Capital Planning Report - Insert Actual cost of project for Investment

HI All,
We developed Z report for capital planning report. We inserted Over all plan Investment cost and Total value of assets planned. Now client requires to add <b><b>Actual cost of Project. Could you please give me Table name/ Function modules or any other logic .
Regards
Shirisha

Hi,
Thanks for your solutions.
But I m looking for the Profit center in the report (display screen), not in selection screen.
My scenario is like, the cost was posted to WBSE with X profit center/cost center in January, now I changed the profit center to Y for the same WBSE and posted.
Want to see thru which PC I have posted to WBSE and how much. So that I can reversal.
Thanks again.
Krishna.
Edited by: krishna.gujju on Jul 8, 2011 6:56 PM

Similar Messages

PS - Report on Planned v/s actual cost of the project

Hi,
I have a client requirement on the above subject. In Report S_ALR_87013542, Under actual cost the system is taking both the Revenue and Actual cost booked on the project. Is there any other report wherein the system shows only the actual cost booked on the project so that planned V/s Actual can be compared.
Rgds,
Prasad

Hi,
You can also refer the report S_ALR_87013543 - Actual/Plan/Variance Absolute/Variance %. This will give the reports based on cost elements. Morever plan cost Vs actual cost can be obtained from Project Infosystem report (CN41/ CNS41).
In fact the report S_ALR_87013533 is a hiecherachical report for plan & actual cost of project.
If the system is calculating wrongly both revenue & actual cost under actual then you need to check Cost elements asignments & value category details.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Rakesh Pradhan

FM for Actual cost line items for orders.

HI EXPERTS,
I was working on Actual cost line items for orders / Internal orders of an employee.
standard program RKAEP000 is present through TCODE KOB1.
I want some customization of report, so debugged the program and found that its using a FM 'K_LINE_ITEMS_SELECT_AND_LIST' to calculate internal orders.
But the FM has used REUSE_ALV_* and displaying output itself.
the requirement is to customize the output display .
I searched with K_LINE_* and found some other function modules too.
K_LINE_ITEM_CHECK
K_LINE_ITEM_APC_SIGN_GET
K_LINE_ITEM_GET_CONTEXT_MENU
K_LINE_ITEM_GET_TOOLBAR
K_LINE_ITEM_LOGICAL_KEY_GET
K_LINE_ITEM_TECH_SETTINGS_SET
K_LINE_ITEM_VALUE_TYPES_GET
K_LINE_ITEM_VALUE_TYPES_SET
K_LINE_ITEMS_ACT_GRID
K_LINE_ITEMS_SELECT
K_LINE_ITEMS_SELECT_AND_LIST
K_LINE_ITEM_ACT_CALL_WITH_DATA
K_LINE_ITEM_ACT_DATA_GET
K_LINE_ITEM_CM_CALL_WITH_DATA
K_LINE_ITEM_DEV_CALL_WITH_DATA
K_LINE_ITEM_PLN_CALL_WITH_DATA
K_LINE_ITEM_PROCESS_UCOMM_ACT
K_LINE_ITEM_STEERING_GET
Can anybody tell which FM should i use so that result i will get in an internal table?
or suggest any other methods
Thanks in Advance.
Lucky

I also had the same requirement and used function module K_LINE_ITEM_ACT_DATA_GET
this function is calling K_LINE_ITEMS_SELECT_AND_LIST function with I_NO_DISPLAY parameter
and returning the result.
Already they are in same function group,
I wrote this for future requirements of people after 4 years of this thread

Actual cost line items for orders (KOB1)

Hello everyone,
I need to pull a certain field for an order to the
Actual cost line items for orders report (KOB1), but the field is not available when I
go to the change layout. Can someone let me know how I can have this
field listed?
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Daniel Nicula

Hi Christian,
Ok, so I would need some ABAP support for this right? I was hoping to do it myself.
But, the strange thing is that the field that I would like to bring in my layout is available in 2 clients in the same system and not in all the clients. I have one client in which this field is not available.
How can that be possible?
Bye!

Not displaying Actual cost Line Items for Order

Hi Gurus,
Recently we did patching from SPC6 to SPC8. After patching we noticed that could not able to see displaying Actual cost Line Items for Order from work order.
System is not throughing error message when I double cline on line item at Plan/Actual Comparison screen in work order cost tab.
We can able to see the same from KB01 with out any problem. I have attached the details.
Could any one suggest me please. Appreciate your thoughts
Regards,
Srini

Hi Paul,
I have implemented this note and get it sorted out.
Thank you for support.
Regards,
Srini

Transaction KSB1 - Display Actual Cost Line Items for Cost Centers

Hi,
When I run transaction KSB1 - Display Actual Cost Line Items for Cost Centers, all my offsetting accounts (accumulated depreciation accounts) are shown except for the ones for asset classes:
- Buildings
- PC & Small Applications
On the FI side, I can see transactions being posted to their relative accumulated depreciation accounts but I do not see this on the CO side when transaction KSB1 is executed. I have checked the config and the account assignments look correct. Also, the assets created have cost centers assigned to them.
Could you please help!
Thanks,
- Deki

Hi Murali,
I have one depreciation expense account (P/L Account) which is also a cost element.
During depreciation run, the different asset classes are supposed to hit the depreciation account above and their corresponding accumulated depreciation accounts (These are Balance Sheet Accounts and I have separate accounts for each asset class .. ie: Accumulated Depreciation for Furniture and Fixture for asset class Furniture and Fixture).
Now when I run transaction KSB1 - Display Actual Cost Line Items for Cost Centers, all my accumulated depreciation accounts are shown except for the ones for these asset classes:
- Buildings
- PC & Small Applications
Any thoughts on why the above aren't showing?
Thanks! I really appreciate your help!
- Deki

Table where i see actual cost line item for order (KKBC_PKO)

Dear.
Using transaction KKBC_PKO i can see the actual cost line item for order.
In which table I see these data ?
Thanls

Hi,
check COEP (CO actual line items) the objectnumber is OR+the order number.
Best regards, Christian

Table where i see actual cost line item for order (KRMI)

Dear.
I need to know the table of every single document number of a cost element that I see in the actual cost line item for orders using transaction KRMI.
Thanks
Moderator: Please, search SDN

Hi
Refer the field Object No (OBJNR) in COEP.. In your case, the OBJNR would be ORXXXXYYYYYYYYYYY, where OR means Order, XXXX = Contr Area and YYYYYYYY = Int Order No with preceeding zeroes
Qty is also recorded in COEP
BR,Ajay M

Additional Data On Actual Cost Line Item for Orders. Possible?

Is it possible to show on display of Actual Cost Line Item for Orders the cost center for both settled and not yet settled? As for now we can only view the cost centers that are already settled. Please see attached file for a snap picture of the display.
Thank you in advance.

Hi,
How this would be possible? If the document is not yet settled, then cost centre is unknown. Of course, it is stored in settlement rule, but no actual posting was done yet.
Regards,
Eli

Actual cost line items for network

Hello all,
is there a way to display actual cost line items for networks? I have tried the following ways:
- CJI3
- KOB1
When entering only the network number, the error message KB422 is displayed (No line items were selected). When entering the WBS number to which the network is attached the costs are displayed.
Any ideas? Thank you!
Regards
Christian

Christian Philipp wrote:
H
> When entering only the network number, the error message KB422 is displayed (No line items were selected).
There is no actual posting against the network exists.
Christian Philipp wrote:
When entering the WBS number to which the network is attached the costs are displayed.
after running double click the document number and check the account assignment whether it is to WBSE or to Network activity. It will clear your doubt.

Plan cost & Actual cost in KKBC_ORD for CO Prdn Order

Dear Experts,
We are not able to findout the why difference is appearing during T code KKBC_ORD order analyse for Raw materials, please suggest wht may be the wrong thing in the order?
Before this i would like to brief you on the process.
Raw matls are created with "V" as price control. & Finished Goods as "S" control.& we create one BOM. Say example
My finished Goods will be 500555 code & Raw matl code will say 1001010 & 1002020.
My BOM will contain these raw matls with qty of 1kg each.
FG code 500555 of 2kg Bag
Items are 1001010 & 1002020 of 1kg each.
Here my mvng price are 2 & 4Rs for raw mtls 1001010 & 1002020 respectively.
In Material master we define overhead key as 10% to a Finished goods (500555) in Costing view.
1) Now i create a Base planning object T code KKE1 & I update the 10% as overhead cost & raw matls qtys as per BOM.At the end you can see the overall manufacture cost of the FGs in this case you will get for
FG 500555 about 6.6Rs. then save it.here it is done for 1bag only.
2) Create a CO PRDOUCTION ORDER T code KKF1 system will generate one number & save it. Now go to KKF4 add the base planning object name & enter the required qty say 10 bags...
You can see the COGM will now 66Rs for 10 bags as per the planning.
3)Goods issued to Order 261 with refc to BOM & Order number entred qty as 10. Sytem will calculates the qtys of raw mtals based on 10bags & save it.
4)Goods receipt done against CO PRDOUCTION ORDER (Finished goods 500555).
*5)KKBC_ORD i hav updated the CO PRDOUCTION ORDER & choosen cost trend. Here i am seeing a diffc in actual cost column & variance of 26%.but how it is possible*
Regards
TG

I can think of a couple of areas where there may be differences.
First, your CO order is probably not getting any overhead costs. Your base planning object had 10% overhead built into it, but that is only for developing the preliminary cost estimate for the order. The allocation of actual overhead must occur through some other method (i.e. overhead costing sheet, activity allocation, or template allocation).
Second, the actual material costs assigned to the order will be based on the material's inventory valuation at the time they are issued to the order. Since you said the materials are valuated at weighted average cost, it is possible that their inventory valuation changed between the time the base planning object was created and the time they were issued to the order.
thanks,

Actual costs in Projects

Hi All,
Commitment costs are raised by issuing PR's & PO's.
Can you tell me how Actual costs are raised in projects,please mention all cases.
Muzamil

Hi,
Actual costs are posted in prject in /and from a host of sources:
1.Confirmation of activities
2.Goods Receipt against account assigned purchase orders / service orders
3.Goods Issue against project reservations
3.Confirmation of account assigned orders
4.Settlement
5.Transfer posting
Regards
Muraleedharan.R
091 9880028904

KOB1 - Display Actual cost line items for Orders

Hi All
A production order has been settled. When the actual cost line items are displayed for the said production order in KOB1, there are multiple line items related to the production order that gets displayed.
The issue we are facing is, in one of the line item, the accounting document has one credit (Consumption a/c) and two debits (one debit is to inventory a/c and another debit is to price difference a/c). However in the report, in the offsetting GL column only one GL code (price difference gl account a/c) but appears with the entire amount.
Ideally two separate line items needs to be displayed with respective line items. Is this a flaw in SAP.
Can anybody throw some light on this and help me.
Regards
Prasanna

this is may be config issue.
can you explain with accounting entries for said line items and offsetting GL for each line?
regards.
ashok

Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

Hi,
My issue is as follows.
Production process spans across 2 company codes.
Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
I would be grateful for any ideas.
Thanks,
Szymon

Hi Udo / Szymon.
I have a question about this issue.
In the sap help about multiple valuations / group costing:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
Could you clarify about this?
thanks!!
Arturo.
Group Valuation
Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

Variance key for calculating variance between planned price and actual cost

Hello CO Experts,
I am not following standard cost estimate. I am using price control V for FG. Now I did all the process:
1. Process Order creation
2. Process Order confirmation
3. Template Execution
4. Process Order revaluation
5. Process Order - TECO.
Now when I am running KKS2 (Variance), system is giving following error:
Only remaining var. in version 0 - no target costs for 000001000047
It means system is searching target cost in process order. However, since I didn't executed standard cost, system will populate target cost. Hence my requirement is that the system should calculate variance with respect to planned cost.
Also I have assigned variance key to target version 1. In that assignment, I have selected "planned / preliminary cost" in target cost section.
When I am running KKS2 (variance analysis), system is calculating for both versions. Because of this, it is giving error. There is no input parameter, where I can give specific version.
Please help

Hi Deepak,
For Finished Goods materials if you assigned Price control V (Moving Average) it is irrelevant to run the Standard Cost Estimation.
My earlier client we don't have variance because of the Moving Average Price for Finished Goods.
Please check, It is really required Variance?? If it is required check whether variance key is automatically assigned to Process order or not. (Control Tab)
Ravi Polampalli

Capital Planning Report - Insert Actual cost of project for Investment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for