Charm Retrofit Test in SM 7.1

When in 'To be Tested' state, 'Confirm Successful Testing', it prompts the following warning message, and status remains in 'To be Tested state.
1) Status was reset by system
2) No import into test system has taken place
3) Transport request is not flagged for import into production
Please suggest the Correct note or Steps to solve this errors

Hi,
Can you tell us if your transport imported with error in QAS system?
If yes,then in SCMA you can click on  'Correct import(repair flag)' button. It will give you the list of transports that went in error for all (*) users in QAS or PRD systems. Then you can select the transports one by one and click 'error corrected' button.
After this you can try again to change the status of CD to 'Successfully Tested'.
If No,please check the job log of collector job SM:TMWFLOW_CMSSYSCOL and see if it is running fine.
The production import queue doesn't get updated with QAS transports due to failure of mentioned job,so when you are scheduling import job it may not be getting any transport to import.
Also,  if you have 5 system landscape and you are moving the changes to QAS system of N+1 landscape, and because of ChaRM configuration, changes are not yet allowed to go in import queue of N landscape ,then we get such warnings.
Hope this helps.

Similar Messages

  • Using ChaRM Retrofit?

    Greetings, Solution Manager experts.
    My company is considering implementing an N + 1 ERP environment: 1 stream for maintenance, and 1 for project work.
    At this time, I am trying to assess if ChaRM Retrofit is being widely used in the industry, and what benefits and problems companies have seen with it. From what I can tell, there is not much documentation available on this topic.
    Are you using ChaRM Retrofit in an N + 1 SAP landscape?
    If so, has your company see a benefit to using this product?
    Can you offer any tips or watchouts to implementation?
    Thanks in advance for your help.

    Hi,
    Here are the information i collected about his topic. (hard to find information about that) :
    Prerequisites :
    A retrofit system must exist in the Maintenance Project (role type : Post Processing system). It should be a development system of an other project, for exemple an implementation project.
    The task list of the maintenance project will now have two new tasks :
    --> general tasks --> Assign Post Processing system to development system
    --> Track section --> Post Processing --> retrofit systems --> start retrofit
    I wish i could give clues for further research
    Regards

  • ChaRM and test management in implementation projects

    Hi
    I am doing implementation projects in solution manager. i have activated charm in the project so as to transport all the changes related to the project with the project lifecycle.
    I have got confusions regarding CHarm and Test MAnagement.. when we activated CHaRM the tester can logon to the system and perform testing and pass the Change Document to the next phase.
    What is the standard flow when both CHaRM and TEst Management for a project exists??
    Thanks

    Please can someone tell me how to use TEST MANAGEMENT and ChaRM for Implementation Project together??
    Edited by: Hasan Sidra on Jan 2, 2012 11:11 AM
    Edited by: Hasan Sidra on Jan 2, 2012 11:11 AM

  • ChaRM:Retrofit system level

    Hi Team,
    I am implementing retrofit functionality in ChaRM. Currently i am using Sol Man EHP1 ST Level: SAPKITL433. I am working with ECC landscape (ECC 5.) to test retrofit functionality (DEV,QA,PRD & Retrofit). What is the software component level required in the ECC systems to implement retrofit?
    Regards
    PSK

    According with note 1040612, you can use this function with the following SAP_BASIS releases.
         SAP_BASIS
              SAP Basis component
                                                   710          - 710
                                                   700          - 700
                                                   610          - 640
                                                   46A          - 46D
    Check this note too
    1066123

  • ChaRM:Retrofit:TMS set-up

    Hi team,
    In STMS, How to set-up transport path for retrofit client? I have already set-up transport path for DEV, QA and PRD to activate standard ChaRM. Is the existing transport path to be modified to include retrofit client?
    Note: I am working with ECC sandbox to test retrofit (within ECC sandbox system, i am creating four clients DEV,QA, PRD & RETROFIT)
    Thank you
    PSK

    hi
    chk this link
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_smehp1/helpdata/en/a3/0aae435a1342e8a56998d83a797161/content.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_smehp1/helpdata/en/a3/0aae435a1342e8a56998d83a797161/content.htm]
    jansi

  • Integration of Charm and test work bench or customizing

    Hello,
    Solution Manager allows one to define the business processes. One can then define test cases for these business processes. Then one can use the test workbench to do the testing.
    Is there any way to link the test workbench with Charm?
    Are there any such plans for such integration?
    Customizing can also be done from the business process definitions in a project. Are there any way that charm can be integrated to make changes in this way?
    Regards,
    Avrohom Weissman

    This is very far from the type of integration I expect to see. Proper incident management means when a problem occurs and incident is logged into the sap service desk. If this incident requires a change it should be forwarded to the CHange Reqest Management (CHaRM). From there it should have a business impact analysis, then a system or architecture review, only then if it is approved should development be started, after the development, it goes into QA for testing. Since the business process is defined in the solman and there are test cases for this business process. It makes sense that one can use the test workbench to verify the business process, and document the testing. If there is a problem with the testing and it needs to go back to development, it should be connected to the same incident logged initially. There should not be a second problem logged. It is still part of the same incident and should be managed as such.
    This question exists also for a maintenance project. Once I have an operational system and all the business process defined in the project and a change arrives into ChaRM, why canu2019t the change be done in the project like and implementation?
    How can one find out the direction of this product? Does SAP have any plans to develop solman into an integrated tool or will it remain a bunch of simple tools that co-exist on the same server?

  • ChaRM: extended test approach

    Hi!
    We would like to extend the ChaRM test function as follows:
    the appropriate Developer should have the possibility to log on on QAS-system and execute the test.
    This should be done before the UC/NC has been released. 
    Has some one any idea how to implement this approach?
    (Customizing, definition of new status of UC/NC)
    Any helpful information will be very appreciated!
    Holger Thomasson

    If the Extended test says your drive is bad, believe it. My brother has a G5 iMac. Everything passed Extended tests when new. After a few months strange things started happening to the file system (e.g files randomly disappearing). Disk Utility showed no errors. S.M.A.R.T. verified. Hardware Quick Test passed. Hardware Extended Test showed bad mass storage. Apple suggested Erase with zero option. Still failed Extended Test. When I called them back and gave they error codes from Extended Tests they sent a new drive (Maxtor @%)GB, same as original). It passed Extended Tests and there have been no problems since then.
    When you get a new computer it is a good idea to run the Hardware Extended tests, even if everything seems to be working. Then you will know that if it does show an error later, something has gone bad, and it is not just normal behaviour of the test program.

  • Charm and Test workbench

    We are using charm and would like it to link together with the test
    workbench? In this way we will be able to use are test cases for the
    defined processes in the testing in charm.
    Does SAP have plans to link test workbench to charm?

    Hi Yosh,
    I know a very famous pharma company where ChaRM has been implemented successfully. Due to some restrictions, I am not disclosing the name.
    Regards,
    Sneha.

  • Cross System Object Lock with ChaRM Retrofit

    Hi-
    I need to know if there is the ability to have a cross system object lock while utiliziing Retrofit within ChaRM. For example I am working with an N, N1 landscape. When I release a transport request in N I need the object to be locked in the N, and N1 (after retrofit) landscapes.
    Will this be supported with both Workbench and Customizing requests?

    I dont believe this is possible at the moment. As you must be already aware, that SAP releases the locks from the objects as soon as the transport request is released from the Development System. Unless, this locking mechanism is extended to various systems first (DEV and QAS) and later to parallel landscapes (eg:- Project landscapes) it would be difficult to bring in this feature.
    Rgds,
    Abhijeet Bhagat

  • ChaRM and Test Workbench Successful Implementations

    Where has ChaRM and/or Test Workbench has been successfully implemented within one of the following industries:
    Medical Devices
    Healthcare
    Pharma
    THANKS MUCH!

    Hi Yosh,
    I know a very famous pharma company where ChaRM has been implemented successfully. Due to some restrictions, I am not disclosing the name.
    Regards,
    Sneha.

  • ChaRM: SDTM Test Message, no actions available

    Hello Solution Manager Gurus, in our system, when a Test message is created it can be set to In Process, but when it is In Process there are no actions available.
    This is the contents of the action determination log:
    Determination started
    Application: CRM_ORDER  action profile: SDTM_ACTIONS
    Application class: CL_DOC_CRM_ORDER_H  GUID: DF014BC822CBE4F1AC2A0014227724B9
    Action ON_CREATE_TM (During Creation)
    1 conditions for action ON_CREATE_TM were read
    Condition 1 is not fulfilled
    Determination did not deliver any action templates
    Action Merging: One Unprocessed Action with Equality Check
    Action CHECK_STATUS_TM (Checks Consistency)
    1 conditions for action CHECK_STATUS_TM were read
    Condition 1 returns an action template
    Number of action templates from the determination: 1
    Action CHECK_STATUS_TM type MET was generated and added
    Action Merging: One Unprocessed Action with Equality Check
    An identical action has been determined again
    Action CHECK_STATUS_TM of type MET is kept
    Action CHECK_STATUS_AGAIN_TM (Check Test Message Again)
    1 conditions for action CHECK_STATUS_AGAIN_TM were read
    Condition 1 is not fulfilled
    Determination did not deliver any action templates
    Action Merging: One Unprocessed Action with Equality Check
    Action LOGON_TM (Logon to System)
    1 conditions for action LOGON_TM were read
    Condition 1 is not fulfilled
    Determination did not deliver any action templates
    Action Merging: One Unprocessed Action with Equality Check
    Action IN_PROCESS_TM (Take "In Process")
    1 conditions for action IN_PROCESS_TM were read
    Condition 1 is not fulfilled
    Determination did not deliver any action templates
    Action Merging: One Unprocessed Action with Equality Check
    Action TO_RETEST_TM (Pass to "Retest")
    1 conditions for action TO_RETEST_TM were read
    Condition 1 is not fulfilled
    Determination did not deliver any action templates
    Action Merging: One Unprocessed Action with Equality Check
    Action TESTED_AND_OK_TM (Confirm Correction)
    1 conditions for action TESTED_AND_OK_TM were read
    Condition 1 is not fulfilled
    Determination did not deliver any action templates
    Action Merging: One Unprocessed Action with Equality Check
    Action WITHDRAW_TM (Cancel Test Message)
    0 conditions for action WITHDRAW_TM were read
    Determination did not deliver any action templates
    Action Merging: One Unprocessed Action with Equality Check
    Balance follows
    Edited by: Richard Bailey on Jan 14, 2010 4:32 PM

    Here is the balance of the log:
    Action TESTED_AND_NOT_OK_TM (Reset "In Process")
    1 conditions for action TESTED_AND_NOT_OK_TM were read
    Condition 1 is not fulfilled
    Determination did not deliver any action templates
    Action Merging: One Unprocessed Action with Equality Check
    Action RELEASE_REQUEST_TM (Release Transport Requests)
    1 conditions for action RELEASE_REQUEST_TM were read
    Condition 1 is not fulfilled
    Determination did not deliver any action templates
    Action Merging: One Unprocessed Action with Equality Check
    Action CREATE_REQUEST_TM (Create Transport Request)
    1 conditions for action CREATE_REQUEST_TM were read
    Condition 1 is not fulfilled
    Determination did not deliver any action templates
    Action Merging: One Unprocessed Action with Equality Check
    Action CREATE_TASK_TM (Create Task)
    1 conditions for action CREATE_TASK_TM were read
    Condition 1 is not fulfilled
    Determination did not deliver any action templates
    Action Merging: One Unprocessed Action with Equality Check
    Action NAVIGATE_TO_TASKLIST_TM (Go to Task Plan)
    1 conditions for action NAVIGATE_TO_TASKLIST_TM were read
    Condition 1 is not fulfilled
    Determination did not deliver any action templates
    Action Merging: One Unprocessed Action with Equality Check

  • ChaRM: Retrofit

    Hi Retrofit,
    The new functioanlity "Retrofit" is available in Sol Man EHP1. What is retrofit functioanlity? How is the benefit of this functioanlity?
    Your input will be very much appreciated
    Thnaks
    Kumar

    Hi Khalil,
    Request for your input to set up the logical component for retrofit functionality.
    I am considering two possible ways to implement retrofit.
    1. Create one logical component LC1 and the follwoing systems in the logical component:
    LC1: SJ1:100 (System Role: DEV), SJ1:200 (System Role:QA), SJ1:300(System Role:PRD), SJ1:400 (System Role: Post Processing).
    Note: Post Processing system is a retrofit system.
    2. Create two logical componets like LC1 & LC2 with the folowing systems in the logical component
    LC1: SJ1:100 (System Role: DEV), SJ1:200 (System Role:QA), SJ1:300(System Role:PRD), SJ1:400 (System Role: Post Processing).
    LC2: SJI:400 (System Role: DEV), SJ1:200 (System Role:QA), SJ1:300(System Role:PRD).
    Which option will be best to go for retrofit functionality.
    Note: Post Processing system is a retrofit system. All the clients are within the same system.
    Thanks for the input
    Kumar

  • Not able to create a Task List for Charm Retrofit

    Hi All,
    we are trying to implement retrofit for our client. Created two projects one for implementation and one id maintenance and defined the system landscape for both.
    I have checked the RFC connection for all the systems involved and all works fine. IMG projects are created successfully for both.
    Problem comes when we are creating a maintanance cycle or task list after activating the change request management. We always get a logon screen after giving the name of task list and press ok. First we thought it could be the trusted RFC issue but trusted RFC for the current user is working fine.
    Could anyone know what is the problem and if you faced the same issue pls share your experience what all did you try to rectify it.
    Thanks
    Tripti

    Hi,
    BC sets are active. I have already checked, it ended up in warning but its general we can avoid it. One thing which we found out was thi error when I am checking the application log for the project
    System cancel RFC destination SM_GTDCLNT020_TMW, Call TMW_SET_PROJECT_SWITCHES: No authorization to change file /usr/sap/gttrans/a ctlog/GTDZP000XX.GTD
    I don't understand what exactly is this error about but informed the authorization team regarding this.
    Any idea?
    Thanks,
    Tripti

  • Can Co-Exist two CHARM setups for managing an Unique Landscape?

    Hi Guys
    We are actually migrating and Upgrading an existing Solution Manager 7.01 to 7.1
    Since we are performing tests on this Sandbox system, we would like to replicate CHARM configuration and execute full integration tests against managed systems.
    There is the actual Productive Solution Manager (SSM), which manages an BW Landscape and a ERP Landscape
    If we configure CHARM this Sandbox Solution Manager upgraded to 7.1 (SMT), to manage the same actual BW and ERP Landscape, the configuration would be affected on the original Systems?
    In other words, Can we have two CHARM Clients (Test and Productive) to manage BW and ERP Landscape without affecting each other configuration
    On the Sandbox CHARM, we only want to test configuration and perform a Change Request Cycle only for testing.
    Any comments or suggestions would be much appreciated.
    Regards!

    Hi Martin,
    Your development solman might not be connected to erp dev qa and prod so you can just create 3 clients within solman to do this or
    take a erp sandbox and create 3 clients within it having roles of Dev Qa and Prd like in below blogs
    How To - Configure ChaRM on Single Managed System with multiple client for PoC(Part1)
    How To - Configure ChaRM on Single Managed System with multiple client for PoC(Part2)
    hope above helps
    Thanks
    Prakhar

  • Is it Possible to Create Custom Report in SOLMAN

    Hi Experts,
                         I am new to SOLMAN. I have one question. Is it Possible to create our own custom Reports in SOLMAN. If possible
    tell me the variuos types of reports and how we can create.

    Hi
    SAP Solution Manager can be used for entire ALM so you need to clearly specify which area and what report you are talking about
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/alm-getting-started
    General transaction code for reporting is
    SOLAR_EVAL
    it helps you to build the entire project report phase wise or for service desk or for charms or test management etc
    check if that you are looking for.
    regards
    Prakhar

Maybe you are looking for