Can you daisy chain two Compact DAQ systems together?

Greetings everyone,
I have a signal conditioning application and I have been looking at the Compact DAQ Platform as a solution.
I have a total of 16 TC's channels, a few DIO and a few Analog Out requirements.
I can basicly meet these needs with a single cDAQ system but I would like to have room to expand more in the future.
Does anyone know if it is possible daisy chain more than one cDAQ system together or if it woudl be very difficult to program and run two seperate DAQ systems from my computer.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Thomas

alkaline3mc wrote:
NI, the home of dead links.... 
You probably noticed that these posts were written 9 years ago...
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

Similar Messages

  • Can I daisy chain two Thunderbolt displays to the new MacBook Airs (July 2011)?

    I have last year's MacBook Air -- probably the best Mac I've ever had and I've had a few. I looked at using multiple displays last year, but the reviews for the major 3rd-party solutions really demonstrate how little is possible.
    I see Apple says you can double up on displays for the MacBook Pro (I have a pre-Thunderbolt one unfortunately), what about the new (July 2011) MacBook Airs?
    Anyone tried? Anyone know?
    (I have a 30" Dell display, but it is, and always has been, very flakey when it comes to connecting to a Mac laptop).

    You can thank Intel for that.
    The sandy bridge chips all have integrated graphics, and before they were released -- they took nvidia to court claiming they didn't have a "license" to make GPU chipsets for the sandy bridge line.  Intel won, and consumers lost.
    The solution most manufacturers are using for notebooks is graphics switching (nvidia optimus like technology) -- which basically uses a discreet GPU along side the intel integrated GPU, and switches between the two instantaenously based on the workload and \ or battery life -- this is how the macbook pro's with the ATI gpus work.
    Since there isn't enough space physically inside a macbook air for a discreet GPU, and since no company in the world is allowed to make a shared GPU for intel's sandy bridge chipsets -- the only solution is to use the integrated graphics that is in the processors -- Intel HD 3000.  Intel basically has the monopoly here...there is no legal solution in the world another company can provide thanks to our wonderful court system
    Wanna know the really sad part about the Intel HD 3000 GPU?  The Nvidia 320M (the GPU used in the previous model 2010 macbook air -- chip was released to the market in April of last year) actually out performs it in some benchmarks -- that's right, a 1+ year old shared gpu from nvidia outperforms Intel's 2011 integrated graphics.
    Intel ***** at graphics, period.
    The only other solution I can think of is for you to get the "Echo Express" product from Sonnet:
    http://www.sonnettech.com/product/thunderbolt/index.html
    It's basically an external bay that will allow you to put a PCIe GPU inside it, and it would then connect via thunderbolt to the macbook air.
    You would then use the minidisplayport connectors on the PCIe GPU to connect to the apple displays -- I believe any modern ATI or Nvidia GPU can support up to 3 or 4 external displays.
    Unfortunately, sonnet's bay is not released yet, and you'd also have to make sure the PCIe GPU you get supports both thunderbolt AND os x....so yeah, kind of slim pickens right now
    EDIT:
    So apparently the macbook pros can daisy chain two thunderbolt displays -- Apple has a picture of it on their site:
    http://storeimages.apple.com/1867/as-images.apple.com/is/image/AppleInc/MC914_AV 7?wid=1200&hei=1200&fmt=jpeg&qlt=95&op_sharpen=0&resMode=bicub&op_usm=0.5,0.5,0, 0&iccEmbed=0&layer=comp
    I just bought a new mac air too...I was gonna get a mbpro but they are just too expensive -- the one I configured was at around 3000$
    Wanna know what's lame about using the thunderbolt display with the mac air?  So the new mac air has the magsafe connector on one side and the thunderbolt connector on the other -- they're not on the same side like the macbook pro is (see picture) -- so basically the cable is going to have to slack around the back of the macbook air -- who designed that?  Must have been smoking some good meth ;p
    Message was edited by: NiqueXyZ

  • Can You Daisy Chain Firewire 400 and 800 Mixed?

    I would like to purchase an External Drive. I'm looking at a FW800. What I'm wondering is, Can I daisy chain devices mixed in.
    I Want to run a FW800 Bilingual cable from my Powerbook to the External Enclosure. From the Ext. Enclosure, I'd like to have take my second FW800 port and take a cable that converts Firewire 800 to Firewire 400 and plug in another item. Is this possible?
    Can I mix and match FW devices using separate protocol in a daisy chain configuration?

    Russ,
    Yes, it is possible. I have a drive that works on FW800, FW400, or USB2. Connected to the second FW800 port on that, I have an adaptor cable, a FW400 cable to a FW400 drive, and another FW400 drive connected to that . All 3 drives are on the desktop of my PowerBook. When I read your post, I had the only first drive connected to the iBook with USB2.
    The only problem I've run into was trying to copy a 200G drive on FW800 to a 250G drive on the FW400 port on the PowerBook. Working overnight, it managed to copy ONE Gigabyte! I hooked them up as they are now, and copied the whole shebang in about 45 minutes
    I picked up an empty drive case, 800/400/USB2 combo from OWC and a 250G Maxtor drive at CompUSA for about $100 less than I could get a 250 FW800 drive anyplace. http://www.macsales.com

  • How many FW devices can you daisy chain?

    Have a new iMac w/ one FW800 port. Need to daisy chain eight FW800 hard drives, two FW400 hard drives, and one FW400 DigiDesign Digi002 ProTools mixing board. I was planning on daisy chaining all the FW800 drives then coming out of the last of those with a FW800 to FW400 cable into the first FW400 drive, daisy chaining to the 2nd FW400 drive, then daisy chain from it into the FW400 ProTools mixing board. I know that's a lot of chaining but at the moment those are the devices I have to work with. I have A LOT of video and audio information I need to retain. Seems to me that I read somewhere about a maximum length a firewire daisy chain could be but haven't found any more reference to it when I just looked. All of the devices have their own power supplies so I don't believe they will be drawing much, if any power from the chain. Anybody know of any problems with this setup?

    Thanks for the info.
    I've tried several scenarios and combinations what I've found is that I can put all the FW800 drives in a daisy chain then put the 1st FW400 drive in and lastly the Digi002 mixing board (which is FW400). When I try to add to this any more drives I get unpredictable results. I have therefore bough another 2TB external drive and hooked it up through USB 2.0 and copied many files to it from the older FW400 drives as well as the only FW800 drive that ever game me headaches. It should be noted that it is a Western Digital My Book drive. It seems like it would be a great drive having FW800, FW400, and USB 2.0 connections. In practice, however, I have had LOTS of problems both on my Macs and PCs I tried using it on. I recommend strongly that you avoid using any MY Book drives. I'm having better luck with practically any other manufacturer, including what I would normally consider no names like SimpleTech and Buffalo. Those drives seem much more stable.

  • Mac Mini 2009 - Can't daisy chain two FW800 drives

    I have two FW800 enclosures with 3.5-inch drives and external power.
    Each one mounts individually when connected to the Mini FW800 port but when I daisy-chain them the second one in the chain doesn't mount and is not seen by disk utility.
    Those enclosures use an Oxford UF934DSB chipset.
    What's ironic that I had a FW400 enclosure daisy chained to one FW800 enclosure until this afternoon and that daisy-chain worked fine.
    Somewhere on the net there was an article that the daisy-chaining had to be done in a certain sequence, ie Mac FW to top FW port on first external, then from bottom of first FW enclosure to top of second and so forth.
    I always though the FW ports were just wired in parallel.
    Well, this is interesting - since these new FW800 enclosures also have one FW400 port as well, I just connected the second one using the FW400 ports and now they both mount.
    But now the whole chain only runs at FW400 speeds.
    Anyone else come across this problem or better yet, what is the solution to get both daisy-chained FW800 drives to mount.
    The enclosures are Rosewell, the drive in each a 1.5 TB WD green.

    I don't think it has anything to do with the power supply.
    The two enclosures are identical and react (work or not) exactly the same when I interchange them or the FW cable.
    They also work flawlessly if I connect the second one using FW400 instead of FW800. Would just trying to get the enclosure to mount with FW800 draw more current than when mounting with FW400 to put the power brick over the edge? I doubt it.
    A few other things I'm going to try - I do this when I have a few extra minutes since I can't afford to spend my time on this continuously.
    1. See if there is a F'W update for the enclosure and/or the Oxford chip.
    2. Talk to the Oxford and enclosure support people
    3. Update to 10.6.4, I'm on 10.6.2 right now
    4. Do a bit more digging on the net to see how others got the FW800 daisy-chaining working.
    The two enclosures react the same when I try each one separately and also when I switch them around. Whatever the problem is, it affects both equally so it's not some defect on one of them.
    With the rest of the testing I have done, I'm now pretty sure it's a Mac software problem.
    Although I would have thought someone else would have this problem as well but I can't even find any discussion on daisy-chaining with this chipset when running OS 10.6.
    There is a 15-digit number in disk utility called connection ID.
    I assume that is the Firewire ID number that some threads I read refer to.
    That ID is the same for the two FW800 ports and the FW400 port on each enclosure but it's different for the two enclosures, so some conflict there is definitely not the issue.
    So far I couldn't find what the latest issue of firmware is for the Oxford chip set, but I copied all the information that comes up with the firewire hardware listing so when I find the information I can check it against the firmware issue on my two units.
    Now, another interesting tidbit - some people say they had to power up the enclosure a few times occasionally to get a single drive to mount.
    I never had that problem, a single FW800 drive always mounted right away, but I decided to try that with the daisy-chained drive.
    So I turned the power switch on that second drive off and then on again...and lo and behold - doesn't it mount now........
    But that is not the interesting tidbit........the tidbit is when I check back in the Mini Firewire hardware listing.
    Whereas before it showed all the expected detail with either drive when connected individually via FW800, now with both FW800 drives connected I get this:
    *FireWire Bus:*
    *Warning: Unable to list FireWire devices.*
    *Maximum Speed: Up to 800 Mb/sec*
    ....and oooops - both FW800 drives just disconnected by themselves.
    Sure seems to point to a Mac software issue.
    And if you google for "Warning: Unable to list FireWire devices." you get pages of hits - many on Leopard but also a fair share on SL.
    I updated the software to 10.6.4 - still the same problem.
    Daisy-chain with FW400 is fine, with FW800 the second drive in the chain - doesn't matter which one it is, won't mount.

  • Can you daisy chain 2, 3 or more Core Duo Minis VTech style?

    I'm interested in the mini(s) if I can daisy chain them to spread the workload on various minis....much like System X in Virginia Tech. I'm trying to use my $2K budget the best way possible.
    If not, can I at least run logic on one and use the other as a node? If so, do I need to consider how much memory EACH has, or just the main mini?
    Thanks in advance.
    SX

    Well, if 2 nodes is all you need you'll probably be fine using just the Giga Ethernet. Just pick the tracks with more processing to do if your nodes aren't working hard enough. More info...well you can find it in the Logic forums....what else do you need to know? You'll want a Router or just use 1 on FW and 1 on Ethernet. You just need to to network them, create a private network (noone else needs access to them). Install the node app as a startup item. Leave it running for weeks at a time.
    If that's all you need it for then start with 1 GB and make sure you can follow upgrading procedures. I am pretty sure it is only recommended that you install in pairs, if you buy 2 1 GB sticks put one in each and leave the factory sticks in the other slot you should be OK.

  • Can I daisy chain two mac pros so that I'm using one monitor and keyboard

    Can I use two mac pro's with one monitor, keyboard & mouse? The two different machines have two different operating systems (Snow Leopard / Lion). One machine is brand new and the other is 5 or 6 years old.
    I want to use both machines in tandem so that I can leave something to render while I work on something else.

    KVM is an answer -- maybe.  I use one for two machines to share one of my monitors (a VGA) and my keyboard (the second older machine seems to have sleep problems if I share a usb mouse on the kvm however).
    The trickiest part of choosing a kvm is trying to find one that can handle the video; one that can handle the required bandwidth, and the connections.  If one computer uses, say DVI, and the other mini-displayport, then you need to figure out which kvm can handle that with one (or both) of the machines using adapter(s). 
    You said one of the machines is brand new.  Then it probably has thunderbolt.  So you would need a mini-displayport, dvi, or vga adapter depending on the monitor.  That means the older machine will need a similar connection since whatever kvm you get will have the same kind of ports for both inputs and its output.
    A wild card here (at least in my mind) is if the newer machine has thunderbolt.  While a mini-displayport display can be plugged into a TB connection, it is not clear that such a thing will work through a kvm.  That is unknown territory I think at this point.

  • Can you daisy chain time capsule??

    A while back I tried to daisy chain 2 lacie drives off of airport and that didn't work. 2 questions:
    1/from what I have read I can connect this to an airport extreme and that will work just like my lacie does now...
    2/Does anyone know if I would be able to use all 3??
    Thank you

    I'll my 2cents worth here as there's some assumptions being made in these responses that IMO are misleading the author of this thread.
    1. Apple fully supports using Time Machine with the internal HDD located in the Time Capsule.
    2. It's a stretch to assume Time Machine can also safely (and with Apple's full support) also support USB AirDisk(s) attached to the Time Capsule. Recall that the earlier version of Time Capsule was the AEBS (10/100 or GbE) supported AirDisk(s) but their use with Time Machine was pulled from Leopard just a week before Leopard was released on Oct 26, 2007. At this time Apple has not made public what their future position is or will be in bringing back this feature.
    So for those that are thinking of using USB drive(s) with Time Capsule and hoping to use them with Time Machine I say be forewarned or at least wait for Apple to publically announce support for them before investing in the Time Capsule.

  • Can you Daisy Chain the WRT54GS?

    Hello,
    I've recently purchased three LInksys WRT54GS. I've read the FAQ but not seen my exact problem listed.
    Can the WRT54GS (the super G version) be Daisy Chained (1 router, 2 as APs with dhcp disabled) and if so which port should link to from router #1, port1 or the "internet" port.
    If I use the port marked "internet" than I get great signal strength but a lot of drops. However if I use port1 on each of the routers I'm using as AP's then I get low signal strength but less drops.
    Configuration so far:
    router-1 (dhcp enabled)
    ssid - router1
    channel 1
    192.168.1.1 /255.255.255.0
    router - 2 (dhcp disabled)
    ssid - router2
    channel 6
    192.168.1.2 /255.255.255.0
    router -3 (dhcp disabled)
    ssid - router3
    channel 11
    192.168.1.3 /255.255.255.0
    thank you for the help!

    These answers are incomplete oin their face:
    You described the config as:
    router -3 (dhcp disabled)
    ssid - router3
    channel 11
    192.168.1.3 /255.255.255.0
    which tells nothing about the "WAN and LAN addresses cannot be the same"
    The "Local IP" address cannot be the same as the Internet (WAN) address
    "Internet Setup" or "Netword Setup"?
    It is as if you have never looked at the config screens in this router.
    How is your local PC connected to the second router supposed to get the DHCP address when there is no route to the first router? Then, how can you connect to the second router to configure the route? I set a static IP for my PC and I can connect to the second router, but even after setting a route, which cannot have a 0.0.0.0 gateway, cannot ping the first router.
    Let's tell the whole story here, the complete configuration. It's a simple expectation to have a second router hard-wired to the first router, and the secod router providing "distant" wireless access to the network.
    The whole story folks?

  • Can You Daisy Chain Verizon Actiontec MI424WR Routers???

    I currently have an Actiontec MI424WR router which is a wireless G router.  Since I have some Tivo HD units in the house (they use wireless G)  that I'm looking to upgrade to Tivo Premiere (they use wireless N), I'd like to upgrade my wireless network to wireless N (I would be able to transfer HD shows between Tivo units ALOT faster over a wireless N network as the G network I have now is very slow).  I also will be buying my son an Xbox and the faster network would help with all the online gaming.
    Since Verizon doesn't yet offer a wireless N router, I'm trying to come up with a solution and I think I might have one.
    I'm sort of a newbie with networking but here is what I'm looking to do:
    I'd want to buy a second router that has wireless N capabilities (I'm looking at the Netgear WNDR3700 Rangemax Dual Band Wireless N).  Then I will go into the Verizon Actiontec router and turn off the wireless function.  Next I will connect the new router to my PC and turn on the wireless function, disable the DHCP and assing the new router a different IP address.  Then I will connect the two routers using an ethernet cable from the Actiontec LAN port the the Netgear's LAN port.  Essentially, what I want to do is have the Actiontec router still bring in all the information in from the ONT but have the Netgear router send it out via it's wireless N signal.
    I think in theory this should work but I wanted to pass it by the forum to see what details I'm missing here.  Any assistance would be greatly appreciated, including any details as I quickly glossed over my idea in the paragraph above.

    Your options are to either buy a Wireless N router, DISABLE DHCP on it, and then plug them together (the internal / ethernet side, do NOT use the WAN port on the new router in this scenario.)  That would make you effectively use it as a wireless access point instead of a router.  You do not want to get into daisy chaining routers, it'd doable, but not a complication  you need in your scenario.
    Honestly if I were you I'd just get a wireless N access point.  http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4468240&CatId=372

  • I have a Mac Pro tower with two internal Hard Discs, each one 2TB. I purchased a 3TB Time Capsule. But it does not allow me to back up because it says there is not enough back up space available. Between the two HDs there are 3.3TBs. Can I daisy chain TC?

    I have a Mac Pro tower (OSX version 10.6.3) with two internal Hard Drives, each one 2TB.
    I purchased a 3TB Time Capsule. But cannot back up because it tells me there is not enough space.
    I have more than 3Tbs to store to the new TC.
    Can I daisy chain two TCs to store the 4TBs?
    How can I back up only the internal HD that is already full, without backing up the other one?
    How can I do back up using Time Machine to back up the 3.5Tbs?
    Do I need to purchase another external HD (that is not TC) to be able to back up all of my photos?

    Can I daisy chain two TCs to store the 4TBs?
    No, you cannot link to produce a single large partition.
    But you can have two separate backup jobs.. and use each partition. That is hard on TM but you can easily get a different backup software for it.
    How can I back up only the internal HD that is already full, without backing up the other one?
    In TM you do a different setup and exclude the other drive.
    But it is better to use an alternative software IMHO.
    How can I do back up using Time Machine to back up the 3.5Tbs?
    You would need to use a network drive of more than 4TB .. it would also take forever. This is just wrong way to do it. Although you can buy a NAS that will work with Time Machine and load it with disks 16TB is possible.. if you can get a second mortgage.. the fragile nature of TM on 3rd party devices.. would leave me in cold sweat if anything went wrong.
    TM is excellent at keeping incremental backups of files that keep changing.. as such you should use TM to backup your OS disk and main user directory.. exclude all files and directories that never change. Back them up separately.
    Do I need to purchase another external HD (that is not TC) to be able to back up all of my photos?
    Yes, that is a much better idea. You want to store photos safely and you want to store them in multiple places. If you have multiple TB of photos, dedicate a couple of disks to the backup. ie have at least two copies.. not in backup format.. in straight copy format if possible.. so you can keep one of the disks offsite.
    I would be using your MacPro internal disk access, to place the disk onto sata bus and do the copy disk to disk direct. Or even buy esata card.. or sata to esata converter cable so you can use esata box. That will beat any other transfer speed except thunderbolt for which you would need third mortgage. (The MORT in mortgage is significant).
    The great jurist Sir Edward Coke, who lived from 1552 to 1634, has explained why the term mortgage comes from the Old French words mort, "dead," and gage, "pledge." It seemed to him that it had to do with the doubtfulness of whether or not the mortgagor will pay the debt.

  • Daisy chain two display port monitors (Dell U2913WM) to new Mac mini Thunderbolt?

    Everything I read said that I could hook up a display port monitor to a Thunderbolt port on the mac mini.  I purchased two display port monitors (Dell U2913WM) that can be daisy chained, and hooked them up.  All I get is mirroring.  Does anyone know how to turn off mirroring with this setup?  I did not get the "uncheck mirroring" option in preferences until I hooked up the second via the HDMI port instead of a daisy chain.  The problem with that is, I cannot take advantage of the full resolution through the HDMI.  It seems I have wasted my money on two monitors.
    Looking for advice on:
    1) How to daisy chain these two Dell monitors to the mac mini and turn off mirroring and use an extended desktop, or
    2) How to take advantage of the full resolution through HDMI port?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks!

    So re-reading this thread, I now realize you did exactly what I wanted to do but your issue was having a cloned vs. extended desktop. Oops!
    I believe your "nothing plugged in" issue is the cable. I'm not sure that TB cables are backwards compatible with DP - I think it's only the ports. Do you see multiple monitors in "System Preferences > Displays" if you hook the monitors up like you described in your OP?
    My Dell U2713H arrived today and it works like a charm with the supplied Mini-DP to DP cable. The built-in display on my 13" mid 2009 MBP still works if not in clamshell mode, although I will mostly use mine in my HengeDock. In the OSD of the monitor, you can access "Display Settings > Display Info" and it will show you the DP capability. Mine is only DP 1.1a and I believe to run 2 of these at full resolution you will need the bandwidth in DP 1.2 which includes MST (daisy-chaining). This could be your problem.
    Can you access the same menu in your OSD and report back what your DP compatability is?
    Thanks!
    mgb

  • Daisy chaining two TCs?

    I have an older 500GB TC and a new 500GB one. If I turn off the router part of the old one can I daisy chain it with the new one and have 1 TB of wireless Time Machine backup capability?

    Unfortunately, there is not a "seamless" or "automatic" way to do this.
    But yes, you can use one computer on the two Time Capsules, but you will have to manually tell your computer which device to use. Make sure that each Time Capsule has a different name.
    Let the current backups continue until TC#1 is close to full.
    Then, click System Preferences on the dock and choose Time Machine
    Click Change Disk
    Click TC#2 to highlight it
    Click Use for backups
    The downside here is that TC#2 will see your computer as a "new" device and it will do a complete backup of the computer and then incremental Time Machine backups after that.
    If you want to go back in time on TC#1, you will need to do the same reset mentioned above and select TC#1.
    Be sure to reset to TC#2 after you are done with TC#1.

  • Can't daisy-chain Firewire drives reliably from 1-port Powerbook. Hub??

    I have found that I cannot get a daisy-chained Firewire drive to mount more than 50% of the time. This problem doesn't happen with Tiger with the same drives. I have tried 4 different brands of late-model Firewire drives (Iomega, Smartdisk, Maxtor, and Seagate) with different cables and what happens is that a drive that is directly attached to the 12" Powerbook will mount, but the second chained drive fails to mount a majority of the time. Since I only have one Firewire port, this is preventing me from using more than one drive at a time, and I lost two Firewire drives to corruption today. Three out of four partitions lost contained bootable backups of Leopard and Tiger. Ouch!
    This issue could prevent from using Leopard with my Powerbook, which is supposed to be Leopard-compatible. I can't remake the clones too easily with only being able to attach one drive at a time. I am thinking I will order a Firewire hub and try that, but I am not sure if that would be a solution, and I am wondering why I can always daisy-chain under Tiger, and not under Leopard. Does anyone have experience with Firewire hubs and Firewire operation details? Will I be able to get reliable Firewire with a hub?

    I have exactly the same problem !
    I have found this :
    Using Multiple FireWire Devices at the Same Time
    Power Macintosh computers can transfer perfect digital video (DV) on FireWire when no other devices are using the FireWire bus. If you have problems transferring digital video, make certain that no other FireWire devices are being used at the same time. Turning on a DV camera that is already connected may cause a FireWire hard disk to stop working. If this happens, turn off the camera and verify that the hard disk has recovered. Then unplug the FireWire cable from the camera, turn the camera on, and reconnect the FireWire cable to the camera. Check with the hard disk vendor for a possible firmware update to prevent this problem.
    here:
    http://www.2ndwave.com/firewire.asp
    At the moment I can't upset what I'm doing to test it but I intend to do that as soon as I finish copying transferring...
    I have the following device attached to different firewire ports:
    a firewire video device connecting my G5 Desktop to the TV screen
    a firewire ibot
    I thought I would give u a head start

  • How many firewire drives can I daisy chain on the mac mini

    How many firewire g-drives can I daisy chain on my mac mini

    edalexjr wrote:
    How many firewire g-drives can I daisy chain on my mac mini
    From personal experience, if they are bus powered portable drives,
    the answer is none.  For what ever reason, they are draw a lot of
    power and are probably near the edge of the bus powering specs.
    Then again, these were the fastest of all the portable FW drives that
    I have (Iomega and Seagate being the others), which may have
    something to do with it.
    I had also noticed an issue with them even with USB.  Plugging one
    into the Mini or even a powered USB hub would be fine, but 2 would cause
    both to be inaccessible, unless I used a couple of USB "Y" cables
    that would distribute the power across other ports.
    If they are externally powered, you could string a bunch.

Maybe you are looking for