Change of Costing Variant in Marking Allowance for CK24 price update

Dear All,
In CK24, price updation previously i had selected one costing variant for one particular material and released the standard price. Now, I am trying to do price update for a different material for which I used different costing variant for doing  the material cost estimate. Now when I am going to Marking Allowance in CK24 for that particular company code the previous costing variant is only displaying. But now for the current material that is not the costing variant for which i need price updation. It is just displaying the old costing variant.
Please let me know how to change the costing variant for the same period.
Regards
Srikanth

Hi Srikanth,
1. IMG: Logistics - General, Retail Pricing
Define list variant and assign items
              Enhance or create a new list variant with list field VKP01
2. IMG: Logistics - General, Retail Pricing
Texts for list fields
              Adjust the text for the list field, for example, PP old
3. Define a new SD condition type ZEKA, for example as a copy of VKP0 (Transaction V/06)
              You can create this new condition either as a separate condition or if it is always determined together with, for example VKP0, you can define it as a condition supplement of VKP0. You achieve this by not assigning an access sequence to ZEKA but including it in the condition supplement schema (schema VKP000 in the standard system) instead. In addition, assign the supplement schema of the main condition (master data subscreen, for example schema VKP000). The main condition must be contained in the calculation schema used so that the condition supplements can be found.
4. Insert the new condition type ZEKA in the sales price calculation schema (Transaction V/08)
              Enhance the schema (assignment per pricing type) with the new condition ZEKA. In the standard system, we deliver schema WWS001 and WWS002. You can insert ZEKA at the end of the schema as a statistical condition.
5. IMG: Logistics - General, Retail Pricing
Control - control per list field, allowed costing levels
              For the sales price calculation schema used, you must set control parameters for the list fields EKPNN and VKP01.
List field EKPNN: In the lower subscreen (Saving list fields in master conditions) enter the new condition type ZEKA (application V). If the new condition type has an access sequence, that is, it is not used as a condition supplement, then you must specify in screen 'Allowed pricing levels' the condition tables in which ZEKA should be stored.
List field VKP01: In the mid subscreen (Transport calculating schema data for list field), specify ZEKA as SP condition type.
Note: if you want to send ZEKA for example in the assortment list as a condition, then you must also enhance the schema for calculating the sales price (VKP001, VKP002 or VKP003 in the standard system) with ZEKA.
If still not working ping me,
Regards,
Srinivas Muthyala

Similar Messages

  • What is the oldest generation of iPad that will still allow me to run IOS8 and allow for future IOS updates?

    Buying a used iPad... what is the oldest generation of iPad that will still allow me to run IOS8 and allow for future IOS updates?
    Thanks

    An iPad 2 will do it...for awhile. Realize that it's seemingly on it's last legs as far as iOS updates go and performance will not be great enough for today's demanding games. Also realize that a big part of running apps smoothly is how much system RAM (the memory area that the apps actually run in) the device has. The iPad 2 has 512 MB which is adequate for most apps but not for some. The iPads above the iPad 2 all have 1 GB of system RAM and the iPad Air 2 has 2 GB.
    The time will come when the iPad 2 can no longer be updated past a certain iOS version (as the iPad 1 is) so it will be more difficult to keep up with apps that you want to be using. This will eventually happen to ALL devices so you'll have to judge if you want to be at the tail-end of iOS updates or at least have a bigger buffer with a newer iPad.

  • Change of Cost Center in Asset Master for Investment measure (AuC) Assets.

    Hi,
    We have an asset class 4001 which has been maintained as an investment measure for AuC. I want to change cost center for all the assets that are maintained in the asset class 4001. The system is showing cost center field in display mode in change transaction of the asset AS02 for all the assets in the asset class. I want to replace the old cost center with new cost center in the asset master record. How can I make the cost center field changeable ? 
    Can anyone help me ?
    Regards,
    K.S.K

    Hi Kattula,
    We can change the cost center for AUC with Investment Measure. To do this you need to identify the relevant WBS element assigned to your asset. You can find the WBSE in Origin tab of your asset master record.
    Then go to the change WBS element Transaction CJ12 and change the cost center. Once you change the cost center of the WBSE, the change would automatically get reflected in the correspondind asset master record.
    This would solve your issue.
    Thanks & Regards
    FICO GSupport team.
    RK & IK.

  • Change a query variant using a program for APD

    Hello everyone,
    Some background:
    We have a complex reporting based on calculated key figures (CKF). However, the business rules do change over time, and the formulas for CKF get outdated. So the business meaning of CKF remains the same, but the way it gets calculated - changes.
    Yesterday CKF "A" = B + C
    Today CKF "A" = B + D - F
    Since the customer requires reporting for the former periods, maintaining several CKF of the same business meaning but calculated differently for each period becomes a problem.
    Instead of having several versions of CKF "A", we decided to use APD, to periodically run the query with valid CKF, save the query results to transactional ods, then move it to another infocube. Now we will have the infocube with figures and dates, and the customer needs to maintain just one CKF "A".
    After trying this out we've encountered following issue:
    Since the query will run periodically we must use a time period filter (in fact - variable on a time characteristic - APD is not working with filter) to select CKF valid for this month for example.
    The query in APD can work with variables only via query variants.
    Now, the question is how to change the query variant automatically?
    We can not force the customer to create new query variants each month for dozens of reports.
    We plan to integrate APD in the process chain (although we haven't check how it works), where the query variant will be changed using a program.
    so please advice:
    1) is there any function module to change query variants in the background
    2) which tables contain the query variant, so we can change it using abap
    3) may be you can suggest other options to make it work
    thank you
    Message was edited by:
            Northern

    Hi,
    here it is.
    write this code in SE38.
    REPORT  ZDATE_CAL..
    DATA: itab_tvarvc like tvarvc,
          l_date like sy-datum,
          l_monthyear_low type /BI0/OICALMONTH,
          l_monthyear_high type /BI0/OICALMONTH,
          l_day(2) type c,
          l_month(2) type c,
          l_year(4) type c,
          l_mandt(3) TYPE c VALUE '010',
          l_type(1) type c VALUE 'S',
          l_numb(4) type N value '0000'.
          l_day = sy-datum+6(2).
          l_month = sy-datum+4(2).
          l_year = sy-datum+0(4).
          concatenate l_day l_month l_year into l_date.
          concatenate '01' l_year into l_monthyear_low.
          concatenate l_month l_year into l_monthyear_high.
    variable for current month interval
    itab_tvarvc-mandt = l_mandt.
    itab_tvarvc-name  = 'ZDATE_INV'.
    itab_tvarvc-type  = l_type.
    itab_tvarvc-numb  = l_numb.
    itab_tvarvc-sign  = 'I'.
    itab_tvarvc-opti  = 'BT'.
    itab_tvarvc-low   = l_monthyear_low.
    itab_tvarvc-high  = l_monthyear_high.
    update TVARVC from itab_tvarvc.
    This code will always maintain the entry for the variable 'ZDATE_INV' as range from the start of month till current month.
    you can modify it store anything yuou want.
    Now when creating the variant by clicking the create variant option when running the query.
    you have the option in the "selection variable" column here you will find only TVARVC table as option select it and then in "name of variable" use the Z variable you have just created.
    This will automatically pick the current value for the variant for that variable.
    So anytime the variant is used in any of the scheduling it will pick the inout from here.
    make sure that the variable for time interval is of same type as that of the entry in the TVARVC table.
    That if it is of type calmonth then TVARVC table should have variable entry of type calmonth.
    thanks

  • Can we use two costing variant for standard cost estimate

    Hi,
    Can we use two costing variant for standard cost estimate of two different materials in the same period ? e.g. Costing variant Z001 for Material code 1000 and Costing Variant Z002 for Material code 2000.
    Here the system is not allowing to change the costing variant in Marking Allowance (t code CK24) for marking and release of Material cost 2000 if the standard cost for Material code 1000 is already marked and released.
    Thanks,
    Bijay

    For a material in a period only one price can be released. Though you cn have two separate costing variants and then calculate standard estimate with that. U can release based on one variant only for a month. Or use MR21 and update the price as per the other variant
    Thanks and Regards

  • Can we use two costing variants for standards cost estimate release.

    Hi,
    We have 2 plants (plant 5100 and plant 5200) under company code 5000.
    We have run standard cost estimate(CK11N) for material 98001000027 at plant 5100 using costing variant ZG01 and at plant 5200 using costing variant ZG02. First, we released  standard cost estimate (CK24) for this materia at plant 5100 and set (in marking allowance) costing variant ZG01 and costing version 01. Next time when we are trying to release the standard cost estimate for the same material for plant 5200, it is automatically picking ZG01 as costing variant in marking allowance and it is not allowing to change the costing variant to ZG02 saying Company code 5000: Release already carried out, cancellation not possible, Message no. CK797.
    Is it possible to use two different costing variants for release of standard cost estimate for a material at two different plants at the same company code? If so how?
    Please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Bijay

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply again.
    What is the benefit of assigning "Single Valuation Variant same to different Plants" ? In costing variant also we can assign maximum only one valuation variant and this valuation variant will default for all the plants, and hence I dont think it is necessary to assign same valuation variant to different plants.
    My  issue is :
    Example: ( Standard Cost Estimate for material 98001000027)
    Plant - 1
    Material Cost                                             Rs.100
    Labour Cost                                               Rs.50
    Overheads (10% of Labour Cost)                  Rs.5
    (say ,through costing sheet - 1)
    Total Standard Cost Estimate                      Rs.155
    Plant - 2
    Material Cost                                             Rs.150
    Labour Cost                                               Rs.100
    Overheads (20% of Labour Cost)                  Rs.20
    (say, through costing sheet - 2)
    Total Standard Cost Estimate                      Rs.270
    Now, Please explain why we cannot have two Standard Cost Estimates for a material at two different plants? If it is possible to have two standard cost estimates for a material at two different plants, how to take care of  overheads (rate of which varies) at two different plants (plant - 1 > 10% and plant- 2>20%) as we can assign maximum one costing sheet to a valuation variant variant?
    How to map the system so as to meet the above requirement?
    Thanks,
    Bijay

  • New Cost Component Structure in new Costing Variant

    Hi gurus,
    i created a new costing variant (to be used for planned prices, for budget purposes), then a new cost component structure.
    Now the system (transaction OKTZ) doesn't allow me to assign the new cost component structure to the new costing variant forcing me to mask the costing variant with ++++.
    But the aim, for me, is just assigning the new cost component structure to the new costing variant only for a company code and only for a plant.
    Does anybody know how i can reach the goal? Am i missing some step?
    Thanks in advance for the collaboration,
    Best regards
    Enrico

    Hi Utenza
    You can very well achieve this
    1. First of all ensure that a masked entry exists i.e. ++++ in Comp Code field, Plant Field, Costing variant Field and assign the Prmary cost comp str here
    2. Then, coming to the new costing variant and new cost comp str,
    a. Enter ++++ in the comp code field
    b. Enter your plant name in the Plant Field (and not ++++)
    c. Enter your new costing variant here.. (This should be the costing variant where costing type is not 01)
    d. Assign your new cost comp structure here against this costing variant
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Product Costing - Two Costing Variants - Mark and Release In Same Company Code Same Period

    Hi All,
    We are currently handling a CO-PC project where client has requirement to use two different costing variants in the same period in the same company code. SAP standard does not allow use of two costing variants in the same period for the same company. We can have only One Costing Variant per Co Code for Marking / Releasing Standard Price. 
    There are some materials in Plant 1 or Plant 2 for which cost estimates using costing variant ABC1 calculated and than prices are marked and released (CK24), now same materials are received in Plant3 where mixed costing is used and thus need to have cost estimates from second costing variant ABC3 (second costing variant) marked and released. Object is to have ABC3 cost estimates in material master standard price field, but SAP does not allow to mark and release for second costing variant in the same period for same co code as ABC1 variant already ran for plant1 or Plant2 under same company code,therefore, business is not able update ABC3 prices in Standard price of the material master. 
    Purpose of this second costing variant mark and release run is that for some materials business would like to implement costing at Plant3 level also, where they get same materials from different production sites (Plants). At Plant3 level, business is using mixed costing where the standard price is a weighted Average standard price, taking the different production sites standard cost into consideration in combination of the volume split between those production sites.
    Did any one worked on this kind of requirement? Is there any SAP standard way to handle? Or this will need some ABAP enhancement?
    Kindly advise.

    Hi Atul
    1. You dont need separate Valuation Variant in Plant 3
    2. Use Costing Variant ABC1 and ensure that it has the needed Valuation Strategies in Valuation Variant
    Allow Complete Transfer in the Transfer Control i.e. Cross Plant Transfer in it
    3. Assign the Qty Str Type you have used in ABC3, to ABC1.. i.e. In the Costing Version, assign the Qty Str Type to the Costing Type and Valuation Variant from ABC1
    After this, do CK11N and CK24 for Plant 1
    Then do CK11N and CK24 for Plant 3, using ABC1.. You dont need to change anythiing before doing CK11N for Plant 3
    To make it simple, you can use any one of ABC1 or ABC3 in both the plants.. You only need to ensure that Valuation Variant, TRansfer Control are set up as desired
    Br. Ajay M

  • Costing Variant for refurbhsiment order

    Hi,
    I have settting up refurbishment order. will the costing variant would be different for ref.order from normal maintenance order?
    Please advise!
    Regards,
    Meghana

    Hi,
    Costing variants contain control parameters for all aspects of costing.
    The costing variant forms the link between the application and
    Customizing, since cost estimates are created and saved with reference
    to a costing variant.
    The costing variant controls how costing is executed, such as:
    o Whether the costing results are planned costs or actual costs
    o Which prices are used to valuate materials, internal activities, and
    external activities
    o How overhead is calculated
    A costing variant includes the following groups of settings:
    o Costing type
    o Valuation variant
    o Number range assignment
    to know more about Costing part , dicuss with your CO consultant,
    try  OIOF tocheck for the costing variant assigned to Refurbishment order type. Remember Refurbishment order will be settled to the Material itself not to the Cost Center
    Regards
    Prakash

  • Costing Variant for Actual

    I require a clarification:
    We define costing variant for standard cost estimation.  We are in Process Order scenario.  Likewise, should we have to use a costing variant for actual product estimation ?  We want to have actual cost from the Product costing to the COPA from the cost component structure.

    Hi
    I think you are mixing up 2 things
    1. One is costing variant for actual product cost estimate -  As said by Declan you need to deifne this in OPL1 and assign it to your prod order type
    2. Std cost estimate in COPA: For this you create a costing key and assign your costing variant (that you used for std cost estimate in CK11N/CK40N).... You assign this costing key to material types, etc and map your cost component structure to value fields.... With this, your std cost estinate gets trf to COPA during SD billing
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Wrong costing variant defaulting in CK40n

    Hello Gurus,
    I have a strange issue, cost estimate was released for a material with wrong costing variant. Using costing reorganization CKR1 i deleted this standard cost estimate. I checked KEKO and KEPH, no cost estimate exist in that plant for the wrong costing variant.
    When i tried to redo the costing run with the correct costing variant, system is not allowing.Its defaulting the old costing variant, no cost estimate being created with the real costing variant
    In CK40N for the Marking&Authorization i am seeing an error red mark, instead of the 'LOCK' sign. Any one experienced the same error or any OSS for this
    thanks
    Nellikka

    Hi,
    Did you checked CK24, which is the permitted Costing variant for the posting period/Fiscal year?
    While marking and releasing the price, a permitted Costing variant will become active for the posting period. I assume, you can only able to mark & release other costing variant in the next period.
    Regards,
    Prabha

  • Re-assign/Change Master Cost Center

    Hi,
    How do we re-assign / change the Master Cost center for a root level org unit under its COST Distribution tab while using PPOME.
    Would like to know where do we do the changes from the available Cost Centers.
    Thanks

    See, yes you can change,
    whenever  you want to change the Master Cost center follow the step
    PPOSE-SELECT START DATE whatever you want Eg. 01.04.2009 , - time Period Complete & Execute-
    Click top left side change button 
    Search you Position -- Double click-go to Account Assignment - Change valid from date (which date from you want to change the cost center)
    Change the cost center & Save 
    This process for follow Org Unit & Position also
    Check the records of the date in Valid from or To there is small arrow First record & previous record other wise select period
    MHPO

  • Change selection criteria or check allowance for marking

    Hi,
    I have executed the costing in CK11N and saved the result. The costing run was successful without any error.
    When I want to Mark the cost in CK24, I am getting the below error. Kindly help to resolve this issue.
    Change selection criteria or check allowance for marking
    Message no. CKCC140
    Diagnosis
    No data was selected for marking.
    Possible causes:
    There is insufficient data in the selection screen to select the required cost estimates.
    The organizational measure was not carried out, or it was issued with a different costing variant to that of the cost estimates ( Marking Allowance).
    All the cost estimates contain errors.
    The cost estimates have already been marked or released.
    For detailed information, call up the log.
    thanks and regards
    Murugesan

    Dear Murugesan,
    First ensure in CK11N,you have saved the cost estimate without any error,the signal showing with green colour.
    Then in CK24,first take a test run for marking and then without the check box for test run.
    Before Executing this T Code for marking,click on marking allowance and ensure for the period,company code and the same
    costing variant and costing version,it shows green colour which indicates alloed for marking and release,otherwise,just click on
    your company code,enter the costing variant and costing version and save the datas.
    This should be done only once during the period begining.
    Once after doing this,ensure you have complete authorization for marking and release.
    Check and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • Block Costing variant for mark & release

    Hi All,
    How to block a particular Costing Variant for marking & release?
    Regards,
    Abhishek

    Hi,
    in Costing type (part of costing variant), under price update tab, you need to select "no price update" paramenter.
    If you do this your issue is solved
    Best Regards
    surya

  • Costing Variant not visible in CK24 for my plant.

    Hello Experts,
    Using transaction OKKN, I have created a new costing variant ZPC1 to take the place of PPC1 for updating standard cost in the material master.  I basically copied most of the parameters ( including the Costing Type) from PPC1 but changed to a different Valuation Variant.  Running CK11n successfully generates a cost estimate without error (status KA) that meets our requirements. 
    The trouble is in transaction CK24.  I click the Marking allowance icon and I see both our actual plant, and the dummy preconfigured plant 0010.  For our actual plant, I also see the fields populated for Costing version 1 and Released check mark.  If I drill down on our plant, I get a pop-up for "Permitted std cost est variants", showing only PPC1.  However, if I drill down on the dummy plant 0010, I first get a search pop-up for "Permitted std cost est variants"  with an open field for "Costing Variant".  Drilling down further shows both PPC1 and ZPC1.
    I think maybe a "Costing Version" has been defined for our actual plant, and that is pre-selecting PPC1 and preventing me from using ZPC1, but when I search in config (transaction OKYD), I see nothing defined.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    My problem has been solved.  There was actually nothing wrong with the configuration.
    The problem was that the Marking Allowance had already been activated for costing variant PPC1 in period 11/2009.  This was visible from the marking allowance screen by the population of the fields Costing Version 01 and the check mark in the field Releaded.
    Now that we have moved on to period 12/2009, the Costing Version is blank and I see both Costing Variants available.  When I select a variant to allow marking, the Costing Version gets populated.  After running CK11N again to create a cost estimate for period 12, I was then able to Mark and Release my new estimate and verify that the new Standard Price updated in the Material Master.
    Thanks for your help, and I hope this record may be of value to others.

Maybe you are looking for