Cancel or reverse the process ordrer confirmation posted in a closed period

Hi SAP experts,
                          It would be very nice of you if you could solve this issue for me.
                          The issue is -
                           There is a process order created and released for a material on 01.07.2010.Partial confirmation for the order was done on 15.07.2010 but the posting date was entered as 14.06.2010.So the stock for the material got posted on 14.06.2010 which was supposed to be posted on 14.07.2010. Now, if we try to cancel the order confirmation in the current month through CORS , system is giving errors because the posting period is closed .
                           Is there any way to reverse the postings without opening the posting period?
                           How we can open the field for the posting date in the transaction CORS where we can assign new posting date for the cancellation of the order confirmation. Is it possible to enter this new posting date as 01.07.2010 now because the posting period for July is currently open?
Best regards,
RAB

The reason for reversal is that - the goods receipt on the date 14.06.2010 should tally with the goods receipt for the process order created for the month of June 2010 on that particular date as per the daily production report developed for client. In this case, only one process order is created for a material for each month and that is confirmed daily as per the daily production and then confirmed and settled finallly at the end of the month.
Now the requirement is that the excess goods receipt posted in June 2010 for the process order created for July 2010 should be reversed so that the goods receipts for the June's process order on that particular date for that material match properly.
          Actually , to compensate for this wrong posting done  by the user on 14.06.2010, another confirmation for the same order of July 2010 was done for that material with same qty. with correct posting date(14.07.2010) so that the goods receipts for July 2010 for the material for that process order are proper.
         I am sure you must have clearly understood the issue. Is it possible to cancel the the order confirmation done with posting date 14.06.2010 by giving new posting date as 01.07.2010? Whether this will display proper stock for the material in June as well as July? Kindly confirm.
Best regards,
RAB
Best regards,

Similar Messages

  • Ristrict Cancelling Process Order Confirmation (CORS) after FI MM period cl

    Showing current date as posting date after Cancelling Process Order Confirm:
    Issue with FICO and PP :-, after settlement (ko88) and all period end closing, system still allowed doing Cancelling Process Order Confirmation (CORS) and Showing current data as posting data
    For example:
    My order created on 30th September 2010 and order confirmed on the same day ie my posted date (30th September 2010)
    I have done order reversal on 3rd October 2010 and posting date should be 3rd October 2010 but system showing current data as posting data. Can you please guide me why this unusual behavior happening

    Hi Arun
    Is this  congif change will help me
              1)In BS22 first search for TECO.
               2)Double Click on TECO.
               3)New entry.
               4)Now search FI posting.
               5)Select status as Prohibited
    My Requirement : Ristrict Cancelling Process Order Confirmation (CORS) after FI, MM period closed, and Materail Ledger done
    I want to ristrict the (CORS) reversal of Process Order Confirmation after FI MM ML closed
    right now as per standard its giving warning masage as " Posting with carent date YES or NO, if you say YES then system doing CORS on system carent date, i want to restrict it
    Is above steps you refered will help me
    please confirm
    Regards
    MKbinnal

  • In-process inspection...how to stop the process order confirmation?

    Hi...i'm making an in-process inspection and i want to stop the movement to the next phase or the process order confirmation, until the usage decision is made...how can i make this ?

    Dear,
    You can do this with OPK4 setting here slect your plant and process order type go in details here change the setting to
    Results Rec. (QM) = Error message  if no inspection result exist.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Delivery got canceled without reversing the invoice

    Dear All,
    I came across very strange scenario in one of our client.
    In the export process below are the steps involved.
    Sales order u2013 delivery (no PGI) u2013 pro forma invoice (wrt delivery) u2013 PGI u2013 Export invoice (wrt Delivery)
    Some end user has canceled the pro forma invoice and then reversed the PGI and canceled the delivery, without cancelling the Export invoice, and then created new delivery u2013 pro forma invoice u2013 export invoice.
    So, the question is how system has allowed reversing the goods issue and canceling the delivery without cancelling the export invoice.
    Now, in system it is showing delivery as archived and pro forma invoice as cancelled, but still showing Export invoice.
    System is also not allowing canceling the export invoice, as when we tried to cancel the same it throws an error that the delivery (which has been archived) does not exist.
    Kindly note that the item category has been configured as delivery related billing.
    Can this be possible because of any user exit? or any other reason? and what can be done?
    Thanks,
    Ritesh

    hi,
    THis is possible if the enduser with the help of Abaper or if he has the knowledge and authorization to use ABap tables, he can edit the table and delete the relevant data as required.
    This cannot be traced even by abapers.
    Thanks and regards,
    Sudhir

  • ABAP Programming Error when saving the Process Order confirmation in COR6N

    Hello,
    We have an issue related to Process Order confirmation using Tcode COR6N. When we enter all the inputs to confirm( Activity, yield and phase) and click on save it gives ABAP Programming Error (Exception condition "SEQ_NOT_FOUND" raised).
    Any inputs in this regard, would be appreciated.

    Hello
    I can observe that you have implemented the report ZOPSECRE and that an inconsistency was found.
    This repor corrects inconsistent orders which do not have an operation or a sequence, or the two of them.
    The report checks whether there is at least one operation or one sequence and creates both including status objects.
    Therefore, you need to have the default valus for the operation generation defined on OPJG for this order type/plant.
    BR
    Caetano

  • When I Googled MacKeeper, several items warned against downloading it. Too late! In order to reverse the process, I'm told I need to unencrypt anything that was encrypted. How do I unencrypt? Thanks so much.

    When I Googled the word MacKeeper, several items that appeared warned against downloading this item.  Too late!  I've already downloaded it.
    I was told that, before reversing the download, I needed to unencrypt anything that was encrypted.  How do I do this?

    Remove "MacKeeper" as follows. First, back up all data.
    "MacKeeper" has only one useful feature: it deletes itself.
    Note: These instructions apply to the version of the product that I downloaded and tested in early 2012. I can't be sure that they apply to other versions.
    IMPORTANT: "MacKeeper" has what the developer calls an “encryption” feature. In my tests, I didn't try to verify what this feature really does. If you used it to “encrypt” any of your files, “decrypt” them before you uninstall, or (preferably) restore the files from backups made before they were “encrypted.” As the developer is not trustworthy, you should assume that the "decrypted" files are corrupt unless proven otherwise.
    In the Finder, select
    Go ▹ Applications
    from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-A. The "MacKeeper" application is in the folder that opens. Quit it if it's running, then drag it to the Trash. You'll be prompted for your login password. Then a dialog will pop up asking why you want to uninstall it. You don't have to provide that information. Enter anything you like in the text box, then click the Uninstall MacKeeper button. All the functional components of the software will be deleted. Reboot.
    Do not empty the Trash after dragging the MacKeeper application to it. Let the application delete itself.
    Do not try to uninstall by dragging the MacKeeper icon in the Dock or the LaunchPad to the Trash.
    Here are some general suggestions. If you want your computer to be usable, don't install crapware, such as “themes,” "haxies," “add-ons,” “toolbars,” “enhancers," “optimizers,” “accelerators,” "boosters," “extenders,” “cleaners,” "doctors," "tune-ups," “defragmenters,” “firewalls,” "barriers," “guardians,” “defenders,” “protectors,” most “plugins,” commercial "virus scanners,” "disk tools," or "utilities." With very few exceptions, this stuff is useless, or worse than useless.
    The more actively promoted the product, the more likely it is to be garbage. The most extreme example is the “MacKeeper” scam.
    The only software you should install is that which directly enables you to do the things you use a computer for — such as creating, communicating, and playing — and does not modify the way other software works. Never install any third-party software unless you know how to uninstall it.

  • HT201302 iOS: Importing personal photos and videos from iOS devices to your computer, but I want to reverse the process and copy images from my desktop Windows PC to my new iPad Mini.  Is this possible in some more direct way than through copying several

    Instead of copying images (jpgs, etc) from my iPad Mini to my desktop PC, I'd like to do the opposite, that is, copy existing images from my PC files to my Mini without going through a multi-email process which involves resizing the images by experiment.
    I hope someday Adobe Lightroom can add this feature, but I'll settle for some simple transfer, perhaps by cable between my PC and my Mini.
    Jim Mohundro

    You can do it via your computer's iTunes. If you are on iTunes 11 on your computer then you may want to re-enable the left-hand sidebar via View > Show Sidebar (option-command-S on a Mac, control-S on a PC), which might make it easier to navigate and my instructions may make more sense.
    To sync photos, connect and select your iPad on the left-hand side of your computer's iTunes (if you've enabled the sidebar), and on the right-hand side there should be a series of tabs, one of which should be Photos - if you select that tab you can then select which photo folders to sync to the iPad. There is a bit more info on this page. You will need to sync all the photos that you want on the iPad together in one go as only the most recent photo sync remains on the iPad - synced photos can't be deleted directly on the iPad, instead they are deleted by not including them in the next photo sync.
    If you haven't enabled the sidebar, then from your library click 'iPad' at the top right of the screen and you should get a series of buttons along the top of the screen, including one for Photos

  • When I use Thunderbird, the image shrinks to a point that I cannot see it. How do I reverse the process?

    I am using a laptop, The image shrinks and I cannot get it back to a size I can see?

    Thunderbird support is over here. <br />
    [http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/support/] <br />
    or here: <br />
    http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=39

  • What's the process on re-opening an incorrectly closed bug?

    http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4688797
    must be re-opened.
    I'm a little concerned nobody will look at my update, as the bug is already closed.

    As a guess that is the only way to do it.
    As another guess the only way that you can be sure this actually gets fixed is that you yourself are going to have to dig into the source code and find the problem. And then add that to the bug.
    I say this because I suspect that sun quite possibily doesn't have the expertise to know what is correct (a company can only hire so many developers who happen to be fluent in another language) and if they do then they will be working on something else.

  • T-code to reverse the overhead

    Can someone please let me know, how to reverse the overhead on process orders, and is it always mandatory that we have to reverse the overheads when we reverse the process order confirmation?

    In the same Tcode select "Overhead Claculation->reverse" from top menu bar or presee "F7".
    Reward points if helpful.
    Venkat

  • HU error when Reversing the goods issue in STO process

    Hello Gurus,
    I will explain the whole process we follow for STO:
    1. Create sales order ->Based on PR in sales order schedule lines, PO will be created -> outbound delivery -> Pack in HU -> PGI -> based on output type Idoc will be triggered -> this outbound IDOC will create the Inbound IDOC and Inbound delivery -> Here HU will copied from Outbound delivery (Means both in inbound delivery and outbound delivery HU is same)-> then do the Good receipt in Inbound delivery.
    Now when user doing the goods receipt he is getting error MSSA-SATRA exceeded by 1PCE  The reason is someone deleted the item from the sales order.  Hence when user trying to post the GR it is checking for the open sales order item in MSSA table.  Since it has been deleted from the sales order he cant able post GR.
    Now user does not wants to receive this item, hence we wants to reverse the process.
    So we followed the below process:
    1. Unassigned the HU in Inbound delivery and then deleted the Inbound delivery.
    2. Then used VL09 transaction to reverse the goods issue.  But system giving error saying that HU is already assigned to object.
    I cant able to reverse the Goods issue since the HU is same in Inbound delivery and outbound delivery.
    Kindly suggest the reversal process for the above case.  Many thanks for your help in advance.
    Awating for your valuable replies.
    Br,

    Insted of deleting the handling units you should have un assign the handling units from inbound delivery.You have deleted the handling units and the same handling units will not be available in outbound delivery Pack icon.
    Do one thing are you able to enter line item in sales order ?.If yes then create inbound delivery manually and create new handling units for the qty and do GR.
    Currently where is the stock is it transit ?.If yes then above option may work.
    If nothing is possible only an option to write a SAP oss note they will correct your outbound delivery and inbound delivery.

  • Cancellation of UD and re recording the results before stock posting

    Hello Friends,
    I am working with Handling unit functionality.
    Based on the goods receipt done against the production order system generated the inspection lot. I have done the result recording and then I did the usage decision and saved. I have not yet done the stock posting.
    Now the requirement is I want to change my results in result recording. System is not allowing me to change the results as the message is coming Usage decision is done. How can I cancel or reverse the usage decision so that I can do the result recording. Kindly advise?
    Note: I have done the UD but not yet done the stock posting.
    Regards,
    Narendra Bora

    33924 is the original note.
    Use caution with this, it is not supported by SAP and is not recommended to normally use this. 
    Typically, if you need to correct results, it is recommended that existing results be left and the UD made.  Then create a manual inspection lot for the material and enter in the corrected values.  Make the UD on that lot.  Than manually make any necessary inventory moves.
    FF

  • Process Order does Confirmations and GR even after the Process order is CNF

    Not Sure why the Formatting is lost.
    Hi Gurus,                                                                               
    I am a beginner in this area and request your help.                                                                               
    We are implementing a project where the process order Confirmation in SAP ECC 5.0 in SAP PPPI module is done using xMII which call the BAPI_PROCORD_CREATE_TT     RFC.
    The customer wants to (certain times) do a final confirmation without actually completing the order e.g if the Order Qty is 100 then, they want to just manufacture 25 and then do a final confirmation, after which SAP GUI screen does not allow any Process order Confirmations against that process order.
    We are using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TTRFC to do multiple PO Confirmations and GR for particular Process order. Below is a scenario
    Case 1:
    1. Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only 100 is accepted.
    2. 100 Quantities are produced and confirmed using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final confirmation value as 1 , which mean auto confirmation)
    3. Next when the BAPI confirms & GR's against the same order, the Complete qty is not visible in the COR3 status. And is visible only in the COGI transaction.
    That is expected behavior. and i am ok with that.
    Case 2: (The one with the problem)
    1.  Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only the 100 is accepted.
    2.  25 Quantities are produced and confirmed using BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final Confirmation value as X , which mean Final confirmation)
    3. The Confirmation and GR go through and the status of the process order now changed is CNF and the Deliverd qty is 25.
    At this point , if you logon to SAP GUI and try to make a process order confirmation you get an error messages which says the Process Order is already confirmed and no more confirmations or GR can be done against this Process order.
    4. But when you Again Run the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT, it goes ahead and confirms and makes the GR for that Process order.
    The Expected Behavior should have been that this quantity is now in the COGI transaction.
    5. The Process order  allows any number of Further confirmations till the Ordered Qty and Delivered quantity are  same .
    so dear gurus I know i have written a very long doubt but would be very happy to get a response from you. I would ideally not like to enhance or change the BAPI and want to understand if I have missed some setting or parameter that I have to pass in the BAPI for the final confirmation so that once the Status of the Process order is CNF , no more Confirmations are allowed even from the BAPI.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards
    Suraj

    Hi Suraj,
    I am not positive, but I suspectt the problem lies in the BAPI.  It might be how you have the data set in MII, but it sounded like you are doing it correctly. 
    However there are a number of things you can do to troubleshoot your situation.
    First create a few process orders to test with. 
    Record the confirmation numbers and counters for each of the following:
    1) Do a final confirmation (for quantity of 25 instead of the 100) in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using). 
    2) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) in SE37 or BAPI in ERP using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT.
    3) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) from MII using your current transaction. 
    Review the confirmations in ERP to see if there are any differences.
    Review the confirmaitons in MII to see if there are any non visible differences (use a Tracer to retrieve the response segment from an execution of BAPI_PROCORDCONF_GETDETAIL using the recorded confirmation numbers and counters) 
    Case 1) If there are differences in the results, that should tell you how to modify your transaction to include or change the appropriate values in your inputs. 
    Case 2) If there are no differences, then it is most likely that there is something not working properly in the BAPI you are using.  It may not completely replicate the functionality in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using in ERP).  Then open a ticket, because the BAPI is not working as it should.
    Good luck,
    Mike
    Edited by: Michael Appleby on Aug 17, 2009 8:20 PM

  • Problem in reversing the released Process order.

    Hi PP Gurus,
    When I'm trying to reverse the Process order release in change process order COR2 system is not allowing me as the menu option is Gray. When I released processed order Control recipe is generated and due to some problem in PI sheet I discarded in CO60 transaction code. So can anybody please tell me how to handle this situation? I mean is this can be resolved by configuration or enhancement?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Abu Arbab

    Hi Krishna,
    Thanks for reply.
    Now tell me what should be the approach we if we don't want to delete the Process order? Say PI sheet is created and sent to it's destination through Background job and later we found some error in PI sheet so and we've discarded that PI sheet. In case when I don't want to delete or Teco Process order, what will be the process in this case?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Abu Arbab

  • GR cancellation or reversal

    Dear all as i explained in the below link i am unable to find out the solution.
    Vendor Reconcillation Account
    please advice me .
    i have created PO in may 2007 and GR has happened in oct 2007, and Goods issues also happened for some qty ,now we are unable to perform invoice verification as i explained in above link.
    1) can i reverse the GR and Perform it again ( i mean can i cancel or reverse the GR because GI happened for these goods)
    2) can i post the invoice through FI entry (FB60)
    Please advice me.
    regards
    venu

    Hello,
    If you have not invoiced you should be able to reverse the GR.
    If you get some errors, I would recommend that you open a ticket in the OSS.
    Best Regards,
    Arminda Jack

Maybe you are looking for