Chain two standar transactions

Hi Guys i need to chain two standar transactions F-48  with FBZ5, but not using Z programming. The problem is when in f-48 the user SAVE the document y need to call FBZ5 for print a check.   In F-48 i was search for user exits and i obtain this:
F050S001,F050S002,F050S003,F050S004,
F050S005,F050S006,F050S007,F180A001,
FARC0002,RFAVIS01,RFEPOS00,RFKORIEX,SAPLF051 
But when i search CALL CUSTOMER on SAPMF05A program, i not found nothing.
Please any tip for solve this problem
Thanks in andvance

hi
What ever u r telling is correct. But if it very urgent, u can try like this. You found some user exits right? So go to SMOD and give that exit name below select component radio button and press display button. You will get function module exits. If you have access, then go and give some small logic (any thing like c = a + b) inside the function module and put break point. Do for all exits like that and come back.
Once you completed above process in all exits then go to f-48 transaction give some inputs and press SAVE button. Check any function module where you wrote that small logic is triggering. If you find then you can use that function module for you purpose as i hope.
Reward if it dose.
Thanks
Siva Kumar

Similar Messages

  • Can I daisy chain two Thunderbolt displays to the new MacBook Airs (July 2011)?

    I have last year's MacBook Air -- probably the best Mac I've ever had and I've had a few. I looked at using multiple displays last year, but the reviews for the major 3rd-party solutions really demonstrate how little is possible.
    I see Apple says you can double up on displays for the MacBook Pro (I have a pre-Thunderbolt one unfortunately), what about the new (July 2011) MacBook Airs?
    Anyone tried? Anyone know?
    (I have a 30" Dell display, but it is, and always has been, very flakey when it comes to connecting to a Mac laptop).

    You can thank Intel for that.
    The sandy bridge chips all have integrated graphics, and before they were released -- they took nvidia to court claiming they didn't have a "license" to make GPU chipsets for the sandy bridge line.  Intel won, and consumers lost.
    The solution most manufacturers are using for notebooks is graphics switching (nvidia optimus like technology) -- which basically uses a discreet GPU along side the intel integrated GPU, and switches between the two instantaenously based on the workload and \ or battery life -- this is how the macbook pro's with the ATI gpus work.
    Since there isn't enough space physically inside a macbook air for a discreet GPU, and since no company in the world is allowed to make a shared GPU for intel's sandy bridge chipsets -- the only solution is to use the integrated graphics that is in the processors -- Intel HD 3000.  Intel basically has the monopoly here...there is no legal solution in the world another company can provide thanks to our wonderful court system
    Wanna know the really sad part about the Intel HD 3000 GPU?  The Nvidia 320M (the GPU used in the previous model 2010 macbook air -- chip was released to the market in April of last year) actually out performs it in some benchmarks -- that's right, a 1+ year old shared gpu from nvidia outperforms Intel's 2011 integrated graphics.
    Intel ***** at graphics, period.
    The only other solution I can think of is for you to get the "Echo Express" product from Sonnet:
    http://www.sonnettech.com/product/thunderbolt/index.html
    It's basically an external bay that will allow you to put a PCIe GPU inside it, and it would then connect via thunderbolt to the macbook air.
    You would then use the minidisplayport connectors on the PCIe GPU to connect to the apple displays -- I believe any modern ATI or Nvidia GPU can support up to 3 or 4 external displays.
    Unfortunately, sonnet's bay is not released yet, and you'd also have to make sure the PCIe GPU you get supports both thunderbolt AND os x....so yeah, kind of slim pickens right now
    EDIT:
    So apparently the macbook pros can daisy chain two thunderbolt displays -- Apple has a picture of it on their site:
    http://storeimages.apple.com/1867/as-images.apple.com/is/image/AppleInc/MC914_AV 7?wid=1200&hei=1200&fmt=jpeg&qlt=95&op_sharpen=0&resMode=bicub&op_usm=0.5,0.5,0, 0&iccEmbed=0&layer=comp
    I just bought a new mac air too...I was gonna get a mbpro but they are just too expensive -- the one I configured was at around 3000$
    Wanna know what's lame about using the thunderbolt display with the mac air?  So the new mac air has the magsafe connector on one side and the thunderbolt connector on the other -- they're not on the same side like the macbook pro is (see picture) -- so basically the cable is going to have to slack around the back of the macbook air -- who designed that?  Must have been smoking some good meth ;p
    Message was edited by: NiqueXyZ

  • Two call  transaction in Sigle Report

    Hello  Everybody ,
    Is it possible  to write BDC in baclground  for two call  transaction  for different  Tcode in a sigle  ABAP  Report  .
    Regards,
    Sandeep

    Hi,
    Yes it is possible. Populate the values on BDCDATA table and do the call transaction. Only thing to remeber is the document flow. It should not be dependent. I.e data created by the BDC on first transaction should not be required to post second transaction. In such cases you may face difficulty for the second call transaction.
    thanks,
    Vivekanand

  • Chaining two Extremes--which order? (part 2)

    Just reconfigured my home network after buying Cisco RVS4000 router and adding a second simultaneous dual-band AEBS. I followed Tesserax's advice in the previous thread (Chaining two Extremes--which order?) recently.
    The two db extremes are bridged and both use the same network name, passwords, and security levels.
    One odd behavior I can't figure out:
    When I eliminated the non-simultaneous db extreme from the chain and was resetting the existing sDB, it took on the profile of the extreme I eliminated from the chain. I have hard reset it several times, both manually and through the airport utility interface. Even though it says it resets, in the summary tab, it continues to indicate it is a (fast ethernet) model and not the (simultaneous dual-band) model. And the radio settings seem to mirror those of the older model.
    So, to summarize, hardware wise, I have two new simultaneous dual band extremes but airport utility indicates I only have one. The network appears to be working fine, but I'm wondering whether I'm getting the full functionality of the hardware.
    I don't know how to fix this.

    Couple of additional questions. Under your suggestion, what should the settings be under "wireless mode?" Assuming it would be:
    802.11n (non-dual)= "create a wireless network"
    802.11n (dual)= "extend a wireless network"
    Actually, you will want the following settings:
    o 802.11n (non-dual) = Create a wireless network
    o 802.11n (dual) = Create a wireless network
    The only reason to choose "Extend a wireless network" would be if the two routers were NOT connected by wire.
    Also, what about the checkboxes asking "Allow this network to be extended?" for each base station. Should they be checked or unchecked?
    You will want both "unchecked." Again, this would be because the routers are connected by Ethernet and this option is the "other half" of the "Allow this network to be extended"/"Extend a wireless network" pair to define a dynamic WDS. Neither are required (or desired) when the routers are connected by wire.
    The reason I was using WDS even though it was against my instinct is this paragraph from "Take Control" book by Glenn Fleishman ...
    Glenn provides an excellent reference in the Take Control series. I believe what Glenn is referring to here is in a situation where you had two AirPort connected by wire (like you do) and want to extend the wireless range even further. Using his instruction for your case would be if you wanted to add a third AirPort ... say an AirPort Express. You could then configure the 802.11n (dual) and Express into a dynamic WDS.
    Actually, in this case, it would be advantageous to switch the Extremes so that the dual would be connected to the modem and the WDS would be configured between the non-dual and Express.

  • Chaining two transactions

    Hi All,
            I have two transactions. I need to execute one after the other. But the first one dont through any export parameter and once the first transaction executed automatically the second transaction has to be run. I sit possible to run like this with out having any export parameters from the first transaction?
               I have created two separate scripts for running two transactions and for chaining them i hav e created third script but how can i get them executed one after the other?
    Thank you in advance
    Regards
    G.s.naidu

    >
    G.S. NAIDU wrote:
    > Hi All,
    >
    >         I have two transactions. I need to execute one after the other. But the first one dont through any export parameter and once the first transaction executed automatically the second transaction has to be run. I sit possible to run like this with out having any export parameters from the first transaction?
    >
    >            I have created two separate scripts for running two transactions and for chaining them i hav e created third script but how can i get them executed one after the other?
    >
    > Thank you in advance
    >
    > Regards
    > G.s.naidu
    Hi,
    In the third script,you have to do the following.
    Once you are in the command editor,you have to use the command REF from the pattern.
    We  have to use this command to call the test scripts as follows/in the order in which you want to execute.
    REF(SCRIPT A,SCRIPT A_1).
    REF(SCRIPT B,SCRIPT B_1).
    The next step is to parameterize the required fields in the third script(Parent script).
    When you execute the main script,it will execute in the pattern you want.
    hope this info help.
    Regards,
    SSN.

  • Chaining two transactions in eCATT

    Hi All,
    I have two transactions. I need to execute one after the other. But the first one dont through any export parameter and once the first transaction executed automatically the second transaction has to be run. I sit possible to run like this with out having any export parameters from the first transaction?
    I have created two separate scripts for running two transactions and for chaining them i hav e created third script but how can i get them executed one after the other?
    Thank you in advance
    Regards
    G.s.naidu

    Hi,
    take all the fields to internal table and then use like this.
    Loop at it_table to wa_table.
    *************for first Transaction
    perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPMP50A' '1000'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                                  '=INS'.
    perform bdc_transaction using 'TCODE'." first t code
    *****************for second transactions
    perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPMP50A' '1000'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                                  '=INS'.
    perform bdc_transaction using 'TCODE'." this t code is second one
    endloop.
    try this, i hope you can succeed.
    Regards,
    Arjun.
    Edited by: mallikarjuna goud on Dec 17, 2008 10:35 AM

  • Daisy chain two display port monitors (Dell U2913WM) to new Mac mini Thunderbolt?

    Everything I read said that I could hook up a display port monitor to a Thunderbolt port on the mac mini.  I purchased two display port monitors (Dell U2913WM) that can be daisy chained, and hooked them up.  All I get is mirroring.  Does anyone know how to turn off mirroring with this setup?  I did not get the "uncheck mirroring" option in preferences until I hooked up the second via the HDMI port instead of a daisy chain.  The problem with that is, I cannot take advantage of the full resolution through the HDMI.  It seems I have wasted my money on two monitors.
    Looking for advice on:
    1) How to daisy chain these two Dell monitors to the mac mini and turn off mirroring and use an extended desktop, or
    2) How to take advantage of the full resolution through HDMI port?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks!

    So re-reading this thread, I now realize you did exactly what I wanted to do but your issue was having a cloned vs. extended desktop. Oops!
    I believe your "nothing plugged in" issue is the cable. I'm not sure that TB cables are backwards compatible with DP - I think it's only the ports. Do you see multiple monitors in "System Preferences > Displays" if you hook the monitors up like you described in your OP?
    My Dell U2713H arrived today and it works like a charm with the supplied Mini-DP to DP cable. The built-in display on my 13" mid 2009 MBP still works if not in clamshell mode, although I will mostly use mine in my HengeDock. In the OSD of the monitor, you can access "Display Settings > Display Info" and it will show you the DP capability. Mine is only DP 1.1a and I believe to run 2 of these at full resolution you will need the bandwidth in DP 1.2 which includes MST (daisy-chaining). This could be your problem.
    Can you access the same menu in your OSD and report back what your DP compatability is?
    Thanks!
    mgb

  • Daisy chain two external drives via Firewire, then connect one via USB to the TC?

    Hi,
    I have two external drives that have both Firewire and USB ports. My 1st generation 500 gb Time Capsule (maybe all of them?) only has USB ports so up til now, I have connected one or the other drive via USB. (I've tried to connect both to a powered USB hub but one drive has problems showing up. At this point I only use the one drive that shows up and connect it directly with no hub to the Time Capsue.)
    My question is: Can I daisy chain the two drives via Firewire and then connect one of them (probably the one that has no problems connecting with USB) to the Time Capsule via USB?
    Second, somewhat-related problem...
    I don't know why one drive isn't connecting very well when directly connected to the Time Capsule. Both are Fantom drives. One is a 1TB, the one that has prblems connecting is a 250GB. I've tried connecting directly or through a powered hub. The 1B has no problems, the 250 gb won't show up most of the time and disconnects itself fairly quickly if it does connect. I've switched cables; that hasn't helped. The 1TB stays connected most of the time but sometimes it disconnects too. I suspect the Time Capsule just isn't able to deal with external drives so I don't puch it. It would be nice to be able to have both drives accessable through the TC though.
    Thanks for any help.
    Cheers,
    John

    Doing some experimentation, connecting the drives directly to the MBP:
    - Neither of the two drives Firewire daisy-chained and going through the powered USB hub connected to the MBP mount. I was using old aliases on desktop.*They don't show up on network otherwise. (Each drive self-mounts with both Firewire and USB direct connections.)
    *Even after making new aliases, neither drive will mount using their new aliases when directly connected (not through hub) with USB or Firewire (and Thunderbolt adapter.) That's weird.
    - Both the 240 gb and the 1TB drives going through powered hub connected to MBP mount by themselves.
    - Two drives daisy-chained via Firewire and one drive connected to the MBP via Firewire (and Thunderbolt adapter) self-mount. No surprise there but that doesn't help me as I want to have the drives further away from the MBP and connected to the Time Capsule, which doesn't have a Firewire port anyway...
    - All of the USB and the Firewire cables work as does the Thunderbolt adapter. I tested them.
    I wonder.... I have a Firewire to what appears to be an Ethernet connector. I wonder if that would be any good. I'm afraid to try it though...

  • Mac Mini 2009 - Can't daisy chain two FW800 drives

    I have two FW800 enclosures with 3.5-inch drives and external power.
    Each one mounts individually when connected to the Mini FW800 port but when I daisy-chain them the second one in the chain doesn't mount and is not seen by disk utility.
    Those enclosures use an Oxford UF934DSB chipset.
    What's ironic that I had a FW400 enclosure daisy chained to one FW800 enclosure until this afternoon and that daisy-chain worked fine.
    Somewhere on the net there was an article that the daisy-chaining had to be done in a certain sequence, ie Mac FW to top FW port on first external, then from bottom of first FW enclosure to top of second and so forth.
    I always though the FW ports were just wired in parallel.
    Well, this is interesting - since these new FW800 enclosures also have one FW400 port as well, I just connected the second one using the FW400 ports and now they both mount.
    But now the whole chain only runs at FW400 speeds.
    Anyone else come across this problem or better yet, what is the solution to get both daisy-chained FW800 drives to mount.
    The enclosures are Rosewell, the drive in each a 1.5 TB WD green.

    I don't think it has anything to do with the power supply.
    The two enclosures are identical and react (work or not) exactly the same when I interchange them or the FW cable.
    They also work flawlessly if I connect the second one using FW400 instead of FW800. Would just trying to get the enclosure to mount with FW800 draw more current than when mounting with FW400 to put the power brick over the edge? I doubt it.
    A few other things I'm going to try - I do this when I have a few extra minutes since I can't afford to spend my time on this continuously.
    1. See if there is a F'W update for the enclosure and/or the Oxford chip.
    2. Talk to the Oxford and enclosure support people
    3. Update to 10.6.4, I'm on 10.6.2 right now
    4. Do a bit more digging on the net to see how others got the FW800 daisy-chaining working.
    The two enclosures react the same when I try each one separately and also when I switch them around. Whatever the problem is, it affects both equally so it's not some defect on one of them.
    With the rest of the testing I have done, I'm now pretty sure it's a Mac software problem.
    Although I would have thought someone else would have this problem as well but I can't even find any discussion on daisy-chaining with this chipset when running OS 10.6.
    There is a 15-digit number in disk utility called connection ID.
    I assume that is the Firewire ID number that some threads I read refer to.
    That ID is the same for the two FW800 ports and the FW400 port on each enclosure but it's different for the two enclosures, so some conflict there is definitely not the issue.
    So far I couldn't find what the latest issue of firmware is for the Oxford chip set, but I copied all the information that comes up with the firewire hardware listing so when I find the information I can check it against the firmware issue on my two units.
    Now, another interesting tidbit - some people say they had to power up the enclosure a few times occasionally to get a single drive to mount.
    I never had that problem, a single FW800 drive always mounted right away, but I decided to try that with the daisy-chained drive.
    So I turned the power switch on that second drive off and then on again...and lo and behold - doesn't it mount now........
    But that is not the interesting tidbit........the tidbit is when I check back in the Mini Firewire hardware listing.
    Whereas before it showed all the expected detail with either drive when connected individually via FW800, now with both FW800 drives connected I get this:
    *FireWire Bus:*
    *Warning: Unable to list FireWire devices.*
    *Maximum Speed: Up to 800 Mb/sec*
    ....and oooops - both FW800 drives just disconnected by themselves.
    Sure seems to point to a Mac software issue.
    And if you google for "Warning: Unable to list FireWire devices." you get pages of hits - many on Leopard but also a fair share on SL.
    I updated the software to 10.6.4 - still the same problem.
    Daisy-chain with FW400 is fine, with FW800 the second drive in the chain - doesn't matter which one it is, won't mount.

  • Daisy chaining two Lacie Firewire 800 drives on a G%

    I've had one external drive working perfectly for months. Tried to daisy chain a second drive and can't get the second drive to register on my desktop. Support said to reboot. My system freezes upon shutting down. If I restart with the two connected, neither drives shows and my Eye TV shuts down. As soon as I disconnect the second drive, Eye TV works and the one drive appears. Any suggestions? Apple Care had none except purchasing a port that would handle firewire 800. How trustworthy would that be?

    I've tried daisychaining a new d2 Big Disk Extreme FW800 and a d2 FW800 drive on my G5's FW 800 bus. I can't copy files from one drive to the other without an Error -36 code. I CAN copy to and from the drives to the Mac at nice fast speeds with no errors. Both LaCie drives are updated to their latest firmware, respectively.
    The few times that I was able to copy a small folder from the d2 to the Big Disk, it took forever.
    As a result of this thread, I'm now awaiting the delivery of a Belkin FW800 3 port hub. I hope this will clear up this issue, as I need to be able to move data between the two drives (both of which passed their tests via Disk Utility, Drive Genius, and DiskWarrior in flying colors).
    I have noticed the older d2 FW800 has a lower firmware number than the Big Disk, however, the LaCie Update Tool reports that each drive is at its current appropriate firmware number. And yes, I ran the Update Tool independently on each drive, while the other was unmounted and unplugged.
    Any advice?

  • Process chain - Two source system issue

    Hi Experts,
    I face problem when i transport a process chain from BW DEV to Quality.
    I have two source systems in Quality ECI and EXS.EXS is a sandbox server(Source system) which we no longer use.
    When i transport the process chain from DEV to QA, i get two DTP's automatically added to Process chain in quality for two source systems ECI and EXS whereas i do not want the data to be loaded from EXS client.
    I checked the BW dev system, it has only one DTP in the process chain.
    Now I want to elminate the other DTP in the process chain in quality.
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Srini

    I Dont think so a DTP for EXS system has got created automatically when you transport the PC to QA (which actually doesn't exist in DEV).
    Please check you DEV system once again, there might a DTP from EXS system also.. other wise go the Release TR and then check the contents-->iif you find two DTP's there then it is there in the dev system..
    Any ways if you want to delete the other DTP from the PC in QA.. you can Delete it directly from the PC itself.. Goto change mode of the PC and then select the DTP which you want to delete-->then right click and hten Click on Remove Process -->then activate the PC..
    Note: You might have authorization to edit the PC in QA then only you will be able to do the changes..

  • How do I daisy chain two wireless routers?

    I have recently got a new wireless router from O2- Thomson router, "G"
    This is set up at main BT socket as primary wi-fi router.
    I wish to add two of my old routers as a daisy chain just to extend the range to those rooms where reception is poor.
    One is a Thomson speedtouch 576, other is a Sagem provided by Sky. Both are "G".
    help me with step by step instructions if you can please?
    Thanks in anticipation.
    Regards

    Welcome to the discussion area!
    Are you planning to connect all of your routers using ethernet cables? If yes, then you need to place the Thompson and Sagem devices into "bridge" mode. If no, then you need to contact support for Thompson and Sagem regarding your products.
    Since this is the discussion area for the AirPort Express, AirPort Extreme and Time Capsule, we will not able to provide you with any details about the configuration of Thompson or Sagem products.

  • Daisy chaining two TCs?

    I have an older 500GB TC and a new 500GB one. If I turn off the router part of the old one can I daisy chain it with the new one and have 1 TB of wireless Time Machine backup capability?

    Unfortunately, there is not a "seamless" or "automatic" way to do this.
    But yes, you can use one computer on the two Time Capsules, but you will have to manually tell your computer which device to use. Make sure that each Time Capsule has a different name.
    Let the current backups continue until TC#1 is close to full.
    Then, click System Preferences on the dock and choose Time Machine
    Click Change Disk
    Click TC#2 to highlight it
    Click Use for backups
    The downside here is that TC#2 will see your computer as a "new" device and it will do a complete backup of the computer and then incremental Time Machine backups after that.
    If you want to go back in time on TC#1, you will need to do the same reset mentioned above and select TC#1.
    Be sure to reset to TC#2 after you are done with TC#1.

  • Trading partner receiving two same transactions

    Hi B2B Gurus,
    Our scenario is Division people place the flat files to FTP folder, SOA picks the flat files from FTP and it transforms to EDI XML file and then it place the EDI XML to IP_OUT_QUEUE, B2B picks up the file and it transforms to native EDI and sends it to trading partner.
    But here issue is we are sending a single transaction to trading partner and they are receiving the same payload with different filename
    Ex: The file named - Penske_860_20110629_172354282965_20110629_132412042.dat (Interchange # 282965)
    Contains the same data as - emerson860_pp_out.110629132506.17334
    The file named - Penske_860_20110629_183428283017_20110629_143441592.dat (Interchange # 283017)
    Contains the same data as - emerson860_pp_out.110629143618.29885
    Could any one help us how to cross chek this and wat are the chances for this ...
    Regards
    Sam

    Hi Anuj,
    Is it that same TP is receiving one transaction twice or same transaction is being passed to two TP's
    ans:same TP is receiving one transaction twice with different filename with same payload.
    We are using 10G B2B.
    We are sending one transaction to tradaing partner and trading partner receving the same transactions twice with different file name and same payload.
    Anuj, I cross check the filename in the log file, i am able to find only one file name in it. (Penske_850)
    Is it possible that we sent one file and they are duplicating on theire side?
    Regardds
    sam

  • Can you daisy chain two Compact DAQ systems together?

    Greetings everyone,
    I have a signal conditioning application and I have been looking at the Compact DAQ Platform as a solution.
    I have a total of 16 TC's channels, a few DIO and a few Analog Out requirements.
    I can basicly meet these needs with a single cDAQ system but I would like to have room to expand more in the future.
    Does anyone know if it is possible daisy chain more than one cDAQ system together or if it woudl be very difficult to program and run two seperate DAQ systems from my computer.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Thomas

    alkaline3mc wrote:
    NI, the home of dead links.... 
    You probably noticed that these posts were written 9 years ago...
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

Maybe you are looking for