holding the other users seems to work pretty fine, we are now using a flag to determine if someone is doing the process and put in hold the new ones.

What happens when multiple users access the same servlet?

Do the users share all the same resources? Or is a new process generated for each user? I have a servlet that builds a string to return to the user and I only have myself to test, so I can't really see what happens when many users access the servlet. Is there a possibility that the string will get screwed up, like when dealing with multiple threads, or do all the users get their own resources and I don't have to worry about that?

huh? if you can point a test servlet at it, you can point a browser at it (even if the servlet does not serve html it will run)
try pasting the servlet URL into a web browser
refreshing multiple browsers repeatedly could provide a manual test

2 iPods, 2 accounts but same music files, Can I point both users to the....

2 iPods, 2 accounts but same music files, Can I point both users to the same music files, or do I have to have a seperate copy on each user account?
Me and the wife both have an iPod, and Ive read there easier to manage if you use 2 user accounts.
However, can I store all my music MP3s in one place on the HDD, and just point each user account's iTunes to the one place?
Or do you have to have the music in each users folder?
Sorry Im brand new to Mac and an (ex) PC user
cheers

Maybe one of these two posts by me might clear it up for you a bit...
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6147718&#6147718
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6183084&#6183084
Check them out then come back with specific questions you might still have.
Patrick

How to avoid that two or more people altering the same Sales Order

I'm looking for a way to avoid that two or more people altering the same Sales Order at the same time.
If someone has entered a Sales Order in the system and something needs to be adjust it can be done by two or more people at the same time. The problem is that when someone is saving these changes, the changes of another person, who is still working on the same order, get lost.
So what we need is an alert that someone is already using this order and that no other person can make any changes at that time. So the order needs to be blocked for altering for any other person at that time.
To avoid this I think you have to do something with the Stored Procedure. Or has someone a more simple and better solution. So far I didn't find a standard option in Business One neither a solution in this forum.
Best regards,
Tim

Tim,
There is nothing in the application settings in Business One that could be used to prevent this. You may post this to the SDK forum as well and perhaps there is a way to achieve this through SDK.

ERROR: MyService.jws:715:There are two or more operations with the same schema-element 'ns0:MyNameSpace' on the input message in a web service file or callback interface.

I have two web service operations that have the same complex type as their input
parameter. I want to map this type to an existing schema. I can successfully
do this with the first operation using XQuery but when I attempt to do this with
the second operation I get the following error:
ERROR: MyService.jws:715:There are two or more operations with the same schema-element
'ns0:MyNamespace' on the input message in a web service file or callback interface.
ERROR: SUGGESTION: Use different schema-element values for each of those operations.
How can I use different schema-element values? The input parameters are to be
mapped to the same schema and same element since they are the same for both operations....

I am having the same problem. How did you resolve this..?? could you please tell me the solution??
Thanks
Shari

Can two subVI show up at the same time?

Can two subVI show up at the same time?

Hi,
Save the vi as a template (*.vit), then you can open it (dynamically) as
often as you want. If you make the vi "floating", you get the best results.
Regards,
Wiebe.
"smal" wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
> Hi,
> What if the subvi has to be called dynamically (hence using call by
> refrence node).
> In fact I want to run a subvi each time a button is clicked
> independent of the others(it gets just some parameters from the caller
> vi & must continue running so the user can interact with it via its
> front panel )
>
> Thanks for your attention in advance.

Is there a way to work with two or more app at the same time on iPhone or iPad

Is there a way to work with two or more app at the same time on iPhone or iPad?

What i am attempting to achieve is to work with at least two app at the same time. For example: select any picture from my albums to attach them in an email. Another example is get data from an app to use it with the calc app. And there are more exaples for it. And for sure I need support for an iPad air. I mencioned the other tablet just to try to be a bit clearer.

Can two or more users access the same Airdisk at the same time?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for