Change owner of project?

I need to change the owner of the project.
A little backstory: I'm a freelancer for a commercial project and I created all the scripts, reports, etc in Story Plus, sharing the documents to co-authors within the company that hired me.  Now that the project is wrapped, I would like to transfer ownership of the Story project to the client (who is also a Story Plus subscriber).
Is this possible?  I can't seem to find any documentation on it.
thanks,
Rich

Thank you for all the help. Previously I listed the project as Belvin and Katrina.dvdproj, This was after removing the trailing '# 1'. This did not help. I am now back to the original project name - Belvin and Katrina # 1.dvdproj
I think I did as you listed above.
1. Pasted 'sudo chown -R $UID' into the terminal window.
2. Then entered a space,
3. Dragged the file name into the window.
4. Pressed returned.
5. Entered my new admin password when asked to.
6. Pressed enter.
The following is what I entered and received back,
Last login: Tue Nov 21 22:55:37 on ttyp1
Welcome to Darwin!
jerry-morris-power-mac-g4:~ Home$ sudo chown -R $UID /Users/Home/Movies/Belvin\ and\ Katrina\ \#\ 1.dvdproj/
Password:adminpassword
jerry-morris-power-mac-g4:~ Home$ adminpassword
-bash: adminpassword: command not found
jerry-morris-power-mac-g4:~ Home$ exit
I am still unable to start Belvin and Katrina # 1.dvdproj with iDVD6. Please, if you can, tell me what I am doing wrong.
Thanks, Jerry

Similar Messages

  • Change Default resources Assignment Owner in Project Professional, in the checked-out Enterprise Resource Pool?

    Hi,
    i'm not able to change the default Assignment Owner (massive) in the Checked-out Enterprise resource pool in Project Professional 2013.
    I've also unlocked the "Windows account edit" in the Register Editor.
    Do you know if is this possible or i have to change it for each resource one by one???
    Thanks
    Best regards 
    Daniele
    Daniele

    Hello Daniele,
    I think what you are seeing is by design behavior. Per below article you can set the Default Assignment owner in Project Web Access and it appears in various places in Project client.
    http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/project-help/default-assignment-owner-resource-field-HA010167482.aspx
    If you want to set the same default assignment owner for multiple resources then you can try bulk edit option in resource center.
    Hope this helps.
    Thank you,
    Kiran K.

  • Change Owners and Remove Previous Owner

    We setup both a Visual Studio Online and Azure Development under my contract Developers account who is the sole owner at this time.  I would like to know if we can change owners and then remove my current developer from any administrative roles. Also,
    would all the development work and setup for VSO and Azure move without deleting work done to date? Further to this I would like to change the URL?

    Hi pphawkins,
    For Visual Studio Online account, you can ask the contract Developers to add your MS account to a team member of the Visual Studio Online account and then change the owner ship to your account. Check this
    page for more details.
    If the Visual Studio Online account is linked to an Azure subscription, you can also unlink it then relink to your own Azure subscription. If the development work is deployed to Auzre websites/cloud service, then you might continue
    to keep the linking with former Azure subscription if you don't want to make changes. Or you can deploy to your own Azure websites/cloud service if you'd like to link your Azure subscription to your Visual Studio Online account. Another
    other concerns related to Azure, you can also open a new thread in Azure forums. Thanks for your understanding.
    Best regards,  
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Project Server 2010 - Modification date and name of the person who made the last change in the project

    Hello everybody
    I'm with a doubt.
    I got in the business
    environment Project Server 2010 and
    would like to get the publication date,modification
    date and name
    of the person who made
    the last change in
    the project. It is possible
    to doby the native
    resources or is
    there any query in
    SQL Server to perform a
    query of this information.
    Thank you.
    Obrigado por contactar o fórum Microsoft Technet!

    Hi Hezequias,
    You can get the ProjectModifiedDate column in MSP_EPMProject_userView in the Reporting DB where you can
    get the data based on the projectUID. 
    The "last saved" date in the draft DB (be aware that querying in the draft DB is not supported by MS).
    For the "last modified by", I think it is not stored in any place.
    But you can develop custom code upon publishing the project (Event BeforePublish), writing the current
    date and username automatically into a custom enterprise field.
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MCP, MCTS |

  • Background job executed as SAP*, need advice to change owner.

    Hi all,
    I'm facing an issue where my SAP background job currently has 2 job "SAP_CCMS_CPH_REORG" and "SAP_CCMS_CPH_HRCOLL" under the ownership of sap. I would like to move them away from SAP ID.
    I have tried to recreate the job using sm36 (and using my ID with sap_all profile) in testing environment, but it not seem to work.
    Highly appreciates any advices and/or pointers with regards to the above mention question.
    Thank you.

    Hi all,
    Thank you for the reply but I have forgotten to add a few updates.
    The issue is that I can change owner from SAP* to my ID with sap_all profile.
    But, after execution,
    Job with sap* owner ended successfully, with spool status marked as completed.
    whereas
    Job with my ID as owner ended successfully, but spool status marked as "waiting"
    error mesage:
    Description          Value
    Status:              Frontend unavailable
    Last event:
    Message:             Request on hold
    Date:                19.02.2009
    Time:                11:57:28
    Job status:          On hold
    Error class:         Delayed
    Area:                Data transfer
    Printout:            Not printed
    Apologies for the inconveniences caused.

  • HT201317 Change Owner photo stream

    Hi all,
    How do you change owners for a shared photo stream?  Can there be more than one owner for a shared photo stream?!
    Thanks,
    Ryan

    Or do I just need to delete the Photo stream and start over with a new owner?

  • Changing Owner & Business Group of ASD Custom Resource

    So this is a bit of an expansion of this discussion: https://communities.vmware.com/thread/500669?start=0&tstart=0
    You will see that pizzle85 managed to solve his challenge of BG object ownership by using an ASD Service Catalog Request located in each Business Group's Entitlements so a member of the business group can just run the Provision required to bring the BG item under management in the business group.  This is quite an effective method to solve the need.  He then has a Resource Action that allows for re-"Provision" which changes owner within the business group: a necessary task because managers tend to move around a lot so they can look busy. (just kidding, I love managers--who have a sense of humor)  So to change owner... just perform a "provision" again.
    Apparently this is one of the best kept secrets in vRA because it has been hard to figure out, and nobody is writing about it.  (I can only assume that there is some SE out there who has worked with the developers to get this capability going and it hasn't been shared widely.)
    Note: I think Business Groups as a Service is something I need to plan for (vs centrally managed Business Groups) even though their future implementation might vary, so my examples here are related to that effort because I am too lazy to demonstrate a generic example.  BUT... the idea is... ownership of ASD Inventory Objects (representing ANY Custom Resource) can be modified using this method.  Ownership includes both the owner represented by "ME" in the Items list... and the Business Group  (subtenant Reference & Label) where the item resides in inventory.
    In 6.2.x, I have not found any method in the vRO plugin for vRA to be able to change ownership and business group of an ASD Custom Resource Inventory Item, but it can be accomplished via a combination of (1) ASD Service Catalog or Resource Action "Provision" capabilities and (2) REST calls through the vRA plugin service channels.  (the latter uses the plugin service account authorizations/entitlements)
    Consider this image...
    This could represent a central management point for many business groups: where I can assign a set of resource actions allowing for automation of various business group needs, an anchor point for actions.   Those in the sktest business group Support User or Manager Role would be able to see all the business groups globally if they were all provisioned in sktest.  (a bucket to manage from)
    This also could represent a starting point where business groups are created as real objects, returned as custom resources, and "provisioned" as inventory object items.  But once there...maybe you want to move it?
    Let's say we later decided, seantesting doesn't belong in sktest because we wanted to change from the "we manage it for you" model to the "manage it yourself" model.  How do you move it?
    Like this...
    And it moves now owned by the vRA plugin service account... (which an entitled user could run Take Ownership and own it in that business group)
    The service account obviously needs to be part of the destination business group and as it ends up, has to have an entitlement to any "provision" action in the business group even though the object doesn't exist there.
    This is a tricky hack and this is how it works...
    1. vRO workflow calls the Take Ownership Action in vRA via REST (front door process).  As noted before, this has a provision attribute to the action which we know changes the owner.  So we would expect that the owner would change to the user that is making the request: which is the service account.  The service account becomes the owner, but this wouldn't change the Business Group.
    2. So we change subtentantRef and subtenantLabel in the REST call to the business group we want to target, even though the object isn't in inventory in that business group.  And Voila! The business group item representation re-provisions as a new owner in a new business group.  Effectively changing the owner and moving the object from one BG to another BG using the management-method vs the self-service-method (the latter as pizzle85 did).
    Again... maybe you care less about Business Groups.  Maybe you would prefer self-service. It is the capability of moving a custom resource inventory representation that matters.
    Here is an example of the REST call to run the "Take Ownership" action.  I have a script before this that pulls in all the variables for the "Resource" I am targeting (from the BusinessGroup object ID), the action I am running  (Take Ownership ID), the business group Ref and Label) and some of the properties I need for the Take Ownership action like bgName... but those are actually not necessary. (all of the "entries" are what is required per the Take Ownership request... if that request didn't require any inputs, there would be no entries... it is the top change of subtenant that allows for the BG move)
    System.log("resourceRef: " + resourceRef);
    System.log("resourceActionRef: " + resourceActionRef);
    System.log("targetRef: " + targetRef);
    System.log("targetLabel: " + targetLabel);
    System.log("bgName: " + bgName);
    var payload ={
    "@type":"ResourceActionRequest",
    "resourceRef":{"id":resourceRef},
    "resourceActionRef":{"id":resourceActionRef},
    "organization":{"tenantRef":"vsphere.local","tenantLabel":"vsphere.local","subtenantRef":targetRef,"subtenantLabel":targetLabel},
    "state":"SUBMITTED",
    "requestNumber":0,
    "requestData":
    {"entries":[
    {"key": "provider-rYouSure","value":{"type":"boolean","value":"true"}},
    {"key": "provider-bgName","value": {"type": "string","value":bgName}}]}
    payload = System.getModule("org.dojotoolkit.dojo.json").serialize(payload);
    System.log(payload);
    Server.log(payload);
    var catalogRest = cafeHost.createRestClient(vCACCAFEServicesEnum.CATALOG_SERVICE);
    var response = catalogRest.post("consumer/requests",payload);
    Best of luck in your Automation Efforts!
    Sean

    Turns out... it is likely not required as part of the request data.

  • Change owner

    i want to give change owner authorization to user in marketing document where is that authorization

    hI  Ajit
    it could be done through two ways however i cant give u the query for that  as i don't have but could tell u they
    one way is through SP that could Solve ur problem nd second way is through SDK but i would not recommend using the SP as sap does not support usage of it
    so u can ask other fellow  user to provide u with the query for either of the ways
    or there is a third way that is most easy out of the others thats is through creating additional authorization
    go to admin-system initialization authorization- addiction authorization creator then create a new authorization under the form id please place the "form number.item number" and save the document
    and please don't forget to click on items and under option place "Full/Read/None"
    and then go to authorization window choose the user id for which u wana place the restriction then move down to user authorization there u would find the authorization that u made in additional authorization creator and assign the authorization as per your requirement
    Hope that would help u
    Regards
    Mannish
    Edited by: manish.malik on Jul 19, 2010 5:37 PM

  • Adjust changes in Implementation Project  back to Template Project

    Hello All,
    Please can you help with transaction SA_PROJECT_UPGRADE, the case is as follow:
    STEP 1
    - Template project is created including process structure and documents, template is activated
    - Implementation project: is created derived from template project.
    - In Template project: Change in pocess node made: added an new process node
    - Run SA_PROJECT_UPGRADE with checked box "New Version of Original" and chosen project: Implementation project
    - Implementation project:  the yellow boxes appears on the appropriate place and button "adjust to original" is used.
    So far, so good
    STEP 2
    - Implementation project: a new process node is added, project is saved
    - Run SA_PROJECT_UPGRADE with checked box "'Current Version in Project" and chosen project: Implementation project
    - Template project: no changes are visible in SOLAR01 or SOLAR02
    - In SOLAR01: settings -> User specific -> box checked "Dislay changes made in project"
    So far, NOT good.
    Resume:
    - using transaction SA_PROJECT_UPGRADE from Template -> Implementation Project works according documentation
    - using transaction SA_PROJECT_UPGRADE from Implementation Project -> Templates does not work according documentation
    Does anybody recognise this?
    Or do I oversee something?
    System: SSM 4.0 updated to SP13
    Thanks in advance
    Rutger Koppelaar

    Hi Rutger (& all others watching this thread),
    I would like to make certain corrections to one of the points posted by me:
    2) Within a Template Project, any actual changes to the document does not offer itself as a 'change' while doing comparison on Implementation Project. In other words, after a given Scenario and all its associated documentation are copied into an Implementation project, if a given document at a given node needs to be edited, it's better to create a new document and upload it in Template Project than to open & change the same document. If the same document is edited, the Compare and Adjust cannot see that as 'difference'.
    On the above point, I have now see better/different results with my recent work; not sure if this is version/ support package specific.
    Environment:
    SolMan 4.0
    SAP_BASIS - Release 700 Level 0013
    SAP_ABA - Release 700 Level 0013
    ST - Release 400 Level 0014
    Assumption: Both the Template and Implementation Projects are in the same SolMan instance and not a case where the Template is being transported into another instance!
    Findings (please bear with this verbose description; one day I intend creating a Blog instead, to list all these points):
    (1) In General Documentation Tab of Template Project, any changes made is instantly visible in General Documentation Tab of the Implementation project - not even dependent on running SA_PROJECT_UPGRADE transaction
    If you indeed run this transaction - in foreground or background, and later check the Implementation Project, it would not highlight that node as having undergone any change. However, if you double click the document itself, you'd be pleasantly surprosed that it opens the most updated version you maintained in the Template Project. No need for 'Compare and Adjust'.
    (2) In Test Cases Tab - any change you make to Test Document in Template Project is again instantly available for the Implementation Project that had inherited the document, provided no manual changes were done to that document in the Implementaiton Project directly. Again, no need to run SA_PROJECT_UPGRADE transaction or the subsequent 'Compare and Adjust' function
        2a) If, however, the Test Document was altered in Implementation Project subsequently, the chain gets broken (in my understanding so far), and any subsequent changes made in Template Project does not become 'instantly' visible in Implementation Project - the two behave as though they are different documents
              In such a case, if you desire to 'restore' the supremacy of Template Project's contents, run SA_PROJECT_UPGRADE transaction, and after the background job finishes, visit Implementation Project concerned. The node where the Documents differ is not highlighted (unfortunately).  However, if you are aware of that node, and hit  'Compare and Adjust' button the ensuing Window does tell you with a # sign on the right hand panel that the Document has indeed changed in the original. You can 'adjust' that and save.
    Once this is done, and also you vow to not change the document in Implementation Project directly, the link between the two is kind of re-established. Any subsequent alterations you make in the Test Case at Template Project would be instantly visible from Implementation Project, as before !
    I have tried to explain precisely what I experiemented and found. I hope this works consistently
    The ways in which Document linkages are established and pointers to KW object IDs work is rather inscrutable for me, without ABAP support.
    I'll update any further findings here.
    Please keep a watch.
    Thanks and regards,
    Srini

  • Captivate 8 - How to change to producing "project.json" file instead of a "project.txt" file?  Having issues with viewing published projects due to this.

    Captivate 8 - How to change to producing "project.json" file instead of a "project.txt" file?  Having issues with viewing published projects due to this.   Would be thankful fo rany/all advice.

    I'm having the same issue. I've been able to work around it by opening the txt file and copying the contents. Then I open a new file in Sublime Text 2, paste the contents and save the new file as "project.json". It seems to work, but it'd been nice if I didn't have to do this everytime I publish a new project.

  • Changing owner on GPO give error

    My account is in Group Policy Creator Owners and can create GPOs fine.  I can modify permissions via the Delegation tab as well.  But when I go to try and change the owner of a policy, I get:
    Unable to set owner on <GUID>. The parameter is incorrect.
    It shows me having Modify Owner access on this policy so why would this not work for me?  Thanks.
    BTW, a Domain Admin can change this with no error.

    Hi,
    >>If you are saying to give Group Policy Creator Owners access to modify the owner of all GPOs, that is not acceptable in this environment.
    I am saying that we can just edit access control list of the GPO that we want to change its owner but not all GPOs.
    >>Seems to me if you are the owner of an object, you should be able to change this but that is not happening with GPOs in our case.
    Please follow the advice (giving the create owner
    change owner permission) I provided in the last reply to see if the issue persists.
    TechNet Subscriber Support
    If you are TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback here.
    Best regards,
    Frank Shen

  • Query - Change Owner

    Can we change the owner of a query. Since we have security setup that only the owner can modify we will run into situations where an employee is leaving the company but someone else is taking over their query.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    You can not change Owner of a Query...
    You can try this:
    First save existing Query with different technical name by required developer/user.Then delete old(original Query)..now save that Query with the same original tech name and delete old one..
    For example:you have a Query with tech name 'ZQUERY'.
    1.Save this Query as 'ZQUERY1' and delete 'ZQUERY'.
    2.Now save 'ZQUERY1' as 'ZQUERY' and delete 'ZQUERY1'.
    If you Perform 2nd step with required User ID,You will have desired Owner for this Query..
    Hope this helps.

  • Aperture 2.1.2 crashes every time I change to »All Projects«

    Help, do you know this problem?
    I have 10K pics in Aperture, mostly RAW and never had any big problems.
    But now I wanted to change between the Project mode and Aperture crashes after a short time of »spinning wheel«.
    Thanks für your help.

    So.... after bringing my 1st Gen. MBP into the local Apple service center - they suggested that the HD went bad. In fact they further informed me that the stock 80 Gig drives in these things was known for many issues. With that, they replaced the drive - and like magic.... My computer is up and running at full speed once again. Believe it or not, the bad drive was impacting Soooooooo many different problems that I had been suffering with - including the ability for my File Vault in Aperture to backup properly!

  • When we change owner of a task or a request is any log maintained anywhere

    HI ,
    When we change owner of a task or a request is any log maintained anywhere
    suppose we want to check who were the owners of a particular task is there a table which
    saves this change informatiion ,also when we transport a request to say  QA then in QA will
    the individual tasks be present or only the request .
    Thanks

    Hello
    The owner of a request or task is stored in E070-AS4USER. For this table there is no change log active (obviously).
    Thus, you will not find this change of the request/task anywhere except you define it yourself.
    Regards
      Uwe

  • I shared my project and saved it as .mov but when i reopen the fcp the project is one big clip, and now i cant re-edit the video, cant see all the clips, just one big clip,,,pls help, i need to make some changes to the project..thanx

    I shared my project and saved it as .mov but when i reopen the fcp the project is one big clip, and now i cant re-edit the video, cant see all the clips, text's, effects, etc..... just one big clip,,,pls help, i need to make some changes to the project..thanx

    Hi Stephen, thanx...
    Yes, we are talking about FCP X...this is the thing:
    I worked on a project a few days ago and went to share - export movie.
    Today, i opened the FCP again, to make some changes, and when i enter to the project, it shows me as one big clip.....i dont see it says compound clip....and i tried anyways pressing break appart clips...but nothing....could it be that i made it compound before exporting it..? if so how can i recover the un-compound version >?
    I tried to import the saved .mov file, but it opens the same....as one long clip...
    Pls help...thanx.

Maybe you are looking for