CCME 4.0 matches number too early!

Hello,
once again I have a problem with my CCME 4.0.
It happens quite frequently that someone from the outside calls a extension within our organisation. But the CCME bagins matching too early, before all digits are received. One or sometimes even two digits are left out.
Example:
Caller dials 12345-234 with 12345 being the main number and 234 being the extension. Now the CCM begins matching at 12345-23 already. The voice rule for incoming calls now cuts all but the last three digits and tries to match that to an extension. But since there is a digit missing, the CCM tries to match "523" instead of "234". And of course the extension "523" does not exist. So the caller gets a "number not assigned".
This is quite annoying! How can I force the CCME to wait until all digits are received from the telephony service provider?
Regards,
Eyad Tayeb.

The requested debug (of a succesful call):
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960443: <009><009>Component = Invoke component
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960444: <009><009><009>Invoke Id = 22962
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960445: <009><009><009>Operation = Diversion Leg2
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960446: <009>Progress Ind i = 0x8183 - Origination address is non-ISDN
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960447: <009>Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '3462211214'
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960448: <009><009>Plan:
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960449: ISDN, Type:National
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960450: <009>Called Party Number i = 0xC1, '9209299'
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960451: <009><009>Plan:ISDN, Type:Subscriber(local)
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960452: 533213: Sep 6 15:27:45.121: ISDN BR0/1/1 EVENT: process_rxstate: ces/callid 1/0x192A calltype 2 HOST_INCOMING_CALL
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960453: 533214: Sep 6 15:27:45.121: ISDN BR0/1/1 EVENT: host_incoming_call: call_id 0x192A, Guid = 50AAF3E5965D bchan 0
10.10.1.251 960462: 533223: Sep 6 15:27:45.125: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: extract_redirect_orig_called_ie: IE type redirecting num none reason 15 cnt 1 plan -1 type 0 pres 1
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960463: 533224: Sep 6 15:27:45.125: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960464: Calling Number=3462211214, Called Number=9209299, Voice-Interface=0x46AA9C28,
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960486: 2: Dial-peer Tag=299
2006-09-06 13:27:36 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960487: 533232: Sep 6 15:27:45.133: //-1/50AAF3E5965D/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
2006-09-06 13:27:37 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960489: 533233: Sep 6 15:27:45.133: //-1/50AAF3E5965D/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
2006-09-06 13:27:37 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960490: Match Rule=DP_MATCH_DEST; Called Number=299
2006-09-06 13:27:37 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960491: 533234: Sep 6 15:27:45.133: //-1/50AAF3E5965D/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
2006-09-06 13:27:37 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960492: Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_DEST
2006-09-06 13:27:37 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960494: Result=SUCCESS(0)
2006-09-06 13:27:37 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960495: List of Matched Outgoing Dial-peer(s):
2006-09-06 13:27:37 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960496: 1: Dial-peer Tag=20003
2006-09-06 13:27:37 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960497: 2: Dial-peer Tag=299
2006-09-06 13:27:37 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960498: 533236: Sep 6 15:27:45.137: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x81
2006-09-06 13:27:37 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960499: <009>Channel ID i = 0x89
2006-09-06 13:27:37 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960500: <009><009>Exclusive, B1
2006-09-06 13:27:37 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960501: 533237: Sep 6 15:27:45.153: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: TX -> ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x81
2006-09-06 13:27:43 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960502: 533238: Sep 6 15:27:51.825: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: TX -> CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x81
2006-09-06 13:27:43 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960503: <009>Channel ID i = 0x89
2006-09-06 13:27:43 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960504: <009><009>Exclusive, B1
2006-09-06 13:27:43 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960505: 533239: Sep 6 15:27:51.929: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: RX <- CONNECT_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0x01
2006-09-06 13:27:43 UTC Local7.Debug 10.10.1.251 960506: 533240: Sep 6 15:27:51.929: ISDN BR0/1/1 EVENT: process_rxstate: ces/callid 1/0x192A calltype 2 HOST_CONNECT
2006-09-06 13:27:44 UTC Local7.Info 10.10.1.251 960507: 533241: Sep 6 15:27:51.933: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/1/1:1 is now connected to 3462211214

Similar Messages

Windows TCP Socket Buffer Hitting Plateau Too Early

Note: This is a repost of a ServerFault Question edited over the course of a few days, originally here: http://serverfault.com/questions/608060/windows-tcp-window-scaling-hitting-plateau-too-early
Scenario: We have a number of Windows clients regularly uploading large files (FTP/SVN/HTTP PUT/SCP) to Linux servers that are ~100-160ms away. We have 1Gbit/s synchronous bandwidth at the office and the servers are either AWS instances or physically hosted
in US DCs.
The initial report was that uploads to a new server instance were much slower than they could be. This bore out in testing and from multiple locations; clients were seeing stable 2-5Mbit/s to the host from their Windows systems.
I broke out iperf
-s on a an AWS instance and then from a Windows client in the office:
iperf
-c 1.2.3.4
[ 5] local 10.169.40.14 port 5001 connected with 1.2.3.4 port 55185
[ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 6.55 MBytes 5.48 Mbits/sec
iperf
-w1M -c 1.2.3.4
[ 4] local 10.169.40.14 port 5001 connected with 1.2.3.4 port 55239
[ 4] 0.0-18.3 sec 196 MBytes 89.6 Mbits/sec
The latter figure can vary significantly on subsequent tests, (Vagaries of AWS) but is usually between 70 and 130Mbit/s which is more than enough for our needs. Wiresharking the session, I can see:
iperf
-c Windows SYN - Window 64kb, Scale 1 - Linux SYN, ACK: Window 14kb, Scale: 9 (*512)
iperf
-c -w1M Windows SYN - Windows 64kb, Scale 1 - Linux SYN, ACK: Window 14kb, Scale: 9
Clearly the link can sustain this high throughput, but I have to explicity set the window size to make any use of it, which most real world applications won't let me do. The TCP handshakes use the same starting points in each case, but the forced one scales
Conversely, from a Linux client on the same network a straight, iperf
-c (using the system default 85kb) gives me:
[ 5] local 10.169.40.14 port 5001 connected with 1.2.3.4 port 33263
[ 5] 0.0-10.8 sec 142 MBytes 110 Mbits/sec
Without any forcing, it scales as expected. This can't be something in the intervening hops or our local switches/routers and seems to affect Windows 7 and 8 clients alike. I've read lots of guides on auto-tuning, but these are typically about disabling scaling
altogether to work around bad terrible home networking kit.
Can anyone tell me what's happening here and give me a way of fixing it? (Preferably something I can stick in to the registry via GPO.)
Notes
The AWS Linux instance in question has the following kernel settings applied in sysctl.conf:
net.core.rmem_max = 16777216
net.core.wmem_max = 16777216
net.core.rmem_default = 1048576
net.core.wmem_default = 1048576
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 1048576 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 1048576 16777216
I've used dd
if=/dev/zero | nc redirecting to /dev/null at
the server end to rule out iperfand
remove any other possible bottlenecks, but the results are much the same. Tests with ncftp(Cygwin,
Native Windows, Linux) scale in much the same way as the above iperf tests on their respective platforms.
First fix attempts.
Enabling CTCP - This makes no difference; window scaling is identical. (If I understand this correctly, this setting increases the rate at which the congestion window is enlarged rather than the maximum size it can reach)
Enabling TCP timestamps. - No change here either.
Nagle's algorithm - That makes sense and at least it means I can probably ignore that particular blips in the graph as any indication of the problem.
pcap files: Zip file available here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/104qdysmk01lnf6/iperf-pcaps-10s-Win%2BLinux-2014-06-30.zip (Anonymised
with bittwiste, extracts to ~150MB as there's one from each OS client for comparison)
Second fix attempts.
I've enabled ctcp and disabled chimney offloading: TCP Global Parameters
Receive-Side Scaling State : enabled
Chimney Offload State : disabled
NetDMA State : enabled
Direct Cache Acess (DCA) : disabled
Receive Window Auto-Tuning Level : normal
Add-On Congestion Control Provider : ctcp
ECN Capability : disabled
RFC 1323 Timestamps : enabled
Initial RTO : 3000
Non Sack Rtt Resiliency : disabled
But sadly, no change in the throughput.
I do have a cause/effect question here, though: The graphs are of the RWIN value set in the server's ACKs to the client. With Windows clients, am I right in thinking that Linux isn't scaling this value beyond that low point because the client's limited CWIN
prevents even that buffer from being filled? Could there be some other reason that Linux is artificially limiting the RWIN?
Note: I've tried turning on ECN for the hell of it; but no change, there.
Third fix attempts.
No change following disabling heuristics and RWIN autotuning. Have updated the Intel network drivers to the latest (12.10.28.0) with software that exposes functioanlity tweaks viadevice manager tabs. The card is an 82579V Chipset on-board NIC - (I'm going to
do some more testing from clients with realtek or other vendors)
Focusing on the NIC for a moment, I've tried the following (Mostly just ruling out unlikely culprits):
Increase receive buffers to 2k from 256 and transmit buffers to 2k from 512 (Both now at maximum) - No change
Disabled all IP/TCP/UDP checksum offloading. - No change.
Disabled Large Send Offload - Nada.
Turned off IPv6, QoS scheduling - Nowt.
Further investigation
Trying to eliminate the Linux server side, I started up a Server 2012R2 instance and repeated the tests using iperf (cygwin
binary) and NTttcp.
With iperf,
I had to explicitly specify -w1m on both sides
before the connection would scale beyond ~5Mbit/s. (Incidentally, I could be checked and the BDP of ~5Mbits at 91ms latency is almost precisely 64kb. Spot the limit...)
The ntttcp binaries showed now such limitation. Using ntttcpr
-m 1,0,1.2.3.5 on the server and ntttcp
-s -m 1,0,1.2.3.5 -t 10 on the client, I can see much better throughput:
Copyright Version 5.28
Network activity progressing...
Thread Time(s) Throughput(KB/s) Avg B / Compl
====== ======= ================ =============
0 9.990 8155.355 65536.000
##### Totals: #####
Bytes(MEG) realtime(s) Avg Frame Size Throughput(MB/s)
================ =========== ============== ================
79.562500 10.001 1442.556 7.955
Throughput(Buffers/s) Cycles/Byte Buffers
===================== =========== =============
127.287 308.256 1273.000
DPCs(count/s) Pkts(num/DPC) Intr(count/s) Pkts(num/intr)
============= ============= =============== ==============
1868.713 0.785 9336.366 0.157
Packets Sent Packets Received Retransmits Errors Avg. CPU %
============ ================ =========== ====== ==========
57833 14664 0 0 9.476
8MB/s puts it up at the levels I was getting with explicitly large windows in iperf.
Oddly, though, 80MB in 1273 buffers = a 64kB buffer again. A further wireshark shows a good, variable RWIN coming back from the server (Scale factor 256) that the client seems to fulfil; so perhaps ntttcp is misreporting the send window.
Further PCAP files have been provided, here:https://www.dropbox.com/s/dtlvy1vi46x75it/iperf%2Bntttcp%2Bftp-pcaps-2014-07-03.zip
Two more iperfs,
both from Windows to the same Linux server as before (1.2.3.4): One with a 128k Socket size and default 64k window (restricts to ~5Mbit/s again) and one with a 1MB send window and default 8kb socket size. (scales higher)
One ntttcp trace
from the same Windows client to a Server 2012R2 EC2 instance (1.2.3.5). here, the throughput scales well. Note: NTttcp does something odd on port 6001 before it opens the test connection. Not sure what's happening there.
One FTP data trace, uploading 20MB of /dev/urandom to
a near identical linux host (1.2.3.6) using Cygwin ncftp.
Again the limit is there. The pattern is much the same using Windows Filezilla.
Changing the iperf buffer
length does make the expected difference to the time sequence graph (much more vertical sections), but the actual throughput is unchanged.
So we have a final question through all of this: Where is this limitation creeping in? If we simply have user-space software not written to take advantage of Long Fat Networks, can anything be done in the OS to improve the situation?

Hi,
Thanks for posting in Microsoft TechNet forums.
I will try to involve someone familiar with this topic to further look at this issue. There might be some time delay. Appreciate your patience.
Thank you for your understanding and support.
Kate Li
TechNet Community Support

Songs ending too early

It seems that since the last update to I Tunes some songs are ending too early (30 to 1:30 too ealry). The get info button does not indicate the songs should end early. When i download the song again, the problem stops.

There could be a number of causes. If the iPod only plays a very short part of the file <10 secs this is usually down to problems with the structure of the file that iTunes can cope with but that causes the iPod to bail out. Re-encoding in iTunes will normally help, ie. re-rip or convert from MP3 to AAC or vice versa. Since all transcoding is lossy you should retain your original file as a backup in the hope that future firmware upgrades will fix this issue. iTunes also has a feature to allow you to exclude parts of a song from being played. Use *Get info* on a song in question and look at the Options tab. There are options here to set a start & stop time and to remember the playback position. Setting any of these will affect what gets played each time the track is selected. Finally, if you're playing songs in random order that are part of continous play albums the exact point at which the track stops may not be quite where you expect it to be.
tt2

Remember Reminders are firing too early

Hello all.
My remember reminders are firing exactly one hour too early. Calendar reminders and alarm clocks are fine but any reminder for a task created in the remember app is one hour premature. This is very annoying. Has anyone else met this and if so how to resolve?
I just updated to 10.2.1.2941 and hoped it would help but it hasn't.
Colm

Hi,
Bumping this one in hopes!
This one is a huge show-stopper as _nobody_ will be happy with the potential for losing the terminal three seconds of their adverts upwards of half the number of times they are played!
Seriously, am I the only one to have noticed this?
G

Folder action kicks in too early

I have a little applescript that is to add all files that are added to a specific folder to an iTunes playlist.
I added the script as a folder action to the folder.
It seems to work fine with single files.
However, when I copy several files (which takes a few seconds), then the script gets started too early, i.e., when only half of the files have been copied over. Consequently, only some of the files get added to the playlist.
In addition, when I copy a large number of files, it doesn't seem to work at all.
Any ideas what's wrong? or what I can do?
(Is this a bug in Mac OS? I read about an issue in 10.5 where folder actions got started before a single files was finished copying, but I haven't seen of any hints about my problem.)
Any kind of help will be highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Gabriel.
PS:
Here is my script, for completeness
Automatically add the files that are dropped on this applescript to
playlist named below.
To adapt it for a different playlist, just change the name below and save as application.
In addition, you can add this script as a folder action
Author: Gabriel Zachmann, Feb 2010
property playListName : "Hoerspiele"
on open theseFiles
addTheFiles(theseFiles)
end open
on adding folder items to this_folder after receiving added_items
addTheFiles(added_items)
end adding folder items to
to addTheFiles(theFiles)
tell application id "com.apple.iTunes"
activate
set playL to some playlist whose name is playListName
set playID to persistent ID of playL
--display dialog ("persistent ID = " & playID) buttons {"OK"} default button 1
reveal (some playlist whose persistent ID is playID)
repeat with aFile in theFiles
try
add aFile to some playlist whose persistent ID is playID
end try
-- set new date, so we know later when we copied the files
set the file_path to the quoted form of the POSIX path of aFile
do shell script ("/bin/touch " & file_path)
end repeat
end tell
end addTheFiles
Message was edited by: GabrielZ

folder actions have always been buggy and this has always been an issue when folder actions have to process many files at the same time. it's supposed to have gotten better in snow leopard but it's still very far from being reliable. you can try the following trick to slow down your folder action and make it wait to process individual items before they are all copied. that might (or might not ) help
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=8277780#8277780

CK24 - "Release too early" message in log

Hi, All:
I am trying to perform a mark and release for period 1 in 2009 today Dec 16. The cost estimate was done without error. Marking was allowed in CK24 as well as Release. I checked the costing 2 tab and my estimate was there as the future standard cost. Everything seems OK.
However when I check the log, it has this message:
Message number 157 - Company code then "Release too early".
Will this cause problem to my release on Jan 1, 2009.
Thanks in advance for your help!
Peter

Thanks for your quick response, Suraj and Mangalraj!
I am new to SAP and no one in the company knows the exact detail on how to perform the annual cost update. Hence I am asking for help here. I am doing a test on one item right now. I tried before this test to use CK40N to perform a cost run. It gave me incorrect costings. We looked into details and discovered that CK40N is for items with quantity structure. Because all our products are without quantity (purchase items), the system did the calculation incorrectly.
I think I need to clarify a bit more about my test. We have purchase items only hence I used KKPAN - Create cost estimate without quantity structure to enter the costs in directly. There are 3 cost elements, the purchase price, the freight and inspection overhead. The cost estimate should be done by SAP right away after the data is entered. After the data entry, I perform the CK24 to mark the item. Then I use CK24 again to release. Then I checked and saw that message.
Based on Suraju2019s comment, does that means that I have to release the costs on Jan 1, 2009 for my new standard costs to be effective? I found that to be very ineffective. Why canu2019t SAP allow me to plan ahead? I have already performed all my analysis on all the costs. I am sure they are correct. Why do I still need to perform the release on the first date of the actual period?
With regard to Mangalraju2019s comment, I can understand that if the structure is based on some future date, the system should not allow the release because there may be errors when the actual costing run is performed. However since I am not using costing run as explained above, this is not relevant to my situation.
One thing I want comments on is whether this message will stop my planned costs to become standard costs on Jan 1, 2009? This message is not an error, not even a warning. What will happen if I disregard this message? Will I have problem on Jan 1 with the system having outdated standard costs that I have been using for 2008? Please advise.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Peter

TestStand Deployment Issue - VI too early to convert

I have a test system which has LabVIEW 8.0 and TestStand 3.5 running VIs and sequences developed on this system. I am trying to replace this with a deployment system and not having much success. I admit I'm pretty green with LV8 and TS3.5, but reasonably computer savvy.
I purchased the same DAQ boards used in the existing system and installed them in a new PC. The PCs are different types, the existing system is a HP Pavilion and the deployment system is a Dell. I didn't think hat would have much effect.
I created a deployment install image on the development system. I tried this a few months ago and was able to get a simple test deployment working. Now that I've got the actual DAQ hardware, I attempted to deploy the full test system. It installed OK on the deployment system, but when I run a sequence, I get a message that states:
LABVIEW: VI version is too early to convert to the current LABVIEW version.
The notable differences between the two systems include:
1. Different PC types
2. Possibly a different DAQmx version - I installed DAQmx from the CDs that came with the new hardware, not from the original CDs.
3. XP Pro instead of XP Std
Any suggestions? Like I said, I don't have a lot of experience with this, so any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Blair

Thanks, Rick. I tried checking Daqmx 8.0 as one of the drivers to load with the build and got an error. The error indicated that the driver couldn't be loaded as Measurement Studio wasn't installed.
I'll have to see if I can find the original drivers that were used with the old system and remove the drivers from the new system and install the old drivers. I suppose I could try installing the new drivers on the old system and then doing the build, but I hesitate to do that as I am afraid that something will get broken on the old system and shut down production. I've already had one issue during start-up that caused the license to invalidate and had to re-install the license, so I would rather not make any changes at this time.
Unfortunately, a subcontractor created the original system, and I don't know if I have the original driver disks.
The driver disks that came with the new DAQ boards show ver 8.6.
The version number of Measurement and Automation Explorer is the same.
Blair

Wrong Caller-ID displayed - only rightmost 4 digits used for matching number - name

Hi,
Some days ago I discovered a rather strange and very confusing behavior on my Z10 wrt matching calling number to stored contact (name):
When you get a call there should be a "reverse lookup" in the phonebook matching number to name. As it seems the match number to name is solely done based on the rightmost 4 digits. This can lead to very confusing situations to say the least:
Say you have the number +43123456789 stored belonging to "Smith". Now when you get a call another number, say +432838126789 the Z10 displays the calling party as "Smith" - which is defintely wrong.
The same holds true when placing outbound calls: Again, take the contact Smith having +43123456789. Suppose on Z10s dialpad you enter a number, say +43228376789 (righmost 4 digits are the same). When you finish the call in your last call log the Z10 displays the number called as "Smith" - which is completely wrong.
So here are my questions:
Anybody else seen this behavior
Any known cure against it?
BTW - this is happens not only on my Z10 but on every Z10 that is used in our company.
Thanks much in advance for any clue,
-bblacksheep
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Test the recommedationa and see if it works.
Remove the country code from the number you're dialing and see if it fixes it.
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Material Cost Estimate - Release too early

Hi,
I ran the cost estimate for one material on 12.06.2008 and i released the cost estimate. Here it is saying 'Cost Estimate released too early'. I thought system is releasing the cost for material for the next month. but i want to update the material cost for this month only.
And how many days before you have to run the cost estimate for the new month.
sateesh

Hi Sateesh,
Please check the period which you have mentioned in CK24.
I think the period you have given is of next month. Hence system is giving that message as next month's period may not have been opened.
System allows to release cost estimate only once in a period. Normal practice is to carry out cost run at the end of the month.
Please do let me know if your problem is solved.
regards,
makrand

Chapter Markers End Jump Too Early-Problem

Folks, I am using DVDSP 4 and my chapter markers keep stopping too early from the burned DVD. When I play the Video_TS folder using Apple DVD player all is well. When I burn it and play it on a standard DVD player, all the chapter markers end jump earlier than they should - cutting off my full credit rolls on my video track.
All of my chapter markers came from Final Cut Pro where I initially made them.
Please advise.

Make sure you test this on more than one player if it is a "for real" project of replication or duplication. All players are not created equal and there are the real weird things that may show up on only one or two players, but you need to make sure. You may want to try the other methods and see if it helps on the problem player just for fun. (Yeah, I know does not sound like much fun, but it is sort of interesting I guess )

Outlook displays date of birthdays one day too early in MS Office 2007, 2010 and 2013

Hi
We are supporting several clients that has issues with Outlook. Different versions of Windows, Office and different exchange server versions. Some contacts' birthdays
just "magically" changes to one day too early. I have done extensive research with no answer. I have experienced this issue personally as early as about 2005 or 2006 with a Windows Mobile PDA.
Our local time is GMT +2 without daylight-savings. I have checked the settings in Windows (Vista Pro and Win 7 pro
x86 and x64) and the calendar settings, I have reloaded a couple of pc's, created new profiles, installed new server hardware with newer exchange. Even tried a few off-the-wall ideas like resetting all views to default.
Some users' address books are shared, some not. Some uses Apple, Android, BB or Windows phone, some don't. Some connects through VPN, some don't. Some uses
AVG, Avast, Eset Nod, Forticlient, Mcafee, etc....
I have been fighting this problem for months, and can find no conclusive answer that resolves this.
If I manually open the contact and rectify the date, it will stay correct for a very random time period and then shift
again.
I am about to lose a couple of my biggest clients, and probably my job as well, so I need urgent help.
Please no remarks on OS version, Office version or mobile devices, as this is definitely not the issue.
HELP!

Hi,
Have the users check on OWA, does the issue persist? Please also make sure the timezone of Exchange is also properly configured.
I'm not an expert about Exchange, I hope this blog can be helpful:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/fun_with_powershell/archive/2013/04/30/where-is-the-time-zone-property-stored-in-exchange-2010.aspx
To further dig the problem, rectify the date on owa and drop Outlook for a while(or one day), check the result the next day if the problem will come back.
Regards,
Melon Chen
TechNet Community Support

Recording starting too early and also ending too e...

Another problem.....
When recording programmes I am frequently finding that the recording is starting way too early...5-10 minutes....and often ends too early (very annoying as one misses the end of a particular programme).
Any help, gratefully received!
Thanks

Recording should start 2 minutes before the scheduled start time and end 5 minutes after the scheduled stop time (by default - you can increase this).
The box won't automatically cope with programmes which start late. Are the programmes you're having a problem with starting on time?
Is the time displayed on the box correct?

Is it too early to start with JavaFX Mobile Development ?

There are no developer compnents except "TextBox"
The only samples i can see are "showing Photos in grid like structure & similar kinds of app" :(
it doesn't even support Swing
What developer wants "Data Entry Form" which user will submit data to Server Or Store data To Database & then Process the Data & return Result to user, Etc & much more req
why javaFx is more Media Oriented( Audio, Video,Graphics,Animation,Games,etc)
What benifits it provides to Developer.I am basically targetting JavaFX Mobile
Please Reply to help me understand What Can I do In JavaFx mobile domain
Thanks & Regards,
Pravin

Hello, and Welcome to the HP Support Community! As with any Internet Forum, you have to realize that you are visiting a "hospital" - most folks here are the minority who have had problems. If one was to judge the human race by visiting a hospital, you might run outside screaming "WE'RE ALL DOOMED! EVERYONE HERE IS SICK!!!" Those who have no issues at all do not come here and check in. The few that actually do come by and offer compliments are far and few between, and they are greatly appreciated by us! I've asked HP about Win10. They will not provide an answer until the final release is out. It could run with zero issues, or not! The Sprout is an amazing device - a large touchscreen All In One computer with some cool options not many other PC's could ever do! Is it too early? I've had one for almost a year (a loaner from HP for my participation here). Glitches? A few that were easily remedied. The decision is up to you. If worried about Win10, then wait a month or two. The device runs fine on Win 8.1. Why change to Win10? WyreNut

Safari gives up loading images too early

Hi
I have noticed that Safari (currently I am using 3.1.1 but I had noticed this behavior on earlier versions as well) usually gives up on loading images too early.
I have a 30Mbps internet connection and also in Firefox and Opera I do not experience the same problem.
Is this a known issue? Are there currently any workarounds around this problem?
Regards,
Behrang

From your Safari menu bar click Safari > Preferences then select the Privacy tab.
Click: Remove All Website Data
Then delete the cache.
Open a Finder window. From the Finder menu bar click Go > Go to Folder
Type or copy paste the following
~/Library/Caches/com.apple.Safari/Cache.db
Click Go then move the Cache.db file to the Trash.
Quit and relaunch Safari to test.
If nothing above helped, troubleshoot Safari extensions.
From the Safari menu bar click Safari > Preferences then select the Extensions tab. Turn that OFF, quit and relaunch Safari to test.
If that helped, turn one extension on then quit and relaunch Safari to test until you find the incompatible extension then click uninstall.

Preflight droplet process returns too early – before it's done

I'm calling an Acrobat preflight DROPLET from program that I'm writing, and I need to know when the files are ready, that is when the preflight fixups are done.
I need to know this in order to go on with some other file system stuff in my program, that needs to be done after the preflight fixups.
I guess the droplet just tells Acrobat what to do, and then exits. The Droplet process stays up for a while but exits before the work is done.
There is an question from 2009 asking the exact same thing, but no answer. Preflight droplet returns too early
Since it's in a locked section of the forum I venture to ask the same question now, six years later.
Checking the modified dates of all files does not seem to work since a preflight obviously does not alter files that are not in need of being altered.
I'm on windows, and I don't know whether this is a platform dependent problem.
What should I do?
Thanks,
Andreas

This is not a good way to do it. But this is the way I do it now...
It seems to work but there is no guarantee that it will work in the future, or even on all machines.
private static int WaitForAcrobatReady() {
// Get the current Acrobat instance.
var app = new Acrobat.AcroApp();
// While a preflight (droplet) is running, app.GetNumAVDocs() will
// not return ANYTHING, it will just hang.
return app.GetNumAVDocs();
To sum up the efforts of the last weeks: Acrobat doesn't seem to be made for inclusion in other automation jobs. This is just another thing that doesn't work.
(I had to use the C# library PDFSharp to do other things that Acrobat can do really well only that it's not possible to set those properties, or start that kind of actions, from "outside".)

CCME 4.0 matches number too early!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for