Changing account assignment at invoice receipt (MIRO/MIR7)

Hello gurus,
I have got two questions concerning changing the account assignment of a PO item at invoice receipt.
Example: We have a PO item with account assignment category K and non-valuated goods receipt. Now, after GR, we receive the invoice and want to post it using MIRO.
During this process we notice that the correct account assignment category would have been A. In MIRO we can change all accounting information (apart from the account assignment category). So we delete the assigned G/L account and cost center and enter the correct asset master number in the asset column. Then we post the invoice.
Result is that the invoice is posted to the asset, the vendor and the tax account. So, everything seems to be ok, except that the account assignment category in the invoice document is still K.
Now, my questions:
1. Is it allowed to change the accounting information as described, even if that means that the account assignment category is u201Cwrongu201D afterwards? I.e. is this a standard process?
2. This works fine using MIRO, but when we try it to use MIR7, when posting the invoice there is a cryptic workflow error message (Message no. 00398) stating something like u201CPlaceholder for batch input error text, this message is not output. Please notify system administration u2013 Problem with S.u201C [sic!]
Any ideas on this?
Thanks in advance
Alicia

Hi Praveen,
no, there is no error in MIR7. But the invoice is not posted and the workflow shows the error message given in my original posting.
And the point is that I cannot change the K to A in MIRO or MIR7, but I can change G/L account, cost center, asset etc. So after I change it, I still have account assignment category K, but no G/L account and cost center given. Instead, there is only the asset number.
This looks a bit funny to me and I wondered, if this could lead to any problems, because something like that would not be allowed in the PO.
Cheers
Alicia

Similar Messages

  • Multiple account assignment in invoicing plan

    We are using Invoicing plan and activated multiple account assignment in the "account assignment category config". in ECC 6.0
    Following are the scenarios and issues.
    1. An invoice is posted through MRIS (Invoicing Plan Settlement) with one account assignment only.--- the systems posts the invoices correctly.
    2. Change account assignment to multiple lines .e.g. two GL accounts with 60% and 40% -- Upon running MRIS, The system posts invoices 80% and 20%.
    3. Continue next period with MRIS, and the system posts correctly i.e 60% and 40% as per PO .
    4. If the account assignment is not changed there after, the system posts correctly.
    We  found in the debug mode the system calculates the split by way of taking into account the values in the PO history, and the previous items in the invoicing plan.
    Is there any way we can achive the desired split account after the first invoice is posted with single account assignmetn?
    p.s. If we split the account assignment prior to the first invoice is posted, there is no issue.

    B.K.
    I need the user exit in the SES no in the PO.
    Thanks,
    CD

  • Unloading point is not copied from PR -PO,when i change account assignment

    Hi All,
    unloading point is not copied from PR -PO,when i change account assignment from 'K' to 'F' in PO. unloading point field should be in display for both 'K' & 'F' Account assignment category in SPRO because we r using this field to acknowledge my thirty party planning system.
    Thanks in advance
    Vengal Rao

    Have a look at SAP note <a href="https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/734273">734273</a>

  • Multiple Account Assignment At Invoicing

    Dear Guru's
    Is it possible to use a purchase order without account assignment at invoicing and assigning multiple accounts at that point.

    it wont be possible to do it at invoice stage. coz in multiple account assignment scenario, GR will be non valauated, and unless you specify an account assignment in PO, you cannot valulate it for mutiple acount assignments at IV.

  • Changes in Purchasing Document Account Assignment during Goods Receipt

    Hi MM Gurus,
    Good day!
    I just wanted to check with you on something that I came up while tinkering with SAP. Say, I have a PO with account assignment F for Order 1. Then during GR, I realized that I placed the wrong account assignment object, which should be Order 2. Can I execute this change during GR or do I have to do it either at the PO or IV level? In the standard MIGO setup, the Account Assignment tab is set to display. I tried checking the details for F in OME9 and found the Account Assignment changeable field. I tried enabling it but I still came up with the same result. I understand the logic behind why is it setup that way, but I want to make sure if there is any workaround for this
    Hope you can respond the soonest.
    Regards,

    I our company (and many others I had contact to) the goods receipt is made by the porter or the warehouse people, in general from people different from the requestor. I mean the receipt is done at the central place where the goods arrive at the plant.
    the internal distribution is made based on the GR slip which has all necessary information.
    A warehouse guy, or even a porter (often from a external security service  provider) should not be able to correct any financially relevant information.
    A change of account assignment data may even be a conflict to existing approval strategies.
    LIV is done by accountants, a totally different skill level compared with warehouse workers.

  • Unable to change account assignment field in PO

    Hi Experts!
    We are using SRM 7.0 with extended classic scenario.
    We are facing an issue with account assignment category field in a PO.Here is our scenario.
    User created a PO with costcenter account assignment field and this PO transffered to backend system i.e R/3.
    When the user again tried to edit the PO in SRM and change the account assignment field from costcenter to Internal order that is not possible because the
    account assignment field is grayed out .Then the user has to create a new PO with Internal order as the old PO didn't allowed him to change.
    Can any one help me in this regard with  some OSS note or any other possible solution and what might be the reason for the same?
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards,
    Kalyani.

    Hello Kalyani,
    Just to understand, Is your PO has Good Receipt or Invoice receipt processed? If so then PO do not allow to change the account assignment as charges are booked already.
    If not i would recommend to check if your BBP_GETSTATUS_2 job is running with proper interval? Sometime old PO's do not get refresh status if BBP_GETSTATUS_2 variant is set based on SAP recommendation (i.e. 7 days or so). In that case please execute manually BBP_GETSTATUS_2 and validate.
    Thank you
    Ritesh

  • Change account assignment category for services with ME22N

    Dear guru ,
    i have created a purchase order for a position with item category D(service) and account assignment category K(cost centre). I have inserted for the accounting view the cost center.
    After the saving If I a try to change the purchase order position with ME22N the system donu2019t allow to change the account assignment category (F order instead of K).
    I have verified that for other positions with account assignment category K(cost centre) but for Item category blank(standard) the system allow to change the account assignment category if not exist goods receipt or invoice.
    Whatu2019s the problem about services ?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Usually the Account assigned PO's are fixed with Account assignment, you cann't modify the account assignment once it is saved.
    It depends on the IMG settings for Account assignment category.
    Check the following IMG Settings
    SPROMMPurchasingAccount assignment-Maintain account assignment categories
    Here check for "K" --Costcentre in the detailed information if the checkbox at Acct assignment changable then only you can modify the Account assignment category modification in PO, otherwise not possible.
    rgds
    gsc

  • Userexit for Payment block invoice in MIRO/MIR7/Mrrl

    Hi All,
    In an purchase order invoice the the Payment block is defined at coompany code. My requirement is to define it at more granular level like at level of item category. For certain item categories I have to avoid the tolerance date check of paymeny block from getting triggered. Is there any userexit which allows to define the tolerance check for line items at item category level.  (MIRO/MIR7/MRRL transactions)
    Case here is: The delivery date entered in PO is dated as 3 months later. Entry  sheet generated also shows the date as 3 months later. But the invoices are generated on monthly basis. So those invoices for which the delivery date of PO &entry sheet is not reached, automatically goes to Live Payment Block. The payment block  on invoice has to be manually released.
    Is there any other way to stop invoice from going to payment block.
    I did changes in exit EXIT_SAPLMR1M_001 which has item category field. But this exit is not triggering always. On few cases it triggers.
    I would appreciate any help on this. Thanks.

    hi,
    do use imlicit enhancement in the function module
    MRM_FINAL_CHECK in this the line item details will be populated t_drseg table...........

  • Filling alloction field for a subledger account by posting invoice by MIRO

    Hi, at this moment I am struggling with a problem concerning filling the field Allocation at line item of an GL account. When I am posting invoice by MIRO, I want to see certain information on line item of an GL Account. When I am posting an invoice by MIRO, this field is for P&L accounts and balancesheet accounts filled with the value such a determined in FS00, tab Control data, field Sort Key. So therefore all my accounts has the sort key Purchase order. When posting invoices by MIRO, the posting in FI, is showing me on line item level the PO-number in the field Allocation.
    However, when I am posting an invoce by MIRO on an reconcilliation account for asset, the allocation field is empty, MIRO is not filling this field automatically. Although the settings of the sort key is the same as for other balance or P&L accounts.
    Has anybody an idea how the allocation field can be filled automatically for an reconcilliation account for assets

    Hi
    Run the program RM07CUFA
    in SE38 Tcode and check the inconsistencies.
    Also in FS00 go to details of the GL account and double click on field status group under create bank interest tab and then double click material management/additional assignments.
    You can see the required or suppressed fields

  • Change account assignment for posting key-urgent

    Dear expert,
    please advice, when running mb30, in accounting doc for material xxx we want to change account for posting key 91 with other account since the old one is blocked.How to change this account assignment then?
    Thank you

    Hi
    I am not sure whether MB30 Tcode exist. anyways, if you are sure of the Movement type with which your document is getting posted, then you can get the details of the Transaction in the OMWN. In OMWN please select the Movement type and you will see all the Tr Keys.
    Or you can get into OMWB and select Simulation. Give the material, plant and movemnet type and then select the account assignments you will have all the information.
    Regards
    Nambi

  • Changing Account assignment reference after posting flows to accounting

    Hi All,
    Is there a way for me to change the account assignment reference after I posted some flows in the past for a interest rate financial instrument? 
    I need this because accounting wants to change the GL account posting for legal fees from one GL to another when a long term debt changes to a short term debt (less than a year away from maturity).  I was assuming that changing the account assignment reference in TPM28 would work.  Is this true?  I do not want to transfer any of the old postings but anything moving forward.
    Thanks
    Regards
    Morgan

    Hi Ravi/Mahesh/Lorenz
    The issue is I can do valuation class transfer for securities or loans (TPM15).  But I have my long term debt in the money market area (Interest rate instrument with product category 550).  I have assigned company code, transaction type, product type to determine the account assignment reference.  So I am not able to do a valuation class transfer I think.  Is there any other way?
    I tried to access TPM82 & TPM15M & it says 'Function not allowed'. We are on Ehp5.0.
    Am I missing something?
    Thanks
    Regards
    Morgan

  • Change account assignment and G/L account field

    Dear Experts,
    user creating purchase requisition with wrong account assignment and G/L account ,user requirement to change the account assignment and G/L account in the change mode,but system not allowing,user creation the line item again,so its consuming more time so please suggest me.
    Thanks in advance.
    Varun

    Hi,
    System has been designed for your business, so you have separate document type for account assigned PO where document type of PO link to Field Selection Key where you have control on  how the screen ,filed has to be appear in PO.
    Once PO has been created wrongly and to correct it, you need to follow my 1st answer , no need to go for any enhancement and if you do so by any mean, business will not allow you do so.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Invoice Receipt (MIRO) -amount authorization problem

    I have made an Inter Company stock transport order. Now After outbout delivery , PGI , and GR when I am trying to create invoice receipt I am having the following problem-
    "No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code INDR
    Message no. F5155
    Diagnosis
    No amount authorization for customer/vendor line items has been specified in company code INDR for the user group to which you are assigned.
    Provided that you are not explicitly assigned to a user group, the amount authorization to the group blank (" ") is valid.
    Procedure
    If you entered the correct company code, initiate the maintenance of tables T043 (user groups) and/or T043T (company code authorizations). "
    Plesae suggest what to do now ?
    Thanks in advance .
    Regards,
    Anupam

    Hi
    Check below settings in IMG:
    Materials management - Logistics invoice verification - Authorization Management - Define Tolerance Groups & Assign User Tolerance Group. I hope you dont have authorization to post the invoice with XXX amount because of tolerance limits.
    Thanks

  • Pop-up after saving invoice in MIRO/MIR7 does not appear during replay

    Hello All,
    I have a problem with the execution of the eCATT Script for Transaction MIRO and MIR7. After the document is saved/posted in MIRO we get a pop-up with the FI document number and a few other information. While recording, i am able to get this pop-up. But while i replay, the script stops in the step where i press save and the document number is displayed in the status bar.
    Normally this would not be a problem as i will be able to check for the document number from the corresponding table. But in one scenario where i have to park an incoming invoice using MIR7, i need to specify the department at the end. This step occurs as a pop-up after i press save similar to the pop-up with the document numbers. Now, if i do not specify the department, subsequent steps in my process will fail. I am unable to find an alternative for this.
    Has anyone faced this issue while replaying MIR7/MIRO? Please help,
    Regards,
    Sidhaarth
    Edited by: Sidhaarth V N Mohana on Nov 21, 2011 2:18 PM

    > i am not able to capture the asset number that got generated >after doing the call transaction.MESSTAB returns no value
    are you sure..? did you check the messagetab check all the message variable once again
    MSGV1
    MSGV2
    MSGV3
    MSGV4

  • ME51N change account assignement in limit for services (4.6C)

    Hello ,
    it seems that in  a purchasing requisition for services (postype = P) if the user changes
    the material group at item(line level) the system does not determine again the right account
    ESKN-SAKTO derived from T030, so the user should change it manually.
    Is it possible to make a replacement with the right account direct from abap,
    (for example using EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_005/06) or there is a better solution with BADI  or else ?
    In EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_005/06 we was only able to generate a warning message.
    Regards,
    Riccardo.

    Hi,
    Please check this code..It worked for me..Instead of 00001 try giving 00010
    PARAMETERS: p_ebeln TYPE ebeln OBLIGATORY.
    PARAMETERS: p_text(50) OBLIGATORY.
    PARAMETERS: p_textid TYPE bapimepotext-text_id OBLIGATORY.
    DATA:
            lt_poitem         LIKE bapimepoitem OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
            lt_poitemx        LIKE bapimepoitemx OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
            lt_return         LIKE bapiret2      OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
            lt_bapi_itemtext  LIKE bapimepotext OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
    <b>lt_poitem-po_item = '00010'.</b>
    APPEND lt_poitem.
    <b>lt_poitem-po_item = '00010'.</b>
    APPEND lt_poitem.
    lt_bapi_itemtext-po_number = p_ebeln.
    <b>lt_bapi_itemtext-po_item   = '00010'.</b>
    lt_bapi_itemtext-text_id   = p_textid.
    lt_bapi_itemtext-text_line = p_text.
    APPEND lt_bapi_itemtext.
    call the BAPI.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_CHANGE'
         EXPORTING
              purchaseorder = p_ebeln
         TABLES
              return        = lt_return
              poitem        = lt_poitem
              poitemx       = lt_poitemx
              potextitem    = lt_bapi_itemtext.
    LOOP AT lt_return WHERE type = 'A' OR type  = 'E'.
      EXIT.
    ENDLOOP.
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
      WRITE: / 'Error'.
    ELSE.
      COMMIT WORK.
      WRITE: / 'Success'.
    ENDIF.
    Thanks,
    Naren

Maybe you are looking for