Can we disable Archive step in Approval process
Guys,
I wanted to know if I can disable Archive step in the Approval process. Right now the issue is I do not want the people to Archive the document by mistake.
1) Is there a way to disable the Archive step?
2) Or is there atleast a way to restrict it based on roles?
Please help me.
Thanks a lot,
Deepak
Hi,
you cannot configure anything on the Approval process.
If you want to change something you need either modify the standard (if you get the source code) or develop your own process.
The only things you can try, if remove or restrict UI commands.
There are several UI command groups involved.
For example there is the StatemanagementMassGroup with the command statemanagement_archive_mass inside. This you could remove, so that in the layout sets where this group is used, the archive command is gone (e.g. AdminExplorer menu)
But the StatemanagementGroup command group is just a java class and references no commands. So you cannot get rid of the single archive command from the resource context menu. But maybe it is enough for you to remove the whole command group and do approval actions only from a mass menu.
I guess thats the only thing without developing which can be done here.
Regards,
Sascha
Similar Messages
-
Invoce. N-step dynamic approval process
Hello,
I have a question.
According documentation we have BADI ONLY for SC workflow
and PO workflow.(BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI)
I need N-step dynamic approval process for Invoice.
The question is : do i need to develop my own workflow or is there other functionality or BADI which i can use for INVOICE?
Thank you.
TaniaHi Hari,
The total value of the shopping cart changes because Manager 1 deletes an item from the shopping cart. So the new value of the shopping cart is 10.000,- euro. In this example all managers must approve up to and including the first one who has an limit higher than the shopping cart value.
Regards,
Martin -
How can I disable speed step technology on my HP laptop?
hi all
I have DV7 1273cl hp laptop (Core 2 Duo 2.0 GHz CPU )
how can I disable speed step technology on my hp laptop ?
(I didn`t find CPU settings in BIOS , is there a special hotkey for CPU settings? )
thanks in advanceHello krishna22211, welcome to the HP Forums.
I see that you're looking to disable the NVIDIA graphics. I will try to assist you with this.
Here is the latest BIOS update for your notebook :
HP Notebook System BIOS Update (Intel Processors).
If you update and the option is not there to disable/enable, to still try and minimize power consumption of the NVIDIA GPU, you could try any of the following:
Disable the drivers in Device Manager, or uninstall it.
Go into the NVIDIA control center and reduce the settings from in there.
Create a power custom power plan, that reduces power for graphics.
I hope this is able to help.
Thank you for posting on the HP Forums.
I worked on behalf of HP. -
Change Status of archived document after approval process
hi how can we change the status of an archived document in KM after it has gone thru the approval process.
the reason once we archive we cannot resubmit the document for approval.
thanksHi Venu,
have a look under System Administration - System Configuration -- Knowledge Management -- Configuration --Content Management -- User Interface -- Commands -- UI Command Groups -- StatemanagementGroup.
See Java class: com.sapportals.wcm.rendering.uicommand.cm.UIStatemanagementGroupCommand. Take the class and decompile this and everything needed around to understand how this class works.
Then you can choose to extend this CommandGroup to also have a command "Resubmit for Approval" or you can implement your own UI Command only for resubmitting (you will also have to activate your command (group) by settings within the configuration).
On the other hand, if all this is completely new to you, I'm a bit sceptical if the task isn't a bit too big as a first task on KM implementation topics...?
Hope it helps
Detlev -
Multi-step content approval process
Dear All,
We have a requirement like this:
A content (after it has been authored) has to go through an n-step approval process. In our requirement, suppose if the 3rd approver rejects the content, then it should go back to the 2nd approver. But if we use SAP's built-in approval process, if any approver rejects the content, it goes back to the Content Author.
Any idea to solve this issue?
Please share the code if you have.
Kind regards,
Sreejesh.Hi Sreejesh,
the requirement in my eyes doesn't give much sense: What should the 2nd approver do with the content rejected by the third approver?! To approve makes no sense, for he knows that the 3rd approver would reject again. And to reject "makes sense" - anyhow, this is already implemented...
So, beneath the question of the usefulness of the requirement, you may implement your own reject command which does exactly what you expect. This probably would mean a modification of the standard behaviour.
Hope it helps
Detlev -
Two step Leave Approval Process
Dear All Gurus,
Please help me in this ESS issue. I am facing this issue in ESS Leave Request Application which I will explain with following scenarios.
I have employees Ram and Sham Reporting to Ajay.
1. Line Manager of Ram and sham is Ajay
2. Line Manager of Ajay is Mohan.
Ram has applied leave which came to Ajay inbox for approval. Ajay couldnu2019t able to see it so it went for an escalation to Mohan (who is line manager of Ajay).
Now Ajay donu2019t have Ram request in his UWL and as well as in his SAP Business workplace inbox.
Now Sham has applied leave which again went to Ajay ((who is line manager of Sham).this time Ajay saw the one sham request in his UWL and when he tries to approve it he is getting one more screen in which he is seeing Ram and sham request in the table.
When Ram request already went to mohan why it is coming in the absence table list under the request of sham??
Please help me in solving the same.
Regards
Priya LathaHi Priya,
I would suggest you to post your query in the below forum so that HR functional experts can respond to your query...
ERP HCM Employee Self-Service
Thanks,
Jagadish. -
How can I disable 2 step Verification on Thunderbird
I have been trying and trying for hours to remove the 2 step verification from my computer. Every time I open my email I put in my password and then a minute later I get the message 'Sending of password for user *my username* did not succeed. Mail server *Server name* responded: Authentication failed.' Then it asks me to enter a new password or retry. But, clicking either option will just cause the entire thing to repeat itself. I'm sick and tired of not being able to get my messages on my computer and just and to get rid of the 2 step Verification. And, please, I'm not a computer person, I need STEP by STEP instructions on how to do this.
Sorry, I didn't realize this was a duplicate of an earlier question: https://support.mozilla.org/questions/1031969
Let's continue there instead. -
Approver skipped during approval process in N-step BADI workflow
Hi,
I am some problem in n-step BADI approval process. For some reasons one of the approvers is skipping during approval. And later in the approval preview it observes that the approver, who is just above the skipped approver, is appeared twice.
I am not able to simulate this issue though this is happening in the system frequesntly though it is not for all.
Can you please let me know what is the problem in the system and how can we rectify this issue?
Thank You.
Regards,
KrishHello
sorry search for the n-step WS14500015 is the item based...
Another thing, you can try with testing to restrict the case to special conditions. Are there any added-approver there? Is there any approver who makes some changes to the SC? etc..
Daniel -
Approval Process within SAP MDM
Can SAP MDM workflow handle multiple approval process. Is MDM support looping mechanism?
Hi Rajesh,
If approver rejects the records then the workflow will go back to previous step also u can branch the workflow on the basis of approve/disprove i.e. if the records approve then to a step and if approved then to a default step by using Branch.The record will be in MDM .The workflow history can be seen in data manager.And to have a report u can make a application. The link shows hw to have the history.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/001d22fb-622d-2b10-22ac-998acecf68a8
The history will give complete report about approve/reject.
Rgds
Ankit -
How to set up approval process for test case in SAP solution manager?
Hi Experts,
We need to setup a 2 level approval process for test case documents in SAP Solution Manager.
e.g. If test case document is uploaded for transaction "MM01" then first it will go to Reviewer1. Once Reviewer1 approves it , should go to Reviewer2.
Adn finally once reviewer2 approves it , it will be complete.
What are the required configurations and steps for approval process setup? It will be helpful if screenshots and detailed steps are provided.
Thanks.
regards,
SanjanaHi,
the above requirement we are going develop add on.below code is there. in this code how we can set for line level amount instead of document total amount
Private Function GetCondition(ByVal sCondition As String) As ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum
Try
Select Case sCondition
Case "Deviation from Credit Limit"
Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctDeviationFromCreditLine)
Case "Deviation from Commitment"
Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctDeviationFromObligo)
Case "Gross Profit %"
Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctGrossProfitPercent)
Case "Discount %"
Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctDiscountPercent)
Case "Deviation from Budget"
Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctDeviationFromBudget)
Case "Total Document"
Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctTotalDocument)
End Select
Catch ex As Exception
MsgBox(ex.Message())
End Try
End Function
Please guide me.
Regds,
Samapth Kumar. -
Step Group , Monitoring Process and Integration Process.
Hi Experts,
I would like to when we use Step Group, Monitoring Process and what is the difference of these two with Integration Process. As we can use all the steps of Integration Process with Step Goup and Monitoring Process.
Regards,
SyedFor the Step Group:
You can consider it as a BPM which can be used in another BPM....concept similar to a reusable class :)....So if you have a constant patter of Receive --- transformation -
Send in some BPMs then create a Step Group and include it in the required BPMs...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/42/ef868be2753268e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
Regards,
Abhishek. -
Approved invoices can not be edited - Approval process
Hi Experts -
I have recently raised an incident with SAP about Approval process - the complete message and support reply is as follows - but i believe we need a change in the approval process - if the approval required is only one but you have defined two people (Either or OR) in the approver list - the system should allow the document to be edited if one of the approvers reject it.
please let me know and i believe we need a change in design - unless otherwise a solid reason is given to justify the existing design
10.07.2009 10:32 Description (English) by SRS Manian
We have created approval procedure for all the invoices which are entered into the system., The
'Accts' user enters the invoice into the system - the invoice comes for approval to 'Manager' user.
When the Manager opens the invoice via Alert window - he/she wants to modify certain information
(lines as well as Sales person) and approve it.
The invoice which gets opened from the alert window - does not allow the user 'Manager' to modify at
all. All the information on the invoice are greyed out.
The system should allow the user 'Manager' to modify the information. Since the manager has full
authorization to the system.
10.07.2009 10:35 Info to Reporter by SAP
Dear Partner/Customer,
We have received your inquiry and are currently processing it.
You will be contacted with a solution or an update as soon as possible.
For further details regarding the phase your message is in at the
moment please refer to:
http://service.sap.com/%7Esapidb/011000358700000575782007E
Kind regards,
SAP Business One Product Support
10.07.2009 10:59 Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian,
Thank you for contacting us.
When the originator sends the document for manager's approval, note that the at that stage, the document is still in the 'Approval Process'. This is because the system is waiting for the 'Manager' to 'Approve or Reject' the document. Hence, looking at the Document, it is still in 'Draft - Pending' Status.
When the document is in 'Draft-Pending' Status, the document is not available for editing, because the system considers that it is still in the waiting process. In your case, the manager cannot edit t he document.
To amend the document, an action is required from the approver either to reject it first. Once rejected, it can be amended and re-sent for approval.
I have checked our knowledge base and noted that there is an article which describes the approval process. Please refer to the Expert on Phone Wiki Article (March 2009) with title: Why a draft documen t in an approval process cannot be modified by the originator?
The link will provide the explanation:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/pages/viewpage.action&pageid=88735894
I have also attached Notes 1321234 and 1111431 for your reference.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
10.07.2009 11:59 Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Thanks for the reply. The scenario is when the Manager receives the
document for approval, he wanted to edit and add it. Your reply (and
documentations) states that it needs to be rejected first before it is
available for editing. When it is gets rejected - the person who
orignated the document gets an alert and he can edit it. Here the
Manager must get an alert so that he can edit the Rejected document.
When the 'manager' rejects the document, and goes back to the alert
window to open the document - it is still greyed out !!
How does the 'manager' reject the document and edits it ?
regards
Manian
10.07.2009 12:11 Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian,
If after the Manager rejects it and still the document is not editable (greyed out), it means that the document may still be in the 'Approval Process'. When it is greyed out, what is the status of the document in the header? Does it say 'Rejected' or 'Pending'?
If it is still in 'Pending' mode, please verify the number of 'Approvers' set in the 'Stages' tab of the 'Approval Template - Setup' window. If there is more than one user listed as 'Approver', and o nly 1 approval is required, the system provides an opportunity to other 'Approvers' to approve or reject the document. If in your case, the number of approvers is 2, and manager 'rejected' it, the sys tem still keeps the document in Pending status as it waits for another approver's decision to reject or approve it.
Also, verify the number of 'Approvals' required. If the number of 'Approvers' who have not rendered their decision is greater than or equal to the 'Approvals' required (e.g. approvers - 2, required ap provals - 2) the system keeps the document within the approval process. This is to allow the other 'Approvers' to decide on the document.
I hope this clarifies the behaviour. If you can provide us a step by step screenshot of the issue, this may help us to provide a more accurate response.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
10.07.2009 12:28 Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Hi:
The status of the document in the Header says 'Pending' and the status
below the document number says 'Suspended' - it is not showing as 'Draft'
Regards
Manian
10.07.2009 12:42 Call to Customer / Partner by SAP
Performed on: 10.07.2009 10:41:59 (UK)
Contact person: SRS Manian
Status of discussion: Customer not reached
Subject:
Called the partner but currently engaged on another line.
Would like to hold a webex.
10.07.2009 12:42 Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian,
I'm trying to call you but there was no response on your mobile.
When the header says 'Pending', then it means the document is still within the approval process. Please check the Approval Template and see the number of approvers and the number of approvals require d.
The number of approvals and approvers may be greater than 1. In this case, the system waits for other approvers to approve or reject the document. Once all the approvers have rejected the document, th en the document will be released and available for editing.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
10.07.2009 18:11 Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Hi:
Thanks for the reply - i tried this and found out the following:
1 - In the approval templates - we had mentioned number of approvals
required as '1'.
2 - in the number of approvers - we had mentioned two users
Though the template requires only one approvals (Either or OR) the system
expects both of them to approve or reject -
Can u please let me why is this behaving like this - or is this is the
way it is designed ? - if this is the way it is designed - i beleive it
is wrong - weneed to give a solution to the customer
regards
Manian
11.07.2009 05:52 Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian,
Thank you for the information. The behaviour is a current system definition documented as per Note 1321234. I have attached the said Note for your reference. When only 1 approval is required and there are 2 or more persons are allowed to approve the document, the document does not get automatically rejected when 1 person 'rejects' it. The system waits for other approvers to render their decision b ecause a person may still approve or reject the document.
The design is not an application error. If you would like to change this design, please post your requirement in our SAP Business One Product Development Collaboration
forum. You can find the forum in this link:
/community [original link is broken]
The forum is beingmoderated by members of the Solution Management team specialized in certain areas, according to the folder you are in. Partners can impact the design of specific features by posting suggestions and feedback at this forum. Kindly refer to Note 1028874 which describes more on the above process.
As the request will be handled through another process, we kindly request that this support message be closed.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
SAP Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
11.07.2009 09:02 Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Hi Thanks for the reply - however, the solution given doesnot address the
problem we are beingfaced with our client
Is there a Development Request we can raise so that this problem is
addressed in future
I am going ahead and confirming this Message though
regards
Manian
11.07.2009 10:04 Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian,
Thanks for the information. I understand the customer's requirement. As previously mentioned, please log a development request in this link:
/community [original link is broken] This is from Note 1028874.
Unfortunately,we at the support centre does not have access to the list of development requests. Hence, kindly follow the process in Note 1028874.
I'm sending the message back to your side for confirmation.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
SAP Notes
Number Short text
0001035200
Issue can be solved via existing documentation
0001111431
Deleting rejected draft documents.
0001167635
Maintenance Policy (L)
0001321234
Status of a document rejected within the Approval Process.Hi Gordon - thanks for the reply - i am sorry i never realized that the message i raised could be messed up like this - the following is a clear message with some paragraphs:
Hi Experts - I have recently raised an incident with SAP about Approval process - the complete message and support reply is as follows - but i believe we need a change in the approval process - if the approval required is only one but you have defined two people (Either or OR) in the approver list - the system should allow the document to be edited if one of the approvers reject it. please let me know and i believe we need a change in design - unless otherwise a solid reason is given to justify the existing design
SRS Manian We have created approval procedure for all the invoices which are entered into the system., The 'Accts' user enters the invoice into the system - the invoice comes for approval to 'Manager' user. When the Manager opens the invoice via Alert window - he/she wants to modify certain information (lines as well as Sales person) and approve it. The invoice which gets opened from the alert window - does not allow the user 'Manager' to modify at all. All the information on the invoice are greyed out. The system should allow the user 'Manager' to modify the information. Since the manager has full authorization to the system.
Reply to Reporter by SAP Dear Manian,
Thank you for contacting us. When the originator sends the document for manager's approval, note that the at that stage, the document is still in the 'Approval Process'. This is because the system is waiting for the 'Manager' to 'Approve or Reject' the document. Hence, looking at the Document, it is still in 'Draft - Pending' Status. When the document is in 'Draft-Pending' Status, the document is not available for editing, because the system considers that it is still in the waiting process. In your case, the manager cannot edit t he document. To amend the document, an action is required from the approver either to reject it first. Once rejected, it can be amended and re-sent for approval. I have checked our knowledge base and noted that there is an article which describes the approval process. Please refer to the Expert on Phone Wiki Article (March 2009) with title: Why a draft documen t in an approval process cannot be modified by the originator? The link will provide the explanation:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/pages/viewpage.action&pageid=88735894
I have also attached Notes 1321234 and 1111431 for your reference. Best regards, Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland 10.07.2009 11:59
Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Thanks for the reply.
The scenario is when the Manager receives the document for approval, he wanted to edit and add it. Your reply (and documentations) states that it needs to be rejected first before it is available for editing. When it is gets rejected - the person who orignated the document gets an alert and he can edit it. Here the Manager must get an alert so that he can edit the Rejected document. When the 'manager' rejects the document, and goes back to the alert window to open the document - it is still greyed out !! How does the 'manager' reject the document and edits it ? regards Manian
Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian, If after the Manager rejects it and still the document is not editable (greyed out), it means that the document may still be in the 'Approval Process'. When it is greyed out, what is the status of the document in the header? Does it say 'Rejected' or 'Pending'? If it is still in 'Pending' mode, please verify the number of 'Approvers' set in the 'Stages' tab of the 'Approval Template - Setup' window. If there is more than one user listed as 'Approver', and o nly 1 approval is required, the system provides an opportunity to other 'Approvers' to approve or reject the document. If in your case, the number of approvers is 2, and manager 'rejected' it, the sys tem still keeps the document in Pending status as it waits for another approver's decision to reject or approve it. Also, verify the number of 'Approvals' required. If the number of 'Approvers' who have not rendered their decision is greater than or equal to the 'Approvals' required (e.g. approvers - 2, required ap provals - 2) the system keeps the document within the approval process. This is to allow the other 'Approvers' to decide on the document. I hope this clarifies the behaviour. If you can provide us a step by step screenshot of the issue, this may help us to provide a more accurate response.
Best regards,
Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland
Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Hi: The status of the document in the Header says 'Pending' and the status below the document number says 'Suspended' - it is not showing as 'Draft'
Regards
Manian 10.07.2009 12:42
Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian,
I'm trying to call you but there was no response on your mobile. When the header says 'Pending', then it means the document is still within the approval process. Please check the Approval Template and see the number of approvers and the number of approvals require d. The number of approvals and approvers may be greater than 1. In this case, the system waits for other approvers to approve or reject the document. Once all the approvers have rejected the document, th en the document will be released and available for editing.
Best regards,
Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland
Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Hi: Thanks for the reply - i tried this and found out the following: 1 - In the approval templates - we had mentioned number of approvals required as '1'. 2 - in the number of approvers - we had mentioned two users Though the template requires only one approvals (Either or OR) the system expects both of them to approve or reject - Can u please let me why is this behaving like this - or is this is the way it is designed ? - if this is the way it is designed - i beleive it is wrong - weneed to give a solution to the customer
regards
Manian
Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian,
Thank you for the information. The behaviour is a current system definition documented as per Note 1321234. I have attached the said Note for your reference. When only 1 approval is required and there are 2 or more persons are allowed to approve the document, the document does not get automatically rejected when 1 person 'rejects' it. The system waits for other approvers to render their decision because a person may still approve or reject the document.
The design is not an application error. If you would like to change this design, please post your requirement in our SAP Business One Product Development Collaboration forum.
You can find the forum in this link:
/community [original link is broken]
The forum is being moderated by members of the Solution Management team specialized in certain areas, according to the folder you are in. Partners can impact the design of specific features by posting suggestions and feedback at this forum.
Kindly refer to Note 1028874 which describes more on the above process.
As the request will be handled through another process, we kindly request that this support message be closed. Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
Lorna Real Support Consultant SAP Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland
Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Hi Thanks for the reply - however, the solution given does not address the problem we are being faced with our client Is there a Development Request we can raise so that this problem is addressed in future I am going ahead and confirming this Message though
regards
Manian
Reply to Reporter by SAP Dear Manian,
Thanks for the information. I understand the customer's requirement. As previously mentioned, please log a development request in this link:
/community [original link is broken]
This is from Note 1028874.
Unfortunately, we at the support centre does not have access to the list of development requests. Hence, kindly follow the process in Note 1028874. I'm sending the message back to your side for confirmation.
Best regards,
Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland -
Approval process to disable user
Hi,
I need to have an approval process before disabling the user and the approver not being user's manager.I am not quite sure as how to implement it. Please guide.
ThanksHi All,
Can we use the Request API to create the request (and then Approval) for other than ADD (object type like Disable, Enable etc) of a user like below
long lRequestKey;
long UserKey=1;
long ObjectKey=201; //testro1
HashMap reqMap = new HashMap();
reqMap.put("Requests.Target Type", "U");
reqMap.put("Requests.Object Request Type", "Disable");
reqMap.put("Requests.Type", "U");
lRequestKey = reqObj.createRequest(reqMap);
System.out.println("Created request and got key :" + lRequestKey);
reqObj.addRequestUser(lRequestKey, UserKey);
System.out.println("Added the request user");
reqObj.addRequestObject(lRequestKey, ObjectKey); // I am not sure if this part is right but without this it is giving me the error.
System.out.println("Added the request object");
reqObj.completeRequestCreation(lRequestKey);
System.out.println(Completed and submitted the request");
I gave it a try but the Resource detail is not getting populated in the request due to which request hang up in "Request Initialized" state. I tried by passing the Process Instance Key also but no luck.
Any chance if anyone crack it before. Please tell me. Thanks -
How to determine N Step Approval process through Process Controlled workflow
HI
For SC approval process after 4th level of approval the workflow keep go N step till the approval determine. If no approval find then go for WF Exceptions.
In PCW we have process level like 100, 200, 300 and so on. What would be the procedure for Nth process level determination in SRM process controlled workflows settings.
Regards
KharabelaHi,
From SRM 7.0 PCW, requestor of SC or creator(buyer) of the PO can't be in the approval list.. this is standard...
create two custom events like zev_po_schema_eva and zev_po_sl_approval
create two custom expression.. one with constants as zev_po_schema_def and other one is formula interpreter(0FB001)..
assign zev_po_schema_eva as schema evaluation for PO.. MAKE SURE YOU LINK THE zev_po_sl_approval
with as zev_po_schema_def..
now create schema definition entry and specify as zev_po_schema_def..
now create process level
100 approval / approval with completion ( Your chooice ) .. maintain zev_po_sl_approval as evaluation id in the process level... maintain RR_SPENDING_LIMIT_APPROVER as Resp.Resolver...
maintain formula interperter value as (OV_SC_PREVAPPROVALIMI < 0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE ) AND (OV_SC_SPNDNGLMTFRQST < 0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE).
Saravanan -
Itunes Match won't upload. I get error stating there was an error in the itunes store, please try again. I have tried again everyday for the last month and am still unable to use. Any ideas on why Match can't complete the 1st step of the process (Gathering information about your Itunes library)?
JohnCullison wrote:
For the last few weeks, the iTunes store has been displayed with empty graphic rectangles (with a blue box containing a white question mark centered in the rectangles), bits of text, and some buttons. The page extends quite a ways, including what I assume would be all the links to all the music...
If all you are trying to do is buy music, you can easily buy MP3s at any online music download store (e.g. amazon.com) and add them to your iTunes library.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Re:No release of production order without standard cost estimate
Hello Experts I do not want to release any production order without standard cost estimate I have come acroos the same problem raised by some other users and can you please suggest how to achieve this? Is there any way to achieve this without user ex
-
Can I install Windows xp with SP2 with Bootcamp?
I purchase Windows xp with SP2 and want to install in on my Mac with Bootcamp. I keep getting a message that "The installer disc could not be found." I allocated 100gb for windows but can't do anything, once this stops the install process.
-
Choosing MacBookPro for garage band and music applications.
Hi to all, this is my 1st post I'm looking to buy my first mac: the MacBook Pro. With this computer I would like to install some music software (the main are Garageband, Finale and Band in a box) and connect my digital piano with an external fire-wir
-
Hi All, All other reports such as AR Invoice, Credit Note etc etc work without issue but when i try to preview an Outgoing Payment document i get a Database login window- but this window has the Server Name and database fields greyed out so no chance
-
Runtime Behavior in a Logical database
Hi all, I read this articl in SAP's help [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/9f/db9bb935c111d1829f0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm] but I didn't know how to use these Subroutines: FORM par_VAL. FORM selop_VAL. FORM selop-LOW_VAL. FORM selop-HIGH_V