Change Shipment Costs [VI02]:costs are not spread against all PO line items

The Finance department is correcting the shipment cost for all inbound deliveries from overseas via Change Shipment Costs via transaction VI02.
They expect the change to be always spread across all line items, however it happens often that the shipping costs are posted only against the last Purchase Order line items.
The Purchase Order contains 7 lines that are variants but only last line shows the Shipping cost in the Purchase Order History.
I am trying to understand what are the components that drive the distribution of shipping cost across the original Purchase Order.
And where the error lie, ie: user procedure or configuration.
For Inbound Shipments:
Item category shipment costs Z001 has been created in t.code T_71 linked to Item determination procedure group Z001.
Pricing procedures ZTRSSC has been created
And pricing procedure determination for shipment costs T_73 has been set up for transportation planning point 1610 and 1630.
Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Richard

Hi,
we have tried to use the header level setting, but this is only to use the condition as a header condition.
For example, if we have 50 EUR for head condition in an PO, each PO item gets this 50 EUR. We want a "global" condition for all PO items.

Similar Messages

You are not authorized to call up line item display (FB03)

Hi,
actually; I am facing a problem; one user is getting error message "You are not authorized to call up line item display" when he is trying to view the payment usage of document no in FB03 transaction code.
I have checked and found that user is already having display access for the company code which he is putting under company code field.
Also as per the SU53 screen shot; it is showing
Authorization check failed for S_CTS_ADMI
Field - CTS_ADMFCT
for - TABL
I have not run the trace yet..
Kindly advice on what could be the problem and solution for that...
Many thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Anuj

> Also as per the SU53 screen shot; it is showing
>
> Authorization check failed for S_CTS_ADMI
> Field - CTS_ADMFCT
> for - TABL
Total Questions: 8 (6 unresolved)
Good match!

Purchasing Groups not defaulting to all new line items

Hi,
We are on SRM 4.0. currently, we can only assign a user to one purchasing group.Now my problem is Purchasing Groups not defaulting to all new line items (when changed in default settings).If any one faced this problem help me out.
regards,
sobhan

Sobhan,
Depending on your material group, the purchaing group will be defaulted. According to the responsibility tab and SPRO Config define objects in the backend system, the purchaing group will default in your basic data of the shopping cart screen.
Even though in your default settings you will assign a Purchaing group, the purchasing group will be defaulyed on the basis of the above two crietrias mentioned.
Please assigbn points for usefull answer !!
Sundeep

The vendor code is not coming against some Assignment line items with the

Hi All,
While executing t.code FBL3N,the vendor code is not coming against some Assignment line items with the GL A/C4607000, some line items it is coming.
The GL A/c 4607000 is GR/IR clearing a/c.
Please let us know why this situation is happeing at the time of FBL3N.
Thanks
Ram

HI,
By activating the special fields you can the vendor number, but use the new reprot called "FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New) ".
First go to SPRO> Financial Accounting (New)> General Ledger Accounting (New)--> Master Data > G/L Accounts>Line Items --> Define Special Fields for Line Item Display
Click on New Entries -
Table - BSEG - Field - LIFNR
Save. Now execute the report - FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New)
Give the gl account number and execute.
After getting the line items list from menu select --Settings --> Special Fields --> Click on New Entries --> Enter Table BSEG, Field Name LIFNR.
After this come back and execute again. It will give you the vendor number.
Thanks & Regards,
Shashi Kanth.

MIRO - Business Area not getting updated in Vendor Line item

Hello friends,
I am posting Vendor invoice in MIRO transaction.
After Posting if i see the financial document generated,
Business area has not got updated in Vendor Line item.
What could be the problem ?
Please help me out.
Hari Prasath

Hi Kale,
Make sure the field Business area is not supressed in tx. OB14. for the GL account in line item 001.
On the other hand, have a look to the note and kba below:
41294 - Business area in customer/vendor item
Kba 1727802 - Business area not getting populated in sales/ purchase tax

Actual cost are not updating in prodcutcost collectors ( KKF6N) - Variances

Hi SAP's
We are facing the problem with the Variance calculation for product cost collectors.
The issue is When we are calulating the Variances for prodcut cost collectors the actual costs are not ( For few materials of BOM) updating.
Because of these the variances are showing high.....If I settele this variances to COPA, my copa report is will be going wrong.....
Please help me to comeout of this problem.
Thanks in Advance
PrasadReddyS
FICO Consulatnt

Hi Anand
Please add the budget profile at Plant maintenance order level no need to add any substitution rule
budget should also be control at order level
Thanks
trinath

In make to order cycle semifinished costs are not appearing in itemisation

Hi
We are facing a problem in Make to order. When a production order is created with respect to a sales order, semifinished costs are not appearing in Itemisation or cost component structure of Production order.
In other cases like make to stock and planning with final assembly costs are appearing. we are checking costs at CO02 - goto menu- costs - itemization.
Please provide us solution for this problem.
Thanks and regards,
Deepa

Hi
Please check 'Cost component Structure' Attribute details data for the semifinished component.
In that chek for 'Rollup cost' and also check for 'Filter Criteria for cost component views on Itemization' properly.
Regards
Laxmiprasad
Apart from above pls check for semifinished product in material master in costing1 view for material origin check box, check it if not selected.
Regards
Laxmiprasad
Edited by: Laxmiprasad Pagidala on Jan 22, 2008 2:03 PM

HALB costs are not shown in Itemisation for Make to order

Hi
We are facing a problem in Make to order. When a production order is created with respect a sales order, semifinished costs are not appearing in Itemisation or cost component structure of Production order.
In other cases like make to stock and planning with final assemble costs are appearing.
Please provide us solution for this problem.
Thanks and regards,
Deepa

Hi,
Please check with Costing relevancy ind for Semei material at "General data Tab" in component over view of Production order (co02)
Do u mean to say for same sale order material Number , semi material cost will not be added forPG20 and is added for PG 10 at Prod order.Please confirm
Regads
Pradeep

Unit Cost is not Populating in Sales Order Line Level for OPM Enabled Org

Dear All,
This is to inform you that Unit Cost is not populating in Sales Order Lines. Ideally it should pick from OPM financials, but whenever i am running Cost Update it is throwing error. We need to pull out Unit Cost for Sales Analysis Report. Please suggest on the same ASAP. What are the steps needs be followed to populate the Unit Cost. Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards,
Patrick

Hi
I think it will pick from PRICE list. Why don't to you try by keeping this item in the mentioned Price list.
Regards
Raj

I created a slide show in imovie for my daughters 21st with voice overs from friends and family which was all working fine but now the voice recordings are not playing at all. Obviously some setting has changed but I can't find which one.

I created a slide show in imovie for my daughters 21st with voice overs from friends and family which was all working fine but now the voice recordings are not playing at all. Obviously some setting has changed but I can't find which one.

I created a slide show in imovie for my daughters 21st with voice overs from friends and family which was all working fine but now the voice recordings are not playing at all. Obviously some setting has changed but I can't find which one.

The "always allow" button is grayed out in settings regarding cookies, and I can not find where to change the setting. (Restrictions are not on.)

The "always allow" button is grayed out in settings regarding cookies, and I can not find where to change the setting. (Restrictions are not on.) Do you know where I go to change the setting to allow me to "always allow" cookies?

Hi lisaarnett111,
If you are having issues turning on Always Allow for cookies in Safari on your iPad, you may want to check to make sure that you don't have Private Browsing enabled, as noted in the following article:
Turn Private Browsing on or off on your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch - Apple Support
Regards,
- Brenden

My changes to a duplicated page are not syncing up in the Creative Cloud. How can I fix this?

I'm using Adobe Proto on an iPad. I created one page and successfully viewed it in the Creative Cloud. Then I duplicated that 1st page so I could work on the next page in that project. I made some changes to the 2nd page and then synced the project with the Creative Cloud again.
Once I try to view the 2nd page in the Creative Cloud, it's still an exact copy of the 1st page. In other words, my changes on the 2nd page don't show up. I've tried synching the project many times and I get the same result. Tried opening the project from another browser, same result.
My changes to a duplicated page are not syncing up in the Creative Cloud. How can I fix this?
Thank you.

Yes, I'm 99% certain the project is being synced. If I duplicate more than the one page so that I end up with more than 2 pages, I still see every single page that I duplicated and made changes as the initial version of the page.
I duplicated that 1st page again so that I have 3 pages. I made changes to the 3rd one and I'm still not seeing those changes when I look at the page in Creative Cloud. I see the new, 3rd page, so that should mean the project is being synced, correct?

Email changes on iPad via IMAP are not updating on Exchange Server

I have set up IMAP access to my company email from the iPad. Reason being so that I can manage emails (delete, move to folders etc) whilst working off-line.
Seemed to work fine for a day or so but now any changes made via the iPad are not syncing and updating the Exchange Server once back on-line.
Any hints?

I see. okay, well, on my iphone with iOS 3.x I always saw similar issues. I had email on 2 Exchange servers, so one of the accounts had to be IMAP, and it never worked properly.
Yes, it would mark emails as being read, etc, but anytime I moved or deleted an email, it would do so, but would also keep a copy on the original mailbox it was in. Basically the IMAP "Expunge" command wasn't properly being sent by the iPhone
I submitted this as a bug to Apple via bugreporter.apple.com and they confirmed it. Whether it's fixed or not in iOS 4 I don't know as iOS 4 has the ability to use multiple Exchange accounts so I no longer need the IMAP.

No cost booking against sales order+line item once accontng release is done

Dear all,
I want to stop all cost bookings against a sales order + line item once the accounting release for that item has been done.
By cost booking i mean, all such transactions that are done for a sales order + line item that involve cost booking. Like, MB1A should not allow any goods issue against that sales order + item once accounting release is done.
Is it possible to that in sales order? Like by using any status at item level.
Please guide.
regards
SAPshed

Hi Ajay,
We have not kept automatic cost estimate marking during saving of sales order as costing dept wants to confirm whether costing for the SO is correct or not.
Hence we have to use CK51N.
Now the problem is for any change in any line item of a sales order is changing the costing status from "VO" to "KA" for all line items of the given sales order in table KEKO.
This is causing measure problem as production people are facing problem while making any change in production order as already there is a check put in CO02 that if cost estimate does not exist for underlying sales order, then change in production order should not be allowed.
Similarly production order creation (converting planned order to production order) is getting held up.
Costing user has to repeated run CK51N for all line items of a single sales order if there is any change in any single line item of the sales order.
Hence pl. help and suggest as to what is to be done now.
Regards
Ratna

You are not a receiver of the work item in ESS Leave

Hi,
We are using standard ESS leave application in our portal, where employee can raise leave and his manager can approve/reject his leave. But I want in case manager rejects the leave, the rejected leave should not come into MSS UWL of employee, we will send a mail to employee and he can again login to ESS leave application and where he will see the rejected leave and he can re apply/change/delete the rejected leave. We do not want rejected leave to come in UWL of employee as a work item.
As of now when manager rejects the leave rejected leave of an employee , it is coming in UWL of the employee which we do not want, so what we did, we went to standard leave work flow template WS12300111, in that we double clicked on Task (TS12300116, Process Request by Employee) and in that we clicked on agent assignment icon and than we clicked on attribute and we selected General forwarding not allowed radio button, by default general task radio button was selected.
After selecting General forwarding not allowed radio button, even when manager rejects employee leave, rejected leave is not coming in UWL of employee which we want exactly, but another error is coming when employee goes to ESS leave application again and change or delete this rejected leave he is getting the error You are not a receiver of the work item .
But if we select general task radio button in agent assignment in work flow , than eveything is working fine but employee is getting rejected leave in his UWL, that we do not want at all, so why after selecting different radio button this error is coming ?
Why employee is getting this error, why employee can not reapply/change his rejected leave. Is this portal error OR workflow error OR HR configuration error and what is the solution for this..

If you need this option then you need to change the WF Task.
General Forwarding Not Allowed
This indicator enables you to determine that work items for this task can only be forwarded to users who are agents for the task.
If this indicator is not set, a work item for this task can be forwarded to all users.
The best way to take care of User
Forwaring authorization is the Task Classification (PFTC -> Additional
Data -> Classification). Classify tasks with General Forwarding Not
allowed, will give you the oppotunity to let the user allow to forward
items JUST to the Possible Agents Assigned to the task
(Additional Data -> Agent Assingment -> Maintain)...
Clear that everything depends on How you have developed your workflows
definitions. In that cases the best think to do is
create Different Tasks definition (TSxxxxxx) and let they start
depending on Company Code (That can be driven via Conditions steps in
the workjflow definition, for example). This will allow you to define
Just the responsible Agents per each task, depending on the Companny
Code. This definitively Resolve the Forwarding frelated Question.

Change Shipment Costs [VI02]:costs are not spread against all PO line items

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for