Certification to become MCSA: Windows 7

What certification do I need to require the title MCSA: Windows 7 (after 31th of January 2014)?
Do I need to require 70-680 + 70-685 + 70-686

From the certification page:
http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en-us/mcsa-windows-7-certification.aspx
you need exam 70-680 plus either 685 or 686 (not both).
Apparently, the only change after January 2014 is that these exams will no longer give you the MCTS and MCITP certifications, but the requirements for the MCSA will be unchanged (in other words, the sentence that says "Exams 680, 685,
and 686 will still be required for the MCSA: Windows 7 certification" seems to be in error, or at least in contradiction with the main content of the page -- the "and" should be an "or").

Similar Messages

  • MCSA Windows Server 2012 Certification Exam prep

    I am studying for the MCSA Windows Server 2012 certification. I have looked at the books on amazon and would like your opinion on book selection. In the past I have found the self-pace exam prep books by microsoft to my liking. If you know of any
    web sites that contain information on how to prepare for the MCSA Windows Server 2012 certification that would great too. I think I am going to setup a lab using Windows Server 2012 R2 machines to assist my learning so information on that topic would be great.
    I am currently using Virtual Box to create virtual machines.

    Hi, I always liked the exam prep book from MS with hand-on lab. There is
    http://www.microsoftvirtualacademy.com/ from MS as well, could be a good place to check. I know too that @KeithMayer on twitter do post a lot of ressource too.
    I will move the thread to the learning section, as maybe other users got other ressource of value.
    Regards, Philippe
    Don't forget to mark as answer or vote as helpful to help identify good information. ( linkedin endorsement never hurt too :o) )
    Answer an interesting question ? Create a
    wiki article about it!

  • MCSA: Windows 7 to MCSA: Server 2012 (70-417)

    Hello,
    I currently have the 70-680 certification.
    I have read that the MCITP: Enterprise Desktop Support Technician on Windows 7 (70-680 + 70-685) will retire 31 januari.
    I have read that the MCITP: Enterprise Desktop Administrator on Windows 7 (70-680 + 70-686) will retire 31 januari.
    After 31 januari you will get MCSA: Windows 7 and before 31 januari also the other title.
    What is the easies way to upgrade to MCSA: Windows Server 2012?
    I have read that if you have MCITP: Enterprise Desktop Administrator on Windows 7 you can upgrade it by passing the 70-417 exam. Is this also possible with the MCSA: Windows 7 after 31 januari or with the MCITP: Enterprise Desktop Support Technician on
    Windows 7 before 31 januari.
    I hope someone can clear this out for me, i looked on the internet for it but i only can find an upgrade path from 70-680 + 686
    Kind regards,
    Ronald

    Hi, Ronald.
    Yes - all remaining MCITP certification titles will be retired on February 1st, 2014. On February 1st, no one can earn these titles any more. These certification titles will remain active on transcripts for people who earned them - just no longer
    attainable.
    IMPORTANT: Since you have already passed 70-680, if you pass 70-685 or 70-686 before February 1st, 2014, you will earn
    both the MCSA: Windows 7 and the associated
    MCITP title! If you pass 70-685 and 70-686 before February 1st, 2014, you will earn all three (3) certification titles. Learn more about the Desktop MCITP titles here:
    http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en-us/mcitp-certification.aspx#item-ID0EEAAAABCA
    Yes - you can upgrade to MCSA: Windows Server 2012 just by passing the 70-417 exam. However, you need to have already passed 70-686 before February 1st, 2014. If you look at the upgrade options on the following web page, it states that MCITP: Enterprise
    Desktop Administrator can be upgraded. However, not the MCITP: Enterprise Desktop Support Technician title! Think about it; a desktop administrator has more administrative responsibilities than a desktop support technician.
    http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en-us/mcsa-windows-server-certification.aspx#upgrade
    Yes - you will be able to take the 70-417 upgrade exam any time this year. This exam is not scheduled for retirement and there currently is no deadline for when you need to pass it. Remember, the whole purpose of this exam is to upgrade several different
    titles to MCSA: Windows 2012. If you think about it - if the upgrade didn't count after January 31, the exam would be completely worthless. You can verify which exams are being scheduled for retirement here:
    http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en-us/retired-certification-exams.aspx
    Good luck!
    Best wishes, Davin Mickelson

  • What are the exact requirements in order receive my MCSA: Windows 7?

    I'm just verifying the requirements for this particular certification

    Hi, Telinh.
    Assuming you haven't passed any other exams, you will to pass 70-680 and
    70-685.
    Here are the exam details. Under the Skills measured section of each exam, it lists everything you will be tested on:
    70-680,
    http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en-us/exam-70-680.aspx
    70-685,
    http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en-us/exam-70-685.aspx
    NOTE: If you have already passed exam 70-686, then you will not need to pass
    70-685.
    See more information (including upgrade paths) here:
    http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en-us/mcsa-windows-7-certification.aspx
    Microsoft Virtual Academy offers free training here:
    http://www.microsoftvirtualacademy.com
    As well, be sure to check out the free TechNet labs here:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/virtuallabs/default
    Good luck!
    Best wishes, Davin Mickelson

  • HT3986 My iMac becomes completely window system. How can I go back to Lion OS?

    My iMac becomes completely window system. How can I go back to Lion OS?

    Welcome to Apple Communities
    To use OS X Lion, go to Control Panel > System and Security > Boot Camp and select the Lion partition to boot, or press Option key in boot and select your OS X partition

  • Microsoft Word consistently becomes active window when clicking between dual screens and programs

    13" MBP
    2.3 ghz i5
    8GB Ram
    Running 10.9.2
    Microsoft Word 2011
    Dual screens with amazon Mini Display to VGA adapter
    When I am running word between an external monitor and my MBP, Microsoft word always interrupts any clicks between programs and between screens to become the active window. This is especially annoying when I am trying to navigate between MacMail and Chrome, or any other programs.
    The problem doesn't exist when I click between programs on the MBP, but only when I select windows between the two screens. Or programs on the external monitor.
    Word is up to date, as is my MBP.
    Please don't punt me to Microsoft, they're the worst!
    Thanks!

    There is a workaround for this problem, which was posted by Highestwater on the Microsoft Community thread for this bug and worked for me as well:
    Go to
    System Preferences > Mission Control >
    and UN-check the box labeled "Displays have separate Spaces" (see image below)
    The original poster on this thread may already be aware of this workaround, because he/she mentioned that the "separate Spaces" option is checked. But if you can live without the extra Mavericks dual display features (like going full screen in 1 display only, switching spaces independently on each display, and having a menu bar on each display), then uncheck this option and the "stealing focus" bug seems to disappear. For me the bug is so annoying that it's worth it to lose the extra features. Just yesterday I closed a Word document I was working on by mistake because I clicked on a Finder window on my other display and immediately pressed command-w to close it, without realizing that the focus had switched to my word document which closed instead. It was saved, but this sort of stuff interrupted my work enough to be both an annoyance and a time drain.

  • Why do my tabs become tiled windows without input from me? I have to double-click the tab to make the windows disappear, sometimes more than once. This is annoy

    This happens when I have several tabs. I'll click another tab and a tiled window appears with one window being the page of the tab and the other one the tab beside it. It's become quite annoying.

    Hello,
    In order to better assist you with your issue please provide us with a screenshot. If you need help to create a screenshot, please see [[How do I create a screenshot of my problem?]]
    Once you've done this, attach the saved screenshot file to your forum post by clicking the '''Browse...''' button below the ''Post your reply'' box. This will help us to visualize the problem.
    Thanks!
    Curtis

  • Why are new tabs becoming new windows when I open them?

    When I open a new tab (via a link or through Ctrl+T) and click on it while it's still loading, sometimes it will split from the others to become a new window. This is rather irritating. What could be causing this? Is it an option I'm missing or some feature I'm accidentally setting off?
    It happens most frequently when a tab is loading, but it doesn't have to be. For example, when I switched tabs to paste my Troubleshooting Information here, this tab split into a new window.

    Make sure that you do not drag a tab in the browser window.<br />
    Firefox 3.5 versions and later have a feature called tear-off tabs.<br />
    You can detach a tab from the current window and open it in a new window by dragging a tab in the browser window.<br />
    You can drag that tab back to the tab bar in the original window to undo that detaching.<br />

  • Labview Executable Becomes Unresponsive, Windows reports Insufficient Resources when trying to perform explorer tasks

    I have a test program that is utilizing the NI-9481 relay modules to switch power to a part and switch a Keithley 2000 DMM  to measure the voltage. This test needs to power on and off the part 3000x for 4 minutes on and 4 minutes off. I implemented this design using a state machine design pattern. The timing is done in one minute increments using the "Get Time/Date in seconds" function available with Labview 8.2. Each minute a measurement is taken and the data is writen to a text file. 
       -Measurements Algorithm:
          -Prior to anything, instrument is initialized with a reset, enters state machine loop 
          -Measurment Function, configures DC Volts and trigger, (relays switch), send trigger and read from instrument when SRQ is asserted
       -Switching Algorithm:
          -DAQmx Create task w/Auto cleanup(T)
          -DAQmx Create channel - Digital Output
          -Property Node for Channel - DO.Invert Lines = False
          -DAQmx Generate Digital 1D Data
          -DAQmx Write Data w/ Auto start(T)
    I have been working out the bugs with the devices we are communicating with and they appear to be working normally, however for the second time(yesterday was a DAQmx error) at cycle 131(17ish hours into the test) the program has become unresponsive and windows will not open the task manager and windows explorer reports "Insufficient system resources" when attempting to open a window. Labview is not reporting an error...
    Currently I suspect the while loop that is controlling the timing and am placing a WaitTillNextmsMultiple function in the loop set to 500.
    Also I wonder if the DAQmx sequence is consuming memory and eventually consumes all system resources. 
    If anyone has any ideas or knows of a problem with the devices I am using please help. Thanks
    -Nate
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    N8D11 wrote:
    I have a test program that is utilizing the NI-9481 relay modules to switch power to a part and switch a Keithley 2000 DMM  to measure the voltage. This test needs to power on and off the part 3000x for 4 minutes on and 4 minutes off. I implemented this design using a state machine design pattern. The timing is done in one minute increments using the "Get Time/Date in seconds" function available with Labview 8.2. Each minute a measurement is taken and the data is writen to a text file. 
       -Measurements Algorithm:
          -Prior to anything, instrument is initialized with a reset, enters state machine loop 
          -Measurment Function, configures DC Volts and trigger, (relays switch), send trigger and read from instrument when SRQ is asserted
       -Switching Algorithm:
          -DAQmx Create task w/Auto cleanup(T)
          -DAQmx Create channel - Digital Output
          -Property Node for Channel - DO.Invert Lines = False
          -DAQmx Generate Digital 1D Data
          -DAQmx Write Data w/ Auto start(T)
    I have been working out the bugs with the devices we are communicating with and they appear to be working normally, however for the second time(yesterday was a DAQmx error) at cycle 131(17ish hours into the test) the program has become unresponsive and windows will not open the task manager and windows explorer reports "Insufficient system resources" when attempting to open a window. Labview is not reporting an error...
    Currently I suspect the while loop that is controlling the timing and am placing a WaitTillNextmsMultiple function in the loop set to 500.
    Also I wonder if the DAQmx sequence is consuming memory and eventually consumes all system resources. 
    If anyone has any ideas or knows of a problem with the devices I am using please help. Thanks
    If the bolded stuff is happening repeatedly... you have answered your own question.
    LV will not destroy resources until it exits as part of its clean-up routine.
    Create tasks and allocate resource once when you start and re-use them until you are done, then detroy them.
    Ben
    Ben Rayner
    I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
    Rayner's Ridge is under construction

  • When the new version of MCSA window server will release?

    The Microsoft Certified Solutions Associate certification is the foundation for higher certifications and prerequisite for the Microsoft Certified Solutions Expert (MCSE).

    No one knows this answer except those at Apple.  If it hasnt been announced, no one else knows.

  • On Find the Alt-N to go to the next no longer works, if you become like windows which takes away good features at a whim then I will have to change browsers.

    Above is self explanatory, on "find" alt-n and alt-p was available, now it's not. WHY DO YOU CHANGE SOMETHING THAT WORKS PERFECTLY JUST TO GET SOME JOLLIES ??????

    Yes, I have the same problem. I am now forced to use the mouse to click on the up/down arrows next to the "FInd" text box to find previous or find next.
    Is there a way to enable these alt+N and alt+P shortcuts for the find feature?
    This is one of the basic browser functionality that I use a lot. Seems to be a very myopic design change to me. Why?

  • Upgrading PowerShell 2.0 to 3.0 on a Windows Server 2008 SP 2 Enterprise Certification Authority server

    Hello All:
    Are there any caveats to upgrading PowerShell 2.0 to 3.0 on a customer's Certification Authority server? The customer will also be upgrading to SCCM 2012  and employ this server as a Distribution Point.
    Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you.

    Hi Erik,
    I haven't tried to upgrade powershell on Certification Authority server, however, Windows Management Framework 3.0 requires Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0, and you need to change .NET version on server 2008 SP2.
    For more detailed installation instruction, please follow this article:
    Windows Management Framework 3.0
    If there is anything else regarding this issue, please feel free to post back.
    Best Regards,
    Anna Wang

  • Windows App Certification Toolkit fails on Certification requirements for Windows desktop apps Point 5.5

    Using the latest Version 3.4 of Windows App Certification Toolkit to check Windows 8.1 compatibility our Installer was not approved on:
    Certification requirements for Windows desktop apps
    5.5 Your app installer must create the correct registry entries to allow successful detection and uninstalls
    But all necessary settings are done and after the installation of our application we will find all settings in the registry.
    We use an MSI Installer embedded in a bootstrapper exe. The MSI Installer is made with the WiX Toolset V3.6.
    The same Application Installer got approved on November, 2014.
    We checked this issue against the latest version of MSThreatModelingToolkit installer which also was made with WiX toolset and it fails, too.
    So is there a higher restriction or do we miss anything?

    Hi Wibudev,
    I would suggest you to double check if you have miss something in registry, per documentation mentioned, the installation module must create the following registry entries during installation:
    DisplayName
    InstallLocation
    Publisher
    UninstallString
    VersionMajor or MajorVersion
    VersionMinor or MinorVersion
    WACK 3.4 is the latest version, I don't think there would be any higher restriction but I will recommend you to test with another computer to see if the validate fails again. Sometimes the issue could be on the PC environment.
    --James
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • W2012R2 - A certification chain processed correctly, but one of the CA certificates is not trusted by the policy provider.

    Hi all.
    I have stanalone offline RootCA, and enterprise domain SubCA on DC on Windows 2012 server. I have Windows 2003 Terminal Server, users logon to TS via smart cards - and this work fine.
    Now I added Windows server 2012 as "Terminal Server".
    Now I added Windows server 2012 R2 as "Terminal Server".
    I configured both servers identically.
    Users can logon via smart card to Windows Server 2012.
    Users CAN NOT logon via smart card to Windows Server 2012 R2.
     When user trying to logon via smart card, they have information:
    "An untrusted cartification authority was detected while processing the domain controller certificate used for authentication. Additional information..."
    I run a certutil.exe -scinfo on both Windows 2012/2012R2 servers.
    I found differences in the (~) same place in the output log.
    On Windows 2012:
    Exclude leaf cert:
       b4 44 8f fb fb b4 5f 03 39 76 dc cc e8 da 02 e0 d0 cc b6 32
     Full chain:
       c8 3d 07 12 ea 4d 0e 5a 8c 50 fc 56 2e 51 f1 68 6a 26 90 77
    Verified Issuance Policies: None
    Verified Application Policies:
         1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.2 Client Authentication
         1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.2 Smart Card Logon
     On Windows 2012 R2:
     Exclude leaf cert:
       78 7e 6c 60 3f 20 c6 f6 e8 74 c8 36 e3 d3 88 ac 12 60 41 32
     Full chain:
       b8 a9 fa 6c db 07 cd 32 86 17 8c 88 02 ba d0 4b 8c ac 2d 58
       Issuer: CN=XXX CA, OU=Certification Services, O=XX, C=XX
       NotBefore: 2013-11-22 12:42
       NotAfter: 2014-11-22 12:42
       Subject: CN=XX Test, OU=XX, OU=UXX, DC=XX, DC=com
       Serial: 7a0084f
       SubjectAltName: Other Name:Principal Name=XX@XX
       Template: Smartcard Logon Behalf 2048
       1d 2a bb dc 2a 9c 70 0d b5 35 47 44 ee 61 60 ab 71 97 66 ff
     A certification chain processed correctly, but one of the CA certificates is not trusted by the policy provider. 0x800b0112 (-2146762478)
    I run a certutil -verify xx.cer on both Servers 2012/2012R2 and on both servers have the ~exact same thing.
    Windows 2012:
    Exclude leaf cert:
       f6 0e 96 da c7 08 9a 78 12 97 a6 b6 22 df 57 9d e7 03 41 df
     Full chain:
       f0 fb 19 66 e8 6c 4f ea b4 d5 ea 6d 5e 38 54 07 b0 9f 52 96
    Verified Issuance Policies: None
    Verified Application Policies:
         1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.2 Smart Card Logon
         1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.2 Client Authentication
    Leaf certificate revocation check passed
    Windows 2012 R2:
    Exclude leaf cert:
       84 18 5b 9d 06 61 60 73 c6 37 80 f4 25 33 c4 d3 5e ef 4a 93
     Full chain:
       63 8e 9e 37 78 c9 93 bb 4d da f4 e3 4b 7e 2b 14 49 28 0f 5d
    Verified Issuance Policies: None
    Verified Application Policies:
         1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.2 Smart Card Logon
         1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.2 Client Authentication
    Leaf certificate revocation check passed
    Whether Windows 2012R2 is not trying to build a certificate path, treating smart card logon certificate as (Sub)CA certificate?
    Previous and probably wrong idea:
    The only thing that comes to my mind is my SubCA.
    I have two CA Certyficates:
    Certyficate #0 (expired)
    Certyficate #1 <- valid.
    I guess that all Windows before Windows 2012 R2 build certyficafion chain from valid (second #1) certyficate. Windows 2012 R2 take first and we have:
    "A certification chain processed correctly, but one of the CA certificates is not trusted by the policy provider.
    [ value]  800B0112 "
    This is a bug or feature?
    How I can fix this without removal Certificate #0 from my SubCA?
    Best regards
    Jacek Marek
    MCSA Windows Server 2012

    Hi,
    Glad to hear that the issue is solved!
    Thank you very much for your sharing!
    Please feel free to let us know if you encounter any issues in the future.
    Best Regards,
    Amy

  • A certification chain processed correctly, but one of the CA certificates is not trusted by the policy provider.

    Hi all.
    I have stanalone offline RootCA, and enterprise domain SubCA on DC on Windows 2012 server. I have Windows 2003 Terminal Server, users logon to TS via smart cards - and this work fine.
    Now I added Windows server 2012 as "Terminal Server".
    Now I added Windows server 2012 R2 as "Terminal Server".
    I configured both servers identically.
    Users can logon via smart card to Windows Server 2012.
    Users CAN NOT logon via smart card to Windows Server 2012 R2.
    When user trying to logon via smart card, they have information:
    "An untrusted cartification authority was detected while processing the domain controller certificate used for authentication. Additional information..."
    The only thing that comes to my mind is my SubCA.
    I have two CA Certyficates:
    Certyficate #0 (expired)
    Certyficate #1 <- valid.
    I guess that all Windows before Windows 2012 R2 build certyficafion chain from valid (second #1) certyficate. Windows 2012 R2 take first and we have:
    "A certification chain processed correctly, but one of the CA certificates is not trusted by the policy provider.
       [ value]  800B0112 "
    This is a bug or feature?
    How I can fix this without removal Certificate #0 from my SubCA?
    Best regards
    Jacek Marek
    MCSA Windows Server 2012

    Hi,
    I run a certutil.exe -scinfo on both Windows 2012/2012R2 servers.
    I found differences in the (~) same place in the output log.
    On Windows 2012:
    Exclude leaf cert:
      b4 44 8f fb fb b4 5f 03 39 76 dc cc e8 da 02 e0 d0 cc b6 32
    Full chain:
      c8 3d 07 12 ea 4d 0e 5a 8c 50 fc 56 2e 51 f1 68 6a 26 90 77
    Verified Issuance Policies: None
    Verified Application Policies:
        1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.2 Client Authentication
        1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.2 Smart Card Logon
    On Windows 2012 R2:
     Exclude leaf cert:
      78 7e 6c 60 3f 20 c6 f6 e8 74 c8 36 e3 d3 88 ac 12 60 41 32
    Full chain:
      b8 a9 fa 6c db 07 cd 32 86 17 8c 88 02 ba d0 4b 8c ac 2d 58
      Issuer: CN=XXX CA, OU=Certification Services, O=XX, C=XX
      NotBefore: 2013-11-22 12:42
      NotAfter: 2014-11-22 12:42
      Subject: CN=XX Test, OU=XX, OU=UXX, DC=XX, DC=com
      Serial: 7a0084f
      SubjectAltName: Other Name:Principal Name=XX@XX
      Template: Smartcard Logon Behalf 2048
      1d 2a bb dc 2a 9c 70 0d b5 35 47 44 ee 61 60 ab 71 97 66 ff
    A certification chain processed correctly, but one of the CA certificates is not trusted by the policy provider. 0x800b0112 (-2146762478)
    I run a certutil -verify xx.cer on both Servers 2012/2012R2 and on both servers have the ~exact same thing.
    Windows 2012:
    Exclude leaf cert:
      f6 0e 96 da c7 08 9a 78 12 97 a6 b6 22 df 57 9d e7 03 41 df
    Full chain:
      f0 fb 19 66 e8 6c 4f ea b4 d5 ea 6d 5e 38 54 07 b0 9f 52 96
    Verified Issuance Policies: None
    Verified Application Policies:
        1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.2 Smart Card Logon
        1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.2 Client Authentication
    Leaf certificate revocation check passed
    Windows 2012 R2:
    Exclude leaf cert:
      84 18 5b 9d 06 61 60 73 c6 37 80 f4 25 33 c4 d3 5e ef 4a 93
    Full chain:
      63 8e 9e 37 78 c9 93 bb 4d da f4 e3 4b 7e 2b 14 49 28 0f 5d
    Verified Issuance Policies: None
    Verified Application Policies:
        1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.2 Smart Card Logon
        1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.2 Client Authentication
    Leaf certificate revocation check passed
    Any idea, or I must open case with Microsoft support?
    Best regards
    Jacek Marek
    MCSA Windows Server 2012

Maybe you are looking for

  • Apex IR report with Heading label

    i have IR report with 15 column with heading.. The end user can accessing from different department, when the user can see the report shown only their particular department rows only. each department have different column value and Header label .how

  • How to set jdk1.6 path in Solaris Sparc 64-bit machine

    Hi All, I am very much new to Solaris and do not know whether this is the right place to put my question. Already jdk1.5 installed in the machine (it came with the Operating System.) I have installed the JDK 1.6 and set the path in .profle file as ex

  • Problem with barcode font in Forms9i

    I need urget help with the following matter: I'm using a barcode font to display a text item. In developer everything is ok, but when i run the form in the web browser, the barcode font is replaced with another normal font (arial i think)! I don't kn

  • Need correct cable to run from iMac to 32 inch Samsung Tv

    Can anyone tell me how I can view Netlix  on my tv after pulling it up on my imac ?  Any links would be appreciated,,,,,,,Thanks--Rick

  • Clients receiving updates but not reporting

    Hi All, I'm having an issue where all Windows 8.1 clients are downloading updates just not reporting back into my console. This seems to be happening since I upgraded to Windows Server 2012R2 (from 2008R2) and created a new WSUS implementation. The W