Change "Quality of Service" EOIO to EO for a XI Purache Interface in EBP

Hello Colleagues,
we have a PO interface in place but some problems with Message processing at Adapter. To solve the problem we try to change the Quality of Server EOIO to EO but the Quality of Service comes from the EBP system at XML Message header.
Please, in that location on the EBP system are we able to change the Quality of Service?
Many thanks in advance!
Jochen

Hi Barry,
The EBP system send POs (also calalog messages) via integration engine (SXMB_MONI on EBP) to the XI system (Integration Server) and the XI system sends the messages out to the Vendor via SOAP.
The messages which are send by EBP are with QOS EOIO at message header.
Regards,
Jochen

Similar Messages

Changing Quality of Service in Receiver Adapter

Hi,
We have a scenario where hundreds of messages for the same interface is sent to XI and written to one file on the receiver side. We do not want to change the QOS (Quality of Service) to EOIO (Exactly Once in Order) on the sender side nor do we want to use BPM due to performance issues.
Is there any way to change the QOS to EOIO after the mapping is complete?
I tried changing the QOS (DeliverySemantics) using a adapter module on the receiver adapter. In the audit log, I can see that the QOS has been changed to EOIO and assigned to the correct ConversationId, but the messages does not follow the EOIO process.
Any help is great appreciated.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Duke

Here is more detail on the scenario.
Hundreds of messages come into XI from R/3. One message is split into multiple messages by using the Extended Interface Determination. These messages are written to a file (each message has its own file). The file adapter is set to append.
The issue we are facing is that when hundreds of messages are processed simultaneously, it triggers an error when attempting to write to the file (locking issues). It then has to wait and retry, which adds to total processing time. Due to the time sensitivity of these interfaces and the errors that are raised, we would like to change the QOS to EOIO on the receiver side (when it writes to the file) so that it does not have to wait and retry.
The Maintain Order at Runtime is checked in the Interface Determination. Once it gets to the adapter framework to write to the file, it has a QOS of Exactly Once, which is carried over from the sender.
We do not want to change the QOS on the sender side, but only on the receiver side.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Duke
Edited by: Duke on May 29, 2008 5:11 PM

Change Quality of Service Message

Hello,
I've a interface IDOC - JDBC. The quality of Service is EOIO.
II want to change this quality to EO
How can i do it? Where?
thank very much,

I think you receiver determination have multiple messages (i.e branching of the messages in interface determination) as a result quality of service changed to EOIO..
In order to make EO for the same remove the check box option Maintain order at runtime in interface determination for the same and try
HTH
Rajesh

XI3.0 - Quality of service EOIO file adapter

Hi,
I have a number of IDOCS that are sent from a WAS6.40 system using a qRFC queue. These IDOCS are then sent to a number of receivers and inbound interfaces.
A large number of the receivers are file adapters for which I would like to be able to disable the EOIO handling.
Is there anyway to amend the quality of service?
Regards
Ian

Hi Ian,
I was trying to check your scenario and ran into something that has really confused me...
The table on Xi which holds the interface determination s entries is SMPPREL3, now if you check the field QUALITY, its description says ...
Processing Sequence ('X' = EO, SPACE = EOIO)
and this field should correspond to 'maintain order at runtime' property of interface determination...
usually with ABAP "X" means selected and space means 'not selected'....
now can you see in this table for your particular entry and the value in this field....if it is space or 'X'....
May be this is just a "typo" by whoever created the table
Thanks,
Renjith

SAP PI: the quality of service EO vs. EOIO

Hello all,
I have a service (File -> XI -> RFC). If i use the quality of service "EOIO" in the file sender channel, the data from xml file could not be imported in backend system per RFC-call. If i use "EO"-Settings then the data could be saved in backend system without problem. Could someone tell, what is that problem? thx.
Best regards,
Fanglin

Hello Harisch,
i have read the discussion und tried to delete the messages using the following methods. It didn't work:
1. the report "RSXMB_CANCEL_MESSAGES": the message with Message-ID could not be found
2. the SMQ1, SMQ2 und SMQ3: the EOIO-Queue could not be listed.
In RWB there no options to cancel (or delete) the messages. I can only restart the first message:
Best regards,
Fanglin

RFC TO SOAP - Quality of Service

Hi,
i see that my RFC to SOAP test functioning properly. But in Exactly Once mode. In RFC Sender adapter and SOAP Receiver adapter there is no configuration tab to change "Quality of service".
Is it possible to change the mode?
Kind Regards,
PM

It is not possible to set the QoS at Channel leve for RFC receiver.
Have a look at this thread: tRFC & qRFC
for SOAP, look at this discussion: Re: In what QOS does the receiver SOAP adapter work BE or EO?
Regards
Ramesh
Edited by: Ramesh P on Dec 30, 2011 1:17 PM

Update custom IT0105 subtype via ESS change own data service

I created a custom communication subtype in infotype 0105. I would like to add this subtype to the Change Own Data service in ESS, service object name ChangeOwnDataApplication. This service does not appear to allow for the addition of custom subtyhpes from IT0105. Function module HRXSS_COD_SAVE_PERSONAL_DATA seems to limit the subtypes allowed from IT0105 to 0005, CELL, 0010, PAGR and 0020

I Agree to suresh. This service is the most simplest in terms of functionality but has been ruinedbecause of hardcoding done in the function modules used.
This service uses following RFCs
HRXSS_COD_DEQUEUE_PERNR
HRXSS_COD_ENQUEUE_PERNR
HRXSS_COD_ERROR_HANDLING
HRXSS_COD_GET_DETAILS
HRXSS_COD_MODIFY
HRXSS_COD_READ
HRXSS_COD_SAVE
HRXSS_COD_SAVE_PDATA
HRXSS_COD_SAVE_PERSONAL_DATA
HRXSS_COD_SAVE_PHOTO
In function HRXSS_COD_GET_DETAILS there is following hardcoding..
LOOP AT wiw_detail_table INTO wa.
    IF wa-fieldname = 'GEBNR' OR wa-fieldname = 'ZIMNR'
       OR wa-fieldname = 'KFZKZ'.
      CONCATENATE p0032_prefix wa-fieldname INTO wa-fieldname.
      APPEND wa TO detail_table.
    ELSEIF wa-fieldname = 'TEL_EXT' OR wa-fieldname = 'TEL_NR'
       OR wa-fieldname = 'EMAIL'.
      CONCATENATE p0105_prefix wa-fieldname INTO wa-fieldname.
      APPEND wa TO detail_table.
    ELSEIF wa-fieldname = 'P0032-GEBNR' OR wa-fieldname = 'P0032-ZIMNR'
           OR wa-fieldname = 'P0032-KFZKZ'
           OR wa-fieldname = 'SYHR_A_P0105_AF_TEL_EXT'
           OR wa-fieldname = 'SYHR_A_P0105_AF_TEL_NR'
           OR wa-fieldname = 'SYHR_A_P0105_AF_EMAIL'
           OR wa-fieldname = 'SYHR_A_P0105_AF_CELL'
           OR wa-fieldname = 'SYHR_A_P0105_AF_FAX'
           OR wa-fieldname = 'SYHR_A_P0105_AF_PAGR'.
      APPEND wa TO detail_table.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
The above doesn't allow the function to read any custom value so if you require to add custom subtypes then you need to deal with them differently.
We have taken following approach.
we made copy of HRXSS_COD_GET_DETAILS and read the custom subtypes.
We made sure that these fields are read and displyed on the standard webdynpro service by modifying it usign NWDI.
For saving the data the standard application calls
HRXSS_COD_MODIFY
HRXSS_COD_SAVE
If you want to save the custom fields then you need to take following route
create copy of above function modules and use instances xss_adapter for respective infotypes if you want to update only 105 or 0032 related fields.
If you have custom fields from infotype 32 and 105 then you may not need to even copy the above function modules.
All cod based RFC has DETAIL_TABLE as import or export parameter. Insert the respective vaules of custom fields(subtypes) that you get from copy of HRXSS_COD_GET_DETAILS.
The above will resolve the issue of adding custom fields (0032) and custom subtypes (0105) to change own data service.
The effort for adding fields is not too high but then unless you understand the details its not simple.
THERE IS NO WAY THAT THIS FIELDS CAN BE ADDED ON SCREEN BY CONFIG WE COULD IDENTIFY. IF SOMEONE DOES THEN PLEASE SHARE.
Edited by: Barin Desai on Nov 11, 2009 8:26 PM

EOIO Quality of Service

Hi guys,
We have developed a File-XI-Idoc scenario, which works fine.
The problem is that we want each file that is found in the folder where XI reads files, to be processed first and the corresponding Idoc that is produced from the mapping to be posted in receiver R/3 system first.
In order to achieve that we have used EOIO QoS in processing parameters of sender file communication channel. Although, files are processed by XI one by one, since they are put in the same queue, it is not guaranteed that Idocs are posted to R/3 in the same sequence,
We had a case that Idocs were posted exactly at the same time in receiver R/3 system and the one that should be processed second was processed first. The second Idoc (that should be processed first) was locked due to concurrent modification of the same material.
Is there something else that I can do in receiver Idoc adapter, for example??
Evaggelos

Use the Queue Processing option of the receiver Idoc channel
Queue Processing
If the function module IDOC_INBOUND_IN_QUEUE is to be used, set the relevant indicator. It is used for IDocs that are serialized by queues (quality of service is EOIO). This module is only available in SAP Web AS 6.40 and higher. If it is not available, the function module IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS is called. The indicator only takes effect in SAP systems Releases 4.0 and higher. Calls for the queue processing function module are placed in the qRFC queue.
Regards,
Prateek

Sender JMS Adapter with EOIO Quality of Service

Hi,
I have a sender JMS adapter with a quality of service as EOIO. In the SAP help it says that I need to specify the "Processing J2EE Cluster Server (Cluster ID)". Just wondering how I get this value? Does anyone have an example?
Thanks,
Krishneel

Hi,
Please go through the bleow Wiki:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/FAQ+J2EEJMS+Adapter
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/f4/2d6189f0e27a4894ad517961762db7/content.htm
Thanks,
satya

Quality Of Service (BE,EOIO)...FIFO

Hi,
SAP XI has the concept of Quality of Service wherein they have BE, EOIO,EO.
Please can anyone tell me is this associated to a queue or a message. Also, if asociated to a Queue, where in SAO can we do this setting of making a Queue BE or EOIO.
And how do we associate a message to a particular queue?
Do we have the concept of FIFO..is this realted to Quality of service??
Please can anyone clear my doubt.
Thanks

Bhavesh,
I don't see any options available in RFC Sender adapter and in HTTP Receiver adapter to select the quality of service.
Do you know how to select that option? I know that once I select that option I need to mention a queue name.
We are at XI 3.0 SP14.
Please let me know ASAP.
Thanks
Kalyan

HT204053 I have iPad 2 and recently changed my Internet Service Provider and email address. I have created a new Apple I.D. and password but when I try to access or open my iPad 2 I am asked for the password for my previous email address.

I have iPad 2 and recently changed my Internet Service Provider and email address. When I switch on the iPad I am asked for my password for
my previous providerwhich when entered is not acceptable. I am told to create a new passord but this only changes the password for my current
address. I am now unable to access iPad and I need to know how to circumvent this.

Roger, thank you. I wish I had sent out this question a month ago, when I committed the folly of creating another apple id with my alternate email address. Since then, I had realized that I didn't seem to need it, hence today's post.
So now what do I do? Is there anyway to delete that unecessary apple id?
And it is even worse than that...the secondary address listed currently in our apple id is a mobile me one that my husband created, but never uses, never checks, and probably doesn't even remember the password for.

Quality of service in Receiver file/ftp adapter (SAP PI 7.1)?

Hi,
    We are building an IDoc to File scenario in SAP PI 7.1, where a single incoming idoc will create three different output files. Also files must be created in target server in a specific order.
    Our first idea to ensure that files would be created following a specific order was that Message mapping (in Java) build target payload with all three files following expected sequence.
    In addition, receiver file/ftp adapter is setup with a dynamic variable to create each file with a different filename adding also timestamp.
    Testing the scenario, we see that three files are created in target server but when we sort them by creation date, it seems they don't follow always same sequence.
    Sometimes adapter creates File1, File2, File3; next time it created File2, File1, File3 and so on.
    Our problem is that files must be created always with a specific order and we cannot use BPM. Does anyone know if a receiver file/ftp adapter can be setup to create files following specific sequence (EOIO)?
    I know that sender file/ftp adapter can be setup with a quality of service, but I didn't find anything similar for Receiver file/ftp adapter.
    Suggestions will be welcome.
Kind Regards,
Aitor

Hi,
     First, thanks all of you for your quick answers. They were helpful because we learnt a new configuration setting.
     We tried your suggestions but they didn't really fix our problem.
     Finally interface has been re-designed and we will not have to apply this logic, so no issue from our side.
     However, let me continue with this topic in case that somebody else will have the same issue, then it will be able to review this thread.
     When adapter created the files in the target directory (windows server), files had the expected timestamp in each filename. However, if we sorted windows directory contents by "Date Creation", files were sorted different that timestamp shows in the filename.
     For example, adapter created following files:
File1_20090325-115117-169
File2_20090325-115117-174
File3_20090325-115117-180
     But when we sorted windows folder contents, files were sorted as follows:
File2_20090325-115117-174
File1_20090325-115117-169
File3_20090325-115117-180
     It seems that timestamp was pre-assigned by the adapter, but when adapter created the files, it did it with a temporary name and finally assigns the filename. If a file size was bigger than other, maybe it takes more time and windows creation date is higher.
     If so, it means that adapter is not following same instructions as itu2019s indicated in "maintain order at runtime" checkbox.
     Do you know if there is any way where we can push also the order in the adapter as we did in interface determination?
Regards,
Aitor

How does the quality of service in India compare to the United States?

I am currently in India and 12 hours from the closest Apple service center in Delhi. After the monsoon rains started my computer started acting up. At first some keys seemed to stick and I was able to solve the problem by attaching a USB keyboard. Lately the computer started crashing and then having trouble starting up again (an internet search suggests this could be a problem with the RAM). If I left the computer for a while it would start up and operate well for a bit but eventually crash again.
I took the computer into a computer repair shop here and he said that I should wait (3 months) until I go back to the United States rather than go through the trouble of traveling to Delhi to get the computer repaired. He also said that the quality of repairs is much better in the US. For example, in India they will put in second hard refurbished hardware whereas in the US they will use new hardware. The repairs in India will also take much longer than it would in the US. He recommended I get a cheap PC from him to use while I am here and get my mac repaired when i get back to the United States, he would then buy the computer back when I left.
I was wondering if anybody could share their experience or knowledge of the quality of service in India. Thank you.

And another quote from the fine manual:
Re Slideshow:
Rendering Preview Images
Aperture renders preview images in four situations:
When a library is upgraded—provided that the “Create previews for existing images” checkbox is selected in the Welcome to Aperture dialog
When an image is imported, or a version is created, rotated, or adjusted—provided that the Maintain Previews item is selected in the Library Action pop-up menu (with a gear icon)
When you Control-click the library, a project, or an image selection and choose Update Previews from the shortcut menu
Immediately before a slideshow, if the previews are not up to date, and the slideshow preset uses the Best quality setting
When rendering a group of preview images, Aperture uses the current application preference settings for compression quality and picture size, not the settings that were specified when preview rendering began. For example, if you have the quality set to 6, and then halfway through rendering you change the setting to 8, the previews that have not yet been rendered will be compressed at setting 8. Previously rendered previews are unaffected.
So, a high quality slideshow will require high quality previews, and indeed Aperture will render previews before rendering a slideshow, if the preview quality is not sufficient.
Regards
Léonie

How to determine quality of service of communication between XI and R/3

Hi All,
Suppose we are sending data through R/3 to XI using outbound abap proxy to XI. My query is how do we determine which quality of service (EO or EOIO) will be used for this communication. I have seen normally it is EO ( or BE, in case we are using execute_synchrounous function).

Q0S:
http://help.sap.com/saphelpnw04/helpdata/en/41/b714fe5ffc11d5b3ea0050da403d6a/frameset.htm
adapter types and QoS:
http://help.sap.com/saphelpnw04/helpdata/en/0d/5ab43b274a960de10000000a114084/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelpnw04/helpdata/en/ae/d03341771b4c0de10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelpnw04/helpdata/en/7b/94553b4d53273de10000000a114084/frameset.htm

Need some clarifications on Quality-of-services

Hi Everybody.
I need some clarification on Quality-of-services.the question is which one is better in Quality-of-services (Exactly-Once or Exactly-Once-In-order)?why?wht is the differenc between them?

Hi Narayana
refer the below Urls
make the QOS of file as EO or EOIO and then use this blog,
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
It depends upon the Adapter,Can you please spicific
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/41/b714fe5ffc11d5b3ea0050da403d6a/content.htm
Check these blogs written on QoS:
XI Asynchronous Message Processing: Understanding XI Queues
How to deal with stuck EOIO messages in the XI 3.0 Adapter Framework
EO = Exactly Once ( Used in Asynchronous Communication)
EOIO = Exactly Once In Order ( Used in Asynchronous Communication)
BE = Best Effort ( Used in Synchronous Communication)
Best Effort --> Used for Synchronous Calls.
EO and EOIO --> Asynchronous Calls.
EOIO --> Asynchronous with Sequential Processing Guranteed.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/41/b714fe5ffc11d5b3ea0050da403d6a/frameset.htm
For the QOS, u can refer the following library links .
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/41/b714fe5ffc11d5b3ea0050da403d6a/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ae/d03341771b4c0de10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
For receiver channels QoS BE (Best Effort) will result in a
synchronous call (sRFC) , QoS EO (Exactly Once) will create a
transactional call (tRFC) to the BC. For sender channels a synchronous
call (sRFC) will result in a message with QoS BE, a transactional call
(tRFC) will result in a message with QoS EO.
QoS EOIO is not supported by the BC-Adapter.
SAP XI term Quality of service describing how the transmission and process-ing of messages is to be handled. Possible values are:
BE = BestEffort (synchronous call, no transactional guarantees for transmission and processing)
EO = ExactlyOnce (asynchronous call, guarantee for local transactional handling, exactly-once transmission and exactly-once processing)
EOIO = ExactlyOnceInOrder (as for EO but with serialization guarantee on a given queue name).
Pls reward if useful

Change "Quality of Service" EOIO to EO for a XI Purache Interface in EBP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for