Channel requests

ATTENTION thebear61
Your post was removed to a secure area out of public view because it violates forum posting guidelines.
Forum Guidelines state >>> clickable link http://forums.comcast.com/t5/Forum-Guidelines/Posting-Guidelines/td-p/866289 which everyone should read BEFORE making a first post
Please don't;
Post personal information in the forums
Please do your best to keep your identity and personal information safe. This includes:
Your full name <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Your telephone number
Your Physical/Mailing Address
Email addresses <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Credit Card numbers
Account numbers
Personal public IP addresses
Modem MAC address and / or serial number
Active phishing links
Other personally identifiable information
Here is your post with the information removed;
I would like to request a few channels in general and then some HD versions of existing channels.
First, I would like to see Fox Sports 2, SEC Alternate, Big 10 Plus, and Pac 12 Oregon, Yes Network, New England Sports Network (NESN) added in the Seattle market. All in HD of course. The other competitors, that being Frontier Fios and Wave Broadband carry those in some combination. Also, if possible, and I don't know if they broadcast in hd, Northwest Cable News (NWCN) and all three of the Fox super regional channels, those being Fox Atlantic, Central and Pacific. I have a feeling they don't have hd versions. Just a few suggestions.
Thank you
Ted XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Thank you Becky_S. Just to make it easier, here are some links.
A link in the right direction. Ideas Exchange. Share your ideas.
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/Share-Your-Ideas-with-Verizon/idb-p/ideas
A link to the TV Content Ideas, where you can search for previously requested content, and then Vote. Or post your own request.
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/Share-Your-Ideas-with-Verizon/idb-p/ideas/label-name/fios%20tv%20conten...

Similar Messages

  • Comm Channel - "requested resource does not exist"

    Good day,
    Can someone help me with this error I get. We have a file to file scenario and everything works fine but the file never gets created on the receiver side, all messages says successful but in the comm channel monitor for the receiver adapter I get "Message processing completed successfully" but if I click on the message ID it say's " The requested resource does not exist." [Screen Print|http://www.photostand.co.za/images/t6432okl1tu6wzubwymj.gif]
    Thanks,
    Jan

    Hi Jan,
    Are you able to process messages from other interfaces? If not then there is an issue with the post installation. Please Check the SAP Note: 817920
    If you are not able to process messages only for this interface then there might be a configuration issue..
    Follow the link provided by the other SDNer. Please check and let us know the results.
    Thanks,

  • HTTP Channel request-response

    Hi,
    I have configured HTTP channel for synchronous request response (syncresponse=true in additional headers). I have to send an outbound Invoice to TP via http, get the response back and process it as an email. I have the outbound and inbound agreements set and it works fine. The issue is that I am unable to create a correlation between the request and response (invoice request corresponds to which response). Is there any setting to achieve this?
    Thanks in advance.

    This looks to be known issue. Similar bug was reported for
    Bug 17304428 - hcfpmlr: sync 271 response does not set reference to outbound 270
    There could be one possible solution of using correlation xpaths defined into the document definition, however, this being a sync transfer, it might happen that the outbound msg's xpaths are not persisted into the DB and the response msg xpath for correlation wouldn't find this.
    Hence, for the correlation of sync request and response to work by default the bug should get fixed. Please indicate the same in the bug if fix is required.

  • Local channel request

    I noticed that channel 98, 99, 20 (time warner channel numbers)is not in the lineup for the "local channel" selection in the Los Angeles region.  There are alot of mandarin speakers in this part of California.  There is a paid subscription for the mandarin package that is an extra $ per month,  i believe if you can have 20+ spanish local channels for free you can add these three channels.  Our area,  Diamond Bar is not set to launch Fios until may/june 09'   we will not even consider switching from Time Warner to Fios unless we get those channels.
    Message Edited by fiosdude on 04-01-2009 02:04 AM

    Hello All,
    When I tried different instance of orgservice object in each thread I got following error:
    {"Secure channel cannot be opened because security negotiation with the remote endpoint has failed. This may be due to absent or incorrectly specified EndpointIdentity in the EndpointAddress used to create the channel. Please verify the EndpointIdentity
    specified or implied by the EndpointAddress correctly identifies the remote endpoint. "}
    Inner Exception-The request for security token has invalid or malformed elements.
    Dimaz, I am not using CrmServiceContext. I have created one test project and in that I am only using object of  IOrganizationService and also only execute method.
    Scenario which I understood till now is if we have following two statements which has been used by all threads:
    RetrieveAttributeRequest attributeRequest = new RetrieveAttributeRequest
                        EntityLogicalName =
                            EntityName,
                        LogicalName = optionlist.Key
                    // Execute the request
                    RetrieveAttributeResponse attributeResponse = (RetrieveAttributeResponse)crmDao.Orgservice.Execute(attributeRequest);
                    ICollection<object> values = attributeResponse.Results.Values;
                    OptionMetadataCollection op = null;
                    foreach (PicklistAttributeMetadata lookupobj in values)
                        op = lookupobj.OptionSet.Options;
    And if after creating request object in thread1 if pointer goes to thread 2 and perform some processing in thread 2 and them come back in thread 1,it doesn't have proper token values in Orgservice object and gives above error.
    Please help me with this and also if anyone tried threading application before can I get sample code related to this. I am really stuck up on this very badly...:(

  • Failed to read side-channel request

    Xerox Phaser 6280N, network cabled to an Airport.
    Has worked flawlessly for 18 months, fails today, repeatable on every printing attempt, from any document/program.
    All other computers on the network print successfully.
    Have removed/reinstalled the printer and driver numerous times, also fails when "Generic Postscript Printer" driver is used.
    Any help is appreciated!

    Same problem here. I can't figure out why i get this error
    Log file:
    [2014-Apr-16 12:07:59] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolActive(5)
    [2014-Apr-16 12:07:59] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolInactive(4)
    [2014-Apr-16 12:07:59] RDP (0): Server supports RAIL
    [2014-Apr-16 12:08:00] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolActive(5)
    [2014-Apr-16 12:08:42] RDP (0): Server hides cursor
    [2014-Apr-16 12:08:46] RDP (0): Server shows cursor
    [2014-Apr-16 12:11:09] RDP (0): Server hides cursor
    [2014-Apr-16 12:11:13] RDP (0): Server shows cursor
    [2014-Apr-16 12:11:53] RDP (0): Server hides cursor
    [2014-Apr-16 12:11:55] RDP (0): Server shows cursor
    [2014-Apr-16 12:12:09] RDP (0): Server hides cursor
    [2014-Apr-16 12:15:52] RDP (0): Exception caught: Exception in file '../../librdp/rpcoverhttp.cpp' at line 353
        User Message : Failed to read from channel: -1
    [2014-Apr-16 12:15:52] RDP (0): Exception caught: Exception in file '../../librdp/rpcoverhttp.cpp' at line 353
        User Message : Failed to read from channel: -1
    [2014-Apr-16 12:15:52] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolDisconnecting(7)
    [2014-Apr-16 12:15:52] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolDisconnected(8)
    [2014-Apr-16 12:15:52] RDP (0): ------ END ACTIVE CONNECTION ------
    [2014-Apr-16 12:41:29] RDP (0): Final rdp configuration used: gatewayhostname:s: confidencial
    screen mode id:i:2
    use multimon:i:1
    session bpp:i:24
    full address:s:confidencial
    audiomode:i:0
    username:s: confidencial
    disable wallpaper:i:0
    disable full window drag:i:0
    disable menu anims:i:0
    disable themes:i:0
    alternate shell:s:
    shell working directory:s:
    authentication level:i:2
    connect to console:i:0
    gatewayusagemethod:i:1
    disable cursor setting:i:0
    allow font smoothing:i:1
    allow desktop com"font-family:Helvetica;line-height:normal;" />bookmarktype:i:3
    use redirection server name:i:0

  • Channel Request - El Rey Network

    Merged with existing topic

    El Rey is only available to about 21% of the US.So I am sure Verizon is not the only provider that doesn't carry it.

  • The wait operation timed out. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070102) when requesting for pushNotification channel

    Hi, I have been trying for push Notification Services in Windows 8 Store Apps. I am requesting For notification channel in the following manner
    publicasyncvoidregisterChannelForNotification(
    try
    TileUpdateManager.CreateTileUpdaterForApplication().Clear();
    BadgeUpdateManager.CreateBadgeUpdaterForApplication().Clear();
    varvProfile =
    NetworkInformation.GetInternetConnectionProfile();
    if(vProfile.GetNetworkConnectivityLevel()
    == NetworkConnectivityLevel.InternetAccess)
    varvChannel =
    awaitPushNotificationChannelManager.CreatePushNotificationChannelForApplicationAsync();
    varvBuffer =
    CryptographicBuffer.ConvertStringToBinary(vChannel.Uri,
    BinaryStringEncoding.Utf8);
    varvUri =
    CryptographicBuffer.EncodeToBase64String(vBuffer);
    varvClient =
    newHttpClient();
    try
    varvResponse =
    awaitvClient.GetAsync(newUri(Constants.SERVER_URL));
    if(vResponse.IsSuccessStatusCode)
                                sendDeviceTokenRequest(vChannel.Uri);
    catch(HttpRequestException)
    catch(Exceptionex)
    This gives me the exception,The wait operation timed out. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070102) when requesting for pushNotification channel. What could be the possible reason and how to solve this issue
    Nikhil Sharma10

    Hi,
    I have currently the same problem with requesting a push channel.
    But iam not sure if it is a problem with my phone, or my application.
    I cant get rid of this error. The solution says: "retry the channel request later". But it doesn
    matter if I retry the channel request later (triggerd by pressing a button) the same day or the next day.
    I resetted my windows phone, installed the newest dev preview, but it is still not working. But the same code worked a few months ago. On the same phone.
    Thats why Iam not sure what I changed (accidentally) in my app code which causes now the 0x80070102 error.
    Any ideas why the same code is not working any more?
    Thanks
    Greetings from Germany
    Simon

  • PI 7.0 connecting to WebSphere MQ - Empty payload by reciever channel

    I have PI 7.0 connecting to WMQ 6.0 using JMS adapter.
    The scenario in technical terms is a IDoc to JMS scenario. For one of the message flows, PI delivered an empty message to the MQ queue.
    Having checked the audit logs and the MessagingSystem etc, there were no clues why this happened.
    In the Message monitoring, on the content tab , in the drop down, i could only see the SOAP envelope. The message content wasnt available in the drop down at all.
    Any clues why this may have happened?
    There is no content conversion and we are delivering XML to the queues.

    hi,
    In the Message monitoring, on the content tab , in the drop down, i could only see the SOAP envelope. The message content wasnt available in the drop down at all.
    Ok, but here you see the message received by your JMS, so the interest is limited. You need to compare your source message (idoc) to your target message (JMS). here's how to check.
    Go to SXMB_MONI,  select your message and then "detail" button.
    In the left tree, open the FIRST level called "Inbound Message (CENTRAL)". And under this level check your Payload (should be your Idoc sent by ECC).
    Then, in the same left tree, go to a level before "Call adapter", for instance in "XML validation Outbound Channel Request". Under this level, check your Payload (that should the XML sent to your JMS). Note: do not go in "response" level, because there is certainly no payload.
    What do you have ? does your target payload is empty ? (certainly yes)
    if yes,  that's mean it's your mapping that something is wrong. Certainly a bad context management, due to a missing "SpliByValue" or something like that. And you certainly have one target message with the content of two idoc segment, whereas this one is empty.
    To know which mapping link is bad, in SXMB_MONI, download the source message (so under level "Inbound Message (CENTRAL)", and test it i your Message Mapping.
    regards.
    mickael

  • Sender AS2 MDN XML Channel error

    Hi,
    I am trying to configure a sender AS2 adapter to receive asynchronous MDN. But as soon as I create the channel ,it goes in error "Channel configuration is erroneous: java.nio.charset.UnsupportedCharsetException: The target charset iso885915 is not supported".
    1. I don't see any other option to configure character set once AS2 MDN transport protocol is selected. Am I missing any configuration?
    2. Also I am testing from mendelson and as per the mendelson log MDN is sent to PI system but I do not see any MDN in PI. We are using B2B addon SP1 on PI 7.11.
    mendelson log :
    [3:27:36 PM] mendelson_opensource_AS2-1407405456031-5@EDI_Partner_EDI_Partner: Outgoing MDN has not been signed.
    [3:27:36 PM] mendelson_opensource_AS2-1407405456031-5@EDI_Partner_EDI_Partner: MDN created, state set to [processed].
    [3:27:36 PM] mendelson_opensource_AS2-1407405456031-5@EDI_Partner_EDI_Partner: Sending async MDN to http://<PI_Host>:50000/AS2/AS2_Sender/mdn.
    [3:27:36 PM] mendelson_opensource_AS2-1407405456031-5@EDI_Partner_EDI_Partner: Message sent successfully (HTTP 200); 791 Byte transfered in 353ms [2.19 KB/s].
    [3:27:36 PM] 17ef0d18-1e19-11e4-c6b8-0000004bc76a@PI7: AS2 communication successful, payload 1 has been moved to "C:\Users\Pankaj\Desktop\mendelson\opensource\as2\messages\EDI_Partner\inbox\17ef0d18_1e19_11e4_c6b8_0000004bc76a@PI7".

    Hi Pankaj,
    This is what I did:
    The most important parts of the configuration are
    Receiver AS2 communication channel, requesting a synchronous MDN message
    Sender AS2  communication channel processing the incoming MDN message
    Receiver AS2 communication channel
    Sender AS2  communication channel
    Within the SAP PO monitoring tools, you see something like this:
    Kind regards,
    Dimitri

  • How do I find the Discovery Channel in the on demand menu?

    Look under networks.

    linuxgeek wrote:
    @enonorez, I did not see the Discovery Channel on U-verse's on demand menu, too. Since Discovery Channel is not offered by AT&T U-verse via on demand, you would have to go to the AT&T U-verse channel request website and make a request for Discovery Channel On Demand.
    They already know users want Discovery networks on On Demand, I'd bet it shows up on next contract renewal like CBS On Demand showed up for everyone on recent CBS renewal.
    Chris
    Please NO SD stretch-o-vision or 480 SD HD Channels
    Need Help? PM ATT Uverse Care (all service problems)
    ATT Customer Care(billing and all other problems)
    Your Results May Vary, In My Humble Opinion
    I Call It Like I See It, Simply a U-verse user, nothing more

  • [Cisco FAQ] - What is DOCSIS 3.0 Upstream Channel Bonding?

    describe what it does.

    DOCSIS 3.0 required that CM must have 4 or more upstream channel transmitters. This translates into the
    possibility of 100mbps+ upstream rate…
    Removed DOCSIS 2.0/1.x single request-grant cycle bottleneck.
    Bonded Flows allow multiple outstanding BW-REQ.
    BW can be requested on any of the bonded upstream channels
    Requests can be granted on any of the bonded upstream channels
    Reduced upstream latency (TCP ACK) also increases DS throughput. [TCP application]
    Bonds multiple, physical upstream transmit channels to form a larger, logical upstream channel.

  • Unable to see pipe line steps in the SXMB_MONI

    HI,
    i have done the development and quality work for my p i7.1
    i was testing the messages in the Quality System.
    So i went to SXMB_MONI to see the messages.
    After double clicking on the  successfully processed message, it shows
    pipe line steps.
    in that I am able to see
    1.inbound message(CENTRAL)
    2.XML Validation inbound channel Request
    3. call adapter
    4. Response
    but i am unable to see
    1. Receiver Determination
    2. Interface Determination
    3. Receiver Grouping
    4. Request Message Mapping
    5. Technical Routing
    whereas  in the develoment system i am able to see the above all.
    is there any configuration i have to do in the SXMB_ADM?

    can i know that   Configuration objects were created/ imported by using transport mechanisum?
    if created ,
    check the cache status and re activated those objects whatever u r posted in thread.
    if transported :
    u ll follow ,whatever posted by Earlier

  • New Customer: Installer Destroyed DVD

    Help, folks...I have never had a worse installation. I used to do this for a living but physically disabled (my hands) for a few years now.
    March 18: The installer lost one of my telephones, the one in my office. It took me over four hours to finally find it wrapped in wires behind a tower-style computer. He also left my office in shambles. He was rude.
    It turned out that contrary to my request to keep my phone number, Verizon issued a new phone number and I was not aware of that until four days later when a frantic friend knocked on my door. I am housebound a lot due to physical disability.
    Because of the phone screw-up, I could not cancel my Comcast account until March 25. Therefore, this error cost me an entire extra week with Comcast.
    I did call Verizon when I found that my channel request had been ignored. Bad job all the way around.
    The initial salesperson said I would not be billed until April 23. Then I had a bill due April 15.
    Lastly but not least, when I said to the installer to please not disrupt any of my components attached to my home theatre, he assured me that he would not. However, after he left, my DVD player-writer (Panasonic) stopped functioning. I have made two long phone calls the past 8 days with assurances that this error would be corrected in person.
    I just checked the trouble ticket, and it says there are no open trouble tickets!!!
    Both technicians over past week said that there was no way that the installer could have installed the Verizon set-top box without disrupting the DVD player. They both said that they would get a technician on site and that I would be credited for that visit. They both said they would confirm with me by phone within 24-48 hours. I never heard from either of them.
    June 3: Third attempt over the phone: This rep was very abrupt and rude—he said it was not Verizon’s equipment. I had to explain AGAIN that Verizon’s installer had done something wrong because my component was fine until the Verizon installation. He then said he could get a technician out Friday afternoon. June 6.
    Anyone know who to contact at Corporate? Over two  months of Verizon hell makes me wonder why I switched from Comcast.

    Hi Ibutterfly,
    Your issue has been escalated to a Verizon agent. Before the agent can begin assisting you, they will need to collect further information from you. Please go to your profile page for the forum and look at the top of the middle column where you will find an area titled "My Support Cases". You can reach your profile page by clicking on your name beside your post, or at the top left of this page underneath the title of the board.
    Under "My Support Cases" you will find a link to the private board where you and the agent may exchange information. This should be checked on a frequent basis, as the agent may be waiting for information from you before they can proceed with any actions. To ensure you know when they have responded to you, at the top of your support case there is a drop down menu for support case options. Open that and choose "subscribe". Please keep all correspondence regarding your issue in the private support portal.

  • Ping timeouts at server and broken pipes at client

    I am experiencing unexpected broken pipe exceptions at the client side of a coherence server. These exceptions prevent our code to establish a connection to the cache server.
    Due to network restrictions, we are connecting client and server through Coherence*Extend.
    At the server side, the logs show the following message:
    DEBUG Coherence:3 - 2013-02-01 11:12:20.584/85.322 Oracle Coherence GE 3.7.1.5 <D6> (thread=Proxy:TcpProxyServicePof:TcpAcceptor, member=1): Closed: TcpConnection(Id=0x0000013C953D8F150AA202D9F632E5EAFD6BDDE1A713F026C65BC1E7CC1E5952, Open=false, Member(Id=0, Timestamp=2013-02-01 11:11:44.404, Address=127.0.0.1:0, MachineId=0, Location=site:,process:1612, Role=WeblogicServer), LocalAddress=10.162.2.217:28088, RemoteAddress=10.162.2.231:45202) due to:
    com.tangosol.net.messaging.ConnectionException: TcpConnection(Id=0x0000013C953D8F150AA202D9F632E5EAFD6BDDE1A713F026C65BC1E7CC1E5952, Open=true, Member(Id=0, Timestamp=2013-02-01 11:11:44.404, Address=127.0.0.1:0, MachineId=0, Location=site:,process:1612, Role=WeblogicServer), LocalAddress=10.162.2.217:28088, RemoteAddress=10.162.2.231:45202): did not receive a response to a ping within 500 millis
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Peer.checkPingTimeout(Peer.CDB:12)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.peer.Acceptor.checkPingTimeouts(Acceptor.CDB:7)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Peer.onNotify(Peer.CDB:115)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.CDB:42)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
    And at the client side:
    ERROR (01/02/2013) 11:12:20 [threadsafe]Thread-15/AbstractComponentHandler Unable to create new instance 45067 ms
    com.tangosol.net.messaging.ConnectionException: TcpConnection(Id=0x0000013C953D8F150AA202D9F632E5EAFD6BDDE1A713F026C65BC1E7CC1E5952, Open=true, Member(Id=0, Timestamp=2013-02-01 11:11:44.404, Address=127.0.0.1:0, MachineId=0, Location=site:,process:1612, Role=WeblogicServer), LocalAddress=10.162.2.231:45202, RemoteAddress=10.162.2.217:28088)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.peer.initiator.TcpInitiator$TcpConnection.send(TcpInitiator.CDB:35)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Peer.send(Peer.CDB:29)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Peer.post(Peer.CDB:23)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.extend.Channel.post(Channel.CDB:25)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.extend.Channel.request(Channel.CDB:18)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.extend.Channel.request(Channel.CDB:1)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.extend.RemoteNamedCache$BinaryCache.putAll(RemoteNamedCache.CDB:10)
    at com.tangosol.util.ConverterCollections$ConverterMap.putAll(ConverterCollections.java:1708)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.extend.RemoteNamedCache.putAll(RemoteNamedCache.CDB:1)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.SafeNamedCache.putAll(SafeNamedCache.CDB:1)
    at com.tangosol.net.cache.CachingMap.putAll(CachingMap.java:1023)
    Caused by: java.net.SocketException: Write failed: Broken pipe
    at jrockit.net.SocketNativeIO.writeBytesPinned(Native Method)
    at jrockit.net.SocketNativeIO.socketWrite(SocketNativeIO.java:46)
    at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite0(SocketOutputStream.java)
    at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite(SocketOutputStream.java:92)
    at java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:136)
    at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.java:65)
    at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.write(BufferedOutputStream.java:104)
    at java.io.DataOutputStream.write(DataOutputStream.java:90)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.peer.initiator.TcpInitiator$TcpConnection.send(TcpInitiator.CDB:27)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Peer.send(Peer.CDB:29)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Peer.post(Peer.CDB:23)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.extend.Channel.post(Channel.CDB:25)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.extend.Channel.request(Channel.CDB:18)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.extend.Channel.request(Channel.CDB:1)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.extend.RemoteNamedCache$BinaryCache.putAll(RemoteNamedCache.CDB:10)
    at com.tangosol.util.ConverterCollections$ConverterMap.putAll(ConverterCollections.java:1703)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.extend.RemoteNamedCache.putAll(RemoteNamedCache.CDB:1)
    at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.SafeNamedCache.putAll(SafeNamedCache.CDB:1)
    at com.tangosol.net.cache.CachingMap.putAll(CachingMap.java:1023)
    I can ping the client machine from the server without a problem.
    Has anybody seen this before?
    Edited by: 982740 on Feb 1, 2013 2:29 AM

    Hi user,
    It seems from the log that when the proxy node accepts your client connection the client fails to respond to a ping request down the same pipe. Does this happen consistently? If so, no putAll would ever succeed.
    I have to admit I've never seen this behaviour before. I can't see how this would be a firewall port issue, as the connection has been established... the only things I can think of would be a) your weblogic client node is running way to hot and doesn't respond to the grids ping request in time, b) Some very aggressive network infrastructure is killing the connection just after its created, or c) aliens are interfering with your system.
    sorry I can't be of more help,
    Andy

  • Since upgrading to OSX 10.6.8, I am unable to use scp on a remote machine to copy files into my iMac.

    Any suggestions?
    However, I can use scp to copy files out from my iMac (10.6.8) .
    I can ssh into the iMac OK.
    I created a .profile in my iMac home directory with the single line "export TERM=xterm-color".
    This makes a difference to how scp behaves when attempting to copy into the iMac, but it still fails.
    Thanks in advance for any help.  Peter R
    Here is the scp debug output (on the remote machine that I'm copying a file from, to the iMac):
    ===
    Executing: program /usr/bin/ssh host molika.ucsd.edu, user prowat, command scp -v -t Desktop/FromPelican/Outs201201.pdf
    Sun_SSH_1.1.3, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090704f
    debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
    debug1: Rhosts Authentication disabled, originating port will not be trusted.
    debug1: ssh_connect: needpriv 0
    debug1: Connecting to molika.ucsd.edu [137.110.243.133] port 22.
    debug1: Connection established.
    debug1: identity file /home/nona/.ssh/identity type -1
    debug1: identity file /home/nona/.ssh/id_rsa type -1
    debug1: identity file /home/nona/.ssh/id_dsa type -1
    debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version OpenSSH_5.2
    debug1: match: OpenSSH_5.2 pat OpenSSH*
    debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
    debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-Sun_SSH_1.1.3
    debug1: use_engine is 'yes'
    debug1: pkcs11 engine initialized, now setting it as default for RSA, DSA, and symmetric ciphers
    debug1: pkcs11 engine initialization complete
    debug1: Failed to acquire GSS-API credentials for any mechanisms (No credentials were supplied, or the credentials were unavailable or inaccessible
    Unknown code 0
    debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
    debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
    debug1: kex: server->client aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none
    debug1: kex: client->server aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none
    debug1: Peer sent proposed langtags, ctos:
    debug1: Peer sent proposed langtags, stoc:
    debug1: We proposed langtags, ctos: i-default
    debug1: We proposed langtags, stoc: i-default
    debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST sent
    debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP
    debug1: dh_gen_key: priv key bits set: 124/256
    debug1: bits set: 1007/2048
    debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent
    debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY
    debug1: Host 'molika.ucsd.edu' is known and matches the RSA host key.
    debug1: Found key in /home/nona/.ssh/known_hosts:1
    debug1: bits set: 1043/2048
    debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct
    debug1: newkeys: mode 1
    debug1: set_newkeys: setting new keys for 'out' mode
    debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
    debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS
    debug1: newkeys: mode 0
    debug1: set_newkeys: setting new keys for 'in' mode
    debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
    debug1: done: ssh_kex2.
    debug1: send SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST
    debug1: got SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT
    debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive
    debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
    debug1: Trying private key: /home/nona/.ssh/identity
    debug1: Trying private key: /home/nona/.ssh/id_rsa
    debug1: Trying private key: /home/nona/.ssh/id_dsa
    debug1: Next authentication method: keyboard-interactive
    *** Password requested & supplied
    debug1: Authentication succeeded (keyboard-interactive)
    debug1: fd 5 setting O_NONBLOCK
    debug1: fd 6 setting O_NONBLOCK
    debug1: fd 7 setting O_NONBLOCK
    debug1: channel 0: new [client-session]
    debug1: send channel open 0
    debug1: Entering interactive session.
    debug1: ssh_session2_setup: id 0
    debug1: channel request 0: env
    debug1: Sending command: scp -v -t Desktop/FromPelican/Outs201201.pdf
    debug1: channel request 0: exec
    debug1: channel 0: open confirm rwindow 0 rmax 32768
    ~
    debug1: channel 0: read<=0 rfd 5 len 0
    debug1: channel 0: read failed
    debug1: channel 0: close_read
    debug1: channel 0: input open -> drain
    debug1: channel 0: ibuf empty
    debug1: channel 0: send eof
    debug1: channel 0: input drain -> closed
    debug1: channel 0: write failed
    debug1: channel 0: close_write
    debug1: channel 0: output open -> closed
    debug1: channel 0: rcvd eof
    debug1: client_input_channel_req: channel 0 rtype exit-status reply 0
    debug1: channel 0: rcvd close
    debug1: channel 0: almost dead
    debug1: channel 0: gc: notify user
    debug1: channel 0: gc: user detached
    debug1: channel 0: send close
    debug1: channel 0: is dead
    debug1: channel 0: garbage collecting
    debug1: channel_free: channel 0: client-session, nchannels 1
    debug1: fd 0 clearing O_NONBLOCK
    debug1: fd 1 clearing O_NONBLOCK
    debug1: fd 2 clearing O_NONBLOCK
    debug1: Transferred: stdin 0, stdout 0, stderr 0 bytes in 0.9 seconds
    debug1: Bytes per second: stdin 0.0, stdout 0.0, stderr 0.0
    debug1: Exit status 0

    On looking at the secure.log on the iMac with OSX10.6.8, I see these entries at each attempt to scp into the iMac:
    Dec 29 11:06:20 molika sshd[7248]: in pam_sm_authenticate(): Failed to determine Kerberos principal name.
    Dec 29 11:06:26 molika sshd[7246]: Accepted keyboard-interactive/pam for prowat from 137.110.243.132 port 35571 ssh2
    Dec 29 11:06:26 molika com.apple.SecurityServer[26]: Session 0x236a14 created
    Dec 29 11:06:26 molika com.apple.SecurityServer[26]: Session 0x236a14 attributes 0x20
    Dec 29 11:06:27 molika com.apple.SecurityServer[26]: Session 0x236a14 dead
    Dec 29 11:06:27 molika com.apple.SecurityServer[26]: Killing auth hosts
    Dec 29 11:06:27 molika com.apple.SecurityServer[26]: Session 0x236a14 destroyed
    I don't know what to make of this.
    Peter R

Maybe you are looking for