Change the Settlement Rule

Hi Experts,
In the settlement rule for the Process orders, the system creating the rules with the category 'OIT' (Order Item)  but i want it to be changed to 'MAT' (Material) how and where do i change the same. i know that it cant be changed in Settlement rule for the Order.
thanks
Regards
Suresh

Hi rasuresh,
When I read down the the comments all the way down and back to your question, one question arise in my mind, why do you want to change the settlement rule to be MAT?
You said the your order is a Process Order, meaning that in one process order it can generate more than one out put. Please check the material master of your product via MM03 on MRP2. Check, is the co-product indicator activated? If yes, then click on tab Joint Production icon. There, in the joint production indicator showing what items will be produced during processing of the products.
By indicator Joint product, by default the receiver Item category will be set to OIT in the settlement rule. What you see in the distrubution rule receiver are the proportion of cost based on setting of joint production in the MRP view 2.
I don't think, this is as a problem. It is as what should be as a process order.
It would be different if your order is Production Order or order type PP01, then the receiver will be MAT
Hope this help you.
Best regards,
Irhasni

Similar Messages

  • Update was terminated received from author in sap iw32(During changing the settlement rule)

    Hi,
    I am getting an error "Express Document 'Update Was Terminated' Received from Author" when i am adding the settlement receiver. New settlement receiver is from period 03.2015. changed the ref object(functional location) and the tried to add the settlement receiver.
    ST22 details
        Trigger Location of Runtime Error
        Program                                 SAPLCOZV
        Include                                   LCOZVU23
        Row                                       86
        Module type                           (FUNCTION)
        Module Name                        CO_ZV_CONSISTENCY_CHECK
    need help.

    Hi Tilak,
    This is due to status inconsistency, kindly check SAP Notes, also if this is not the exact solution, raise a note to SAP.
    157070 - PM/SM order:DUMP_STATUS_INCONSYSTENCY_XXXX in savng
    Regards
    Terence

  • Changing the receiver cat in the settlement rule of Product cost collector

    Hi,
    I have created a Product cost collector using the Transaction - KKF6N. and observed that the settlement rule got created automatically with the CAT - MAT. I need help for below queries.
    1. Is it possible to change the settlement rule for the Product cost collector?
    2. If yes, Could you please let me know the procedure to do this?
    3. If no, what is the alternate as I want to change the CAT from MAT to ORD.
    Your help is very much appreciable and Thanks in advance for the help.

    Hi,
    Check in order type, Which settlement profile is  maintained. Then Goto settlement profile maintain receive type which you want to settle.
    Regards,
    Sreekanth

  • Itu00B4s possible to change the Distribution rules for a order type RM01 ??

    Hi Experts:
    I need to change the settlement rule which is automatic created at the moment  that you create a Cost colector (class order RM01) transaction KKF6N..
    but when I go into KKF6N transaction and I select the "change" option and after that I go into settlement rule screen, I can´t change the distribution rule.
    I would need to change the settlement type from "PER" value to "TOT" value.. It´is possible in this kind of Cost colectors??
    Thanks and regards!
    Manuel

    Hi,
       Please note that you will not be able to change manually the settlement rule for a cost collector. 
    When you save, the system creates a settlement rule for the product cost collector.
    The settlement rule for the product cost collector always specifies the distribution rule "100% to material" and the settlement type  is always PER (periodic).
    Also refer the note 388457 in which one of the paragraph it says "As of Release 4.5, a special settlement rule is generated when you create a product cost collector (with procedure 5: delivery value for product cost collector). You cannot subsequently change this settlement rule".
    regards
    Waman

  • User Exit for the Settle rule of a Production Order

    Hello all
    i got a requirement to change the settlement rule of a production order to multiple receivers.
    suppose i have the following rule
    Categeory | Settlement Reciever | Receiver Short text |   %   | Settlement Type | No | Source Assignment
        MAT             ZMDT89                   ZMDT88              100        FUL                 1            left as blank
    now my requirement is that i have to default the source assignment as 200 (Materials) so as to allow the other reciever entered with the same settlement type as FUL and also the No should be 2
    i.e. my req is like this
    Categeory | Settlement Reciever | Receiver Short text |   %   | Settlement Type | No | Source Assignment
        MAT             ZMDT89                   ZMDT88              100        FUL                 1            200
        G/L             G/L A/C no                G/L shor text       100        FUL                 2            100
    the bold one is i have to ADD
    the T-Code is CO02.
    your help is highly appreciated...
    thanks in advance

    hi,
    check these exits in co02.
    Transaction Code - CO02                     Change Production Order
    Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
    Enhancement
    PPCO0010                                Enhancement in make-to-order production - Unit of measure
    PPCO0012                                Production Order: Display/Change Order Header Data
    PPCO0013                                Change priorities of selection crit. for batch determination
    PPCO0015                                Additional check for document links from BOMs
    PPCO0016                                Additional check for document links from master data
    PPCO0017                                Additional check for online processing of document links
    PPCO0018                                Check for changes to production order header
    PPCO0019                                Checks for changes to order operations
    PPCO0021                                Release Control for Automatic Batch Determination
    PPCO0022                                Determination of Production Memo
    PPCO0023                                Checks Changes to Order Components
    STATTEXT                                Modification exit for formatting status text lines
    PPCO0009                                Enhancement in goods movements for prod. process order
    CCOWB001                                Customer exit for modifying menu entries
    COIB0001                                Customer Exit for As-Built Assignment Tool
    COZF0001                                Change purchase req. for externally processed operation
    COZF0002                                Change purchase req. for externally procured component
    PPCO0001                                Application development: PP orders
    PPCO0002                                Check exit for setting delete mark / deletion indicator
    PPCO0003                                Check exit for order changes from sales order
    PPCO0004                                Sort and processing exit: Mass processing orders
    PPCO0005                                Storage location/backflushing when order is created
    PPCO0006                                Enhancement to specify defaults for fields in order header
    PPCO0007                                Exit when saving production order
    PPCO0008                                Enhancement in the adding and changing of components
    reward points if hlpful.

  • How do I see the changes made in the settlement rule?

    Dear Experts,
    I would like to see the changes that was done in the settlement rule. I have perform the following:
    In the 'maintain settlement rule' screen in project builder (CJ20N) - Goto > Change Document > All Rules.
    The system gives message that 'no change documents found - message no KD128'.
    Q: Is there any difference between settlement rule and distribution rule?
    Q: Is there anywhere else that I need to do to get the change document in settlement rule or distribution rule?
    FYI - I have change the project profiles to include(tick) change document in the Basic Data and Status Management. I believe this is not relevant to change in settlement rule.
    I appreciate your help. Thanks.
    Regards

    Hi,
    Abt your first question,
    You need a settlement rule to carry out settlement. You define the settlement rule in the sender object. The settlement rule contains the distribution rules and the settlement parameters for a sender object.
    You can maintain the settlement rule for WBS elements or networks/activities in an overview screen. You use distribution rules to stipulate which proportions of the costs are to be settled to which receiver. Costs can be distributed on the basis of:
    1. Percentages
    2. Equivalence numbers
    3. Fixed amounts
    To check changes done , you can also check t code CN60.
    Regards
    Tushar

  • Doubt about the settlement rule of the Production ORder

    The only default distribution rule allowed for a PP order is PP1 or PP2.  We would need to change that to allow settlement to multiple receivers as a default. If that is the case, we may want to look into a user exit to update the settlement rule during production order creation instead so that the G/L account is correct from the beginning.
    Currently when we create the production order, the settlement rule will default the below, I am not sure if a user exit is able to maintain the Source as 200 (Materials)?
    If yes, we can then add the second rule for Source 100 (Labor and Mfg) via the user exit as well.
    In this case, SAP will not prompt us error of settlement with 200%, as they are from difference Sources.
    now anybody can explain me about the User EXit we have to correct this

    any help on this.. please its very urgent
    thanks in advance

  • Massive change of settlement rules in Sale order

    HI,
    CAN ANYONE ADVISE ME ON THIS TOPIC:
    I NEED TO "REFRESH"  THE PROFITABILITY SEGMENT IN THE SETTLEMENT RULES OF THE SALES ORDER, AS SOME OF THE CHARECHARISTICS WERE  CHANGED AND AS LONG AS I USE THE "OLD" SETTLEMENT RULES IT GIVES ME THE OLDER CHARECHATERISTICS.
    I WAS THINKING OF DOING A MASSIVE CHANGE TO SETTLEMET RULES - BLOCKING THE PREVIOUS  SETTLEMENT LINE AND OPEN A NEW ONE
    DOES ANYONE HAS AN IDEA OF HOW TO DO IT ?
    THANK YOU
    AMALIA

    Hi,
    1. Please check your customizing in SPRO -> Sales and Distribution -> Basic Functions-> Account Assignment/Costing -> Automatic generation of settlement rules.
    2. Have a derivation rule in COPA (KEDR) which will post the changed value to COPA during settlement. If the settlement rule is not automatically adjusted and if you don't change the old value afterwards manually on the profitability segment screen of the settlement rule final derivation (at time of creation of the CO-PA line item) would overwrite the wrong char value for the line item - without any impact on the settlement rule itself.
    regards
    Waman

  • Delet the settlement rule

    hi 
    How to delet the settlement rule , after realease project.
    if i check in settlement rule for Activity it will show all option in disply mode .
    thanks
    sunil

    Has settlement from the Network Activity already ran?
    On the settlement rule line ....check the values in the First Used & Last Used fields
    If both of these are not blank, then settlement has already ran.
    To delete you would need to undo each run of settlement to remove the date.
    If in Production this is probably not an option. Therefore you will need to end the existing settlement rule with an end date in end period & year.
    Then create new settlement rule.
    If both First Used and Last used are blank then I would try entering /SU53 into the command field to check for missing authorisations.
    I am automatically generating settlement rules from Activity to parent WBS and have no problem changing or deleting the settlement rule prior to settlement running.
    Steve

  • GR/IR expenses not affected with the settlement rule run process in the GL

    <i><b>Please neglect by previous post with the same title</b></i>
    There is a problem I face while running the settlement rule process related to internal orders on the GR/IR expenses.
    According to the internal order settlement rule every expense associated to an Internal order no. whether its an account payable or manual journal accounts it should be settled (distributed) on the cost centers specified in each internal order after the monthly settlement run process is done through T.Code "KO8G", and this actually happens on the entries that are booked manually through T.Code "FB50", but the GR/IR entries is the biggest problem, it didn't reflect the settlement rule distributions in the GL it just gives me the original transaction once its was automatically created through T.Code "MIGO" they are only allocated to a one profit center with no cost center and without being distributed to a multiple cost centers according to the distribution strategy.
    After a long search I found that the cost center distribution occurred only on a secondary none GL account named A&P Settlement (720010), all GR/IR expenses was settled correctly only on this account not through the ordinary GL accounts (e.g. Gifts, printed materials) and of course the correct distribution didn't appear in the GL,
    So is there a transaction or any way to allocate the GR/IR expenses to there correct cost centers with the correct cost element in the GL?
    Is there anything to do with the GR/IR calculation that depends on quantity base not value base?
    <i><b>The Process as follows:</b></i>
    (<b>1) Creating Internal order with a settlement rule (E.g. Cost center 1 (50%) Cost center 2 (50%)</b>
    <b>2) Creating a purchase order associated to an internal order</b>
    <b>3) The Goods received and creating the GR transaction T.Code "MIGO"</b>
    Acc/DR Expenses accounts
    Acc/CR GI/IR Account 400301
    Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
    Cost Center <blank>
    Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)
    <b>
    4) Closing the GR/IR accounts when receiving the invoice T.Code "MIRO"</b>
    <b>When we receive vendor invoice:</b>
    Acc/Dr GI/IR Account 400301
    Acc/Cr Vendor Account
    Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
    Cost Center <blank>
    Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)
    <b>5) Performing the Internal order settlement rule run process</b>
    <b>(N.B.</b> By entering the report of the cost center (Actual/Plan/ Variance) T.Code S_ALR_87013611
    I found that GR/IR expenses was not charged on the concerned cost centers as shown in the GL <b>)</b>
    <b>Your Reply is highly appreciated</b>

    Thanks for your kind reply,
    But is there a way solve this problem?
    And what is the use of leaving a field in the account assignment tab for an internal order while creating a PO and it will not take advantage of the settlement rule????????
    And as you know the internal order settlement is a way to create a multiple account assignment
    Can we solve the problem by making an automatic fake transaction that reverse the value of the GR/IR and creating another transaction can apply on it the settlement rule??
    You know that settlement rule process is one of the best features in the SAP system it save time and effort to make distributions manually

  • KO8G-sudden surge of error mess(Maintain the settlement rule of the sender)

    hi!
    we encountered a lot of error message(Maintain the settlement rule), more than 4k, after we run KO8G, this is the first time happened to us. when we checked the PM orders from the error message, most of it came from previous periods even previous years, which are already closed. we can understand if there are posting for the said order for the period, but there is none. why those closed orders with no postings, still read by the settlement? were having a diffuclty of checking it one by one, we only expect less than 100. we hope you can help us.
    thanks in advance
    vince

    Dear,
    As found...
    Maintain only the FROM DATE... Remove the TO DATE as 10.2010 (Extend the TO DATE)
    OR
    Create a new settlement rule which is valid in the Period of Execution of settlement
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Maintain the settlement rule of the sender error

    Dear Friends,
    Using T.code Ko88, The following data has been entered.
    Order :100010R.
    Settlement period - 11
    processing type - automatic
    Selected the Test run.
    When executed, the following error is displayed " Maintain the settlement rule of the sender" Message No: Message no. KD205
    Settlement rule was selected and the settlement rule was displayed.
    In the distribution rules, in the category FXA and GL are defined and in Settlement, it is Full and from and to date  is 10,2010.
    Please suggest how to solve the error?
    Regards
    Sridhar

    Hi
    Maintain only the FROM DATE... Remove the TO DATE as 10.2010 (Extend the TO DATE)
    OR
    Create a new settlement rule which is valid in the Period of Execution of settlement
    Br, Ajay M

  • Problem in maintaining the settlement rule in the maintenance order

    Dear Friends,
    I have a problem ,When  I am trying to maintain the settlement rule in the maintenance order ,I am getting information like below
    Decentralized system -> note settlement rule is not distributed
    Message no. /ISDFPS/PM124
    Diagnosis
    You navigated to the settlement rule.
    System Response
    The system informs you that a settlement rule can be created but that it will not be distributed to the target system. Settlement is carried out in the target system, where the order is usually settled to the WBS element of the operation.
    Can anyone throw some light on how this is happeing and remedy?
    Appreciating your early response

    Hello
    Please check
    TC --> KSR2_ORC
    Please maintain the Strategy Sequences for Automatic Generation of Settlement Rule.
    You define a strategy sequence for automatic generation of settlement rules for internal orders.
    Regards,
    Rakesh
    Edited by: RAKESH ASHOK MANE on Sep 3, 2010 12:37 PM

  • Validation for the settlement rule of a wbs element

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement that in which i have to validate the settlement rule of the wbs done through t-code cj01/cj02/cj07,cj20n.
    If the settlement receiver object is an G/L account (settlement category g/l )  then i have to check that if it is an o&m project type
    wbs element  settling on some already mentioned G/L e.g 0001081340,0001081341, then  it should through some error  like settlement rule not valid etc.
    I have tried cjb1/cjb2 through badi WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE by creating some strategy but it did not have any option for G/L
    settlement reciever. Also client will not agree to this as they want to create settlement rule manually.
    I have also tried the exit 'EXIT_SAPLCOI1_027 ' but its not getting triggerred during settlement rules assign mentand also i think it will not solve my purpose.
    Please help me as i am struck in this for long time now.
    Warm Regards,
    Hariom

    Hi Prabhu ,
    thanks for the quick update.
    I have tried many badi's and exits but they are not triggering at the saving time of the wbs.
    badi :
    PROJECTDEF_UPDATE
    WBS_FIELDS_FOR_ASSET
    WBS_USER_FIELDS_F4
    WORKBREAKDOWN_UPDATE
    WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE
    exits :
    EXIT_SAPLCJWB_004
    EXIT_SAPLCJWB_005
    EXIT_SAPLCJWB_001
    These above exits i have tried either they are not implemented or they are not triggered during saving of a wbs element.
    please suggest any exit or badi's which you may have used.
    Thanks and regards,
    Hariom

  • Getting error in KO01 when entering the Settlement rule

    Hi All,
    In KO01, I am trying to create a internal order and a settlement rule. I enter settlement reciever as another Internal order of anothe co. code. Then, when i change the status to Release I get this error message
    Settlement Rec. Obj. co. code is different. Pls use an object in the same co. code as this IO
    Message no. DB000
    This message clearly says to change the reciever to the same co. code. But, i was able to give a different internal order of anothe co. code and settle to it in SAP 4.6C
    Now, in ECC 6.0, it isnt allowing but at the same time, when the settlement reciever is a cost centre of a different co. code, it doesnt error.
    Can you please let me know ur thoughts on this.
    Thanks
    Ameet

    Hi,
    Can you tell me did you activate cross company settings in your client for settlement of one CO object from one company code to another.
    Best Regards,
    Ravi Reddy

Maybe you are looking for

  • Looping through SQL statements in shell script

    Hello members, I'm working on the Solaris environment and the DB i'm using is Oracle 10g. Skeleton of what I'm attempting; Write a ksh script to perform the following. I have no idea how to include my sql query within a shell script and loop through

  • Getting Error while Interfacing the Data in OM

    Hi Gurus, i am getting following error while i am running the interface in order management for interface the data into standard tables the error is as follows "This Customer's PO Number is referenced by another order" . This error is for the header

  • Organizational Unit is managed by Position

    i want to know which organizational Unit is managed by which position i.e. which is the chief position in particular Organizational unit. In which table i can get this relation ship.

  • Best lens/settings for outdoor shots (high contrast) with 6D?

    I have a 6D I'm just getting started with. When I get a perfect shot (perfect lighting, color saturation, depth of field, etc), I LOVE it! The trouble is, I'm not getting enough of them. Not capturing what my eye sees with good repeatablilty. I have

  • Performance costs of throwing an Exception

    Hi people. I was just reading another post around here, and I became curious about how much the Exception mechanism could become an overhead... I made a simple (REALLY simple) little test class, and I was shocked to perceive that actually throwing an