CAS with WSUS(SUP)upstream server connected with microsoft for updates and 3 downstream servers Primary with WSUS(sup)

hi aaa
WSUS in the same site server with sccm but we have one cas and three primary with WSUS
how much traffic will generate due to this process , as our CAS with WSUS will be in the same box and it will provide updates to downstream Servers in three primary sites. IS it good to have WSUS and site server together as we have SQL in different box for
all three primary and CAS.

Hi Torsen
35000 clients with CAS 16GB memory and 300GB Hard disk same for all primary sites
Germany with 6000 clients ,norway with china with 15000 clients and UK with 10000clients
As the client wanted to Use CAS ,we have created CAS otherwise it could be standalone primary site.
CAS in China with each region having Primary site so we have three primary.

Similar Messages

HT4559 I have trouble connecting to iTunes for updates and synchronization

Cannot connect/ contact iTunes with my IPad2. Also cannot sync my iPad2 with laptop's iTunes music and photos. Please offer help. Thanks.

Can't connect to the iTunes Store
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1368
iTunes: Advanced iTunes Store troubleshooting
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3297
 Cheers, Tom

My IPad 2 also will not connect to ITunes for updates and purchased apps. It shows Waiting for several minutes then says it cannot connect to ITunes. All other wifi functions are working fine on it.

I see this is happening to a lot of folks today. Has anyone found a solution?

It is not properly connected to the network.
Make sure location is set correctly
DNS should be on auto (settings - general - network)
Try ethernet
Signal strength on device won't account for issues, you would need a network report from istumbler, netstumbler or similar. This will show accurate signal strength along with noise and nearby networks

Found 0 results for Good Morning, I'm all for updates and maintaining, but I'm upset that Googletooolbar is no longer compatible with Mozilla 5 because I had a great amount of sites saved on Google Bookmark and now it is lost. Any suggestions?

Good Morning, I'm all for updates and maintaining, but I'm upset that Googletoolbar is no longer compatible with Mozilla 5 because I had a great amount of sites saved on Google Bookmark and now it is lost. Any suggestions?

Hi userwhat,
Your personal data should have been saved, and you can try to follow these steps to fix your problem.
*First, you should report that to the developer of the add-on the troubles that you are experiencing.
* Then, you can try [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/ The Add-on Compatibility Reporter], which allows you to use add-ons that haven't yet been explicitly updated to work with Firefox 5, and lets you report the results of compatibility.
* For add-ons that do not work with The Add-on Compatibility Reporter, you can still downgrade to the previously maintained version, which is Firefox 3.6 that you can download here: [http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html]

Good Morning, I'm all for updates and maintaining, but I'm upset that Googletooolbar is no longer compatible with Mozilla 5 because I had a great amount of sites saved on Google Bookmark and now it is lost. Any suggestions?

Good Morning, I'm all for updates and maintaining, but I'm upset that Googletoolbar is no longer compatible with Mozilla 5 because I had a great amount of sites saved on Google Bookmark and now it is lost. Any suggestions?

Hi userwhat,
Your personal data should have been saved, and you can try to follow these steps to fix your problem.
*First, you should report that to the developer of the add-on the troubles that you are experiencing.
* Then, you can try [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/ The Add-on Compatibility Reporter], which allows you to use add-ons that haven't yet been explicitly updated to work with Firefox 5, and lets you report the results of compatibility.
* For add-ons that do not work with The Add-on Compatibility Reporter, you can still downgrade to the previously maintained version, which is Firefox 3.6 that you can download here: [http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html]

Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition 32 bits Service Pack 2 never finishes searching for updates and use 100% of CPU.

Hi everyone, I am having issues updating a clean Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition 32 bits Service Pack 2, so any help with be appreciated cause I've already tried all my cards for the past 5 days in this particular issue without success.
All I did so far is installing Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise with Service Pack 2, open IE to update, it keeps searching for updates and never stop, after 20mn to 30mn the process svchost.exe start using 100% of my CPU.
I already tried the following scenarios:
1- Install IE8, install the update KB927891 and the Windows Update Agent 3.0 (I already had this one installed). Reboot and run windows update trough IE8 and the problem did not solved.
2- Install those 2 software "MicrosoftFixit.wu.MATSKB.Run" and "MicrosoftFixit50777", open IE to update, it still hangs and continues eating my CPU. This is the output of "MicrosoftFixit".
Windows Update error 0x8007000D(2014-01-06-T-06_06_34A) --> Not Fixed
Cryptographic service components are not registered (This service is actually running successfully) --> Not Fixed
3- I found the following script that would register some DLL, deleting the "SoftwareDistribution" and forcing windows update to solve the problem and nothing happened either.
Link to script:
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/Dos-Command-Line-Batch-to-fb07b159#content
Here is a link to the content of my WindowUpdate.log file:
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=883EE9BE85F9632B%21105
Thank you in advance for helping.

All I did so far is installing Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise with Service Pack 2, open IE to update, it keeps searching for updates and never stop, after 20mn to 30mn the process svchost.exe start using 100% of my CPU.
Herein is the root cause of your issue. A topic that's been discussed in several blogs, forums, and even in the media since September regards a known issue with attempting to patch IE6 RTM via Windows Update.
Aside from that particular issue... browsing the Internet with an unpatched instance of IE6, especially from a Windows Server system, is also asking for a world of hurt.
Might I suggest the following:
Download the IE8 for Windows Server 2003 installer to a thumb drive.
Download the latest Cumulative Security Update for IE8 for Windows Server 2003 to a thumb drive.
Reinstall Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 2.
Upgrade to IE8 from the thumb drive installer and apply the
Cumulative Security Update.
Now your machine is capable of safely browsing to Windows Update to install the rest of the updates (well, maybe, there's also all those other Security Updates from the past seven years that your machine still has vulnerabilites for -- even those seven
years of updates are going to take a Very Long Time to scan for, download, and install).
Why don't you have a WSUS server? -- noting, wryly, that you've posted in the *WSUS* forum.
Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCSA, MCITP:EA, MCDBA
SolarWinds Head Geek
Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2014)
My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence%20R%20Garvin-32101
http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

Sessions/connections gets hang during update and select operations.

A table with 3 million records, which has customer details data.
Everyday application is executing select and update queries on that table.
Sessions/connections gets hang during update and select operations.
After checking ADDM report, following are the findings:
Please suggest the solutions
Findings and Recommendations
Finding 1: Row Lock Waits
Impact is 145.22 active sessions, 99.77% of total activity.
SQL statements were found waiting for row lock waits.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is 145.22 active sessions, 99.77% of total activity.
Action
Significant row contention was detected in the TABLE
"AVAYA.AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER" with object ID 82155. Trace the cause of
row contention in the application logic using the given blocked SQL.
Related Object
Database object with ID 82155.
Rationale
The SQL statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv" was blocked on row locks.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 974vg65j29pmv.
UPDATE AVAYA.AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER SET PREFERRED_LANGUAGE = :1
WHERE ( AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER.MSISDN = :2 )
Rationale
The session with ID 50 and serial number 34525 in instance number 1 was
the blocking session responsible for 100% of this recommendation's
benefit.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Application" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is 145.22 active sessions, 99.77% of total activity.
Finding 2: Top SQL Statements
Impact is 46.39 active sessions, 31.87% of total activity.
SQL statements consuming significant database time were found. These
statements offer a good opportunity for performance improvement.
Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is 46.39 active sessions, 31.87% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the UPDATE statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv" for
possible performance improvements. You can supplement the information
given here with an ASH report for this SQL_ID.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 974vg65j29pmv.
UPDATE AVAYA.AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER SET PREFERRED_LANGUAGE = :1
WHERE ( AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER.MSISDN = :2 )
Rationale
The SQL spent only 0% of its database time on CPU, I/O and Cluster
waits. Therefore, the SQL Tuning Advisor is not applicable in this case.
Look at performance data for the SQL to find potential improvements.
Rationale
Database time for this SQL was divided as follows: 100% for SQL
execution, 0% for parsing, 0% for PL/SQL execution and 0% for Java
execution.
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv" was executed 212 times and had
an average elapsed time of 2494 seconds.
Rationale
Waiting for event "enq: TX - row lock contention" in wait class
"Application" accounted for 100% of the database time spent in
processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv".

**addm report **
          ADDM Report for Task 'TASK_7526'
Analysis Period
AWR snapshot range from 5003 to 5004.
Time period starts at 08-JUL-13 11.00.27 AM
Time period ends at 08-JUL-13 12.00.45 PM
Analysis Target
Database 'AVAYADB' with DB ID 2878789264.
Database version 11.2.0.1.0.
ADDM performed an analysis of instance avayadb, numbered 1 and hosted at
NG-LA04AVAYA01.
Activity During the Analysis Period
Total database time was 563062 seconds.
The average number of active sessions was 155.63.
Summary of Findings
   Description         Active Sessions      Recommendations
                       Percent of Activity
1 Row Lock Waits      155.44 | 99.88       1
2 Top SQL Statements 26.67 | 17.14        1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          Findings and Recommendations
Finding 1: Row Lock Waits
Impact is 155.4 active sessions, 99.88% of total activity.
SQL statements were found waiting for row lock waits.
   Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
   Estimated benefit is 155.44 active sessions, 99.88% of total activity.
   Action
      Significant row contention was detected in the TABLE
      "AVAYA.AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER" with object ID 82155. Trace the cause of
      row contention in the application logic using the given blocked SQL.
      Related Object
         Database object with ID 82155.
   Rationale
      The SQL statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv" was blocked on row locks.
      Related Object
         SQL statement with SQL_ID 974vg65j29pmv.
         UPDATE AVAYA.AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER SET PREFERRED_LANGUAGE = :1
         WHERE ( AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER.MSISDN = :2 )
   Rationale
      The session with ID 167 and serial number 6084 in instance number 1 was
      the blocking session responsible for 100% of this recommendation's
      benefit.
   Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
      Wait class "Application" was consuming significant database time.
      Impact is 155.45 active sessions, 99.88% of total activity.
Finding 2: Top SQL Statements
Impact is 26.66 active sessions, 17.14% of total activity.
SQL statements consuming significant database time were found. These
statements offer a good opportunity for performance improvement.
   Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
   Estimated benefit is 26.67 active sessions, 17.14% of total activity.
   Action
      Investigate the UPDATE statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv" for
      possible performance improvements. You can supplement the information
      given here with an ASH report for this SQL_ID.
      Related Object
         SQL statement with SQL_ID 974vg65j29pmv.
         UPDATE AVAYA.AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER SET PREFERRED_LANGUAGE = :1
         WHERE ( AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER.MSISDN = :2 )
   Rationale
      The SQL spent only 0% of its database time on CPU, I/O and Cluster
      waits. Therefore, the SQL Tuning Advisor is not applicable in this case.
      Look at performance data for the SQL to find potential improvements.
   Rationale
      Database time for this SQL was divided as follows: 100% for SQL
      execution, 0% for parsing, 0% for PL/SQL execution and 0% for Java
      execution.
   Rationale
      SQL statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv" was executed 707 times and had
      an average elapsed time of 794 seconds.
   Rationale
      Waiting for event "enq: TX - row lock contention" in wait class
      "Application" accounted for 100% of the database time spent in
      processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          Additional Information
Miscellaneous Information
Wait class "Commit" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Concurrency" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Configuration" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Network" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "User I/O" was not consuming significant database time.
Session connect and disconnect calls were not consuming significant database
time.
Hard parsing of SQL statements was not consuming significant database time.

Ipod Worked by voice control in my Ford Sync, then I connected to Itunes to update and voice control no longer works!

My Ipod worked by voice control when it was connected to my Ford Sync. I connected to Itunes to update and transfer music and voice control no longer works. Help?

Its is a 5th Generation Ipod Classic with video NOT a NANO!

ITunes inmediatly shuts down whenever I connect my IPOD for updating

Whenever I open iTunes and connect my IPOD for updating get the windows message saying "iTunes has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience... bla bla bla , send or dont send error report".
Earlier today, i reinstall iTunes and then update it to the latest version available on line but the "error" continues.
What shall I do????
Please HELP me!!!!!

First uninstall iTunes AND quicktime in control panel>add remove. Goto acer web site and download any patches and updates they offer, especailly for iTunes issues for your model.
Now disable any antivirus programs and security programs and things then goto apple.com and download/install the latest version of iTunes, don't install what came with your iPod on CD for its likly outdated by now anyways. When its done installing, reboot the PC

ITUNES shuts down whenever I connect my IPOD for updating...

Whenever I open iTunes and connect my IPOD for updating get the windows message saying "iTunes has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience... bla bla bla , send or dont send error report". Both Ipod and itunes work well but ipod can't be updated.
Earlier today, i reinstall iTunes and then updated it to the latest version available on line but the "error" continues.
What shall I do????
Please HELP me!!!!!

First uninstall iTunes AND quicktime in control panel>add remove. Goto acer web site and download any patches and updates they offer, especailly for iTunes issues for your model.
Now disable any antivirus programs and security programs and things then goto apple.com and download/install the latest version of iTunes, don't install what came with your iPod on CD for its likly outdated by now anyways. When its done installing, reboot the PC

BB Torch- Email server connection lost since unlocking phone and constant buffering

Since unlocking my BB 9800 I can not received emails (cannot connect to the server). I have WiFi and can connect to the internet but not the server for emails. Prior to unlocking I had no issues. Also, is there a cure for the constant buffering? This is the second handset with the same issue. My provider is Vodafone and I am in medium term based in the US so having emails on my mobile (via Wifi) as my roaming is off is essential. Please help as Vodafone could not.

Vodafone have said it was a firmware or hardware issue... so Im i the piggy in the middle without emails as my roaming is switched off. Again, the only change was entering the code given to me from Vodafone and no more server connection. can you get a second opinion please!

Is there a way to BULK COLLECT with FOR UPDATE and not lock ALL the rows?

Currently, we fetch a cursor on a few million rows using BULK COLLECT.
In a FORALL loop, we update the rows.
What is happening now, is that we run this procedure at the same time, and there is another session running a MERGE statement on the same table, and a DEADLOCK is created between them.
I'd like to add to the cursor the FOR UPDATE clause, but from what i've read,
it seems that this will cause ALL the rows in the cursor to become locked.
This is a problem, as the other session is running MERGE statements on the table every few seconds, and I don't want it to fail with ORA-0054 (resource busy).
What I would like to know is if there is a way, that only the rows in the
current bulk will be locked, and all the other rows will be free for updates.
To reproduce this problem:
1. Create test table:
create table TEST_TAB
ID1 VARCHAR2(20),
ID2 VARCHAR2(30),
LAST_MODIFIED DATE
2. Add rows to test table:
insert into TEST_TAB (ID1, ID2, LAST_MODIFIED)
values ('416208000770698', '336015000385349', to_date('15-11-2009 07:14:56', 'dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss'));
insert into TEST_TAB (ID1, ID2, LAST_MODIFIED)
values ('208104922058401', '336015000385349', to_date('15-11-2009 07:11:15', 'dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss'));
insert into TEST_TAB (ID1, ID2, LAST_MODIFIED)
values ('208104000385349', '336015000385349', to_date('15-11-2009 07:15:13', 'dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss'));
3. Create test procedure:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE TEST_PROC IS
TYPE id1_typ is table of TEST_TAB.ID1%TYPE;
TYPE id2_typ is table of TEST_TAB.ID2%TYPE;
id1_arr id1_typ;
id2_arr id2_typ;
CURSOR My_Crs IS
SELECT ID1, ID2
FROM TEST_TAB
WHERE ID2 = '336015000385349'
FOR UPDATE;
BEGIN
OPEN My_Crs;
LOOP
FETCH My_Crs bulk collect
INTO id1_arr, id2_arr LIMIT 1;
Forall i in 1 .. id1_arr.COUNT
UPDATE TEST_TAB
SET LAST_MODIFIED = SYSDATE
where ID2 = id2_arr(i)
and ID1 = id1_arr(i);
dbms_lock.sleep(15);
EXIT WHEN My_Crs%NOTFOUND;
END LOOP;
CLOSE My_Crs;
COMMIT;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(-20000,
'Test Update ' || SQLCODE || ' ' || SQLERRM);
END TEST_PROC;
4. Create another procedure to check if table rows are locked:
create or replace procedure check_record_locked(p_id in TEST_TAB.ID1%type) is
cursor c is
select 'dummy'
from TEST_TAB
WHERE ID2 = '336015000385349'
and ID1 = p_id
for update nowait;
e_resource_busy exception;
pragma exception_init(e_resource_busy, -54);
begin
open c;
close c;
dbms_output.put_line('Record ' || to_char(p_id) || ' is not locked.');
rollback;
exception
when e_resource_busy then
dbms_output.put_line('Record ' || to_char(p_id) || ' is locked.');
end check_record_locked;
5. in one session, run the procedure TEST_PROC.
6. While it's running, in another session, run this block:
begin
check_record_locked('208104922058401');
check_record_locked('416208000770698');
check_record_locked('208104000385349');
end;
7. you will see that all records are identified as locked.
Is there a way that only 1 row will be locked, and the other 2 will be unlocked?
Thanks,
Yoni.

I don't have database access on weekends (look at it as a template)
suppose you
create table help_iot
(bucket number,
id1    varchar2(20),
constraint help_iot_pk primary key (bucket,id1)
organization index;not very sure about the create table syntax above.
declare
maximal_bucket number := 10000; -- will update few hundred rows at a time if you must update few million rows
the_sysdate date := sysdate;
begin
truncate table help_iot;
insert into help_iot
select ntile(maximal_bucket) over (order by id1) bucket,id1
    from test_tab
   where id2 = '336015000385349';
for i in 1 .. maximal_bucket
loop
    select id1,id2,last_modified
      from test_tab
     where id2 = '336015000385349'
       and id1 in (select id1
                     from help_iot
                    where bucket = i
       for update of last_modified;
    update test_tab
       set last_modified = the_sysdate
     where id2 = '336015000385349'
       and id1 in (select id1
                     from help_iot
                    where bucket = i
    commit;
    dbms_lock.sleep(15);
end loop;
end;Regards
Etbin
introduced the_sysdate if last_modified must be the same for all updated rows
Edited by: Etbin on 29.11.2009 16:48

Connect To Server Hangs Before Prompting For Name And Password

Hi Everyone.
Connect to Server hangs for 25 seconds before prompting for name and password.
I am trying to access a share on a Windows 2008 R2 domain controller via a Mac running 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard) using SMB.
Example: smb://192.168.101.11/sharename
Once connected, browsing is fine - it's just the connecting that takes a long time.
I have specified port 139 and login name, I have disabled IP6 on the Mac, the Mac and Windows 2008 server are on the same LAN and are wired.
Again, once connected, browsing is fine - it's just the connecting that takes a long time.
Any help would be appreciated.
Damian

Something to add ...
Connecting to a Windows 2008 stand-alone server outside of the domain (e.g., workgroup) does not have the same problem - the name and password prompt shows immediately.

HT4113 My sister just handed me one of her old iphone but when i am trying to use it, it is showing iphone is disabled ,please connect to itunes and when i ma trying to use it in recovery mode it is asking for update and when doing so it is showing error.

Well my sister lives in US and she just handed me her old iphone 3gs. The phone was locked to AT&T .While trying to acees it an error message is popping up that Iphone is disable,Please connect to itunes.Well i downloaded a new version of itunes and while connecting it in recovery mode and tryuing to update it it is giving an error.i asked my sister to unlock the phone so i could use it on any network .she has applied for it and will get the code in one week. What should i do?? Please help.

Restore the device as new with an AT&T SIM card or wait until it is unlocked and restore as new with another carriers SIM.

5230 connection problems on Software update and Ov...

Hi,
I recently bought a 5230 on a talk mobile monthly contract and I'v had a few connection problems. First of all I can't check for updates for my phone or the software on it. I just get an error message which says 'connection error'.
Similarly with Maps it simply won't connect to the internet saying 'something went wrong with the connection, please try again'.
The other internet accessing functions of the phone, like the browser and ovi store etc, work fine. Does anybody have any ideas as to what the problem might be?

I am on Pay & Go with o2 which includes web - same old prob with accessing ovi maps - will not allow connection to the internet - in spite of apparently managing to update the latest software - as o2 suggested. Don't know what to do or where to go next for help. Nokia support - zero - wish to hell I had never bought the phone as it has caused me no end of grief - time for an iPhone methinks!

CAS with WSUS(SUP)upstream server connected with microsoft for updates and 3 downstream servers Primary with WSUS(sup)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for