Change version of package. (Pacman, ImageMagick)

Is it possible to change or install particular version of package by using Pacman?
For example, I've got installed ImageMagick 6.7.4-0, but one app requires ImageMagick 6.7.3, and so I would like to change this version.
Last edited by lightgreenpanda (2012-01-09 01:16:16)

Trilby wrote:
Did you previously have 6.7.3 installed on your system and upgraded, or have you never had it?
Either way, the answer is "Yes" you can. But the "How" will depend on whether you previously had it or not.
Sadly, I can't know this fact (and I don't know how to check this out either).
Trilby wrote:Also either way, you should check out this wiki.
karol wrote:
There are things called dependencies, sometimes you have to downgrade several other packages because they depend on one another.
Also, if packages A needs package B in version 1.2 and up, while package C needs package B in version 1.1 tops - what do you do?
Thanks, now after reading this and wiki, I've realized that downgrading is not so good idea. Anyway, I can use my "problem-app" on VirtualBox so it's not such a big problem.
SS4 wrote:Imagemagick has been flagged out of date so perhaps holding out for an update may work? Also is it explicitly installed or does a certain package require said version for compiling?
Yes, it is installed already, there is shell output
identify -version
Version: ImageMagick 6.7.4-0 2011-12-13 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org

Similar Messages

Changing version of a package

How do I change the version of package without creating a new instance?
I have a package installed:
PKG = ABCDmypkg
VERSION = 2.3
I would like to change the package such that when the new version is pkgadd'ed, then its version number changes to 3.1 without doing a pkgrm.
The technique described in "Upgrading Packages" section of the Application Packaging Developer's Guide is not usable because, if I create a package with
PKG=ABCDmypkg
VERSION=3.1
then when I do pkgadd, it installs a second instance
named ABCDmypkg.2 which I don't want.
I want to change (upgrade) the package so that it
remains ABCDmypkg but the VERSION becomes 3.1
How do I do that?
Thank you.

You'll probably get best answer at one of the Solaris forums,
http://forum.sun.com/category.jspa?categoryID=2

How to delete an active change version of a PO?

Hi all mates,
question: given a PO number, assuming that the active version is a change one and the previous version has been ordered (I don't know if this is the proper word: I mean "transferred to the backend" (R/3))... is there a simple way, e.g, a FM, to delete the last version of a PO, so that this goes definitely lost and the previous version is restored and set to active?
As usual, thanks in advance
Matteo
EDIT:
after reading a bit, I'd like to add further details:
- what I call a "change version" is actually a new version of the purchase order which is in status "HELD";
- 'transferred to the backend' -> the current version of the purchase order is in status "ORDERED".
Then, if i click on the "version" tab in SRM, i can see that an order modified after distribution has a previous version (status "ORDERED") and a current version (in status "HELD").
I'd like to know if there's a way to delete the current active version and restore the previous, ORDERED version. The question arises because I'm creating a report that makes an update of a Purchase order, but to do so the order must be in status 'ORDERED' so if an HELD version is active I should "rollback" to the previous one... or alternatively, I must manage overwriting the HELD version currently active ( I wasted a lot of time but I wasn't able to do it ).
Edited by: Matteo Montalto on Apr 8, 2009 12:45 PM

Hi, I have the same problem. Can you tell me the solution that you have find ??

PDO Layer Error while approving a changed version of PO

Hi,
We are in SRM7.0 , EC Scenario , ECC 6.0
In SAP SRM system am experiencing a workflow issue , second level approver is not able to approve/receive the workitem of a changed PO. Moment we try to open the PO (changed version) and navigate to Approval tab, the approval flow is missing and showing the error as
PDO Layer Error
An Exception has occured
Every time we must restart the workflow due to which the approval needs to be done again from 1st approver.
We have raised an OSS Message and following is the response from SAP
" The second approver does not get an workitem because the workflow got the status error. The cause of this error is your BADI implementation
ZCL_SRMWF_AGENT_PO_BUYER method /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_AREA_TO_ITEM_MAP. This method returns an initial table LT_AREA_TO_ITEM_MAP.
Run method CREATE_DECISION_SETS (/SAPSRM/CL_WF_PROCESS_MGR_SBWF) with
parameter IV_PROCESS_GUID = xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "
When i executed this method CREATE_DECISION_SETS (/SAPSRM/CL_WF_PROCESS_MGR_SBWF) with
parameter IV_PROCESS_GUID = Changed version PO GUID , i got the following error
Exception CX_BO_ABORT triggered
Termination triggered in '' - Rollback required
Can anyone please help !!
Thanks & Regards,
Venkat

Hi ,
can you please share your Badi code?
Saravanan

Buffer Table Not Up To Date Short Dump When Publishing Change Version of Bid Invitation

Hi experts,
We are running SRM 5.5 with Support Level 16.
We have a bid invitation for which a user is trying to publish a Change Version. This bid contains two bid outlines, with one line item in each bid outline:
ITEM 1: HIER (Bid Outline)
ITEM 2: Line Item
ITEM 3: HIER (Bid Outline)
ITEM 4: Line Item
However, upon clicking on the Check or Publish button, the system throws a CX_BBP_PD_ABORT exception short dump. The reason for the exception given in ST22 is "Buffer table not up to date".
Due to organisational system security restrictions, I am unable to copy-paste the dump from ST22, so I will be typing out some of the details here.
Transaction: BBP_BID_INV
Program: SAPLBBP_PDH
Screen: SAPLBBP_BID_INV_1000
Termination occurred in the ABAP program "SAPLBBP_PDH" - in "BBP_PD_ABORT". The main program was "SAPLBBP_BID_INV".
In the source code you have the termination point in line 73.
Active Calls/Events
(formatted below as "No: Type: Name")
24: Function: BBP_PD_ABORT
23: Form: ABORT
22: Form: ITMADM_UPDATE
21: Form: ITMADM_MAINTAIN_SINGLE
20: Form: ITEM_F_CHECK_FROM_WTAB
19: Form: ITEMLIST_F_CHECK
18: Function: BBP_ITEMLIST_CHECK
17: Form: PROCDOC_DB_CHECK
16: Form: PROCDOC_CHECK
15: Function: BBP_PROCDOC_CHECK
14: Form: SSIS_DOCUMENT_CHECK_COMPLETE
13: Form: STATUS_SET_AND_INTERNAL_SAVE
12: Form: PROCDOC_UPDATE
11: Function: BBP_PROCDOC_UPDATE
10: Form: CHANGE_VERSION_UPDATES_ACTIVE
9: Function: BBP_PDCV_UPDATE_ACTIVE
8: Form: PROCDOC_CHECK
7: Function: BBP_PROCDOC_CHECK
6: Function: BBP_PD_BID_CHECK
5: Form: FCODE_DOCUMENT_CHECK
4: Form: FCODE
3: Function: BBP_BID_PROCESS
2: Form: PROCESS
1: Module (PAI): PROCESS
The ABORT subroutine is being called in Step 22 (ITMADM_UPDATE), at the following line:
* parent guids have to be identical ...
if gt_itmadm-parent <> w_itmadm-parent.
perform abort.
endif.
Upon tracing the variable values in the ST22 dump, it appears the program terminates when processing line 3 (i.e. the second Bid Outline). It appears that the first Bid Outline processes fine.
In the iteration for Line 3, the dump provides that gt_itmadm-parent contains the GUID to the Change Version document header, whereas w_itmadm-parent contains the GUID to the original Bid Invitation document header, resulting in a mismatch and subsequently program termination.
We have tried to replicate this bid invitation in our Development environment, but when executing, both gt_itmadm-parent and w_itmadm-parent contain GUIDs to the Change Version document header, hence the program does not abort.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Kwong How

Hi Janu,
For Note 1561750, I have looked at the Correction Details and observed that it makes changes to an IF-ELSE block, but will result in the same path of code execution as before. I.e., the Note changes the code from "IF a THEN b, ELSE c" to just "c", but according to my code trace, we are already executing the "ELSE c" block in its current state.
We will look further into Note 1877600. The unfortunate situation here is that since we are unable to replicate this issue in our Development/QA environment, and the Note description does not explicitly fit the situation we are facing, we need to be very sure that the Note can address the issue before bringing it into Production.
Otherwise, we will raise a message as suggested.
Thank you so much for your help!
Best regards,
Kwong How

Impact of the Transport Layer changes in the package

Dear Experts,
We are in the process of the Upgrade. As a part of the upgrade from 3.1to BI7. We have two Dev systems one is with the 3.1 - BWD and the other one is with the BI7- CBD now. We have transported all the objects with the Package : ZBWD (Where the transport Layer of this Package ZBWD).
And we have introduced the new Integration system(CBQ) in the landscape now and we have changed the Package ZBWD properties(We have changed the Transport Layer of this Package from ZBWD to ZCBD).
Can anyone please tell me the consequencies of this change in the package. We are planning to move this changed package, once the upgrade is finished.
Can any one tell me the consequencies of this change and also if we dont transport this package change in the other systems, then what wil be the consequences.?
Thanks
Raman
Edited by: Raman R on Aug 12, 2008 5:42 PM

Hi,
We have the package exists in the production which is with the earlier Transport layer called ZBWD.
As we have the new development system now, we need to change the Transport layer in that same package: to ZCBD.
Can anyone tell me will there be any impact of this change on the objects in the further landscapes? and also please explain me what are all the steps which needs to be carriedout if the transport layer got changed in the package?
Thanks
Raman.....

PO change version Approval/Rejection notification to requester

Dear SRM Gurus,
We are in stand alone scenarion of SRM 7.0 using process controlled WF.
We have received an request to send out notification on approval / rejection of and PO change version.
The PO's are created automaticaly from approved SC's and only the PO change triggers the approval WF.
I've already checked the IMG: SRM server > cross application > Event and event schema for alert management.
1. Define events: BUS2201 Purchase order is present with APPROVAL_PROCESS_DOC_APPROVED and APPROVAL_PROCESS_DOC_REJECTED
2. Define event schema for obj. type BUS2201 event schema PO the APPROVAL_PROCESS_DOC_APPROVED and APPROVAL_PROCESS_DOC_REJECTED with subcategory event APPROVAL_RESULT_NOTIFIC_NEW are set to event category NOTIFIC Message.
3. Define Recipient of notifications: PM Approve change version of purchase order - User Role CR contact person the options rejection and approval of application object are selected.
The users I'am using to test are the same as those who receive notifications for SC rejection/approval so I guess it's not connected to SU01 or PPOMA settings.
Still I don't see notification sent via SOST.
Any ides what I could check next please?
Thanks in advance for you help.
Michal

Hello Michal,
did you give the event schema created to corresponding transaction type ?
If you are expecting to receive notification during approval workflow, check OSS note [1395980 - No notifications of approval sent during approval process|https://websmp101.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=01100107900000000342&_EVENT=REDIR&_NNUM=1395980&_NLANG=E]
For PO, you can also check OSS note [1572957 - PO change version reject notification not sent|https://websmp101.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=01100107900000000342&_EVENT=REDIR&_NNUM=1572957&_NLANG=E]
Regards.
Laurent.

Output for changes versions in SRM

Hello,
We are currently trying to control when our SRM (server 550)system is to send output to our vendors, but the output is only to be sent if specific elements in an order is changed.
To do this we are using the table BBPD_COMP_FIELDS.
This works very well, there is just one problem that we cant seem to understand why.
If you created an order, then change the order with something that was not suppost to send output (because it is set in the table above) it sends the output. If you then change the same again it will not send out put (which is correct).
So what it does is for changes that shouldent send output when changed:
order --> output (correct)
change1 --> output (Wrong)
change2 --> no output (correct)
it should of been:
order --> output
change1 --> no output
change2 --> no output
Question is why and how do we get it to stop doing this?
Hope someone can help us.
Best Regards
Lisa M Simonsen

Hi
Use the PO version control BADi to change the version for the PO on identified field changes. In SPRO, out put conditions, trigger the change output when there is a change version of the document. This should work.
BBPD_COMP_FIELDS (with SM30). There is something mentioned about which fields to compare for PO output, you have to scroll some way down to get there.
Re: Changed PO output
Also, Please go through the following pointers, which might help you out.
Re: PO output fields
Re: Control PO output to vendor
Re: No Output Condition on Purchase Orders
Version Details
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Action not possible because change version exist

Dear All,
We are at SRM5.0- Extended Classic scenario and facing issues for changing some of the PO documents.
When the buyers are trying to change the PO, error is getting populated as 'Action not possible because change version exist'. This error is not allowing us to change the PO.
These POs are changed in the past and all the relevant changes are reflected to backend system with no issues. In other words Change Versions do exists for these POs. Flags for Change Version completion is also set and all historical versions can be seen but without change history.
Additional information -
1. No approval workflows are implemented for PO.
2. No locks are active for these documents.
Appreciate your help!
Regards,
Sagar

Hi Sagar and thanks for your response,
well, actually the active change version won't be preserved in any case. It would be overwritten in the first scenario, and deleted in the second one. The reason why I'd like to have this "brute force" method is to face an eventual human error. Suppose that a disalignment between R3 and SRM has been created; my report basically "alligns" the SRM version to the corresponding R3 one. And suppose also that the user made a mistake so that the program must be used a second time. I'd like to provide a way to "UNDO" the first execution of the program, that is to say: i'd like to provide a way to OVERWRITE the actual active, change version, or alternatively delete the change version that the report did create the first time it has been launched.
Hope it's a bit clearer now
Thanks for any hint/suggestion you can give me
EDIT: Oh, and please... can you provide me further information about your solution? I mean, use of that FM to unlock an active version of the PO and then the proper call to BBP_PD_PO_UPDATE specifying how you managed input params. Thanks a lot
Edited by: Matteo Montalto on Apr 9, 2009 11:43 AM

Changed version of Data Entry Profile imported results in empty worklist

Hi,
We've just moved, among other things, changed versions of all of the data entry profiles to our production server. Everything went well however all users get an empty worklist to start with.
Do you maybe know why this is? Is this standard behaviourd? And is/would there be any way to overcome this and do not have users start with a 'fresh' worklist?
Your help and input is very much appreciated.
Kind regards,
Tim

Hi,
The worklist is the one available in HR transaction CAT2. Source would be HR?
Kind regards,
Tim

Deploying standard changes to SSIS packages

A couple glitches were discovered in our SSIS template. Approximately 100 packages were built from the template. Is there a mechanism to update all packages with the changes? Or do I have to open each one and manually change?

I'm into the xml and notice a lot of difference between packages for DTS:DTSID I searched the net trying to find what DTS:DTSID is and if I should be replacing this text.
Hi Hawk73ku,
Each package object has a GUID, and the GUID is marked as the DTSID element in the XML code of the .dtsx file. Generally, it doesn’t matter to change the GUID of a package object only if the GUID is unique. However, when we try to modify certain XML code
snippet of a package, there is no need to modify the DTSID element actually.
You can first make the changes to a package, and compare and find out the modified code snippet. Then, you can open the code of any one package, and then perform text replace in the project or entire solution scope.
Regards,
Mike Yin
TechNet Community Support

PDO Layer Error in change version PO

Hi,
We are in SRM7.0 , EC Scenario
In SAP SRM system am experiencing a workflow issue , second level approver is not able to approve/receive the workitem of a changed PO. Moment 1st approver approve it and when requester try to open the PO (changed version) and navigate to Approval tab, the approval flow is missing and showing the error as
PDO Layer Error
An Exception has occured
Every time we must restart the workflow due to which the approval needs to be done again from 1st approver.
We have raised an OSS Message and following is the response from SAP
" The second approver does not get a workitem because the workflow got the status error. The cause of this error is your BADI implementation ZCL_SRMWF_AGENT_PO_BUYER method
/SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_AREA_TO_ITEM_MAP. This method returns an initial table LT_AREA_TO_ITEM_MAP.
Run method CREATE_DECISION_SETS (/SAPSRM/CL_WF_PROCESS_MGR_SBWF) with
parameter IV_PROCESS_GUID = change version guid xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "
When i executed this method CREATE_DECISION_SETS (/SAPSRM/CL_WF_PROCESS_MGR_SBWF) with
parameter IV_PROCESS_GUID = Changed version PO GUID , i got the following error
Exception CX_BO_ABORT triggered
Termination triggered in '' - Rollback required
Can anyone please help !!
Thanks & Regards,
Venkat

Hi Sarvanan,
I am a functional consultant and completely unaware of this technical stuff. Since this is SRM BRF workflows, none of our workflow consultants also are able to help me out on this issue. So, if possible could you please let me your contact number to so that i can contact you directly on this issue.
This is the issue which i am facing from last 7 months and none of the person is able to help me out. So, i kindly request you to please help me out on this issue.
As requested following is the code for the process level class
ZCL_SRMWF_PRC_CONF_BUYER_PO --> GET_BUYER_APPROVERS
METHOD get_buyer_approvers.
DATA : ls_header TYPE bbp_pds_po_header_d,
          lt_item TYPE TABLE OF bbp_pds_po_item_d,
          lw_item TYPE bbp_pds_po_item_d,
          lt_buyer TYPE TABLE OF zgtm_buyer,
          lw_buyer TYPE zgtm_buyer,
          lt_limit TYPE TABLE OF bbp_pds_limit,
          lw_approver_item TYPE zgswf_item_buyer_map,
          lv_requester_mgr    TYPE uname,
          lv_requester        TYPE uname,
          lv_appr_reqd        TYPE c.
CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL'
    EXPORTING
      i_guid   = iv_doc_guid
    IMPORTING
      e_header = ls_header
    TABLES
      e_item   = lt_item
      e_limit = lt_limit.
DELETE lt_item WHERE del_ind = 'X'.
DELETE lt_limit WHERE del_ind = 'X'.
CHECK lt_item IS NOT INITIAL.
SELECT * FROM zgtm_buyer
           INTO TABLE lt_buyer
           FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lt_item
           WHERE bukrs = ls_header-co_code
           AND matkl = lt_item-category_id.
LOOP AT lt_item INTO lw_item.
*CHECK IF APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
    CALL METHOD approval_level_required
      EXPORTING
        is_header   = ls_header
        is_item     = lw_item
        it_buyer    = lt_buyer
        it_limit    = lt_limit
      RECEIVING
        rv_reqd_ind = lv_appr_reqd.
    CHECK lv_appr_reqd IS NOT INITIAL.
*IF APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FIND THE BUYER
    READ TABLE lt_buyer INTO lw_buyer
                        WITH KEY bukrs = ls_header-co_code
                                 matkl = lw_item-category_id.
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
      lw_approver_item-owner = lw_buyer-bname.
    ELSE.
      CLEAR lw_approver_item-owner.
    ENDIF.
    lw_approver_item-itm_no = lw_item-number_int.
    lw_approver_item-co_code = ls_header-co_code.
    lw_approver_item-matkl = lw_item-category_id.
    lw_approver_item-itm_guid = lw_item-guid.
    APPEND lw_approver_item TO rt_approver_item.
    CLEAR lw_approver_item.
ENDLOOP.
ENDMETHOD.
KINDLY HELP ME OUT AND DO LET ME KNOW IF ANYTHING NEEDED FURTHER FROM MY END.
THANKS IN ADVANCE,
VENKAT

Change version not creates some times in GOA

Hello All
there is one piece of field in GOA will not create a change version.
as i know any piece of data changes will create a new versiona and workflow will get triggered.
i wanted to know which field changes will not create a Change version in GOA ?
any ppointers -->docuemnts ,, etc .
muthu

some times change version was not created and approval also not trigered .
From BBP_PD, do you see the new historical version at the bottom of the page? More importantly, was your change recorded in the document?
so i wanted to see what are the field changes in GOA will not create a change version.
should i look only CDI ?
I don't think CDHDR or CDITM would determine if or not the fields would create version. Versioning is very SRM specific.
i could not see any any docuemnts. for eg. if i attach any change version must create right?
I would think so - when you just add a new attachment, a new version should be created. However, that said, I still think the table BBPD_COMP_FIELDS is the place to define the triggering of new version.
versions created. but logs are captured but i donot see attachemnts,
Come again? What logs did you mean? Did you mean that you added an attachment but after you saved it (release the contract), the attachment disappeared?

[svn] 2932: Updated manifests with recent changes to TCAL package and class names.

Revision: 2932
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-08-20 14:01:37 -0700 (Wed, 20 Aug 2008)
Log Message:
Updated manifests with recent changes to TCAL package and class names.
Reviewer: Jason
Bugs: SDK-16531
QA: No
Doc: No
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16531
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/fxg-manifest.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/mxml-2009-manifest.xml

Revision: 2932
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-08-20 14:01:37 -0700 (Wed, 20 Aug 2008)
Log Message:
Updated manifests with recent changes to TCAL package and class names.
Reviewer: Jason
Bugs: SDK-16531
QA: No
Doc: No
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16531
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/fxg-manifest.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/mxml-2009-manifest.xml

Change versions for PO

Hi Experts,
Where can I see change versions for PO (purchase order) in ERP- MM?
Thanks

This Table will be updated only if you activate version management for PO .
if you want to see the changes made in PO there are 2 ways
1.Goto the PO (ME23n) ,menu bar Enivironment -- > item cahnges or header changes
2.Table level you can see in CDHDR and CDPOS tables .
first pass doc object - EINKBELEG and get document no from CDHDR
pass this doc no in CDPOS get the changes

Change version of package. (Pacman, ImageMagick)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for