Chart component limits the number of views to 20 + Base

We have 20+ vies defined in our OEID application but the Chart portlet only displays 20 + Base view. Is there a reason for this limitation or am I missing something?
I can implement a hierarchical datasource model or rename my views to bubble up the new view but it would be nice to understand the reason(s) for this handicap.
Best,
Kaush

Hi Kaushik - I'd like to understand why you need 20+ views in your application. Views were designed to capture a concept in the data (Customers, Employees, Transactions, etc.) and you could then group and select the metrics you need in the particular visualization's configuration. Are you using Views more like a query library for your components?
Jason

Similar Messages

  • After upgrading to Firefox 8.0.1, now on at least one website I use, it limits the number of characters that I can type in a text box to 275, is there a way to fix this?

    After upgrading to Firefox 8.0.1, now on at least one website I use, it limits the number of characters that I can type in a text box to 275, is there a way to fix this?

    That may be part of the coding that the web page is using.
    *https://developer.mozilla.org/en/HTML/element/input

  • In this iPhone is activated limiting the number of free accounts

    I would like to use on your iphone 4s ICloud, but when I try to run ICloud appears in this iPhone is activated limiting the number of free accounts. What do I do? p.s( Sorry for the broken English)

    Make the accounts on a computer. I believe the iPhone is limited
    to creating 3 accounts.

  • What limits the number of MII connections to Oracle.

    We are using MII 12.0.5 and an Oracle database and are seeing errors in the logs to the effect:
    SQL error occurred on connection jdbc:oracle:thin:@mii001:1527:SMD: code=0, state="null", message="Listener refused the connection with the following error:
    ORA-12518, TNS:listener could not hand off client connection
    The Connection descriptor used by the client was:
    mii001:1527:SMD
    I am ot an Oracle expert and I have not seen this issue before. What is limiting the number of connections? Is this a MII configuration issue that I am not aware of or an Oracle database issue?

    Hello sparks,
    I assume you are getting this error when you are trying to connect to databse while configuring Dataservers in MII,if fo what are the value you passed in the fields PoolMax and PoolSize while connecting to the database.
    Regards,
    Kumar
    Edited by: Sudhir Kumar Shambana on May 6, 2010 10:50 AM

  • Is there any component like the "Enhanced Gird View" of XMLSPY?

    Hi!
    I want to cusomize a XML editor.
    I am looking for any Java based component like the "Enhanced Gird View" of XMLSPY.
    http://www.xmlspy.com/features_views.html
    If you know any component like it, please tell me.
    Thank you!

    JTable?
    [http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/uiswing/components/table.html]

  • Server Administrator has Limited the Number of Items You Can Open Simultaneously

    Over the weekend, we moved all of our room mailboxes over to Exchange. For users who have lots of room calendars open in their Outlook clients, they are getting the error message "Cannot Open the free/busy information. You Server Administrator has Limited
    the Number of Items You Can Open Simultaneously" after the migration from Exchange 2010.
    Restarting the Outlook client temporary fixes the problem, but the problem comes back after they access the calendars again.
    The users impacted deal with a lot of room scheduling, so they have 30+ room calendars open in their Outlook clients.
    I have tried setting up a throttling policy with unlimited RCA connections, but that didn't help.
    I have seen with Exchange 2010 there were some registry keys people were setting on the server that pretty much makes everybody have unlimited connections, but that isn't ideal if's only affecting a few people.

    Hi,
    Since this issue only occurs to a few users, I recommend you disable all the third-party applications on Windows, especially for the desktop search apps. Meanwhile, use Outlook safe mode to disable all the add-ins and check if the issue persists.
    If the issue persists, you need to reset the value of Maximum Allowed Sessions Per User. Besides, we can't set it for only some specified users.
    Here is a thread for your reference.
    Event 9646, MSExchangeIS - Mapi session exceeded the maximum (Note: Though it is Exchange 2010, it also applies to Exchange 2013 about this issue)
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/91922b60-38b7-4af3-ba13-3b44949cc9f7/event-9646-msexchangeis-mapi-session-exceeded-the-maximum-exchange-2010-sp1-w-update-roll-up-2?forum=exchange2010
    Hope this can be helpful.
    Best regards,
    If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • What does knowing the number of "views" tell us about a thread.

    10 Points to the person who can give a cogent, rational, non-apologetic answer to the questions posed below, which are based on the premiss set forth just before it. (Please feel free, if you see fit, to dispute the premiss).
    PREMISS:
    People might "look" at a thread for a whole host of reasons -- whether it be to read the thread and contribute, or just to lurk, or because the thread's title was ambiguous, or funny, or in some other way remarkable apart from any substantive value it may have, or, even, just by accident, because the person clicked on the wrong button and inadvertently "looked" at the thread for a nanosecond before exiting. And probably for other reasons as well.....
    QUESTION:
    In light of the foregoing, what does knowing the number of "views" tell us other than what it says, i.e., does it tell us anything apart from the number of people that have for whatever reason literally just taken a look at the thread?
    If the answer to the above question is nothing -- i.e., the number of "views" tells us just that, the number of "views" and nothing more -- then why is this information so prominently featured, instead of, say, the information that used to be present under the old Discussions system, such as the number of unread posts in a particular thread, which is data that actually has a value as something other than a statistic. Knowing the number of unread posts indicates to someone following a particular thread, whether there has been additional contributions to the thread that should be reviewed if one is to remain current on the substance of that particular discussion. The extent of the additional contributions (if any) are readily apparent from the count).
    The little, difficult-to-discern-on-my-PowerBook's-screen tiny blue dot can hardly be said to take the place of the unread post count, as it shows the same indicator for one new post as it does for ten or even a hundred.
    Thanks for your help with this.

    Hi Scott --
    Thanks for your thoughtful reply. It did help, and I've even marked it "helpful" under the new, bizarre point system to evidence this fact. (BTW, my "offer" of a point award was more a misplaced attempt at sardonic humor aimed at deriding the new point system, with which I have a number of strong disagreements, than it was an effort to bribe thoughtful replies like yours. Please know that I really do appreciate the time and effort you took to get back to me on this and meant no disrespect by the "reward" point bounty).
    That said, I do have one follow up. You write that "the idea behind this [use of "views" rather than number of posts unread] is that even discounting curiosity, boredom, funny title, et al., the number of folks that have looked at a thread should bear some relation to the number of folks who are having that issue."
    I just don't think that that's the case. I don't think it sufficently discounts curiosity, boredom, funny title, et al. Those are some pretty powerful motivations for people to peruse this site. And there are many, many others as well.
    Of course I can only speak with certainty of my own personal experience with the Discussions, but based on that, I know have "viewed" numerous threads on subject matters that not only wasn't I experiencing, but on subject matters that I couldn't possibly experience,because it concerned Mac hardware or software that I don't own or have never used.
    In some cases, I looked at threads where the subject line sounded interesting, or amusing, or provocative, in other cases I looked at threads that concerned hardware or software that I once owned (and so I thought I might be able to help with the problem at issue), in still other cases the thread concerned software and/or hardware that I was considering purchasing (and wanted to know what I might be getting into). With regard to the former of those two reasons, I know there were many, many instances where, based on the title of the post, I knew that I could help and I viewed the post as a form of oversight (so to speak) to make sure that the responses being left were providing accurate and complete information.
    In my "view," though clearly not in the "view" of the Mods, et al. for reasons (thanks to your post) that I can at least better articulate (if not understand or agree with), a thread's number of "views" is susceptible to just too many possible meanings to make it of any real use. The number of unread posts (and by this I refer to the old numeric value of posts not yet read and not that illegible little blue dot used in the new system) may not be perfect information, but it is certainly more useful in my "view" than the number of "views." (I apologize for those poor puns on the word "view," but in my "view" they were unavoidable, sort of. See what I mean
    Anyway. I really do thank you for your reply and the time and effort you took to make it. But, alas, with each hour I use these New Discussions, the more convinced I become that my continued time on here is fading. With no more hope of leveling up, with even less hope of ever receiving any tangible sign of "thanks for your help" in the form of + votes (insignificant as they were, at least they were something, everyone like to feel appreciated), with the posts much more difficult to read on my PowerBook's screen and even more difficult to keep track of, and for a bunch of other reasons (some admittedly petty, and some that strike at the core of why and how I use this site), I fear that I will soon be saying farewell.
    But till then, thanks once again for your thoughtful reply.

  • Limiting the number of files being picked up by the sender file adapter

    We are running a file adapter to collect xml files from a legacy system in a shared network location.  The files are picked up, information is sorted and mapped, and then sent to a proxy on our CRM system to store the data.  Very simple and not-complex.
    Our initial data load will consist of somewhere in the neighborhood of 900k records, which is killing CRM.
    A co-worker with a bit more experience was telling me that he believes there is a way to limit the number of files that will be pulled per iteration of the file communication channel.  If this is the case, can someone share with me the parameters that need to be set?
    My apologies if this is a duplicate post - I have tried to look for a good answer in the forums and have come up empty.
    We are running PI 7.1, and I believe it is SP 6. 
    Thanks in advance for the help,
    Ben

    Hi Ben,
    There is no standard way to limit the number of files to be processed by the communication channel.
    On the Sender File CC, there is a parameter " Maximum File Size" which restricts the files bigger than the specific size, but this is just a prevention not a solution.
    If you have a single big size file, then somehow you have to create small sized files out of it.
    Thanks,
    Pooja Pandey

  • FF currently limits the number of open sessions

    I currently programmatically launch FF on linux using an execl command. In the run string I use the -P option and launch my application by right clicking on the file that has its own mime type and that is opened by my app before the execl call. (my app takes a data file and creates a temp html file that is handed off to FF via execl) I check the system processes for a current running version of FF. If so I add the no-remote option.
    This all works ok. However, if I attempt to launch another copy of my program FF will not allow this even though I am using a tab browser configuration.
    I believe that one session of FF per "user" is acceptable but not the limit of one tab for each user other than the default user. I see my FF configuration eventually having several users as I begin to implement separate security policies for certain websites such as financial, casual, javascript development, no cookies, etc.
    I typically keep well over 20 tabs open, if FF crashes I can loose everything as if the restore fails I must then hunt up each tab that I had open using history.
    Can I get an update on where FF is headed with regards to the maximum number of users windows and the capability to open multiple tabs with a non-default user.

    Sounds like you've got a connection leak - rather than increasing the number of open sessions, you need to constrain the application to use fewer!
    If you don't ensure that the connection is closed even if an exception is thrown after it is opened but before it is closed then you are liable - likely even - to leak connections.
    For example. Bad:
    Connection c = getConnection();
    ... code here ...
    c.close();Good:
    Connection c = getConnection();
    try {
       ... code here ...
    } finally {
       c.close();
    }The same rule applies to ResultSet and Statement objects - and all three should be closed in the appropriate order (make sure you close result set and statement objects before re-using their reference).
    (edit: rephrased ambiguous final para).

  • Limiting the number of users/connections

    We currently have a very large user community (120000)who will be accessing the portal for ESS/MSS functionality.
    We would like to limit the number of users to around 20000. Any more connections should get a nice error message (rather than a standard IE no more connections or a time out message).
    We can obviously throttle the number of connections via the load balancer or via max connections in unix. Is there any method in the Portal itself, that will automatically direct the users to a seperate web page in the event of pre determined number of users/connections being reached.
    I have search high and low but can't find a solution.
    Thanks in advance
    Fenton

    Hi Tim,
    No, there is nothing like this as a standard functionality within the portal. Similar requests are regulary asked on SDN (like: restrict the number of users logging in as you ask, restrict the number of parallel logins of one user, and things like this).
    A possibility would be to implement your own login module which tries to check how many users are online. All techniques - independent if on portal or on WAS side - that try to count this have the problem that they cannot be sure who is "online" as you have no definite information if a user is online or not; one can only use more or less heuristic methods.
    Hope it helps
    Detlev

  • *IMPORTANT* Limiting the number of active threads

    Hi All,
    i have a few of questions so please bare with me:
    1) What is the best way to limit the number of active threads? ie i want to run 10 threads but i want there to be only 3 running at a time.
    this is how im thinking of doing it rite now:
    count = 0;
    while(...)
    thread[count].start();
    while(threadgroup.activeCount > 4){}
    count++;
    2) I have a class that extends thread how do i overide the constructor so that i can add the thread to the threadgroup?
    ok here is an example of what i mean:
    u can do this with a normal thread: Thread one = new Thread(threadgroup, "what");
    this is what i need to do tho:
    class whatever extends Thread {
    public whatever(int a, int b, ThreadGroup tg)
    { what do i put here to make this thread part of the tg threadgroup?}
    thanx for any help in advance and i kinda need a quick answer cause this is due soon , thanx youssefe2k4

    Hi,
    1) Why do you want to do that?
    2) super(tg, "a name");
    /KajIt's part of a homework assignment... I saw another post on this forum and one at JavaRanch where you need to create an application that given a directory will scan each file and report the file name and how many lines are in them... but it must be multithreaded, each thread scan a single file and updates some list and finally you can only have three of these file scanning threads running at the same time...
    Quote "To avoid having too many threads competing for the system resources when there are a lot of files in the directory, we will restrict the number of active Producer threads (active threads are started threads that have not ended yet) during the run time. For this assignment, at any time there should not be more than 3 active Producer threads. If there are already three active Producer threads during the run time, the program should wait until one of them ends to start the next Producer thread."
    I was think about working on it, so that I can strengthen my knowledge in threads...
    I still might do it, just for fun... I don't know yet...
    We will see...
    - MaxxDmg...
    - ' He who never sleeps... '

  • Limitting the number of records in query

    I like to limit the number of records retrieved in the query. I set Query All Records block property to NO, Query Array Size to the number I want to retrieve. Before doing that, I set form Preference - Array Processing checked. The result is form always retrieves all records meets the search condition. Could someone tell me what's wrong with it?

    I do not understand why and what exactly you want to do. The query array size defines the number records your form should fetch at a time, i.e. if you have 100 records in the database and you set the array size to 20, forms will perform 5 fetch cycles to retrieve all records. However, this is transparent to the user and he will see all 100 records. This property is used for performance tuning when working with a large volume of records.

  • Limiting the number of rows returned by SQL or ResultSet

    Hello,
    I'm trying to limit the number of rows that my application receives to a user-specified value. The user is asked how many accounts they want returned and I want to limit my ResultSet to this amount. I'd prefer to set up the SQL to do this if possible rather than waste time returning more records than necessary to the ResultSet.
    If it's not possible to limit the SQL, how can I limit the number when processing the ResultSet?
    Or, is there any way to setup a cursor in JDBC without being able to use Stored Procedures?
    I'm going up against DB2 using DB2Connect.
    Thanks!

    It's not surprising that you are confused because the documentation doesn't bother to explain what the "fetch size" actually is, it just says that setFetchSize sets it and getFetchSize gets it. As I understand it from some other documents I read about JDBC, the fetch size is a number that may be used internally by the JDBC driver. Here's an example of how I understand it (others, I know you will feel free to correct me if you disagree):
    When the driver produces a result set with a very large number of records, it has to generate those records and deliver them to the system that requested them. If the database is not on the same system, then those records must all travel over the network. It could be a performance problem if you had to wait for (say) 80,000 records to travel across the network. Enter the fetch size. If you set the fetch size to 100, then the driver will bring the records across in batches of 100, as the program calls for them. Now, this buffering is transparent to your program; the driver doesn't tell you that it's getting another batch and you can't tell it to get another batch. So it is not a solution to the problem that everybody has here, namely how to display your records 10 per page and allow the user to go back and forth among those pages, like search engines do.

  • Limiting the number of characters in a JTextField

    Hi I have 6 textfields and I don't want the user to enter more than 160 characters in a tet box. As soon as he reaches that limit, it shouldn't accept any more characters, how do I do this?
    One more thing, incase I register 5 textboxes to listen to the same event, how do I make out which textbox generated the event?
    Thanks

    The event generated from the textboxes has a method e.getSource() check that.
    To limit the number of characters extend PlainDocument and override insertString(...) and check the text size if the old size plus text to be inserted < your limit call super.insertString(..) else return.

  • How to track the number slides view on LMS

    Hi,
    I would like to know how to get a percentage of slides view on a LMS platform.
    For example, I don't know how to get a percentage of 5 if I see 5 slides of 100 slides.
    I don't know if it's possible with Captivate and if there is an option for that.
    On our LMS, we get 0, 50 or 100% but we would like to get a more precise result.
    I tried on SCORM CLOUD too and only get 0,00%.
    Do you guys have the solution?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Vanessa
    PS: I'm not native english so sorry if I made some spelling mistakes (I'm French). I wanted to post here because you find more answers on english forums than french forums.

    There is not a SCORM value for slides viewed. What SCORM field/value are you seeing this percentage in?
    Also, what version of SCORM are you publishing?
    You would need to alter the scormdriver.js file in order to post the results that you want. I am in the process of writing a blog to change CP's bookmarking behavior. With this code it would be fairly simple to add some code to display the info in the comments (SCORM 1.2).

Maybe you are looking for