ChaRM Critical Object Check

Hello sifus,
I am configuring SAP SOLMAN 7.1 ChaRM and face issue with Critical Object Check functionality.
When i test to approve the transport containing the critical object in ChaRM the message appeared as successfully approved but when i checked
it was not as the critical sign still in red color instead of green and it is not allowed me to release the transport request from ChaRM.
Does anyone experience the same issue? and what would be the solution.

hi,
what is your sp release.
there are N number of notes released for CSOL inconsistency, have you checked, check also SAP note 1895691,
Thanks
Jansi

Similar Messages

Approve critical objects in transport requests (ChaRM)

Hi folks!
When trying to create transport of copies from within a Change Document (status 'to be tested') the system checks for critical objects in transport requests and prompts a warning that critical objects are to be approved.
I do not want the Change Manager to approve every transport request containing critical objects. I would more likely use this feature as information for the Developer so he is aware of working on critical objects. The Developer should be able to make the approval.
What I found out: only the user whos Business Partner is assigned to Partner Function 'Change Manager" is allowed to make the approval.
More detailed it seems to be Partner Function of type "0008 responsible person"
I tried changing Partner Function Developer from "0016 service group" to "0008 responsible person" but the system won't let me have two Partner Functions of that type in one Change Document.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
/cheers

Hi,
For any user to approve the change req or change doc, he should have the authorization
In your case Developer has to approve means
1. Create a Action definition and maintain the processing parameters for the definition, select the partner fn as Developer
2. Create the customized status in your status profile and its corresponding Authorization code also.
3. Assign the Authorization code for Developer under teh authorization object B_USERSTAT
By this Developer wil get the authorization for approving the change doc for the particular status
If solves your query then mark the thread as answered
regards
Naveen

ChaRM: Cross object lock-error /warning

Hi Team,
I have confgured CSOL in Sol Man ChaRM. The CSOL is working fine. I have set the conflict scenario as "Cross-Project, Client Specific" in /TMWFLOW/CONFIG_SERVICES. And i have activated the project lock in the all the satellite systems (DEV, QA & PRD) in "TMW_CONTROL_PROJECT_LOCK".
When have stored the change in th first transport request & released to QA. I am trying to change the same object & trying to store in the second transport request. At that time i am getting the ERROR message that, the selected object been already locked by another transport request. So i could not store the second change in the second transport request.
My requirement is: Instead of having ERROR message, can i have the WARNING message, so that i can ignore warning message & store the change in the second transport request?
Request for your valuable input on this
Thanks Kumar

Hi
Check the link which i have given earlier about critical objects
My requirement is:
In Q, if two transports request available (ie.ready to import to P) for the same object, if i try to import the second transport request to production first instead of first transport request, warning message should appear.
note: First transport request released first in DEV. The second transport request released second from DEV.
thats what i said if you save the object you wil get a pop in dev system for the same but when you import there is nothing like that.NO MESSAGE WILL COME AT IMPORT TIME.
more over if you define that object say a REPORT of SE38 as a critical object then you need approval for releasing the same
BUT again once it is released you won't get any further approval or message.
Hope ur doubt clarified.
Regards
Prakhar

Hi....space critical objects in DB02

hi all,
i am findind sapce critical object in DB02.
even it have 13% free space. (87 % full).
tablespace.name is : PSAPCLUD.
object RFBLG
Freespace /KB. maximun 164,880
total 665.488
next extent /kb 327.680.
how to solve this problem...
Regards,
swathi

Hi Swati,
Please check the tablespace properties by using BRTOOLS utility. Check for Autoextent, is it enables or not?
The option for this is to add a new datafile in this tablespace.
You can do this by doing following steps:
Try to add the datafile, as the autoextension is off.
You can do this by the help of SAPDBA/BRTOOLS.
You would get the stuff related to BRTOOLS in hep.sap.com portal.
Just go thorugh this link
how to add a database table space, may be it would help you out a bit.
If you get error in starting the brtools, just check the environmental variables like ORACLE_SID, ORACLE_HOME etc.
The other option is to reorg the tablespace.
That can be achieved by using the Brtools utility also.
Thanks

Critical objects in transport requests

Hi,
I know that's possible to check transport requests and detect if they contain critical objects, previously mantained in table TMSTCRI. But my question is if it's possible to block requests that contain this objects and prevent an import in the production system, for example.
Regards,
Joan
Edited by: Joan Baptista Altadill Elías on Feb 10, 2009 4:15 PM

Ji Joan!
... but you can prevent the release of such a transport request in the source system by maintaining the table with cirtical objects and by setting parameter CHK_CRIOBJ_AT_EXPORT into your transport profile.
For more details look here http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/54/39d73add219573e10000000a11402f/content.htm
and here ....
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/60/e3fd03e36811d184810000e8a57770/content.htm
Hope this helps!
Regards,
volker

Critical object error in benefits

Hi,
I am getting critical object error when i try to enroll an employee. Anybody provide me solution to ovecome this prooblem.

Hi Anand,
I tried using dependent/beneficiary and RLPGR but it did not work. Would this not be used to control eligibility in the dependents/beneficiary tabs.
What the client wants is to control Employee eligibility to the plan. If spouse is not present then EE must not be eligible for spouse life plan. How would this be achieved through standard customizing without using PBEN0006 and ABAP coding.
Thanks
Sumeet
Edited by: SUMEET MEHTA on May 20, 2008 8:53 PM

Handling an critical object if it is down

Hi,
In our J2EE web application we have so many critical functionality which is handled by various component. Say if one of the critical object or the respective critical system is down. How we can serve the request and still get the response from those systems? How this can be handled technically through code? I know we can go for service virtualization and create a system which will emulate the behavior of critical object or system. But for that we need to use the respective tools which is quite costly. How the same can be handled using java code , whether we can create a clone of that critical object and still serve the request eventhough the origibal critical object is down or can we create a proxy of that critical object? How we can handle it in java through code? Please clarify.
Thanks.

800839 wrote:
But for that we need to use the respective tools which is quite costly.
This should be a simple calculation:
What are the costs for losing that critical resource (temorary)?
How much will a comercial solution be (eg. Oracle RAC or Failover)
How much will a self coded solution cost?
That is:
how much efford is to be made by your developer(s)?
how expensive is it to keep the only person knowing that solution in your company (eg for extensions or bugfixes)?
how much will it cost if this solution does not work when needed?
In the long run cheap solutions tent to be quite expensive...
bye
TPD

Create a dummy workbench and customizing object as critical object

Hi!
I am testing now the transport settings for critical objects.
what is the easiest way to create a dummy workbench and customizing object, assign them to transport request and try to transport?
(e.g. Work Bench object: LIMU, DOCU, "Documentation")
Thank you very much!
regards
Thom

I think i misinterpret my requirement.
I have various other applications looking into my metadirectory. There is integration between OIM and Metadirectory and we have to update the various priviledges (multi value data) in Meta Resource form for this so that from MetaDirectory they can flow to other systems. For that i was thinking of using dummy resource object for each resource (attached to Meta). To update the various priviledges (group names and other entitlements) in meta collectively , i think we attached the dummy resource to access policies and once the values will update in dummy resource process form we can update the Meta Process Form accordingly (though i am not sure with this part that how can i achieve this). Also can we define the multi value data field in process form. By default child table having lookup is multivalue field (may be its only my conception) can we add it in core process form?
Pardon me for confusion but i am really patch up between business and technical people requirement :(...
just a follow up i need a pre-populate kind of functionality managing by access policy but after the value pre-populate in dummy resource object process form how to update the value in other process form and update the target resource.
Edited by: user10781632 on Jun 19, 2009 7:05 AM

Error while creating ADD-ON in objects check list

Hi Experts,
While i am creating Add-on i got error like below in SSDC while checking in Objects list.
Help me for this .
Thanks
J Jana

Hi,
check below
Error while installation of Addon
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/search.jspa?threadID=&q=ExceptionfromHRESULT%3A0x8007000B%22windows+7&objID=f56&dateRange=all&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
Exception from HRESULT: 0xFFFFE4A0
Regards
Deepak Tyagi

Object Check on file date

Hi,
i noticed a problem with an object i just created, i do a check on a file
date, before an object must run.
i check on the file \windows\system32\wininet.dll, it is create on
01/21/2004,
The problem is that is have to check the date +1, (01/22/2004)
Is it a bug or ????
Greetings
Jan

Shaun,
tried version 4.00.1043 and 4.00.1057
both gave the sane problem
Jan
"Shaun Pond" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
> Jan,
>
> what version of the agent please? the agent version is found by going
> to add/remove programs, ZENWorks Management Agent, and clicking on
> Support Information
>
> --
>
> Shaun Pond
> Novell Support Connection SysOp
>

ChaRM - Authorization Object to show documents in CRM_DNO_MONITOR

Hi folks,
does anyone know which auth. object or other prerequisite is needed to show documents in transaction CRM_DNO_MONITOR?
To our needs the SAP ChaRM default roles do not fit. So I am building roles from scratch (basically).
Auth. trace via ST01 did not show anything relevant when executing tx: CRM_DNO_MONITOR.
Sol Man 7.0, ST400-0017, BBPCRM500-0012
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Christian Kaunzner on Mar 9, 2009 10:28 AM

Hi,
I would still recommend to use SAP Standard roles as backbone and build on with your custom roles. Make a copy of standard roles. Creating from scratch would again have the same auth. objects that are available in standard roles.
>
Christian Kaunzner wrote:
> To our needs the SAP ChaRM default roles do not fit. So I am building roles from scratch (basically).
Can you let us know, how you want your roles to be defined?
Feel free to revert back.
-=-Ragu

ChaRM config - system check error

Hi All ,
I am working with the basis team to move forward with ChaRM - Solution Manager. We have a two system landscape with Development (DSM) and Production (PSM) (domain is set up as DOMAIN_DSM - exists in STMS).
We have most of the configuration / system landscapes done . When we do the ChaRM check ( solar_project_admin--> select project --> system lanscape --> Change request --> check) for a project that involves system (DBW - BW Development and a different transport domain DOMAIN_DBW , does not exist in STMS for DSM) it comes up with a system error saying - No domain for system DBW.
It seems to be checking the tabel TMSCSYS for systems DBW and when it does not find it there it complains. The question is do we have to set up these system in STMS in solution manager ?
any help would be appreciated . if you want to send me a doc please do it at amohamm at yahoo
thanks.
ali.

The problem was solved by activating the domain links for the multiple domain scenario . Please make sure that you carry out this activity - " You must perform all TMS activities in your satellite systems and not in your SAP Solution Manager system " .
Ali.

Space critical objects

Hi,
I have space sritical objects in DB02.
Can anybody advise me how i solve this problem?
Tablespace :PSAPES620
Object     :D010TAB
Type       :Table
Freespace/kb
Maximum       Total
1.056.640     1.653.824
Next extent/kb
8192
AutoExt.
Stat
red
Thanks

Hi
Try to add the datafile, as the autoextension is off.
You can do this by the help of SAPDBA/BRTOOLS.
You would get the stuff related to BRTOOLS in hep.sap.com portal.
Just go thorugh this link
how to add a database table space, may be it would help you out a bit.
If you get error in starting the brtools, just check the environmental variables like ORACLE_SID, ORACLE_HOME etc.
Thanks

Authorization Object - Checks

Hello Experts,
We make use of Authority checks in our applications which require User authorization .
For example Sales application makes use of Standard authorization object 'V_VBAK_VKO' .
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'V_VBAK_VKO'
       ID 'VKORG' FIELD VBAK-VKORG
       ID 'VTWEG' FIELD VBAK-VTWEG
       ID 'SPART' FIELD VBAK-SPART
       ID 'ACTVT' FIELD DA_ACTVT.
The above check is a combination of Business fields like Sales org(VBAK-VKORG) etc and Type of a Activity (DA_ACTVT)
for example '01' for create and '02' for change .
My requirement is to have pure activity based check .
Can we use the same check without Business fields and have only the Activity type . for example
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'ZOBJ'
       ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'.
Syntactically seems to correct .
Is this a correct usage ?
Thanks and Regards,
Ravish.

Hi,
Ya u can do do, but its not a good option atleast one field u should maintain in Authorization check.
e.g.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'ZOBJ'
ID 'VKORG' FIELD wa_VBAK-VKORG
ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'.
But there is no harm w/o field also u can create.
Regards
Arbind

Authority object check

Hello All,
I have created an authority check object for company code in SU21 and used the same in a program.Now i need to test it.How can i test it from my user id.I dont know for which all company codes do i have authorization.I want to know where to maintain this info.
Thanks,
Rakesh.

Hi Rakesh,
Get the authorization object assigned to user id by basis people and test if its working for you keeping the debugger in the program where it is entering into that condition or not.
Or you can also get few test user id's created and assign the authorization objects and test it accordingly.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Rashmi

ChaRM Critical Object Check

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for