Changes in conditions at header level in Scheduling Agreement

Dear experts,
I would like to change condition for duty at header level.when i did through ME32l,system is showing these conditions in Grey field.I want to over write the condition value with new one.
Please suggest me how to do this.
Thanks in advance
MK

Hi MK,
While condition customizing in "chnages can be made" manual entries if you select manual entry has priority "c" then only you can overwrite the condition value
but for selection "B" you will not be able to overwrite because this value is flowing auto from conition record
If you think logically if you are maintaining condition record and condition value is flowing auto why system should allow you to change instead you can change the condition record from where the value is flowing
And if you want that value to be always overwritten make "c" as priority
Hope this clears your doubt
BR
Diwakar
reward if useful

Similar Messages

BAPI_SALESORDER_SIMULATE How to get the conditions on header level?

Hi,
is it possible to get the pricing conditions on header level (sales order) with the Bapi BAPI_SALESORDER_SIMULATE?
We only found the information on item level?
Thanks a lot.

hope its possible,
If don't specify any item no for condition type in bapi, then it will be consider as header condition.
make sure condition should be header condition.
hope it will work.
Regards,
Marreddy

Deactivation of Pricing Conditions at header level of Sales Order

Hello there,
We have used a routine in pricing procedure (BaseType Routine) to deactivate condition MWST in the MWST condition line in pricing procedure, transaction V/08.
In the routine, We played with the KINAK (set to K )and KOBLI (set to space) flags of structure KOMT1 and XKOMV and delete the MWST entry in the TOBLI table and succeeded to deactivate the MWST at item level of the sales order. (MWST condition appear in the conditions tab at item level as inactive)
We have created a sales order with only one item that has the MWST condition deactivated at item level.
But in the conditions at header level the MWST condition does not appear. Shouldn't the MWST condition appear at header level but deactivated (with a yellow triangle next to MWST)?
If yes is there a flag that we forgot to set?

Hi,
what is the table name you had mentioned
TOBLI is it correct?
Thanks
mano

How to add Import PO condition types in PO and Scheduling Agreements

Dear Friends,
Pl tell me the procedure of adding Import PO condition types in PO and Scheduling agreement as these are not visible in the condition drop down list in ME21N and ME31L transaction. In pricing procedure theses conditions are available.
Conditions are as follows:
JCDB     IN Basic customs
JCV1     IN CVD
JECV     Ed.Cess on CVD
J1CV     H.Ed.Cess on CVD
JSDB     Ecess on BCD
JEDB     Sec Ecess on BCD
JADC     Addl.Customs Duty 4%
Regards,
ASK

Hi
1) please maintain tax code 0 on invoice tab
2) check condition record for these condition through mek1/mek2
3) check your defaulit condition in taxinn
spro-logistic general-tax on good movement-india -basic setting-determination of excise duty-maintain excise defult
Regards
Kailas

How to mantain entire freight charges in header condition or header level.

Dear - all
when am creating a purchase order i have 2line items with different materials. but i want to give freight charges as header level for which value will be distributed to each and every line item, so for that what will i do - which is my item condition and which is header condition.
But i want to enter the entire freight charges in header level or in header condition.
Pls suggest the procedure for mantaing the header condition for that i enter the total freight value in header level.
thanks
sunil

hi
u can do it by checking the tick of header condition in the respective condition
copy the condition FRA1-Freight % or FRB1-Freight (Value) in M/06
then
in changes which can be made coulumn u will get tick of header ,just tick it and add this condition to ur schema in M/08
hope it help

Change in partner at header level not getting copied to item level

Hello,
I would really appreciate any help from the forum on the below query.
How is it possible that a change in the Employee Responsible(Standard Partner Function) at the header level is not triggering a change in the item level?
Thanks,
Sahil

Hi Sahil,
Please look into below note.
It may hint you something.
1008458
Rgds
Hari

Condition at Header Level

Dear all,
Following is my requirement.
My condition (ZPPV)is at both header& item level (In M/06, header & item level condition check boxes are ticked).
My client requirement is if at header level, I enter condition amount say $ 50 & that perticular purchase order is having 7 line items, $50 should get equally divided to each line item i.e.( 50/7= $7.14).
Please tell me which setting should I do for it?
Best Regards,
Shailendra
Edited by: Shailendra Sabale on Jun 15, 2010 4:03 PM

Hi,
In M/06 you select the group condition indicator for your condition type.
Cheers,
Satish Purandare

Pricing procedure for contract conditions at header level and Item Level

Dear Friends
In Contract Sales Document Type [VOV8]in Contract section Pricing Procedure for Header and Item
What is the function of it
where we can mention list of Pricing Procedure here bec in standard only 3 pricing procedures is available
Kindly Regards
Arun

To have Milestone Billing Plan at header level also, you can maintain Billing Plan 01 in Sales order type (T.Code: VOV8) & for Item level Billing Plan has to be maintained at Item Category Level (T.Code: VOV7).
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward points if helpful.

Urgent: Change custom conditions on item level

Hi experts,
could you please tell me how you resolve this issue, its very urgent? I´m facing the promblem that my condition type doesn´t get changed! I want only to change KBETR at item level. After CRM_ORDER_SAVE is called I can see, that order got saved, but nothing happens
Please help me out! I think there is not a lot which has to be change. Here is my Coding:
parameters: lv_head type crmt_object_guid default '...'.
parameters: lv_item type crmt_object_guid default '...'.
parameters: lv_kbetr type prct_cond_rate default '12'.
insert lv_head into table lt_guid.
insert lv_item into table lt_item.
call function 'CRM_ORDER_READ'
   exporting
     it_header_guid                    = lt_guid
     it_item_guid                      = lt_item
   importing
     et_pridoc                         = lt_pridoc
     et_pricing_i                      = lt_pricing_i
* CHANGING
*   CV_LOG_HANDLE                     =
exceptions
    document_not_found                = 1
    error_occurred                    = 2
    document_locked                   = 3
    no_change_authority               = 4
    no_display_authority              = 5
    no_change_allowed                 = 6
    others                            = 7.
if sy-subrc <> 0 and lt_pridoc is not initial.
   write: / 'ERROR'.
   exit.
endif.
read table lt_pridoc index 1 into ls_pridoc.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
   write: / 'ERROR'.
   exit.
endif.
read table ls_pridoc-pric_cond into ls_cond with key kschl = 'Z002'.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
   write: / 'ERROR'.
   exit.
endif.
ls_input-ref_guid   = lv_item.
ls_input-ref_kind   = 'B'.
ls_input-objectname = 'PRIDOC'.
ls_input_fn-fieldname = 'WAERS'.
insert ls_input_fn into table ls_input-field_names.
ls_input_fn-fieldname = 'KBETR'.
insert ls_input_fn into table ls_input-field_names.
*ls_input_fn-fieldname = 'ACTIVATE'.
*insert ls_input_fn into table ls_input-field_names.
insert ls_input into table lt_input.
ls_pricom-ref_guid   = lv_head.
ls_pricom-ref_kind   = 'B'.
ls_pricom-pric_cond[] = ls_pridoc-pric_cond[].
move-corresponding ls_cond to ls_cond_chg.
ls_cond_chg-waers = 'EUR'.
ls_cond_chg-kbetr = lv_kbetr.
insert ls_cond_chg into table ls_pricom-cond_change.
append ls_pricom to lt_pricom.
call function 'CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN'
   exporting
     it_pridoc         = lt_pricom
   changing
    ct_orderadm_h     = lt_header
     ct_input_fields   = lt_input
   exceptions
     error_occurred    = 1
     document_locked   = 2
     no_change_allowed = 3
     no_authority      = 4
     others            = 5.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
   exit.
endif.
call function 'CRM_ORDER_SAVE'
   exporting
     it_objects_to_save   = lt_guid
   importing
     et_saved_objects     = lt_saved
*   ET_EXCEPTION         =
*   ET_OBJECTS_NOT_SAVED =
   exceptions
     document_not_saved   = 1
     others               = 2.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
   commit work and wait.
else.
   rollback work.
endif.
Best Regards
Tanja

Hi Tanja,
I am probably not the right person for code but please review below listed former threads which should be helpful:
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=661004
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=596313
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=186588
Best regards - Christophe

BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE - change the Payer at header level

Could someone look thru the following and tell me why i am getting an express message when i try to change the Payer.
The BAPI worked fine before I introduced the Payer change.
Any help appreciated........
-->when i changed teh item number to 000010 it says i am missing parameters but when i change it to 000000 i get the express document even though it says that the doc has changed <-
        LS_PARTNR     TYPE BAPIPARNR,
        LS_PARTRC   TYPE BAPIPARNRC,
        LT_PARTNR TYPE TABLE OF BAPIPARNR WITH HEADER LINE,
        LT_PARTRC   TYPE TABLE OF BAPIPARNRC WITH HEADER LINE,
LS_PARTNR-PARTN_ROLE = 'RG'.
LS_PARTNR-PARTN_NUMB = '1000000322'.
LS_PARTNR-ITM_NUMBER = '000000'.
APPEND LS_PARTNR TO LT_PARTNR.
CLEAR LS_PARTRC.
MOVE US_VBELN TO LS_PARTRC-DOCUMENT.
MOVE '000000' TO LS_PARTRC-ITM_NUMBER.
MOVE 'U' TO LS_PARTRC-UPDATEFLAG.
MOVE 'RG' TO LS_PARTRC-PARTN_ROLE.
MOVE '1000000570' TO LS_PARTRC-P_NUMB_OLD.
MOVE '1000000322' TO LS_PARTRC-P_NUMB_NEW.
APPEND LS_PARTRC TO LT_PARTRC.
CLEAR LS_PARTNR.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE'
    EXPORTING
      SALESDOCUMENT    = US_VBELN
      ORDER_HEADER_IN = LS_HEADER
      ORDER_HEADER_INX = LS_HEADERX
    TABLES
      RETURN           = LT_RETURN
      ORDER_ITEM_IN    = LT_ITEM
      ORDER_ITEM_INX   = LT_ITEMX
      PARTNERS         = LT_PARTNR
      PARTNERCHANGES   = LT_PARTRC.
Edited by: Ed Morrissey on Feb 1, 2008 3:05 PM

Thanks. I tried that but i can't delete the old payer and insert a new one. (cant do it in 'real time' either due to config0
But was an excellent suggestion.
I have spent more time on this and still have not found the answer although i have come across others on the web who have had the same problem.
Any other suggestions.......
Any body know why I may be receiving an express document when it tries to save the order ?.........

Conditions on RFQ Header are not changeable at PO Header level

Dear Gurus,
I have maintained a Quotation and enter the conditions on Header level in Quotation. Once i adopt the Quotation in Purchase Order, these conditions are displayed both at Item and Header level and i cannot edit the condition value at PO Header level, they are editable at Item level but not at header level.
I want to edit them at PO Header level too.
Please advise.
Johi Kapoor

Hi,
If that is item condition then you can not change it at header level
check in M/06 make it at header level in change which can be made tab
Regards
Kailas Ugale

PR00 cannot be changed on header level

Hi All,
I activated the "header condition" flag of the condition type "PR00". And the manual entries flag of PR00 is marked as "C" (Manual entry has priority) But when I created a sales order, the PR00 still cannot be changed. Anyboday knows about the reason? PR00 is now changeable on item level.
Thanks
Jerome

Hi,
I think you agree that that the PR00 condition at header level is a collection of all the line items.We are maintaining the condition record for the articles in the condition record.Which are at line item level.PR00 at header level includes the toatsl of all line items PR00.
In case if you want to give total net order value HM00 condition type
Thanks
M.Sridhar

Condition Currency at Header Level

Hi,
Using SRM 7.0, SP09, ECS.
We are unable to change the Conditions Curency for Header Level Conditions while creating RFx Response. Is it standard behaviour?
Note: It is working fine with item level conditions.
Ganapathi

Hi,
Someone who is using conditions in RFx/RFx Response kindl check and reply.
In RFx, before publishing add more than 1 currency in Bidder's tab page. In Response, go to condition tab page...
add a condition at item level for which calulation type is not %. You will get a box to select reqired currency....
add a condition at header level for which calculation type is not %. You don't get any option to selectu currency. The field is grayed out.....Is it so in your system?
Ganapathi

Pricing is not changed when pricing date is changed at header level.

Dear Gurus,
The query is about pricing. When I change the pricing date at header level it is supposed to chnage the pricing at item level also. But it is not happening. In our scenatio there is a ZPR0 price and there is a condition record for that.
The order was created earlier and now when we change the pricing date price is not being changed. I checked the analysis button. There it shows the following messages for ZPR0(In this case condition already exists). ZPR0 has three condition tables
1. Condition record exists, but has not been set (for the 1st table in acces sequence)
2. Access has not been executed due to previous access(for the 2nd table in acces sequence)
3. Access has not been executed due to previous access(for the 3rd table in acces sequence)
As a result we are not able to change price in the header level by changing the pricing date.
Please help
Thanks in advance,
Je

Hi Felipe,
The pricing will change if we click on the update button and select 'C' or 'B' option in the item level. But when we try to chnage by clicking on the update button in the header level it is not getting changed.
I would also like to add that customer wants the price to be changed without pressing the update button at tghe header level.
Please clarify on the pricing validity configuration . What steps are required in the pricing validity configuration.?
Thanking you,
Je
Edited by: jerryabap on Feb 4, 2011 12:17 PM

Pricing Conditions deactivation at header level of Sales Order

Hello there,
We have used a routine in pricing procedure (BaseType Routine) to deactivate condition MWST in the MWST condition line in pricing procedure, transaction V/08.
In the routine, We played with the KINAK (set to K )and KOBLI (set to space) flags of structure KOMT1 and XKOMV and delete the MWST entry in the TOBLI table and succeeded to deactivate the MWST at item level of the sales order. (MWST condition appear in the conditions tab at item level as inactive)
We have created a sales order with only one item that has the MWST condition deactivated at item level.
But in the conditions at header level the MWST condition does not appear. Shouldn't the MWST condition appear at header level but deactivated (with a yellow triangle next to MWST)?
If yes is there a flag that we forgot to set?

Hi experts,
Has anyone done the above mentioned before, please reply...

Changes in conditions at header level in Scheduling Agreement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for