Catalyst 2960-x Tel 1 and g49, bug

Hi Cisco Community
I am experiencing a very strang bug or it's just a "feature". We are setting up 3 Catalyst 2960-x (EX5) as a stack. Te 1/0/1 and Te 2/0/1 are bundled as Etherchannel. (works fine "In-channel-group")
But we just can not connect anything else to Te 1/0/2 or Te 2/0/2.
When i checked the "sh run" i noticed that there are the Ports g49 and g50. What should be Te 1 and Te 2.
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/49
switchport access vlan 901
switchport trunk native vlan 901
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/50
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,10,20,30,40,50,761,901
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/0/1
description Ecosw2-1:Te1
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,10,20,30,40,50,761,901
switchport mode trunk
srr-queue bandwidth share 1 30 35 5
priority-queue out
mls qos trust cos
macro description cisco-switch
auto qos trust
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
spanning-tree vlan 1,10,20,30,40,50,60,761,901 port-priority 64
channel-group 1 mode active
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/0/2
description Ecovm05:1
switchport access vlan 901
switchport trunk native vlan 901
Connecting my Blade to Te 1/0/2 or g50 just will not bring up any link.
Can somebody help me out here?
Best regards

Hello Ajay,
This is hardware failure. Please replace it.
Another useful post i found
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12251826/brom-boot-2960xr-switch
Hope this helps
******Please rate useful posts******
Thanks,
Madhu

Similar Messages

SFP Mini-GBIC for Catalyst 2960

We are looking at getting the SFP Mini-GBIC from HP HP-J4858C. This transceiver module is Gigabit-SX-LC Mini-GBIC. Will this module work on our Catalyst 2960 PoE switches and will it also work using a MultiMode fiber?

I've used non-Cisco GBICs successfully in Cisco gear. In the event of a problem related to the link, the TAC MAY refer you back to the HP or suggest using a Cisco transceiver.
Running a multimode connection that close to the length limit is not the best idea but if that's all you have installed (and you can't get a single mode link installed) then it is what it is. A single mode GBIC WILL NOT operate over multimode fiber.
The high level specs cite distance but the real indicator of usability is better characterized by loss. As long as you getting adequate light levels at the receiver, you will be OK. Problem is, it's not easy to tell light levels (on a non-SMD type transceiver such as Leo suggested) without some relatively costly measurement equipment.

Bandwidth monitoring on a Catalyst 2960

Hello all, I'm working with two Catalyst 2960 switches and I would like to know if there is a way to monitor bandwidth on individual ports. Ideally I would like to have one graph showing a bandwidth usage reading on each port. I tried using the Network Assistant to accomplish this, but I was only able to view one port at a time. I also tried using a traffic graphing program from Paessler, but a MIB file is needed to allow the program to connect to the switch. When I ran a search on the network management page the 2960 was not on the list for MIB supported products. Is this type of graph possible to do? Or is there a more effective way to accomplish what I would like to do. Any ideas or suggestions would be helpful.

Hi, we have just swapped all our avaya switches with catalyst 2960 (12, 24 and 48 ports) and 3750 (48 ports with 10gig module).
How do I find what port I should monitor for bandwith graphs?
Target[10.0.0.22_loc1]: 1:@10.0.0.22:

Last version Cisco Catalyst 2960-24PC-L Switch (bugs study)

Hi team,
I need know, what´s the last IOS version to Cisco Catalyst 2960-24PC-L Switch and understand the bug study about these versions?
How make a bug study?
If you have any information, please let me know.
Regards,
Yerko.

Latest release as of January 14th is 15.0.2-SE5 (Release Nov 6, 2013)
There aren't any public utilities in the Cisco website that provides you with a bug study.
We have a bug tracker https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/?referring_site=popular but it will be extremely time consuming to identify each bugs and if you are affected.
If you are a Cisco Advanced customer with optimization services in your contract, this deliverable can be done for you at no cost.

Cisco Catalyst 2960-X and Cisco Prime compatibility

Hello All,
I had review all the compatibility matrix of versions of Cisco Prime 1.2, 1.4 and 2.0, and just can't find the Cisco Catalyst 2960-X series as a listed device, which really surprises me.
Can you clear that out??
Thanks,

The 2960X (and XR) support was added with Device Pack 2 for PI 2.0. It was released on 22 January 2014 and is available here.
(PI 2.1 won't be out until later this year, release date not yet announced.)
Following are the 2960X/XR types added:
Cisco Catalyst 2960-X Series Switches
Device Type
SYSOIDS
S/W Version
Software
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1699
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48FPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1690
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48LPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1691
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1692
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1693
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1694
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48FPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1695
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48LPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1696
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1697
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1698
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PSK-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1700
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48LPS-S Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1701
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PS-S Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1702
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48TS-LL Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1703
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24TS-LL Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1704
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960-XR Series Switches
Device Type
SYSOIDS
S/W Version
Software
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1797
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1798
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1799
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1800
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1801
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1802
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1803
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1804
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1805
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1806
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1807
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1808
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1809
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1810
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1811
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1812
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1813
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1814
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1815
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1816
>=12.1
IOS

Catalyst 2960 and SGE500 switches

Hi,
Can we on the same network use Cisco Catalyst 2960 and Cisco SGE500 switches and share the same VLANs ?

Hi,
I didn't find VLAN support in key feautures of SGE500 but I'm sure it is there. For VLAN sharing you must configure trunk between switches. The number of VLAN must be the same (exluded some cases).
For sharing VLAN information (VLAN count, names etc) the switches must support VTP protocol, not sure that SGE500 support it. But VTP is not necessary for trunking between switches.

EtherChannel between 6006 (catos) and Catalyst 2960 HELP

Hi All,
I want to create an etherchannel between 6006 (catos) and Catalyst 2960 to have failover and load balace.
My ports on 6006 (catos) 6/37,6/47 and on 2960 giga 0/1 and giga 0/2.
I have checked on 6006 it supports channel.
Please help to configure this.
Thanks,
AS

AS
Use this doc as a guide and if you have further questions please come back -
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094953.shtml#specialconsid
Jon

Catalyst 4900M and Catalyst 2960S-48FPS-L interconnection

I have Catalyst 4900M as distribution level and several Catalyst 2960S-48FPS-L as access devices.
I am going to use "WS-X4908-10GE 8 Port 10 Gigabit Module Switch"
With CVR-X2-SFP10G converter module I can get 10Gig on optical ports from Catalyst 4900M side, but Catalyst 2960S-48FPS-L support only 1 Gig optical standard on their SFP ports. Will it work (optical 10Gig<->1Gig) or any other suggestions?

You've got an X2 port, don't you? If you do, then why don't you purchase a TwinGig converter.
The Cisco TwinGig Converter Module (below) converts a single 10 Gigabit Ethernet X2 interface into two Gigabit Ethernet port slots that can be populated with SFP optics, enabling customers to use Gigabit Ethernet SFPs on the same card in combination with 10 Gigabit Ethernet X2 optics.

Problem with Cisco Catalyst 2960

I've got a problem with the Catalyst 2960 / 24TCL switch. The Flash-directory was empty. After I copy with xmodem the firmware bin-file into the flash-directory and installed it .. I miss the HTML-Directory. Can somebody tell me how I can get it back?

SSwitch3#test cable-diagnostics tdr int g1/0/16
TDR test started on interface Gi1/0/16
A TDR test can take a few seconds to run on an interface
Use 'show cable-diagnostics tdr' to read the TDR results.
SSwitch3#show cable-diagnostics tdr int g1/0/16
TDR test last run on: June 27 13:39:21
Interface Speed Local pair Pair length        Remote pair Pair status
Gi1/0/16 1000M Pair A     52   +/- 10 meters Pair A      Normal
                Pair B     52   +/- 10 meters Pair B      Normal
                Pair C     52   +/- 10 meters Pair C      Normal
                Pair D     52   +/- 10 meters Pair D      Normal
SSwitch3#

Troubleshooting Fiber Connection on a Catalyst 2960

I am trying to test my fiber connectivity on a Catalyst 2960 before I deploy it. So what I thought I would do is connect it to another switch in my office with a open port for the fiber connection. The other switch is a Catalyst 3560G. Here are the port configurations:
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100
switchport mode trunk
macro description cisco-switch
interface GigabitEthernet0/25
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100
switchport mode trunk
The first one is the catalyst 2960 and the 3560G is the second.
When you show the interface for each of these it shows that it recognizes the media but the line protocal and the GigbitEthernet Port is down.
Any Ideas?

Sorry... a fiber optic cable with a connector on each end.
To aid in troubleshooting, many times we loopback the signal back to the originating device. An optical loopback is just connecting the transmit (Tx) to the receive (Rx).
The multimode SFP/GBIC transceiver you are using will allow you to directly connect the Transmit and Receive ports without damage to the unit. This should provide you with a green link LED.
If so, then you can reconnect your fibers and loopback (connect the two fibers together) at the far end of the fiber link (use an optical adapter) and see if you get a green LED.

Catalyst 2960 SF Stacking

Hi
I am stacking 6 Catalyst 2960 SF Series PoE 48 ports, I am using the Bladestack cable. I plug it in from 1 to 2 on all the switches. If I look at the lights it shows 4 in on group and 2 in another. If I do a show switch detail it shows the following
Switch/Stack Mac Address : 44ad.d982.a100
                                           H/W   Current
Switch# Role   Mac Address     Priority Version State
1       Member 5006.0425.7e00     1      1       Ready
*2       Master 44ad.d982.a100     1      1       Ready
3       Member 5006.0435.bc00     1      1       Waiting
4       Member 5006.04d8.7000     1      1       Ready
         Stack Port Status             Neighbors
Switch# Port 1     Port 2           Port 1   Port 2
1       Down        Ok              None       2
2        Ok         Ok                4        1
4       Down        Ok              None       2

Hi , i think only four 2960 SF switches can be stacked into a singe logical switch.
Please refer the link , hope this helps:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps6406/white_paper_c11-578928.html

Catalyst 2960 Problem with Cisco SPA512

Hi there,
I hope someone can help me.
I don't have much experience with switches, I'm doing the desktop support in our company.
We have Catalyst 4510 R+E to 2 Catalyst 2960 switches and seperate VLAN's for IP Phones and for Internet in one part of our office.
Now I'm running into trouble with some IP Phones that are connected to the 2960 switches. It appears only to happen with Cisco's SPA-512. I've tried FW 7.5.2, 7.5.5 and 7.5.5b. These phones sporadically drop the call / connection, with the red MIC button blinking. Based on my research this means that it looses Internet connection. I have 1 SPA512 with FW 7.5.1 that does not show these symptoms.
I have other phones SPA942 and Polycom IP335 in the same area behind the same switches and no issues.
We've tried to disable auto negotiate and set a fixed transmition rate or either 1Gbps and 100Mbps, both without success.
I also have SPA512 in other areas of the office just connected to our Catalyst 4510 R+E and they work just fine. That's why I don't believe it has anything to do with the 4510, but I can be wrong.
That's all I have for you guys. Hope someone can help me to fix / troubleshoot this..
Frank

SSwitch3#test cable-diagnostics tdr int g1/0/16
TDR test started on interface Gi1/0/16
A TDR test can take a few seconds to run on an interface
Use 'show cable-diagnostics tdr' to read the TDR results.
SSwitch3#show cable-diagnostics tdr int g1/0/16
TDR test last run on: June 27 13:39:21
Interface Speed Local pair Pair length        Remote pair Pair status
Gi1/0/16 1000M Pair A     52   +/- 10 meters Pair A      Normal
                Pair B     52   +/- 10 meters Pair B      Normal
                Pair C     52   +/- 10 meters Pair C      Normal
                Pair D     52   +/- 10 meters Pair D      Normal
SSwitch3#

Gbic loop on catalyst 2960

Hello,
I would like to know if there is a way to validate that a SFP type 1000baseLX is working properly on catalyst 2960.
I am looking for the loop feature that is available on routers.... but not on switches.
The topology is 2 catalyst 2960 switches with both SFP type 1000baseLX connected together with a fiber. This was working find but actually, the two interfaces are down/down.
The idea is to be sure that the problem is on the fiber and not on one of the SFP....
Thank You for your help.

UniDirectional Link Detection (UDLD) addresses your concern regarding the fiber. See http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2960/software/release/12.2_46_se/configuration/guide/swudld.html for more information.
For the SFPs themselves, you might want to review http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps4999/products_tech_note09186a00807a30d6.shtml for more information.
Hope this helps.

PLZ CAN U TELL ME THE BUGS

plz tell me the bugs which u rectified in u r suport project.
i.e give some examples .

Dear
"EXISTS" keyword give better performance in large number of rows because it do the index search if you
are using join condition then i suggest EXISTS give the better performance.
and while IN keyword is used when sub query output is small
so go for better performance
Regards
Hitesh Nirkhey

Cisco Network Assistant MAC search in Catalyst 2960

Hi,
Since I updated a Catalyst 2960 switch to IOS version 12.2(55)SE1 I can't do searchs by MAC address, when I do "Monitor->Search" the following error appears:
"The software version of the selected switch does not support some of the CLI commands in read-only mode for this window. You must have read-write access to this switch to display complete information in this window"
If packets are captured you can see that the issued command by the CNA host is "GET /exec/show/mac-address-table/", the answer from the switch is:
"show mac-address-table
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
If I do "Configure->Switching->MAC Address" instead I get the mac address-table correctly. In this case the issued command is "GET /exec/show/mac/address-table/dynamic" and no error is displayed, the answer from the switch is the list of mac-address table.

I have some site admins that use CNA. I just upgraded their LAN to 3560v2 switches running 12.2(58)SE2 and had them upgrade their CNA software to CNA 5.7(6). They reported the same error.
I think you clearly indentified the problem. At one time the IOS command parser accepted both "show mac-address" and "show mac address". At some point IOS stopped accepting the older "show mac-address" format, and CNA is still issuing this command regardless of the IOS version it is trying to manage.

Catalyst 2960-x Tel 1 and g49, bug

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for