Certification required for HANA SPS Upgrades?

Hi
I was just asked by the Hardware vendor what type of certification we need, to perform the HANA Support Pack Upgrade to stay in compliance for warranty.
Am I correct in assuming thatthe HA200 - HANA Installation and Operations certification is what they're speaking about or is there something else required?
Ken

Hi Ken,
To be honest, I never thought about certification requirement for HANA updates. I'd be surprised that you need certification for that.
Maybe Hay Bouten will be able to answer that.
In the event that you are interested in certification for HANA administration then one of the following is the one you would want to start with.
https://training.sap.com/shop/certification/c_hanatec142-sap-certified-technology-associate---sap-hana-edition-2014-g/
https://training.sap.com/shop/certification/c_hanatec141-sap-certified-technology-associate-edition-2014---sap-hana-g/
KR,
Amerjit

Similar Messages

  • Certification Required for India

    Hi All,
    Is the certification required for consultant level positions in India.
    Regards,
    M

    Hi Manisha,
    Certification is not necessary for consultant positions in India, but if you are certified then this will be an added advantage for you.
    Companies doesnot look for certified people only, the first criteria for consultant is how good domain knowledge do you have? Do you have experience in that field or not, if yes then how good you have worked in earlier project. When you have certification then its an added advantage for you than the others who are appearing for the position for interview.
    In short certification is not must, but having is always an extra edge over others.
    Regards,
    Subhasha Ranjan

  • Windows App Certification Toolkit fails on Certification requirements for Windows desktop apps Point 5.5

    Using the latest Version 3.4 of Windows App Certification Toolkit to check Windows 8.1 compatibility our Installer was not approved on:
    Certification requirements for Windows desktop apps
    5.5 Your app installer must create the correct registry entries to allow successful detection and uninstalls
    But all necessary settings are done and after the installation of our application we will find all settings in the registry.
    We use an MSI Installer embedded in a bootstrapper exe. The MSI Installer is made with the WiX Toolset V3.6.
    The same Application Installer got approved on November, 2014.
    We checked this issue against the latest version of MSThreatModelingToolkit installer which also was made with WiX toolset and it fails, too.
    So is there a higher restriction or do we miss anything?

    Hi Wibudev,
    I would suggest you to double check if you have miss something in registry, per documentation mentioned, the installation module must create the following registry entries during installation:
    DisplayName
    InstallLocation
    Publisher
    UninstallString
    VersionMajor or MajorVersion
    VersionMinor or MinorVersion
    WACK 3.4 is the latest version, I don't think there would be any higher restriction but I will recommend you to test with another computer to see if the validate fails again. Sometimes the issue could be on the PC environment.
    --James
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • What level of certification is required for ECC 6 upgrades?

    Hi everyone,
    I'm already a ceritifed SAP technology consultant (up to NW2004), however need to update my certification for ECC 6 (netweaver 7).
    What is the appropriate exam to sit (eg associate or professional) to be allowed to perform productive SAP ECC 6 upgrades?
    Thanks
    Shaun

    Hi everyone,
    Major update on the "do you need to be certified" topic ...
    I finally got a reply from SAP Education regarding two queries I had regarding what level of certification was required as a basis "guy" to perform production SAP installations and upgrades.
    SAP Education wrote:
    You don't need to be certified to do installations. In reality, customers will have much more comfort having an install done by someone who is certified rather than someone who isnu2019t, but ultimately itu2019s the customeru2019s call.
    I then asked if this was applicable for SAP upgrades also ...
    SAP Education wrote:
    Hi Shaun,
    Indeed it is.
    Best of luck!
    I then went on to clarify that their is no support implications for customers who don't you certified Basis personel to perform their upgrades/installs:
    Shaun wrote:
    So your saying that although itu2019s preferable to be certified ... you donu2019t have to be, and there is no impact to the support provided by SAP?
    SAP Education wrote:
    Ultimately, SAP cannot mandate for individuals (excluding those employed by SAP) or SAP Partners to be certified to work on projects. However, customers and partners will employ the consultants to work on the projects, from what we have seen recently customers and partners are now asking for SAP certified consultants to work on implementation and upgrade projects.
    Thus we suggest to have an advantage to be employed on future SAP projects that you are certified in the solution you will be working on, or upgrading to.
    Example: If you are looking to work on an upgrade from CRM 5.0 to CRM 7.0 the customer would look for certified consultants in CRM 7.0
    So it is solely up to you if you wish to certify yourself in the latest release of the solution you are working in.
    I then rang SAP education and had a very pleasant discussion with one of the ladies there.  She went on to explain that the requirement for certification really became an optional thing a few years back.  SAP was no longer in a position not to support customers regardless of who they use to perform their upgrades/installs since a customer continues to pay their yearly maintenance costs - thus SAP is obligated to provide support.

  • Basic Question Solaris SPARC required for 10.2 upgrade from 9.2

    We are running Oracle 9.2 releases on Windows and Solaris SPARC 2.6
    SUN 450 Dual UltraSparc II
    Where can I find system and OS requirements for Solaris for Oracle 10.2
    database? I have looked in many different install guides and they all
    reference Solaris 10 but don't say whats required.

    You find this information here:
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/support/metalink/index.html
    For 10g at least you need Solaris 2.8
    Werner

  • SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FOR LOGIC STUDIO-upgrade from LOGIC PRO 7

    I have been using LOGIC PRO 7 on my G5 1.8ghz Power PC G5 with 768 MB DDR SDRAM with no problems. I'd LOVE to upgrade to the new 8. I notice it said minimum req is 1.25ghz and 1gig of ram.
    Will I be able to run this on my current system for basic recording, etc. Do I REALLY need the 1.25 and 1 gig of ram? If i'm doing no more than 8 tracks live at a time-live instruments?

    Hi Mikey, First off they mean a G4 1.25 or faster. Your G5 1.8 should be fine. Second, the 768MB of RAM will be an issue. Fortunately RAM for your machine isn't that expensive. If I were you I'd load up with as much as you can. It will help you in all aspects of your computing, not just Logic. Check out the link below for some options.
    http://eshop.macsales.com/MyOWC/Upgrades.cfm?model=183&type=Memory&TI=0552&shoup grds=Show+Upgrades
    Stootka
    P.S. I am in no way affiliated with the retailer in the link, it's just the first place I thought of. You may want to search on a few more to shop for the best deal.

  • Certification requirement for Collaboration Architecture

    Hi All,
    Our company wants to get Cisco Collaboration Architecture Specialization for which there is requirement of Exam Implementing Cisco Unity Connection (642-263). I have previously done Implementing Cisco Unity Connection (642-262). Would this be valid for achieving the specialization or I need to re-exam 642-263?
    Regards,
    Muhammad

    Create a custom global condition called "OS Architecture x64" and use it as an existential rule.  You are either x64 or are not x64 (implying x86... you'll be on the next version of ConfigMgr when 128-bit Windows comes out...).
    For the rule, use a WQL query to look at the architecture of the OS.
    Win32_OperatingSystem
    OSArchitecture = '64-bit'
    I hope that helps!
    Nash
    Nash Pherson, Senior Systems Consultant
    Now Micro -
    My Blog Posts
    If you found a bug or want the product to work differently,
    share your feedback.
    <-- If this post was helpful, please click the up arrow or propose as answer.
    See that's why I posted here. I knew somebody out there had to have come up with a good solution for this and I have to say Nash this is indeed very clever and now that you spelled it out for me also a total no-brainer. Either it is 64-Bit or it isn't!
    That's really all I need to know for my deployment. I was working on two conditions (a 32-Bit and a 64-bit) when (really) all I needed was one. Very very slick. I love it man, thanks for sharing!

  • Hardware Requirements for Android Adobe Air Installation or certification requirement?

    Hi, Friends,
    I am newbie on Adobe Air and tried to install Air apk on my android ICS device from Google Play.
    However, it complains that the device is not compatible with the software package.
    I wonder if there are any hardware requirements or certification requirement for new android phone device on the market.
    Regards
    -Charles

    Well, my theory is it only works on 4g phones, at least with Metro PCS phones!
    Using the following 3g phones, I got "device is not compatible"
    - Hawai ascend  OS  (3g)  ~incompatible
    - HTC (3g) ~incompatible
    - Samsung Admire (3g) ~incompatible
    But after buying my $300+ 4g LG phone, also from Metro PCS, the Adobe AIR installed sucessfully.
    Also, I as fyi, noticed that Adobe Air app did not show up in the Google play list on the 3g phones.
    I hope this info helps.
    Best,
    Will (from waitingonsanta.com)

  • Disk Space Requirements - 11.5.9 Upgrade to Rel 12

    Just wondering, roughly, aside from the database, how much disk space should I require for a basic upgrade of Oracle Fins - release 11.5.9 to release 12?
    Is release 12 just like 11i was - meaning, it installed all the apps, even though you used just a few?
    Thanks.

    In addition to Gareth's very valid observations, you might also find Metalink Note 399362.1 to be useful...it shows data and tablespace growth statistics from an 11i->R12 upgrade.
    On our systems, I've seen about 3-5% growth in the size of the database when doing the R12 upgrade, but our system is fairly new...closer to the "3 year" system described in the note.
    Regards,
    John P.

  • HANA SPS 08 Upgrade Prerequisite - Update GCC version

    Dear All,
    As we know HANA SPS 08 is now GA. . However, one of the prerequisite of upgrade is to update GCC version on HANA platform to GCC 4.7 (SAP Note 2020199).
    There are customers who might be running multiple systems on one box. For example: DEV and QA environment on one hardware. If they update GCC version on box and then upgrade DEV to SPS 08 then can this upgrade disturb QA which is still on SPS 07?
    Your suggestions will be really appreciated.
    Regards
    Angad
    Message was edited by: Tom Flanagan

    Hi Angad,
    reasonable question, but luckily no problem!
    Checking on a rev. 74 system we find the following as the required GLIBC runtime versions:
    strings libhdbrskernel.so | grep GLIBC
    GLIBC_2.3
    GLIBC_2.2.5
    GLIBCXX_3.4.9
    GLIBCXX_3.4
    GLIBC_2.3.2
    GLIBC_2.3.4
    The same command on a rev. 80 system delivers
    GLIBC_2.3
    GLIBC_2.2.5
    GLIBCXX_3.4.9
    GLIBCXX_3.4.11
    GLIBCXX_3.4
    GLIBC_2.3.2
    GLIBC_2.3.4
    Now, the shared object containing these libraries is the /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.
    This is the list of supported c-lib version on a kernel 11.1 system:
    cat /etc/SuSE-release
    SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64)
    VERSION = 11
    PATCHLEVEL = 1
    strings /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 | grep 3.4
    GLIBCXX_3.4
    GLIBCXX_3.4.1
    GLIBCXX_3.4.2
    GLIBCXX_3.4.3
    GLIBCXX_3.4.4
    GLIBCXX_3.4.5
    GLIBCXX_3.4.6
    GLIBCXX_3.4.7
    GLIBCXX_3.4.8
    GLIBCXX_3.4.9
    GLIBCXX_3.4.10
    and this is the same on a 11.3 system:
    cat /etc/SuSE-release
    SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64)
    VERSION = 11
    PATCHLEVEL = 3
    strings /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 | grep 3.4
    GLIBCXX_3.4
    GLIBCXX_3.4.1
    GLIBCXX_3.4.2
    GLIBCXX_3.4.3
    GLIBCXX_3.4.4
    GLIBCXX_3.4.5
    GLIBCXX_3.4.6
    GLIBCXX_3.4.7
    GLIBCXX_3.4.8
    GLIBCXX_3.4.9
    GLIBCXX_3.4.10
    GLIBCXX_3.4.11
    GLIBCXX_3.4.12
    GLIBCXX_3.4.13
    GLIBCXX_3.4.14
    GLIBCXX_3.4.15
    GLIBCXX_3.4.16
    GLIBCXX_3.4.17
    CXXABI_1.3.4
    As you see: both sets of API requirements are fully covered by the required (GCC 4.7 runtime) libraries.
    So, no problem for multi revision instance installations.
    Cheers,
    Lars

  • Is Solution Manager required for ECC 6.0 upgrade?

    We will upgrade our system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0.  Is Solution Manager a required tool in ECC 6.0?  My understanding is Solution Manager has to be run on a different server, ie.  we will have to buy a new server.   We have a small SAP implementation with only FI & CO modules, so we are trying to cut our costs if we could.  Can anybody share their experience?  Thanks for any input.

    In an Upgrade , Solution Manager is required for Upgrade Keys and downloading the support packs . Now a days to download the support packs you have to approve it in Solution Manager otherwise it won't show up in your download basket.
    May be SAP can provide you the keys & approve the SPs ( they used to do that before ) , in that case it isn't required.
    You can also manage your upgrade project in Solman . Sooner or later you need to install solution manager. it's a nice system.Many good features like central monitoring, early watch alert etc etc ...
    Thanks
    Prince Jose

  • SAP Components required for EHP1 Upgrade

    Hi Experts,
    I have started the process of downloading files for an EHP1 upgrade of our current BI System (ABAP Stack only, Netweaver 7), with a Target Stack of SPS07.
    Using the Maintenance Optimizer, I have selected the appropriate Kernel, SPAM Version and BI Content Patches and Iu2019m now in a position to download the SAP Components.
    I am a little confused as to the list of SAP Components that have been presented via the Maintenance Optimizer, which provides the following list:
    SAP BASIS
    File Name     Description     Version                         
    KB70015.SAR     Basis Support Package 15 for 7.00     SAP BASIS 7.00                         
    KB70016.SAR     Basis Support Package 16 for 7.00     SAP BASIS 7.00                         
    SAP BASIS
    File Name     Description     Version                         
    SAP_BASIS701.SAR     Attribute Change Package 04 for SAP_BASIS 701     SAP BASIS 7.01                         
    KB70107.SAR     Basis Support Package 0007 for 7.01     SAP BASIS 7.01                         
    KB70101.SAR     Basis Support Package 01 for 7.01     SAP BASIS 7.01                         
    KB70102.SAR     Basis Support Package 02 for 7.01     SAP BASIS 7.01                         
    KB70103.SAR     Basis Support Package 03 for 7.01     SAP BASIS 7.01                         
    KB70104.SAR     Basis Support Package 04 for 7.01     SAP BASIS 7.01                         
    KB70105.SAR     Basis Support Package 05 for 7.01     SAP BASIS 7.01                         
    KB70106.SAR     Basis Support Package 06 for 7.01     SAP BASIS 7.01                         
    K-701DHINSAPBASIS.SAR     SAP_BASIS 701 Upgrade     SAP BASIS 7.01                         
    SAP ABA
    File Name     Description     Version                         
    KA70107.SAR     ABA Support Package 0007 for 7.01     SAP ABA 7.01                         
    KA70101.SAR     ABA Support Package 01 for 7.01     SAP ABA 7.01                         
    KA70102.SAR     ABA Support Package 02 for 7.01     SAP ABA 7.01                         
    KA70103.SAR     ABA Support Package 03 for 7.01     SAP ABA 7.01                         
    KA70104.SAR     ABA Support Package 04 for 7.01     SAP ABA 7.01                         
    KA70105.SAR     ABA Support Package 05 for 7.01     SAP ABA 7.01                         
    KA70106.SAR     ABA Support Package 06 for 7.01     SAP ABA 7.01                         
    K-701DHINSAPABA.SAR     SAP_ABA 701 Upgrade     SAP ABA 7.01                         
    SAP BW
    File Name     Description     Version                         
    KW70107.SAR     BW Support Package 0007 for 7.01     SAP BW 7.01                         
    KW70101.SAR     BW Support Package 01 for 7.01     SAP BW 7.01                         
    KW70102.SAR     BW Support Package 02 for 7.01     SAP BW 7.01                         
    KW70103.SAR     BW Support Package 03 for 7.01     SAP BW 7.01                         
    KW70104.SAR     BW Support Package 04 for 7.01     SAP BW 7.01                         
    KW70105.SAR     BW Support Package 05 for 7.01     SAP BW 7.01                         
    KW70106.SAR     BW Support Package 06 for 7.01     SAP BW 7.01                         
    K-701DHINSAPBW.SAR     SAP_BW 701 Upgrade     SAP BW 7.01                         
    PI_BASIS
    File Name     Description     Version                         
    K-701DHINPIBASIS.SAR     PI_BASIS 701 Upgrade     PI_BASIS 7.01                         
    K-70107INPIBASIS.SAR     PI_BASIS Support Package 0007 for 7.01     PI_BASIS 7.01                         
    K-70101INPIBASIS.SAR     PI_BASIS Support Package 01 for 7.01     PI_BASIS 7.01                         
    K-70102INPIBASIS.SAR     PI_BASIS Support Package 02 for 7.01     PI_BASIS 7.01                         
    K-70103INPIBASIS.SAR     PI_BASIS Support Package 03 for 7.01     PI_BASIS 7.01                         
    K-70104INPIBASIS.SAR     PI_BASIS Support Package 04 for 7.01     PI_BASIS 7.01                         
    K-70105INPIBASIS.SAR     PI_BASIS Support Package 05 for 7.01     PI_BASIS 7.01                         
    K-70106INPIBASIS.SAR     PI_BASIS Support Package 06 for 7.01     PI_BASIS 7.01                         
    ST-PI
    File Name     Description     Version                         
    KITLRDA.SAR     ST-PI 2008_1_700: Add-On Installation     ST-PI 2008_1_700                         
    KITLRD1.SAR     ST-PI 2008_1_700: SP 0001     ST-PI 2008_1_700                         
    KITLRD2.SAR     ST-PI 2008_1_700: SP 0002     ST-PI 2008_1_700                         
    KITLRD3.SAR     ST-PI 2008_1_700: SP 0003     ST-PI 2008_1_700                         
    My confusion is that it doesnu2019t appear to be a full list, which is based on the assumption that I would have had to upgrade to the Latest SPu2019s, as viewed in the SLD first (see list below for reference)?
    Is there a requirement to upgrade to the latest set of SPu2019s first, or can I upgrade to EHP1 SPS07 just using the list provided via the Maintenance Optimizer?
    Our current SP levelu2019s:
    In BOLD -        Current SP/PL ,   Latest SP
    BI CONT 7.03                       8                  16
    6*PI_BASIS 2006_1_700            4            11
    SAP ABA 7.00          14          21
    SAP BASIS 7.00          14          21
    SAP BW 7.00          16          23
    ST-PI 2008_1_700          1          1
    VIRSANH 520_700          12          15
    Any help, much appreciated,
    Chris

    Hi,
    No it is not necessary to upgrade to the latest SPS of the current version first (NW 7.0) before upgrading to 7.01.
    All what it requires is a minimum SP/SPS level & you are already on that & MOPZ has therefore proposed only the files for 7.01
    SPS.
    - Regards, Dibya

  • I want to upgrade my 2008 Mac pro to the latest one, will it meet the requirement for the future Software that's coming out for the next four years?

    I want to upgrade my 2008 Mac pro to the latest one, will it meet the requirement for the future Software that's coming out for the next four years?.

    I'd wait. What can't you do that you need? You mean you want to buy a new model, then why not wait for an actual new one, not the two year old 5,1, when you need to and have outgrown.
    Yours will run Mountain Lion. yours is 4 yrs old and still supported and has life left.

  • MacPro 2,1 Videocard Upgrade Requirements for Final Cut Pro X ?

    I bought Final Cut Pro X in June, had no problem to install it on my MacPro 2,1 with processor
    2 x 3 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon, RAM 4 GB and Graphic Card and  ATI Radeon X1900 XT 512 MB running under Mac OS Snow Leopard. Recently I upgraded RAM to 8 GB. After switching to Mac OS Lion in july it continued to run in an unchange manner, even if not totally satisfactory due to the known buggy behavior of FCP X reported by many users, but it was anyway as usable as when I installed it.
    Yesterday I decided to update FCPX to version 10.0.01, and did so in recommended manner by first deleting version 10.0.0 to the trash and empty the trash can. When I was going to install the new version of FCPX, as recommended, from the "Purchased" department of Appstore, I was denied to do so due to this message: "We could not complete Your purchase - Your computer’s video card does not meet the minimum system requirements".
    That´s it, and here I´m stocked in a situation not being able to use FCP X which I have payed 229 $ for, because Apple has taken the right from me to use this application anymore. I can understand that Apple give You good recommendations concerning "the requirements" for running an application, but I doubt it´s acceptable and fair of Apple denying/hindering me to buy the product anyway, or, as in this case of mine, to use a product I´ve already payed for. Fact is, that even if the recommended requirements in respect to my video card not is met for this application (FCPX), so far I´ve still been able to use and benefit from it despite my computers "substandard quality" for running FCP X.
    So, now I´m feeling forced to invest in a new videocard as well, if I want to continue to use my bought license of FCP X...What card do I need?
    I´m considering to buy the video card ATI Radeon HD 5770 1 GB - do You think this card is compatible with my MacPro 2,1 build, and will meet the requirements of Final Cut Pro X version 10.0.01?

    I wonder if there's any reason why OpenCL couldn't be an optional processing preference?
    That way folks who had computers which do not have OCL or other cards which don't meet the spec could at least function knowing that the renders would not be optimal - or maybe real time playback of non optimized media might not be possible. But at least they'd be able to function.
    I'm sure OCL cant be  necessary for General display purposes in a 2D environment like video editing.
    To shut out someones system without warning in a 0.01 update seems a bit radical to me.

  • SharePoint Online : Unable to load type Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeCompatibilityException required for deserialization.

    From today's morning , We are having Issue on Our Online SharePoint Site.
    Each WebPart is not loading and displaying this Line
    Unable to load type Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeCompatibilityException required for deserialization.
    Please write in quick response to fix it at
    [email protected]

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that SharePoint Online Site was unable to load web part and got the “Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeCompatibilityException” error.
    Per my knowledge, the SPUpgradeCompatibilityException occurs during upgrade when the front-end Web server attempts to connect to an incompatible database.
    Please check whether the database is compatible.
    Regarding SharePoint Online, for quick and accurate answers to your questions, it is recommended that you initial a new thread in Office 365 forum.
    Office 365 forum
    http://community.office365.com/en-us/forums/default.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Linda Li
    Linda Li
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for

  • Select with out into in plsql

    hi all i want to write a select statment in a procedure with out into statement .. is it possilbe if yes how can i do this. if its not possible then if we have to Return a number of rows from procedure then how can i do this.. thanks in advance

  • Renumbering frames/layers cs-4?

    Morning all, I have been importing QT video;'s via: Import video frames to layers, I then duplicate some of the layers as well as add others. Now, these show up in the layers column as i.e. layer 1 copy, layer 1 copy 2 etc, etc. In the animation (fra

  • Can you use a Windows-only printer over a print server?

    I recently found a large format printer from Ricoh that has great reviews and prints postscript with laser speed/economy with some new inkjet technology only they have - perfect for a home design office and a LOT cheaper than a typical tabloid laser.

  • I am heading to Europe and I would like to use my iPhone there

    Is there a way to use a European carrier's sim card and swap it for the ATT sim? Thanks for the help

  • Older CS on new mac?

    I want to use Creative Suite in a Location without Internet (I pay enough for the Internet I use here).Is it possible to install an older CS on a new Mac?