Carstairs Extremely Low Congestion speeds

During the night around 5-9pm the speeds on BT Infinity are extremely low, around 1-3mb. Although upload is not effected. I have two friends who have confirmed this so I do not think I have a faulty line. Although around 11pm-5pm the speeds are perfectly normal at around 60mb.(my IP profile is 62) I can't post any line stats as I am trying to keep my router and modem connected for as long possible to try and get the cabinet to up my speed. The exchange is WSCAT, Carstairs

I've been experiencing the same issues with FTTC broadband in Lanark and have raised them with my provider (who use BT's infrastructure). Apparently the Carstairs exchange is routed through the Lanark exchange.
I'm afraid it has been going on for a while and I have no information on when it will be resolved.
Have a read through http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,134742.0.html if you are interested.
It would be good if you guys could raise a fault with BT too as the more customers complaining the more likely they are to get it soted.

Similar Messages

Extremely low Internet speed.

Hey guys. First i'd like to start off by saying im not extremely PC literate.
So, my internet connection has suddenly dropped making it near enough impossible to watch youtube videos or even play online games. It also takes about 15 seconds to load up a web-page.
Like I said, im not very literate so please no fancy words
Below is a copy of my ADSL information:
ADSL line status
Connection Information
Line state
Connected
Connection time
0 days, 01:18:07
Downstream
675 Kbps
Upstream
1,099 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI
0/38
Type
PPPoA
Modulation
G.992.3 Annex A
Latency type
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up)
0.0 dB / 0.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up)
0.0 dB / 0.0 dB
Output power (Down/Up)
1.2 dBm / 1.6 dBm
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote)
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote)
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote)
0 / 0
FEC Errors (Down/Up)
0 / 0
CRC Errors (Down/Up)
50641 / 33
HEC Errors (Down/Up)
25443 / 0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote)
4613 / 32

you really should try the test socket this shows how
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Extremly low network speed on NAS access

Hi,
I've serial problems with my network. The speed does does not allow to run Time Machine on my NAS (Buffalo LS-WXL).
It takes some times minutes to open display the content of rectory of
Even with my new infrastructure: CAT7 cable, CAT 6a connectorand netgear LS108E Switch (Gigabit), iMac 27 (2010) there is no improvement.
The max. speed is 6-7 MB/s.
If I run a Windows PC with the same infrastructure it works with 35-20 MB/s, which is not really convincing in a Gigabit network, but much better comared to the MAC.
I'am running the NAS with the AFP-protocoll.
Does anyone know what to do?
Thanks in advanced,
best regards
Thomas

That device is unsupported by Apple and unsuitable for use with Time Machine. I know this isn't the answer you want, and I also know that the manufacturer says the device will work with Time Machine, and that it usually seems to work. Except when you try to restore, and find that you can't.
If you want network backup with Time Machine, use as the destination either an Apple Time Capsule or an external hard drive connected to another Mac or to an 802.11ac AirPort base station. Only the 802.11ac base stations support Time Machine, not any older model.
If you're determined to keep using the NAS for backup, your only recourse for any problems that result is to the manufacturer (which will blame Apple.)

Extremely slow download speed on T420

Hi Forum,
I really hope you can help me somehow. My download speed on my T420 is extremely low, 500B/s, and from my ISP i have 5/0.6 Mbit. I've tried different browsers, tried to change anit-virus, tried to turn off anti-virus but nothing seem to help. However, this problem only occours on my T420 not on my other laptop or smartphone, where i can reach full speed. Furthermore, at some sites I can actually maintain the correct speed. Simply dont know what is going on, but its a pain in the..
Im using:
T420
Access connections
Wireless G network (situated 5 meters away)
Best regards
Christian
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Actually found the solution to my problem, see this link: http://nevermind.dk/nevermind/blog.nsf/subject/windows-7-if-your-wireless-connection-is-really-slow-...

Extremely low message throughput with MQ 3.6

We performed some load tests to determine maximum throughput of the Sun JMS framework when used in conditions similar to our application.
The achieved throughput is extremely low: around 10 messages / second while we expected around 100. Could you please verify what may be the reason?
We encountered one particular problem: the time of closing JMS producers increases much during the test. Message throughput decreases proportionally. Time periods of other phases of the JMS API usage remain constant. What can be the reason?
detailed information:
Our configuration used:
server machine:
cpu: Intel Celeron 2.8 Ghz
ram: 1GB
os: CentOS release 4.4 (Final), 2.6.9-42.0.3.EL
application server: Sun Java System Application Server Enterprise Edition 8.1 2005Q2 UR2
java version: 1.5.0_04
we use default imqbroker configuration
client machine:
Intel Celeron 2Ghz
ram: 512MB
os: Fedora Core release 3, 2.6.12-1.1381_FC3
java version: 1.4.02
Test description (find attached test unit sources presenting our way of using JMS API):
Load test is performed by running a number of concurrent test units against the JMS broker. Number of units is constant in time. Additionally, every unit test at the end of its life cycle launches another unit to keep long test time perspective.
Each test unit is self-contained. It contains of a producer and a consumer (MessageListener). It sends messages to itself . Also each message unit sleeps for some time to simulate message processing.
Messages are non-persistent, no durable subscriptions are used. All units are using one shared Queue for whole messaging. Message selectors are utilized to guarantee that messages are delivered to intended receiver.
By this test we wanted to determine a maximum value of message throughput for which all messages are delivered successfully and in some reasonable time (say less than 1 minute).
Some variations of test units are possible, e.g. JMS connections and/or sessions can be open/closed for every sent message or shared among multiple producers. But (contrary to our expectations) we encountered no visible differences in message throughput and message delivery time.
Code of test units:
Sender.java
package pl.ericpol.jmstest;
import javax.jms.Connection;
import javax.jms.JMSException;
import javax.jms.MessageProducer;
import javax.jms.Session;
public class Sender{
     private UnitTest unitTest = null;
     private Connection connection = null;
     private Session session = null;
     private MessageProducer producer = null;
     private String selector = null;
     public Sender(Connection con, Session session, MessageProducer producer, String selector, UnitTest unitTest){
     public void send() {
          try {
               boolean closeSession = false;
               boolean closeProducer = false;
               if(this.session == null){
                    this.session = this.connection.createSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
                    closeSession = true;
               if(this.producer == null){
                    this.producer = this.unitTest.createProducer(this.session);
                    closeProducer = true;
               this.producer.send(this.unitTest.createMessage(this.session, this.selector));
               if(closeProducer){
                    this.producer.close();
                    this.producer = null;
               if(closeSession){
                    this.session.close();
                    this.session = null;
          } catch (JMSException e) {
               e.printStackTrace();
Receiver.java
package pl.ericpol.jmstest;
import javax.jms.Connection;
import javax.jms.ConnectionFactory;
import javax.jms.Destination;
import javax.jms.JMSException;
import javax.jms.Message;
import javax.jms.MessageConsumer;
import javax.jms.MessageListener;
import javax.jms.MessageProducer;
import javax.jms.Session;
import javax.jms.TextMessage;
public class Receiver extends Thread implements MessageListener{
     private Connection connection = null;
     private Session session = null;
     private Destination destination = null;
     private MessageConsumer consumer = null;
     private Connection sendConnection = null;
     private Session sendSession = null;
     private MessageProducer producer = null;
     private String qname = null;
     private String selector = null;
     private int messagesToReceive = -1;
     private int delay = -1;
     private UnitTest unitTest = null;
     private boolean active = true;
     private long[][] localStats = null;
     private Boolean monitor = new Boolean(true);
     public Receiver(ConnectionFactory cf, Connection sendConnection, Session sendSession, MessageProducer producer,
               String code, UnitTest unit){
          try {
               this.connection = cf.createConnection();
               this.session = this.connection.createSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
               this.destination = this.session.createQueue(this.qname);
               this.consumer = this.session.createConsumer(this.destination, UnitTest.KEY + " = '" + code + "'");
               this.consumer.setMessageListener(this);
               this.connection.start();
               this.producer = producer;
               this.sendSession = sendSession;
               this.sendConnection = sendConnection;
          } catch (JMSException e) {
               e.printStackTrace();
          } catch (NumberFormatException e1) {
               e1.printStackTrace();
     public void run() {
          if(this.consumer == null){
          } else {
               this.sleep(0);
               this.close();
               TestManager.getInstance().unitTestFinished();
     public synchronized void onMessage(Message arg0) {
          Message message = arg0;
          if(this.active){
               if(message == null){
               } else {
                    if(message instanceof TextMessage){
                              this.registerDeliveryTime(this.localStats.length - this.messagesToReceive, message);
                              this.sleep(this.delay);
                              synchronized(this.monitor){
                                   if(--this.messagesToReceive == 0){
                                        this.unitTest.messagesReceived();
                                   } else {
                                        if(this.active){
                                             this.send();
                    } else {
          } else {
          if(! this.active){
               this.notify();
     public synchronized void deactivate(){
     public int getMessagesToReceive(){
          return this.messagesToReceive;
     private void send(){
          try {
               boolean closeSession = false;
               boolean closeProducer = false;
               if(this.sendSession == null){
                    this.sendSession = this.sendConnection.createSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
                    closeSession = true;
               if(this.producer == null){
                    this.producer = this.unitTest.createProducer(this.sendSession);
                    closeProducer = true;
               this.producer.send(this.unitTest.createMessage(this.sendSession, this.selector));
               if(closeProducer){
                    this.producer.close();
                    this.producer = null;
               if(closeSession){
                    this.sendSession.close();
                    this.sendSession = null;
          } catch (JMSException e) {
               e.printStackTrace();
     private synchronized void sleep(int delay){
     private void registerDeliveryTime(int index, Message message){
     private synchronized void close(){
          try {
               if(this.producer != null){
                    this.producer.close();
               if(this.sendSession != null){
                    this.sendSession.close();
                    this.sendSession = null;
               if(this.sendConnection != null){
                    this.sendConnection.close();
                    this.sendConnection = null;
               if(this.consumer != null){
                    this.consumer.close();
                    this.consumer = null;
               if(this.session != null){
                    this.session.close();
                    this.session = null;
               if(this.connection != null){
                    this.connection.close();
                    this.connection = null;
          } catch (JMSException e) {
               e.printStackTrace();
TestUnit.java
package pl.ericpol.jmstest;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Iterator;
import javax.jms.Connection;
import javax.jms.DeliveryMode;
import javax.jms.JMSException;
import javax.jms.MessageProducer;
import javax.jms.Session;
import javax.jms.TextMessage;
import com.sun.messaging.ConnectionFactory;
import com.sun.messaging.QueueConnectionFactory;
public class UnitTest extends Thread{
     public static final String KEY = "Type";
     private ConnectionFactory cf = null;
     private Connection sendConnection = null;
     private Session sendSession = null;
     private MessageProducer producer = null;
     private int delay = -1;
     private int messagesPerCall = -1;
     private int loop = -1;
     private int timeOut = -1;
     private int maxLoops = -1;
     private boolean waitingFlag = false;
     private boolean messagesReceived = false;
     public UnitTest(int loop){
          try {
               this.cf = new QueueConnectionFactory();
               this.applyProps(this.cf, Properties.getInstance().getSunProps());
               this.sendConnection = this.cf.createConnection();
               if(sharedProducer){
                    this.sendSession = this.sendConnection.createSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
                    this.producer = this.createProducer(this.sendSession);
               } else if(sharedSession){
                    this.sendSession = this.sendConnection.createSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
               this.sendConnection.start();
          } catch (NumberFormatException e){
               MyLogger.logger.error("number format exception!!");
          } catch (JMSException e) {
               e.printStackTrace();
     public void run(){
          String selector = String.valueOf(Randomizer.getRandInt(Integer.MAX_VALUE));
          Receiver receiver = new Receiver(this.cf, this.sendConnection, this.sendSession, this.producer, selector, this);
          receiver.start();
          long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
          this.send(selector);
          synchronized (this) {
               if(! this.messagesReceived){
                    this.sleep(this.timeOut);
          long finishTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
          receiver.deactivate();
          if(++this.loop < this.maxLoops && TestManager.getInstance().getStatus()){
               UnitTest newTest = new UnitTest(this.loop);
               newTest.start();
          } else {
               TestManager.getInstance().workerFinished();
     public void messagesReceived(){
     private synchronized void sleep(int delay){
     private void applyProps(ConnectionFactory cf, HashMap props){
     private void send(String selector){
          Sender sender = new Sender(this.sendConnection, this.sendSession, this.producer, selector, this);
          sender.send();
     public MessageProducer createProducer(Session session){
          MessageProducer producer = null;
          String qname = (String) Properties.getInstance().getOtherProps().get(Properties.JMS_QUEUE_NAME);
          try {
               producer = session.createProducer(session.createQueue(qname));
               producer.setDeliveryMode(DeliveryMode.NON_PERSISTENT);
          } catch (JMSException e) {
               e.printStackTrace();
          return producer;
     public TextMessage createMessage(Session session, String selector){
          try {
               TextMessage message = session.createTextMessage();
               message.setStringProperty(UnitTest.KEY, selector);
               String messageLenAsString = (String) Properties.getInstance().getOtherProps().get(Properties.JMS_MESSAGE_LENGTH);
               int messageLen = Integer.parseInt(messageLenAsString);
               StringBuffer buf = new StringBuffer();
               buf.append(selector).append("-");
               for(int i = 0; i < messageLen; i++){
                    buf.append("x");
               message.setText(buf.toString());
               return message;
          } catch(NumberFormatException e){
               MyLogger.logger.error("bad message length!!");
          } catch (JMSException e) {
               e.printStackTrace();
          return null;
}

If you go here:
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/get.jsp
and
1.Check Sun Java Enterprise (or the Sun Java Application Platform Suite),
2.Click Get Download and Media
3. Then select Systems for windows (the bar at the top)
I beleive you can get Message Queue 3.6 SP3 from it, by only installing the Message Queue component.
Note: it is a large download (500 Mb for Application Platform), especially for Sun Java Enterprise...
TE

Macbook pro: Extremely slow upload speed

Hi,
I know this question has beed raised many times before me, seemingly from hundreds or thousands of users, but none of the threads I have found has lead to any solution.
My new Macbook Pro (15 inch), using Lion 10.7.3, is simply unable to obtain anything but an extremely slow upload speed, when using Wifi. I am using an Apple Airpor Extreme wifi device. My work PC, my older Macbook Pro (13 inch), all tablets and telephones etc hooks up to the same Wifi device and obtain all the speed they should, but my new Macbook Pro is sloooooooooooowwwww and sometimes cannot even initiated an uload speedtest at i.a. www.speedtest.net.
As mentioned, I am aware that there are plenty of threads on this, but I am not aware of any that provides a solution.
Is there a solution or is my new Macbook nothing but crAplle?
Best regards,
n

My subscription is 10 Mbps downloadand 2 Mbps download. upload
I get that (10/2 Mbps) on all other devices, other than my new Macbook Pro.
On my new Macbook pro I get 10 Mbps download, but only from 0 to 25 Kbps upload.

HT6114 The update is too big to download at once.Repeatedly I failed to download due to the low internet speeds.Any other way to download in patches and group them later.

The Apple Store indicates one update is available for my MacBook Pro OS X Maverick v10.9.2.But,the same is already shown as installed on 26 April thereitself at the bottom of the APP store.But,i remember it was not fully downloaded then and it was cancelled.The update is too big and due to low internet speeds here,we are finding difficult to download.Can it be downloaded in patches.How?
With Regards
S.ChandraShekhar

The only thing you can do is pause the download. There is no way to divide it into pieces.

Extreme slow upload speed in Dallas area

Hello
Something happened to my upload speed last Thursday, it has dropped considerably connecting to most servers making many sites very sluggish. I have the hardest time just attaching a file in Gmail and the gmail chat keeps saying 'unable to connect'. Using FTP for my work is almost impossible. It's takes me 5-10 tries to upload a file that's not even 50KB.
I've called Verizon tech support and went through different diagnostics and then they sent a new router, which still didn't help. Here's what I concluded so far:
It's not the router
It's not the computer since it happens on every machine
It's not the wiring since I can get good speed test connecting to some servers.
It's not the servers that i'm connecting to; everything works when i'm at work or on the phone.
I have 15/5, I've attached some speed test results.
Verizon's own speed test page even timed our during upload, which was stuck under 0.5 when it was about to finish.
Anyone else experiencing this? Verizon say my issue is currently with the engineers, but I have no idea how long that wait to be.
Thank you

Is there any Verizon representative that can escalate my issue?
Basically a tech came last Saturday and wasn't able to figure out what was wrong and left and closed my ticket. Whenever I call back now they're just telling me it's my computer, which is completely FALSE. All my 5-6 computer just doesn't happen to have slow upload speed of the sudden and require modification to RWin buffer as the suggested by the on-site tech. Verizon phone support bluntly told me they can't do anything further and would charge me for coming out again to replicate my issue.
Things the tech have already tried:
-Run Fios Optimizer multiple times on multiple computers.
-Replaced router
-Replaced ONT
-Rebooted PON card
Upload speed still sporadic, works perfect on some speedtests, but it's less than 0.5MB on many servers including Verizon's very own local speedtest. Gmail and any google site request is constantly slow. This site is slow and often times out. FTP to my own site is almost impossible if I want to upload a file that's bigger than 100kb.
I'm extremely frustrated.... There are reports of same exact issues in other thread, one seems to be fixed. Is there any way Verizon can look at that and apply it here?
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/Slow-upload-and-tired-of-techs-closing-tickets/td-p/62221...
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/Slow-upload-speed-on-evenings-for-almost-2-months-now-on-...
Problem was fixed for Headhunter6
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/Unusable-upload-speed-at-night-and-during-weekend/td-p/62...
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/extreme-slow-upload-speed-in-Dallas-area/td-p/619117
Is it because I'm using a community account on this forum so I'm being ignored?
I've tried to sign up using my residential account, but got this yellow error page.

TS3899 Upgrade to ios6 got the following problems in my ipad2 . Very low download speed. Can not open my apple mail in my iPad.

Upgrade to iOS 6 encountered the following problems in my ipad2.
(1) very low download speed
(2) I can not open my apple gmail in my iPad.
(3) I can't download new apps from Internet.

Have tried your suggestion of toggling but unfortunately that has not solved the problem - but many thanks for the suggestion.
Regards
Sailorfrank

The volume of Youtube is extremely low, even maxed out.

I would say that for the past two-three weeks I've been having a problem where my Youtube volume in Firefox is extremely low. In order to hear anything really I have to have my Windows volume at 100%, my speaker volume maxed out, and Youtube volume at its highest.
I Watched the exact same youtube video in chrome and its so LOUD! I had to turn my windows volume to 50% and my speakers way down and it was still louder than Firefox. I searched for similar issues and found one that exactly matched my problem, I even followed the suggested steps to fixing the issue at hand but nothing has worked.
Steps completed so far:
-Fresh install
-Cleared cookies, cache, site preferences and offline data
-re installing flash
-Cleared flash cookies and settings
I dont want to abandon firefox but this issue is extremely annoying and there doesnt seem to be a logical fix available. Any help is appreciated.

Philip,
I want to thank you for your suggestion. There was an issue where the volume for the Firefox application was turned down extremely low resulting in the issue at hand. I have since corrected this thanks to you!
James,
I appreciate you trying to help but I explained in my question that I had the YouTube volume up to 100%.

Audio extremely low

Solving problem for my mom. Toshiba Satellite M45-S169. Windows XP. Audio is extremely low,
barely discernable but it is there. All volume controls have been verified, devices, drivers are (obviously)
enabled. All audio impacted: system sounds, multiple players, etc.
I personally don't know what triggered the problem or how long it
has been going on.
Tried loading Service Pack 3, no help.
Tried loading RealTek AC97 drivers from toshiba site (5.10.0.5820), same problem.
Looking for advice from anyone who may have this experience. I vaguely recall solving
a similar problem on my Sony Vaio.
thanks, jcs
Solved!
Go to Solution.

jcs wrote:
Don't I feel stupid ! I have been troubleshooting this off and on for a couple
days, never suspecting a manual control. This *does* really help to have that dial turned up
thanks for the help. jcs
You're welcome. At least you hadn't taken it in for service.
Have a Happy New Year!

Satellite A100-532: microphone sound volume is extremely low

I just bought Satellite A100-532 and I have a problem with sound input. I can't use microphone to chat with my friend on msn or even to record my voice on to the hard drive because the sound volume is extremely low.
I tried turning up all the volume on the desktop and on the RealTek HD sound manager but did not help. Microphone is working perfectly fine as I can hear myself well on the speakers.
Normally, with my old laptop (M30 series) I could use the Sound Recorder to record music which I play using Winamp or WinMediaPlayer but for this new laptop it does not detect any sound at all..just silence.
Please advise.

Hi
You should check also the volume controls in the "Sound & Audio devices" in control panel.
In the "Volume" tab please go to "Advanced".
Then a "Volume control" should appear.
Check if all controls are set to high level.
Furthermore enter the "options" and "properties" and enable all volume controls.
Change also to "recording" and enable there also all controls.
Additional you should check if the all "recording controls" are set to high.
Use "Advanced" option of mic and play around with the mic boost settings.
I'm sure you will find the best settings for your mic recording

Vocals are extremely low...help!

On iTunes, my audio is okay except the vocals are extremely low (or sometimes even unaudible). But when I listen to the songs on my iPod, the vocals are totally normal. I've tried fooling around with the equalizer, and then completely turning the equalizer off, but it still doesn't work. I've checked all the forums, but no one seems to have this problem. Then I uninstalled iTunes and installed it again, but the problem remains.
Does anyone know how to fix this?!

Are you aware that you can adjust the volume levels from within iMovie by clicking on the icon located in the centre of the screen amongst 10 other icons, it's the one that looks like a ray gun attack!!! (2nd from right icon)
Failing this, what settings are you using in MPEG Streamclip?
I use EXPORT TO QUICKTIME, then select compression 'APPLE DV - PAL' from the dropdown menu, and move the quality bar to 100%.
Click on 'Make movie'.

XBR75X85OC audio volume setting from receiver extremely low

Equipment involved:Sony AV receiver STRDN1040, Sony Bluray player BDPBX510 and DISH Hopper receiver.Equipment currently configured per TV owners manual HD BRAVIA SYNC Basic connection. Volume is extremely low.

Frankly speaking, ThinkPad W510 speakers or/and it's Conexant sound chip/driver is mediocre. It seems that it is a design fault or Lenovo is trying to save that small amount of additional cost for each of the component so that they can earn more. I used an T400 loaner set before, the speaker and the Conexant SmartAudio was as great or better than my Dell Studio 15.
I am not sure what the heck, Lenovo Research & Development department is doing to make W510 sound mediocre. As an end-user and W510 a mobile workstation, I would also expect the speaker/sound chip to be better than T400.
I have contacted the Lenovo Service Center, they said the final version of the driver is under testing and has not been released to their support website. But I think the soft audio volume problem could never be resolved unless Lenovo would release another version of internal speaker, but not possible as a refreshed version of W-series is coming up next year. (eg. W520)
Problem/bug listed out for the latest version of W510 Audio Driver
http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/W-Series-ThinkPad-Laptops/W510-newest-driver-released-in-7-Oct-is-still-...
Best Regards
Peter
Moderator edit by bananaman: Removed section not in compliance with the Community Rules.

Volume output is extremly low on Z3

My xperia z3's volume output is extremly low comparted to my old iphone 4 and also without any bass even when trying the same set of headphones on both of them , and i tried clear audo+ and DSEE HX but they dont help at all with the volume they make it worse and i tired increasing everything in the equalizer inluding the bass and still nothing is there anyway i could fix this or is there something wrong with my phone?

Seems this is a common problem for people, I'm experiencing the same problem with my z3 compact.
The way to fix this is to root your phone and then it's just a matter of editing a text file inside your phone to raise the overall volume level.
I've posted up a message here too about it, just want for someone to pass it onto Sony and hope that it can be fixed, it's not a major thing for them, it would be quite easy for them to fix.

Carstairs Extremely Low Congestion speeds

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for