"Cells too small to split". As per usual.

Every year or so, while experimenting with XML, I am suddenly reminded of why I never use tables and XML together. Unless you have XML that explicitly specifies the formatting (column width and so on, using attributes of a specially dedicated namespace), when importing XML into a table you are likely to run into the mystifying error message "Cells too small to split".
Every now and again, someone asks the question "Huh?" and no one seems to answer. I thought I'd ask it one more time in case someone has learned what this is all about during the past year.
Anyone stumbled on a solution? Anyone with a solution care to share it with me?
Thanks -- Jeremy

I have the exact same message here. What in my case the issue seems to be is that I have a linked XML file that I update. This works great until I add a new table to the original XML file. Then my update gives the "Cells too small to split" error, and it will not update.
Creating a new document and importing the XML from scratch does work. For us not the ideal way to work, since I now mannualy have to do a "override styles" on each table again.
I have reset my table-styles to a style with an embedded body-cellstyle with 0 inset. I would have no clue as to how to set a minumum row-height and width in a cell or table style though.
Would be great if anyone has found a solution in the meantime.

Similar Messages

"Cells too small to split" importing XML

My hubris in presuming to advise other people about importing XML last week has been punished, it seems.
I am trying to populate a table with data from an XML document. The XML has the following structure:
order
basket
   quantity.../quantity
   title.../title
   price.../price
   quantity.../quantity
   title.../title
   price.../price
/basket
/order
(Actually there's more to it, but that will give you the idea.) I've created a placeholder table with a single row, tagged the table 'basket' and tagged each cell with one of the element names. The containing frame is tagged 'order'.
If there is only a single item (quantity, title, price triple) in the basket, it works a treat. If there's more than one, though, I get the bewildering error message "Cells too small to split". They aren't: I can split the row horizontally by hand, and then import two items.
I'm using CS3, but the same thing happened when I tried in the CS4 demo. I did Google for the error message and found one other person asking for help with a similar problem but he didn't get any replies.
Has anyone seen this message or got any clues to offer?

I have the exact same message here. What in my case the issue seems to be is that I have a linked XML file that I update. This works great until I add a new table to the original XML file. Then my update gives the "Cells too small to split" error, and it will not update.
Creating a new document and importing the XML from scratch does work. For us not the ideal way to work, since I now mannualy have to do a "override styles" on each table again.
I have reset my table-styles to a style with an embedded body-cellstyle with 0 inset. I would have no clue as to how to set a minumum row-height and width in a cell or table style though.
Would be great if anyone has found a solution in the meantime.

I can't delete partition in disk utility, it keeps telling me that "the changes are too small"

I previously split my disk into two different disks, however I want to combine them together again, yet i was unable to delete the second partition. I can't delete partition in disk utility, it keeps telling me that "the changes are too small"
Plz help!!!!!!

Make at least two complete backups of all your data. Boot from another drive and partition this one as desired. Restore the data.

Too Small on Webpage

I am totally new to all of this, so I need some assistance.
I've made a quick table, and I was reading on a site that it
was a recommended 700x400 pixels for size.
But that looks way too small on a webpage. I have it set to
100%.
Any tips for me?

I realy cannot imagine what you are describing without seeing
the page.
Are you referring to a layout you have sliced in FW and
brought into DW?
Taking a Fireworks comp to a CSS-based layout in Dreamweaver
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/fireworks/articles/web_standards_layouts_pt1.html
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"TheBigBad2Million" <[email protected]>
wrote in message
news:***9o9$jfk$[email protected]..
>I notice when I make a side bar that I may want links
listed on..I can only
> click on the middle and type there, but there must be
some kind of way to
> do it.
>
> Also, how do I remove the walls between cells without
merging them?
>
> And one more...
>
> How do I remove the spacing outside of my banner? I just
want the cell to
> perfectly fit it instead of leaving empty space around
it.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>

Too Small CD Stuck in Disc Drive!

I have a small CD disk in the slot for the optical disc drive. Probably too small, and it is non-conventional shape, straight-sided. Computer does not recognize that the disc is there, and none of the usual techniques to eject work. Is this now a mechanical repair job?
I have a MacBook Pro, 2.2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, running 10.5.5.
Armando

I strongly recommend that you take the computer to an Apple repair shop. Depending on how far you've managed to get the disc inserted (and stuck) you may not have done any damage to the drive. However, given the nature of the slot loading drive, an amateur's attempts to dislodge it by mucking about with various instruments could result in a hefty repair fee.

Format Error : mkfs.ocfs2 1.2.7 file system too small for a journal

Hi All,
I am trying to implement Oracle 10g RAC on my laptop using vmware and openfiler software . But while executing the command
#mkfs.ocfs2 -b 4K -C 32K -N 4 -L oracrsfiles /dev/iscsi/crs11/part1
I am getting the error
Format Error : mkfs.ocfs2 1.2.7 file system too small for a journal
Please anybody can help me to resolve this problem.
Thanks in Advance.

How large is the device that you are formatting?
The default journal size depends on the type specified. If none specified,
then it assumes "mail" which sets the default journal per slot to 256M.
If database type, default is 64M.
Use "-T database" to specify database type, etc.
BTW, one can always override the defaults. Say "-J size=16M" to make
a smaller journal.
man mkfs.ocfs2 and the user's guide has more.

Oracle Report Error (string buffer too small) in Portal

Hi,
I have registered an oracle report (.rdf) with portal which works fine outside in Reports Builder, but when I try to run it in Portal it keeps throwing this error:
SQL-6502: ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small
ORA-06512: at "PORTAL.WWV_RW_USR", line 444
ORA-06512: at "PORTAL.WWV_RW_USR", line 923
ORA-06512: at line 1
Anyone know what needs to be done to fix this?
Thanks

Sean:
Thank you very much for wading through my post.
>"if (NIerror = DAQmxCfgInputBuffer(h, numSamples*4))"
>I would leave this line out. DAQmx should create an input buffer automatically
>based on the number of channels and number of samples per channel.
Yeah- I put that in trying to fix the problem. The error message doesn't say *which* buffer is too small
>If you just call the DAQmxReadDigitalLines() function with "numSampsPerChan" set to -1,
>DAQmx will wait until all samples are acquired before performing the read.
I'm trying to avoid the wait. That's why I'm trying to figure out how many samples are ready.
I suppose I can try numSampsPerChan=-1, set a short timeout and check for the timeout error.
>If this does not help, please send me a small section of code that reproduces that behavior,
>and I will try running it on my machine.
I will try modifying one of the examples to do what I'm trying to do.
Again, Thank you!
John Weeks
WaveMetrics, Inc.
Phone (503) 620-3001
Fax (503) 620-6754
www.wavemetrics.com

How can I get text printed out larger? It prints too small to read.

I have an hp psc 1610 all-in-one printer. When I print articles from the internet the text is too small. The options to change size only seem to affect the screen size, not the printer size. It prints fine in my word processor, etc.

File > Page Setup > '''Scale''' <br />
100% or Shrink to Fit is usually the best.
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Problems_printing_web_pages

WWV_FLOW_WORKSHEET_CONDITIONS - ORA-06502 character string buffer too small

Hi,
I am currently working on a application that can upload CSV files inside many tables. Since I hate reinventing the wheels, I have decided to reverse engineer APEX and APEX APIs that are used by the SQL Workshop to upload CSV files to a single table. Since this feature was tested many times by many developers around the world, I know I can trust the code. If in a future release of APEX those packages are modified, I'll have to update my abstraction layer to call my own packages instead of APEX packages. (This is not an issue for our team.)
First Step
Use apex_040000.wwv_flow_load_data.create_csv_collection to create an apex collection with the first 20 rows of the csv file. At this step, we can validate the format of a sample of the file without loading all rows of the csv file.
Second Step
Use apex_040000.wwv_flow_load_data.load_csv_data to upload all rows of the csv file inside a table.
Third Step
Do whatever you want with the data inside the table. (i.e.: Send the data into multiple tables...)
Here's my problem..._
After the first or second steps, I display the data using interactive reports. I want to highlight every cells containing "invalid" data. I use apex_040000.wwv_flow_worksheet_api.add_or_update_highlight. When I have too many invalid cells, the IR doesn't show at run time, and you can see ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small on the page.
I would like to know the limitations of IR using the table WWV_FLOW_WORKSHEET_CONDITIONS. Is there a way to create many highlight conditions inside a single row of WWV_FLOW_WORKSHEET_CONDITIONS ? I want to find the best approach to add hundreds of conditions.
Thanks
Louis-Guillaume Carrier-Bédard
My Google+: https://profiles.google.com/lgcarrier
My Blog: http://www.lgcarrier.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/lgcarrier
APEX Québec: http://www.apexquebec.com
APEXFramework: http://www.apexframework.com

At run time, when I look at the html source code, I can see all the generated CSS rules to highlight the cells of the IR.
ie.: *.apexir_WORKSHEET_DATA tr td.rule_5352115461902443_td {background-color:#FF0000 !important;}*

Thunderbolt - everything too small to read at high res

I want to use my Thunderbolt at full resolution but everything is just too small to read without eventually getting a headache ! I bought a large screen to make reduce the strain.
Is there a way around this?

There is a fix!
I have a 30 inch monitor running at 2560 x 1600 with my Mac Mini and the outrageous $99 adapter from Apple. (Found it new for $60 on eBay.)
My menu bars and Google Chrome's tabs and bookmark bar were both way too small - like 4 point!
TinkerToolSystem, (not TinkerTool) allows you to go into hidden preferences and re-set to "HiDPI." Afer making the adjustment which doubled my DPI, I had to choose half the resolution 1280 x 800, but with no loss of real resolution! Things did get bigger elsewhere but I was able to adjust most of them. Hooray! GL!
Download the Evaluation copy of TinkerToolSystem. You get to open it 5 times for free.
http://www.bresink.com/osx/300321023/Docs-en/pgs/System.html
About halfway down, under "Screen."
For Snow Leopard
By default, Mac OS X assumes that the display screen is rendering graphics with a resolution of 72 pixels per inch. This policy was taken over from the classic Mac OS. While this basic assumption was true when the Macintosh was introduced more than 20 years ago, today's display devices often have a much higher resolution. The pixels have become smaller, so your screen may actually use e.g. 100 pixels per inch. In practice, this means that graphical elements, for example fonts, will be displayed too small, so a 12 point font selected in an application might no longer match the actual size of a 12 point font printed in a book when you compare screen and book side by side.
To accommodate these changes, Mac OS X is capable of using arbitrary display resolutions. TinkerTool System allows you to change the resolution between 36 and 216 pixels per inch. If the screen display stays the same, the screen contents will be displayed larger when you set a higher resolution, and smaller when you set a lower resolution.
For Lion and Mt.Lion
Apple has removed the feature from the operating system that allowed to control the physical resolution of screen output by an infinitely variable factor. As of 10.7 or later, this function was replaced by the feature HiDPI (High Number of Dots per Inch) which allows to double the physical resolution only. This means you can select between the discrete values 72 ppi and 144 ppi (or 288, 578, … ppi in the far future). Other magnification steps or scaling down are no longer available. The HiDPI strategy allow OS X to be used on ultra-high-resolution screens (“retina displays”).
Enabling the HiDPI feature requires two steps. The first step is to unlock HiDPI mode via TinkerTool System. The second step is to select one of the HiDPI display resolutions on the pane Displays ofSystem Preferences. Perform the following steps to work with HiDPI display modes:
Select the item Screen in the pane System.
Switch between the two possible modes Hide HiDPI resolutions and Display HiDPI resolutions.
Log out to let the change take effect.
When you log in again, you can launch System Preferences, go to Displays and choose one of the HiDPI settings shown in the table Display > Resolutions.
WARNING: The display resolution is a very critical setting. If you set the resolution too high, the windows can become so large that they no longer fit on screen. This means you can no longer see or control all parts of some applications which can make your system unusable!
To use the system with 144 ppi, a screen with at least 2048 x 1536 pixels is strongly recommended, because OS X applications are designed by the rule that they can expect windows to have a minimum size of 1024 x 768 pixels at 72 ppi.
The Retina Displays may lead to a software update and then we will all be happy.

100% zoom is too small on screen

Hello, I'm using photoshop CC on amacbook pro retina. I mainly use photoshop for web design and when I open a document that is 300x200 px, the 100% view is too small on screen. Any ideas, It was this way on PS cs6 also before I upgraded. I just tried to delete the prefs file and restarted PS and it did not change. I have also tried to change my screen resolution to "best for retina" and it is still the same.
Steve

I'm sorry, I don't mean to be condescending. But the problem is you've paid extra for something that's actually an improvement, but now you don't want it to work any differently than what you had before.
You don't appear to understand how images and displays actually work. I'll try to provide an explanation...
Images are made out of pixels. Little squares of one and only one color each that when stacked in rows and columns together make up what we call an image.
Your display has the ability to display little lighted squares of one and only one color each (it's really a bit more complicated than this, but I'm trying to keep it simple). Stacked in rows and columns these tiny display sites make up your display screen. Before the Retina display, every square inch had roughly 100 x 100 of these display sites. Now (assuming a 15" Macbook Retina display) you have 220 x 220 of them in every square inch.
In order to fit so many more in a square inch they have to be much smaller. With me so far? Each tiny display site is 1/220 of an inch on a side, by definition.
When Photoshop displays an image, it sizes it per your guidance - you set the Zoom factor.
100% zoom - by definition - means that one pixel from an image will occupy one display site on the screen.
Can you now see how, since the display sites are much smaller on a Mac retina display, an image displayed at 100% will appear smaller?
Now here's where some additional magic comes in: The folks who programmed your operating system and browser realized that you would probably not like to see everything less than half the size it was, so they automatically use 200% (or more) zoom behind the scenes so that the pictures and stuff on web pages and application controls are displayed nice and big. This happens with older non-retina applications automatically as well - it's called pixel doubling.
To directly answer your question:
Set an appropriate zoom level in Photoshop to make the image as large as you'd like to see it and you will be fine.
It may help you to feel better to think, when you see the sharp edges of the pixels at zoomed-in sizes, that you have a display that's got such high resolution and is so accurate that you can see the edges of the actual pixels, while all the folks who don't have Retina displays are just seeing them blurred together.
-Noel

[SOLVED] Java Font Too Small in OpenBox

I usually use Cinnamon, but decided to give OpenBox a whirl again. I am encountering a problem with OpenBox and the size of fonts in Java apps. I'm using the Oracle JDK, not OpenJDK.
These first screenshots show the font on OpenBox being too small:
http://www.dadburn.com/linuxscreenshots … tprob1.png
http://www.dadburn.com/linuxscreenshots … tprob2.png
As you can see, the fonts used for the controls is super tiny. As can be seen from the second example, the font can be configured in the editing portion through the applications. But the controls themselves remain too small.
When I log into the SAME account, but use Cinnamon, the fonts are fine. Reference:
http://www.dadburn.com/linuxscreenshots … tprob3.png
http://www.dadburn.com/linuxscreenshots … tprob4.png
So the only difference in these screenshots are the fonts. And the only difference is that I am using Cinnamon vs OpenBox. I;ve searched Google and the Wiki and the Forums, but I'm either not using the proper search terms or just overlooking the results. Can anyone point me in the right direction.
Also, I am using the fontconfig-infinality stuff. I don't think that matters and again, Cinnamon works and OpenBox has too small a font. And the problem is only on Java apps, not other things.
Thanks in advance.
Last edited by mrunion (2014-08-10 03:10:58)

I've done more digging. I have this in my /etc/profile:
export _JAVA_OPTIONS='-Dswing.systemlaf=com.sun.java.swing.plaf.gtk.GTKLookAndFeel -Dswing.defaultlaf=com.sun.java.swing.plaf.gtk.GTKLookAndFeel -Dswing.aatext=true -Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=on'
Well, this screws up gdx-setup (the first screenshot). If I only use
export _JAVA_OPTIONS='-Dswing.aatext=true -Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=on'
Then gdx-setup looks fine. Netbeans was still messed up either way. I did find that it seems Netbeans has issues with the GTK+ look and feel on non-GTK platforms. So I reverted NetBeans to the (ugly) Metal theme and now the fonts are bigger.
So I am marking this as solved. It seems that the GTK+ look and feel is just not happy on non-GTK+ platforms. I guess that makes sense in a way.

Backup disc too small?

I recently purchased a new MacBook Pro and used a Time Machine backup to transfer all the files from my old MacBook Pro to the new one. Now, I am trying to set up Time Machine on the new laptop with the same external hard drive I was using a Time Machine backup disc with my old computer. The backup fails and tells me the backup disc is too small.
Now, the backup disc has 58.43 GB available out of 499.97. The data on my internal harddrive is 141 GB, with about 607 GB free.
So, yes, 141 is more than 58. But why doesn't it just overwrite the old data? It is supposed to delete the oldest backup and replace it with the newest one, right?
Do I need to reformat the backup disc? Do I need a backup disc that's larger than my internal HD even if I'm not using all that space?

sarahbuck wrote:
I recently purchased a new MacBook Pro and used a Time Machine backup to transfer all the files from my old MacBook Pro to the new one.
If you used Setup Assistant or Migration Assistant to do that, when the first backup started, you should have gotten the prompt in #B5 of Time Machine - Troubleshooting. If you selected "Reuse Backup," Time Machine shouldn't be doing a full backup.
If you used some other method, you won't get that message, and TM wants to do a full backup. But since it won't ever delete your last remaining backup, there isn't enough room.
Your best bet is to erase the TM drive and start over.
Do I need to reformat the backup disc? Do I need a backup disc that's larger than my internal HD even if I'm not using all that space?
The drive needs to be much larger than the amount of data it's backing-up. Usually 2-3 times is best, but it varies greatly depending on how you use your Mac.

Roll area too small

Hello All,
We have a background job which is getting canceled saying Roll area too small
can any 1 of you please explain what exciatly it means.
Regards,
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
This is related to Memory Allocation Sequence for all Work Process Types.
Please check the roll area parameters in your system. If the size allocated to roll area is low then background jobs will not finish successflly.
Please check the all other parameters also related to Memory Allocation.
ztta/roll_first: Defines the first part of the roll area that is allocated to dialog process
ztta/roll_area: Defines the total roll area per work process
rdisp/roll_SHM: Defines the size of the roll buffer
rdisp/roll_MAXFS: Defines the size of roll buffer and roll file
em/initial_size_MB: Defines the fixed size of extended memory
ztta/roll_extension: Defines the user quota for extended memory
abap/heap_area_dia: Defines the limit for the amount of local memory allocated to dialog work processes
abap/heap_area_nondia: Defines the limit for the amount of local memory allocated to non-dialog work processes
abap/heap_area_total: Defines the limit for the total amount of heap memory allocated to all work processes
Regards
Krishna Vanga

A procedure with a buffer too small problem

hey!
while running a procedure for loading data from csv file into a db table (on 9i db),
i got the error "ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small".
It's make scense since i have a large csv file (2 columns ,about 30,000 rows , containing 1 to 5 length number in each cell) .
My question: Is there any way to enlarge the buffer capacity in order to deal with such a large volume of data?
or any other way to fix the proc?
(of caurse now the buffer is set to max.).
thanks
yair

Is there any way to enlarge the buffer capacity in order to deal with such
a large volume of data?It's not the total volume of your data. Somewhere you are trying to fit a string into too small a column or variable....
SQL> declare
2      n number(4,0);
3 begin
4      n := &fourdigits;
5 end;
6 /
Enter value for fourdigits: 1234
old   4:     n := &fourdigits;
new   4:     n := 1234;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> r
1 declare
2      n number(4,0);
3 begin
4      n := &fourdigits;
5* end;
Enter value for fourdigits: 12345
old   4:     n := &fourdigits;
new   4:     n := 12345;
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: number precision too large
ORA-06512: at line 4
SQL> declare
2      v varchar2(4);
3 begin
4      v := &fourdigits;
5 end;
6 /
Enter value for fourdigits: 1234
old   4:     v := &fourdigits;
new   4:     v := 1234;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> r
1 declare
2      v varchar2(4);
3 begin
4      v := &fourdigits;
5* end;
Enter value for fourdigits: 12345
old   4:     v := &fourdigits;
new   4:     v := 12345;
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small
ORA-06512: at line 4
SQL> Cheers, APC
Blog : http://radiofreetooting.blogspot.com/

"Cells too small to split". As per usual.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for