Capacity consumption issue

Hello friends,
I have the following scenario:
II am using PP-PI model, Recipe for a Material A has fixed duration of 10 hrs for Capacity consumption.
When there is 1 process order created for 3 pc of A, system consumes 10 hrs of capacity. This works fine.
However if there are 3 process orders for matrial A each of 1 PC, system consumes 30 hrs of capacity. But actually it should consume only 10 hours of capacity.
Has anyone handled this using some special capacity formula or any other workaround.
Thanks in advance, Helpful answers will be rewarded.
Ram

Hi,
Please check for the time wheather you have given any inhouse production time which is indpendent of the lot size , normally if we give this time the system will not consider the lot size , it taked constant time per order , please check and let me know so that i can guide you further .
Thanks and Regards,
Mallikharjun.

Similar Messages

Capacity Consumption of Process Orders Query

Hi Forum,
The client has process orders passing from ECC to APO and the busienss user looks at the SNP Capacity planning book view to see the resource capacity load.
This was all working fine when the ECC scheduling type on the process order was either: 5: Forwards in Time, or 6 Backwards in time.
Yesterday there was a change in ECC where they starting using the scheduling type: 3 Only Capacity Requirements.
SInce thsi chnage APO has stopped recognising the capaicty consumption on the resources. The Process order still appears in APO SNP planning books, but not in the capacity book.
Is '3 Only Capacity Requirements' compatible with APO SNP?
When a process order was changed back to '5 Forwards in Time' in ECC COR2, it would instantly pass to APO and the capacity consumption would return.
Is there some SPRO config somewhere?

Sorry for the delay. I have found a user exit in ECC that controls the filtering of operations. An SAP note (367658 ) appears to suggest it is filtering out the operations when the ECC scheduling setting 3 is used.
My initial testing seems to show this user exit fixes my issue.
From the business side, we have a quite complex solution wher APO plans, ECC converts to process orders and another non SAP system does the scehduling and sends it back. Im not sure on the need for the scheduling type 3, as im not the ECC consultant involved, but im pretty sure its related to the number of lines on the resource in this non SAP scheduling tool.
Not ideal, but if the user exit works for me then i will run with it.
S SB

Zero Capacity Consumption

Hi experts,
I am preparing a prototye for my customer. It is an end-to-end (forecast-SNP-PPDS).
What I have done yet:
- Calculated forecast
- run SNP heueristic for multi level planning. --> SNP production order are created
The issue I am currently facing now is: I created a lot of SNP planned orders in production plant but capacity consumption is still zero. Any idea what else I should do?
Thanks
Aban

Hi Handha,
Thanks for reply.
What I did:
- I put big amount of quantities on certain periods to generate capacity overlaod.
- I run heueristic by using SNP view SNP94(1)
- After I started SNP94(2) to check capacity situation.
What I am wondering at is: there is no capacity consumption in an of the resouces which are used for this product in a specific location (production plant for this product).
For your info: PDS has been transfered and capacity are flagged as Multi Mix in ECC system
Thank you for your support
Aban

SNP Capacity view - Wrong Capacity consumption

Dear All,
Our client facing this critical issue..
In our scenario we have SNP and PPDS are using for planning, issue is related SNP Capacity view..
PPDS orders (firmed planned order, process orders) are not reflecting properly in SNP Capacity view , issues are we can put it into two category
Category 1
We are running PPDS planning run for 3 week , at every Wednesday , after the PPDS planning run, if you check in PPDS DS board or Resource utilization report, we can see the resource are consumed say 87%, but when we you check the same in SNP Capacity view you may see only 60% or like, from the detailed analysis it came to know that some of the products are reflecting in SNP Capacity view, this is only with PPDS planned order or process orders , SNP planned orders are consumed properly in SNP Capacity view (this analyzed with respect to deployment view, (PPDS order also reflecting properly in Deployment view) ( Production confirmed)) because of this wrong data user not able to take proper decision from SNP Capacity view.
Category 2
Scenario is same as previous one, here some time later (say for example next day) some of the products are reflecting in SNP Capacity view. This occurring randomly.
Can any one guide me , what would be the reason for this
From our end we done following activities
1)analyzed the master data didn't find any issue
2) Constancy check done for LiveCache and Planning area
Thanks in advance
Sunny

Have you recently applied any support packs?

Capacity Consumption in SNP Capacity Planning Book

Hi,
Can someone let me know how the Capacity Consumption KF(9ACACON) is calculated in the SNP Capacity Planning Book.
No macor is associated with the KF. But when i load the data in specific to a resource it gives me some value in the Capacity Consumption KF.
Is there any option to identify the calculation logic of this KF ?
Regards
BVN

Hi
There is no formula as such, it depends on the master data settings in your resource. In transaction /sapapo/res01 you can display the Capacity but how exactly depends on what type of resource you are using and how the capacity is calculated, basically you can have:
Time-Continuous capacity
PP/DS Bucket Capacity
SNP Bucket Capacity
And they can also have different values!
For the SNP View it should be using the SNP Bucket Capacity, so if you click on this tab in your resource master data it should have a field "Bucket Definition" which can either be from Continuos Capacity or be maintained separately. If you click the button "Bucket Capacity" it should show you the current values you have.
If it is from Cont Capacity then click that tab and see the start, end and break times there.
To add a little confusion, you may also have several variants of capacity, the active variant is on the General Data tab, this is the capacity variant that should show up as standard capacity in your planning book.
There is more to it all than this but hopefully that should help answer your qeustion.
Regards
Ian

Capacity Consumption in SNP planning book

Hello,
Can anyone explain what drives the calculation of capacity consumption KF in the planning book.
Here is the example.
1) I have a Resource whose SNP bucket capacity of 90,000/Hr = 450000/Wk
2) I created a PP/DS PPM for one product from ECC and then converted it to a SNP PPM
3) There was no resource assignment in the SNP PPM. I then manaully assigned the resource (in step 1) to the PPM.
4) The material consumption on the SNP PPM is 37 per HR
5) The variable bucket consumption on the resource within the SNP PPM is 1 per hr.
Now I created a planned order of 4440 for the finished product in the SNP planning book manually (behind the scenes the heuristic run was carried out obviously).
On my capacity view, the values i see are:
Available capacity = 450000/Week (which is clear since its 90,000 * 5 days/week)
Capacity Conusmption = 6845
Resource capacity level in % = 1.521 (which is 6845/450000 * 100).
The only question is how is the Capacity Conusmption value populated by a value of 6845?
Please provide me your input gurus.
Thx,
Vishy
The idea is to create oneresource and assign it to multiple SNP PPMs so that the capacity situation on this resource for various products could be analysed.)

DEAR GURUS,
*There is a question regarding the resoucre consumptions relevant to PDS in SNP,*
****The inputs are:****
****1) Base Qty= 7700 TH****
****2) Set Up =45 MIN****
****Resource consumed by operation activity is 112 207 seconds = 31,17 hours.****
****Unfortunately we didnu2019t understand how this figure is calculated.****
****Can you please help us in this****

ISE 1.2/1.2.1 license consumption issues

Hi all, I know this topic is somewhat done to death but I want to know whether anyone else is experiencing this issue. In summary my ISE deployment (right this minute) has 17 Active sessions with 17 base and 17 plus licenses consumed. My issue with this is that of the 17 active sessions only 8 of these sessions are utilising a plus feature ie the registration status in the authorisation policy. In short at all times the plus license consumption always matches the base license consumption.
I have continually had this issue with all ISE deployments whereby the license consumption does not reflect Cisco documentation and my configurations. Without giving screenshots I can say with certainty that the only plus feature been used is the BYOD onboarding and subsequent registration status in the authz policy. The rest of my policies are straight forward CWA guest and EAP-TLS machine cert authorisations with no profiling information used in the policy. I have gone so far as to turn off profiling and removing BYOD policies with the same results.
The following document clearly states what should and shouldn't consume a license:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/identity-services-engine/datasheet-c78-730772.pdf
Any input would be appreciated.

The bug is listed as fixed, but I don't see which software it is fixed in. I must admit I've seen this problem for months, probably over a year now. It was already the case on 1.1.4 at least. I have some customers using 1300 of 500 advanced licenses.
It would be nice if it functioned exactly as the documentation always said. It would give you a warm feeling that things will keep working when the advanced license expires entirely (I'm sure we'll find out soon).
At one point I was told it was under discussion whether to fix the problem, or to fix the documentation to fit the problem, but last I heard it would be fixed at some point in the future. Every time we get a call regarding new software (1.2.1, 1.3) I make sure I ask them that the trust based licensing continues. We're OK as long as trust based licensing continues, but it's scruffy and hard to explain to customers why it shows 3 times as many advanced users as they already have. And then on occasions you see their eyes light up when they realise they can run 3000 advanced and Cisco will be none the wiser, or alternatively that they could have got away with a 100 user license and you've just cost them a 5000 user license that nobody can tell if they are using or not.

ABC Analysis of Planned Consumption(Issue against Reservation).

Hi Experts,
Is there any standard report is available for ABC Analysis of Planned Consumption(material issued against Reservation)?
thx in advance...

Hi,
I allready tested with Tcodes such as MC.9 (gives details of total & unplanned consump. not for Planned consump.) & MB51(gives details for only one Mov. Type say either 261 or 262 not possible to do ABC ana. for balance of both)
Is there any other std report as ABC analysis of planned consp.
Thx in advance...

I915 power consumption issue after switch to systemd?

After switching to systemd I noticed a massive increase of power consumption on my Thinkpad X220 (i5 Sandy Bridge).
The strange thing is, that after some reboots it randomly seems to catch the i915 power saving mode and the consumption gets from ~24W to ~7W at idle. But only after several reboots.
Adding the good old i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 to the boot parameters doesn't make any differences. But looking at the powertop detail outputs it seems to be a i915 issue.
Using the latest linux kernel from core (3.6.4) and latest intel drivers (2.20.12).

I started to get suspicious because I have only ever had the issue in my office. Last week, when I encrypted my drive, my machine wrote to disk for more than 14 hours solid. I then did all the set up and all the restoring from backup etc. with no issue whatsoever. Lenovo ran the thing for 48 hours straight with no problem. But once in my office...
So I asked the local IT people if they could think of anything other than overheating and explained the issue. They took my laptop yesterday , booted it from a hardware testing CD and ran it for a couple of hours sitting on top of a hot computer in the server room which is definitely hot. (It has a whole bunch of computers, I guess.) No issue. They then ran stress tests for a while in the same place. No problem. Highest recorded temp: 65C.
The head of IT then took my power adapter to a more general IT service to be tested and inspected. They looked at it, they opened the plug to check the fuse, they tested it. No problem. Of course, the guy also explained why he was asking and the other IT person said, "Oh, is that on level 1?" "Yes..." So apparently there was another machine (a Mac), I think, doing just the same thing in an office in my part of the building. Testing showed that the power spikes and when the power spikes, the laptop shut down as a safety measure. Solution: they installed a UPS for that one laptop. They didn't tell anybody else, including the local IT people.
What the local IT people were going to do was to install equipment to monitor the power in my office and see if anything weird was causing my laptop to react. However, that was when this was an extremely-unlikely-but-we-are-getting-desperate-for-theories scenario. Clearly, that theory no longer seems wildly implausible at all. So the current hypothesis is that it is most likely that my machine is also reacting to the spikes in power by shutting itself off. (I'm not sure why it should have just started doing this but who knows what the state of the electricals is and how that might vary?)
I have been told that a surge protector will do no good. (They've given me one anyway but apparently it will not deal with spikes in phase 3 power or something - I didn't understand this bit but the head IT person said he didn't understand it either but the electricals IT person showed him with graphs on the whiteboard. So it must be true.)
The current plan is to try to get the UPS from central IT which was provided for the other laptop since that person's discipline has since moved to another floor of the building so the UPS probably went back to central IT. They are going to ask during a meeting tomorrow about this possibility. Otherwise, they are planning to order a UPS for me on Monday.
I'm somewhat surprised that the abrupt shutdowns haven't screwed my data. I've lost work but not seen fs corruption. I didn't take my laptop today. I'll need it next week but I do not plan to plug it in in my office until I have a UPS.
I'm pretty annoyed, to be honest. I've wasted hours on this and got incredibly stressed about it. The IT people have also wasted a (smaller) amount of time. I hoped to have a new draft of an article I'm working on written by the end of reading week but that didn't happen due to all of this. And they *knew*. It would be different if this was an unknown problem just discovered - of course, one could understand that. But there's a known problem which can cause this type of problem and presumably could well damage equipment without these sorts of safety shutdown features and they don't tell anybody.
And, no, I doubt very much indeed that a damaged personal machine would be considered the institution's liability. (Maybe if it was a student's machine and the student was required to use it or something but even then...)
I can't believe it does much good to their equipment either.
The local IT people did know there was an issue with some burnt out devices but that was about eight years ago and only got mentioned as a outside possibility when other diagnostics turned up no result.
What gets me is that the proposed solution will only solve the issue for me - not for anybody else in my part of the building on level 1.

Capacity planning issue

Dear all
My customer has two actor types: project managers PM and 7 work center managers WCM, with strong antithesis: PM looks at project quality and productivity; WCM looks at his resources capacity planning.
Every PM defines wbs basic start / finish dates with appropriate, large and comfortable time lag. Into this time lag, during the capacity planning, the WCMs can set definitive activity start / finish dates, by their needs (and with user status communicates to PM the happened choice) .
The generic project is composed of more wbs elements and 7 networks: all activities of a generic network are assigned to only one work center. Every lowest wbs element has only one activity.
Every PM plans dates (large and comfortable) and efforts on network activities; schedules via bottom up and copies wbs scheduled dates on basic dates. After, CP sets the top down scenario and save the project. In IMG, network profile, the type of checking during top-down time scheduling is u201CEu201D: exit with error (transaction code OPUU).
Every WCM using transaction code CM01 doesnu2019t see the WBS constrains. So doesnu2019t know the wbs dates range. Moreover the WCMs donu2019t like a dashboard like CM01 because it is not user friendly. They prefer a graphical dashboard.
My personal idea to resolve this issue is use transaction code CM21 or similar with the display of wbs time lag. Is it possible?
Is there anyone who could help me, please? I am also interested in other technical solution.
Thanks in advance.
Salvo50

Venky,
1) Sales order when enter in the system can perform the capacity availability check ?
Not in ECC/R/3. However, in APO this is possible.
2) The delivery dates & confirmation in the sales order is on what basis?
Depends on how you have configured your availability check. There are a number of possibilities. Many companies confirm MTS orders to Total Replenishment Lead time in the Material master. Other companies leave the orders unconfirmed until Planning has created supply elements (production orders).
As far as the delivery date is concerned, it can also start with the confirmed material availability date as calculated by ATP, and then additionally schedule in the warehouse pick-pack-load times, and route transit time (the time it takes to move the shipment from your loading dock to the customer's location.
In 'Assemble to order' (a special version of Make To Order) it is possible to confirm to the scheduling time of the supporting Finished goods production orders combined with the availability of the components of the FG production order.
In R/3, some companies will confirm the MTS sales order to a date that is farther into the future than the actual estimated process time including capacity backlog. Then, they run MRP to create planned orders. Then, they run Capacity leveling. Then, they run BackOrderProcessing (rescheduling) of the sales orders to re-confirm to the planned or production orders that have been capacity leveled. In this way, Sales orders are indirectly confirmed to capacity.
Consult with your local SD and PP ATP experts to discover the options available.
Rgds,
DB49
Edited by: Dogboy49 on Jan 6, 2010 10:37 PM

Iphone 6 idle time battery consumption issues

My new 1 month old iphone 6 seems to have pathetic idle time power consumption. When i got to bed around 11 AM lets say the battery is around 25% by the time i wake up by 5 AM it drops to 2-3% if wifi is turned on. Just to check if its a wifi issue i tried the same thing without wifi turned on and the results show the drop to be from 25% to 8-9%. I have owned a 5 and 4s previously but never faced any such weird issue. Is this a known issue? Funniest part is all through the day the consumption seems to be pretty much okay, but only during nights the drop seems to be pretty high. Let me know if anyone else is seeing the same issue.

check out this thread
Re: data usage and battery drain has skyrocketed with iOS 8.1.2 (maybe earlier)

PIR consumption issue

We have been having intermittent problems with our R/3 implementation (4.7C)for a long time. PIRs get consumed without explanation (i.e. no sales orders coming it to consume the forecast, which is expressed as PIRs). We suspect it might have something to do with our delivery process, but have been unable to pinpoint it, or re-create it for showing SAP, or anyone else. Has anybody out there experienced something similar? We're at the end of our rope!

I am sorry for the very late reply Senthil.
Yes PIR is basically a requirement that is created manually ( t code :MD64) on the manufacturing plant. This enables the manufacturing plant to produce materials to stock ahead of actual customer requiremnts( the sale order).
The advantage of consumption mode is that it prevents dual planning. To better explain if the sale order is created when actual customer order is received it will first consume the PIR requirement as stocks have been produced ahead of time
(made to stock strategy) against the PIR. If the sale order qty is over & above the PIR reqt then only system will plan for additional qty to meet the remaining sale order qty.
For your case
Lets assume unconsumed PIR for last month was 10. This month PIR is 20.
now sale order comes this month for 10. It will consume the PIR of this month & not consume PIR of last month as your backward consumption is only 5 days. Then your earlier month PIR remains unconsumed & will cause excess planning.
Lets assume another sale order comes for 20. System will consume the remaining PIR (of this month) =10 & replan for additional 10 to meet actual Sale order.
So my advise for consumption periods is backward =30, forward = 30 or 60 days if you create PIR monthly. If your PIR is for weekly or daily buckets then consumption periods as per your selection should work well.
Lastly enusure that unconsumed PIR reorganisation run is carried out to avoid excess planning( tocde: MD74)
Hope this helps you. If you have further doubts please send me an email on [email protected]
Thanks,
Shenoy

PIR & capacity Overload Issue

Dear All,
I entered PIR for materiel-A 60,000 qunat. using t code MD61.
After MRP run i view the capacity over load using CM05 .
In CM05 i found capacity overload for my work center .All requirement assign into the first week and overload becomes 999%.In same work center for sub sequent week where capacity is available that capacity not utilized .So how can i flow my requirement to the next week and reduce my capacity over load.

Dear,
This not possible in R/3 as MRP only look for material availability. So it can be possible through APO which will do the finite scheduling and capacity planning.
Best way according to your capacity put the demend in MD61 suppose week 1 -200 wk 2 100 like wise that.
In R/3 you need to do the Capacity leveliing where finite scheduling take place.
If there is any overload you need to level it.
Options
1.You can dispatch the operation to another work center.
2.You can do splitting so that the same operation is carried out by many people
3. You can shift the dates
4. You can do external processing.
5.You can reduce the reqmts qty.
Capacity leveling is only a tool. If you have overload SAP cannot help unless you have the resources to tackle it.
Please refer this link,
[Scheduling and Capacity planning|http://www.sap-img.com/production/why-used-planning-tools-like-apo-or-i2.htm]
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar
Edited by: R Brahmankar on Mar 3, 2009 1:11 PM

Storage capacity display issue

After updating to iOS 7.0.3, I found out that, upon my first sync, I gained about 13GB of storage capacity on my iPhone. I know I don't have as much space as it is telling me I have. Either I lost a lot of information, or I'm not sure what. I can't find anything missing.

No - I have not tried removing all of them, but I think I am leaning in another direction as the capacity bar DID work correctly at one time, also when I had other devices attached. I mean, it simply could be that I removed iPod too quickly from my PC (or wouldn't that be possible). I am nosing around in the attributes of the folders contained in iPod - should any of them be read only? Like the Contacts folder? Should I change the attributes? Would a reset (not a restore) help?

External WS Consumption Issue

Dear,
Im trying to call an external webservice in an ABAP system (ECC 6.0). I created a Client Proxy using the WSDL file of the webservice, and then made a function module to test it. Unfortunately there is an error message.
The error message from testing function module:
"Unexpected element -el=HEAD ns="
No error from SMICM.
The error message from SM21:
"SOAP Runtime: SOAP Runtime exception: 14 occurred in method GET_METHOD of class CL_SOAP_MESSAGE_11 at p osition 1"
"SOAP Runtime: Exception message: Unexpected element -el=HEAD ns="
BUT this webservice works very well in our Java test environment "J2EE Engine Start Page"/"Web Service Navigator".
Do you have any idea about this error? (We think that this error may be due to the limitation of ABAP, because it works in JAVA. E.g. maybe the structures that have been generated on the ABAP side to not have the correct data type, as we got the warning message "The XSD type long does not exactly correspond to the ABAP type INT4", "The XSD type decimal does not exactly correspond to the ABAP type STRING")
Thanks in advance!
Sincerely yours,
Lisu

Hi Pushkar,
the WSDL content is:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <definitions name="CommitmentServiceDefinitions" targetNamespace="http://cec/budg/webservices" xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:s0="java:cec.budg.webservices" xmlns:s1="http://cec/budg/webservices" xmlns:s2="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/">
- <types>
- <xs:schema attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="java:cec.budg.webservices" xmlns:s0="java:cec.budg.webservices" xmlns:s1="http://cec/budg/webservices" xmlns:s2="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
- <xs:complexType name="CommitmentSearchCriteria">
- <xs:sequence>
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="BlockSize" nillable="false" type="xs:int" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="StartIndex" nillable="false" type="xs:int" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="CentralKey" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="LocalKey" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="UserReference" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
- <xs:complexType name="CommitmentResultList">
- <xs:sequence>
<xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0" name="Commitments" nillable="true" type="java:CommitmentHeader" xmlns:java="java:cec.budg.webservices.model" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="CurrentIndex" nillable="false" type="xs:int" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="FullRowCount" nillable="false" type="xs:int" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
- <xs:schema attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="java:cec.budg.webservices.model" xmlns:s0="java:cec.budg.webservices" xmlns:s1="http://cec/budg/webservices" xmlns:s2="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
- <xs:complexType name="CommitmentHeader">
- <xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Value object for CommitmentHeader.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
- <xs:sequence>
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="BudgetManagementTypeCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="CommitmentClassCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="CommitmentTypeCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="ConsumingL1ReasonJustCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="ConsumingL1ReasonRuleCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="CurrencyCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="CurrentTreeCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="Id" nillable="true" type="xs:long" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="LocalObjectForeignId" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="LocalSystemCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="PaymentClassCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="Remarks" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="ResponsibleDgCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="ResponsibleOrganisationId" nillable="true" type="xs:long" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="ResponsibleUnitCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="Title" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="TransactionAreaCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="TransactionTypeCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0" name="Details" nillable="true" type="java:CommitmentDetail" xmlns:java="java:cec.budg.webservices.model" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
- <xs:complexType name="CommitmentDetail">
- <xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Value object for CommitmentDetail.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
- <xs:sequence>
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="AccountReference" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="AppropriationId" nillable="true" type="xs:long" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="CommitmentAppropriationTypeCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="CommitmentHeaderId" nillable="true" type="xs:long" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="CommitmentHeaderLocalObjectForeignId" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="CommitmentPositionLineNo" nillable="true" type="xs:int" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="DeletedFlag" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="ExchangeRate" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="FutureOpenAmount" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="Id" nillable="true" type="xs:long" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="LocalObjectForeignId" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="LocalSystemCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="LockedFlag" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="OpenTreeFlag" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="PolicyAreaCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="PrecommitmentPositionLocalObjectForeignId" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="ExchangeBaseDate" nillable="true" type="xs:dateTime" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="SpecialExchangeBaseDate" nillable="true" type="xs:dateTime" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="SpecialExchangeRate" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="TotalAcceptedCurrencyAmount" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="TotalAcceptedEcuAmount" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="TotalAvailableCurrencyAmount" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="TotalAvailableEcuAmount" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="TotalConsumedCurrencyAmount" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="TotalConsumedEcuAmount" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="TransactionAreaCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="TransactionTypeCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="TreeCode" nillable="true" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="WorkflowAcceptedCurrencyAmount" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="WorkflowAcceptedEcuAmount" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="WorkflowConsumedCurrencyAmount" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="WorkflowConsumedEcuAmount" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="WorkflowPostedCurrencyAmount" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="WorkflowPostedEcuAmount" nillable="true" type="xs:decimal" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
</types>
- <message name="getCommitmentWithDetails">
<part name="criteria" type="s0:CommitmentSearchCriteria" />
</message>
- <message name="getCommitmentWithDetailsResponse">
<part name="return" type="s0:CommitmentResultList" />
</message>
- <portType name="CommitmentServicePort">
- <operation name="getCommitmentWithDetails" parameterOrder="criteria">
<input message="s1:getCommitmentWithDetails" />
<output message="s1:getCommitmentWithDetailsResponse" />
</operation>
</portType>
- <binding name="CommitmentServiceSoapBinding" type="s1:CommitmentServicePort">
<s2:binding style="rpc" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" />
- <operation name="getCommitmentWithDetails">
<s2:operation soapAction="" style="rpc" />
- <input>
<s2:body namespace="http://cec/budg/webservices" parts="criteria" use="literal" />
</input>
- <output>
<s2:body namespace="http://cec/budg/webservices" parts="return" use="literal" />
</output>
</operation>
</binding>
- <service name="CommitmentService">
- <port binding="s1:CommitmentServiceSoapBinding" name="CommitmentServicePort">
<s2:address location="http://158.166.45.177:7001/abacService/GetCommitments" />
</port>
</service>
</definitions>

Capacity consumption issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for