Case review

I was given an early Christmas gift -- my very first iPod (G5, 30GB). Of course, after reading so much here about the necessity of having a case, I looked around online for something I thought I'd like and that would do the job, and I settled on the Sena iPod Video Dockable 30GB (it's also available in 60GB size) -- in magenta, since it's pretty. It's available in a variety of colors.
One reason I chose this was that I've had a Sena case for my Palm for a few years now, and it looks as good now as it did when it was new; the leather is good quality and ages beautifully. This new iPod case seems to be of the same quality and adds very little to the size of the iPod. It has a pocket in the flip cover, closes with convenient magnetic catches, and has screen protection built in. There's no protection for the click wheel, but I'm not sure that's absolutely essential.
As for usability, the case has a cut-out for the earphone jack, and there's another cutout in the bottom for plugging in the USB cable. The hold button is covered when the flap is closed, but it's easily accessible with the flap open -- this will prevent accidentally turning the button on or off. There is a removable belt clip, which will be handy if you don't want to put the iPod into a pocket.
As for cost, I was lucky in that I pre-ordered the case while it was still priced at $40; it's now $45 and apparently will be going up sometime in the future.
This is just MHO, and I have NAYY with Sena, other than as a satisfied customer. HTH someone.

Thanks for that!
I've only tried the Incase Nano Case. It's got an LCD protector and is quite cushioned. If you're a perfectionist I'd not recommend it though, it's got a (as said in the reviews) tight hold spot (hard to reach) and it's misaligned: the scroll wheel is slightly covered so it's hard to start over a song, turn up/down the volume, etc. So summary:
Pros
Nice look (kinda like a wallet)
Nice material
It's got a nifty spot for credit cards, IDs, money, etc.
It's got a nice LCD protector (plastic so that it won't scratch the iPod)
Cons
Doesn't align well with the scrollwheel
Some people said they can't access the hold button (I don't mind though because I just put it on sleep when I stop using it)
The iPod is kinda loose when in the case (it won't fall out, but almost)
Just another opinion.

Similar Messages

  • ZCover cases (review with pics)

    I received my zCover nano cases today. Initial impression. Not perfect by any means. C+.
    First the basics...
    You get two cases with your order ($24.95). One with an open bottom and one with a lanyard and flip bottom with headphone access. You also get a hard plastic screen cover which slips in behind the silicone case making a nice snug fit.
    http://img147.imageshack.us/my.php?image=everything6tl.jpg
    Screen coverage...
    This is the best part. It's a hard plastic piece with little feet that raises it above the screen ever so slightly. I assume the feet are to prevent rubbing and thus scratching the screen as much. Very durable with a sharp and clear view of the screen. There is no distortion at all.
    http://img147.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenbklan3xf.jpg
    Material...
    This is where the problems start. It's very very rubbery. I know... it's silicone... duh. In certain circumstances your nano might bounce if dropped (a little levity never hurts). I think the material is a little too thick. Although my two cases seem to be slightly different in thickness from one another. Perhaps a quality control issue? One operates much easier than the other (more on that subject later). I chose the black one. It seems to attract lint a bit. Not horribly but there are a few fuzzy white things living on the case that need to brushed off quite regularly. Perhaps other colors would be more friendly in the lint department.
    Operation of nano with case...
    Hold button. Okay, this is the biggest problem. The hold button on top is covered completely. It was impossible to move it on the one case so I had to cut a hole in the top to access it. On the other case it was possible to move but very difficult. I have long nails and struggled every time to move it. I can't imagine anyone without nails being able to move it without cutting a hole in the top.
    Click wheel movement. Same problem. The silicone is not noticeably thinner over the wheel. You have to press much harder than normal to make it function. It does work though. Once again the one case was much easier to work than the other but still slightly harder than a naked nano.
    http://img147.imageshack.us/my.php?image=top5jh.jpg
    http://img147.imageshack.us/my.php?image=bottom7iw.jpg
    Conclusions...
    If you are looking for something that is available now and completely covers every inch of your nano this case does meet those qualifications. This will not be my everyday case. I'd use this case if doing something grubby outside. Hiking, gardening, car repair, etc. It's well protected. It would not slide off many surfaces and has grips on the sides. The lanyard is iffy. It looks like a long shoelace. I'm wondering how long it would take to break off of it's connection to the case. It only has a tiny string attaching it to a rubber loop which is part of the case itself. I would feel the need to reinforce it's connection before freely using it.
    http://img147.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lanyard7ye.jpg

    Thanks for the review. I was ready to order one until I saw this! I guess I'll just have to wait until the iSkin Duo comes out, or the Speck SkinTight.

  • InCase rubber case review

    Just picked up a black InCase from the Apple store today (TN563LL/A).
    I am very pleased with it. I thought that since it was rubber it would be kinda sticky feeling (perhaps I'm comparing it with the silicone ones) and grab lint like no tomorrow. It's not bad on the lint thing - and it's been laying on my fuzzy blanket. It seems to remove any lint with a wipe with a lint-free cloth.
    I'm especially pleased with the fit. It has holes for the headphone jack, the USB connector (won't fit in a dock without being removed), the speaker and mic, camera, and the silence slider, but the volume and on/off/sleep buttons are covered. I prefer the fact it doesn't try to cover the glass at all. It doesn't interfere with use at all, or any of the sensors. I'm much less worried about the glass than the chrome and the backing at this point (from the stress tests we've seen), and this 1mm or so of lift should help if it lands face down so it doesn't hit grit on the ground (though I splatted mine on the garage floor the other day with no damage).
    I'm testing the heat retention right now. I didn't have any problems with music, so I'm running a movie now.
    It will definitely keep it from sliding, and other than being harder to slide in and out it still fits in the side cell phone bag on my purse. Hopefully if I accidentally drop it on the corner it will take some of the shock, too.
    No belt clip, but that's not the way I function.
    My two cents. I'm still waiting for what Vaja has to come out with that's not magnetic, and I'm interested in possibly trying Lajo's Exo L with swivel clip so it acts both as a horizontal and vertical stand, but for now this is just about perfect for me.
    My two cents,
    Aym

    I've noticed the stretching as well. If you do buy this case (and frankly, it's a fine case) then leave the iPhone in. I removed mine frequently for cleaning and the rubber has stretched.
    I was looking at the Speck ToughSkin, but it looks a little too...knobby. I just ordered the iSkin Revo for the iPhone, which looks to have everything I want in a case except for a belt clip. I currently use the Contour iSee for the iPhone and I'd like to see what the Showcase for the iPhone will be like. I like clip-able cases as my phone is on vibrate most of the time and I often miss alerts/calls when it's in my pocket, but I also worry about knocking it off my hip somehow, or walking around with it out for all to see, screaming "Hey I'm a $500 phone, why not steal me?"
    Is it just me or the iPhone causing people to seemingly collect cases? I've gone through three including the Crystal Jacket Set I returned.

  • Bad Case Review

    http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/wa/RSLID?mco=9DF 6080&nplm=TN609LL/A
    The Belkin sport armband. I bought this from the apple online store. It got here. I put my iPhone in it and go for a 3 mile run. I'm able to operate the phone just fine through the plastic covering.
    When my run is over, I reach over to unattach the case from my arm, and my phone is partially hanging out. Turns out the plastic front is GLUED onto the outside of the case. What a hunk of junk. One use and it almost cost me my phone.

    Thanks for the warning

  • Can app developers really delete negative reviews in Blackberry AppWorld?

    I was browsing AppWorld, and concerned when I looked at StickyBoard Notes HD, by Joey Beechey.
    In his description, he writes, "ALL REVIEWS THAT ARE JUST SAYING ITS STUPID TO CHARGE FOR AN UPGRADE WILL BE DELETED."
    This has troubling implications.  If a developer can simply remove any negative reviews they choose to, how can I use the reviews as a basis for whether I'll try out or buy an app?  Can he really remove reviews, or is he just hoping to stop people from posting about that?

    Yes and no. The developer can "request" that a review is removed. This is something that should be checked by the App World team at RIM, but in reality they seem to grant any requests without hesitation.
    There has been much discussion about this, because some developers abuse this. Many users who felt conned by the offline maps crooks posted a negative review, only to find it removed later.
    In some cases reviews are automatically denied by App World. It seems to be fuzzy logic, but competitor names and profanity seem to flag reviews for automatic denial.
    In the interest of full disclosure, of the 150 (almost all positive) reviews for our app, we have requested for 5 to be deleted: one was actually a very good rating but contained bad language. Another was a user who hadn't read the description. The other three were problems related to PlayBook OS, not our app.
    Files & Folders, the unified file & cloud manager for PlayBook and BB10 with SkyDrive, SugarSync, Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, Google Docs. Free 3-day trial! - Jon Webb - Innovatology - Utrecht, Netherlands

  • Reviews for apps.

    Something that annoys me about iTunes is that to be able to leave a review for an app sold on iTunes you must purchase the app first. This means that if you use a trial version of an app and it turns out to be a piece of c**p, like Tune-Up for iTunes, you have to purchase a piece of c**p to leave a review that it is a piece of c**p. There isn't even a way to contact Apple/iTunes to address this issue so here I am in the community. My issues are  2:
    1) Leaving a review for a trial version of an app so others won't waste their money and forcing the develpoers to pay attention to reviews and improve their apps.
    2) Apple/iTunes doesn't have a means to communicate directly trrough a customer service site, only this forum. How could this be changed?

    you can't review a light app unless you purchase a full version.
    That is wrong. You can review a light/free version if you obtain that version; I've done it on several occasions. You do not need to own the full/paid version to review the light version. If you want to review the full version, you do have to buy that version. You can review the version you own, and only that version. Reviews are not linked, so the review of a light version will not appear in the full version, and vice-versa.
    Why would anyone purchase a full version of a lousy app just to write a review that it's a lousy app?
    Because unless you own that version, you have no standing on which to claim it's a lousy app. A "light" or "free" version may be very different, and in many cases reviews I've seen rate a light/free version as lousy solely because of features only available in the paid version.
    Again, you have the feedback page via which you can comment to Apple. There's no further reason to continue this conversation.

  • Case with external battery

    Is there a case with external battery coming for iphone 4?

    Oh, OK, probably I was wrong. They "prioritised the charging – phone first, then external battery – so you would always have the internal battery in the best possible state."
    http://davemeehan.com/technology/iphone-4-external-battery-case-review
    Not so sure yet... Anyone has any comments?

  • Good cases / motherboards?

    ok, so I've decided I'm in the mood to build a new desktop system (combined a whole mess of hardware yesterday, turned it on and it made a funny noise and smelled like burning rubber - not fun) and am going to start with a case and motherboard today.
    I'm looking for some recommendations... review sites for this sort of stuff would be nice... tomshardware doesn't have case reviews...
    I'll be shooting for just below bleeding edge... so feel free to shout out anything you want.

    There are some good case reviews here: www.anandtech.com
    I just bought my new system and went through a lot of sites looking information about good PSU, but the case, i just went to stores to see them, i finally got this one:
    http://www.apextechusa.com/proddetail.a … pe=&id=115
    Im really happy with it, its a pleasure not to get cut with sharp edges and its almost 100% tool-less (the only thing that needs a screwdriver are the PCI slots, but i dont change that frecuently anything there).
    Also it comes with a 400W power supply, though i changed it for a TOPower 420W one.
    I went with an Athlon64 754 socket, because of several pros.
    What type of motherboard are you looking for? do you need lots of SATA, AnyRaid, Firewire, lots of USBs, or just a motherboard with integrated video, a couple of SATAs, Raid and a few USBs?
    I bought a DFI LanParty UT nForce3 250Gb. Its quite a motherboard. And there are others like the MSI K8N Neo Plat. or in the cheap side, there is the DFI K8M800 with integrated video...

  • Can not change sound output. Help Please

    Well, i've been digging all the forums lately in web. my problem is, i can't change my 'system' sound output to my sound card which is Native Instruments Audio8 Dj.
    Let me explain my problem decently. I do the usual procedure, system preferences > sound > n then select the output. but nothing happens. it is always set on internal speakers or headphone or whatever plugged in to the *Built-in Output*. I try switching from audio-midi setup n that doesn't work as well. The system perfectly recognizes the sound card, i can get output from sound card with applications which have their own output settings. But i cant change the system output. I have the latest version of soundflower loaded(this might be causing the problem who knows), i used many soundcards before(or maybe even ex-drivers?) n they used to work until i updated to snow leopard. I also tried trashing the files in macintosh hd > library > preferences > audio >>
    and those files *did not regenerate* after restart(like 10 times), so i had to copy them from my imac.(hehe). i tried resetting pram or nvram.(didn't do any good too)And also i tried trashing soundpref.plist which didn't do me any good neither. Now i need that sound card to give me my system output. I don't need drivers of any other ex-sound cards or whatever. My drivers are up to date. And im pretty sure this ain't an hardware fail.
    So, any ideas? Thx.

    I am having the exact same problem. I have spoken with Apple Care and they are having my case reviewed by "Engineers," apparently. Its very frustrating as I cannot listen to iTunes or any of my video games through my really nice monitor speakers. FYI, I had this problem without installing Sound Flower, since then I have installed it in the hopes that having something different to select it might work but no changes. If I hear any good news from Apple I will be back to let you know. This seems to be a very rare problem as I have only found one other post about this issue.

  • T510: display issues(Bright pixels that wouldn't go away) -support?

    Shortly after purchasing a new T510, I started to have problems with the display (Bright pixels that wouldn’t go away).  I figured it was a BIOS or driver issue.  However as my company purchased about 80 of these machines and I turned out to be the only one with the issue, I called support.
    I also purchased the onsite 24hour support for three years, so I called Lenovo and in a couple days (not 24hours) they came in a replaced the LCD panel, which they assured me was the issue.  Not even an hour or two after the repair tech (David) left the problem started happening again.
    I called back and Lenovo now indicated it has to be the motherboard.  Ok, so a couple days later David came in and replace the motherboard.  Now I purchased these units fully loaded, discrete graphics extra memory, high res, etc.  The motherboard they replaced it with did not have the Nvidia card, instead just the onboard graphics, which A. is no what I purchased, and B. not equivalent or better.
    So David ripped out the new inferior board and put the old broken one back in, so I could at least continue with my job, with the intermittent pixel issue. I should also mention the screen went blurry at the same time the pixel issue happened, so I would have to reboot to restore the monitor.  David then ordered another Motherboard.
    A week went by and no one called me back, so I called Lenovo again to find out what the heck was going on and why I didn’t have a new one ready in waiting within 24 hours. I was informed that is not how the warrantee works, only that they will respond in 24 hours and that the verbiage on their site around the warrantee was not perfectly clear.  Wow. OK…  I then asked when they expect to have this fixed and it turns out the part I need is on back order.
    The part finally arrives. In another 4-5 days, however, I have a business trip coming up and I can’t risk yet another defective part. With my current flaky monitor I can at least get by.  So I schedule a time with David the repair tech to swap it out when I return.
    I get the new Motherboard installed and I get all these video errors and other things start going horribly wrong.  David indicates it is a driver/bios issue and I need to upgrade/install drivers to remedy it.  Okay, so I do that, spend hours trying to get it to work. Turns out this motherboard is even worse and it crashes every time I try and use an external monitor or if the Nvidia 3100 kicks in for hardware acceleration.
    I continue to work under the belief that this is a driver issue and try to fix it, however one of the MANY crashes ends up corrupting my Window 7 install, now throwing blue screens all the time and destroying my development env in the process. So I rebuild the machine and it just keeps happening.  This is now days of lost work that I can’t bill for.
    I call Lenovo again to try and get this lemon replaced.  I get a hold of Jerome who punts me to Lenton, who punts me to Nate Bennet.  Nate seems like a reasonable guy and informs me that at their level of service they can only repair the units and are happy to continue working through this. By now this is gone on long enough and I want to have the laptop replaced, 1 out of 80, this one is a lemon. Nate appears to agree and kick off an escalation process to have this case reviewed and informs me that someone will call me back in 24-48 hours (business days that is).  Okay this is still incredibly inconvenient, but at least I believed we are making forward progress.
    36 Hours goes by and no one calls me back, so I call Lenovo yet again.  I get a hold of Julius.   Julius informs me he’ll have a supervisor call me back right away, as there was not one available.
    48 hours later I call Lenovo again, as you can guess no one has called me back.  I get a hold of Michael.  I again explain the whole situation to Michael and ask to speak to a supervisor, again...  Which again I’m informed is not possible as there is not one available.  Michael indicates that he’ll have a supervisor call me back.  This time I say I can wait on the line because that is what everyone else told me and nothing happened.  Michael then informs me that he is Michael and would not let that happen and assured me that a supervisor would call me back right away. I relent; verify my contact info with Michael and it all seems to be accurate.
    So again nearing the end of the day no one has called me back, I call Lenovo yet again.  This time I get a hold of Phil.  I once again explain the whole situation.  Phil is very apologetic, but still is unable to produce a supervisor.  Phil indicates he’ll put sticky notes on his supervisor’s machine to contact me back. I guess these guys are probably using a T510 as well and can’t read their email either.
    I ask for the name of this supervisor because clearly Lenovo is filling me with horse s&^% at this point.  There is a clear pause and all he says it "Carter.., that is his last name I don’t know his first name." Okay really, so you know this guy well enough to put sticky notes on his monitor, but you only know his last name.  Now I know I’m being lied to, but what can I do.
    So here I am with a busted laptop that crashes at least 3-4 times a day I can’t use the discrete graphics that I paid for and only supports the LCD panel built into it.  In previous experience, with a different manufacturer, after the first few failed attempts they would have replaced the unit.  I guess I should be angry with the guy that convinced us to give Lenovo machines a try for the next refresh (That was me by the way).
    I really have no idea how to proceed with this one.  This is first time in my career that I have ever been treated like this.  I really have no idea what to say.
    Moderator Note: Edited subject to match content.

    technoone wrote:
    " but it seems an awful lot like that subject line was changed to, well, make sure less people would click through and read your post.".
    I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt on this one, there is a message at the top of the forum stating: 
    "Welcome to Lenovo's Discussion Community!  Please note our guidelines when posting."
    if you read the Forum Guidelines it states quite clearly;
    Title threads appropriately
    . The title of a thread should accurately reflect the subject of the discussion and be as technically specific as possible.  Avoid inflammatory or emotional statements that do not aid the development of the conversation. Thread titles are indexed not only for search functions within the forum, but often externally in Google, Yahoo, etc. Proper thread titles will aid the active members of the Lenovo community, as well as non-members who may be searching more broadly. Example of a good thread title: T Thinkpad Blue Screens after suspend . Example of a bad thread title: Stupid computer locks up - worthless piece of junk. Moderators may alter thread titles to be more meaningful if less than appropriate titles are chosen.
    I'm certain the edited title represents the actual real hardware problem at hand better than the original because it's more descriptive and accurate and will therefore attract the attention of the members who have experienced the same or similar situations to comment and offer advice based on their experience.
    Please do take time to read our guidelines as I'm sure you'll find some other helpful and informative tips in them.
    Regards
    Andy  ______________________________________
    Please remember to come back and mark the post that you feel solved your question as the solution, it earns the member + points
    Did you find a post helpfull? You can thank the member by clicking on the star to the left awarding them Kudos Please add your type, model number and OS to your signature, it helps to help you. Forum Search Option T430 2347-G7U W8 x64, Yoga 10 HD+, Tablet 1838-2BG, T61p 6460-67G W7 x64, T43p 2668-G2G XP, T23 2647-9LG XP, plus a few more. FYI Unsolicited Personal Messages will be ignored.
      Deutsche Community     Comunidad en Español    English Community Русскоязычное Сообщество
    PepperonI blog 

  • Get the column values in a single row seperated by commas

    Hi
    i have two tables project_baseline and project_resource which have the foreign key project_id from the base table project_details. Now iam trying to retrieve data from these tables using the below query :
    select distinct b.TASK_NAME,r.RESOURCE_NAME,() from project_baseline b inner join project_resource r on R.PROJECT_ID=B.PROJECT_ID group by b.TASK_NAME,r.RESOURCE_NAME
    Below is the output snippet :
    TASK_NAME RESOURCE_NAME
    TEST DESIGN PARAGI M
    TEST DESIGN RAJAN M S
    TEST EXECUTION VIBHU ARMA
    TEST EXECUTION PRATHAB GARG
    TEST EXECUTION NAGABHUSHAN G K
    TEST DATA PREPARATION RAJAN M S
    TEST DATA PREPARATION SHIVA MARAN
    TEST CASE REWORK VISWAN RAM
    TEST CASE REVIEW NAGABHUSHAN G K
    REGRESSION SANGEET
    PROJECT SUPPORT VIBHU ARMA
    PROJECT SUPPORT PRATHAB GARG
    PROJECT SUPPORT PARAGI M
    PROJECT SUPPORT NAGABHUSHAN G K
    PROJECT SUPPORT SANGEET
    PROJECT CLOSURE PRATHAB GARG
    i need to get the resource_names in a single row seperated by comma for a single task like following:
    TASK_NAME RESOURCE_NAME
    PROJECT SUPPORT VIBHU ARMA,PRATHAB GARG,PARAGI M,NAGABHUSHAN G K,SANGEET
    Could anyone please help me to get the query for the above formated output?
    Thanks in advance
    Meera
    Edited by: 928378 on May 22, 2012 5:20 AM

    Hi,
    It can be done using xmlagg function.
    For Example :
    Table Data..
    DEPTNO     ENAME
    20     WARD Tree
    23     Shank
    30     BLAKE
    10     MILLER
    30     MARTIN
    10     CLARK
    20     SCOTT
    30     TURNER
    20     ADAMS
    30     JAMES
    20     FORD
    30     BLAKE
    Query:
    SELECT deptno,
    RTRIM (XMLAGG (XMLELEMENT (e, ename || ',')).EXTRACT ('//text()'),
    ) NAME
    FROM emp
    GROUP BY deptno;
    Output :
    DEPTNO     NAME
    10     MILLER,CLARK
    20     WARD Tree,FORD,ADAMS,SCOTT
    23     Shank
    30     BLAKE,TURNER,BLAKE,JAMES,MARTIN
    Thanks,
    Shankar
    Thanks,
    Shankar.

  • Newbie trying to query an XML field in Clob

    I've been unsuccessfully trying to query XML data in a CLOB field today without much success.
    The clob field stores approvals (Edited, Reviewed, Published) for each version.
    I'm trying to get the latest version (in this case 13) and what state (name) it is at (in this case 'Reviewed')
    Below is an example of the table and field with a single XML column...
    desc WIKI.OS_PROPERTYENTRY
    Name                                              Null?       Type
    ENTITY_NAME                                         NOT NULL VARCHAR2(125)
    ENTITY_ID                                         NOT NULL NUMBER(19)
    ENTITY_KEY                                         NOT NULL VARCHAR2(200)
    KEY_TYPE                                               NUMBER(10)
    BOOLEAN_VAL                                               NUMBER(1)
    DOUBLE_VAL                                               FLOAT(126)
    STRING_VAL                                               VARCHAR2(255)
    TEXT_VAL                                               CLOB
    LONG_VAL                                               NUMBER(19)
    INT_VAL                                               NUMBER(10)
    DATE_VAL                                               DATE
    SQL> select xmltype(text_val) from wiki.os_propertyentry where entity_id = 7274716 and entity_key = 'com.comalatech.workflow.approvals';
    XMLTYPE(TEXT_VAL)
    <ApprovalChecks>
      <ApprovalCheck>
        <name>Edited</name>
        <version>7</version>
        <approvers>
          <Approver>
         <approved>true</approved>
         <user>bgra030</user>
         <date>2008-10-31 13:47:25.638 NZDT</date>
         <comment>Initial import from Word document without change</comment>
          </Approver>
        </approvers>
        <weight>10</weight>
        <id>1</id>
        <stateId>0</stateId>
        <attachments/>
      </ApprovalCheck>
      <ApprovalCheck>
        <name>Reviewed</name>
        <version>7</version>
        <approvers>
          <Approver>
         <approved>true</approved>
         <user>bgra030</user>
         <date>2008-10-31 13:47:30.532 NZDT</date>
         <comment/>
          </Approver>
        </approvers>
        <weight>20</weight>
        <id>2</id>
        <stateId>0</stateId>
        <attachments/>
      </ApprovalCheck>
      <ApprovalCheck>
        <name>Signoff</name>
        <version>7</version>
        <approvers>
          <Approver>
         <approved>true</approved>
         <user>bgra030</user>
         <date>2008-10-31 13:47:32.532 NZDT</date>
         <comment/>
          </Approver>
        </approvers>
        <weight>30</weight>
        <id>3</id>
        <stateId>0</stateId>
        <attachments/>
      </ApprovalCheck>
      <ApprovalCheck>
        <name>Edited</name>
        <version>8</version>
        <approvers>
          <Approver>
         <approved>true</approved>
         <user>bgra030</user>
         <date>2008-11-02 10:54:07.903 NZDT</date>
         <comment>Updated references re Wiki, removed unwanted sections</comment>
          </Approver>
        </approvers>
        <weight>10</weight>
        <id>4</id>
        <stateId>0</stateId>
        <attachments/>
      </ApprovalCheck>
      <ApprovalCheck>
        <name>Reviewed</name>
        <version>8</version>
        <approvers>
          <Approver>
         <approved>true</approved>
         <user>bgra030</user>
         <date>2008-11-02 10:54:10.552 NZDT</date>
         <comment/>
          </Approver>
        </approvers>
        <weight>20</weight>
        <id>5</id>
        <stateId>0</stateId>
        <attachments/>
      </ApprovalCheck>
      <ApprovalCheck>
        <name>Signoff</name>
        <version>8</version>
        <approvers>
          <Approver>
         <approved>true</approved>
         <user>bgra030</user>
         <date>2008-11-02 10:54:13.161 NZDT</date>
         <comment/>
          </Approver>
        </approvers>
        <weight>30</weight>
        <id>6</id>
        <stateId>0</stateId>
        <attachments/>
      </ApprovalCheck>
      <ApprovalCheck>
        <name>Edited</name>
        <version>9</version>
        <approvers>
          <Approver>
         <approved>true</approved>
         <user>bgra030</user>
         <date>2009-11-13 08:53:00.649 NZDT</date>
         <comment>Testing approval information</comment>
          </Approver>
        </approvers>
        <weight>10</weight>
        <id>7</id>
        <stateId>0</stateId>
        <attachments/>
      </ApprovalCheck>
      <ApprovalCheck>
        <name>Edited</name>
        <version>9</version>
        <approvers>
          <Approver>
         <approved>false</approved>
         <user>bgra030</user>
         <date>2009-11-13 08:53:13.830 NZDT</date>
         <comment/>
          </Approver>
        </approvers>
        <weight>10</weight>
        <id>8</id>
        <stateId>0</stateId>
        <attachments/>
      </ApprovalCheck>
      <ApprovalCheck>
        <name>Edited</name>
        <version>12</version>
        <approvers>
          <Approver>
         <approved>true</approved>
         <user>bgra030</user>
         <date>2009-11-23 11:08:14.666 NZDT</date>
         <comment>Changes due to self auditing, using Study Audit Checklist and DM Study Checklist</comment>
          </Approver>
        </approvers>
        <weight>10</weight>
        <id>9</id>
        <stateId>0</stateId>
        <attachments/>
      </ApprovalCheck>
      <ApprovalCheck>
        <name>Reviewed</name>
        <version>12</version>
        <approvers>
          <Approver>
         <approved>true</approved>
         <user>bgra030</user>
         <date>2009-11-23 11:08:20.345 NZDT</date>
         <comment/>
          </Approver>
        </approvers>
        <weight>20</weight>
        <id>10</id>
        <stateId>0</stateId>
        <attachments/>
      </ApprovalCheck>
      <ApprovalCheck>
        <name>Signoff</name>
        <version>12</version>
        <approvers>
          <Approver>
         <approved>true</approved>
         <user>bgra030</user>
         <date>2009-11-23 11:08:23.997 NZDT</date>
         <comment/>
          </Approver>
        </approvers>
        <weight>30</weight>
        <id>11</id>
        <stateId>0</stateId>
        <attachments/>
      </ApprovalCheck>
      <ApprovalCheck>
        <name>Edited</name>
        <version>13</version>
        <approvers>
          <Approver>
         <approved>true</approved>
         <user>bgra030</user>
         <date>2011-10-31 10:42:37.703 NZDT</date>
         <comment>No change, just change of name of a linked page</comment>
          </Approver>
        </approvers>
        <weight>10</weight>
        <id>12</id>
        <stateId>0</stateId>
        <attachments/>
      </ApprovalCheck>
      <ApprovalCheck>
        <name>Reviewed</name>
        <version>13</version>
        <approvers>
          <Approver>
         <approved>true</approved>
         <user>bgra030</user>
         <date>2011-10-31 10:42:40.596 NZDT</date>
         <comm
    1 row selected.My query is way off,... I can't even get it to run, let alone getting the record I want without some hard coding...
    Can anyone help?
    Thanks in advance.
    select y.y_name, y.y_version, z.z_approved, z.z_user, z.z_date, z.z_comment
    from WIKI.os_propertyentry t,
         XMLTABLE('$p/ApprovalChecks/ApprovalCheck'
                  PASSING t.text_val as "p"
                  COLUMNS y_name       VARCHAR2(30) PATH 'ApprovalCheck/name',
                          y_version    NUMBER       PATH 'ApprovalCheck/version',
                          Approver     XMLTYPE      PATH 'ApprovalCheck/approvers/Approver/*') y,
         XMLTABLE('$a/Approver'
                  PASSING y.Approver as "a"
                  COLUMNS z_approved  VARCHAR2(8)   PATH 'Approver/approved',
                          z_user      VARCHAR2(30)  PATH 'Approver/user',
                          z_date      DATE          PATH 'Approver/date',
                          z_comment   VARCHAR2(100) PATH 'Approver/comment') z
    where entity_id = 7274716 and entity_key = 'com.comalatech.workflow.approvals'
    and   t.name = 'Reviewed'
    and   t.version = 13;
               PASSING t.text_val as "p"
    ERROR at line 4:
    ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got CLOB

    Further to the above, the query returns a single record okay,...
    SQL > l  
      1  with all_versions as (
      2    select c.title, y.y_name, y.y_version, z.z_approved, z.z_user, z.z_date z_date, z.z_comment,
      3           row_number() over( order by to_timestamp_tz(z_date, 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS.FF3 TZD') desc ) as rn
      4    from wiki.os_propertyentry t, wiki.content c,
      5         XMLTABLE('$p/ApprovalChecks/ApprovalCheck'
      6               PASSING xmltype(t.text_val) as "p"
      7               COLUMNS y_name       VARCHAR2(30) PATH 'name',
      8                    y_version       NUMBER       PATH 'version',
      9                    Approver       XMLTYPE      PATH 'approvers/Approver/*') y,
    10         XMLTABLE('$a'
    11               PASSING y.Approver as "a"
    12               COLUMNS z_approved  VARCHAR2(8)   PATH '/approved',
    13                    z_user      VARCHAR2(30)  PATH '/user',
    14                    z_date      VARCHAR2(30)  PATH '/date',
    15                    z_comment      VARCHAR2(100) PATH '/comment') z
    16    where c.contentid = t.entity_id
    17    and   c.spaceid = (select spaceid from wiki.spaces where spacename = 'Quality')
    18    and   entity_id = 7274716
    19    and entity_key = 'com.comalatech.workflow.approvals'
    20    )
    21  select title, y_name, y_version
    22  from all_versions
    23* where rn = 1
    SQL> /
    TITLE                           Y_NAME                          Y_VERSION
    Quality Audits (NIHI-5001)     Signoff                     17
    1 row selected.... but I want to now query on all records, not just one.
    When I comment out the clause (and entity_id = xxxxx) I now get an error. I should have got ~300 records,.... what do I need to do to make this work?
    SQL > 18
    18*   and   entity_id = 7274716
    SQL> > c /and/-- and
    18*   -- and     entity_id = 7274716
    SQL > l
      1  with all_versions as (
      2    select t.entity_id, c.title, y.y_name, y.y_version, z.z_approved, z.z_user, z.z_date z_date, z.z_comment,
      3           row_number() over( order by to_timestamp_tz(z_date, 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS.FF3 TZD') desc ) as rn
      4    from wiki.os_propertyentry t, wiki.content c,
      5         XMLTABLE('$p/ApprovalChecks/ApprovalCheck'
      6               PASSING xmltype(t.text_val) as "p"
      7               COLUMNS y_name       VARCHAR2(30) PATH 'name',
      8                    y_version       NUMBER       PATH 'version',
      9                    Approver       XMLTYPE      PATH 'approvers/Approver/*') y,
    10         XMLTABLE('$a'
    11               PASSING y.Approver as "a"
    12               COLUMNS z_approved  VARCHAR2(8)   PATH '/approved',
    13                    z_user      VARCHAR2(30)  PATH '/user',
    14                    z_date      VARCHAR2(30)  PATH '/date',
    15                    z_comment      VARCHAR2(100) PATH '/comment') z
    16    where c.contentid = t.entity_id
    17    and   c.spaceid = (select spaceid from wiki.spaces where spacename = 'Quality')
    18    -- and     entity_id = 7274716
    19    and entity_key = 'com.comalatech.workflow.approvals'
    20    )
    21  select entity_id, title, y_name, y_version
    22  from all_versions
    23* where rn = 1
    wikiprod: OPS$IT_DBA > /
              PASSING xmltype(t.text_val) as "p"
    ERROR at line 6:
    ORA-31011: XML parsing failed
    ORA-19202: Error occurred in XML processing
    LPX-00241: entity reference is not well formed
    Error at line 8
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.XMLTYPE", line 272
    ORA-06512: at line 1

  • Pacleanup: A script to clean up package bloat

    Hi all!
    Here is my first real contribution to the Arch community! w00t!
    Do you install packages just to try them out and never end up using them? Do you forget about them and do they just add to the bloat on your system? Do you want to review the packages installed on your system and remove the packages you don't need/want anymore? I do, so I wrote a small script to do just that.
    There may already be a better way to do this that I don't know of. If there is, please do let me know.
    Basically, the script goes through the packages marked as 'explicitly installed' and queries the user whether they want to keep or remove the packages. It does some basic dependency checking that will not remove a package if it is required by a package you want to keep. It stores a list of packages that you have previously selected to keep, so that you don't have to select them every time you run the script. An option to review the list of packages to remove is provided. It also, removes unused dependencies.
    After the script has done its stuff, pacman will display packages to be removed and it will prompt you to accept the changes to be made. So it is pretty safe. You won't end up removing critical packages unless you explicitly allow pacman to do so.
    Suggestions and corrections are most welcome!
    Here it is!
    #!/bin/bash
    #--VARIABLES--
    WDIR="$HOME/.pacleanup"
    EXPLINST="$WDIR/explicitly-installed"
    WRKLIST="$WDIR/working-list"
    DEPLIST="$WDIR/dep-list"
    KEEPS="$WDIR/keep-pkgs"
    REMS="$WDIR/rm-pkgs"
    SAFEREMS="$WDIR/rm-safe"
    TMPREMS="$SAFEREMS.tmp"
    TMPEXPL="$EXPLINST.tmp"
    TMPDEPLIST="$DEPLIST.tmp"
    #/VARIABLES
    set -u
    #--FUNCTIONS--
    #SYSTEM CHECKS
    checks () {
    echo "==> Running checks..."
    #Check user
    guy=`whoami`
    if [ "$guy" = "root" ]
    then
    echo
    echo "==> Please run as normal user with sudo privileges"
    exit 1
    fi
    #Check working directory
    if [ -d $WDIR ]
    then
    echo
    echo "==> $WDIR exists"
    else
    mkdir -p $WDIR
    echo
    echo "==> $WDIR created"
    fi
    #Check working files
    fileCheck $EXPLINST
    fileCheck $REMS
    fileCheck $SAFEREMS
    fileCheck $WRKLIST
    fileCheck $DEPLIST
    #Get list of explicitly installed packages
    getExplInst
    #Process existing list of packages to keep or ceate new file
    if [ -f $KEEPS ]
    then
    keepCheck=`cat $KEEPS`
    if [ -n "$keepCheck" ]
    then
    echo
    echo "==> Old $KEEPS detected!"
    echo "==> You can use this list to automatically keep these packages"
    echo "==> Do you want to keep your old list? [y/n]"
    read ans
    case $ans in
    y)
    touch $KEEPS
    cp $EXPLINST $TMPEXPL
    for keeper in `cat $KEEPS`
    do
    cat $TMPEXPL | sed -e "/^$keeper$/d" > $WRKLIST
    rm $TMPEXPL
    cp $WRKLIST $TMPEXPL
    done
    rm $TMPEXPL
    n)
    rm $KEEPS
    touch $KEEPS
    cp $EXPLINST $WRKLIST
    echo "==> You must choose y or n"
    echo "==> Exiting."
    exit 1
    esac
    else
    fileCheck $KEEPS
    cp $EXPLINST $WRKLIST
    fi
    else
    fileCheck $KEEPS
    cp $EXPLINST $WRKLIST
    fi
    echo
    #WORKING FILE CREATOR
    fileCheck () {
    if [ -f $1 ]
    then
    rm $1
    fi
    touch $1
    #EXPLICITY INSTALLED LIST GENERATOR
    getExplInst () {
    pacman -Qe | cut -d " " -f1 > $EXPLINST
    #QUERY PACKAGE
    queryKeep () {
    for pkg in `cat $WRKLIST`
    do
    echo -e "==> Do you want to keep \033[1m$pkg\033[0m [y/n/i/q/d]"
    read action
    queryAction $action
    echo
    done
    #PROCESS QUERY RESPONSE
    queryAction () {
    case $action in
    y)
    echo "==> Keeping $pkg"
    echo $pkg >> $KEEPS
    n)
    echo "==> Removing $pkg"
    echo $pkg >> $REMS
    i)
    echo "==> $1 Info"
    pacman -Qi $pkg
    echo -e "==> Do you want to keep \033[1m$pkg\033[0m [y/n/i/q/d]"
    read action
    queryAction $action
    q)
    echo "==> Exiting"
    exit 0
    d)
    echo "==> Done with selection"
    break
    *|"")
    echo "==> y=yes n=no i=info q=quit d=done with selection"
    echo "==> Choose y/n/i/q/d"
    read action
    queryAction $action
    esac
    #CHECK FOR DEPENDENCIES
    depCheck () {
    echo
    echo "==> Checking dependencies..."
    cp $REMS $SAFEREMS
    cp $EXPLINST $DEPLIST
    for rmpkg in `cat $SAFEREMS`
    do
    cat $DEPLIST | sed -e "/^$rmpkg$/d" > $TMPDEPLIST
    rm $DEPLIST
    mv $TMPDEPLIST $DEPLIST
    done
    for pkg in `cat $DEPLIST`
    do
    deps=`cat /var/lib/pacman/local/$pkg-*/depends | sed '0,/%OPTDEPENDS%/!d' | grep -v "^%\|^$" | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/ /g'`
    for dirtydep in $deps
    do
    cleandep=`echo $dirtydep | cut -d "<" -f1 | cut -d ">" -f1 | cut -d "=" -f1`
    cat $SAFEREMS | sed -e "/^$cleandep$/d" > $TMPREMS
    rm $SAFEREMS
    mv $TMPREMS $SAFEREMS
    done
    done
    echo "==> Dependency check completed."
    #REVIEW PACKAGES TO REMOVE
    review () {
    queue=`cat $SAFEREMS`
    if [ -z "$queue" ]
    then
    echo "==> No packages selected for removal"
    echo "==> Exiting"
    else
    echo
    echo "==> The following packages are selected for removal:"
    echo "$queue"
    echo "==> Do you wish to modify this selection? [y/n/q]"
    read review
    case $review in
    y)
    rm $WRKLIST
    rm $REMS
    mv $SAFEREMS $WRKLIST
    queryKeep
    depCheck
    review
    n)
    echo "==> Proceeding to remove packages and orphans..."
    sudo pacman -Rsn `cat $SAFEREMS`
    q)
    echo "==> Exiting."
    echo "==> You must choose y/n/q"
    review
    esac
    fi
    #CLEAN UP WORKING FILES
    cleanUp () {
    rm $EXPLINST
    rm $REMS
    rm $SAFEREMS
    rm $WRKLIST
    rm $DEPLIST
    #/FUNCTIONS
    #--RUN--
    set -e
    checks
    queryKeep
    depCheck
    review
    cleanUp
    #/RUN
    Changelog:
    25 March 2010
    - Changed dependency checking to use /var/lib/pacman/local/*/depends instead of pacman
    Last edited by drsjlazar (2010-03-25 20:43:03)

    itsbrad212 wrote:well done sir. You should add an option to skip to the end though
    Thank you.
    If you mean to skip going through the selection of whether to keep or remove packages, there is an option. Inputting 'd' (for 'Done' ) will skip the rest of the selection process and go right to dependency checking.
    Did you mean something else?

  • Using CF8 on Linux

    Ok, I'm new to using CF on Linux, so here's my question.
    On Windows you have to tell CF what sites you want the CF
    server to serve up
    pages for. Is there a similar way to do this in Linux?
    I installed CF on Fedora, and can get to the CF admin page
    via Firefox just
    fine. When I try to view a webpage on
    http://localhost/page.cfm it
    displays
    the page, but the CF tags aren't being translated, they show
    up as text on
    the page.....

    Steve,
    How are you getting to CFAdmin? Does your URL include port
    8500 or similar? If so, the administrator is working thru
    coldfusion's internal webserver (JWS). I suspect that is what is
    going on.
    If that is the case, review the installation guide for
    configuring webservers. You will have several options to get CF
    connected to apache or whatever webserver you are running. Also,
    details like CF version, webserver type, etc. are useful when you
    post.

  • Any help with to many activations?

    Me too have the same problem, in the instalation and update process of my reader, aparently have used the 6 units allowed, and now I can not use my reader I get the following error:
    E_ACT_TOO_MANY_ACTIVATIONS http://adeactivate.adobe.com/adept/Activate 3281:281:8281 urn:uuid:76a50ecb-410c-4517-8230-bd7da275ca54
    I only have one reader and one portable computer on windows XP.  So I do not understand how could I get used all the 6 devices allowed
    any help!  Please!
    Javier

    The page you sent looks like you are trying to create an AdobeID (which you should already have), instead of trying to submit a web case.
    Step by step instructions:
    1.) Go to: http://www.adobe.com/support/digitaleditions
    2.) Click on "Submit a web case"
    3.) Login (if needed)
    4.) This will get you correctly to: https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/support/index.cfm?event=porta
    5.) In the Techinical support tab:
         a.) Set the issue type to "other"
         b.) Select "Additional Products" and select "Digital Editions"
         c.) Press Continue
    6.) A new page called "Create a support case" will appear" - enter in the appropriate informat - be sure to include the exact and full error text in the description
    7.) Press Review & Submit
    8.) (new page "Review Case") Review the details for correctness and click "Submit"

Maybe you are looking for

  • What is the diffrence among Fetch, Push and Transaction in agentry

    Hi friends, As three of these are used to update the targeted object at backend system. Then what are the specific requirements of these three(Push,fetch,Transaction)

  • Officejet Pro 8000 A809 - can I print just black and have empty color cartridge?

    I saw in a previous post entitled "PSC 1410 - can I print just black and have empty color cartridge" that the printer does color underprinting even when printing black and white, to prevent bleeding. My question is, is this also true when selecting t

  • Problem getting the selecteditem in tree while fetching data through httpserivces

    I have a mxml file in which a want to display data in tree structure. The supplied to the tree is fetched from database through httpservice the mxml file content is : <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><mx:Application  xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.c

  • Problems after TM restore

    After replacing a dead hard drive, I was able to restore from TM. However, I've been having problems ever since and I'm wondering if it is a problem with permissions. I can't drag/drop folders or files anymore in the Finder. I also can't use iSync an

  • Generic icon

    Since re-installing iChat (for the reasons stated in this thread: http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=4206420#4206420 ) iChat has a generic application icon and refuses to open, i.e. unexpetedly closes on startup. Has anyone any ideas