ChaRM -possibility of userown SLMO-

Hi Groupies,
i would like to integrate my own "Maintanance Optimizer Transaction" -name is ZLMO- use to implement support package stacks. the transaction must be released by a change manager and a change request.
the flow is in the following way:
if the "change request" released it will be created a ZLMO by the System. I want to see this transaction of type zlmo in the sap-transaction "dswp"=>change management=>maintenance optimizer.
is it possible to customize this an if the answer "yes" how to do?
the problem is, that i would to integrate if the zlmo is finished that the change request will be also closed.
If i do that in the slmo is the problem, if you implement a support package stack, your own created setting could be overwritten by sap.
nico
Edited by: Nico Effenberger on Aug 8, 2008 8:18 AM

Is answered

Similar Messages

ChaRM - possible to have 2 different system landscapes in one project?

Hi,
can anyone tell me if it is possible to have 2 different system landscapes in one project. One landscape for developing and testing the Change Requests and another one for developing and testing the Bugfixes.
Thanks,
Martin

As Rick, mentions, there's no default way.
Having said that, there's nothing stopping you from doing it yourself. You can add a kind of language selector to the layout and set that for every html5 output. With some JavaScript, you can have the user switch between your outputs. It would look like content categories, but you'll have build it yourself.

CHaRM 2 system landscape possible??

Hi Solman experts,
I have a question. Is CHaRM possible in a 2 system landscape without creating extra clients? For example:
BWDEV100 -
>DWPRD100
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ricky

Hi Avinash,
But in TMS do you create one delivery transport route from dev100 to prod100 or do you create a consolidation route to prod100. Usually in a three system landscap you create 2 consolidation routes to the test system one with a transport layer that you created and one with the sap transport layer and then one delivery route to the production system.
Could you please explain what kind of transport route you create?
Thanks in advance.

CHaRM-Is that possible to create multiple Transport Request in UC

HI Gurus,
Quick question on ur.gent correction using Solution Manager CHaRM in EHP1. Is it possible to create multiple transport request(TR) for single ur.gent correction (UC). DO NOT confuse with transport task.
For example, after I created transport request and developer start working and release the task, realised to add another transport request for same UC. When I tried, it did not create any TR but checked the message found that
Schedule Manager: Monitor
Job Status: Processing completed, but with warnings
Program Name: /TMWFLOW/SCMA_TRORDER_CREATE
Action to be checked: Ur.gent Correction: Create Transport Request
There is already an open request, XXXXXXXXXX, for this project
So only way I can do that I released the TR and able to create another TR.
May be wondering why I need to create another TR, why not create TASK and work on that.
But this is the requirement at our company.
I will appreciate the effort and time to provide me the solution of this.
Thanks
Ava

Hi Ragu,
That's really quick turn around. Unfortunately not able to found whatever you mentioned in your message. Here is detail,
I navigate to Actions - Depending on Status, found the entry as
Trans. Type     StatProf         UserStatus     Seq     Action in SAP Change Manager
SDHF             SDHFHEAD   E0002            10       CREATE_HF
SDHF             SDHFHEAD   E0002            20       CREATE_REQ
SDHF             SDHFHEAD   E0002            30       SAVE_PARTNER
SDHF             SDHFHEAD   E0002            40       SET BO LINKS
Where SDHF - Ur.gent Correction
           E0002 - In Development
           CREATE_HF -        Create an Instance in SAP Change Manager
           CREATE_REQ -     Create Transport Request with Task
           SAVE_PARTNER - Save Partners in Respective Partner Roles
           SET BO LINKS -     Sets Links to Business Objects
I don't see any OPEN_TR.
Any other place need to make change.
Thanks
Ava

ChaRM: Normal Change - Not possible to set "Successfully Tested" unless the Maint. Cycle is set to "In Development with Release"

Hello,
I'm doing some tests with ChaRM, Normal Change scenario.
As far as I know, the following steps would be the correct sequence (concerning development and test phases only):
1) Developers perform the correction in DEV and release their TASKS of the transport request
2) Developer Lead set the Normal Change document status to "to be tested"
3) In background, a Transport of Copies is created with all data previously stored in the original transport request. Then this ToC is transported into QAS
4) Change Manager set the Maintenance Cycle status to "Test"
5) Tester performs the test into QAS
6) Tester provides a valuable feedback and set Normal Change document status to "tested successfully"
According to the following SAP Portal article, it seems to be correct:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm71_sp10/helpdata/en/48/db938dceba518de10000000a42189c/frameset.htm
During my tests, however, I have noticed that it is just possible to go from step 5 to 6 if the Maintenance Cycle status is set to "In Development with Release" (go a step back in the Cycle). Otherwise, I get the following error messages:
Warning Message Details Status was reset by system
Warning Message Details Action RELEASE_ALL cannot be performed during this maintenance phase
Warning Message Next status cannot be set because some actions cannot be executed.
Once I have done the Cycle status change, then it is possible to move from 5 to 6 without errors and then the original transport request is transported into QAS too.
Question: Is this the correct behavior or am I missing customizing?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Daniel

Hello Vivek,
Thanks for your reply.
It is kinda weird the steps sequence, since the Tester needs to tell the Change Manager to move the cycle's status before approving the correction done in QAS (successfully tested).
Perhaps a new action between "to be tested" and "successfully tested" could exist, in order to request the CM to perform the cycle update.
But OK, that's how it is.
Regards,
Daniel

CHARM without any project assignment possible or not ????

Hi ,
can we create transaction request through solution manager having charm configured without assignment of any maintenance project.
i n details : i config. charm for managing all daily transaction request from it. for that i was created a Zabc maintenance project.
so now when ever any new developments come on service desk request it will call for change management request from their and
after approval developer will create a TR which by default comes under project Zabc for maintenance cycle M0000XX.
Now i want to get either multiple option to choose different projects or without project . can any one confirm is it possible to create any TR (Dev) without any project assignment or not. If yes please let me know.
Regards
Andrew.
Edited by: Andrew lee on Jul 9, 2009 9:32 AM

Maintenance Project are used for Maintenance on your "live" business scenarios, checked out from your solution.
Implementation, Template are used for implementing new functionallity, into a new solution, or additional to a solution.
Upgrade projects speak for themselves.
If you start with Maintenance/Implementation/Upgrade/Template projects, as soon as you activate ChaRM (option in SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN) your are supposed to create a Maintenance Cycle. In relation to the type of project a certain tasklist is created, and thus a maintenance/development cycle is created.
To those cycles the individual, change documents are "attached" to get a release kind of working.
So you must have any cycle, Maintenance or Development or Upgrade.
Kind regards.

Is it possible to transport requests to 2 QA clients with ChaRM?

Hi
If there are 2 QA clients and requests need to be tranported to both clients at the same time,
can SolMan ChaRM handle this?
Transport route is as follows.
DEV_______QA_______PRD
200___->__300___->_100
______--->__500
Anybody has experience?
My version is SolMan 7.0 SP16
Thank you

hello,
I have the same behaviour in my landscape. Only the systems in the main path is available in SDHF task list
I would say this is normal.
Why is this normal ?
Because the ur.gent correction is to be considered like an emergency process that doesn't superseed the normal maintenance but that complement it to have a faster change in place.
That means the ur.gent transport will follow the normal maintance process anyway
If you miss the ur.gent transport in the other QA client you may schedule the following task in your project tasklist
/TMWFLOW/SCMA_BTCH_SYNC_TEST or online
/TMWFLOW/SCMA_TRIMP_SYNC_TEST
This is not obvious how this is working and I am currently evaluating this solution in another thread
[Is it possible to transport requests to 2 QA clients with ChaRM?|Is it possible to transport requests to 2 QA clients with ChaRM?]
on your side you may also want to evaluate this tasks ?
br
Xavier

ChaRM: Automatically matching Change Manager to IBase Component possible?

Hello gurus,
I am just wondering is it possible to have Change Manager automatically selected by ChaRM according to the value of IBase Compnent?
Any insightful suggestions would be appreciated.
BR Li Li

hi
please refer the suggestion on [this|Re: ChaRM: automatic fill of the field value of Change Manager;
if anything ont clear get back me.
Jansi

ChaRM: 4-System-Landscape possible?

Hello,
regarding our system landscape we have no clue how ChaRM will handle following situation
DEV-System: Development-System were the developments should be done.
QAS-System: Test-System were the tests should be done.
FNC-System: nothing to do here, just for functional tests
PRD-System: Production System
Transport routes are DEV -> transport group which deliveres QAS and FNC, and from QAS -> PRD.
What needs to be done to set this up correctly for ChaRM (e.g.: SMSY-logical components)?
Thanks in advance.

Hi
You have two options:
1) assign FNC to task list: you can start the import to this system in the task list manually
2) or task list without FNC: you can schedule a job 'import all' at FNC or import manually via STMS
Confiiguration:
1) One log. component with D-Q-FNC-P (Q and FNC are of role target systems)
2) One log. component with D-Q-P
regards
Andy

ChaRM - Mainenance Cycle in two system landscape - possible?

Hi Experts,
we are trying to create a maintenace cycle with two systems.
We have a system defined as "Evaluation System" and the second is defined as "Production System".
Generally Question
Is it possible to create a maintenace cycle for a two-system-scenario?
Specific Question - Erorrs/Warnings
While checking the project we got several errors/problems:
1 Differences between BC Set SOLMAN40_CHARM_BASICFUNC_001 and database
2 Differences between BC Set SOLMAN40_SDESK_BASICFUNC_000 and database
3 No consolidation system found for EID-800 (project Z_CRM_T)
4 No track for project Z_CRM_T with log. system EID/800
5 Message from function module /TMWFLOW/CHECK_PRJ_CONS: No export system for CBI-001
CTS
The transport system is configured correct - Check in STMS is OK
Question:
The comparison checks seem to be OK - is it necessary to reactivate the BC Sets?
Kind regards
Tom

Hi,
the system role for your client/systems in the logical component is very important:
- The development system needs to be defined as a Source System.
- If you don't have a QA, leave all target systems empty. If there are one or more consolidation/integration/regression systems, assign them to system role Target System.
- Your production system uses system role Production System.
The defined Development client needs a client dependent (TMS parameter CTC=1) consolidation track to the QA, or in a 2 Tier landscape to the production system. In a 3 Tier landscape you need a delivery track from QAS client to your production client. But as you wrote, TMS has been set up already. I just would like to mention all steps....
Check that all RFC connections have been set up correctly. Especially the Trusted RFC. Don't forget the Trusted RFC to client 000 ot the TMs domain controller.
In tab Systems ( transaction code SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN => System Landscape ):
Make sure you see all clients of your logical component. If not hit button System Role Assignment and add your System role.
Then still in the same tab: Hit button Shipment Routes and make sure, you see the complete transport track and only this track here!
After correct setup of TMS, RFCs, logical components and assignment of LC to your project:
First perform a Refresh and a Check in transaction code SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN => System Landscape => Change Requests. Then please recreate the maintenance cycle (and task list).
Regards,
Holger

ChaRM: transports to several production systems possible?

Hello,
we are facing following situation and do not know how ChaRM is handling this system landscape:
1 DEV system
1 QAS system
3 PRD systems (regional)
As the IBase Component has to be one PRD system, how can this be done, that all 3 PRD systems will be delivered at the same time?
Thanks in advance!

Hi John,
Refer to below URL, will provide more information.
https://websmp110.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700002931432006E.sim
/people/federico.babelis2/blog/2006/04/14/service-desk-configuration-guide-for-dummies
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/29884 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
https://websmp201.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000872582009E/index.htm
https://websmp201.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000872612009E/index.htm
http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700000293582009E.PDF
Cheers
Deepanshu

Is transport possible w/o implementing Solman Charm

Is transport in satellite system can be managed by solman w/o implementing Solman Charm? If so then how..it can be activated. Thanks in advance for your help.

Hello Dhananjay,
Are you refering to TMS, started with transaction STMS?
That is actually Basis.
However what you might be looking for is CTS+ (Change and Transport System) that can be intergrated with ChaRM, but doesn't need to be.
HEre is a link to best practices for implementing CTS+: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10456aac-44f7-2a10-1fbe-8b7bcd7bcd58?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
And here is a link to configuring CTS+ in Solution Manager : /people/dolores.correa/blog/2009/06/05/cts-configuration-in-solution-manager-70-ehp1
Hope this helps you out.
Regards,
Paul

Is it possible to have different CHARM process for R/3 and CRM system

Hi all,
I am currentlu workin on CHARM implementation and we have successfully gone live for R/3 System now we need to implement CHARM for CRM system. The Customer is asking to define a new Change request and new Urgent correction for CRM system as there is different approval procedure for CRM when compared to R/3 Now i want to know whether we can have a different CHARM process for CRM system alone, kindly give ur valuable inputs as it is very urgent.
Thanks in advance
Raju

Once the pricing procedure ia assigned to sales order, it is automatically copied into Invoice through Copy controls. You never assign pricing procedure to billing document. it is automatically copied.
Regards
AK

CHARM during implementation phase possible?

Hi Gurus
I would like to know the constraints of implementing CHARM during the implementation phase of the project.
I am aware that, charm functionality is best suitable for post go live change tracking tool and it is not recommended during the implementation phase. But I would like to know the reasons behind not recommending CHARM during implementation phase.
Please provide your valuable inputs.
Thanks.

Hi,
The following may not be the detailed reasons behind not recommending CHARM during implementation phase.
Implementation Project u2013 A project to implement SAP solution as a part of regular implementation or a roll out. This is considered for single-site implementations. Predefined scenarios can be selected from template projects.
Change Request Management (ChaRM) is an SAP tool to manage all those activities performed between the design of a change and the final promotion to a productive system
ChaRM can:
o Improve efficiency and transparency of change management processes
o Minimize business disruptions
o Store documentation of implemented changes
o Track and monitor changes
o Improve audit process
o Reduce risk of correction and project failures
ChaRM benefits are:
o Allow the Organization to control and manage changes in the SAP system effectively
o Guarantee that any change to the SAP system follows the standard process flow and procedures with mandatory controls and documented steps
o Effectively adheres to requirements for SOX compliance
Please also go through [this|http://www.sap.com/community/webcast/2009_06_worldtour_fr/2009_06_Worldtour_SOL1_SAP_fr.pdf] document.
Hope it helps.
Cheers,
Satish

Creation of new task list in CharM not possible

Hello!
I am using SOLMAN 4.0 (SP13 with the newest SP) and the problem to create the task list in Tcode: SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN --> System Landscape --> Change requests --"Create task list".
The following error occurs:
The project is not released. Hence cycle can not be created.
/TMWFLOW/CONFIG_UI017
How to solve this problem?
Any helpful information will be appreciated.
Thank you very much!
regards
Thom

Hi!
Yes, the problem was wrong configuration of systems.
Please try the following:
- your systems in system landscape have the right roles
- your TMS configuration is mandant dependent
- you have delivery as well consolidation routes
You can also run the check for the consistency...
You can write back, if the problem still exist...
regards
Thom

ChaRM -possibility of userown SLMO-

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for