Cas latency doesnt change

i try to change my cas latency in the 1.8 bios but when i check cpu-z it still says that its at 3.0.  what could be my problem should i flash a new bios?

It depends on which version of "CPU-Z" that you have, as the Older 1.19 Version seems to Read the Memory Modules SPD, so if your Memory Modules SPD Timings say CAS 3.0, Thats what its going to report...As far as Flashing your BIOS, well if your system is Running nice and stable, and giving you what you exspect of it, then I dont think there is anything in BIOS 1.9 that is going to make any difference for you :undecided:But I am Running BIOS 1.8 Also, so what do I know...........Sean REILLY875

Similar Messages

  • Mixing Ram with different CAS latencies in K7n2 Delta-L?

    I have been using 512mb Kingston Value Ram in my computer, pc3200, with CAS latency of 3.0.   I just purchased some Corsair value select 512mb ram pc3200 with CAS latency of 2.5.   I know you are not supposed to mix ram with different speeds (like 400 vs. 333) but does it matter if the CAS latencies are different?  
    I'm running an AMD XP 1800+, K7n2 delta-L, nforce2 motherboard from MSI.  Someone at a computer shop told me they tried mixing Kingston 3.0 CAS with Corsair 2.5 CAS, and said his computer wouldn't even post.  So I'm wondering if this is an isolated problem, or you will always run into this problem if you mix ram with different CAS latencies.
        If anyone has experience with this issue, please share with the board.  Thanks!
    Chris

    The age old question, will the components I bought be compatible ? There are those that have bought identical matching memory that didn't work. In my case, I had an ECS K7S5A that used PC2100 Crucial memory, the sticks neither matched (at one time they did, but one stick died and they sent me the closest thing they had.). Neither of these Crucial sticks was identified by a configurator as being compatible with the K7N2 Delta L that I decided to buy. In the end, not only did both sticks work, but I put them in as single channel mode (ram slots 1 & 2), but later changed the configuration to dual channel mode (ram slots 1 & 3, even 2 & 3). It worked flawlessly in all three configurations. Sorry for the long answer, but in essence, there are no guarantees and your worries will drive you crazy. When memory is mixed, you reduce the likelihood of compatibility, even when you go beyond the recommended products that were specifically identified.
    That guy at the computer shop, did he ever indicate or isolate the true reason why the memory wouldn't work ? Maybe, maybe not. I would think with a disparity in memory, the bios is the key to setting the settings for the worst stick of the bunch. Then again, the products you get might overclock to what the better sticks run at. My assumption is that mixed sticks, the bios retards settings to this in "auto" mode. When you force it manually, it may work or it may fail. One thing you oughta know, each and every stick has the manufacturers id encoded onto them at the very least, just like the firmware on other items indicates a manufacturer code and other data that allows these things to be compatible. So know you face that battle going in with any of them. If the bios programming doesn't allow it to work, from that perspective, there'll be problems.

  • BUG with Memory CAS-Latency with MSI i848P Neo-LS BIOS

    I have a bug with MSI i848P Neo-LS BIOS. I try many MSI i848P with same trouble : the CAS Latency is always set to 2.0 even if the memory is CAS Latency 2.5.
    It doesn't depend on PSU or others things (graphics card,...).
    Try with Pentium 4C 2.6 or 2.8
    But I have just one brand of memory (but many different sticks). Chips reference are VT56DD32M8PC-5 (256 or 512 Mb). This memory are reference as Cas Latency 2.5
    If I set memory timings on SPD or manual : same result !!!
    If I set memory speed on AUTO or 400 MHz : same result  !!!
    If I set other timings, then they are save correctly (ie : RAS# precharge set to 3 or 4).
    I check timings with latest version of Memtest86+ V1.0 : http://www.memtest.org/
    and of course, I get many errors.
    The same memory tested on others mobo, give good results.
    I try Windows XP installation and I get....  blue screens.
    With some memory sticks : I have this message "memory timing too tighly",
    if I press F1 to continue: then I get a memory cas latency of 2.5 with memtest86+ and then no error.
    I try BIOS revision 1.0 (default) and 1.2: same result !!!
    So, as I said before, I think this is a bug with the BIOS. I agree that a BIOS cannot detect correctly all kind of memory, but if you set memory timings manualy, then it must be set as you want ! ?
    Any idea...
    Thanks

    H0 Alex,
    You are correct.I have the same problem with my 875p neo lsr on bios 1.9. TH0S 0S B0OS BUG.but everyone says your psu is not enough or your rams isnt  on the MSI Memory Compatability List.
    why all of rams I try give same result?
    MS0 boards works only with 10 or 20 ram.you don't say customer why you use this rams?
    why in asus boards many os these rams working properly.This rams isnt on the MSI Memory Compatability List.but working.I try many no name rams and results are very good in all of the tests.
    In my opinion MS0 bioses doesnt work good enough.
    You don't drive a car.Car Drives you.

  • CAS Latency 2 Reverts To 2.5

    My RAM is designed for 2.5-3-3-7.  I've already changed it to 2.5-3-3-7, but was recommended by someone else with similar memory that I try changing the 2.5 to 2, for more performance.  When I set it to 2 it boots and runs fine, but CPU-Z and Memtest86 report it as 2.5 still.  The BIOS definitely reports it as 2.
    Why?
    Is it true that the CAS Latency makes little difference on my system?  Why is this?
    Specs:
    Intel Pentium 4 2.8e HTT @ 3.26GHz
    Thermaltake Spark 7+ Xaser Edition A1715 CPU Cooler
    MSI 865PE Neo2-PFISR motherboard (BIOS ver. 3.8)
    2x512MB OCZ PC3700 Gold Edition Revision 3 Dual Channel Enhanced Latency DDR @ 466MHz
    Built-by-ATI Radeon 9800 Pro @ XT 128MB DDR 256-bit @ 415/744 (Catalyst 4.12)
    Arctic Cooling VGA Silencer Revision 3
    Creative SoundBlaster Audigy2 ZS Platinum
    Cyber Acoustics CA-4100 4.1 Surround
    Maxtor 6Y120M0 120GB HDD 7200RPM SATA150 8MB cache
    Sony DDU1612 40x/16x DVD-ROM
    Sony CRX230ED 52x/32x CD-RW
    Enermax Noisetaker EG475P 470W PSU(+3.3V = 34A, +5V = 40A, +12V = 33A)
    Ultra Dragon ATX Mid-Tower Case
    Windows XP Pro SP2

    Sounds like CPU-Z is reading the IC Chip settings and not BIOS settings.

  • DDR 3200 Cas latency Settings

    I have 2x256 platinum corsair 3200 Low Latency twinx memory. I changed the latency settings to 2.2.3.6. and my pc is now running faster. Does anyone Know the optimal settings I should be running them at? Also what is the Burst speed in the bios.( This is listed right ofter the cas latency section in the bios. I have a choice of 8 or 4 what should I choose

    If your system is running faster-you should be happy. Timings vary from system to system depending on bios version and quality of ram. Ideal settings are 2-2-2-5. In reality this is hard to achieve with stability on a Canterwood/Springdale chipsets-especially in the higher peformance modes (ultraturbo). Also ras to cas seems to be far more stable on these chipsets when set to 3(my gut feeling is that PAT is somehow affecting this setting). Memory manufactures like Mushkin recommend that 6 be used instead of 5 for btter stability and less potential data corruption. Finally from what I remember about burst length 4 is more stable than 8 but 8 allows for more speed. I do not think there is a big drop off when using burst 4 as opposed to 8-you would have to use your own testing. Your settings are fine as long as your system is stable. My one question is how sure of you that what the bios is reporting is what your memory is actually running at. This has been a "known" issue with the various MSI bios's. Use and independant reporting tool such as CPUZ to check the validity of your timings. Also as you tighten your timings it is advisable to raise your Vdimm-2.65-2.80 seems to do the trick-especially if overclocking.

  • Cas latency on one 6758

    Hello Excuse for my English but I use a translator and I am French I have a MSI i875p néo (6758 in pcb1) since several me and I tested all the left bios.  Currently I have the bios 2.2 Since I have this CM, I noticed after having tested different barettes from memories (to corsair, ocz, adata....) that it is impossible to modify CASE LATENCY whereas the other parameters report can modified and thus the parameters case latency is always that of the SPD what want hard that if I have of the memory with a case latency of 2, I cannot put it in of 2.5 or 3!  Who can me help itself to solve this problem bus MSI FRANCE never answers the mail!!!  Thank you

    hope this makes sense:
    il est juste quelque chose qui est erronée avec ce conseil, vous changement biseauté les synchronisations très bien, à moins qu'ils fassent quelque chose vraiment bonne et changent le bios pour faire ainsi.
    si vous voulez changer les arrangements, vous serez meilleur outre d'obliger un nouveau conseil plutôt que de d'attendre MSI à fixer le problème, tel qu'un abit maximum 3
    hehe go the translator!

  • Memory settings? Corsair XMS Extreme - Cas Latency: 2-3-2-6 T1

    I've been trying to make sense out of the memory settings in the Bios. I read a bunch of posts but I'm still a little confused...
    Here is my memory:
    2x512Mb DDR400 - Corsair XMS Extreme - Cas Latency: 2-3-2-6 T1
    TWINX1024-3200LLPT
    on MB: K8T NEO-FIS2R
    what should be the settings as well as voltage for this?
    bank interleaving
    burst length
    CAS (CL)
    TRCD
    TRAS
    TRP
    right now I have:
    CAS: 2
    TRCD: 4
    TRP 2
    DDR Volts 2.65
    thanks
    TZ

    I'm running the same memory as you are with a different colored heat spreader, Corsair XMS 3200LL.  My system has worked fine from day one with the standard SPD settings that are 2-3-2-6-1T at the default voltage.  Unfortunately, Corsair is really hit or miss since all the BH5 chips are gone.  Our RAM is built on CH6 chips (assuming v1.2 RAM).  There's a great Athlon 64 Special Report on setting RAM timings for the Athlon 64 on Mushkin's website.  Luckily, I haven't had to change anything, but the article may help you out.

  • Latency type change (Slow speeds)

    Hi there,
    I would like to request to have my Latency Type changed to Fast Path please, I understand the mods are able to help with this - here are my HH4 stats if they're needed?
    Thanks in advance
    1. Product name:
    BT Home Hub
    2. Serial number:
    +068340+NQ31922187
    3. Firmware version:
    Software version 4.7.5.1.83.8.130.1.17 (Type A) Last updated 03/05/14
    4. Board version:
    BT Hub 4A
    5. ADSL uptime:
    0 days, 00:18:20
    6. Bandwidth:
    1163 / 6648
    7. Data sent/received:
    0.3 MB / 0.5 MB
    8. Broadband username:
    [email protected]
    9. BT FON:
    Yes
    10. 2.4 GHz Wireless network/SSID:
    BTHub4-ZFGN
    11. 2.4 GHz Wireless connections:
    Enabled (802.11 b/g/n (Recommended)) 20 MHz, WPS enabled
    12. 2.4 GHz Wireless security:
    WPA and WPA2
    13. 2.4 GHz Wireless channel:
    Automatic / 6
    14. 5 GHz Wireless network/SSID:
    BTHub4-ZFGN
    15. 5 GHz Wireless connections:
    Enabled (802.11 n 40 MHz (Recommended)) 20/40 MHz, WPS enabled
    16. 5 GHz Wireless security:
    WPA2
    17. 5 GHz Wireless channel:
    Automatic / 40
    18. Firewall:
    Default
    19. MAC Address:
    cc:33:bb:1a:67:e4
    20. VPI/VCI:
    0 / 38
    21. Modulation:
    G.992.5 Annex A
    22. Latency type:
    Interleaved
    23. Software variant:
    24. Boot loader:

    can you go to troubleshooting then logs/wan and post the 2 lines of stats which would be very recent  look something like this
    17:36:06, 23 Feb.
    (580656.970000) DSL noise margin: 6.00 dB upstream, 9.70 dB downstream
    17:36:05, 23 Feb.
    (580656.900000) DSL line rate: 352 Kbps upstream, 928 Kbps downstream
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • DRAM Clock Settings and SDram Cas latency

     : 8o Just got my KT3 ULTRA 2 Socket A Motherboard. When I turn on the computer, in the POST test it says:
    DRAM Clock = 266MHz
    SDRAM Cas Latency = 2
    I checked the cmos and the latency is set at 2 , but what about the DRAM Clock? Please help for I am a newbie. Thanks

    If your CPU is Athlon XP 2700+/2800+, the FSB is 166Mhz, the DRAM frequency is HCLK (166Mhz).
    If your CPU is Athlon XP 2600+ and below, FSB = 133Mhz, then HCLK = 133Mhz, HCLK+33 = 166Mhz
    If your CPU is older Athlon or Duron, FSB = 100Mhz, then HCLK = 100Mhz, HCLK+33 = 133Mhz, HCLK+66 = 166Mhz.

  • HT4623 when turn imessage on there is a message saying waiting for activation but it doesnt change anybody knows why?

    when turn imessage on there is a message saying waiting for activation but it doesnt change anybody knows why?

    Hi guys,
    I keep getting "waiting for activation" on my iMessage. I can only send/receive iMessage from my email address, NOT my phone number.
    I have done all kind of fixing suggestions that I can find online, but nothing works so far.
    - Date & time set as automatic (I don't know why this matter, but mine was already set as automatic from the begining)
    - Reset network setting
    - Changing the DNS to 8.8.8.8.
    - Restore to factory setting (from back up & as new iPhone)
    - Turning on/off iMessage & facetime
    - Sign out/in of apple ID
    - Change location from apple ID
    - Hard reset/reboot
    And many others.
    ...me too. I'm in Portugal having the same issue!! Hopefuly Apple will give us a solution, shortly...

  • XML Form Doesnt change

    Dear forumpeople,
    I have a problem with an XML form I made a while ago. I made a simple news scenario and it all worked fine. Now I just want to add a label with some text above the form. Now when I do this and preview its shows fine, but how much i generate and save it doesnt change in my Portal. Anyone has a clue of what im doing wrong? Thanks!
    MVG

    hi hans,,
    u cn refer to this link....its a step by step guide which fixs ur bug.
    /thread/424120 [original link is broken],
    /thread/231181 [original link is broken],
    /thread/49489 [original link is broken]
    regards
    bhargava
    pts r welcome

  • Why DDR3 @ 1333MHz on Core I7 iMac + CAS Latency

    Hello,
    I've just ordered an iMac 27" Core i7 (mid-2010) with 4Go.
    On Intel's i7 page, I read :
    http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=37148&processor=i7-940&spec-codes=SLBCK
    Memory Specifications
    Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type) 24 GB
    Memory Types DDR3-800/1066
    # of Memory Channels 3
    Max Memory Bandwidth 25.6 GB/s
    Physical Address Extensions 36-bit
    ECC Memory Supported No
    On the other hand, Apple says that memory upgrades shall match the followings:
    * PC3-10600
    * Unbuffered
    * No parity
    * 204 pins
    * *1 333 MHz*
    * SDRAM DDR3
    My questions are:
    1° Why shall we use 1333MHz since i7 only supports 1066MHz ?
    2° As regards CAS Latency, if I add 2x2Gb with faster CAS, will they work at their own CAS Latency or at the stock 2X2Gb's ?
    3° If I decide to leave one slot free, I can simply add 1x4Gb. Will this impact the dual channel performance of the stock 2X2Gb or will this perform as before ?
    Thanks a lot for your help !
    Cheers,

    Hi yoms
    Welcome to Apple Support Communities
    {quote:}1° Why shall we use 1333MHz since i7 only supports 1066MHz ?{quote}
    Do yourself a big favor and stick to [Apple's Memory specification,|http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4255] those that have not, have had all sorts of problems ranging from slow performance, Kernel Panic's, failure to boot, damaged slots and fried memory controllers.
    {quote:}2° As regards CAS Latency, if I add 2x2Gb with faster CAS, will they work at their own CAS Latency or at the stock 2X2Gb's ?{quote}
    When [Installing or replacing memory|http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3918] you can have 2 or 4GB modules in opposing banks, but they all must be the same latency and speed.
    {quote:}3° If I decide to leave one slot free, I can simply add 1x4Gb. Will this impact the dual channel performance of the stock 2X2Gb or will this perform as before ?{quote}
    More ram will help, but [Matched RAM on Intel Macs|http://guides.macrumors.com/MatchedRAM_on_IntelMacs] always provides the best performance.
    Two highly recommended third party ram suppliers are [OWC|http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memory/iMac/2010/DDR321.527] and [Crucial|http://www.crucial.com/store/listparts.aspx?model=iMac%203.6GHz%20Inte l%20Core%20i5%20%2827-inch%20-%20DDR3%29%20Mid%202010&pl=Apple&cat=RAM]
    Dennis

  • Latency Type Change Request - Interleaved to Fast ...

    Hey there I would like to request to have my Latency Type changed to Fast Path for better gaming experience 
    here is my HH4 stats:
    Thanks
    Darren
    1. Product name:
    BT Home Hub
    2. Serial number:
    +068343+NQ41704711
    3. Firmware version:
    Software version 4.7.5.1.83.8.173.1.6 (Type A) Last updated Unknown
    4. Board version:
    BT Hub 5A
    5. WAN:
    PPP Connected
    6. Data sent/received:
    1.0 GB / 1.5 GB
    7. Broadband username:
    [email protected]
    8. BT Wi-fi:
    No
    9. 2.4 GHz Wireless network/SSID:
    BTHub5-KP2X
    10. 2.4 GHz Wireless connections:
    Enabled (802.11 b/g/n (up to 150 Mb/s)) 20 MHz, WPS enabled
    11. 2.4 GHz Wireless security:
    WPA2
    12. 2.4 GHz Wireless channel:
    Automatic (Smart Wireless)
    13. 2.4 GHz Wireless network/SSID:
    14. 2.4 GHz Wireless connections:
    Disabled
    15. 2.4 GHz Wireless security:
    None
    16. 2.4 GHz Wireless channel:
    Automatic (Smart Wireless)
    17. 2.4 GHz Wireless network/SSID:
    BTWifi-with-FON
    18. 2.4 GHz Wireless connections:
    Disabled
    19. 2.4 GHz Wireless security:
    None
    20. 2.4 GHz Wireless channel:
    Automatic (Smart Wireless)
    21. 2.4 GHz Wireless network/SSID:
    Auto-BTWiFi
    22. 2.4 GHz Wireless connections:
    Disabled
    23. 2.4 GHz Wireless security:
    None
    24. 2.4 GHz Wireless channel:
    Automatic (Smart Wireless)
    25. 2.4 GHz Wireless network/SSID:
    26. 2.4 GHz Wireless connections:
    Disabled
    27. 2.4 GHz Wireless security:
    None
    28. 2.4 GHz Wireless channel:
    Automatic (Smart Wireless)
    29. 5 GHz Wireless network/SSID:
    BTHub5-KP2X
    30. 5 GHz Wireless connections:
    Enabled (802.11 a/n/ac (up to 1300 Mb/s)) 80 MHz, WPS enabled
    31. 5 GHz Wireless security:
    WPA2
    32. 5 GHz Wireless channel:
    Automatic (Smart Wireless)
    33. 5 GHz Wireless network/SSID:
    34. 5 GHz Wireless connections:
    Disabled
    35. 5 GHz Wireless security:
    None
    36. 5 GHz Wireless channel:
    Automatic (Smart Wireless)
    37. 5 GHz Wireless network/SSID:
    BTWifi-with-FON
    38. 5 GHz Wireless connections:
    Disabled
    39. 5 GHz Wireless security:
    None
    40. 5 GHz Wireless channel:
    Automatic (Smart Wireless)
    41. 5 GHz Wireless network/SSID:
    Auto-BTWiFi
    42. 5 GHz Wireless connections:
    Disabled
    43. 5 GHz Wireless security:
    None
    44. 5 GHz Wireless channel:
    Automatic (Smart Wireless)
    45. 5 GHz Wireless network/SSID:
    46. 5 GHz Wireless connections:
    Disabled
    47. 5 GHz Wireless security:
    None
    48. 5 GHz Wireless channel:
    Automatic (Smart Wireless)
    49. Firewall:
    Disabled
    50. MAC Address:
    40:f2:01:16:3a:d2
    51. Software variant:
    52. Boot loader:

    What device does the Homehub5 plug into on the WAN side?
    Some sort of modem?
    If you found this post helpful, please click on the star on the left
    If not, I'll try again

  • Check memory cas latency ?

    I have a 15" i5 MBP from 2010 (MacBookPro6,2) with 4 gb of 1066 mhz ram at cl 7. I want to upgrade to 8 gb, but the local computer stores here only carry 2x4gb of 1333 mhz ram at cl 9. My calculations show this new memory should be able to run at 1066 mhz with cl 7. I've installed it in my MBP and it's running fine, but is there a way to tell if the MBP is running the new ram at cl 9 or cl 7 ?

    I've never seen these questions asked here before, and I think therefore it's safe to say that very few Mac users ever give a moment's thought to the stats you're asking about. As a general rule, if it works, we use it. If it doesn't, we exchange it for something that does.
    Most if not all Macs will slow faster-than-spec RAM down to the speed of the specified modules. Your machine is undoubtedly running your RAM at 1066MHz. As for cas latency, who knows? Apple's specs say nothing about that, and never have.
    You will usually save a lot of money by buying RAM online rather than from a local store, and you'll usually be able to find the RAM that is specified for your machine.

  • KTV4 DDR266 memory CAS latency compatability - question

    I am planning to upgrade my DDR266 RAM from 512MB to 1GB by adding a 512MB module.
    The current module is CL2, but all available upgrades are CL2.5. Supliers all recommend CL2.5 modules. Will I have a problem if I mix CL2 with CL2.5? I have ask a couple of memory suppliers about the CL compatability, but they will not express an opinion.
    If there is an issue, I was wondering if setting CAS# Latency in BIOS to CL2.5 will help.

    Hello,
    You should never mix memory modules that are different.
    Yes it can work fine but for optimum performance you must match.
    Sometimes both modules will not work together
    PC will BSOD a lot
    Or it will be ok.
    Yes setting the memory timing to CL=2.5 in the BIOS will make the other memory module run at CL=2.5 but there are more timings that just the CAS latency.
    All must be the same/old module must be capable of running at new modules timings.
    Will the new module be DDR266?
    I would recommend you get some new sticks, PC3200 (<will run at 266DDR) 2x512MB and sell the old one.

Maybe you are looking for