Challan material is different from material document----Message no. 8I572

Hi,
I am getting the following error in subcontracting process when reconciling through J1IFQ.
Challan material is different from material document----Message no. 8I572
After P.O. creation and issued the materials through 541 and created a subcontract challan 57f4 and G.R has been done when reconciling through J1IFQ i am getting the above mentioned error.
Thanks,
Kiran Bodla

Hi,
In spro --> taxon goods movemnt > indiac> business transaction --> subcontrcating --> maintain movement type grp
here miantain
0002     101
0002     542
0002     543     O
Hope help U !
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Similar Messages

  • Challan Material is Different from Material Document Message No. : 8I 572..

    Dear All,
    Good afternoon. In my company, after version upgrade from ECC5.0 to ECC6.0, facing one peculiar issue i.e in MIGO for subcontract order : When I enter challan number for reference in pop-up, We are getting the below error
    "Challan Material is Different from Material Document Message No. : 8I 572..."
    Creation of preliminary activites before migo in one user login and if i try migo for the same in same login, no errors reported. but if I do the MIGO from different user login, i have noticed with above error and vice versa.
    For this as a abaper, if I debug for trouble shooting from MIGO, no error noticed from any logins for the same activity.
    Kindly help us.
    Arunachalam S

    Dear Hema,
    Thanks for your reply.
    As you mentioned, every thing has been checked and found okey.
    The observation is with same authorization, User A can able to inward the sub-contracting material but User B coud'nt do so and noticed error of  "Challan Material is Different from Material Document Message No. : 8I 572.."
    Even thought,the input information for the both logins are same.
    have a nice day.
    Arunachalam S

  • Challan material is different  from material document

    Dear All,
       When i going to reconciliation of subcontracting challan on t-code J1IFQ
    *material document -MIGO  Number(which was created at the time of MIGO)*
    *Year-2009*
    when i feel the detail like
    year            challan no             Item
    2009           00000001
    it also show a warning message *material document MIGO  Number(which was created at the time of MIGO) 2009 is allocated a challan during GR**
    im getting a error message
    challan material is different  from material document
    Pls Guide me
    Thanks
      Amin
    Edited by: sekh amin on Jul 9, 2009 8:16 AM

    M also facing the same problem and getting the same error message.
    "Chalan material is different from material document"
    But when I checked material and challan, everything was OK.
    Can anyone guide me to solve the issue.
    Regards
    Edited by: sapsarang on Jul 13, 2009 8:14 AM

  • "challan material is different from material document " error in GR

    hi all..
    when i am trying to do GR with respect to challan that i have created its showing
    "challan material is different from material document "
    if i didn choose the option "Refer sub-con challan" and tried to post it shows dump error of
    "Exception condition "T681Z_MISSING" raised.".
    dont we get the values while creating sun con challan in J1IF01 ?
    can you suggest where i have missed the steps.
    Thanks
    r.Kannan.

    Whenever inwarding the material against the Sub contracting , challen no to be given, but can you tell , which version you r working,
    Its this problem continue for all the sub contracting & for only on login or many logins
    Regards,
    Suresh.P

  • Project stock - sub-contracting - Challan matl is different from matl doc

    Hi,
    We have sub-contracted with project stock ( Special stock  Q ) materials to SC vendor.
    While doing challan reconciliation with J1IFQ , we are getting the error
    " Challan material is different from material document"
    We are on ECC 6 support pack level 16.
    Please advise solution.
    Rgds,
    Manohar

    Number ranges maintained for 57FC 
    Ser Grp    No                  Year               From                     To            Current number
    01              01     2009     0000000001     0000099999               226
    11             01                          2009     0000000001     0000199999                  18
    Is there a problem in this number range. For normal sub-contracting , we did not face any problem so far.
    Please advise.
    Rgds,
    Manohar

  • ME59N error "Contract vendor X differs from vendor Y" message number 06 047

    Hello,
    has anyone of you idea what could be the reason for that we receive every now and then in automatic purchase order run in ME59N an error message for a purchase requsition "Contract vendor X differs from vendor Y"  message number 06 047
    Also the purchase requisition in error (red) is displayed in the list under vendor Y  even though agreement is for vendor X. In purchasing request agreement and fixed vendor X are displayed correctly.
    The error does not appear  in ME59N if we only select this one single purchase requistion.
    Hope for your help and thanks in advance for any contribution.
    Br
    TS
    Message was edited by: Jürgen L

    Hello,
    Yes, it seems like source is uncertain but cannot understand the reason because 20280 is only vendor for the material. For this same vendor there are three contracts where this material is included but only the latest one 4600000805 is valid.
    I checked contract partners, no reference to the 197790 vendor or neither is there in vendor masters for 20280
    and 197790.
    Is there any way to simulate how SAP selects the vendor in background? And as I said in the afternoon run there is no error anymore or if me59N run for this specific purchase requisition.
    Br
    TS

  • [help]why data on table (master ) different  from materialized view(slave)?

    We have had Oracle RAC 2 Groups (master and slave).
    We have created materialized from slave to master. and I have created materialized view log on master .
    When slave group job is broken a long time(12 Hrs). We refreshed job and runned job id.
    But I have found database on materialized view (slave) different from TABLE on master group. (m$log =0row)
    Please tell me how can we resolve Or because that problem is m$log

    Yes I do have a unique identifier on each record in the base table and therefore also in the MV.
    So now the Downstream application has to update some of its own database tables based on what is in the MV that I provide - just so I understand how would that work e.g.:
    1. MV gets refreshed from my base table every minute
    2. Some records are newly inserted and some simply updated
    and this is the part I don't understand (I might be missing something obvious)....
    3. Downstream application interrogates the MV every (say 1-2 minutes) and updates its own tables based on the data there.....but let's say MV contains 10,000 records and in the last minute 100 of those records have been updated and another 100 inserted - how will it know the 200 records it needs to pull?
    Thanks again

  • Material qty different from Sales Order to Invoice ex. qty 1 to qty 5

    Dear, Gurus
    I have 2 material types 98% are trading goods and 2%Service Material When I create invoice document with this order reference trading good materials are copying without a problem except the service material it is coming as qty 5 with the price of 5qty It needs to be 1 to 1.
    In trading goods material I am reference WBS element.
    In service material no reference to WBS element.
    In copy control item cat of sales to billing for service item find below details.
    TAD
    Copying requirements   002  Item/order-related
    Data VBRK/VBRP         003  Single invoice (This I had changed because without it I was getting invoice split with trading goods)
    Billing quantity     A
    Pos./neg. quantity   +
    Pricing type         G
    PricingExchRate type
    Price source
    Edited by: Muhammad Ali Lozada on Dec 30, 2010 2:02 PM

    I closed this issue by having the 003 invoice split and just creating a new Sales Order after this configuration was made. As oppose to working with already made sales order(old).

  • Portal 902. Uploaded document differs from downloaded document.

    We are currently trying to set-up a portlet, which would include items (documents, images etc.). The problem we faced in that process is related to portal's storing process. We uploaded a pdf-file (Java API Guide from otn.oracle.com) as a simple file. Then, attempting to open the same file from portal, we got different errors: "the file is damaged and could not be repaired", "error reading xref entry" etc. Since these errors refer to acrobat reader and browser conflict we turned that "open in browser" option off in Adobe Acrobat. After this, the situation did not improve. Still, it was possible to download the document from the portal as a file. We downloaded the file and made a binary comparison. The result was quite intereseting since the size of both (uploaded to portal and downloaded from portal) was the same (210 Kb) but the content was different. I will add also a excerpt from that downloaded file that differed from the initial file. How could we avoid similar problems in the future? Thank you.
    366 ;
    Font-Weight : Bold ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    Font-Family : Arial, Helvetica
    Font-Size : 10pt ;
    .PortletHeading2{
    Color : #003366 ;
    Font-Size : 9pt ;
    Font-Weight :
    Bold ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    Font-Family : Arial, Helvetica ;
    .PortletHeading3{
    Color
    : #003366 ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    Font-Weight : Bold ;
    Font-Family : Arial, Helvetica
    Font-Size : 8pt ;
    .PortletHeading4{
    Font-Weight : Bold ;
    Font-Size : 7pt ;
    Font-Family
    : Arial, Helvetica ;
    Color : #003366 ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    .PortletSubHeaderColor
    Background-Color : #CCCC99 ;
    .PortletSubHeaderLink{
    Font-Size : 8pt ;
    Font-Family :
    Arial, Helvetica ;
    Color : #003366 ;
    .PortletSubHeaderText{
    Color : #003366 ;
    Font-Family :
    Arial, Helvetica ;
    Font-Size : 10pt ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    Font-Weight : Bold ;
    PortletText1{
    Color : #000000 ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    Font-Size : 10pt ;
    Font-Family :
    Arial, Helvetica ;
    .PortletText2{
    Color : #000000 ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    Font-Size :
    9pt ;
    Font-Family : Arial, Helvetica ;
    .PortletText3{
    Color : #000000 ;
    Font-Size : 8pt ;
    Font-Family : Arial, Helvetica ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    .PortletText4
    Color : #000000 ;
    Font-Family : Arial, Helvetica ;
    Font-Size : 7pt ;
    Text-Decoration :
    none ;
    .RightCurve{
    .LeftSubTabid19siteid0{
    Background-Repeat : no-repeat
    Background-Position : left top ;
    Background-Image :
    url(http://192.168.87.111:7777/images/FFFFFFsl.gif) ;
    Background-Color : #336699
    Background-Attachment : scroll ;
    .LeftTabBgSlantid19siteid0{
    Background-Image :
    url(http://192.168.87.111:7777/images/FFFFFFtl.gif) ;

    I am having the exact same problem on 10.1.4. I have a pdf on my desktop which opens fine in Acrobat reader (v 7.0). I upload it to my portal page as a file and when I click on the link I get the "this file is damaged and cannot be repaired" message. I downloaded the portal version of the PDF and an extra 66 bytes had been added to it.
    I only get this in my live environment as the file uploaded OK in user test. I have uploaded other PDF files and they can be viewed OK.
    Has anyone come across and fixed this in the six years since the original post?
    Thanks,
    Steven.

  • Material Ledger Unit Of Measurement different from Material Master

    Dear Team,
    In my client, there is a difference between unit visible in CKM3N and MM03. The base unit of measurement in MM03 is MT. Other than that, there are some other units maintained (not M3) in additional data tab in material master. In CKM3N, the visible unit is M3. M3 is not present anywhere in MM03.
    Why would such unit flow in material ledger table? (CKMLPP has unit M3). Please advise.
    One more observation is that when there is some price change document in Material Ledger, the proper UoM (MT) is being captured. Only in the basic price determination structure visible unit for each head is M3. Please check the attached screen shot.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Jay Shah.

    Hi..
    Refer to Data Inconsistency of BUOM in Material Ledger Tables

  • GR cost different from material cost

    Hi,
    I have few scenario below and hope to get clarification.
    Below all correct?
    Base on standard cost
    1 MM03 $10 and purchase price is $8
       During GR it is debit stock $10 credit grc $8 and credit price diff of $2.
    2 MM03 $10 and puchase price is $12
       During GR it is debit stock $10, debit price diff $2 credit grc $12
    Base on MAP
    3 MM03 $10 and purchase price is $8
       During GR it is debit stock $8 credit grc $8
    4 MM03 $10 and puchase price is $12
       During GR it is debit stock $12 credit grc $12
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I have few scenario below and hope to get clarification.
    Below all correct?
    Base on standard cost
    1 MM03 $10 and purchase price is $8
    During GR it is debit stock $10 credit grc $8 and credit price diff of $2.
    2 MM03 $10 and puchase price is $12
    During GR it is debit stock $10, debit price diff $2 credit grc $12
    Base on MAP
    3 MM03 $10 and purchase price is $8
    During GR it is debit stock $8 credit grc $8
    4 MM03 $10 and puchase price is $12
    During GR it is debit stock $12 credit grc $12
    very correct no issue
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Billing Currency Differs from Sales Document

    Hi all
    I have a scenario where in the Sales document is having currency USD. At the time of creating the sales order the document currency is changed to EUR. Header condition is entered manually (FREIGHT) for which the currency is entered as EUR. Created the susequent documents delivery & billing. In billing the currency of the FREIGHT is coming in USD, other condition types are coming in EUR. Can anyone please help me in knowing why it is coming like this.
    Thanks & Regards
    Tarun

    Hi,
    Please check the currency maintained in the CONDITION RECORDS ofo FREIGHT in VK12
    May be the currency maintained was USD.
    Please check and return.
    regards,
    santosh

  • Auto message determination for Freight Vendor when different from main ven

    Hi All,
    We have an issue with auotmatic output determination of a purchase order for a freight vendor, when the freight vendor is different from material vendor.
    We are creating a PO for raw-material for vendor 'A'. In the same PO we are maintaining freight condition (FRA1/FRB1/FRC1) and for that condition we are maintinaing a different vendor (e.g Fedex). Now when we save the PO we want the system to output the PO via FAX to both the Vendors (without any manual intervention).
    How can we achieve this?
    Thanks in Advance
    Venkat

    Hi Rajesh,
    Thanks for your reply.
    as per my understanding, you mean to say that freight vendor has to be maintained as CR partner to the material vendor. If my understanding is correct, then the issue is that my client is not interested in maintaining Freight vendor as partner to the Material Vendor. And one more point to be noted is, most of the Purchase Orders are created automatically by MRP (Reorder point planning) . Freight vendor is maintained in the contract. MRP uses the contract as source and creates release orders.
    is there any way to create new access sequence for message type NEU.so that system access the table KONV and field LIFNR to find the freight vendor.
    As of now i am unable to find this table and field name in the field catalog for creating new condition table.
    looking forward to hear from you soon.
    Regards
    Venkat

  • How to Query the Formulation Spec from Material Spec?

    Hi,
    I'm trying to build a query that drives its data from the Trade Spec that links to the Material Spec and from Material to the related Formulated Spec.  I'm stuck trying to find the table that links between the Material Spec to the Formulated spec(Tab: "Related Spec"-> Section: "Produced By").  Can someone help me identify the tables I need?  I've gone through the DatabaseAndObjectSchema document for Agile PLM4P and have exhausted my resources.
    -- Here is a sample of my incomplete query
    select ms.specid,ms.specnumber,s.specid
              from agile.specsummary s,     -- Trade Spec
                   agile.gsmtradematerialspecrelation gts,  -- Link Trade to Material
                   agile.specsummary ms  -- Material Spec
             where s.specid = gts.fktradespec
               and gts.fkmaterialspec = ms.specid
    Thanks.
    Yoko

    Hi Yoko,
    In the schema document, you click on fkContext to find the formulation spec (and select the formulationSpecification table from the list of gsmBaseSpec implemented tables)
    Here is a query that includes joins to the formulationspec and materialspec tables, if needed.
    SELECT
      tradeS.SpecNumber, tradeS.SpecType, formS.SpecNumber, formS.SpecType, materialS.SpecNumber, materialS.SpecType, *
    FROM
      gsmBaseTradeSpec t1
      INNER JOIN gsmTradeMaterialSpecRelation relation ON t1.pkid = relation.fkTradeSpec
      INNER JOIN formulationSpecification form ON relation.fkContext = form.pkid
      inner join MaterialSpec mat on mat.pkid = relation.fkMaterialSpec
      inner join SpecSummary tradeS on tradeS.SpecID = t1.pkid
      inner join SpecSummary formS on formS.SpecID = form.pkid
      inner join SpecSummary materialS on materialS.SpecID = relation.fkMaterialSpec
    Here is a slimmer one that just joins against the spec summary tables:
    SELECT
      tradeS.SpecNumber, tradeS.SpecType, formS.SpecNumber, formS.SpecType, materialS.SpecNumber, materialS.SpecType, *
    FROM gsmBaseTradeSpec t1
      INNER JOIN gsmTradeMaterialSpecRelation relation ON t1.pkid = relation.fkTradeSpec
      inner join SpecSummary tradeS on tradeS.SpecID = t1.pkid -- trade's specsummary
      inner join SpecSummary formS on formS.SpecID = relation.fkContext --formulation's specsummary
      inner join SpecSummary materialS on materialS.SpecID = relation.fkMaterialSpec -- material's spec summary
    Hope this helps,
    Ron

  • Material creating from option COPY FROM MATERIAL thru MM01

    Hi All,
    According to the requirement..I have to create a New Material through "Copy from material"  option given in the MM01, In which it should not accept the already present OLD Material No( BISMT )  i.e. it should generate an error msg to avoid the duplication of BISMT value to the current Mat no created.
    Hope my question makes a clear understandmnt of my problem......
    points will be rewarded.......pls help me ASAP........
    Thanking you,
    Santosh...

    you can put a check in exit - EXIT_SAPLMG02_002.
    the syntax is like this
    SELECT BISMT up to 1 rows
    into  l_bismt
    where bismt = MATNR.
    endselect.
    if sy-subrc eq 0.
    message e000(oo) with 'Material number already exists'.
    endif.
    Hope it solves ur problem.

Maybe you are looking for