Characteristic issue in Query

Hi:
I have a question regarding a query. I have a multicube created from the Sales Overview cube and a cube which holds plan data.
I have a a charactrisitcs 0CUST_SALES__0CUST_GROUP (master data) in Identification checked for the both cubes.
When I run a query created on this cube for sales wty, The value shows up correctly. But when I drill down by 0CUST_SALES__0CUST_GROUP, the characteristic value is Not assigned.
I checked 0CUST_SALES and I have the value for the field 0CUST_SALES__0CUST_GROUP. Why system shows #- not assigned when I drill down by this particular characteristic?

Hi Sunil,
Do you have any other characteristic in the query rows , or any other characteristic restricted in the query that is from only one basic Cube?
Also check by running reports if you have data in Basic cubes by 0CUST_SALES__0CUST_GROUP .
Vijay.

Similar Messages

Issue In query output

Hello Gurus,
I am having an issue with query output.Please find below the details of it
Unsold claims: Total---> 200
Dispatch: Total--->118,086
Unsold claims/dispatch--->0.001694
This should be the output but its coming --.0033120 because itu2019s dividing with max value in dispatch which is 60,386.
Reason: The aggregation property of Dispatch is max value. I am not supposed to do any changes in Modeling. So can we do any thing at reporting level to get the desired output?
Desired output---->0.001694
Output coming---->.0033120
Please help me in getting the desired output at query level.
Regards,

solved with the help of nested exception aggregation

View Link Editor Issue - empty query clause if based on association

JDeveloper 10.1.2
Setup:
- entities A and B
- a 1 to * association from entity A to entity B (A_B_association)
- a view of A based on entity A (AView)
- a view of B based on entity B (BView)
- BView has an expert mode query
Create a view link from table A to table B:
- choose the A_B_association under AView for the source attribute
- choose the A_B_association under BView for the destination attribute
- click add
- click next
issue: the query clause is empty
- click next:
info dialog pops up;
title = "Business Components"
message = "Restoring the default where clause."
Note, however, that creating a view link based on the attributes works. That is, if I choose the primary key attribute under AView for the source attribute, and the corresponding foreign key attribute under BView for the destination attribute, then the wizard generates the expected query clause.
If I create a new project and recreate the entities, the views, and the association, then I can successfully create a view link based on the association. The foreignKey value on the association end was different in the new association XML file. I modifed the old XML file so that it used the same foreignKey element, but that did not seem to work.
I am guessing that this is some sort of user error on my part or that we have otherwise managed to squat up our XML files.
Any tips, hints, or ideas appreciated.
Thanks,
Steve

The problem is in AView.
We had modified the AView at one point, then reverted it to a default view of entity A. Here, "a default view" means that we undid our custom changes (apparently not thoroughly enough); that is, we did not delete it and create a default view from scratch using the contextual menu on the A entity.
The bottom line is that the AView attributes were not being mapped to the entity -- they were showing up as calculated attributes.
We created a "New Default View Object..." from the contextual menu of entity A, then manually corrected the AView.xml file to solve the problem.

Dump when trying to display characteristic values in QUERY DESIGNER

Hi Experts,
Life seems to become a struggle with 7.0 for me :-(.
My current problem:
If I try to display characteristic values in Query Designer (left section of screnn, wthin dimensions) system dumps frequently.
It's that kind of dump, that doen't help really (to my oponion)_
What happened?
    The exception 'CX_RSR_X_MESSAGE' was raised, but it was not caught anywhere
     along
    the call hierarchy.
    Since exceptions represent error situations and this error was not
    adequately responded to, the running ABAP program
     'CL_RSBOLAP_BICS_SERVICES======CP' has to be
    terminated.
How to correct the error
    If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
    find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
    If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
    keywords:
    "UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION" "CX_RSR_X_MESSAGE"
    "CL_RSBOLAP_BICS_SERVICES======CP" or "CL_RSBOLAP_BICS_SERVICES======CM003"
    "HANDLE_UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION"
... etc.
BW 79, SP21
GUI 7100.4.14.3136
Any ideas?
Thanks in Advance and Regards
Joe

Hi Vikram,
Thanks for reply. Reinstalling GUI was successful, but - error still occurs. ..
Regards
Joe
Edited by: J.F.B. on May 28, 2010 3:02 PM

All Dates displayed for "Characteristic Values" in Query Designer

Hello Experts,
We are on BI 7.0, level 13. I am having an issue within the Query Designer with regards to dates. I have a write-optimized DSO that contains 3 date fields (for example, ZDATE1, ZDATE2, and ZDATE3). Each date InfoObject is of type DATS so the system automatically creates it with reference to 0DATE.
When I create a query in the Query Designer, on the left hand side, I expand the "Characteristic Values" node under each date field. The Query Designer shows the same list of values for each of the 3 dates even though they are not valid values posted in the DSO for those fields.
For example, ZDATE1 only has 1 value posted in the DSO (01/01/2005).
ZDATE2 only has 1 value posted in the DSO (01/01/2006).
ZDATE3 only has 1 value posted in the DSO (01/01/2007).
Bute when I expand the "Characteristic Values" node in the Query Designer, I see ALL THREE values under each date field. I would expect to only see the 1 value posted for the InfoObject in the DSO. Also note that each InfoObject is defined to show "Only posted values in InfoProvider".
It appears that Query Designer will show all values for the reference InfoObject 0DATE instead of the ones posted to the actual InfoObject in the DSO. If I delete the data in the DSO, the Characteristic Values list still remains because they exist in 0DATE. Anyone encounter this before? How can I get the Characteristic Values list to only show posted values for that InfObject?
Thanks for your help!
J

Thanks for the response. I went into the DSO and right clicked on each of the Date fields. I looked at the Provider-specific properties and there is the option for "Query Exec.FilterVal" which only restricts what values appear when restricting during execution, not during query creation.
Is there someplace else I should look or someplace else I can make change to only display posted dates when creating a query? Thanks!

Question on Sorting Characteristic in Bex query (3.5)

I have a report that has a few key figures and 7 or 8 characteristics. I would like to sort the whole report on one characterictic that lies in the 4th column from the most left of report without actually swapping it with the characteristic in the first column? I have tried just right clicking on the characteristic and using the sort option (ascending/decending), and this does not sort that column at all. It seems all columns by default are sorted by order starting at the most left hand side (first column - first characteristic). If I display that characteristic in the first column, it works, but I do not want to lose my original layout. I would like to achieve this without doing any swaps? Anyone, have any ideas on this?

i dont know this issue is visible to u
when i tried i had 2 options for sorting for all characteristics in columns in query
they were
AS IN QUERY
CHARACTERISITC
so for all characteristics i have follwong sorting options
so y dont u try to select sort by chara in 4th columns
and keep rest of chars sorting option by AS IN QUERY.

Performance issues with query input variable selection in ODS

Hi everyone
We've upgraded from BW 3.0B to NW04s BI using SP12.
There is a problem encountered with input variable selection. This happens regardless of using BEx (new or old 3.x) or using RSRT. When using the F4 search help (or "Select from list" in BEx context) to list possible values, this takes forever for large ODS (containing millions of records).
Using ST01 and SM50 to trace the code in the same query, we see a difference here:
NW04s BI SQL command
SELECT
"P0000"."COMP_CODE" AS "0000000032" ,"T0000"."TXTMD" AS "0000000032_TXTMD"
FROM
( "/BI0/PCOMP_CODE" "P0000" ) LEFT OUTER JOIN "/BI0/TCOMP_CODE" "T0000" ON "P0000"."COMP_CODE" = "T0000
"."COMP_CODE"
WHERE
"P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "P0000"."COMP_CODE" IN ( SELECT "O"."COMP_CODE" AS "KEY" FROM
"/BI0/APY_PP_C100" "O" )
ORDER BY
"P0000"."COMP_CODE" ASC#
BW 3.0B SQL command:
SELECT ROWNUM < 500 ....
In 3.0B, rownum is limited to 500 and this results in a speedy, though limited query. In the new NW04s BI, this renders the selection screen unusable as ABAP dumps for timing out will occur first due to the large data volume searched using sequential read.
It will not be feasible to create indexes for every single query selection parameter (issues with oerformance when loading, space required etc.). Is there a reason why SAP seems have fallen back on a less effective code for this?
I have tried to change the number of selected rows to <500 in BEx settings but one must reach a responsive screen in order to get to that setting and it is not always possible or saved for the next run.
Anyone with similar experience or can provide help on this?

here is a reason why the F4 help on ODS was faster in BW 3.x.
In BW 3.x the ODS did not support the read mode "Only values in
InfoProvider". So If I compare the different SQL statements I propose
to change the F4 mode in the InfoProvider specific properties to
"About master data". This is the fastest F4 mode.
As an alternative you can define indexes on your ODS to speed up F4.
So would need a non-unique index on InfoObject 0COMP_CODE in your ODS
Check below for insights
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=6224682&messageID=2841493
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP..

Check and validate the characteristic row in query

Hi Gurus,
I am really new to BW, may be a silly question. I Have requirement where I have query, which had characteristic status having value for open closed items as O and C. Now i need the query to look if status is O,then it should move amount feild as zero .I am not sure where to put the code.
It is really urgent, any help would be highly appreciable.
Thanks in adavance

Hi Amit,
Thanks for response, I could not find any exit in the query..So i though I should do the changes and see...on my own. I would repeat my query and may be some one
can provide me some solution.
I have rows which have selection for item status as fixed values equal to '#', cleared
and open. And the query has key figure in colums as amount.
So i need my query to read item status and if that is open it should display amount as 0.
I hope i had made this more explainatory now
quick response would be highly appreciable.
its really urgent
Mona

Issue while query execution on web analyser.

Hi,
I am getting an error message while query execution on web ie Record set too large , data retrieval restricted by configuration .I am able to run the same query in bex analyser without any issue .Any idea what could be the reason and solution for this issue .
Regards,
Neetika.

Hi Neetika,
The Query is exceeding the set limits,i suggest you to Reduce the time LIne for the Query, as it may be having more number of Cells in terms of Rows and Columns.
Execute the Query for Less number of Days,if u r executing it for 1 Month then execute it for 10 Days.
Rgds
SVU123

Performance issue on query. Help needed.

This is mainly a performance issue. I hope someone can help me on this.
Basically I have four tables Master (150000 records), Child1 (100000+ records), Child2 (50 million records !), Child 3 (10000+ records)
(please pardon the aliases).
Now every record in master has more than one corresponding record in each of the child tables (one to many).
Also there may not be any record in any or all of the tables for a particular master record.
Now, I need to fetch the max of last_updated_date for every master record in each of the 3 child tables and then find the maximum of
the three last_active_dates obtained from the 3 tables.
eg: for Master ID 100, I need to query Child1 for all the records of Master ID 100 and get the max last_updated_date.
Same for the other 2 tables and then get the maximum of these three values.
(I also need to take care of cases where no record may be found in a child table for a Master ID)
Writing a procedure that uses cursors that fetches the value from each of the child table hits performance
badly. And thing is I need to find out the last_updated_date for every Master record (all 150000 of them). It'll probably take days to do this.
SELECT MAX (C1.LAST_UPDATED_DATE)
,MAX (C2.LAST_UPDATED_DATE)
,MAX (C3.LAST_UPDATED_DATE)
FROM CHILD1 C1
,CHILD2 C2
,CHILD3 C3
WHERE C1.MASTER_ID = 100
OR C2.MASTER_ID = 100
OR C3.MASTER_ID = 100
I tried the above but I got a temp tablespace error. I don't think the query is good enough at all.
(The OR clause is to take care of no records in any child table. If there's an AND, then the join and hence select will
fail even if there is no record in one child table but valid values in the other 2 tables).
Thanks a lot.
Edited by: user773489 on Dec 16, 2008 11:49 AM

Not sure I understand the problem. The max you are getting from the above is already the greatest out of the three - that's why we do the UNION ALL.
Here's sample code without output, maybe this will clear it up:
with a as (
select 10 MASTER_ID, to_date('12/15/2008', 'MM/DD/YYYY') LAST_DTE from dual UNION ALL
select 20 MASTER_ID, to_date('12/01/2008', 'MM/DD/YYYY') LAST_DTE from dual UNION ALL
select 30 MASTER_ID, to_date('12/02/2008', 'MM/DD/YYYY') LAST_DTE from dual
b as (
select 10 MASTER_ID, to_date('12/14/2008', 'MM/DD/YYYY') LAST_DTE from dual UNION ALL
select 20 MASTER_ID, to_date('12/02/2008', 'MM/DD/YYYY') LAST_DTE from dual UNION ALL
select 40 MASTER_ID, to_date('11/15/2008', 'MM/DD/YYYY') LAST_DTE from dual
c as (
select 10 MASTER_ID, to_date('12/07/2008', 'MM/DD/YYYY') LAST_DTE from dual UNION ALL
select 30 MASTER_ID, to_date('11/29/2008', 'MM/DD/YYYY') LAST_DTE from dual UNION ALL
select 40 MASTER_ID, to_date('12/13/2008', 'MM/DD/YYYY') LAST_DTE from dual
select MASTER_ID, MAX(LAST_DTE)
FROM
(select MASTER_ID, LAST_DTE from a UNION ALL
select MASTER_ID, LAST_DTE from b UNION ALL
select MASTER_ID, LAST_DTE from c)
group by MASTER_ID;
MASTER_ID              MAX(LAST_DTE)
30                     02-DEC-08
40                     13-DEC-08
20                     02-DEC-08
10                     15-DEC-08
4 rows selectedEdited by: tk-7381344 on Dec 16, 2008 12:38 PM

Issue with Query on a virtual infoprovider

Hello,
I am getting the following error message while executing a query on a virtual infoprovider. We have recently gone through upgrade from BI 3.5 to BI 7.0 EHP1 (SP5) and from SEM BCS 4.0 to BCS 6.0.
EVersion not specified or not unique                                                             UCR0                006
EError reading the data of InfoProvider ZBCS_CV11                                    DBMAN             305ZBCS_CV11
EError while reading data; navigation is possible                                          BRAIN               289
I>> Row: 11 Inc: RAISE_READ_ERROR Prog: CL_RSDRV_VPROV_BASE   RS_EXCEPTION        301CL_RSDRV_VPROV_BASE
this query has been running fine before the upgrade. In the selection screen there are two fields - version1 and version2, if I am specifying same value in both the fields then the query runs fine and if I am providing different values then the above stated error message appears.
I have tried different settings with properties - Read mode: H,A,X and also different combination from the properties of the virtual infoprovider - with and w/o hierarchies; with and w/o navigation attributes but it did not workout.
the only thing which has changed on this virtual provider is that I had enabled delta caching as this was supposed to be used in a multiprovider.
Has anyone experienced similar issue or have an idea as to what is going wrong here. Please advice.
Regards,
Manish

Hi Manish,
I have exactly the same issue with a query on a virtual infoprovider after upgrading from BI 3.5 to BI 7.0 EHP1 (SP5) and from SEM BCS 4.0 to BCS 6.0.
Would you be so kind to tell me how you fixed this. (other queries seem to be working)
Kind regards,
Jamie Flaxman

Issue with query for AR transactions posted to GL

Hi all,
I'm using Oracle R12.1.3.
I have a report similar to Account Analysis Report which displays Transactions posted to GL.
I have the following issue:
In the result of the report if an AR transaction has 2 lines or more I get multiplication of them. So my question is how can I identify which AR transaction line is linked to GL line number?
Here is my query:
SELECT DISTINCT GJH.JE_HEADER_ID,
GJL.JE_LINE_NUM,
PARTY.PARTY_NAME CUSTOMER_VENDOR,
RCT.TRX_NUMBER TRANS_NUMBER,
SUBSTR(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(SUBSTR(CTL.DESCRIPTION, 1, 2000), CHR(13), ''), CHR(10), ''), CHR(9), ''), CHR(11), ''), CHR(12), ''), 1, 100) DESCRIPTION,
NVL(xal.entered_dr, 0) - NVL(xal.entered_cr, 0) amount,
CTL.*
FROM GL.GL_JE_HEADERS GJH,
GL.GL_JE_LINES GJL,
GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS GCC,
GL.GL_PERIODS GLP,
GL.GL_IMPORT_REFERENCES IMP,
XLA.XLA_AE_LINES XAL,
XLA.XLA_AE_HEADERS XAH,
XLA.XLA_EVENTS XE,
XLA.XLA_TRANSACTION_ENTITIES XTE,
RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL RCT,
HZ_PARTIES PARTY,
AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS CA,
GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_KFV CC,
AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES_ALL CTL,
AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL CTLD
WHERE 1 = 1
AND GJH.JE_HEADER_ID = GJL.JE_HEADER_ID
-- AND GJL.STATUS || '' = 'P'
AND GCC.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = CTLD.CODE_COMBINATION_ID
AND GJH.PERIOD_NAME = GLP.PERIOD_NAME
AND RCT.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID = CTLD.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID
AND CTLD.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID = CTL.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID
AND ctld.customer_trx_id = RCT.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID
-- AND GLP.ADJUSTMENT_PERIOD_FLAG <> 'Y'
AND GJH.JE_SOURCE = 'Receivables'
AND GJL.JE_HEADER_ID = IMP.JE_HEADER_ID
AND GJL.JE_LINE_NUM = IMP.JE_LINE_NUM
AND IMP.GL_SL_LINK_ID = XAL.GL_SL_LINK_ID
AND IMP.GL_SL_LINK_TABLE = XAL.GL_SL_LINK_TABLE
AND XAL.APPLICATION_ID = XAH.APPLICATION_ID
AND XAL.AE_HEADER_ID = XAH.AE_HEADER_ID
AND XAH.APPLICATION_ID = XE.APPLICATION_ID
AND XAH.EVENT_ID = XE.EVENT_ID
AND XE.APPLICATION_ID = XTE.APPLICATION_ID
AND XTE.APPLICATION_ID = 222
AND XE.ENTITY_ID = XTE.ENTITY_ID
AND XTE.ENTITY_CODE = 'TRANSACTIONS'
AND XTE.SOURCE_ID_INT_1 = RCT.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID
AND RCT.BILL_TO_CUSTOMER_ID = CA.CUST_ACCOUNT_ID
AND CA.PARTY_ID = PARTY.PARTY_ID
AND rcT.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID = ctl.CUSTOMER_TRX_Id
AND CTL.LINE_TYPE = 'LINE'
AND XAL.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = CC.CODE_COMBINATION_ID
AND RCT.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID = 8857929
AND GJL.JE_LINE_NUM = 8866
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Stoyanov.

Hi Stoyanov,
Please try using the table xla_distribution_links to join with ra_cust_trx_line_gl_dist_all by using
xla_distribution_links.source_distribution_id_num_1 = ra_cust_trx_line_gl_dist_all.cust_trx_line_gl_dist_id
The below link gives the join conditions for various sub ledger types :
Techincal: R12 SLA Tables connection to AP, AR, INV,Payments, Receiving
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Manjusha.

How to restrict values and apply condition for a characteristic in a query.

Hi,
I have to add two customer class(characteristic) fields to my query which is available as a navigational attribute in my multiprovider ( from which my query is built ).
One field should give the values directly from master data. The values would be PV, CV, IT, OT. The other field should give only PV and CV based on the condition - Except CV, all others (ie. IT and OT) should be converted as PV.
I like this to be achieved in the query level since i dont want to disturb the underlying cubes in the multicube.
So i have two questions.
1. How to bring two fields in the query for the same characteristic.
2. How to achieve the condition in a characteristic for second customer class field mentioned above.
Could somebody help me in solving this?
Thanks in advance,
Somenath

Hi Somenath,
you are absolutely right;)
Besides the Third step
Try to add two new Selections to your Structure as
New Selection1 -> Set the Customer Class value to fix 'PV'
New Selection2 -> Set the Customer Class value to fix 'CV'
you have to add
New Selection3 -> Set the Customer Class value to fix 'IT'
New Selection4 -> Set the Customer Class value to fix 'OT'
Fourth step
Hide these four selections
Fifth step: Add a new formula to your Structure
(Customer Class == New Selection3)* New Selection1(Customer Class == New Selection4)* New Selection1(Customer Class == New Selection1)* New Selection2+Customer Class == New Selection2)* New Selection2
Hope it helps
Gabor
ps: experts maybe suggest easier way...

Issue in query panel LOV order by

Hi All,
I am using Jdev 11.1.1.6 version and Weblogic 10.3.6 version. I am facing an issue which is explained below. I have a screen with query panel and results table.
For Ex. Say i have Name in the results table and search paramater as well. Created Name with the help of a view object with search parameter as view criteria with Order by Name. Name search paramater is created as SelectOneChoice(LOV) . Also from my first page Add button can be clicked. On clicking the button new Name value can be added. On successfully saving the New value it is getting refreshed in the table results and displaying in the correct order. But in LOV the latest value is getting added at the Last. Rest of the values are Ordered by Name.
Is it possible to display the values in the correct order in LOV after new values are getting added?
I have tried the following.
     1. Refreshing the View Object with Search Criteria.
     2. Refreshing the LOV View Object.
     3. Refreshing the Whole Page.
4. Order by in View Accessor.
5. Refreshing the View Accessor.
Note: When i totally reload the page again then it is getting refelected correctly.
Thanks.
Regards,
Deena.

Maybe you can try to reset QueryModel, something like this:
QueryModel queryModel = queryComponent.getModel();
QueryDescriptor queryDescriptor = queryComponent.getValue();
queryModel.reset(queryDescriptor);
queryComponent.refresh(FacesContext.getCurrentInstance());
AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(queryComponent);Sorry, I don't have any more ideas :(
Dario

Goods Issue - SQL Query will not sum

I have 3 Goods Issue documents with Document Total for each document 10,000 / 20,000 / 30,000 subsequently.
I want to make query so that it will display like below - where it shows BOTH each of 3 document value (10000/2000/30000) AND the sum of the 3 documents (60000) like below.
Doc 1 - 10,000
Doc 2 - 20,000
Doc 3 - 30,000
Total = 60,000
In addition, I would like the ability to choose date range. Basically, something like
SELECT Document_Total
FROM Goods_Issue table
WHERE the_document_date is between 1-SEP-2011 and 31-SEP-2011
AND the_reference_is _________________
I have tried many SQL queries, but it displayed either:
Doc 1 - 10,000
Doc 2 - 20,000
Doc 3 - 30,000
OR
Total = 60,000
Please help.

@Hendry Wijaya @GordonDu @malhaar
Thanks for helps. The SQL query you provided solved 99% of the problem. I just need to make a tweak on the SQL so that it could display the total on the footer. See screenshot below - I uploaded the pics at imageshack as I don't find a way to attach pics in here.
[See here - Total_at_Footer|http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p213/whitesnowbear/AAAA/Untitled-2.jpg]
Thanks a bunch.

Characteristic issue in Query

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for