Change of Fund Center

Hi all
i have created one fund center (EX: C00001) postings are made towords that fund center now my user wants to change the fund center (EX: C000_1 instead of C00001) so how to change the fund center.
Thx
Venkat

Hello
Check the validity period of the fund center.
Change the validity so that it can no longer be used.
Now try to change the fund center.
I am not sure.
Reg
Suresh

Similar Messages

CHanges to Funds Center HIerarchy not reflected in STS

Hello,
I wonder if the changes that I made to say Funds Center hierarchy should be automatically reflected in STS. Currently when I upload new hierarchy to BW from R/3 my hierarchy never gets updated for STS. Is this a normal procedure that I have to manually re-import hierarchy in BW to STS, or this is abnormal?
Thank you

In my experience the changed hierarchy has to be re-imported to the STS subplan.
(Even if the hierarchy was automatically changed, it would still be necessary to assign names, functions, to the new elements).
Regards Stephen

Fund Center and equipemnt master link

Hi!
In our org. Funds Management is active. Now I want to Test Equipment calibration(Internal). I have created Equipment, maintain the strategy and schedule the same as daily.
Now my order has created but it is not released automatically.
Reason is "System status FMAI is active". If I entered Funds center in the order manually it is released.
My question is how to link funds center with order type or equipment so that order can be released automatically.
Thanks
Biswajit Datta

Dear
The Fund center is assined from cost center. In this case it is assigned with maintenance cost center at FMDERIVER t code.
Initailly the fund center is created by FMSA. There it is assigned with Fund area, controlling area,company code. Basically it is working thro assignemnt only. Each period Fm dept release the fund for these fund cnters with various commitment items.
In order level you should maintian the fund center once fund is activated. Thro customer exit while creating the order automatically system picks the maintenance work centers fund center as default. So your master data is helping for this work.But you can change the fund center at any time. The things is once materail is posted thefund will be deducted from assigned fund cnter at the time of issue.The fund availablity you can check thro FMRP_RFFMTO30X tcode.

Wrong fund center updation in financial entry

dear all,
I am facing the typical problem with system , we have created service P.O with fund center xxxx and trying to do the service entry sheet by adopting the services from P.O and changed the Fund center to yyyy.
we have used the same service number multiple time in one S.E.S and changed its fund center to yyyy. when we release the S.E.S its financial entry are showing some with xxxx and some entries with yyyy fund center in single S.E.S for one service.
can any one explain, how this happends and suggest the solution..!!
Regards,
Manu

hi
check is there any substitution is used in finance for line item

Change/Updation of old PRs, POs with FM Objects i.e. Fund, Fund Center etc.

Dear Experts
We are implementing Funds Management-BCS in our Business.
The effective Year is FROM 2011 Financial Year. And we are creating the FM Objects i.e. Fund, Fund Center, Budget Period with Valid From Date is 1st April 2011.
Also we made the configuration settings of "Allow BLANK as Value for Account Assignment Elements" is TO YEAR 2010 Financial Year.
Our questions are:
1. When we make any changes in the old Purchase Requisitions, Purchase Orders etc., created in Financial Year 2010 or before; whether the system will check that 'Valid From date' of Fund, Fund Centers should be on or before date of Purchase Requisition or Purchase Order creation date or not?
2. When we try to update old open PRs, POs which are created in Finanicla Year 2010 or before with FM Objects i.e. Fund, Fund Center etc. through Transaction Code FMCN; whether the system will check that 'Valid From date' of Fund, Fund Centers should be on or before date of Purchase Requisition or Purchase Order creation date or not?
We request you to provide your valuable suggestion/information.
Thanks and Regards
PVSRG

Hi Gupta, how are u!?
P.V.S.R. Gupta wrote:
> When we implemented FM-BCS effective from Financial Year 2011; why the system is expecting to contain/having FM Account Assignment Objects in old PRs, POs etc., existing in the Financial Year 2010 or before?
You active BCS for year 2011, thats all right., but if u have got FMDERIVE rules, when u change PRs or POs the strategic derivation detect this operation and try to input Assignment Objects.
Please try to trace that chances with TRACE tool from FMDERIVE.
If u need more help about trace, please check the OSS note: [666322|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/666322].
Make an entire process, and view the log
Regards,
Osvaldo.

Org Level, fund center/cost center level restriction for tcodes????

I am looking to see whether org level restriction and cost center/fund center level restriction is possible for certain set of transactions.
I am using USOBX table for this analysis. This table has a check flag field ( same as in SU24) which says whether the Tcode (program) does the authority check for certain auth objects. Example- X (checked but not maintained in USOBT). This table pulls up several authorization objects under the 'X' category. However, when I do the System trace for the same tcode, all the objects (marked as X) are not captured. Instead only a few are captured.
Can we rely on the USOBX data or should we do system Trace for every tcode. I am just pulling a report and not creating roles at this point. So trace is time consuming. But data reliability is equally important.
My objective is to verify whether org level and cost center/fund center level restriction is possible or not for some tcodes.
Do you have any suggestion to achieve this faster (through USOBX or any other means)?
Thanks in advance
Kee

I would suggest you to check USOBX_C and USOBT_C instead of USOBX and USOBT as it will have your customization as well and not just the standard ones given by SAP.
Also when check field is X ...it means the object is checked but not maintained for the t-code as you already said but I am not sure how much it will help you as the they will not be pulled by PFCG when you are creating the role until you change the object to Check / maintain . When you do that the check field will be Y and not X. So basically it is the Y one which you need to see.
Going for trace is time consuming for every t-code and I am not sure if it really needed. When your roles are in testing phase and are tested by the functional team or the team which needs it and if they are missing some object, you can run a trace and find the missing object....
I am not sure on what basis you want to change some field to Org level ...but typically it is done if you want to do segregation of roles based on these org level. There could be various other reasons and it is better to talk to your functional counterparts before changing a field to Org level.
for ex : If you want to segregate on company code, you will create co. code as Org level and create roles for different company code.

Error while doing miro of network purchase order ( no funds center entered/

Hi,
we are facing one problem while doing miro of network service purchase order. System is giving message 'No funds center entered/derived in item 00030'.
We have activated funds management in Jul'10. The said network service PO belong to previous year. Also we have changed
commitment item of GL account related to concerned service order in Jul'10 & posted GRN one in apr'10 & one aug'10.
System is not allowing to cancel the service entry sheet.
Can anybody help on this.
regards
abhishek

we had activated the trace facility for FMDEIRIVE & found that all FC/Commitment item derived correctly. But while posting the document it is throwing an error.
Regards
Abhishek

Error while Updating Fund Center in Work Order

Hi All,
In out System, we have integrated PM-FM. in that, we have incorporated a "User-Exit" which populates the User a change-of "Cost Centre" just while saving the order; where the User can insert any other Cost center other than the one already picked & displayed by the System.
The problem now in FM is that; the initially displayed cost center prior to the update of cost center; is the one that is picked by the FM Derivation Strategy; which does not get updated when the new cost center is updated.
Hence, although the Order contains a new Cost center; the Fund Center displayed is the one that was mapped to the prior cost center according to the FM Derivation Strategy in FMDerive.
Kindly help !!
Thanks in Advance.................
Regards,
Pratham

Sahu
Can you also post a screen-shot of the error message popup.
PeteA

Update Fund & Fund center data in auto generated PR during MRP RUN

Problem in the MRP auto generated PRs.
The normal PRs created manually have all relevant fields of fund center viz CO area ,commitment item,Funds center, fund.
But the problem is with respect to the Purchase Requisitions generated automatically during the MRP RUN.
How to include the fund centers in MRP generated PRs automatically in the creation stage itself instead of going into change mode using ME52n Transaction code and change it to include fund centers one by one for each line item.
We require this as we have hundreds of PRs generated every day.

Hi,
In order to fulfill this requirement, transaction FM_MRP_PR should be used.
Please also take a look to FM_MRP_PR on-line documentation :
The PRs generated from the MRP run are considered as planning documents
and do not have any impact on the budget. To encumber these PRs in the
corresponding settlement receivers, you have to execute this program for
the relevant PRs.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

MM-FM integration. How to stop update of Fund Center and Commitment Item

Hello!
Anyone please help. MM-FM integration.
Our problem is after automatic creation of PR and PO from work orders, and the fund center and commitment item in the PR and PO has been changed/updated by the user, and then we change something in the work order and save it, the fund center and commitment item of the PR and PO goes back to default value (based on FMderive). Is there a way to stop this?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Rona

It seems like you have selected "Do not overwrite target values" option in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in the derivation rule defined.
Go through SAP Note 666322, make sure the Trace feature in On and then choose the option "Overwrite Target Values" in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in your derivation rule. After that, see the Difference before and after values in the trace log created after performing the derivation rule.
I am sure this will help.
Regards,
Amar Lal

Unable to do the restriction at Fund Center or FM Area when FM is not activ

Hi,
we have the following business requirement:
Background of the issue:
Field Status variant in Account Assignment category and GL:
We are in the process of rolling out one of our company codes which is
in a different instance(server).
We already have some 130+ company codes running in a different
instance. This is a kind of Instance consolidation to bring all systems
under one instance.
Funds Management has been activated in the company code for which we
are carrying out the rollout. FM has not been activated for the
existing company codes.
Now, the issue is with regard to the field status variants, which can
be controlled at the company code level and which cannot be controlled
which is at the client level.
(i)     The existing company codes have a field status variant which
has the field status groups having the fields Commitment items and
Funds center in Suppress mode in the existing instance.
(ii)     The company to be rolled out has the field status variant which
has field status groups having the fields Commitment items and Funds
Center in Optional mode.
(iii)     On the other hand, there is yet another field status control
for the Account assignment objects like Cost center, WBS elements, etc.
in the MM-FI integration area. This is at client level and at present
the same has the status of u201CSuppressu201D for Commitment items and Funds
Center. We have changed the same to u201COptionalu201D for the purpose of
testing the proposed roll out in our existing instance.
In that case, the status of GL account assignment in above is
clashing with our client level field status as described in (iii)
above. As a result, we are forced to change the field status in
above to optional mode for our existing company codes which we do not
intend to do.
When only one company within a group of companies is activated with FM,
I feel that:
(i)     At the client level, there is no option for me other than to
keep the Funds center and commitment items in optional mode
(ii)     At the GL level, I should be able to keep my field status in
Suppress mode (If FM is not activated) and in Optional mode (If FM is
activated) and SAP should be able to take care of the clash in the
field status at the transaction level in such a scenario.
The issue is we are able to control the access if FM is activated for a particular company code, where as we are unable to control the access for other company codes where FM is not activated and FM Area is not linked.
We tried to use the BADI ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST, but this is applicable for POs only.
Please look into this issue and help us in meeting our business requirement.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramakrishna

Hi Justin,
Thanks for the extra points.
Copy and save this bold text some where
/Applications/iChat.app/Contents/MacOS/iChat -errorLogLevel 7
This needs to be run in Terminal.
iChat needs to be shut down to do so.
Just paste it in Terminal after the Welcome to Darwin message and hit enter.
It will launch iChat and create an on-going log in the Terminal window.
You will see the reference to the Harware rules.plist
Further down you will see the bandwidth found by iChat, followed by the number of Audio and Video Buddies that you can support.
It goes on.....
It makes a note of the router that you are connected to.
After that it will end up lists listening checks until you connect to a Chat.
This makes this a useful way to find out what iChat can see at it's startup.
To Stop - Quit iChat in the Normal way.
Save the Log in a Text editor of some sort. (Post here if required).
Then Quit Terminal.
It is a useful tool to highlight some things in the start up phase, (And a reminder to look in specific places) when you think you have looked at all the settings.
8:12 PM Wednesday; November 15, 2006

Fund center and commitment item not updated

Hi!
We are using Funds Management together with SRM. When we change the value of e.g. cost center and not the account assignment itself we do not get an update on fund center. When changing account we do not get an update on commitment item either. This is standard SAP and we have been asked to use BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI. Have anyone else had this problem?
I would really appreciate if anyone have some code for this BADI or any other badi e.g. BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI. It is only important that changes in PO when replicated to back end results in the correct update of commitment item and fund center.
Sincerely
Andres

Solved through BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI

Item 010 Fund Center/Commit Payment Budget Exceeded (FM)

Hi Expertise,
Our user executing FMJ2 transaction to carry forward purchase requisition (PR) / Purchase Order (PO) from 2014 to 2015 (April to March) by that time getting the below error message, but budgets are available for 2015.
Item 010 Fund Center/Commit Payment Budget Exceeded
Another user also facing the similar issue while create new PR in the current FY-2015 with different commitment item & fund center, still getting the same error, but budgets are available for 2015.
Kindly share your views and ideas, its urgent.
Thanks,
Jammy

Hi Jammy,
Please check the following hints about this matter:
1) To be on the safe side, please run report RFFMRC04 in test mode, to see if there are differences between the line items and totals table.
If errors arise, please run it in update mode, whithout other budgeting/posting activities occurring at the same time (otherwise you may encounter differences). Then, please reconstruct the AVC totals (FMBV for Former budgeting, FMAVCREINIT for BCS).
2) Reassignment during fiscal year change also uses the Derivation strategy for reassignment (transaction FMYC). Please verify if you have defined in FMYC a different FM account assignment (funds center and commitmente item) than the one that you are expecting.
I am not sure if you have Former Budgeting or BCS, therefore consider also the following:
3) IF you are using Former Budgeting, I guess you are getting BP629. Please check report BPINDAN2_NEW and if the 'Assigned budget' is same as the 'Commitments/actuals' the values are ok and budget is missing. If the values are different, you must run report BPINDX03 (FMBV) first to correct it.
4) IF you are using BCS, I guess you are getting FMAVC* message. For this, use transaction FMAVCR01 to verify your budget consumption and make sure that the budget was updated for payment budget not commitment budget (as per the error message that you are receiving).
5) Please check how this UOM (unit of measure) is defined in transaction CUNI.
In this transaction, you can set the Value-based commitment indicator.
This indicator controls whether commitments for the chosen unit of measure are
recorded on a quantity basis or a value basis. If the indicator is not set, the
commitments are managed on a quantity basis. If you set the indicator they are
managed on a value basis.
For value-based updates, the reduction of purchase order commitments occurs
with the maximum of goods receipt and/or invoice value. For
quantity-based commitments, the reduction of purchase order commitments occurs
with the maximum of goods receipt and/or invoice quantity.
Example:
You create a purchase order with the quantity of 1000 at the price of 10.
You post a goods receipt related to this PO with the quantity of 500 at the
price of 9.
For value-based updates, an amount of 4,500 is updated.
For quantity-based updates, an amount of 5,000 is updated.
I hope this helps.
Regards, Vanessa.

Funds center and commetment item

Good evening!
We are HCM consultants. We were asked by our FI department to conduct a
post run for two personnel numbers in development system.
After the post run, the documents consider errors which say, for
example, that "in position 00001 21 993-05 commitment item was not
determined". 21 is a company code, 993-05 is a G/L account. This error
occurs for numerous accounts. Our FI says that they have customized
everything for 21 company code and have put commitment items for every
G/L account. They ask whether it is possible to customize fields for
funds center and commitment item in HCM, IT0015 where we determine
account assignment.
In the SAP course IPS910 they found a passage about HCM and FI
integration where is said that "Funds center and Fund can be determined
for org. unit/position/personnel. In addition to funds center and fund
there can be determind also a commitment item for info-types
considering account assignmet (0014,0015,2001-2005,2010)".
We in HCM guess that there is something wrong with FI customizing, 'cos
in HCM it's impossible to activate those fields, or even if it
possible - it's wrong.
The question is - is it possible to add fields for funds center in HCM
(IT0015) or it's not worth doing?
Best regards,
Eldar
Steps for Reconstruction
1. In HCM all the entris are standard. We made entries in IT0015,
started payroll and posting.
2. FI made their customizing for 21 company code.

Hello Eldar,
I will provide you some hints below.
1) To have the integration between PSM-FM and HCM, in PSM side you should check:
SPRO (IMG)
Public Sector Management
Funds Management Government
Actual and Commitment Update/Integration
Integration
Integration with Human Resources (HR)
Please check all the sub-menus there and the documentation available in from of each link. It is very good and provides some links for all the customizings that needs to be done.
2) Check also the configuration as it is described in the enclosed note 766613. It is related to view V_T588N.
3) If Funds Management and Controlling are updated in an integrated way such that the cost center is always the leading account assignment and the fund center is derived, the HR must not (and does not) support the maintenance of derived information (such as fund center). Thus there are the following three possible scenarios:
- Funds Management (FM) is not active.   -> HR doesn't show Fund Center
- FM is active but without CO-Integration-> HR shows Fund Center
- FM is active with CO Integration       -> HR doesn't show Fund Center
With CO Integration turned on, the derivation functionality is utilized to determine the Fund Center in HR. However, if you are looking for manual input in the FC field (and subsequent saving of this value on
the database), all I can provide would be a modification to inform HR that the FC field is active.
To perform that, you would need to make the following coding change to give HR the indication that the field should be displayed and edited:
FUNCTION FM_DC_GET_ACTIVE_DIMENSIONS:
    if ( CO-FM-Integration is on )
       IF ( l_f_fm01-co_integration = con_on ).         <   Delete
       IF ( l_f_fm01-co_integration = con_on AND     <   Insert
         NOT l_f_fm01-co_int_start_hr IS INITIAL ).     <   Insert
       IF ( l_f_fm01-co_integration = con_on AND
You will need to perform the necessary testing in HR to ensure that it is functioning as intended as I am unsure of the differences in the HR functionality between 46C and ECC 600.
These scenarios can be maintained with time dependence (active from-dates): There can be a period for the first, a second time interval for the second and a third time interval for the last scenario.
4) Please check if you have implemented note 918775. It should be present in your system
5) Please check if you have implemented note 755796. It should be present in your system
6) Please check also the note 701933.
I hope I could help you
Let me know your comments if I am going in the wrong direction.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

PM Error Message " FM Account assignment is incomplete (Funds center) messa

Dear PM Experts.
We use PM module for both Preventive maintenance and Breakdown maintenace.
While creating an breakdown maintenance order, the system gives me an error message: " FM Account assignment is incomplete (Funds center), error message number FI135";
As a result i cant release the order for further processing.
Kindly help me to resolve this.
Thanks in advance.
Richard.

Hi
Try below it may solve your problem .
1. Go To Change Order (IW32)
2. form the Menu Path --- GOTO -- Assignments -- Fund Management
3. Either your Fund center field will be blank there or the Fund Center available there is no more Valid now .
4. Get the correct Fund Center from commercial & Enter there --- Save the Order & Release it .
Regards
Sameer

Change of Fund Center

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for