CcBPM Correlation - Conversion Id

Hello,
so far, e.g. before SP12 I used the field "conversionid" in my ccBPM to connect two messages together. My scenario is that I receive data for an IDOC from a web service which I send via the IDOC adapter to R/3 and then I send an ALEAUD back to my ccBPM which answers the SOAP call. I use the S/A Bridge for that. ws -> xi -> idoc -> r/3 -> idoc -> xi -> ws.
I used the conversionid which was the same on the sending the idoc and the receiving of the ALEAUD. Now after SP12 it is empty.
What have other people used to correlate two message other then payload information as the ALEAUD does not have a great payload.
I sure could extend the ALEAUD to send the right fields back but I like that the ccBPM has its own connection fields you could use (At least you can select them in the correlation editor).
Thanks
Stefan

Hi Stefan.,
Which of the following is the conversatino id?
versionMinor="000" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1" wsu:Id="wsuid-main-92ABE13F5C59AB7FE10000000A1551F7">
open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" wsu:Id="wsuid-manifest-5CABE13F5C59AB7FE10000000A1551F7">
- <SAP:Payload xlink:href="cid:[email protected]">
these are the only id's i can see in header apart from message id. so can you please tell me where and how can i get conversation id??
Thank you
Indrasena

Similar Messages

Error In ccBPM : Correlation Error

Hi All,
We are working on a scenario where in the first received structure in ccBPM waits second structure using correlation.
And further we need to merge both of them together using transformation (Message Mapping) inside ccBPM . Interestingly in our case both the messages are choosen from earlier stages of the ccBPM for merging . Now we are facing correlation error saying "correlation is to be activated in the proceeding step" which we have already done . So the ccBPM is still under error .
Please help us on the same .
Here is the approximate representation of ccBPM steps :-
1.) Start--->Receive> Other BPM steps > <1st message to be merged>-><2nd message to be merged>----->Transformation for merging -
> end
The 1st message and the 2nd meesage is what we are merging inside ccBPM .The messagesare from the previous steps of the ccBPM. We are not able to correlate the messages.
Regards
Nishant

u have multiple files, then every file will initiate a BPM instance.
And in turn every BPM instance is waiting for a message ,messages coming are not able to go for exact BPM instance..
FYI , no correlation on the messages.... (i guess)
@but you need to give clear picture of whats happening with all the steps and business requirement before anybody can comment on this.
1) is this issue at co relating the return message or in merging the co related message....

CcBPM Correlation based on filename

I am new to ccBPM. The problem I am trying to solve is we have 2 files written; 1 in XML with an element containing the name of the 2nd file and a 2nd file that is a PDF document. We can get to these files via the File Adapter (NFS). But we must put the files to another site via the File Adapter using FTP; they must arrive at this site, PDF, the XML. Simple...
My thought was to set up a ccBPM Process but I am not clear if I am headed in the right direction.
Any suggestions?
Many thanks,
Rich

Couple of ways you can implement your requirement
1) using CCBPM. You are right ... You can implement Collection Pattern using correlation based on the field name that has pdf file .
Refer SDN for this. You can also refer SAP BASIS software component in ESR where you get this pattern and implementation
2) Without Using CCBPM: This is an another way you create simple file to file for XML. In the mapping area, You can write java FTP logic to move the pdf file from source directory to target directory. There are plenty of free java ftp api are available. You can use that too.
Hope that helps

CcBPM queue blocked related to certain correlations being "busy"

The symptoms of the error is SYSFAIL on queue XBQ0 with StatusText: "Permanent error in BPE inbound processing"
This ccBPM bundles CREMAS idocs with a correlation on RCVPRN. There are 11 different RCVPRN, but the correlation is only working on 5 of those.
In SWIA i have 6 entries with status "ERROR" which are all "logically deleted". But these match with the correlations that are dysfunctional.
Any idea on how I can "reset" these correlations?

Hi Thomas
Please go into SWF_XI_SWPR and find the workitems in error. Then display the work item and click on task in error. Now make sure you are in "Technical work item display" (CtrlshiftF6). Here you can logically delete the step in error.
Now the entries should be gone in SWF_XI_SWPR
Best regards,
Chris

Difference between conversion id and correlation id in bpel

Hi All,
In invoke/receive/pick activity, there are two options. one for conversion id and one from correlation id. I know the purpose of correlation id in these activities. But donot know what is the difference between both.
Are both having same functionality or something overlapping.
Regards,
Sunil

Sunil,
Find an explanation here:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/dev.1111/e10224/bp_correlate.htm#sthref914
Arik

Correlation and ccBPM

Hello,
I'm having a scenario idoc->BPM->file. I will use BPM for bundling several idoc:s (of the same kind) togeter with the correlation object EDIDC-SNDPRN (Sender partner of the control record in the idoc).
Status of the ccBPM
I loop 3 times before I let the "multi-idoc" to be mapped in a transformation-step. But when i view the BPM-log I only get the last idoc passed to the transformation-step? I have noticed that the correlation in the container of each loop does not exist. Why I beleve this is the problem? Could someone confirm this, and does anyone now what I'm doing wrong?
We are on SP14.
Brgds
Karl

Hello,
I'm having three abstract interfaces in the BPM
1. HRTRPR_SINGEL this abstract interface is the receiver step interface (based on a standard idoc HRTRPR.HRTRPR01)
2. HRTRPR_Multi is an abstract interface used for appending HRTRPR_SINGLE into (based on a standard idoc HRTRPR.HRTRPR01), this interface is defined as a multiline container. The append is done in a container operation step.
3. HRTRPR_package is an abstract interface which is used in the transformationstep, this interface is an altered HRTRPR idoc where I have changed the occurance of the tag IDoc from 1:1 to 1 to unbounded.
The transformation step is using HRTRPR_MULTI (as source 1 to ounbounden) and try to mapp to HRTRPR_package.
I have used different correlation objects that I can correlate with, MESTYP and SNDPRN. But I guess I need to have some value from the incomming idoc:s that are the same?
Brgds
Karl

Use ccBPM mainly for correlation between different systems

In his presentation: "Design Patterns for SAP NetWeaver Exchange Infrastructure"
William Li ,from SAP NetWeaverRIG Americas, stats that following:
*Use ccBPM mainly for correlation processing between messages from different systems
Although this practice is well known Ito me , would like to know what stands behind this recommendation (Except for
eSOA BP). is it performance issue, other...
your insights will be most wellcome.

Nimrod Gisis wrote:Hi Nimrod,
ccBPM offers achieving some difficult requirements easily , that means some cases using standard way of integration not possible .it is true that ccBPM scenarios uses one more layer(BPE engine) but it doesn't mean that it is going to give worst performance.
i had done couple of implementations where we used extensively ccBPM to achive complex integration logics, i never felt ccBPM performance point of view any problems, all interfaces working perfectly in production.my view is it is really awesome.
we have to design any interfaces by following best architectural standards in case of ccBPM also same,there is so much negative publicity about ccBPM, but is it not all true.
the thing that intrigues me the most is the reference to different systems .
> if lets say I have to construct a mesage from 20 other messages taken from the same applicative system....
> will that be a "good practice" or an architectural design flop?
>
it is a good practise to use ccBPM in this case and it is offering correlation mechanism to maintain the reaction between messages so that you can easily differentiate and suppress the unwanted messages.
Regards,
Raj

Correlation Error in ccBPM process

I have encountered following Information error in my Integration Process.
( Error: Container element CorrelationId in step Container Operation0 is initialized but is not used)
I suspect that because of this Error , I am not getting the mapping result in BPM process when it executed).
Scenario: ( BPM Collect Pattern via Message Payload)
Receive Step 1 with Message 1 CorreationId activated
Container Element to extract ( target: CorrelationId Operation: Assign and Expression: Message in 1st Receive Step)
Receive Step 2 with Message 2 which Use Correation from above.
Transformation Step ( Combine Message 1 & 2 and produce Message 3)
Send Step ( exit block with Message3)
The Result of Execution is , I get only 1st 2 lines of Message 3 with namespace and rest is empty,
The mapping produces correct result using Mapping test Tool.
This is a new installation ( We are using SAP PI 7.1 EhP1 SP06 )
This scenario must be working from XI3.0,7.0 and older 7.1 versions..
Has anyone experienced this issue in SP06 ? If so, please let me know, how did you solve it..
Regards
PM

Hi PM,
did you try to delete the two receive steps and recreate them from scratch? Also checking - by clicking on other objects in the integration builder and then going back to the object might help to ensure that what you wanted to select (especially the correlation) is really selected as you wanted. From my experience most of these issues are kind of UI / focus / selection problems.
Kind regards,
Markus

CcBPM - can't activate workflow when using expression in Condition editor

Hi,
My workflow (generated by ccBPM) won't be activated when I try to do an IDOC comparison (on DOCNUM), using an index (count), in the ccBPM Condition Editor.
The condition looks like this:
(msgs_receive[count]./HRTRPR01/IDOC/EDI_DC40/DOCNUM = msg_receive./HRTRPR01/IDOC/EDI_DC40/DOCNUM)
There seem to be no errors when activating the Integration Process in the Integration Repository, however when looking into the SXI_CACHE, XI Directory cache, my integration process gets return code '99', even after reactivation.
I get this error:
Syntax error in expression Line1 Ext. IDE63443806B4211DBC393F1DE0ACE61FE
The exception occurred (program: CL_SAI_SWF_RULE
Symbol 'CE/KO' expected at position 1 in expression 'count{XSDSIMPLE::xsd:string;}'
The only interpretation I make out of this is that it doesn't like my index (count) variable.
Can anything be done to fix this?
I use XI 3.0 SP14
Thanks
Olof Trönnberg

Hi,
Return code - 99
1) Export parameter might be wrong.
2) Check Oss Notes 901366 & 708338.
3) 99 occurs when there is a mismatch in the mapping
4) 99 occur if all the active correlations are not used.
5) Try this SXI_CACHE select your business process and
click on activate. change the the return code to 02
and upon activating again.
This will help you :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw31/helpdata/en/c6/893bca449311d1893e0000e8323c4f/content.htm
Regards
Agasthuri Doss

Multiple Correlations PI 7.1

Hello Guys!!!
I wonder if anyone has been there:
Developing the IP 7.1
I am using a BPM with 5 correlations, all in Block, all with local correlation;
It happens that the first correlation is performed using FILE Adapter, a receiver and another sender (with success) to reach the second correlation, the data leave the BPM through a Receiver Adapter FILE however, to return to BPM by a Sender Adapter FILE error occurs in the Receiver in BPM, the correlation, and the call is stuck in the queue XBTO.
ps.: I am not using the content conversion File Adapter
Already checked the data from related fields, are ok, the Integration Builder Directory, too everything is ok
After the error occurs which, taken from the Trace, TCODE SXI_MONITOR.
Best Regards.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="T">CL_XMS_MAIN->DETERMINE_EXT_PID: CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender scheme external = XIParty</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender agency external = http://sap.com/xi/XI</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: receiver</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver scheme external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver agency external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_HTTP_HANDLER-HANDLE_REQUEST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine?type=entry</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS">
<Trace level="1" type="T">CL_XMS_MAIN->DETERMINE_EXT_PID: CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">CL_XMS_MAIN->DETERMINE_INT_PID: SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = PID</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2009-07-27T22:26:12Z CET</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = F9F5CED47507499127BDD8A8779AB878</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0006</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start sender interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface SI_OA_GraficaPRD</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace http://sap.com/POC_BPM_CAVI</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start receiver interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Loop 0000000001</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--no sender or receiver interface definition found</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hence set action to DEL</Trace>
</SAP:Trace>

I am not sure on what you have actually written.
It would be nice if you could just write the entire thing in small paragraphs
Guess you are facing some issue with the BPM.
Suggest you to go through this troubleshooting guide for BPM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/80a22ce8-8e72-2b10-3fba-e9511c6f0b8b
Regards,
Manjusha.

Correlation issue in JMS adapter - SYNC/ASYNC scenario without BPM

Hi,
I am working on a SYNC/ASYNC scenario with JMS adapter without using BPM. My scenario is SOAP<>PI>JMS. I configured the interface as below:
1. SOAP Sender channel
2. JMS Receiver Channel writing to Queue A.
     Module used:      a. RequestOneWayBean
               b. WaitResponseBean
     Correlation Settings:
               a. Set JMS Correlation ID to "XI Message ID"
               b. Store JMS CorrelationID of request (Checked)
               c. Set JMS Property to "JMS Correlation Id"
               d. Value = "XI MEssage ID"
3. JMS Sender channel reading from queue B ( I am exporting the message from queue A and importing into queue B)
     Module used:      a. NotifyResponseBean
     Correlation Settings:
               a. Set XI MEssage Id to "GUID"
               b. Set XI Conversation ID to "Stored JMS COrrelationID of Request"
I can see the cid in the message from queue A. But I observed thhat the header format of the message in Queue A is "MQSTR".
ISSUE:
1. While writing the message to queue A, below adapter log details(part b) concerned me:
     a. Message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6' successfully processed by channel
     b. Could not create acknowledgements for message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6'
I am not sure why I am receiving the message that " could not create acknowledgements"
2. While reading the message from the sender channel,I consistently get the error message as below:
     a. XI message ID corresponding to JMS message with ID 'ID:414d51205341504449442e514d202020c67b954b20005602'
          will be created as a new GUID with value '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'
     b. Error while processing message '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'; detailed error description:
          com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
          found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
Below are the blogs which I have already gone through:
1. JMS Synchronous Scenario without BPM - Correlation Settings and Transactional JMS Session
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/b028f6f6-7da5-2a10-19bd-cf322cf5ae7b
2. Note: 1086303
3. Sync / Async Bridge without BPM
In the note, they mentioned something about header being "MQRFH2". BUt in our case, the header is "MSSTR". Not sure whether it makes any difference.
Please help.
Edited by: GP on Mar 9, 2010 4:24 AM

Hi,
detailed error description:
com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
This error would generally arose when there are multiple messages, got stuck in the outbound queue. Try to stop both the sender and receiver JMS comunication channels and clear both the inbound and outbound queues.
Once all the messages in the queue are cleraed, try posting the message again.
Regards,
Swetha.

Strange bug: Acrobat 9 deletes words upon conversion from Word doc

Situation: converting from MS Word 2007 (SP2) to Acrobat 9 Standard (v 9.2.0) in WinXP.
I've tried this repeatedly. The first word in multiple headings disappear when converted to PDF (they remain in the Word doc, but don't exist in the PDF that was produced from the doc).
Example: "Correlation Analysis" becomes " Analysis". This is happening to the text of every "Heading 2" style heading. All the other headings are unaffected. Does anyone know why this is happening?
This is insidious because we assume that the finished doc matches the original one. So now I have to also proof the Adobe conversion for unexpected deleted words?
In the meatime, I'll return to Adobe 8 to do these conversions.

I see a similar problem being reported in this posting:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/2370280
No resolution there either.
Regarding your suspicion that it may be related to Word, what contradicts that is the fact that the full text of the header appears in the resulting PDF bookmark!! However, the first word of the text is missing from the heading in the PDF (though it remains in the source Word doc).
Also, I am NOT referring to the page header or footer. I'm referring the text heading in the body of the document. In my case, only the "Header 2" styled headings are affected.

Multi mapping and correlation

Hi there
i have an File --> PI --> Idocs Scenario,
the File structure is something like this:
1 xxx yyy 9865
1 zzz www 9834
2 sss ttt 12392
2 rrr eee 45323
Basically they're deliveries with some additional info,
I want to group them like this:
Header info : 1
Positions:
xxx yyy 9865
zzz www 9834
Header info : 2
Positions:
sss ttt 12392
rrr eee 45323
To be mapped to SHIPPL Idoc ( External transportation documents)
So basically i'd assume i have to split all those deliveries into individual message on BPM and then use correlation to build up the documents grouping all the deliveries??, can you guys help me on how to build up this process??, what goes outside or inside the BPM and how can i resolve all the mapping i need to do?
Thank you Very Much
Roberto.

Hi,
I beleive Multimapping will not work without BPM when we have Idoc as a receiver channel.
You can do these steps:
1) create XSLT mapping to group the data based on the key. (1st mapping)
   if your input after FCC conversion is (before xslt)
   <a1></a1>
<a2></a2>
<b1></b1>
   <b2></b2>
Output of xslt should be : (grouping based on some key field or value)
<Group>
    <a1></a1>
    <a2></a2>
</Group>
<Group>
<b1></b1>
   <b2></b2>
</Group>
2) If you look at Idoc the occurence of Idoc field is one. Download the xsd of Idoc and change the occurence to 1 to unbounde. upload xsd as external definition and use it in mapping.
3) now you can create a graphical mapping which will create the Idoc tag for each Group. It will create multiple Idocs in target system
By using above method you can avoid BPM and there is no needd to use Multimapping also.
Thanks
Inder

How to do 2:1 transformation using XSLT in ccBPM?

Hi,
We have the following ccBPM defined:
A A B A/C D E F
Start---R1---T1---S2---T2---S3---T3---S1---END
R1: Receives Synch XML message A via plain HTTP adapter and opens S/A bridge.
T1: Transforms A into message B using XSLT
S2: Sends message B to a legacy system to do a lookup and gets response C
T2: Transforms A and C into D.
S3: Sends D to another legacy system synchronously and gets response E.
T3: Transforms E to the final response format F
S1: Sends F to the original requestor and close the S/A bridge.
We had created an XSLT style sheet which takes into
consideration of multi-mapping message structure (e.g.
ns0:Messages/ns0:Message1/A and Messages/Message2/C...)
For some reason, the integration process always fails at
Step T2. The only error message we got is:
<b>
Incorrect XML format after mapping: Message expected instead of Catalog
</b>
We went thru all the monitoring/trace tool and could not find any more info on the issue.
I'd really appreciate it if someone can explain the required steps
for designing and configuring n:1 XSLT transformation step.
Thanks in advance
-Simon

Hi Duke,
I still couldn't get it to work. I compared my xsl file
with yours and they look similar. I was able to turn on the
DefaultTrace. The trace log indicated the mapping call was
successful. But no output was generated. No error message
either. Supposedly XI combines two input xml messsages into
a single message to feed into the XSLT, is there away to
trace out this single input message?
Also do two input messages need to be correlated?
thanks again for your help
-Simon

Integration Process: Infinite loop without correlation

Hello,
we have an IP which receives IDocs, maps them and makes SOAP-Calls to the destination synchron.
We need no correlation. Mapping is complex an takes some time.
Since this is an mass-interface, we can see the messages buffered for the IP in XBQO$PE_WS...
In order overcome this performance lack we want to process let's say 3 Idocs simultaneously.
According to "How To Configure Inbound Processing in ccBPM" i need to bring the Receive
Step into an infinite loop step, so that there is always an open Receive-Step:
<Begin loop infinite>
   - Receive-IDoc
   - Transformation-Step
   - Send-Step (SOAP)
   - Check Result
   - ErrorMessage if neccessary
<End loop>
But in this case an correlation is obligatory?
How can we implement sim. processing without correlation?
Regards Gunnar.

Gunnar, I don't think, you can yimprove this scenario and enable processing of more idocs simultanously. System processes the messages as fast, as it can.
Once, we had some problems with IDoc processing in BPM - it was slow. So my friend just added some available processes (increased this number in system settings) and it started to work fine. So, I think, there is no improvement possible in BPM, by try some system settings. I'm sorry, I can't tell you, which setting it exactly was, cos' I don't know, but try to ask some BASIS guys.
Peter

CcBPM Correlation - Conversion Id

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for