Changes in TR from 4.7 to ECC 6.0

Hi All,
Our client have just upgraded from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 and when processing securities, according to them they didn't need to go through TBB1 before doing TPM10 back in 4.7. In summary this is their process:
4.7 (OLD) --> FWZZ (Create contract master data) --> TS01 (create transaction) --> TS04 (settle transaction) --> TPM10 (post transaction) --> TPM18 (fix amortization).
When they tried doing the above steps in ECC 6.0, they can not proceed with TPM10 because the system can not find the specific transactions.  I've researched about it and I've read in SAP HELP that you would have to do TBB1 first before doing TPM10. Is this a documented/recognized change for the Treasury module when upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 6.0? Is there any SAP note or document that could enumerate normal changes for the Treasury module and could explain the reason for such change? Please assist us on this as I am not so familiar with the Treasury processes. Thank you!

Hi,
Correct process flow is:
1. FTR_CREATE (TS01) -> Create securities transaction
2. FTR_EDIT (TS04) -> Settle transaction
3. TBB1 -> Post transaction to FI
In case, you need to reverse the above transaction which is already posting to FI, then follow the following steps:
4. FTR_EDIT (TS07) -> Reverse Settlement for the transaction
5. TPM10 -> Reverse accounting entries posted to FI in step 3.
5. FTR_EDIT (TS07) -> Reverse Contract completely.
Now if you accounting entries are incorrect in step 3 or 5 above, then you would need to look at account determination. You may just need to set your GL accounts right in the account determination.
Update type SE1000 posts purchase transactions. Check the posting specification assigned to it -> debit & credit account symbols within posting specification and -> the GL a/cs assigned to these symbols along with combination of valuation area & AAR.
Thanks and regards,
Abhinav Sethi

Similar Messages

  • SQ01 query layouts has been changed after upgrade from 4.6c to ECC

    Hi All,
    If any one come across the following situation please provide the solution as soon as posssible.
    When you execute the query the results are not displayed as fields are not copied under display column,not sorted,not filtered becos of this the query results are not displayed. Is there any solution are setting that need to be done so that the layouts fields are copied,sorted and filtered as they were before upgrade. I have checked all the query variants and they are imported correctly to ECC from 4.6c,there is problem only with the display.
    Is the query layout changes due to upgrade?
    Regards,
    JB

    Please Post the Note Number.
    late but Sure it will help others in future.

  • Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 - screen changes

    Does anyone have a document detailing the  HCM screen changes from 4.7 to ECC 6.0

    As mentioned, there are not many changes in screens - I guess you'll just have to wait and see.
    But this was never a problem during upgrade.
    Be ware of note 783499 and it's implications.
    You will have problems with IT0009 until this note was handled.
    One more thing.  Some of the infotypes no longer accept maintenance of text.  You need to turn this off in T582A, otherwise it looks like you can save text, but nothing is saved.  Whenever you hit T582A you will get an error message if the text maintenance is ticket off and not allowed.  But it is not turned off automatically during upgrade, so you have to check the infotypes.  I seem to remember IT0002, 0006,0021 are some of the infotypes no longer accepting text maintenance.
    Hope this helps
    Kirsten

  • Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0 - change text of infotype 0002 screen

    Hello Guru,
    My client is upgrading from 4.6C to ECC 6.0. In 4.6C the field RUFNM text in infotype screen for 0002 is "Know As"  where in ECC 6.0 is now "Nickname". The field is P0002-RUFNM? If I want to change the text in ECC 6.0 from 'Nickname' to "Know As". What is the best option? Modify the screen? or change the Data element? or any better way?
    Thanks

    Hi Bob,
    To change the Field Text, Data Element would be the better option.
    Good Luck
    Om

  • Upgrade from 4.6b to ECC 6.0 abap changes?

    Hi all,
    Kindly can any one provide me documentation on upgrading from 4.6 to ECC 6.0 Related to changes in abap code, obsolet functions, etc.
    It will be very helpful If you can help me.
    Thanking you in advance,

    ERP 6.0 has > 200.000 ABAP programs and function modules and other objects, having such "delta list" doesn´t make sense. Would you want to compare the programs one-by-one?
    Between 4.6B and ERP 6.0 are many years of development and many many uncountable changes.
    Please be a bit more specific what you want to check, then we may help.
    Markus

  • Delta changes taken place in PS functionality from 4.6C to ECC 6

    Dear All
    Can you tell me where we can get delta changes taken place in PS functionality from 4.6C to ECC 6 from?
    Is it readily available with SAP sites or do we need to find out manually?How?
    Regards
    SV

    Please refer this post.
    Difference between version SAP R/3 4.6C and SAP ERP 6.0
    Re: PS  between R/3 4.7 and ECC6.0.
    Regards
    Nitin P.

  • Changing documents downloaded from CRM into ECC, in ECC

    Hi
    Our requirement is to change documents downloaded from CRM into ECC, in ECC. I was refering to note 541113, but it is not of much use as we are using CRM 5.0. Also parameter that it says should be set I have set but ...obviously it didin't work. Please tell me what setting needs to be done for CRM 5.0 & ECC 6.0 so that our requirement is satisfied. I have searched SAP notes, without much success.
    Thanx in advance.
    Cheers
    Hits

    Hi,
    This is very simple.
    SAP has provided us with a new Scenario. this is called Scenario A.
    This scenario can be made Transaction Type specific.
    You need to maintain table  SMOFPARSFA in CRM and CRMPAROLTP in R3.
    SMOFPARSFA:
    Key = R3A_SALES
    ParamName = INT_CHANGE_ORDER
    ParamName2 = <Transaction Type>
    ParamValue = A
    CRMPAROLTP:
    ParameterName: CRM_SCENARIO
    ParameterName 2: INT_CHANGE_ORDER
    ParameterName 3: <sales document type>, for example TR
    ParameterValue 1: A
    Just do these settings and check. This must work
    Sharif

  • Any changes (SAP HR  upgradation from 4.7 to ECC 6.0)

    Hi
    could some one tell the major changes  while upgrading from SAP HR  4.7 to ECC 6.0, like
    1. changes in reporting
    2. data structures
    3. user exits
    4. infotypes.
    Many thanks
    Chinni

    I have questions experts:
    1. In case of upgrade / implementation of ECC6 what are the important consideration from testing point of view for all SAP HR Modules
    2. MSS and ESS is implemented for Performance Appraisal. One role and 3000 to 4000 users (Managers) and employee portion of Performance appraisals is in ITS as a URL service to the BSP page. This will be migrated to WebDynpro from ITS , could you please let us know what are the important functional parameters we should consider for the above activity
    I could not get apt information after searching the link
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    Please help me out in getting the solution

  • Transaction changes from 4.7 to ECC 6.0

    Hello,
    we are planning a release change from 4.7 to ECC 6.0.
    We need to know which transaction will be replaced or changed.
    We need to know this for planning test etc.
    Gruß
    Toni

    Hi Antonio,
    Please refer this wiiki link for
    Transactions Changed in ECC 6.0 - ERP Upgrade - SCN Wiki
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Upgrade changes from 4.7 to ECC 5.0 in HR

    Hi Experts,
        Can somebody give an idea on changes that took place while upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 5.0?
        1. What are the major uni-code changes that we have in ECC 5.0 compared to 4.7? I know the unicode check is present in 4.7 too (like WS_UPLOAD & WS_DOWNLOAD are obsolete) But are there any major unicode checks that we have to deal with while upgrading to 5.0?
       2. Are there any specific screen flow changes that we need to make a note for HR module?
      3. Any changes that can be found from using transactions SPDD and SPAU?
    Any reply would be really appreciated...
    Thanks in Advance,
    RVSS.

    >     Can somebody give an idea on changes that took place while upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 5.0?
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com
    http://service.sap.com/releasenotes
    >     1. What are the major uni-code changes that we have in ECC 5.0 compared to 4.7? I know the unicode check is present in 4.7 too (like WS_UPLOAD & WS_DOWNLOAD are obsolete) But are there any major unicode checks that we have to deal with while upgrading to 5.0?
    Upgrade and Unicode conversions are two different things.
    You may read
    Note 367676 - Release upgrade from 4.6 to 6.10 for customer programs
    Note 689951 - Release upgrade from 6.20 to 6.40 for customer programs
    >    2. Are there any specific screen flow changes that we need to make a note for HR module?
    check the corresponding release notes in
    http://service.sap.com/releasenotes
    >   3. Any changes that can be found from using transactions SPDD and SPAU?
    What do you  mean? Those transaction are for the technical modification adjustment.
    Markus

  • TCodes that have changed from 4.7 to ECC 6

    Hi,
    We are planning a upgrade from 4.7 to ECC6. Is there any readily available list of:
    1) Transaction Codes that have undergone a change from 4.7 to ECC 6?
    2) transactions that have become obsolete?
    Regards
    Peter

    Thanks Gautham for the prompt response.
    That means that I can only come to know of the changed TCodes after I upgrade and not before that? Or can I look at this table in any other company's ECC 6 system and get the data?
    Will company specific cutomisation have any bearing on the changes done by SAP to the std TCodes?
    Also does this table give the complete list of changed TCodes?  Also is there any table, FM etc which also gives what has been changed in these TCodes?
    Peter

  • Interview questions on upgrades from 4.7 to ECC

    Hi,
    Can any one please post some potential areas/questions that will be asked for upgrade projects from 4.7 to ECC6.0
    Points will be awarded.
    Thanks

    Hi Frank,
      this is good question,  why because sap upgrades from 4.6b to ecc 6.0 is very risky.
      take one example , in 4.5b , me21n application having 620 screen where as in ecc 6.0 having 9000 screen . that time we will take care of it.
       check the obsolete function modules ,  4.5b , having ws_upload, ws_download.... use cl_gui_frontend_services , under these having differnt type of methods.
      once you change the code in ecc , go to tranx : SLIN check the error where it is exact.

  • Error during Upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

    Hi All,
      We are facing an error when upgrading from 4.6c to ECC 6.0. We are facing this error on the table COEP - runtime object inconsistancy. What we found is there is ERP upgrade has created new extra fields in the table. In log file the error is specified as : Duplicate Field name, But we not able to find the duplicate field name in the table.  Please kindly help as early as possible. The upgrade process is stuck.
    Regards
    Anil Kumar K

    Hi Anil,
    Is this issue fixed? Can i know how you fixed it?
    replied to your message Re: How to adopt the index changes during upgrade.
    Thanks,
    Somar

  • Unicode error while upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 6.0

    Hello all,
    I am upgrading our SAP from 4.7 to ECC 6.0. while doing so we had folllowing error in the adjoinig statement of Search.
    Error : Table I_VBLS must have a character line type (data type C,N,D,T or string)
    Statement :
    W_TMP10 = I_VBLS-VBELN.
    SEARCH I_VBLS[] FOR W_TMP10 STARTING AT 1
    IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
       EXIT.
    ENDIF.
    Now I tried to remove this error by putting a loop on internal table I_VBLS and inside it concatenating the header line with a Field symbol and after that to a string variable. Then I used SEARCH statement for the same string. but unfortunately this is changing the functionality of the program by large extent. Does anybody know the exact code snippet to replace search Internal Table
    Edited by: Aalhad Deshpande on Feb 23, 2009 3:18 PM
    Edited by: Aalhad Deshpande on Feb 23, 2009 3:19 PM

    Hi,
    Try to use this method.
    CALL METHOD CL_ABAP_CONTAINER_UTILITIES=>FILL_CONTAINER_C
    E:G :-
            WRITE crlf TO i_linea-linea2.
    In this case also their are not mutually convertable. try to use this method and let me know
            CALL METHOD CL_ABAP_CONTAINER_UTILITIES=>FILL_CONTAINER_C
              EXPORTING
                IM_VALUE               = crlf
              IMPORTING
                EX_CONTAINER           = i_linea-linea2
              EXCEPTIONS
                ILLEGAL_PARAMETER_TYPE = 1
                others                 = 2.
    Regards,
    Sathish

  • Asset query execution performance after upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0+EHP4

    Hi,guys
    I am encounted a weird problems about asset query execution performance after upgrade to ECC 6.0.
    Our client had migrated sap system from 4.6c to ECC 6.0. We test all transaction code and related stand report and query.
    Everything is working normally except this asset depreciation query report. It is created based on ANLP, ANLZ, ANLA, ANLB, ANLC table; there is also some ABAP code for additional field.
    This report execution costed about 6 minutes in 4.6C system; however it will take 25 minutes in ECC 6.0 with same selection parameter.
    At first, I am trying to find some difference in table index ,structure between 4.6c and ECC 6.0,but there is no difference about it.
    i am wondering why the other query reports is running normally but only this report running with too long time execution dump messages even though we do not make any changes for it.
    your reply is very appreciated
    Regards
    Brian

    Thanks for your replies.
    I check these notes, unfortunately it is different our situation.
    Our situation is all standard asset report and query (sq01) is running normally except this query report.
    I executed se30 for this query (SQ01) at both 4.6C and ECC 6.0.
    I find there is some difference in select sequence logic even though same query without any changes.
    I list there for your reference.
    4.6C
    AQA0FI==========S2============
    Open Cursor ANLP                                    38,702  39,329,356  = 39,329,356      34.6     AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     Opens
    Fetch ANLP                                         292,177  30,378,351  = 30,378,351      26.7    26.7  AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
    Select Single ANLC                                  15,012  19,965,172  = 19,965,172      17.5    17.5  AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
    Select Single ANLA                                  13,721  11,754,305  = 11,754,305      10.3    10.3  AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
    Select Single ANLZ                                   3,753   3,259,308  =  3,259,308       2.9     2.9  AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
    Select Single ANLB                                   3,753   3,069,119  =  3,069,119       2.7     2.7  AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
    ECC 6.0
    Perform FUNKTION_AUSFUEHREN     2     358,620,931          355
    Perform COMMAND_QSUB     1     358,620,062          68
    Call Func. RSAQ_SUBMIT_QUERY_REPORT     1     358,569,656          88
    Program AQIWFI==========S2============     2     358,558,488          1,350
    Select Single ANLA     160,306     75,576,052     =     75,576,052
    Open Cursor ANLP     71,136     42,096,314     =     42,096,314
    Select Single ANLC     71,134     38,799,393     =     38,799,393
    Select Single ANLB     61,888     26,007,721     =     26,007,721
    Select Single ANLZ     61,888     24,072,111     =     24,072,111
    Fetch ANLP     234,524     13,510,646     =     13,510,646
    Close Cursor ANLP     71,136     2,017,654     =     2,017,654
    We can see first open cursor ANLP ,fetch ANLP then select ANLC,ANLA,ANLZ,ANLB at 4.C.
    But it changed to first select ANLA,and open cursor ANLP,then select  ANLC,ANLB,ANLZ,at last fetch ANLP.
    Probably,it is the real reason why it is running long time in ECC 6.0.
    Is there any changes for query selcection logic(table join function) in ECC 6.0.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Looking up a EJB 3.0 Session Bean in JSP Scriptlet

    Hello There, Somebody please enlighten me. I have a bean named a.b.MyBeanextending local interface a.b.MyLocalNow I want to use this bean in a JSP (Maybe just for fun, but the point is I am not using resource injection). So the question is, What is t

  • Need to fill a new field in table EKKO

    Hi all, i created a new field (ZZCODE) in the table EKKO. Well, now i would like to fill this field when the user save his purchase order. Which user-exit or BADI can i use ? I tried a lot but either i can't change the parameters values either the FM

  • Need help doing a reverse of a file on a different server

    Hi - I'm trying to a reverse on a file that is on a different machine than my personal pc. My steps: 1) created physical arch and test was successful to server. 2) log arch and context defined 3) in designer, created a model (as file). Two questions:

  • Should you get a separate iCloud account for each family member if you are sharing calendars and contacts?

    My husband got his first iPhone. We are now an Apple Family. We share contacts and calendar with our phones and computers. Is one iCloud account ok or should he get his own account? If he gets his own account, would it conflict with mine?

  • What is the functional scope of the report MILL_IBASE?

    Hello, We're working for a cable manufacturing company and we came across a possible problem. We've discovered recently some double classifications in our system. Could we use this report MILL_IBASE to retrieve all double classifications found in our