Certificate based authentication with Cisco WLC and Juniper IC

Hi
I have a cisco WLC 4400 and Juniper IC which works as the external Radius server.
I want the wireless clients to be authenticated using certificates. I know the Juniper IC can understand certificates.
My question is can cisco WLC understand that the information being presented to it by the client is not username/pwd but a user certificate.
i have also looked at this article :
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/4400-series-wireless-lan-controllers/100590-ldap-eapfast-config.html
What i don't understand here is the need of WLC authenticating the user with his credentials by LDAP when it has authenticated the user cert.
All your help is appreciated.

Hi,
Since you use an external radius server you don't have to worry for this.
The only config that you need to do on WLC is to define the radius server under Security-AAA-Radius-Authentication and on your WLAN-Security-AAA.
The doc you refer is only for Local Radius on WLC.
Hope this helps
Regards,
Christos

Similar Messages

Certificate based authentication with sender SOAP adapter. Please help!

Hi Experts,
I have a scenario where first a .Net application makes a webservice call to XI via SOAP Adapter. Then the input from the .Net application is sent to the R/3 system via RFC adapter.
.Net --->SOAP -
>XI -
>RFC -
R/3 System
Now as per client requirement I have to implement certificate based authentication in the sender side for the webservice call. In this case the .Net application is the "client" and XI is the "server". In other words the client has to be authenticated by XI server. In order to accomplish this I have setup the security level in the SOAP sender channel as "HTTPS with client authentication". Additionally I have assigned a .Net userid in the sender agreement under "Assigned users" tab.
I have also installed the SSL certificate in the client side. Then generated the public key and loaded it into the XI server's keystore.
When I test the webservice via SOAPUI tool I am always getting the "401 Unauthorized" error. However if I give the userid/password for XI login in the properties option in the SOAPUI tool then it works fine. But my understanding is that in certificate based authentication, the authentication should happen based on the certificate and hence there is no need for the user to enter userid/password. Is my understanding correct? How to exactly test certificate based authentication?
Am I missing any steps for certificate based authentication?
Please help
Thanks
Gopal
Edited by: gopalkrishna baliga on Feb 5, 2008 10:51 AM

Hi!
Although soapUI is a very goot SOAP testing tool, you can't test certificate based authentication with it. There is no way (since I know) how to import certificat into soapUI.
So, try to find other tool, which can use certificates or tey it directly with the sender system.
Peter

X.509 certificate based authentication with load balancer

I've been asked to implement certificate-based authentication (CBA)
on a weblogic cluster serving up web services. I've read through
Chapter 10 (security) and understand the "Identity Assertion" concept.
Environment:
Weblogic 8.1 cluster fronted by a load-balancer that handles SSL and
uses sticky-sessions.
Question:
If the load balancer is used to handle SSL, do I still need to turn
on SSL on the weblogic cluster in order to use CBA? Is there another
way to request the client's certificate?
If the above is yes, what is the minnimal level of SSL? Does it have
to be two-way?
If SSL has to be turned on is there any reason to use the load
balancer's SSL? Is there still a performance benefit?

Hi George,
If you want the client's cert, the server has to ask for it and this
implies two-way SSL. Normal one-way SSL the server provides the cert to
the client and the client decides if it wants to continue the handshake.
If the client is OK with the server certs and two-way SSL is configured
on the server, then the server will request the client send it's certs.
If the client certs are OK, then the pipe is established.
Concerning the load balancer I'm assuming it is simply providing a
tunnel, but I don't have the experience to comment and it is something I
would suggest that you that you seek guidance from our outstanding
support team [1] or drop a note in the security newsgroup [2] for the
experts to review.
Regards,
Bruce
[1]
http://support.bea.com
[email protected]
[2]
http://newsgroups.bea.com/cgi-bin/dnewsweb?cmd=xover&group=weblogic.developer.interest.security
George Coller wrote:
>
I've been asked to implement certificate-based authentication (CBA)
on a weblogic cluster serving up web services. I've read through
Chapter 10 (security) and understand the "Identity Assertion" concept.
Environment:
Weblogic 8.1 cluster fronted by a load-balancer that handles SSL and
uses sticky-sessions.
Question:
If the load balancer is used to handle SSL, do I still need to turn
on SSL on the weblogic cluster in order to use CBA? Is there another
way to request the client's certificate?
If the above is yes, what is the minnimal level of SSL? Does it have
to be two-way?
If SSL has to be turned on is there any reason to use the load
balancer's SSL? Is there still a performance benefit?

DPS attempting certificate based authentication with Directory Servers

I'm running DPS 6.3 and DS 6.3.
I have DPS configured to always connect to the directory servers over SSL. This is working, however, all of the Direectory server error logs are showing certificate based bind attempts originating from the DPS. This results in err=32, since the certificate isn't stored in the ldap server. Anyone else seeing this type of behavior?
I checked the DPS Security config, and under the "Certificate to use with Data Sources" I have it set to 'None'.
Thanks.

Hello,
Certificate-based authentication cannot be proxied (it was designed to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks).
When the proxy receives a certificate-based bind (SASL EXTERNAL authentication method), it first validates the client certificate (signature, validity,trust etc), and map the certificate identity (subject) onto a LDAP identity. This is done by doing some LDAP lookups against the directory server. Then, that LDAP identity is used for subsequent LDAP requests to the directory servers. As the password is not available, the proxy must be configured to contact the directory server using proxied authorization method or using fixed credentials (used in conjunction with acis set on the proxy)
DPS 6.3 never uses the SASL/EXTERNAL (certificate-based) authentication method when it contacts directory servers.
When SSL is used between the proxy and the server, the proxy may present its own certificate to the directory server (controlled by the DPS security property you mentioned). It is possible to check if DPS stashes its own certificate when it establish a SSL channel to the directory server by using the ssltap tool [http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/tools/ssltap.html] . If a certificate is passed, the No-Such-Object error you see might be generated during certificate validation by the directory server.
Hope this helps
-Sylvain

Certificate based authentication with SSL load balancer

I've been asked to implement certificate-based authentication (CBA)
on a weblogic cluster serving up web services. I've read through
Chapter 10 (security) and understand the "Identity Assertion" concept.
Environment:
Weblogic 8.1 cluster fronted by a load-balancer that handles SSL and
uses sticky-sessions.
Question:
If the load balancer is used to handle SSL, do I still need to turn
on SSL on the weblogic cluster in order to use CBA? Is there another
way to request the client's certificate?
If the above is yes, what is the minnimal level of SSL? Does it have
to be two-way?
If SSL has to be turned on is there any reason to use the load
balancer's SSL? Is there still a performance benefit?

I think the simplest and most secure way is to have the servers configured for
2-way ssl, since this would ensure that the certificate they receive and use for
authentication has been validated during the ssl handshake. In this case the load
balancer itself does not need to and cannot do the handshaking, and would need
to pass the entire SSL connection through to the WLS server (ie: act similar to
a router)
Pavel.
"George Coller" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
I've been asked to implement certificate-based authentication (CBA)
on a weblogic cluster serving up web services. I've read through
Chapter 10 (security) and understand the "Identity Assertion" concept.
Environment:
Weblogic 8.1 cluster fronted by a load-balancer that handles SSL and
uses sticky-sessions.
Question:
If the load balancer is used to handle SSL, do I still need to turn
on SSL on the weblogic cluster in order to use CBA? Is there another
way to request the client's certificate?
If the above is yes, what is the minnimal level of SSL? Does it have
to be two-way?
If SSL has to be turned on is there any reason to use the load
balancer's SSL? Is there still a performance benefit?

Certificate based authentication with iOS Client

Hello experts,
I have a question regarding the certificate based authentication in SAP Mobile Documents. With the Android Client it is "easy" possible to use certificate based authentication by just sending the user certificate to the Android device (using mail, MDM or whatever).
For the iOS App it is written that the user has to sync the certificate to the device using iTunes sync. Is this really the only possibility to bring the certificate to the iOS device so that the App can use it? I have successfully tested by adding the certificate using iTunes, but I cannot make it working using MDM to push the certificate to the device. SAP Mobile Documents just cant see the installed certificate.
Am I doing something wrong here?
Thanks for your help.
Ernst

Hi, I don't think this is supported on iOS right now. Something for future ....

Certificate based authentication with Anyconnect

Dears,
i successfully configured ASA to be used as VPN gateway with anyconnect using certificate in authentication , my issue my be not realted to Cisco directly.
i am using CA server installed on Windows 2008 R2 , when i checked the issued certicate i found that all certicates requester name is "CAadmin" .
i need to differeniate between users certificate using thier domain users as requester name.
Thanks,
Ibrahim

John,
Reference the RFC for TLS (in this case 1.0)
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2246.txt
Server send certificate_list and certificate request, containing certificate_authorities, which is the key info here.
when client responds it can send a certificate
Client certificates are sent
using the Certificate structure defined in Section 7.4.2.
same section describing server certificate.
Server sends its certificate, certificate_list and list of acceptable signers of certificates it will accept (certificate_authorities), client responds with a (one) corresponding cert and certificate_list.
If server has client's signer certificate I do not believe it needed a whole chain sent.
Client still needs to send certificate list but can ommit signing root.
About CRL, you authenticate root and subCA, i.e. implicitly trust.
AFAIR you only perform revocation check of certs you do not implicitly trust.
(My PKI is a bit rusty, feel free to challange)
HTH,
M.
Message was edited by: Marcin Latosiewicz, re-read parts of RFC and adapted my answer.

NPS and Cisco ASA 5510 - AnyConnect Certificate based authentication

Hi everyone,
Hoping someone can help please.
We're trying to go for a single VPN solution at our company, as we currently have a few through, when buying other companies.
We're currently running a 2008 R2 domain, so we're looking at NPS and we have Cisco ASA 5510 devices for the VPN side.
What we would like to achieve, is certificate based authentication. So, user laptop has certificate applied via group policy based on domain membership and group settings, then user goes home. They connect via Cisco AnyConnect via the Cisco ASA 5510 and
then that talks to MS 2008 R2 NPS and authenticates for VPN access and following that, network connectivity.
Has anyone implemented this before and if so, are there any guides available please?
Many Thanks,
Dean.

Hi Dean,
Thanks for posting here.
Yes, this is possible . But we have guide about a sample that using Windows based server (RRAS) to act as VPN server and working with Windows RADIUS/NPS server and use certificate based authentication method (Extensible Authentication Protocol-Transport
Layer Security (EAP-TLS) or PEAP-TLS without smart cards) for reference :
Checklist: Configure NPS for Dial-Up and VPN Access
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754114.aspx
Thanks.
Tiger Li
Tiger Li
TechNet Community Support

Certificate Based Authentication - Questions and Authentication Modules

Hi Everyone
I'm trying to achieve a specific configuration using AM . I've installed the AM Server 7.1 on a AS9.1EE container and have another AS91EE container on another machine that has the agent configured.
The AM server is using a DS rep for configurations and dynamic profiles and using a AD rep for authentication.
What I now need to achieve is authentication base on one of these two way :
- user and password authentication (which is working)
- Certificate based authentication ( working on it )
To configure the Cert. Auth I've started reconfiguring the containers and agent to work in SSL, as said in the manuals. The manuals also say that the containers must have "Client Authentication Enabled", they don't say which ( either the server or agent container or both ) . Also I assume that "Client Authentication Enabled" is refering to the Http Listener configuration of that container.
When I enable it ( the Client Authentication ) on the http listener for either containers the https connection to that container stops working. In Firefox it simply prompts an error saying that the connection was "interrupted while the page was loading." . On IE, it prompts for a Certificate to be sent to the container and when I provide none, then it gives me the same error as Firefox. In both cases no page was presented.
Basically what I need is for both authentication methods described before to work! So, asking the certificate ( specially if it wasn't the AM asking for it ) without giving the user a chance to use a user/password combination isn't what is wanted.
From what I gathered the "Client Authentication" makes this http listener need a certificate to be presented always .
So, my first question is : is the documentation correct? Does this "Client Authentication" thingy need to be enabled at the listener level?
2- I'll probably need to code a costum module for this scenario I'm working in because of client requisits, but if possible I would like to use the provided module. Still, in case I need to make on, has anyone made a cert. auth module that they can provide me with so I have a working base to start with?
3- Is there a tested how-to anywhere on how to configure Cert. Based Authentication?
All for now,
Thank you all for your help
Rp

Hi Rp,
We are using AM 7.1 with Certificate Authentication and LDAP Authentication. To answer your question, yes it is possible to use both method at the same time i.e. Use certificate first and then fallback to LDAP.
First you need to configure AM's webcontainer to accept the certificate. From your message it is clear that you have done that. The only mistake that you did is "made the Client Authentication required". I have done this in Sun WebServer 7.0 and Sun Application Server 7.0 (yeah that is old!!). You need to make the Client Authentication as optional. It means that Certificate will be transferred only when it is available otherwise Web Container will not ask for the Certificate. You will have to search Glassfish website or ASEE 9.1 manual to learn how to make the Client-Authentication Optional. You definitely need this authentication optional as Web Agent will be connecting to this AM and as far as I know they do not have any mechanism to do the Client Authentication.
Secondly, In AM 7.1, you will have to Set up the Authentication chaining. Where you can make Certificate Module as Sufficient and LDAP module as REQUIRED.
Thirdly, if you are using an non ocsp based certificate then change the ocsp checking in AMConfig.properties to false.
Fourth, You may have to write a small custom code to get the profile from your external sources. (if you need to then I can tell you how).
HTH,
Vivek

MfE with Certificate Based Authentication on E6

Hello,
I've been trying to setup MfE on my E6 but I can't find a way to configure it to use a personal certificate, I even tried using "Nokia Configuration Tool" but it tells me that my device does not support MfE with Certificate Based Authentication, I get "Invalid Credentials" when using a username & password.
I get the same error on both Anna and Belle.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks

Better give the MfE configuration in detail.
Also please advise the if the server is a real Microsoft Exchange Server or a third-party mail service such as Gmail or Live.
bbao
* If this post helped you, please click the white Kudo star.
* If this post has solved your issue, please click Accept as Solution.

ActiveSync with Certificate-Based Authentication

We are trying to setup ActiveSync with certificate-based authentication against Exchange 2010 SP2, but with no luck.
What has been done so far:
OWA over https works fine. A public, trusted certificate is in place.
Setup ActiveSync against this Exchange server: works fine, using user name/password.
Issued a user cert, signed with an internal CA, CA-cert successfully imported into al client devices.
Created a new OWA-site with cert-based authentication (just to make sure it works), imported user certificate into a mac, visit this OWA site - cert-based authentication works fine.
Now, with the configuration utility, created configuration profile with that user cert and an ActiveSync account, left password blank and chose the imported cert (p12) as authentication means.
After installing that last profile the device keeps asking for a password and refuses to synchronize. Logs on the server show error 401.2, so I assume iPhone is ignoring the cert and is trying to use password-authentication instead.
The devices tested were iPhone 3G with IOS 4 and iPad 2 with IOS 5.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Roman.

No-one with this experience?
We've done some network analysis (as much as was possible to decrypt) and could see, that the server sends an SSL-Alert (rejection?) to the client after the client presents the certificate.
That explains why the client falls back to password-authentication, but it does not tell us why the server rejects the cert (that is accepted perfectly when accessed from a browser) in first place.

OWA and ActiveSync certificate based authentication

I have Exchange 2013 CU3 installed and want to activate the certificate based authentication for ActiveSync and OWA. But I want to have the login without certificate as well for users without a certificate.
I already found some information how to do that on Exchange 2010 and I already did all steps to activate it.
But at one point I cant find anything to configure in Exchange 2013. So I have activated the AD certificate based authentication in ISS and configured the OWA folder in IIS to accept client certificates. This seems to work as I get asked to use the certificate
when I open the OWA page. But then I am landing on the OWA login page where I have to enter username and password.
So it seems that I am missing something. In the tutorials for Exchange 2010 they activate the certificate based authentication in the Management console. But I cant find anything in ECP to activate.
Can anyone help me?

Hi,
We can create an additional Web Site in IIS to configure additional OWA and ECP virtual directory for external access. And configuring the Default Web Site for internal access.
Then we can configure internal one with Integrated Windows authentication and Basic authentication while the external one configured for forms-based authentication of Domain\user name format. For more information about
Configuring Multiple OWA/ECP Virtual Directories, we can refer to:
https://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2011/01/17/configuring-multiple-owa-ecp-virtual-directories-on-exchange-2010-client-access-server.aspx
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2010 SP3 OWA with certificate based authentication

Hi,
I have a bizarre problem in my customer’s environment. Maybe someone has an idea.
Exchange 2010 with SP3, latest cumulative Update installed.
The problem I’m having is that when I enable Certificate based authentication (require client certificate option in IIS) on OWA and ECP virtual directories in conjunction with forms based authentication (this is the requirement – the user
must have a client certificate and type in username and password to log in to OWA), the result is that after the user selects the certificate he wants to use, he is logged into OWA automatically, but cannot use the website, because it’s being constantly automatically
refreshed (or redirected to itself or something like that). The behavior occurs with all users, with any browser. If client certificate is on required, forms based authentication works just fine. If I switch to “Basic Authentication” and enable client certificate
requirement, then OWA act’s as it should be – so no problems. The problem only occurs when authentication type is forms based and client certificates are required.
I have tried the exact same settings (as far as I can tell) on one other production server and one test server, and encountered no such problems.
Anyone – any ideas?

Hi McWax,
According to your description and test, I understand that all accounts cannot login OWA when select require client certificate.
Is there any error message when open OWA or login? For example, return error ”HTTP error: 403 - Forbidden”. Please post relative error for further troubleshooting.
I want to confirm which authentication methods are used for OWA, Integrated Windows authentication or Digest authentication? More details about it, for your reference:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb430796(v=exchg.141).aspx
If you select another authentication method, please check whether Client Certificate Mapping Authentication services is installed, and also enabled in IIS, please refer to:
http://www.iis.net/configreference/system.webserver/security/authentication/clientcertificatemappingauthentication
To prevent firewall factor, please try to sign in OWA at CAS server. Besides, I find a FAQ about certificate:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998424(v=exchg.80).aspx
Best Regards,
Allen Wang

Certificate Based Authentication and SSL

To whom it may concern,
I have installed SJES on Solaris 9 x386 (intel version). Everything is running fine, the mails are also coming and going.
Now, I need Certificate based authentication and SSL. I have downloaded versign.com trial certificate and have install it succesfully in the Messaging Server Console -- > Manage Certificates. The certificate is also visible in its tab.
Next, I followed the documentation and enable ssl by using ./configutil utility. And also restarted the server.
I am running my Messenger express (http) like this :
http://testing.xyz.com:8100
(I am using port 8100 for http access to mails). After restarting the mail server, I tried :
https://testing.xyz.com:8100 also,
http://testing.xyz.com:443 also,
https://testing.xyz.com:443 also,
but I cannot see the login page of the mail server. All the above mention url i tried and just given error "the connection was refused when attempting to contact testing.xyz.com. I CAN ONLY SEE THE LOGIN PAGE WHEN I WRITE THE OLD HTTP ADDRESS: i.e. http://testing.xyz.com:8100
And I also checked the logs and the server is having no problem in starting and there is not a single word regarding SSL enabling in the logs.
Please help me out, it's really a strange behaviour. I am using SunONE Messaging Server 6.0.
Thanking you,
Farhan Ahmed,
System Engineer
Dubai, UAE.

Dear jay,
I am pasting a line from imap and http logs ... i don't know what this error means and how to resolve it.
[29/Dec/2004:14:42:45 +0100] testing imapd[888]: General Error: SSL initialization error: ASockSSL_Init: couldn't find cert Server-Cert (-8183)
strange thing is that my certificate name is lowercase server-cert and also i can see in the GUI console the certificate name as lowercase and I have also set this parameter encryption.rsa.nssslpersonalityssl = server-cert (all lowercase), but the error in the log tells it as "Server-Cert" !!!! though it is "server-cert"
i got this line from the http log:
[29/Dec/2004:14:42:47 +0100] testing httpd[894]: General Error: SSL initialization error: ASockSSL_Init: couldn't find cert Server-Cert (-8183)
I haven't missed the sslpassword.conf file step. I have placed the same password which i provided while generating the certificate request in the GUI.
Help me out what this errors means and how to resolve them. I have also copied the cert7.db and key3.db to /opt/SUNWms*/config directory from the /var/opt/mps/serverroot/alias
Thanking you,
Farhan Ahmed,
System Engineer,
Dubai Internet City, Dubai, UAE.

Hellp on Nokia E61i associating with Cisco WLC 4402

I met some problem with associate Nokia's dual mode mobile phone E61i with Cisco WLC 4402, hope someone can help me on it:
I setup a VOICE WLAN in 4402(v5.0.148), Layer2 security is WPA1+WPA2, Key management using 802.1x, WPA1 policy enable both TKIP and AES, Radius server using ACS engine(v4.1.1.23)(enable PEAP-MSCHAPv2);
I can use my laptop to join this WLAN(my laptop configure with PEAP/MSCHAPv2, WPA-TKIP, not validate server certificate), but can't let E61i join it, each time it will remind me âunable to connect, WPA authenticate failed).
In E61i, I select WPA/WPA2 as WLAN security mode, enable EAP-PEAP, under EAP-PEAP, I enable EAP-MSCHAPv2; however under Cipher, there's a lot of options such as âRSA,3EDS,SHAâ, âRSA,AES,SHAâ, but there's no TKIP, I have tried to enable all of them and tried only enable those items which include AES, but I failed each time with the same reminder âunable to connect, WPA authenticate failedâ. I checked ACS's failed log, there's no record; In 4402, there also have no record.
If I change the security to open or static WEP for VOICE WLAN, then the E61i can connect to the WLAN.
I think the problem maybe relate to encryption or certificate, right now I just do the test in lab, not in customer's real environment, so I use ACS to generate a self signed certificate and installed it in ACS.
Pls. help to point me what I need to adjust to make it work. Thanks!

Hello,
CCKM Key Management mode on Nokia E61i phone can be used
against Cisco LWAPP AP's with TKIP encryption
Nokia E61i (and other E-series WLAN enabled phones) are supporting CCKM key management method with both dynamic WEP and TKIP ciphers.
On the phone configuration, 802.1X security mode needs to be in use in order to enable CCKM support.Â WPA/WPA2 security mode on the phone is dedicated to standards basedÂ WPA and WPA2 methods and it does not allow usage of proprietary CCKM key management method.
Phone's 802.1X security mode does not mean that phone would only support dynamic WEP encryption method in this mode although in contexts term "802.1X" may be attached to pure dynamic WEP (legacy / pre WPA era)security methods.
Â 802.1X security mode can be seen on Nokia Eseries phones as sort of an "everything with EAP based authentication is allowed" mode, meaning that following key management and cipher configurations are supported:
- WPA-EnterpriseÂ = WPA Key Management (EAP based authentication) with TKIP encryption
- WPA2-EnterpriseÂ = WPA2 Key Management (EAP based authentication) with AES encryption
- Mixed WPA/WPA2-Enterprise = I.e. WPA/WPA2 Mode Migration WPA2 Key Management (EAP based authentication) with AES (for unicast data) and TKIP (for multicast data) ciphers
- 802.1X dynamic WEP = legacy (pre-WPA era) 802.1XÂ based dynamic WEP (EAP based authentication with dynamic WEP encryption)
Supported:
- CCKM with WEP = CCKM Key Management (EAP based authentication) with dynamic WEP encryption
- CCKM with TKIP = CCKM Key Management (EAP based authentication) with TKIP encryption
Not supported:
- CCKM with AES = CCKM Key Management (EAP based authentication) with AES encryption
Please note that CCKM-AES mode (CCKM Key Management with AES cipher) is not working properly due to some incompatibilities between Cisco and Nokia implementations thus it must not be listed as a supported combination on the current Nokia E-series devices. We are also seeing CCKM-Fast
Re-authentication failures with Cisco autonomous AP's when AES encryption is used althoughÂ initial authentication to autonomous AP's is successful.Â Nokia is currently working with Cisco to get CCKM-AES based authentications and roaming working properly with both LWAPP and autonomous Cisco AP's.
Â Also note that Nokia E-SeriesÂ does not support Cisco proprietary CKIP/CMIC encryption/data integrity methods. CKIP/CMIC is supported at least by Cisco autonomous AP's and it seems to be available also
at least on LWAPP AP version 4.1.171.0.
Â CCKM on E-Series devices has been tested against Cisco LWAPP (ver. 4.1.171.0) and it works when TKIP encryption is in use (WPA Policy + TKIP encryption in Cisco LWAPP configuration terms).
In practice this means Cisco LWAPP is configured in a following manner: WLAN -> Edit -> Security->Â
Layer 2 Security = WPA+WPA2
WPA+WPA2 Parameters:
-WPA Policy = enabled
-WPA Encryption = TKIP enabled, AES disabled
-WPA2 policy = disabled
-Auth.Key Mgmt = CCKM
Br,
-Pasi-

Certificate based authentication with Cisco WLC and Juniper IC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for