Cat 4500 showing error %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te3/1: Rx power low alarm

Hello Friends,
i have catalyst 4503 series switch and i am trying to configure it, there is not any physical media connected to the switch yet.
but i have installed the X2-10GB-SM modules in its module (WS-X4606-X2-E)
without any cable or connectivity with other switches.
i am facing the error which is
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te3/1: Rx power low alarm; Operating value: -30.0 dBm, Threshold value: -18.4 dBm.
*Jul 18 07:34:13.710: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te3/2: Rx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -13.9 dBm.
*Jul 18 07:34:13.710: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te3/3: Rx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -13.9 dBm
any idea to get off this problem?
thanks

Gents,
Looks like something is amuck as I just received a new 4507 as well and I am getting similar messages. Anyone have an idea as to what is going on? I too have not connected anything to this yet, just doing a burn in. I am installing into a cancer center and need to have this ready by the first.
regards,
Stephen
Below is the info needed:
CC-4507RE#sh mod
Chassis Type : WS-C4507R+E
Power consumed by backplane : 40 Watts
Mod Ports Card Type                             Model             Serial No.
---+-----+--------------------------------------+------------------+-----------
1   48 10/100/1000BaseT UPOE E Series         WS-X4748-UPOE+E   CAT1621L24P
2   48 10/100/1000BaseT UPOE E Series         WS-X4748-UPOE+E   CAT1621L24M
3     4 Sup 7-E 10GE (SFP+), 1000BaseX (SFP)   WS-X45-SUP7-E     CAT1617L5UY
4     4 Sup 7-E 10GE (SFP+), 1000BaseX (SFP)   WS-X45-SUP7-E     CAT1619L1D3
5   12 10GE SFP+                             WS-X4712-SFP+E     CAT1618L1LD
M MAC addresses                   Hw Fw           Sw               Status
--+--------------------------------+---+------------+----------------+---------
1 a493.4c9f.a37c to a493.4c9f.a3ab 1.1                               Ok
2 a493.4c9f.a43c to a493.4c9f.a46b 1.1                               Ok
3 a493.4cd4.32c0 to a493.4cd4.32c3 2.1 15.0(1r)SG5 03.03.00.SG      Ok
4 a493.4cd4.32c4 to a493.4cd4.32c7 2.1 15.0(1r)SG5 03.03.00.SG     Ok
5 a493.4c55.6cb8 to a493.4c55.6cc3 1.1                               Ok
Mod Redundancy role     Operating mode     Redundancy status
----+-------------------+-------------------+----------------------------------
3   Active Supervisor   SSO                 Active
4   Standby Supervisor SSO                 Standby hot
ROM: 15.0(1r)SG5
CC-4507RE uptime is 2 weeks, 5 hours, 47 minutes
Uptime for this control processor is 2 weeks, 5 hours, 49 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on
System image file is "bootflash:cat4500e-universalk9.SPA.03.03.00.SG.151-1.SG.bi
n"
Jawa Revision 7, Snowtrooper Revision 0x0.0x1C
*Jul 20 07:24:07.884 UTC: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te3/1: Rx power low al
arm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value:-12.4 dBm.
*Jul 20 14:28:18.155 UTC: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te4/1: Rx power low ala
rm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.4 dBm.

Similar Messages

%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm

Hi,
I am facing a strange problem in one of my Cisco Catalyst 4900M switch. We have a ten gig WAN link which went down (error-disabled) couple of weeks back with logs suggesting Low TX power.
Tried followingtroubleshooting approach, but it did not resolve the problem.
SFP replaced
Tried connecting the link on a different port.
Fibers tested and found to be OK
Performed loop test and was able to see the loop on both end of the P2P link.
Replaced the Cables between PTT demarcation till switch patch panel.
Switch Logs:
IOS Version: bootflash:cat4500e-entservices-mz.150-2.SG1.bin
Model: Cisco Catalyst 4900M
*Jun 19 12:32:36.582: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: link-flap error detected on Te1/1, putting Te1/1 in err-disable state
*Jun 19 12:34:04.154: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 12:44:04.254: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 12:54:04.354: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 13:04:04.454: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 13:14:04.558: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 13:24:04.658: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 13:34:04.761: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 13:44:04.861: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 13:54:04.961: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 14:04:05.061: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 14:14:05.161: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 14:24:05.261: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 14:34:05.361: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 14:44:05.461: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 14:54:05.561: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
*Jun 19 15:04:05.661: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -12.2 dBm.
Switch1#
Switch1#
Switch1#
Switch1#sh int te1/1
TenGigabitEthernet1/1 is down, line protocol is down (err-disabled)
Hardware is Ten Gigabit Ethernet Port, address is 2c54.2de6.5100 (bia 2c54.2de6.5100)
Description: ***P2P ***
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 10Gb/s, link type is auto, media type is 10GBase-LR
input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 02:39:04, output never, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 2w0d
Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
     2367 packets input, 199072 bytes, 0 no buffer
     Received 2367 broadcasts (2367 multicasts)
     1 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     5 input errors, 4 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
     0 input packets with dribble condition detected
     5951 packets output, 453948 bytes, 0 underruns
     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 13 interface resets
     0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
     0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
Switch1#
Switch1#sh int te1/1 transceiver detail
ITU Channel not available (Wavelength not available),
Transceiver is internally calibrated.
mA: milliamperes, dBm: decibels (milliwatts), NA or N/A: not applicable.
++ : high alarm, + : high warning, - : low warning, -- : low alarm.
A2D readouts (if they differ), are reported in parentheses.
The threshold values are calibrated.
                              High Alarm High Warn Low Warn   Low Alarm
          Temperature         Threshold   Threshold Threshold Threshold
Port       (Celsius)          (Celsius)   (Celsius) (Celsius) (Celsius)
Te1/1       30.7                74.0        70.0         0.0       -4.0
                              High Alarm High Warn Low Warn   Low Alarm
           Voltage            Threshold   Threshold Threshold Threshold
Port       (Volts)            (Volts)     (Volts)    (Volts)    (Volts)
Te1/1      0.00                   N/A         N/A         N/A        N/A
           Optical            High Alarm High Warn Low Warn   Low Alarm
           Transmit Power     Threshold   Threshold Threshold Threshold
Port       (dBm)              (dBm)       (dBm)      (dBm)      (dBm)
Te1/1      -40.0                 4.4         0.4        -8.2      -12.2
           Optical            High Alarm High Warn Low Warn   Low Alarm
           Receive Power      Threshold   Threshold Threshold Threshold
Port       (dBm)              (dBm)       (dBm)      (dBm)      (dBm)
Te1/1      -12.3                 4.4         0.4       -14.4      -18.4

I did replace the SFP with a new one.
Interface Te1/2 is up and working.
SESK_P2P10G-4900MSOD-SW1#sh int te1/2 transceiver de
ITU Channel not available (Wavelength not available),
Transceiver is internally calibrated.
mA: milliamperes, dBm: decibels (milliwatts), NA or N/A: not applicable.
++ : high alarm, + : high warning, - : low warning, -- : low alarm.
A2D readouts (if they differ), are reported in parentheses.
The threshold values are calibrated.
                              High Alarm High Warn Low Warn   Low Alarm
          Temperature         Threshold   Threshold Threshold Threshold
Port       (Celsius)          (Celsius)   (Celsius) (Celsius) (Celsius)
Te1/2       34.6                74.0        70.0         0.0       -4.0
                              High Alarm High Warn Low Warn   Low Alarm
           Voltage            Threshold   Threshold Threshold Threshold
Port       (Volts)            (Volts)     (Volts)    (Volts)    (Volts)
Te1/2      3.22                   N/A         N/A         N/A        N/A
           Optical            High Alarm High Warn Low Warn   Low Alarm
           Transmit Power     Threshold   Threshold Threshold Threshold
Port       (dBm)              (dBm)       (dBm)      (dBm)      (dBm)
Te1/2       -1.5                 4.4         0.4        -8.2      -12.2
           Optical            High Alarm High Warn Low Warn   Low Alarm
           Receive Power      Threshold   Threshold Threshold Threshold
Port       (dBm)              (dBm)       (dBm)      (dBm)      (dBm)
Te1/2       -3.6                 4.4         0.4       -14.4      -18.4

CET: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Rx power high warning; Operating value: -0.9 dBm, Threshold value: -1.0 dBm.

Hei
we have some switches that are connected with our nexus switches via SFP-10GLR. all switches are ok but only one is getting warnings in the logs saying: CET: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1: Rx power high warning; Operating value: -0.9 dBm, Threshold value: -1.0 dBm.
all the SFP,s are same in alle switches.

%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION Vs SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION.
The first one is printed for the ports that are configured, but not connected/active.
You can avoid such error messages simply shutting down unused ports.
The latter indicates that there is a real threshold violation.
For more details on these error messages, check out.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/15.1/XE_330SG/system/messages/emsg.html#wp1634341
Action Plan:
========
Can you please try clearing the interface counters, so that we can notice the frequency of errors.
Also I researched on the logs that we are observing on our device and have seen cases where the issue has been resolved by physically removing and reinserting transceiver.
Please refer below link for more details:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Errordecoder/index.cgi?action=search&counter=0&paging=5&links=reference&index=all&query=SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION

Messages: SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION

Hi Folks,
I have new switch CISCO WS-C4510R-E with SUP6-E. I am getting following messages on my console.
*Jan 27 03:04:08.515: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te5/2: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -11.3 dBm.
*Jan 27 03:04:09.707: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te6/2: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -11.3 dBm.
What is wrong with my power or something. Below pasted show power and show power modules out put.Do I need to contact TAC? any help is highly appricated.
SW#show power
Power                                             Fan      Inline
Supply Model No          Type       Status       Sensor   Status
PS1     PWR-C45-6000ACV   AC 6000W   good         good     good
PS1-1                         110V   good
PS1-2                         110V   good
PS2     PWR-C45-6000ACV   AC 6000W   good         good     good
PS2-1                         110V   good
PS2-2                         110V   good
Power supplies needed by system    : 1
Power supplies currently available : 2
Power Summary                      Maximum
(in Watts)              Used     Available
System Power (12V)       1125        1700
Inline Power (-50V)         0         935
Backplane Power (3.3V)     40          40
Total                    1165 (not to exceed Total Maximum Available = 2100)
                             Output Power To Chassis            Input Power
                    ======================================= ==================
Power Measurement   System Power (12V) Inline Power (-50V)
(in Watts)                (+/- 12W)        (+/- 50W)              (+/- 5%)
PS1                        168                    0                  280
PS2                        156                   50                  343
Total                      324                   50                  623
SW#show power module
                             Watts Used of System Power(12V)
Mod   Model                 budgeted instantaneous peak   out of reset in reset
1    WS-X4548-RJ45V+           60         --        --         60          25
2    WS-X4548-RJ45V+           60         --        --         60          25
3    WS-X4548-RJ45V+           60         --        --         60          25
4    WS-X4548-RJ45V+           60         --        --         60          25
5    WS-X45-SUP6-E            260         --        --        260         260
6    WS-X45-SUP6-E            185         --        --        185         185
7    WS-X4548-RJ45V+           60         --        --         60          25
8    WS-X4548-RJ45V+           60         --        --         60          25
9    WS-X4548-RJ45V+           60         --        --         60          25
10    WS-X4548-RJ45V+           60         --        --         60          25
--   Fan Tray                 200         --        --        --          --
       Total                  1125         --        --        925         645
                        Watts used of Chassis Inline Power (-50V)
                        Inline Power Admin Inline Power Oper
Mod   Model                PS     Device       PS     Device     Efficiency
1    WS-X4548-RJ45V+          0        0         17       16          94
2    WS-X4548-RJ45V+          0        0         11       10          94
3    WS-X4548-RJ45V+          0        0         11       10          94
4    WS-X4548-RJ45V+          0        0         11       10          94
5    WS-X45-SUP6-E            -        -          -        -           -
6    WS-X45-SUP6-E            -        -          -        -           -
7    WS-X4548-RJ45V+          0        0          5        5          94
8    WS-X4548-RJ45V+          0        0         17       16          94
9    WS-X4548-RJ45V+          0        0         11       10          94
10    WS-X4548-RJ45V+          0        0         11       10          94

Hello,
I have same issues on our network on all non Cisco X2 modules starting on nearly the same day (devices have nearly same update). I can't say that it is only cosmetic nature due to the fact that after a lot of these messages happened I registered SPT topology changes. This happened on several of my devices but it is not very often. For our customers it is a two second hit, where services are not available. Our software is on the 15.0 release train so a lot of possibilities to upgrade to higher versions are not given at this time.
Are in the above mentioned Cisco internal Bug (ID CSCth08212/CSCte94616) additional information which can be helpful but are not open to people outside TAC?
With kind regards
Stefan
I forgot to mention that the message in my case describes a lot of temperature alerts (ranging from -130°C up to 130°C) that are violated and less of alerts belonging to the power.

SFF8472-3-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION on ME-3800X

Hi All,
Please see the logs below on Cisco ME-3800X, We are using IOS "me380x-universalk9-mz.153-2.S.bin"
%SFF8472-3-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Gi0/8: Rx power low warning; Operating value: -20.3 dBm, Threshold value: -19.0 dBm.
is this bug ?anyone encounter this error ?
Please help on this.
Regards.

Similar symptoms are in Cisco IOS Release 15.1(3)S5 but it was resolved
CSCtu42387
Symptoms: Gigabit and 10 Gigabit Fiber link reporting threshold violation alarm in Cisco ME3600, Cisco ME3800, and Cisco 7600 devices. The "%SFF8472-3-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Gi0/11: Rx power high alarm" error message is seen on ports.
Conditions: This symptom is observed on Cisco ME3600, Cisco ME3800, and Cisco 7600 devices. The messages are seen with the interface shut or no shut.
SFF8472-3-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION Gi5/1: Rx power low alarm; Operating value:
-28.5 dBm, Threshold value: -24.0 dBm
Workaround: Fixing the fiber signal issue or disconnecting the fiber from the transceiver has been known to stop the messages

WS-X45-SUP8-E: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION

Hello,
I got a WS-X45-SUP8-E Core switch with TenGigabitEthernet ports.
one of the port on the core give the following error:
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te5/4: Rx power low warning; Operating value: -12.4 dBm, Threshold value: -9.9 dBm.
The other switch connected on this link doesn't.
It also doesn't seem like a Bug because the rest of the port are up and running just fine, same switches and SFP.
I already changed the SFP and patch kabels.
any ideas??
Thanks.

Hello,
i changed the patches between 2 switches and now we got the error on a other switch. so the fiber between the core and access switches is giving the problems.
in the on coming weeks where going to replace the fiber cable.
MANY THANKS!!!

Cisco 2960S SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION

Hi All
I have a issue connecting my Cisco 3750X 12 port fibre switch to my Cisco 2960S 24Port switch using Multi Mode Fibre.
I have Mode condtioning cables connecting to the SFP (GLC-LH-SMD) on the 3750 via a fibre patch panel which bring me to the 2960s with its Mode conditioning cable and SFP (GLC-LH-SMD).
The fibre port on the Cisco 2960S was up for all of 10 mins and has gone out with the following error message.
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Gi1/0/26: Rx power high warning; Operating value: -2.7 dBm, Threshold value: -3.0 dBm.
I did a show int transceiver command and got the following output.
DS-THN-SW3#show interfaces transceiver
If device is externally calibrated, only calibrated values are printed.
++ : high alarm, + : high warning, - : low warning, -- : low alarm.
NA or N/A: not applicable, Tx: transmit, Rx: receive.
mA: milliamperes, dBm: decibels (milliwatts).
                                 Optical   Optical
           Temperature Voltage Tx Power Rx Power
Port       (Celsius)    (Volts) (dBm)     (dBm)
Gi1/0/26     25.2       3.31      -5.1     -28.5
All SFP's are new as is the Multi Mode Fibre cable running from one building to another.

Hi All,
One of member port of port channel was flapping and Here is the error message
Error log:
.Mar 17 08:27:37: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te6/1/1: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -11.3 dBm.
Cisco TAC analyse the issue under 629566213 but their initial advices was not much experience oriented.
Finally I have resolved the issue just by entering following command.
switch 6 frulink reload
Janaka Wellege Bsc.Eng
University of Peradeniya.

SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION

Hello,
I have a switch 3750X connected to a nexus 5000 via DWDM SFP (C3KX-NM-10G). The IOS of the 3750X is universalk9 12.2(58)SE2 and of the Nexus 5.2(1)N1(2a).
I get all 10 seconds on the 3750x the following error:
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te2/1/2: Rx power high alarm; Operating value: -1.7 dBm, Threshold value: -6.0 dBm.
When I add a buffer attenuator, nothing changed.
Is this a bug of cisco or what can I do?
BR
Andreas

Hello,
I have a switch 3750X connected to a nexus 5000 via DWDM SFP (C3KX-NM-10G). The IOS of the 3750X is universalk9 12.2(58)SE2 and of the Nexus 5.2(1)N1(2a).
I get all 10 seconds on the 3750x the following error:
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te2/1/2: Rx power high alarm; Operating value: -1.7 dBm, Threshold value: -6.0 dBm.
When I add a buffer attenuator, nothing changed.
Is this a bug of cisco or what can I do?
BR
Andreas

Optic power levels - %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION

Can some explain this to me...
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/0/1: Tx power low alarm
If I am getting a LOW TX alert the issue can't be with the fibre and it has to be something do to with the optic / line card / software or chassis. I presume DOM is reporting this before the light is put onto the link... as in before it even touches the fibre.
Any help is much appreciated.

Hi
It could be a bad transceiver. Did you try reseating the transceiver once?
If not helping please try replacing it and check.
Thanks,
M

SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION ISSUE IN WS-C2960X-48TD-L SWITCH

Hi,
I am getting Rx power low warning message in cisco WS-C2960X-48TD-L SWITCH. we are using same cisco SFP module at both end.
SFP Module Details:
PID: SFP-10G-SR
Error Messages
Apr 15 13:34:35.457: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te2/0/1: Rx power low warning; Operating value: -10.8 dBm, Threshold value: -9.9 dBm.
Apr 15 13:34:34.890: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te2/0/1: Rx power low warning; Operating value: -10.8 dBm, Threshold value: -9.9 dBm.
Apr 15 13:44:37.217: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te2/0/1: Rx power low warning; Operating value: -10.6 dBm, Threshold value: -9.9 dBm.
Apr 15 13:44:36.647: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te2/0/1: Rx power low warning; Operating value: -10.7 dBm, Threshold value: -9.9 dBm.
Apr 15 13:54:38.988: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te2/0/1: Rx power low warning; Operating value: -11.0 dBm, Threshold value: -9.9 dBm.
Please tell me how can i fix this issues.
Regards,
Neeraj

Hello,
I have same issues on our network on all non Cisco X2 modules starting on nearly the same day (devices have nearly same update). I can't say that it is only cosmetic nature due to the fact that after a lot of these messages happened I registered SPT topology changes. This happened on several of my devices but it is not very often. For our customers it is a two second hit, where services are not available. Our software is on the 15.0 release train so a lot of possibilities to upgrade to higher versions are not given at this time.
Are in the above mentioned Cisco internal Bug (ID CSCth08212/CSCte94616) additional information which can be helpful but are not open to people outside TAC?
With kind regards
Stefan
I forgot to mention that the message in my case describes a lot of temperature alerts (ranging from -130°C up to 130°C) that are violated and less of alerts belonging to the power.

Sites Taking too much time to open and shows error

hi,
i've setup sharepoint 2013 environement correctly and created a site collection everything was working fine but suddenly now when i am trying to open that site collection or central admin site it's taking too much time to open a page but most of the time
does not open any page or central admin site and shows following error
event i go to logs folder under 15 hive but nothing useful found please tell me why it takes about 10-12 minutes to open a site or any page and then shows above shown error.

This usually happens if you are low on hardware requirements. Check whether your machine confirms with the required software and hardware requirements.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262485.aspx
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/58370/minimum-real-world-system-requirements-for-sharepoint-2013
Please remember to up-vote or mark the reply as answer if you find it helpful.

11i Login Page is showing 'Error on Page' while using IE 7

Hi DBAs,
I am using Oracle 11.5.10.2 with DB 10.2.0.4 (Single Instance). The EBS is on RUP6 and using JDK 1.6.0_12.
I was using Firefox and not getting any issue. I used first time IE-7 (7.0.5x) to access the application. I noticed that Pressing the 'Login' button on Login Page , it was saying in the left bottom of the IE says 'Error on page' and was not navigate to any page or did not perform any action.
I verified all the services and everything was OK. While using Firefox , I was able to navigate the application w/o any issue.
Using IE 7 , I am able to access
http://host.domain:8000/OA_HTML/fndvald.jsp?username=sysadmin&;password=sysadmin
Most of the stuff seems to be working fine while logging in using above URL but the 'GO' buttons are throwing same error in IE 'Error on page'. Rest of the Bottons like 'Edit Navigator' , 'Edit Favorites' are working fine but when on any Page I press the 'Go' button then IE showing Error. It seems to me that when a button need to navigate to next page then IE saying 'Error on page' but when a button have to lunch a new page it is working fine.
All the responsibilities and links are working fine. Application Navigation using Firefox is working absolutely fine.
Seeking your advise and suggestions to resolve the issue.
Thanks
-Samar-

Hi Samar,
You can clear the cache as follows (login as applmgr user, and source the application env file):
$ cd $COMMON_TOP/_pages
$ rm -R *
ML Note: 285218.1 is not helpful as I am on later version of EBS (11.5.10.2 with RUP6 and Developer6i Patchset 19). At Client side I am using Windows XP SP3 with IE 7.0.5.x with JInit 1.3.21 and JRE 1.6.0.12.Did you review the steps under "Recommended MSIE Browser Settings" section?
Can you reproduce the issue with JInitiator? If yes, any errors in the JInitiator console window? Enable debug (you may also enable trace for Sun JRE) and see if any errors are reported there.
Note: 549423.1 - How to enable tracing and logging for Sun JRE (Native Plug-in)
https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=549423.1
Regards,
Hussein

Tds report generation showing error

hi experts ,
in printing of tds certificate showing error .
"no data selected for printing " mess no:8i 000
the problem is comming when i maintained tds certifate no configaration .
without that tds form printing is working ?
please help me in this issue ?
thanks .
deepthi ?

Hi,
Check ur TDS certificate no. ranges again.
At the time of print preview of certificate, you will not be able to view the certificate no. but once you print it, you will get the certificate no. as well.
Regards
Anuj Agarwal

How to show error message in a report program

Hello Guys,
I am making a report using smartforms. I am successful in showing data but problem is if if i put a value in parameters that does not exist is database, the smartform runs and related fields shows as empty fields. But the form is running. I want to show error message if the parameter values dose not matches with the database values. The message will show as Document not exists
So i used related error msg here like
if sy-subrc ne 0.
          message e357.
           endif.
But it is not working for passing values to smartform. It works if i use in classical report. Plz help me on this issue.
Thanks,
Rosaline.

>
Rosaline. wrote:
> Thanks all for reply. Should i have to use message before call function 'SSF_FUNCTION_MODULE_NAME' ? I tried it but not working.
>
>
if it_final[] is not initial.
>*             if sy-subrc ne 0. ---> "Remove this condition check, it not required
>            Message e000(8i) with 'Parameter value not found'.
>            endif.
> *            endif. ---> "remove this
>
Hi,
Sy-subrc doesnt need to be validated here, remove that If condition and check again.
Regards,
Karthik D

TS3638 i have an internet connection but when i open app store it shows error message "cannot connect to app store".when i try to sign in with my valid apple ID and password it says "connection failed".i tried keychain access settings but it did not help.

i have an internet connection but when i open app store it shows error message "cannot connect to app store".when i try to sign in with my valid apple ID and password it says "connection failed".i tried keychain access settings but it did not help.please help me!!

Open Sysem Preferences from your Apple () menu top left in your screen then select the Firewall tab.
Make sure the Firewall is turned off.

Cat 4500 showing error %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te3/1: Rx power low alarm

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for