ChaRM - Support for 46C as Transport Domain Controller

Good day.
We are currently testing ChaRM with the Transport Domain Controller being on a 46C box. We are getting the following error when trying to create a Task List:
Function module "TMW_DISPLAY_TRANSPORT_ROUTES" not found.
Is the use of a TDC on 46C supported with ChaRM?
Thanks,
Charles.

Hey Charles,
CHARM can only be implemented on satellite Systems with SAP Version 4.6 C onwards and above...
However, even then domain controller needs to be on 4.7.. i.e it requires WAS 620 aplication server...
Therefore we can conclude that CHARM cannot be implemented with the satellite system you had mentioned above..
Please Reward for useful points...
Regards,
Anand

Similar Messages

  • Transport Domain Controller delete

    Hello,
    I have created a new BI dev system and need to set up the transport connectionns.
    I have deleted the TMS for the old BI dev and now try to set it up for the new BI dev.. I assume i first have to delete the setting that the old system is the Transport Domain Controller. How do I do this?
    Thanks,
    F C

    Hi F C,
    you can delete the TMS configuration
    goto>STMS(T-code)>system overview>Extras>Delete TMS Configuration
    regards,
    kanthi

  • Include a system in two different Transport Domain Controller

    Hi folks,
    I s it possible to configure a system in two different transport Domain Controller?
    The two domain controllers will be in the same /usr/sap/trans file system.
    thanks,
    Má

    Hello Má
    Firstly to include system in the transport domain you need to have systems sharing common transport directory. Which you confirmed is the case.
    Now when you try to change the Transport Domain of the system to make it part of another system it will overwrite current configuration.
    Hence you wont be able to make one system part of two Domains.
    There is no workaround available best of my infomation.
    Regards
    DG

  • Does Oracle 10G R2 support installation on Windows 2003 Domain Controller?

    Does Oracle 10g R2 support installation on Windows 2003 Domain Controller? I remember that 10g R1 had issues with the DC? Is it still the case. Does it work now?
    Any help is appreciated.
    Regards,
    Raghav

    We have Oracle 10g R2 running on a Windows 2003 domain controller. It was not a domain controller when Oracle was installed. The domain was created after installation. (I don't recommend that procedure. I spent a long day fixing the installation after they configured the domain.) If Oracle is unhappy with being on a domain controller, it has not shown it yet.

  • Support for Aironet 1040 and 2504 Controller

    Are there any plans to provide support for Aironet 1040 series access points and the 2504 controller?  I see where the 1140 series is supported and thought the 1040 would follow.  If there are no immediate plans for full support, will OnPlus at least recognize the devices and alert if they go down, which is my main concern?

    Hi Anthony,
    I know we do have planned support for the 1040 in the future but I do not have dates at this time. Regarding a device going down, an ICMP host monitor can be configured on any device in OnPlus.
    For more information, watch this quick video, on setting up monitors:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brCc2JB-gfc&feature=plcp
    Thanks,
    The OnPlus Team

  • ACS 4.1 support with Windows Server 2012 Domain controller

    I am upgrading my Domain Controller / Active Directory from Windows Server 2003 to Windows Server 2012.
    In my environment, I am using Cisco ACS 4.1 which is integrated with Windows Server 2003 Active Directory.
    Will ACS4.1 will work fine with my new domain controller (Windows server 2012) or I need to upgrade my ACS too?
    Regards,
    Junaid

    Junaid,
    ACS 4.x code doesn't even support Windows 2008 R2. Your best bet is to migrate the ACS from 4.x to ACS 5.4 Patch 2 or stay with windows 2003 or 2008 (Non-R2).
    ACS 5.4 patch 2 supports Windows 2012 AD.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5-4/release/notes/acs_54_rn.html
    Regards,
    Jatin
    **Do rate helpful posts**

  • Support for Appletalk on the 526 controller (and others to)

    I have noticed that from version 4.2x the controller does not seem to pass appletalk traffic through to the wireless clients.
    I started to look around for some information but there are quite few resources for the 526. So i started to read the release notes and read the release notes for the 2100 controller and noticed that it doesn't support appletalk at all.
    My question is simple, is it common for cisco's wireless products to not support appletalk? Is this maybe an step on the roadmap to get rid of appletalk completely =)

    Appletalk bridging is supported in 4400, WiSM, or 3750G. If you insist to use 526, you need to configure HREAP on the AP and HREAP local switching for the WLAN.

  • Windows Server 2012 as NTP Server for Windows Server 2008R2 Domain Controller

    We have one domain with 3 Windows Server 2008R2 DC's. Our Edge router is configured to get the time from the internet, and was our timesource for the PDC emulator. But lately we have migrated our major routers to Cisco IOS15, and now the timeservice on the
    PDCe is unable to fetch the time. This is a known bug, as you can read here:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/ja-JP/b16de048-8642-4799-b85a-ad092e17dd47/windows-server-2012-ntp-version-compatibility
    Now I've found out that Windows Server 2012 does sync with the router. That's our DirSync server, and is in the same VLAN as our DC's. So I thought: I'll set up the Windows Server 2012 as new timeserver, so our PDCe can sync with that server. (Compony
    policy is that DC's don't talk to the internet). Everything seems alright.
    I've set:
    w32tm /config /manualpeerlist:<IP of router>,0x8 /syncfromflags:manual
    w32tm /config /reliable:yes
    Changed the registry with:
    HKLM\SYSTEM\CC\SERVICES\W32TIME\TIMEPROVIDERS\NTPSERVER - Enabled:1
    HKLM\SYSTEM\CC\SERVICES\W32TIME\Config - AnnounceFlags:A
    And stopped and started the W32Time service. I can see that the Windows 2012 server is fetching the correct time, and checked with NBTSTAT -NA that it's listening on port 123.
    But our PDCe doesn't sync. (also changed the config so it has the 2012 server as timesource). Get the EventID 47:
    Time Provider NtpClient: No valid response has been received from manually configured peer <w2012server> after 8 attempts to contact it. This peer will be discarded as a time source and NtpClient will attempt to discover a new peer with this DNS
    name. The error was: The peer is unreachable.
    What more can I try?

    It only shows me the 3 DC's:
    DC04.domain.local *** PDC ***[[::1]:123]:
        ICMP: 0ms delay
        NTP: +0.0000000s offset from DC04.domain.local
            RefID: 'LOCL' [0x4C434F4C]
            Stratum: 1
    DC03.domain.local[10.x.x.x:123]:
        ICMP: 0ms delay
        NTP: -0.0097028s offset from DC04.domain.local
            RefID: DC04.domain.local [10.x.x.x]
            Stratum: 2
    DC05.domain.local[10.x.x.x:123]:
        ICMP: 0ms delay
        NTP: -0.0127883s offset from DC04.domain.local
            RefID: W8D-VW-DC04.domain.local [10.x.x.x]
            Stratum: 2
    Warning:
    Reverse name resolution is best effort. It may not be
    correct since RefID field in time packets differs across
    NTP implementations and may not be using IP addresses.

  • Adding Systems to Transport Domain Controller

    Hi,
    We got copy version of Production system in our test box, I have to configure TMS by deleting production systems , have to include test systems in TMS Systems Overview. What else I have to do to setup TMS in test box? have to update DOMAIN.PFL file ? if any one have step by step procedure with screen shots or any detail oss notes please tell me the links.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Srinivas

    Hi F C,
    you can delete the TMS configuration
    goto>STMS(T-code)>system overview>Extras>Delete TMS Configuration
    regards,
    kanthi

  • Exchange 2007 RTM support with Windows Server 2012 R2 Domain Controller

    Hi All,
    I have not found any TechNet Article which states about the Windows Server 2012 R2 Active Directory domain controller operating system support with Exchange 2007 RTM, can some one please let me know that does Exchange 2007 RTM supports Windows Server 2012
    R2 domain controller operating system, we are in the process of upgrading the domain controllers to 2012 R2 but not the forest and domain functional level to 2012 R2.
    thanks
    If answer is helpful, please hit the green arrow on the left, or mark as answer. Salahuddin | Blogs:http://salahuddinkhatri.wordpress.com | MCITP Microsoft Lync

    There are several likely reasons for this.  The most significant is that Exchange 2007 RTM is no longer supported (outside ot extended support, which is not going to include adding support for new operating systems): 
    http://support2.microsoft.com/lifecycle/default.aspx?LN=en-us&p1=10926
    You'll note from the following -
    http://technet.microsoft.com/library/ff728623(v=exchg.150).aspx - that only Exchange 2007 SP3 is currently supported in any environment.
    HTH ...

  • Limit Administrator Access to only OS Level functions on a Windows 2003 (and up) Domain Controller Server

    <p>I have read several articles such as:</p><p>1.&nbsp; <a href="http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/9c723f4a-51a7-4844-9dc6-0017355d694c/limited-administrative-on-domain-controller?forum=winserverDS">http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/9c723f4a-51a7-4844-9dc6-0017355d694c/limited-administrative-on-domain-controller?forum=winserverDS</a></p><p>2.&nbsp;
    Active_Directory_Delegation.doc</p><p>Consider that a domain controller, doing no other functions than domain based functions (ie no file server, printer or app server) - is managed in two parts:&nbsp; The OS-only level, to read log files,
    server health monitoring, install OS-level Micrsoft security patching and the second part being Domain management level - Users and Computers, Domains and Trusts, etc).</p><p>For a given domain controller server, an outsourced support&nbsp;group&nbsp;needs
    to be responsible for the OS-only level access - they need no access to the Domain management level functions so they can fufill contractual obligations (SLAs) for server uptime, patching etc.&nbsp; </p><p>For the same given domain controller
    server above, there is an internal (non-outsourced) support group that will perform all Domain management level functions only.&nbsp; They want to manage the Domain on the Domain Controller servers, want the Outsourcer to manage the VM and OS-related tasks,
    but DO NOT want them to be able to access and change information in Users and Computers, Domains and Trusts etc.&nbsp; </p><p>With that explaination, would putting the Outsourcer's AD-based account IDs in the Server Operators group alone be
    sufficient to allow OS-level management, like patching, reboots, etc but disallow access to Domain Management functionality (Users and Computers etc) - or does it need to be a combination of built in groups and delgated rights?</p><p>Please consider
    that I am seeking a technical solution here&nbsp;- do not respond with "either trust your Domain Administrators or keep your junior admins from the server" as that is not a viable solution.&nbsp; </p>
    Jason B. Allen

    Hi Jason,
    According to your description, you want to assign the OS-level management and Domain management rights to two groups separately, right?
    Based on my research, members of Server Operators group don’t have sufficient rights to install updates for Domain Controllers, you can refer to this article below:
    Default groups
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc756898(v=WS.10).aspx
    You can configure Allow non-administrators to receive update notifications group policy so that non-administrative users will be able to install all optional, recommended, and important updates content for which
    they received a notification, except some updates which contain User Interface, End User License Agreement and so on, which still require domain admin credentials.
    To enable non-administrator users the ability of logging onto and shutting down DCs,
    Allow logon locally and Shut down the System rights should be granted.
    In addition, reading logs and monitoring server performance rights are included on Performance Log Users and Performance Monitor Users groups.
    More information for you:
    Step 5: Configure Group Policy Settings for Automatic Updates
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn595129.aspx
    User Rights Assignment
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc780182(v=WS.10).aspx
    I hope this helps.
    Amy Wang

  • Weblogic on Unix, authenticating users/groups from NT domain controller

    Hi!
    Our weblogic 6.1 server will eventually run on a non-windows platform, but
    needs to authenticate users from a Windows NT 4.0 domain controller. What's
    the best solution to this?
    - What (inexpensive) LDAP-servers supports synchronization with a Windows
    domain controller?
    - Or am I missing out on other ways of doing this?
    jan henrik

    Yes. Other instrinsic jobs are failed too. Does this related to Job Dispatcher service? Thank you for your help.

  • Transport domain configuration error

    Hi,
    We have made a homogeneous system copy of our R/3 production system to create a test system.
    The copy has the same SID as the source system and is installed as a local system rather than a domain - this is a Windows environment. The source system is the domain controller for the transport domain.
    I have run SE06 in the copied system and am now trying to reconfigure STMS to set it up as a single system in it's own domain.
    However, when I go into t/action STMS I am prompted to join the production domain - which I didn't expect, so I select Other configuration and enter appropriate values there but am getting error:-
    Local TMS configuration is inconsistent in N3P
    Message number XT 123
    Can anybody advise how to resolve this?
    Regards
    Richard

    1. Did you follow changing SID name and post database copy steps at database level first?
    2. If you have done above, I hope you have deleted existing Transport configuration from SE06. If you haven't pls do.
    3. Then,  At transport domain controller, please remove this system ( if this system existed earlier)
    4. Now, try joining domain.
    It should work!
    K

  • Same transport domain. different transport directory, possible?

    Hi SAP folks,
    A quick query, I work on multiple systems within a single SAP transport domain. Recently we have requirements to move 2 non-ABAP systems to a different transport directory while keeping the rest intact.
    The reason for this is we are doing CTS+ for the 2 non-ABAP system and do not want to share the transport directories for the rest of the ABAP system.
    Please advise if this can be done and how?
    The following link for SAP suggested that it's possible but stop short of how to do it.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c4/6045377b52253de10000009b38f889/content.htm
    Anyone done similar setup? care to share?
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    Jansen

    Hi,
    You can do this very well. First you should remove the two systems that you wanted to configure for CTS+ from your existing transport domain. To do this, login to your existing transport domain controller and delete the systems you wanted to remove from transport domain.
    To perform this:
    STMS --> Overview -> Systems -> < choose the system u want to delete> -> SAP Systems -> Delete. Confirm the deletion and save and activate the changes made to ur configuration.
    And then add your Non-ABAP systems you wanted to configure for CTS+ using the domain controller you decided for CTS+.
    I hope this help you to perform your action.
    Best Regards,
    Vasanth Govindaraj

  • Why development system is considered as domain controller ???

    Hi ,
    SAP recommends Production system as domain controller .Resaon is PRD is secured and has more availability.
    But ,Most of the customer systems development system is set as Domail controller.
    My guess on this point is , Development system will get installed fisrt in landscape and while configuring the STMS we have to use this system as domain controller.Later this scenario is not changed.
    Please let me know why development system is set as domain controller. I have see most of the customer systems are having DEV as domain controller. That's why I would like to know about this point.
    Thanks in advance.
    Venkat

    Hi
    To be specific, few clients do it, thinking of failover case. If your PRD system fails for some reason, it would effect the whole transport system if it is the domain controller.
    While if they make DEV or QA as domain controller, this can be ruled out.
    Again for QA, since it is assumed to be a copy of PRD system, and regularly experiences System refresh with PRD data, which would result in QA downtime, regularly. Which again is undesirable for a working transport system.
    So, inspite of recommendation by SAP for PRD system as domain controller, client goes for DEV system as domain controller.
    Hope this clarifies your question.
    Regards
    Rahul

Maybe you are looking for