Catalyst 2960 XR support standar IEEE 802.3i

Hi
The Catalyst 2960 XR support standar IEEE 802.3i?.
becouse the datasheet not is present.
Best regards.

Data Sheet doesnt cover this standard:
tandards
● IEEE 802.1D Spanning Tree Protocol
● IEEE 802.1p CoS Prioritization
● IEEE 802.1Q VLAN
● IEEE 802.1s
● IEEE 802.1w
● IEEE 802.1X
● IEEE 802.1ab (LLDP)
● IEEE 802.3ad
● IEEE 802.3af
● IEEE 802.3ah (100BASE-X single/multimode fiber only)
● IEEE 802.3x full duplex on 10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, and 1000BASE-T ports
● IEEE 802.3 10BASE-T specification
● IEEE 802.3u 100BASE-TX specification
● IEEE 802.3ab 1000BASE-T specification
● IEEE 802.3z 1000BASE-X specification
Could you please open a TAC case so that we check with BU on the same?

Similar Messages

Are switches Catalyst 2960S series supported in LMS 2.6?

Hello,
I have a CiscoWorks LMS 2.6 and i would like to know if the new Switches Catalyst 2960-S Series are supported with this LMS version?
Thanks,
Alejandro

Hi Alejandro,
go through these links give you complete list of supported Switchs with LMS2.6 including features (software Management / Configuration Management / Minimum Software etc.)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/ciscoworks_resource_manager_essentials/4.0.5/device_support/table/RME405.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/ciscoworks_campus_manager/4.0.6/device_support/table/cm406sdt.html

802.1x on Cisco Catalyst 2960

I am trying to enable 802.1x on one of
the switchports of the Cisco Catalyst
2960:
C2960#sh run | i radius
aaa authentication login test group radius local
aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
radius-server host 10.250.97.26 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
radius-server source-ports 1645-1646
radius-server key 123456
C2960#sh run | i dot
aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
dot1x system-auth-control
dot1x guest-vlan supplicant
dot1x critical eapol
C2960#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
C2960(config)#int g0/14
C2960(config-if)#dot1x ?
% Unrecognized command
C2960(config-if)#dot1x
As you can see, I can not enable 802.1x
at the interface level. The code is am running is 12.2.25SEE4:
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image
* 1 24 WS-C2960G-24TC-L 12.2(25)SEE4 C2960-LANBASEK9-M
System image file is "flash:c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-25.SEE4.bin"
According to Cisco, this image supports
802.1x. Why can't enable it at the
interface level?
Can someone help me out? Thanks.

some additional info:
C2960#sh dot1x all
Sysauthcontrol Enabled
Dot1x Protocol Version 2
Critical Recovery Delay 100
Critical EAPOL Enabled
C2960#

NAC modes supported by the Catalyst 2960

Hello, we want to be able to use NAC with agentless hosts. From my reading the NAC-L2-IP and NAC-L3-IP modes are the only modes that support NAH's.
Are these two modes supported by The Catalyst 2960 switch?

This should answer your question:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns628/networking_solutions_package.html
Note: you can find it off of:
cisco.com/go/nac
Hope it helps,
David.

Does Iphone support IEEE 802.3N

Does the IPhone 4 support IEEE 802.3N 5GHz network?

Straight from the iPhone's tech specs website: 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi (802.11n 2.4GHz only)

Catalyst 2960S switch stack support?

I have a customer with a new stack of four Catalyst 2960S switches.
Is this configuration supported by Onplus?
I can't seem to figure out the login access and enable access credentials
so that Onplus can backup the configuration of the stack.
Jeff Bright
Bright Systems
Broken Arrow, OK

I also have a 2960S stack in my office. I checked my handy OnPlus iPhone App and it shows backup, restore, and firmware all equal 1 which I recall correctly means backup is supported. I'll double check when I get into the office to ensure backups are actually working.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Catalyst 2960 POE Consumption

Hi,
I've been advised by a third party vendor to put my catalyst 2960 poe switch into consumption mode. Is that possible with this model?
Thanks,

This is what you can do:
Supported Protocols and Standards
The switch uses these protocols and standards to support PoE:
•CDP with power consumption—The powered device notifies the switch of the amount of power it is consuming. The switch does not reply to the power-consumption messages. The switch can only supply power to or remove power from the PoE port.
•Cisco intelligent power management—The powered device and the switch negotiate through power-negotiation CDP messages for an agreed power-consumption level. The negotiation allows a high-power Cisco powered device, which consumes more than 7 W, to operate at its highest power mode. The powered device first boots up in low-power mode, consumes less than 7 W, and negotiates to obtain enough power to operate in high-power mode. The device changes to high-power mode only when it receives confirmation from the switch.
High-power devices can operate in low-power mode on switches that do not support power-negotiation CDP.
Cisco intelligent power management is backward-compatible with CDP with power consumption; the switch responds according to the CDP message that it receives. CDP is not supported on third-party powered devices; therefore, the switch uses the IEEE classification to determine the power usage of the device.
•IEEE 802.3af—The major features of this standard are powered-device discovery, power administration, disconnect detection, and optional powered-device power classification. For more information, see the standard.
•IEEE 802.3at (Catalyst 2960-S only)—This PoE+ standard supports all the features of 802.1af and increases the maximum power available on each PoE port from 15.4 W to 30 W.
Powered-Device Detection and Initial Power Allocation
The switch detects a Cisco pre-standard or an IEEE-compliant powered device when the PoE-capable port is in the no-shutdown state, PoE is enabled (the default), and the connected device is not being powered by an AC adaptor.
After device detection, the switch determines the device power requirements based on its type:
•A Cisco pre-standard powered device does not provide its power requirement when the switch detects it, so a Catalyst 2960 switch allocates 15.4 W as the initial allocation for power budgeting; a Catalyst 2960-S switch allocates 30 W (PoE+).
The initial power allocation is the maximum amount of power that a powered device requires. The switch initially allocates this amount of power when it detects and powers the powered device. As the switch receives CDP messages from the powered device and as the powered device negotiates power levels with the switch through CDP power-negotiation messages, the initial power allocation might be adjusted.
•The switch classifies the detected IEEE device within a power consumption class. Based on the available power in the power budget, the switch determines if a port can be powered. Table 12-1 lists these levels.
Table 12-1 IEEE Power Classifications
Class
Maximum Power Level Required from the Switch
0 (class status unknown)
15.4 W
1
4 W
2
7 W
3
15.4 W
4
30 W (Catalyst 2960-S only)

IEEE 802.1x port-based authetication

I want to configure IEEE 802.1x port-based authentication on cisco switches, preferable 2960 series. Which models support this feature?. I have try with some older switches but it doesn't works properly on everyone.
I have upgraded them whitout better results, there is namely an issue with TLS handshaking on some switches which produces authentication to fail.

Hi Claudia,
do you mean that the EAP-TLS authentication fails only on some 2960 switches and it works on other 2960s?
What is the IOS version you're using there?
What is the RADIUS server in use?
What is the exact error message you see on the RADIUS side?
Usually, the reason for the EAP-TLS handshake failure is to be troubleshoot on the supplicant and AAA server, however, there may be something on the switch depending on the certificate size and MTU settings on the switch(es).
What is the server cert size and the MTU configured on the switches?
With the info you provided it's difficult to say what's the reason of this failure.
I would suggest to start looking into the above mentioned topics, else you would need to proceed with deeper debugging and sniffer traces, which may be better/easier to handle through a TAC case.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Federico
If this answers your question please mark the question as "answered" and rate it, so other users can easily find it.

Bandwidth monitoring on a Catalyst 2960

Hello all, I'm working with two Catalyst 2960 switches and I would like to know if there is a way to monitor bandwidth on individual ports. Ideally I would like to have one graph showing a bandwidth usage reading on each port. I tried using the Network Assistant to accomplish this, but I was only able to view one port at a time. I also tried using a traffic graphing program from Paessler, but a MIB file is needed to allow the program to connect to the switch. When I ran a search on the network management page the 2960 was not on the list for MIB supported products. Is this type of graph possible to do? Or is there a more effective way to accomplish what I would like to do. Any ideas or suggestions would be helpful.

Hi, we have just swapped all our avaya switches with catalyst 2960 (12, 24 and 48 ports) and 3750 (48 ports with 10gig module).
How do I find what port I should monitor for bandwith graphs?
Target[10.0.0.22_loc1]: 1:@10.0.0.22:

Catalyst 2960 Problem with Cisco SPA512

Hi there,
I hope someone can help me.
I don't have much experience with switches, I'm doing the desktop support in our company.
We have Catalyst 4510 R+E to 2 Catalyst 2960 switches and seperate VLAN's for IP Phones and for Internet in one part of our office.
Now I'm running into trouble with some IP Phones that are connected to the 2960 switches. It appears only to happen with Cisco's SPA-512. I've tried FW 7.5.2, 7.5.5 and 7.5.5b. These phones sporadically drop the call / connection, with the red MIC button blinking. Based on my research this means that it looses Internet connection. I have 1 SPA512 with FW 7.5.1 that does not show these symptoms.
I have other phones SPA942 and Polycom IP335 in the same area behind the same switches and no issues.
We've tried to disable auto negotiate and set a fixed transmition rate or either 1Gbps and 100Mbps, both without success.
I also have SPA512 in other areas of the office just connected to our Catalyst 4510 R+E and they work just fine. That's why I don't believe it has anything to do with the 4510, but I can be wrong.
That's all I have for you guys. Hope someone can help me to fix / troubleshoot this..
Frank

SSwitch3#test cable-diagnostics tdr int g1/0/16
TDR test started on interface Gi1/0/16
A TDR test can take a few seconds to run on an interface
Use 'show cable-diagnostics tdr' to read the TDR results.
SSwitch3#show cable-diagnostics tdr int g1/0/16
TDR test last run on: June 27 13:39:21
Interface Speed Local pair Pair length        Remote pair Pair status
Gi1/0/16 1000M Pair A     52   +/- 10 meters Pair A      Normal
                Pair B     52   +/- 10 meters Pair B      Normal
                Pair C     52   +/- 10 meters Pair C      Normal
                Pair D     52   +/- 10 meters Pair D      Normal
SSwitch3#

National Instruments PXI with IEEE 802.15.4 standard (ZigBee)

Bonjour,
En fait, je travaille sur un projet qui a pour but d’implémenter un émetteur/récepteur Zigbee en bande de base reconfigurable sur la plateforme d'évaluation XUPV5-LX110T qui embarque un Virtex 5. Je suis actuellement dans la phase de test réel.
Premièrement, Je veux envoyer mes données venant d’un pc vers un FPGA et de les recevoir (pour traiter mes signaux sur Matlab). Est-ce-que cette tâche est faisable ou non ? Y a-t-il une solution pour ça en utilisant un média de communication (la liaison série par exemple)
Deuxièmement, Y a-t-il un équipement de mesure et de test de National Instruments à l’aide des PXI qui supporte le protocole sans fil Zigbee ou autrement la norme IEEE 802.15.4 (à savoir RF Vector Signal Generator et Vector Signal Analyzer) de la partie frontale analogique que ce soit en émission ou en réception?
Et merci d’avance pour tout le monde.
Hello,
In fact, I'm working on a project which aims to implement a reconfigurable Zigbee tranceiver on XUPV5-LX110T Evaluation platform which integrates a Virtex 5 FPGA. I am currently in the phase of real test.
First, I want to send my data from a PC to FPGA and receive it (to treat my signals on Matlab). Is this possible or not? If yes, Is there a solution for it using a medium of communication (e.g. serial link)
Second, is there a measuring equipment and testing National Instruments using PXI which supports the Zigbee wireless protocol or otherwise IEEE 802.15.4 standard (i.e. RF Vector Signal Generator and Vector Signal Analyzer) of the analog front-end either in transmission or reception?
And thanks a lot in advance for everyone.

Hello,
I am not sure what data you will be collecting, or how you intend on using the board. Perhaps you can explain your application a little bit more?
Is the FPGA code already developed for your application with the XUPV5-LX110T board? As long as the developed FPGA code is able to communicate with your PC via whatever protocol you choose, then you can use that as a channel to send data back and forth. Since the board is capable of many different I/O connections, you can pretty much sending/receive data over which ever connection you prefer, Ethernet, RS-232, etc.
Just to clear up any confusion, if you do not already have FPGA code for the board, this is not something you would be able to develop with LabVIEW FPGA programming. The XUPV5-LX110T board is not supported for programming its FPGA using LabVIEW FPGA. You can however, program in labVIEW to communicate data back and forth with the I/O you have chosen to connect with to your PC, such as Ethernet or RS-232, as mentioned above.
As far as measuring equipment NI offers for testing with the Zibee (IEEE 802.15.4) wireless protocol in the PXI platform, if your application requires you to both transmit to, and received from the board, and then you would need either both a Vector Signal Generator and Vector Signal Analyzer, or a Vector Signal Transceiver. See the list below for some examples of what we have to offer.
VSAs: NI PXI-5661, NI PXIe-5663E
VSGs: NI PXI-5671, NI PXIe-5672/5673E
VSTs: NI PXIe-5644R/5645R/5646R
From my knowledge of ZigBee, you would be capable of communicating with the board using any of these devices.
Matthew R.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Cisco Network Assistant MAC search in Catalyst 2960

Hi,
Since I updated a Catalyst 2960 switch to IOS version 12.2(55)SE1 I can't do searchs by MAC address, when I do "Monitor->Search" the following error appears:
"The software version of the selected switch does not support some of the CLI commands in read-only mode for this window. You must have read-write access to this switch to display complete information in this window"
If packets are captured you can see that the issued command by the CNA host is "GET /exec/show/mac-address-table/", the answer from the switch is:
"show mac-address-table
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
If I do "Configure->Switching->MAC Address" instead I get the mac address-table correctly. In this case the issued command is "GET /exec/show/mac/address-table/dynamic" and no error is displayed, the answer from the switch is the list of mac-address table.

I have some site admins that use CNA. I just upgraded their LAN to 3560v2 switches running 12.2(58)SE2 and had them upgrade their CNA software to CNA 5.7(6). They reported the same error.
I think you clearly indentified the problem. At one time the IOS command parser accepted both "show mac-address" and "show mac address". At some point IOS stopped accepting the older "show mac-address" format, and CNA is still issuing this command regardless of the IOS version it is trying to manage.

View-only access to Catalyst 2960/2960S device manager

I have noticed that when I access the (Web-based) device manager on a Catalyst 2960 or 2960S switch, the authentication prompt (from within IE, at least) includes the phrase, "The server <switch-hostname> at level_15_or_view_access requires a username and password." This would seem to imply that it's possible to configure view-only (a.k.a. read-only) access to the device manager, which would be perfect for first-level support personnel (in our environment). I reviewed the information on how to configure local authentication for the Web server (leveraging "ip http authentication local" among other commands), but the examples are a bit too broad for me understand how to specifically (and only) allow someone coming in via HTTP(S) to gain read-only access to the device manager. (Command line access should be denied entirely for the view-only user, if possible, or at least limited to commands that can't modify the switch's configuration.) Assuming this is possible, could someone cite the command sequence required?
Thanks,
Mike

Hi,a customer want a user which has view-only rights on his catalyst switches. I created a user whit privilige level 7.If you log into the CLI everything is fine. But by trying to log into the web page the system wants a level 15 user.Is their any possibility to grant the level 7 user "view-only" rights on the Catalyst Device Manager?Thanks.Thanks.
Hi,
Check out the below link for SDM for read only user configuration
http://conft.com/en/US/docs/routers/access/cisco_router_and_security_device_manager/application/notes/SDMcli.pdf
Hope to Help !!
Ganesh.H
Remember to rate the helpful post

Web Authentication Catalyst 2960

Hi,
I am trying to configure fallback Web Authentication on a catalyst 2960 switch. The goal is to authenticate clients via web authentication who are not 802.1x compliant (the 802.1x part is working fine) and allow them restricted access to the network. The problem is that the web authentication seems to fail.
The equipment regarding my question : catalyst 2960 switch (version : 122-37.SE) and a FreeRadius.
Here's what happens :
The authentication window pops up in my browser and the Access-Request is sent to the RADIUS.
The RADIUS in term responds with a Access-Accept. The debugs running on the switch show that all this information arrives correctly at the switch and the Authentication debug outputs a 'status = PASS' and the Authorization debug outputs a 'status = PASS_ADD'. In spite of this the browser on the client outputs a 'Authentication failed' message.
I've read the manual and the Cisco-attribute Value pairs were mentioned : 'priv-lvl=15' and 'proxyacl ...'. Are these mandatory for it to work? Since I'm not configuring any switch login authentication via RADIUS.
Any suggestions ?
Thanx in advance

Yes, they are mandatory.
If priv-lvl=15 is not returned to the switch, the user will see ?Authentication Failed? and the access-list will not be applied. If the source field in the proxyacl statements is not ?any? or there are other syntax errors, the user will see ?Authentication Successful? but the access-list will not be applied and the user will be denied access to the network.
Not sure about the specific FreeRADIUS config, but you need to setup the ?[026\009\001] cisco-av-pair VSA. It would look something like:
priv-lvl=15
proxyacl#10=permit ip any any
Let me know if this gets you squared away,

Can't see Catalyst 2960 48TT

I had to connect a new Catalyst 2960 48TT switch to my Network. Which is connected straight to port two in Catalyst 3750G 48+4. I have three other already connected: 2 x Catalyst 2960 48TT and 1 Catalyst 2960 48TC.
The problem is I can not see the newly connected switch in Cisco Network Assistant. I see the other two switches but not the new one.
I have couple of computers connected to the new switch which are working fine.
I changed the main cables which go from 3750G to the other switches.
The network is working fine, the connected compuetrs have internet...
Can someone please help...?

....Port Settings, on the 3750G(port 2)...
(ALL the ports are set correctly, on all the switches)
Status: enable
Duplex: auto
speed: auto
PortFast: enable when static access
Flow ctrl: off
Auto MDIX: on
VLAN SETTINGS:
Administrative port: 802.1Q Trunk
trunk allowed VLAN:1,2,5,10,15,20.....
Pruning VLAN: 2-1001
Native VLAN: 1

Catalyst 2960 XR support standar IEEE 802.3i

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for