ChaRM with 4 system Landscape.

Hi,<br />
We are trying to implement ChaRM in a four system landscape <br />
<br />
AFD --&gt; AFQ --&gt; AFI --&gt; AFP<br />
<br />
defined logical components, project, created maintenance cycle. U'gent correction works fine.<br />
<br />
but for regular correction, we are able to create TRs release it, but not getting imported into AFQ and of course further steps are not happening. When the status is "Development Completed", we perform "Log on to system", this pops up with a dialogue with options<br />
<br />
AFQ           200<br />
AFI             100<br />
<br />
to logon to system.<br />
<br />
This is the only clue we got.   <br />
<br />
When we perform the actions, the status keeps changing and goes to status "Production". It doesn't obey the phases maintenance cycle as well, irrespective of the phases the status keeps changing and goes to status "Production"<br />
We are missing some minor thin's.<br />
<br />
Have we defined the system roles properly? IF not, how does the flow works perfectly fine with respect to U'gent correction.<br />
<br />
Please help.<br />
<br />
<br />
Regards,<br />
Ragu<br />
<br />

Hi Ragu,
I have a few questions here:
1. What normal correction type are you using - SDMI or SDMJ
2. What roles are assigned to the systems in Logical Components? I believe they are setup as Target Systems and thats why you get the pop-up with both systems when you execute 'Logon action' after 'Development Completed'
3. What is the STMS setup for this landscape?
4. Urgnt should behave properly coz it takes the shortest route to production. Can you check the tasklist of Urgnt and see if there are only 3 systems there?
Regards,
Kriti Bhalla

Similar Messages

  • 403 Error during communication with System Landscape Directory from RWB

    Hi,
    I've got a new install of PI (XI 7.0) SPS 10 and am getting an error whenever I try to access the SLD from RWB or Integration Builder.  The SLD is running on the same server as XI.
    I've been through the various config guides (strangely there doesnt seem to be one specifically for PI/XI 7.0),  to configure RFC destinations, checked users are not locked etc.
    I'm thinking it's probably a VA / Authorisations issue, but could use some ideas!
    Here's a few errors just for reference (and future people searching!)
    <i>
    Error during communication with System Landscape Directory: HTTP response code: 403 (Forbidden)
    Unable to read XI domain from the SLD. Monitoring cannot therefore be configured. Error message: com.sap.aii.rwb.exceptions.BuildLandscapeException: Error during communication with System Landscape Directory: HTTP response code: 403 (Forbidden)
    No System Landscape Directory exists. Unable to generate the landscape
    Unable to read software component versions from System Landscape Directory "my.server:51400" (have tried 8014 also)
    </i>
    Thanks,
    James.

    Hi,
    1) Activated all services
    2)Go to SU01 > type PIISUSER and reset the user's pw
    Check out this might be helpful
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/89/05793c05f0807be10000000a11405a/content.htm
    403 ERROR
    Check this note might help you 961880
    Regards
    Agasthuri Doss

  • Error during communication with System Landscape Directory: HTTP response c

    Dear all,
    I have redirected a SLD to our Q system. Everything in the Repository is working fine. What did I do:
    - Adjusted settings in SLDAPICUST
    - Adjusted SAPSLDAPI
    - Adjusted LCRSAPRFC
    - Adjusted the following values in the Exchange Profile:
    com.sap.aii.connect.cr.httpport
    com.sap.aii.connect.cr.name
    com.sap.aii.connect.landscape.httpport
    com.sap.aii.connect.landscape.name
    So, SLDCHECK works fine.
    The Repository sees the right SLD.
    However, in the Directory I cannot choose an Adapter Engine (leaves blank) in my comm. channel.
    Then I went to the RWB and got the following message:
    <b>Error during communication with System Landscape Directory: HTTP response code: 403 Forbidden</b>
    Where can I change something to make this work? Is this a user verification problem?
    Thanks in advance for your input.

    go through the notes :-
    #764176 Error in XI due to inconsistent SLD contents
    #720717 Reduce the number of System Landscape Directories
    Regards
       Kenny

  • ChaRM: 4-System-Landscape possible?

    Hello,
    regarding our system landscape we have no clue how ChaRM will handle following situation
    DEV-System: Development-System were the developments should be done.
    QAS-System: Test-System were the tests should be done.
    FNC-System: nothing to do here, just for functional tests
    PRD-System: Production System
    Transport routes are DEV -> transport group which deliveres QAS and FNC, and from QAS -> PRD.
    What needs to be done to set this up correctly for ChaRM (e.g.: SMSY-logical components)?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    You have two options:
    1) assign FNC to task list: you can start the import to this system in the task list manually
    2) or task list without FNC: you can schedule a job 'import all' at FNC or import manually via STMS
    Confiiguration:
    1) One log. component with D-Q-FNC-P (Q and FNC are of role target systems)
    2) One log. component with D-Q-P
    regards
    Andy

  • CHaRM 2 system landscape possible??

    Hi Solman experts,
    I have a question. Is CHaRM possible in a 2 system landscape without creating extra clients? For example:
    BWDEV100 -
    >DWPRD100
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ricky

    Hi Avinash,
    But in TMS do you create one delivery transport route from dev100 to prod100 or do you create a consolidation route to prod100. Usually in a three system landscap you create 2 consolidation routes to the test system one with a transport layer that you created and one with the sap transport layer and then one delivery route to the production system.
    Could you please explain what kind of transport route you create?
    Thanks in advance.

  • ChaRM  4-System landscape

    Hello,
    We have setup our landscape to have a Dev system which goes to two different QA systems, then from the QA systems into Production. Dev has 4 clients going into QA 1 and 2 clients going to QA2, There are then two productive clients, one for HR, One for FI.
    The Transport system has been setup and is working.
    Can ChaRM handle sending a transport to two systems for testing?
    How should the logical systems be set up?
    DEV - -> QA1 - - - - >PRD
            -- >QA2 - - -
    Regards,

    Hi Avrohom Weissman 
    We had same setup and this is what we did to come up with this issue.
    We have added the new client in the Transport Path of STMS as required. We have used  standard Change Management program*(/TMWFLOW/SCMA_BTCH_SYNC_TEST)* where we can setup a variant. This is done after adding the new clients in an existing transport group to landscape.
    We have copied this to to Custom Module. When ever a transport moved to Dev usually transport move to QA( Which configured in Task list). We need schedule this program as background job for every 15mins or  what ever is good for you.
    It will transport same.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards
    Bhaskar

  • System Landscape Directory: HTTP response code: 403 (Forbidden)

    Hi,
    After upgrading PI 7.1 (with local SLD) Stack06 -> Stack09 we have the following error in the runtime workbench. It seems that the connection
    between PI and SLD is not working:
    1) error in RWB -
    Error during communication with System Landscape Directory: HTTP response code: 403 (Forbidden)
    2) another error:      
    8 Message(s) : SLD agent unable to specify domain - Error class com.sap.aii.rwb.exceptions.BuildLandscapeException: Error during communication with System Landscape Directory: HTTP response code: 403 (Forbidden) - Attempt to create JCo connection object failed for domain domain.00.hfasapxi1 - Integration Server unable to specify a JCo client - No component names available from Integration Server - SLD agent unable to specify domain - Error class com.sap.aii.rwb.exceptions.BuildLandscapeException: Error during communication with System Landscape Directory: HTTP response code: 403 (Forbidden) - Attempt to create JCo connection object failed for domain domain.00.hfasapxi1
    3) in the sld:
    INFO com.sap.sld.api.builder.app.DefineHostedSystem: Communication exception in SLD ping (HTTP 403 = FORBIDDEN): http://hfasapxi1:50000/sld/cimom, namespace sld/active.
    sldcheck is working and the users are not locked or not valid. All seems to be ok but I still get these errors.
    Any idea ?
    Dimitry Haritonov

    Hi Venu,
    thanks for the answer but it seems to be something else. After searching for that problem I also ran the configuration wizard->PI self registration. This activity registers all the component of the PI, unfortunately it only registered the "integration server" part without the Adapter engine, domain, RWB and etc.
    Also, when I trigger the registration of the adapter engine I get the following error in the default trace:
    The AdatperEngine has not been registered with the SLD due to: com.sap.aii.af.lib.sld.SLDException: Could not register AdapterFramework to SLD. Reason: Self-registration of instance af.xid.hfasapxi1 of class SAP_XIAdapterFramework failed
    the reason is unknown ... any idea ?
    Dimitry Haritonov

  • System Landscape Directory is not accessible

    I am trying to get my end to end monitoring working but every time I try to log in and display it asks for a user and password and no matter which user I try it tells me i have no authorisations...
    So someone suggested that I goto /nwa to implement the template...
    When I go there and put in the user and password it comes up with System Landscape Directory is not accessible.
    Does anyone know why this is? or what can fix it?
    NOTE: It is worth mentioning that the SLD can be accessed by the IR and ID... and I can go on to the SLD directly so I don't understand this issue...

    Hi,
    >>>>Also I am on a PI system so should it be PIISUSER?
    yes
    you can also check for errors from VA
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/09/07/xi-why-dont-start-searching-for-all-errors-from-one-place
    Regards,
    michal
    <a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

  • Need help in configuring CHARM with R/3 System landscape with seven systems

    Hi All,
    we are planning to configure CHARM for our R/3 landscape.our current STMS includes seven systems.in the current STMS the transports flow as below.
                  D20->C20->C21->C22->C23->T20->P20
    we require the transports to move in the same way as stated above even after CHARM is configured
    1.please let me know if we can configure CHARM with seven systems.
    2.if yes, how would the import happen( ie Action for import appears for all systems?).
    Regards,
    Anand Reddy

    HI andy,
    the transports will move in the following order.
    D20(DEV)->C20(Consolidation)->C21(integ)->C22(reg)->C23(unit)->T20(final test)->P20(production)
    transport will start in D20,then imported C20 followed by  C21,C22,C23,T20 imports and finally reach P20
    the systems are not in parallel they are one behind the other
    Anand Reddy

  • CHARM with  a 2 system landscape

    Hello ,
    we have only a 2 system landscape for our ERP systems.
    When I now click on the check button on the maintainance project. I receive an error :
    No consolidation system found for DEV-001 (project TEST_CHARM)
    No track for project TEST_CHARM with log. system P23/001
    Message from function module /TMWFLOW/CHECK_PRJ_CONS: No export system for DEV-001
    TMS ( without any client  routes)
    DEV->PROD
    Any suggestions ?
    Regards

    Hi Daniel,
    we are using CHaRM in various transport landscapes with 2 and up to 5 systems. This is all working fine. Please make sure there is a consolidation transport route from DEV, also all RFC connections from Solution Manager to your Transport Landscape are set up, inlcuding 000 clients.
    TMS settings need CTC=1, and Trusted Services in STMS need to be activated.
    Other prerequsites are:
    - Systems are deined in SMSY
    - Transport Domain link between Transport domain controllers
    - Logical components defined in SMSY (with correct system roles)
    - Lofical component added to SMI project
    If this is all fine, please hit button "Shipment Routes" in SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN in tab page "System Landscape" => "Systems" You should see all transport routes required for this project.
    If this works, you are in a good shape.
    Best Regards,
    Holger Slomka

  • URGENT: Changing System Landscape in ChaRM

    Ok...here is our situation:
    We use ChaRM with a 3 tier system landscape (DEV > USER  >  PROD).
    Out USER system has been down for a month (maintenance) so we went live with ChaRM as follows:
    DEV > PREPROD >PROD
    Our USER system is now back up and running so we have replaced the Logical Component on the project to reflect this.  This has worked ok but the task list is still showing the old system landscape.  i.e. its showing PREPROD still instead of USER.  How do I resolve this?
    Do I have to complete the existing cycle and then create a new one?  This would be fine except I would lose all the jobs I have scheduled in the task list (schedule every 15min EVERY day....took me ages).
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Hi,
    About this issue, there is a detail information about this in blog point 6  u201CChanges in the logical components of a project where Charm is already activatedu201D.
    This is the link:  http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/15116
    So, you have to change the transport route accordingly and then close current maintenance cycle and generate a new one.
    Following is the steps.
    1: please import all the transport requests which were associated in the current maintenance cycle task list by STMS manually import.
    1: change transport route from DEV > PREPROD >PROD to DEV > USER > PROD on the domain controller system.
    2: close current maintenance cycle.
    3: change the system landscape to DEV > USER > PROD in solar_project_admin.
    4: generate a new maintenance cycle.
    Thanks
    Regards,
    Vikram

  • ChaRM in two system landscape

    Hello Everyone,
    I want to implement ChaRM for BIW systems which is a two system landscape: BIWDEV and BIWLIVE . Is it posible to implement ChaRm in a two system landscape /we need three system landscape only for it.I started the ChaRM configuration work but faced certain issues over which i was told tat Charm needs three systems for implementation. Kindly plz suggest and confirm.
    Regards,
    Somya

    Hey Somya,
    2 system landscape will also work with CHARM.
    CHARM can also be configured in single system landscape.
    But the bottomline is you require in all 3 clients to realize charm.
    These three clients can belong to same or diffrent systems altogether.
    For you i would say, u will require 2 clients in BIWDEV system ( Say BIWDEV:100 as development cleint and BIWDEV:200 as Test client ).
    Now you have BIWLIVE system which is our production system, so you require 1 client BIWLIVE system..
    So your 3 clients are ready and Change Request management can be realized..
    Please Reward with points if this postv was usefull..
    Revert For ne clarifications ..
    Regards,
    Suzzane

  • 4 System Landscape // ChaRM // No Export System found

    Hi Folks,
    I got some problems with a 4 system landscape in ChaRM.
    The error message I get when doing a consistency check within my SMI project is:
    Message from function module /TMWFLOW/CHECK_PRJ_CONS: No export system for NWA-303
    Message no. /TMWFLOW/TRACK_N159
    Transport route should be as follows:
    DEV -> QAS -> INT -> PRD
    Since I am still in testing phase I used clients instead of real systems in my configuration (TMS, Logical component,....)
    My configuration looks like this:
    NWA client 300 -> 301, transport layer ZCHM, transport layer SAP, consolidation
    NWA client 301 -> 302, delivery
    NWA client 302 -> 303, delivery
    Logical Component defined as follows:
    Developement System (Source: SAP): NWA:300
    Type of Role: D Source System
    Quality Assurance System (Source: SAP): NWA:301
    Type of Role:  O Target System
    Integration System (Source: User): NWA:302
    Type of Role:  O Target System
    Production System (Source: SAP): NWA:303
    Type of Role:  P Production System
    Anyone got an idea what is wrong? did I miss anything?
    The same configuration works for a 3-tier Landscape (without Integration System).
    Any help is appreciated.
    Thanks.

    Hi Raquel,
    Ours problems with RFC and with connections had be corrected with the note below:
    1833778 - Activate Change Request management - Check error
    Thank you very much!!
    Adriana

  • Charm configuration for a 4 system landscape

    Hi Experts,
    We are planning to implement charm for a 4 system landscape: Development Server, Integration Server, Quality Server and Production Server.
    We could configure TMS related steps, activated Charm in Solution Manager, created a maintenance project in solar_project_admin.
    However, the standard delivered transaction types like Normal correction and Urgent Correction are not working in a 4 system landscape.  They are only working for 3 systems (DEV, QAS and PRD).
    Are there any documents or blogs that would specially explain all the steps required for 4 systems? Any kind of help would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Ravali

    Development --> Integration --> Quality --> Production.
    First, I will import the transport of copies into integration
    Yes, and you test the changes here.
    Second, the whole transport is released and imported to Integration - in the Test phase of the maintenance cycle and NC status being consolidated.
    Third - Now, keeping the maintenance cycle in the TEST phase and NC phase in consolidated, will I be able to schedule the transport into quality server?
    Nope. You consolidate your normal correction, which releases your original transport and import them into Integration, and then immediately into Quality (you already proved it worked in Integration) BEFORE you set the phase to Test. Otherwise the original transports are NOT released. And if you set your phase to Test before importing the originals, you'll get a message that you cannot import transports into Quality during this phase.
    If you need to get transports into Quality for break fixes during the Test phase you need to use a Test Message and these are imported during Go-live as well.
    Fourth - if the above process works, I will then change the MC to Go Live and schedule the import to Production.
    With the corrected process mentioned above, yes, you will then change the phase to Go-live and it will import everything that was brought into Quality. 
    Hope this helps.

  • SolMan ChaRM - System landscape not ready yet

    Hi all,
    We are configuring ChaRM for an implementation use, therefore all the systems are not set up yet.
    Is it possible in SolMan to define logical component without "real" systems ?
    We saw that in STMS it was possible to create virtual systems, but how do we link these virtual systems to SolMan ChaRM ?
    Is it possible to define a virtual system landscape and to build and configure ChaRM scenario with this ?
    Thanks a lot for all your help,
    Regards.

    Yes, it is possible to define a development system and virtual systems (Q- and P-System).
    Via transaction SMSY you can describe the planned Q- and P-System at first as 'virtual'.
    Create transport routes with transport buffers as you would do for existing systems.
    Define the buffers as they should be named in future.
    For experimental purposes we connected our IDES-System to our development SolMan system.
    In this environment we could map such a ChaRM-configuration.
    In the meantime we practiced it in our production SolMan system, too.
    Best regards
    Horst

Maybe you are looking for