Chaning Order type for Internal order

Hi ,
We have created a wrong order type for IO and we wants it to get changed.
I understand that Order type is something that cannot be changed.
Let me know whether the below steps are correct -
1. Close the existing wrong order by setting the deletion indicator
2. Create a new order with the correct order type
IF there are any others ways that could be followed, it will be great if you could provide such info.
Also, let me know if any thing else to be taken care in this situation.
Regards,
Sridevi

Hi,
The steps you have told are correct. Go ahead and do it, if case of any issue, come back. Just ensure that you have no actuals bookes, if they are you need to reverse them.
Regards

Similar Messages

Order type for planned order in repetitive manufacturing

hi
In repetitive manufaturing there is no prodcutiion order
planned order only. so i want know what is order type for repetitive manufacturing
In configuration order type for reptitive is required or not if yes then how will define order type ,where
In Discrete order type will define to control prodution order
like that i want know details about order type in repetive manufature
ravikumar

HI
Planned order in REM is of PE type thar s non convertible in PO and also these planned orders are assigned to PVs thru Planning table and the Confirmation is done agianst these planned orders.
check these links:
Re: order type in repetitive manufacturing
http://www.sapfunctional.com/PP/REM/page1.htm
Regards
Anupam Sharma

Assigning Filter Object Type for Internal Order

Hi All,
I have a requirement to send a INTERNAL_ORDER IDOC to another system on creation or on change of an order. I have created the model view and added the BAPI InternalOrder.SaveReplica in the distribution model (BD64) and the next step was for me to add a filter. I tried creating a filter group but then I get the message "Select node:Content-dependent parameter filtering". I have done a similar configuration for PROJECT idoc before and I was able to solve this by configuring in BD95 - Defining the filter object type and then BD81 - Assigning the filter object type to the parameter. However now when I try and implement the same steps for the Internal Order IDOC, I am having trouble assigning a filter object type to a parameter. I want to filter by company code and so far I was able to define the filter object type (BUKRS) in BD95 and then when I go on to try and assign this to the BAPI Parameter in BD81 , only 1 parameter appears (objectstatus) when I drop down for the parameter options.
The row entry that I am trying to add is:
Obj. Type
Method
Filter object type
Parameter
Field Name
BUS2075
SAVEREPLICA
BUKRS
MASTERDATA
COMP_CODE
But only OBJECTSTATUS appears in the Parameter block as an option when I press F4.
Further more when I try save the entry as above, I get an error. Error Message: "Entry MASTERDATA does not exist in (check entry)"
Can I please get some guidance on how to filter the internal order by company code or more importantly advise on which step I may have skipped in order have “MASTERDATA” appear as an option for Parameter field in BD81.
Thank you.

Hi,
I need to pass object key or object type to a function module 'SAP_WAPI_WORKITEMS_TO_OBJECT'. This function module returns the worklist details(workflow inbox). In worklist details i need to use the field for workitem id.
Regards,
Gautham

Reg : Order type for Planned order

Hi ,
After MRP when i checked planned ordre created in the order type it is showing " VP " instead of " LA " ordertype
My pegged requirement is PIR where i need to check for this . My planning strategy group is " 52 " Planning without
Final assembly without MTO. More over i am not getting any PR for component parts
Please suggest me where I need to check for this .
Regards,
jaya Vimal

Hi Prasobh ,
I am happy to see you again in SDN forum after long ,
Yes you are correct the requirements are not convertible on receiving STO in Planning Plant only it will consume PIR
and I am using Strategy group 52 with requirement type is VSE.
In this how can I test for a complete production cycle I am unable to convert planned order manually in to Production Order.
to complete testing . Why system showing PIR order type VP instaed of LA order type. Marks will be awarded further more for
further answer. Further marks will be awarded for further Answer. I checked there is no component for this planned order is
only for FERT and Halb part .
Regards,
Jaya Vimal
Edited by: jaya vimal on Jun 11, 2010 11:15 AM

Change the default service order type for repair order - RA

When creating a repair order (RA), a service order of type SM03 is triggered. The default order type is SM03. How can I change the order type?
Thanks in advance...

hi,
try to change in OIOL and check ..
regards
pushpa

Best Practice - Order Types for Consumers

I was curious what the best practice is for entering orders within the CRM Interaction Center. Do you have a separate order type within the CRM system and pass it to the SAP system for "Consumer" orders and then have a different order type that is defined in the ECC system for distributor/wholesale orders?
We are trying to determine if it is best practice to have a separate order type for consumer orders or not.
Any help on this topic would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Darcie

Hello Darcie,
I received the following guidance from one of our CRM consulting practice managers at SAP:
"My recommendation to customers is that they separate out the number ranges and order types. Especially if they are being created via different sales channels. The reason is two-fold:
1. Gives greater visibility to what is created in one channel vs another channel (easy to report by order/document type and visually, someone would see an order that starts with 7 and know that itu2019s for consumers whereas one that starts with a 4 would be for wholesale accounts).
2. Even if the order/document types behave the exact same way today, they may want the flexibility to be able to change how a consumer order behaves without affecting the wholesale orders. They could always add the new order type later, of course, but itu2019s easier to set that structure in place now."
Regards,
John

Settings for order type in planned orders

Dear All,
Where can i customise the order types for planned order.?
My scenario is.. i can not send complete product in vehicle , which has to be dismantle and send in different vehicle, so the different invoices are required. i can dismantle the product and add these assemblies as line item and invoice. in this case i will loose the main product code which i dont want. i wanted this to behave similar to phantom item , where i can see the phantom item and plan only components.
Please throw sme lite on this...
Thanks
Raghu

Hi
You can customize the planned order profiles in
SPRO--- Production MRP- Procurement proposals -
Planned orders--- Define order profile.
Thanks
S.Murali

Settlement Rule for Internal Order

Hi All
I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
CAT - FXA
Settlement Receiver - Asset
% - 100
Settlement type - Full
Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
Message no. KD042
Diagnosis
You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

Hi:
        Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
"Symptom
    1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
    2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
Additional key words
KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
Cause and prerequisites
    1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
    You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
    The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
    2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
Solution
    1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
    2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
    Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
Regards

ATP for Internal orders

Hi All,
I'm a new Oracle user asking for your help. We are using the ATP for make-to-order items only in order to assign to the sales orders a scheduled ship date that consider the manufacturing LT set up in the "Cumulative Manufacturing" field in the org item. We receive two different types of orders- Sales orders and Internal Orders. It looks like the ATP works for the sales orders only. Could you advise if it is possible to set it up for internal orders as well?
Many thanks

Hi
Thanks, but the internal sales orders will be sent to APO with a new Z ATP category. We want to know if this new Z ATP category can be used for example in the BOP also for back order processing.
Also if there are inconsistencies, can inconsistent sales orders with the Z ATP category also be recognized in the Delta report, or do we need to make enhancements?
I could not find a clear note which describes if you create a new ATP catagory for sales orders in APO which standard APO eports will work seamlessly with the new ATP categoy. And if the below reports should be enhanced (user exits, BADI etc) to make sure sales orders assigned to a custom ATP category will also be included in the comparisson between APO and R/3.
Backorder processing: /SAPAPO/BOP
Deltareport: /SAPAPO/CIF_DELTAREPORT3
Correction report: /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21

Error message when doing settlement for Internal order

Hi,
Can someone please help me to resolve the following error:
When trying to run settlement for an internal order, following error message is generated:
Item 001 Order xxxxx budget exceeded
Message no. BP603
Diagnosis
Budget was exceeded by xxxx amount in document item 001 Order xxxxxx.
Also following points may be relevant:
- System status ISBD for Internal Order is active
- There is no PR/PO for the order, direct invoice from FI is created through tcode FB50
- Availability control: Activation Type 1, Overall field ticked in customization
- Tolerance Limits: Availability control action .... Usage 85 % - Warning message, Usage 100 % - Error message
Thanks,
Ankita

Hi Loong,
Thanks for reply.
I have already tried drilling down the report S_ALR_87013019 , however following are the only things available from the report.
1. There is a year independent overall budget for the order of 92500 amt.
2. Actual in 2009 is 7870.41 and in 2010 is 77980.24. So the total actual amt is 85850.65 overall.
3. The available budget is 6649.35. i.e Over budget minus actual utililized amounts.
Since, in the report it shows that the budget is available then I am unable to figure out why does it give error for exceeding budget by amt 50100.65 at the time of settlement.
Regards,
Ankita

Transaction group for internal order

Hi Experts,
Please tell me where is the assignment done of transaction groups for internal order status management (KOV2) to internal order types. And how to add additional business transaction in it.
Regrds,
Sonali.

Hi,
In the order master, you can enter a business transaction group as a "disallowed transaction group". The business transactions contained in this group can no longer be used on the order.
Standard group ALL contains all possible transactions for I/O.
Regards,
Eli

External Alphanumeric Number Range for Internal Orders

Hello,
I am trying to create external number range for Internal Order Type. I want to create internal orders which will have internal order number as alphanumeric and some will be in only numbers.
How should be the range look like, so that I have flexibility to enter Internal Order number as whatever format I want i.e. T123, 12MP, 1234, ABCD etc.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks.

how many do you need?
Just one, that covers all?
a0000000 - zzzzzzzz

For internal order settlement rule amount column is requied instead %

Hi Gurus,
For internal order settlement rule percentage is there but business wants to settle from AUC to final asset by amount wise how can we do this.
I tried to change the investment profile but it is coming amount field while saving it is not displaying.
Please help in this regard
Thank you.
Ranganadh

Hi
Check the path
IMG>Controlling>Internal Orders>Actual Posting>Settlement>Maintain Settlement Profile>Maintain Settlement Profile.
Here there is a tick for amount settlement under Indicators. You need to maintain this check box for your requirements.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Settings for costing data in order types for plant maintenance

i want to know the purpose of settings for costing data in order types for plant maintenance. do we need to do it for sure i mean are those settings mandatory to analyze the costs on work order

Yes you need to maintain those settings, as the plant maintenance orders are also considered as cost objects and in order for you to post any cost, you need to have a cost object. Unless you maintain these settings, the cost you posted cannot be settled to a cost center.
Assign points as a way to say thanks.
Madhav Nanduri

BAPI KPF6 POST PLAN COST FOR INTERNAL ORDER AND COST ELEMENT

Hi all gurus,
I would like to use in a custom report a BAPI/Function Module that help me to simulate KPF6 in order to post planning costs for internal order and cost element (layout 1-401).
So the input should be:
1) Version
2) period from
3) periodo to
4) year
5) internal order n.
6) cost element n.
7) value
I found a lot of BAPI but don't know the correct one and how to use it (example how to fill the input value).
Can anyone help me on that?
Kind Regards

In additio to the previous I found the BAPI_COSTACTPLN_POSTPRIMCOST but don't know if it's the correct one and how to use it (some example fitting the my case will be very appreciated).
If the quoted BAPI is correct.
I tested it filling all fields as following:
HEADERINFO:
CO_AREA=FFCA
FISC_YEAR=2008
PERIOD_FROM=001
PERIOD_TO=012
DOC_HDR_TX='blank'
INDEXSTRUCTURE:
OBJECT_INDEX=000001
VALUE_INDEX=000004 (hope this point at Interna Order)
ATTRIB_INDEX=000000
COOBJECT:
OBJECT_INDEX=000001
ORDERID=ZO53-08IMZ
TOTVALUE:
VALUE_INDEX=000004
COST_ELEM=3224048
FIX_VALUE= 200,0000
DIST_KEY_FIX_VAL=2
The Return table is set to 0. Nothing happens.....I suspect something related to indexstructure or index is wrong..
Could anyone help me on that?
Kind Regards

Chaning Order type for Internal order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for