Challenged: Big query question

Here is a sample of data I have for a table with four columns (id,status,start_date,end_date)
What I need to do is to get difference of the start dates of the maximum available dates, if data is valid. The pseducode is as follows:
IF end_date of New status is null
THEN return null
ELSE
IF start_date of old >= start_date of new
THEN return (start_date of old - start_date of new)
ELSE return null
I used the following query but always return the bold null
select id,
(case when max(end_date) keep (dense_rank last order by decode(status,'new',1,0),start_date) is null then
null
else
          (case when max(decode(status,'old',start_date,null)) >=
          max(decode(status,'new',start_date,null))
          then max(decode(status,'old',start_date,null)) - max(decode(status,'new',start_date,null))
else
null
end)
end) result
from tbl where id =1
Based on the below sample, I expected to get the following result; 14-Mar-07 - 16-Feb-07 which is the difference of the maximum start_dates of the two statuses. However the query is not working.. Please help me.. Thank you..
Id Status start_date end_date
1 new 03-Feb-07 07-Feb-07
1 new 16-Feb-07 21-Feb-07
1 old '10-Mar-07 12-Mar-07
1 old '14-Mar-07 16-Mar-07

Is it this you were looking for
select id, status, start_date, end_date, lag_start_date
from (
select id,
status,
start_date,
decode(status, 'new', null, end_date) end_date,
lag(start_date) over (order by start_date) lag_start_date
from test)
where lag_start_date <= start_date ;
ID STA START_DAT END_DATE LAG_START
1 new 16-Feb-07 03-Feb-07
1 old 10-Mar-07 12-Mar-07 16-Feb-07
1 old 14-Mar-07 16-Mar-07 10-Mar-07

Similar Messages

  • Big query Performance

    Hi All,
    I'm working on Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bi
    I have a big query with many aggregate functions with group by clause.
    Will it give good if the split the same into multiple queries.
    Please give some ideas
    Thanks in advance.
    Sree

    sree wrote:
    I have a big query with many aggregate functions with group by clause.
    Will it give good if the split the same into multiple queries.Besides the fact that you are not providing any details for a proper answer - splitting a single query into multiple queries is seldom a good idea.
    Basic principle. It is better for a single "big" query to read a million rows, than for 10 "smaller" queries to each read a million rows. The I/O performance to read a million rows is a lot faster than having to read million rows 10 times.
    So in order to make that "biq" million row query faster, one can look at parallel processing. Instead of using a single process to read a million rows, using 10 parallel processes to each read a 100,000 rows of that total one million.
    The bottom line is that you either need to make the workload less - change the big query/data model/logic so that instead of having to read a million rows to get the answer, only 10,000 rows need to be read. If that is no possible, then you need to look at parallel processing, break that million row workload into smaller workloads, and use parallel processing to move these smaller workloads simultaneously.

  • Big Query to XLS - Freeze the program

    Hi everybody!
    I have to export to an XLS file a big Query with more than 100.000 rows... When I do that, the program starts to export, but when pass more than 70.000 rows the program freeze and dont respond anymore...
    Is this a bug of the version?
    About the system:
    Windows XP 32 Bits
    Intel Core 2 4300
    1 Gb DDR2
    Sql Developer:
    Oracle IDE     2.1.1.64.45
    Plataforma Java(TM)     1.6.0_11
    Soporte de Control de Versiones     2.1.1.64.45
    Best regards.
    Edited by: user4300570 on Dec 17, 2010 7:19 AM

    Not justifying the freeze, but Excel's last row is 65536, so any result set greater than that wouldn't fit anyway.
    You could request spanning over multiple Excel sheets at the SQL Developer Exchange though, so other users can vote and add weight for possible future implementation.
    Regards,
    K.

  • Simple Query Question - How do I return the Last 3 records of a Table?

    Question.
    For example, I have a table that has 50 records.
    How do I, specify in SQL to only return the last 3 records of the table.
    Select a.* from table a where ????

    I was just trying to show an example to a friend on
    how something like this would work and if it was even possible. But it won't work. Here's a simple example:
    SQL> create table emp
      2  (id)
      3  as
      4  select object_id
      5  from   all_objects
      6  order  by object_id;
    Table created.
    SQL> select *
      2  from  (select rownum rn
      3               ,b.*
      4         from   emp b)
      5  where  rn > ( select (max(rownum) - 3)
      6                from    emp)
      7  ;
            RN         ID
         40830      55891
         40831      55892
         40832      55893So far, so good. These are the "last 3" rows inserted. Now delete a bunch of rows and insert 3 new ones:
    SQL> delete emp where id < 40000;
    33423 rows deleted.
    SQL> commit;
    Commit complete.
    SQL> insert into emp values (60000);
    1 row created.
    SQL> insert into emp values (60001);
    1 row created.
    SQL> insert into emp values (60002);
    1 row created.
    SQL> commit;
    Commit complete.
    SQL> select *
      2  from  (select rownum rn
      3               ,b.*
      4         from   emp b)
      5  where  rn > ( select (max(rownum) - 3)
      6                from    emp)
      7  ;
            RN         ID
          7410      55891
          7411      55892
          7412      55893Here's the problem. Even though the "last 3 rows" are 60000 - 60002, I still get the same ones as the first query.

  • Oracle 10g and parallel query question

    Hi Oracle on SAP Gurus!
    We are currently thinking of activating parallel query for certain segments (large application tables and indexes). We searched in SAPNet and SDN and have also studied the SAP Note 651060. But we did not find a complete answer to the following question which is very important for us:
    Which kinds of queries (despite from full table scan and index scan in partitioned indexes) support parallel queries and which ones do not support parallel queries?
    This is important for us to find out whether we have candidates for parallel queries or not.
    Thanx for any hint!
    Regards,
    Volker

    But why do you not propose to use parallel query in OLTP systems?
    If the queries are accessed very frequently you will just run out of cpu and io ressources. OLTP systems are (historical) typically multi user systems. You can off course use PQ for 'single user' activities, like index rebuilds, some batchjobs, but you shouldn't do for frequent user queries.
    If you have time look at this interesting Article [Suck It Dry - Tuning Parallel Execution|http://doug.burns.tripod.com/px.html]
    It is quite old, and you don't have to read all tech details, but i recommend having a look at the conclusions at the end.
    May it make sense to use partitioning of these tables in conjunction with parallel query?
    I know some guys, who do partitioning on OLTP systems, even SAP systems. But they don't use PQ then. The use partitioning to work on a smaller set of data. In your case the range scans, would need to scan only one partition, saving buffer cache and effectively speeding up execution. So you don't need PQ to scan all partitions at all, this would be a typical OLAP approach.
    Best regards
    Michael

  • Query Question: Sum of master and monthly table data

    Hi All,
    I have two tables that store financial data about programs. The PROGRAM table has the following columns (for purposes of this discussion):
    ID, INITIAL_BUDGET, COST_CENTER
    The PROGRAM_MONTHLY table has the following (abbreviated list of) columns:
    ID, PROGRAM_ID (FK to PROGRAM.ID), CURRENT_FORECAST, RECORD_DATE
    Every month, a copy of the program_monthly records for last month is made to new records in the PROGRAM_MONTHLY table and we use RECORD_DATE for our filters and comparisons. This way we have historical data, plus current month data that can be updated by our financial systems and program managers.
    I am using Application Express and would like to create a dashboard chart that shows the summary of the INITIAL_BUDGET and the CURRENT_FORECAST for a selected month. Obviously, the INITAL_BUDGET doesn't change, but the CURRENT_FORECAST (and similar columns such as the amount committed to purchase orders, which were omitted to simplify the discussion) change monthly.
    My goal is to create a chart that can display the initial budget, current forecast, amount committed on purchase orders, etc. for all cost centers, or just one at a time as the user requires, that is filtered by the month of the PROJECT_MONTHLY record. If I can come up with the statement for a view or query, then I can manage the rest.
    The required syntax for the chart is "SELECT link, label, value FROM...", where "link" can be NULL, since is it an optional link to another URL. The "label" and "value" portion are the important parts.
    For example, I have another chart that shows the project status (which is a Varchar 2 constrained to values such as, Active, On-Hold, Completed, etc.) with the status as the label and the count of the rows as the value. It starts:
    select null link, pjm.PROJECT_STATUS label, COUNT(pjm.ID) value FROM ... However, I have been unable to come up with a query that generates the desired results for these PROGRAM and PROGRAM_MONTHLY tables. I have played with various types of joins and sub-queries, but my SQL just isn't up to the challenge yet. I realize that I might have to re-work the table structure to accomodate this requirement.
    I would greatly appreciate any guidance in approaching this problem.
    Many thanks for your time and help,
    Petie

    Certainly, Warren, thanks so much for your willingness to look at my problem.
    To keep things simple, I will put the fundamentals of the tables with sample data. Please let me know if you would like more and I would be happy to provide it.
    Table: PROGRAM
    ID   PROGRAM_NUMBER   INITIAL_BUDGET   COST_CENTER
    1   10001            100000           500-001
    2   10002            125000           500-001
    3   10003            150000           500-002
    4   10004            175000           500-002
    5   10005             10000           500-003
    6   10006            200000           500-004Table: PROGRAM_MONTHLY
    ID   PROGRAM_ID   CURRENT_FORECAST  RECORD_DATE
    1    1            95000            02-FEB-06
    2    2           125000            02-FEB-06
    3    3           145000            02-FEB-06
    4    4           180000            02-FEB-06
    5    5             9000            02-FEB-06
    6    6           225000            02-FEB-06
    7    1            97500            02-MAR-06
    8    2           120000            02-MAR-06
    9    3           145000            02-MAR-06
    10    4           185000            02-MAR-06
    11    5            10000            02-MAR-06
    12    6           215000            02-MAR-06
    Report Example 1
    When a user would like to see the current summary data for all cost centers, they would see a chart with the following data:
    INIT_BUDGET  CURRENT_FORECAST
    760000       772500
    Report Example 2
    When a user would like to see the summary data for all cost centers for last month, they would see a chart with the following data:
    INIT_BUDGET  CURRENT_FORECAST
    760000       779000
    Report Example 3
    When a user would like to see the current summary data for cost center 500-001, they would see a chart with this following data:
    INIT_BUDGET  CURRENT_FORECAST
    225000       220000I hope this better illustrates the solution I seek.
    Thank you again for your time and assistance
    Petie

  • General JPA query question

    Hello world,
    I'm new to JPA 2.0 and there are few things I don't understand.
    BTW: I can't figure out the keywords to search for this question, so please pardon me if it's one of the most asked.
    Using the Preview, I've seen that alignment went straight to Hell, so I tried to make this as readable as I could using pipes in place of white spaces in the result sets.
    I have a couple of tables:
    CUST table (for customers):
    CUST_ID (pk, integer)
    CUST_NAME (varchar)
    ORD table (for orders):
    ORD_ID (pk, integer)
    ORD_STATUS (char) can be: N for new, S for shipped, D for delivered
    CUST_ID (fk, integer)
    The relationship is, of course, a "one to many" (every customer can place many orders).
    Content of the tables:
    CUST_ID|CUST_NAME
    1|elcaro
    2|tfosorcim
    3|elppa
    ORD_ID|ORD_STATUS|CUST_ID
    2|N|1
    3|N|1
    4|N|1
    5|S|1
    6|S|1
    7|D|1
    8|D|1
    9|D|1
    10|D|2
    11|N|2
    12|S|3
    13|S|3
    Here's how I annotated my classes:
    Customer.java:
    @Entity(name = "Customer")
    @Table(name = "CUST")
    public class Customer implements Serializable
    private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
    @Id
    @Column(name = "CUST_ID")
    private Integer id;
    @Column(name = "CUST_NAME")
    private String name;
    @OneToMany(mappedBy = "customer")
    private List<Order> orders;
    // Default constructor, getters and setters (no annotations on these)
    Order.java:
    @Entity(name = "Order")
    @Table(name = "ORD")
    public class Order implements Serializable
    private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
    @Id
    @Column(name = "ORD_ID")
    private Integer id;
    @Column(name = "ORD_STATUS")
    private Character status;
    @ManyToOne
    @JoinColumns
    @JoinColumn(name = "CUST_ID", referencedColumnName = "CUST_ID")
    private Customer customer;
    // Default constructor, getters and setters (no annotations on these)
    Everything works just fine, the following JPQL query yields the results I expected:
    select c from Customer c
    it returns three objects of type Customer, each of which contains the orders that belong to that customer.
    But now, I want to extract the list of customers that have orders in status 'N', along with the associated orders (only the status 'N' orders, of course).
    Back in the good ol' days I would have written an SQL query like this:
    select c.cust_id, c.cust_name, o.ord_id, o.ord_status
    from cust c
    inner join ord o on (o.cust_id = c.cust_id)
    where o.ord_status = 'N'
    and it would have returned the following result set:
    CUST_ID|CUST_NAME|ORD_ID|ORD_STATUS
    1|elcaro|2|N
    1|elcaro|3|N
    1|elcaro|4|N
    2|tfosorcim|11|N
    The following JPQL query, however, doesn't yield the expected results:
    select distinct c from Customer c join c.orders o where o.status = 'N'
    it returns the correct set of customers (customer 'elppa' doesn't have any status 'N' order and is correctly excluded), but each customer contains the full set of orders, regardless of the status.
    It seems that the 'where' clause is only evaluated to determine which set of customers has to be extracted and then the persistence provider starts to navigate the relationship to extract the full set of orders.
    Thinking a little about it, I must admit that it makes sense.
    I then tried out another JPQL query:
    select c, o from Customer c join c.orders o where o.status = 'N'
    this JPA query yields results that are similar to the ones produced by the previous SQL query: each result (4 results as expected) is a 2-object array, the first object is of type Customer and the second object is of type Order. But, again, the objects of type Customer contain the full set of related orders (as I expected, this time). Not to mention the fact that now the orders are not contained in the Customer objects, but are returned separately, just as in an SQL result set.
    Now the question is:
    Is it possible to write a JPA query that filters out, not only the customers that don't have an order in status 'N', but the related orders (fetched during relationship navigation) that are not in status 'N' as well?
    What I'd like to be able to get is a 2-customer result where each customer contains only its status 'N' orders.
    I read the Java EE 6 Tutorial and one of the examples (the Order Application) has a schema that is similar to mine, but I couldn't find a query like this (in the downloaded source code).
    Although I think the above is standard behavior, I use an Oracle Weblogic 12c server (through its Eclipse adapter) and the persistence provider appears to be EclipseLink.
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Stefano
    Edited by: user11265230 on 17-apr-2012 14.11

    Hello,
    When returning an entity from JPQL, it gives you the entity as it is in the database. Your "select distinct c from Customer c join c.orders o where o.status = 'N'" is asking for all customers that have an order with a status of 'N', so that is what it gives you. There is no condition to filter anything on the relationship when building the Customer object in JPA - doing so would mean returning a managed entity that does not reflect what is in the database. This would affect other queries, since JPA requires that queries return the same instance of an entity regardless of the query that is used to bring it back. So a query using your "where o.status = 'N'" would cause conflicting results when used with a query using "where o.status = 'Y'". And these queries would make the EntityManager unable to determine what has changed on the returned objects.
    EclipseLink does have the ability to filter over relationships, it is just not available through standard JPA and I would strongly discourage it. Instead of querying for Customers, why not change the query to get Orders instead -
    "select o from Customer c join c.orders o where o.status = 'N'". Assuming Orders have a ManyToOne back reference to their Customer, this will mean you do not need to travers the Customer-> order relationship. If using
    "select c, o from Customer c join c.orders o where o.status = 'N'"
    I am not sure why you would use the orders from the returned customers instead of the orders returned in the results though.
    You could also return "select c.id, c.name, o.id, o.status from Customer c join c.orders o where o.status = 'N'" which is the equivalent of what you would get from the SQL you initially posted.
    Regards,
    Chris

  • Left Join Query Question

    Version 10.2.0.4.0
    I have a question on the expected behavior of the query below.
    When I run the query below with the constraint on t1.partid = 789,  I get the query result t2.Indicator showing "SPECIAL" as expected.
    However, if I remove the constraint, and return all orders and parts, for the "789" part, the Indicator column is null.
    select t1.orderid, t1.partid, t2.Indicator
    from Orders a left outer join
    select partid, 'SPECIAL' as Indicator
    from vendors
    where vendorname like '%ABC%'
    ) t2
    on t1.partid = t2.partid
    where t1.partid = '789'
    I can address the issue with a case statement (below) or likely restructuring into a better statement. 
    But I'm just curious if this is expected or if there is some SQL rule being violated in the first example.
    I tried to search for this to see if it was already addressed but didn't have much luck.
    This works:
    select t1.orderid, t1.partid,
    case when t1.partid is not null then "SPECIAL" else null end as Indicator
    from Orders a left outer join
    select partid, 'SPECIAL' as Indicator
    from vendors
    where vendorname like '%ABC%'
    ) t2
    on t1.partid = t2.partid

    Sorry, it's been a while since I posted and should have read the rules.  And I didn't properly reference the alias.  So Post #1 was bad. 
    When I mockup a small set of data (shown below), I don't get the error.  The original query actually joins to a few other (seemingly) irrelevant tables and I tried to simplify it here  So I guess if I can't replicate it, then there might not be much assistance that can be provided.
    This was more of a curiousity than anything else to see if perhaps someone came across this before.
    For what it's worth:
    create table t1 (orderid number,
                 partid varchar2(20)
    create table t2
            (vendorid varchar2(20),
             partid varchar2(20)
    insert into t1 values(1, '123');
    insert into t1 values(2, '456');
    insert into t1 values(3, '789');
    insert into t2 values ('ABC','789');
    insert into t2 values ('DEF','123');
    insert into t2 values ('EFG','456');
    insert into t2 values ('ABC','7891');
    insert into t2 values ('DEF','1231');
    insert into t2 values ('EFG','4561');
    select t1.orderid, t1.partid, t2.Indicator
    from t1 left outer join
    select partid, 'SPECIAL' as Indicator
    from t2
    where vendorid like '%ABC%'
    ) t2
    on t1.partid = t2.partid
    the query that gives unexpected behavior is (although I can't replicate on this simplified version):
    select t1.orderid, t1.partid, t2.Indicator
    from t1 left outer join
    select partid, 'SPECIAL' as Indicator
    from t2
    where vendorid like '%ABC%'
    ) t2
    on t1.partid = t2.partid

  • SQL Query Question

    Hi,
    I am trying to filter my output from the query based on some conditions but not able to figure out how. May be I am just overlooking at the issue or is it something tricky.
    So, I have a query returning 4 rows of output out of which I need to filter the rows. I have created a table from the result of the query that I need to filter to make it simple. So below is my create table script and values that are obtained from my original query.
    CREATE TABLE TEMPACCT
      SOURCEKEY           NUMBER,
      FLAG                VARCHAR2(1),
      ITEMID              NUMBER(9)                 ,
      ITEMNAME            VARCHAR2(10)               ,
      ITEMKEY             NUMBER(9)                
    Insert into tempacct values (0, 'N', 100, 'ITEM1' , 9647);
    Insert into tempacct values (0, 'N', 200, 'ITEM2' , 9648);
    Insert into tempacct values (9648, 'N', 100, 'ITEM3' , 9813);
    Insert into tempacct values (9647, 'Y', 100, 'ITEM4' , 9812);
    SQL> select * from tempacct;
    SOURCEKEY F     ITEMID ITEMNAME      ITEMKEY
             0 N        100 ITEM1            9647
             0 N        200 ITEM2            9648
          9648 N        100 ITEM3            9813
          9647 Y        100 ITEM4            9812
    SQL> Tempacct table is the table created from the resultset of my original query.
    So from the above output, what I need is 3 rows. The logic to filter out the row is - If any of the row thathas sourcekey that is same as Itemkey in any of the 4 rows and flag is Y then remove the row which have flag =N and only display the one with Falg = Y.
    Ok, so, in this case the desired output would be
    SOURCEKEY F     ITEMID ITEMNAME      ITEMKEY
             0 N        200 ITEM2            9648
          9648 N        100 ITEM3            9813
          9647 Y        100 ITEM4            9812So here we compared between the first row and the fourth row, and since the sourcekey in fourth row is same as itemkey in first row and Flag is 'Y' for fourth row, we keep 4th row and remove the first row since the flag is 'N'. (and sourcekey is 0. the row that gets removed will always have sourcekey =0) .
    SQL> select * from v$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    CORE    10.2.0.4.0      Production
    TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - ProductionAppreciate your help.

    Hi,
    ARIZ wrote:
    Although the original question is already been answered, I had another small modification to the same question and also seeking some clarification. I do not want to open a new thread just for a similar question.I think you'll get better replies faster if you do start a new thread.
    Not counting this one, there have been 13 replies to this thread. Not many people who havn't already been participating in this thread are going to start reading a thread with 13 replies. Those who do are going to waste a lot of time reading about issues that have already been resolved, and the are likely to understand the remaining issues incorrectly.
    I have been following the thread from the beginnning, and I'm starting to get confused about what the unresolved issues are.
    I believe there are two things you still need:
    (1) An explanation of the solution I posted yesterday, involving the analytic COUNT function.
    (2) A solution for a new problem involving the same tables
    If I got that wrong, start a new thread, asking just what you need to know. Copy any relevant parts (like the CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements) from this thread. You can include a link to this thread, but do your best to make sure people don't have to use it.
    I realize that's more work for you, but getting the best results, and getting them quickly, sometimes does require more work.
    <h2>(1) An explanation of the solution I posted yesterday, involving the analytic COUNT function.</h2>
    ARIZ wrote:
    Hi Frank,
    Just out of curiosity, I was trying to understand the Count analytical function that you have used in the solution.
                    COUNT ( CASE
                                 WHEN  ac.flag = 'Y'
                           THEN  1
                             END
                        ) OVER ( PARTITION BY  CASE
                                                   WHEN  sourcekey = 0
                                       THEN  acctkey
                                       ELSE  sourcekey
                                               END
                                  )     AS y_cntSo what I am thinking is, this would first partition the row with acctkey ( where sourcekey =0) and sourcekey and then within that partition, it will check whether ac.flag = Y or not, if it is 'Y' then it would return count as 1 else 0. Am I correct? In the mean time I am also reading the tutorials on Count() analytical query. I'm not sure I understand your explanation.
    This is not partitioning first by x, and then by y. There is only one expression in the PARTITION BY clause. Most often, a PARTITION BY clause refers to some column in the table, for example:
    SELECT  ename
    ,       job
    ,       sal
    ,       AVG (sal) OVER (PARTITION BY job)  AS avg_sal_for_job
    FROM    scott.emp;This divides the result set into mutually exclusive parts; there will be as many such parts as there are distinct values for the PARTITION BY column. In the simple query above, if there happen to be 5 different values for job, you will get 5 independent averages.
    In your problem, there is no one column that defines a partition. That is, these two rows belong to the same partition:
    . SOURCEKEY F   ACCTKEY
             0 N       9647
          9647 Y       9812even though none of the 3 columns are the same. We could create a view that had a single column, telling to which partition each row belonged, like this:
    . SOURCEKEY F   ACCTKEY PART_NUM
             0 N       9648     9648
             0 N       9647         9647
          9648 N       9813         9648
          9647 Y       9812         9647where part_num is the result of a CASE expression:
    CASE
        WHEN  sourcekey = 0
        THEN  acctkey
        ELSE  sourcekey
    ENDWe could then use that new column, part_num, in a (very simple) PARTITION BY clause. But there is no need to create a view, even an in-line view, for that: we can (and I did) use the CASE expression directly in a (not so simple) PARTITION BY clause.
    Why did I use COUNT? The important thing about each partition is whether or not it includes any rows with flag='Y'. I don;t know of any function that directly answers that question. There are lots of ways to get the correct answer, but I think the one that corresponds most closely to the question we really want to ask:
    "Do any rows have flag='Y'?" is
    "How many rows have flag='Y'?"
    The analytic function COUNT (x) returns a number (possibly 0) of rows in the partition where x is not NULL. So, as the argument to COUNT, I used
    CASE
        WHEN  ac.flag = 'Y'
        THEN  1
    --  ELSE  NULL          -- I did not explicitly say this, but it is the default
    ENDwhich returns either
    (a) the literal number 1 or
    (b) NULL
    Instead of the literanl number 1, I could have used any literal or expression, of any data type, that is not NULL). all that matters is we produce something non-NULL for COUNT to count.
    <h2>(2) A solution for a new problem involving the same tables</h2>
    Also, I was trying to modify this query to fit my other similar requirement where I would need following output
    Original output:
    SOURCEKEY F    ACCTKEY
    0 N       9648
    0   N      9647
    9648 N       9813
    9647 Y       9812
    So, the query should be smart enough to return only the last two rows where sourcekey >0 which is
    SOURCEKEY F    ACCTKEY
    9648 N       9813
    9647 Y       9812
    And In case there are only first two 2 rows in the table then , it should return only those two row and not check for sourcekey > 0 which would be .
    SOURCEKEY F    ACCTKEY
    0 N       9648
    0   N      9647 Is it something that I should be using analytical function to solve this requirement. I am trying to accomplish this new requirement.If I understand this problem correctly, it does indeed involve mutually exclusive divisions, but in this problem, the divisions correspond more closely to a single column in the table. We want to divide the table into two mutually exclusive groups:
    (A) rows where soucekey > 0, and
    (B) rows where sourcekey = 0
    We could do that with a CASE expression, but there happens to be a built-in function that works very nicely.
    SIGN (sourcekey) returns
    (A) 1 if sourcekey > 0, and
    (B) 0 if sourcekey = 0
    But what do we want to do with those divisions? We want to display rows only from the "best" of those divisions, where division (A) is coinsidered "better" than division (B). That is, if there are any rows in division (A), then we want to display only rows in division (A), but if there are no rows in division (A), then (and only then) we want to display rows in divison (B).
    This is an example of a Top-N Query , where we want to display N items from the top of an ordered list. A typical top-N query uses an analytic function (either ROW_NUMBER, RANK or DENSE_RANK, depending on how we want to handle ties) to assign numbers to each row (lower numbers for the "better" rows), and then uses "WHERE f <= n" to display only the n "best" ones. (A special case, though a very common one, is where N=1, that is, we're only interested in the row (or rows, if there happens to be a tie) with the "best" value. In this case, most people find it cleare to say "WHERE f = 1" ratehr than "WHERE f <= 1". Your problem is an exmple ot that special case.)
    SELECT  sourcekey
    ,     flag
    ,     acctkey
    FROM     (
             SELECT  ac.sourcekey
             ,         NVL (ac.flag, 'N')     AS flag
             ,         ac.acctkey
             ,         DENSE_RANK () OVER (ORDER BY  SIGN (sourcekey)     DESC)     AS division_num
                FROM    itemtable     i
             ,         finance     f
             ,         acct     ac
               WHERE   i.itemtableid1      = f.parentid1
               AND         i.itemtableid2      = f.parentid2
             AND         f.financekey      = ac.financekey
               AND         i.parenttableid      = 19063
    WHERE     division_num     = 1
    ;Notice I talked about "mutually exclusiive *divisions* " above, not "mutually exclusive *partitions* ".
    There is no PARTITION BY in the analytic clause above. PARTITION BY means we want a separate, independent caluclation for each partition. Here, we want one single numbering for the entire result set.
    We want all rows that tie for the "best" to be numbered 1, so we have to use DENSE_RANK (or RANK) rather than ROW_NUMBER.

  • Urgent , Two Query questions ...

    Hello everybody ,
          i have created a query in our production system . but i found some people can change my query setting (ex : my local fileds & selection fields ) , has any one can tell me how can i disable the 'Change' function in 'SQ01' ? many thanks !
    (i also use 'su24' to check the authorzation object in 'SQ01' , but i don't know which one can help me to solved this case)
          another question that is when i execute the query i found one of the field's sequence was wrong . but this query is used everyday & nobody has changed it . but when i use  sort this function to make it & it seems ok . therefore i think the problem is in the table index , right ? Has anyone can tell me how to check it ?
    Best Regards,
    Carlos

    hi Ramki
         the query is made by ourselves . the data is only fetched from the billing table (vbrk & vbak) . but today i found some filed's sequence was wrong & i don't know what cause this .
    another problem is that could you tell me how to disable 'Change' function in 'SQ01' ?
    many thanks ~
    Best Regards,
    Carlos

  • Named query question

    Hi Guys,
    I have the following problem - I know I did something wrong, but I cannot figure out how to correct it. Here is my question:
    I have a table tableA, with composite key (col1, col2, col3, col4). I mapped the table, and create a Toplink named query (findCol3List)as such:
    select distinct col3
    from tableA
    where col1=#col1 and col2=#col2
    I created an EJB session method getCol3List(col1, col2) -
    now when I run the application to call this EJB method, I got the following error at line:
    List results = (List)session.executeQuery("findCol3List", String.class, params);
    Exception Description: Missing descriptor for [java.lang.String] for query named [findCol3List].
    I know there are multiple mistakes in my approach, but with my limited Toklink knowledge, I could not figure out.
    Any help with be appreciated!

    hello,
    The executeQuery method is trying to look up the "findCol3List" in the descriptor for the class passed in. It is complaining because you passed in String.class which does not have a valid descriptor.
    How/where did you define the named query? Chances are you defined it in the class used for TableA, and so should specify it in the executeQuery method:
    session.executeQuery("findCol3List", tableA.class, params);
    Best Regards,
    Chris

  • Creating SAP QUERY - question about tables in buisness transactions.

    Hello.
    I am pretty new to SAP.
    I want to create a query, as i so far have successfully done by creating a join in transaction SQVI.
    I am useing several tables;
    CRMD_ORDERADM_H
    CRMD_ORDERADM_I
    CRMD_ORDER_INDEX
    I have two questions.
    1: I try to join CRMD_ORDER_INDEX-PARTNER_NO with BUT000-PARTNER, but it won't do the trick. After a join like this i would like to join BUT000 with ADRC . Can someone explain how i could do this?
    2: I want join CRMD_ORDERADM_I with all the partners for the specific Item. (sold-to-party, shipping-party and so on). Can anyone tell me which table(s) i can find this in, and what fields to join.
    I will appreciate any answer to this

    Hi,
    For the second question, enter your transaction number ( Object ID ) into <b>CRMD_ORDERADM_H</b>  table. Pass the guid to table <b>CRMD_LINK.</b>
    Take set guid from CRMD_LINK and pass it to <b>CRMD_PARTNER</b>.
    You will get all the partners in that transaction
    regards,
    Prashant
    <b>Kindly Reward the points if helpful !</b>

  • Web Service Query Question

    I have a process that is going through each account record and doing some processing on it.
    This is a time consuming process. It takes close to 20 minutes to complete.
    I would like to provide a better status message to my customer to let them know how much longer the process should take.
    My question is:
    Can I retrieve the count of the number of records that would be returned based on the query criteria I am using?
    I would use this to provide a status message like
    "Processing account 50 of 120,000"

    Hi All,
    Recently we also had the same requirement, count the number of records and we achieved it by reports.
    1. create a report which generates the simply total count of records.
    2. on your custom page / application access that report and get the count.
    Dinesh
    CRMIT

  • Complex Query Question

    I am doing a 9-1-1 reporting system. I am selecting calls by
    Agency and type of call for a given month. That works fine, but I
    need them printed in desending sequence by number call far a call
    type. Don't see anyway to accomplish that with one query.
    Is that a way? If not, the second part of this question is
    that I have not created a table using SQL. I need 3 fields, Field_A
    is Text (9 positions); Field_B is Text (40 Positions) and the last
    is my summarized count from the query. How do I create a Table to
    support this function?
    Query
    <cfquery name="GetEventCount"
    datasource="JasperCountyDB">
    select count(AG_ID) as EventCount, TYCOD, TYP_ENG, CURENT
    from aeven
    where ((AG_ID = '#Session.InquiryAgencyCode#')
    AND (CURENT = 'T') AND (CDTS LIKE '#EventReportDate#'))
    group by AG_ID, TYCOD, TYP_ENG, CURENT
    </cfquery>
    Thanks for any guideance that you can provide.
    Ron

    Your question wasn't very clear, but if you only want to sort
    them by the count in descending order, just ORDER BY 1 DESC.
    <cfquery name="GetEventCount"
    datasource="JasperCountyDB">
    SELECT COUNT(AG_ID) as EventCount, TYCOD, TYP_ENG, CURENT
    FROM aeven
    WHERE AG_ID = '#Session.InquiryAgencyCode#'
    AND CURENT = 'T'
    AND CDTS LIKE '#EventReportDate#'
    GROUP BY AG_ID, TYCOD, TYP_ENG, CURENT
    ORDER BY 1 DESC
    </cfquery>
    Phil

  • SQL Query question : how to add data to two tables connected by third Junction-table.

    Hello specialists.
    Maybe this is the wrong formum but I've got a question for which you probably have the answer, i hope.
    Situation
    John is member of Group_A and Group_B
    Bill is member of Group_B and Group_C
    Allison is member of Group_A and Group_E
    How can I create a query to input Allisons username into table 1 and groupmembership into table 2. Also updating the relationship within junction-table3 must be done automaticaly. I want to avoid duplicate records.
    The final situation I want is given in red text.
    The relationships between the tables are as follows
    Table1 (PK)ID-Userinfo    [ONE]    <------------> [MANY] Table3 ID-Userinfo
    Table3 (PK)ID-GroupInfo  [MANY] <------------> [ONE]   Table2 (PK)ID-GroupInfo
    Table1: UserInfo
    (PK)ID-Userinfo   UserName
    1                        John
    2                        Bill
    3                        Allison
    Table2: GroupInfo
    (PK)ID-GroupInfo  GroupName
    1                          Group_A
    2                          Group_B
    3                          Group_C
    4                          Group_E
    Table3: MemberOf
    (PK)ID-MemberOf  ID-UserInfo  ID-GroupInfo
    1                           1                 1
    2                           1                 2
    3                           2                 2
    4                           2                 3
    5                           3                 1
    6                           3                 4
    I hope you can help me cracking this nut.
    Thx in advance. Greetings Fred

    Hi RSingh
    May i comment something very small?
    Anyone who writes a response, done it on the assumption that he is writing the answer. Writing response is the statement of "I think that's correct". Each one that write a response see it as the answer. It makes no sense immediately mark your own
    answer too (double actions). Marking a response as "Propose as answer" is explicitly designed to
    allow others to announce that they think this is the best right answer in the thread, after the discussion :-)
    In my personal opinion, we should not mark our own answers. There are enough users with permissions, which would be glad to mark your answers as correct / recommended.
    Give us the opportunity, I will love to mark your answers :-). Moreover, by marking "Proposed as answer" you actually close the thread, other users which see that the question got an answer, may not check
    the thread at all, and maybe they could provide a different answer.
    * Exceptions are very specific cases. For example a case where the message has already become very old and no one marked anything. in this case marking "Proposed as answer" can help others and especially the person who ask the question, to focus
    on thread and the answer (more on the subject is in the Moderators forum and the Moderators Guide by the way).
    [Personal Site] [Blog] [Facebook]

Maybe you are looking for