Check Critical Authorization

Hi folks
anyone who can let me know if there is any way to check which users have critical authorizations.SAP Security Audit will be conducted in our organization few days and I'm stuck badly
thanks in advance

you have the option to use standard variant for critical authorization and you can also maintain combinations to get the list with complex criteria

Similar Messages

  • How can i check the authorizations for a query in sap bw 3.1c

    Hi,
    While running one query i am getting warning message is  : you do not have authorization to read object ZVERSION  and few column results also not displaying.
    I would like to check is there any authorization check for this query and could you explain how we use the authorizations in our BW.
    Thanks in advance....

    if you execute su53, the authorization check failed cannot be displayed for reports. because you are executing query in BEx is it?
    for this you can trace the userid that executing query to check the authorization check failed. Go to st01 and find out the authorization check failed there.
    And you can find in RSRT too. i am not sure that.
    One more option is there to check the authorization with help of matrix that you prepared for assigning access/authorization to the users.
    Hope this would help you.

  • Check users authorizations and role

    Hello!
    How can I check the authorizations of
    Web Dynpro application users and also his role.
    Thanks
    rgds
    sas

    HI,
    Pl go through Following link
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/webdynpro/wd%20java/web%20dynpro%20security.pdf
    https://help.sap.com/javadocs/index.html
    use the method isMemberOfRole.
    Regards
    Ayyapparaj

  • Check partner authorization field

    Hello Gurus,
           The check partner authorization field is used to determine which partners are authorized
    to release against a contract. Should no check be performed, you may leave the field blank.
    where to set this check partner authorization field ?
    Many thanks
    Frank

    Hi
    You have to specify the release partners in the Customer master record of the Sold To. If you want to include the Ship To also as the release partner, then in the partner function tab of customer master specify the partner function as AW and give the customer number of the SH. Like wise you can add any no of SH.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • Check transaction authorization

    How to check transaction authorization using
    Z_AUTH_OBJECT_CHECK  function module

    Hi,
    it is not throwing failed authority check error but should work just fine.
        AUTHORITY-CHECK   OBJECT  'A_PERI_BUK'
                          ID      'AM_ACT_PER'      FIELD con_31
                          ID      'BUKRS'           FIELD x093c-bukrs.
        IF sy-subrc NE 0.
    *       WRITE: / text-f08, x093c-bukrs. commented by C5053255
          CONTINUE.
        ELSE.
    *      Rücklesen des eingegebenen Geschäftsjahres pro Buchungskreis
          p_gjahr = sav_gjahr.                                  "> 627533
        ENDIF.
    CONTINUE statement executed in case of failed authority-check causes loop to skip processing for this item ... so only elements for which user has proper authorizations are processed. Try debugging to confirm
    Best regards,
    FS

  • How to check the authorization based on webdynpro application

    Hi Experts,
    I was asked to develop a webdynpro component with two webdynpro applications, one each for internal party and external party to be used.
    So how to restrict or check the authorization based on webdynpro application used?
    Do we have any authorization object like S_TCODE for webdynpro application in roles and authorizations?
    Please enlighten me.
    Regards,
    Ajay Matam

    You can assign an authorization object to the Web Dynpro Application within SICF -
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/61/d93822a88e15489a9391f309767366/frameset.htm
    Of course you could also programatically check which web dynpro application is being used from within the component and then call a custom auth-check. However maintain at the SICF is probably better for visibilty and long term maintenance costs.

  • Check for Authorization object

    Hi All,
    I have a report which will authorize the person running the report.
    I have been given a requirement which is to not accept some users and accept some users.
    Now I know this is possible with authorization object but as I never worked with it so I exactly kind of getting in confusion as to how to go about it.
    Could some one let me know how to go about it. I have few questions.
    1. what is the exact use of authorization object.
    2. I can build in the logic but what all should one start with before going for before implementing authorization object for the report.
    3. I know there is some basis work involved in this but what is that ?
    Thanks,
    Mahen

    Hi,
    In general different users will be given different authorizations based on their role in the orgn.
    We create ROLES and assign the Authorization and TCODES for that role, so only that user can have access to those T Codes.
    USe SUIM and SU21 T codes for this.
    Much of the data in an R/3 system has to be protected so that unauthorized users cannot access it. Therefore the appropriate authorization is required before a user can carry out certain actions in the system. When you log on to the R/3 system, the system checks in the user master record to see which transactions you are authorized to use. An authorization check is implemented for every sensitive transaction.
    If you wish to protect a transaction that you have programmed yourself, then you must implement an authorization check.
    This means you have to allocate an authorization object in the definition of the transaction.
    For example:
    program an AUTHORITY-CHECK.
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT <authorization object>
    ID <authority field 1> FIELD <field value 1>.
    ID <authority field 2> FIELD <field value 2>.
    ID <authority-field n> FIELD <field value n>.
    The OBJECT parameter specifies the authorization object.
    The ID parameter specifies an authorization field (in the authorization object).
    The FIELD parameter specifies a value for the authorization field.
    The authorization object and its fields have to be suitable for the transaction. In most cases you will be able to use the existing authorization objects to protect your data. But new developments may require that you define new authorization objects and fields.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/52/67167f439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
    To ensure that a user has the appropriate authorizations when he or she performs an action, users are subject to authorization checks.
    Authorization : An authorization enables you to perform a particular activity in the SAP System, based on a set of authorization object field values.
    You program the authorization check using the ABAP statement AUTHORITY-CHECK.
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'S_TRVL_BKS'
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'
    ID 'CUSTTYPE' FIELD 'B'.
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
    MESSAGE E...
    ENDIF.
    'S_TRVL_BKS' is a auth. object
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02' in place 2 you can put 1,2, 3 for change create or display.
    The AUTHORITY-CHECK checks whether a user has the appropriate authorization to execute a particular activity.
    This Authorization concept is somewhat linked with BASIS people.
    As a developer you may not have access to access to SU21 Transaction where you have to define, authorizations, Objects and for nthat object you assign fields and values. Another Tcode is PFCG where you can assign these authrization objects and TCodes for a  profile and that profile in turn attached to a particular user.
    Take the help of the basis Guy and create and use.
    Reward points if useful
    Regards
    Anji

  • Authorizations in CRM 2007 - How to check missing authorization objects?

    Hi,
    In our project we are currently busy with the set up of authorizations.
    I did create the necessary PFCG and Business roles.
    For the PFCG roles, I did create all of them by copy of the standard SAP_CRM_UIU_FRAMEWORK so that the user can  access to the web layout.
    Now I need to give authorizations for other CRM objects, my question is: How can I see which objects are missing to displaying or creating activities in the new WEB Layout?
    In the old days we used the SU53 to check the authorization objects that were missing, how can we do it now in this new release? I tried it and didn't worked out.
    Thx
    Regards
    Hugo

    Hi,
    For report CRMD_UI_ROLE_PREPARE you have to input a business role - not a PFCG role. Are you doing that?
    Are you getting no results at all in ST01 or are all results just with return code 0?
    You have to remember to set a filter for your user in ST01 before activating the trace. Another thing to check is if you are using several application servers. I would imagine the trace has to be activated on the same application server as the Web UI. You can change the application sever in SM51.
    /Anders

  • Which routine checks the authorization in ME21N

    My  user was set with M_BEST_BSART. However, even though it prompt to User no authorization for the selected PO document type, it allow User to continue the entry.
    The end result was a PO created but the User cannot delete it because it had no authorization for hprithe document type.
    I had tried to find the routine that checks the authorization of the po document type but i still cannot find it.
    Can someone me to identify the routine that checked it?
    Thanks
    Bye

    I have not done that before.
    How do I do it?

  • I downloaded an album but some of the songs won't play - says my computer isn't authorized to play the song. I checked the authorization, and this computer is authorized. How do I fix this?

    I downloaded an album but some of the songs won't play - says my computer isn't authorized to play the song. I checked the authorization, and this computer is authorized. How do I fix this?

    If just some of the tracks on the album are doing that, that suggests those tracks are damaged.
    If your country's iTunes Store allows you to redownload purchased tracks, I'd delete your current copies of the dodgy tracks and try redownloading fresh copies. For instructions, see the following document:
    Downloading past purchases from the App Store, iBookstore, and iTunes Store
    Otherwise, I'd report the problem to the iTunes Store.
    Log in to the Store. Click on "Account" in your Quick Links. When you're in your Account information screen, go down to Purchase History and click "See all".
    Find the items that are not playing properly. If you can't see "Report a Problem" next to the items, click the "Report a problem" button. Now click the "Report a Problem" links next to the items.

  • Is S_RFCACL a critical Authorization Object ?

    Hi All,
    As we know that S_RFCACL (Authorization Check for RFC User (e.g. Trusted System)) is required for having access to the trusted systems.
    In most of our roles for this authorization Object we have maintained the * value for the following fields:-
    RFC_SYSID
    RFC_TCODE
    This has been made as an observation by the auditors as having this critical access with the users.
    But my question is how can it be the critical access when the user should have id's in both the systems(trusted and trusting) to login to the called system.
    Also even if the user logs into the called system he will only be able to execute the list activities/t-codes that he is authorized to in that system, it will override the * value maintained in RFC_TCODE.
    What possibly could be the risk from this authorization object ?
    Regards,
    Parichay

    Parichay Jain wrote:
    In most of our roles for this authorization Object we have maintained the * value for the following fields:-
    RFC_SYSID
    RFC_TCODE
    This has been made as an observation by the auditors as having this critical access with the users.
    The object itself is certainly critical, but as you stated the trust itself has to have been setup at the system level for the authorization to be going anywhere.
    These two fields are in all honesty only irritating and you can successfully defend putting a * into them.
    RFC_SYSID values for a role means you unit test a role in DEV, integration test in in QAS and then use it live in PROD. Additionally the field RFC_INFO is actually the installation number and you can be fairly sure that will be the same in the landscape. So only adding the pairs of production system IDs means you cannot test the same roles, which is a bit silly.
    RFC_TCODE is even sillier. The generic RFCs for starting transactions (eg. ABAP4_CALL_TRANSACTION) check the transaction code themselves again and that is then user specific roles relating to their job functions. Restricting S_RFCACL additionally in a system role (eg. common role for all users) means that you must double-discriminate against all possible transactions which can be called via RFC and list them all there and maintain the list. But the check happens later again and the application authorizations in the transaction are generally checked as well. Waste of time.
    @ Alex: The RFC_EQUSER = Y field only means that if the calling and called user ID names are the same, then the field RFC_USER is not checked and therefore does not have to be maintained. But it is often misunderstood and the field RFC_USER gets a * value as well (which is where the real music is..) and the EQUSER setting has no further affect. Technically, it actually weakens the authority-check on the user field - which is correct because otherwise you have to maintain it and end up with personalized roles, which is most silly of all.
    So you can quite safely tell you auditor that Julius agrees with you and they are barking up the wrong tree..  :-)
    Cheers,
    Julius

  • Control on Check Buttons Like "Plannin" Check In - Authorization

    Dear All,
    Is there any authorization control or status profile which I can assign to the user, so that a user who responsible for the checkin or planning cant press the Loading start button and so on at shipment document.
    Looking for the gurus response.
    Regards,

    Hi,
    if you check the profile you can set up (with PFCG) for the transaction VT02N (and I suppose now, it is the same for VT01N) you can see that you can control here for each status if the status can be set or even can be reset with this profile. All you need to do is set up different profiles for you users (and assign them).
    Brgds
    Juergen

  • Transaction AFAR doesn't check for authorization

    Hi,
    I've added transaction code AFAR in one of the role that has Check/Maintain for authorization object A_PERI_BUK which should restrict on company code. Ive even check the associated program RAAFAR00 which has the authority chekc statement.
    But, when I restrict the access to a specific company code in the role, the transaction is still allowing the users to execute it with other company codes. User doesn't have any other roles assigned and all the other tcodes such as AFAB, AFBP are giving authorization errors.
    Can some one help!!
    Regards,
    Raghu

    Hi,
    it is not throwing failed authority check error but should work just fine.
        AUTHORITY-CHECK   OBJECT  'A_PERI_BUK'
                          ID      'AM_ACT_PER'      FIELD con_31
                          ID      'BUKRS'           FIELD x093c-bukrs.
        IF sy-subrc NE 0.
    *       WRITE: / text-f08, x093c-bukrs. commented by C5053255
          CONTINUE.
        ELSE.
    *      Rücklesen des eingegebenen Geschäftsjahres pro Buchungskreis
          p_gjahr = sav_gjahr.                                  "> 627533
        ENDIF.
    CONTINUE statement executed in case of failed authority-check causes loop to skip processing for this item ... so only elements for which user has proper authorizations are processed. Try debugging to confirm
    Best regards,
    FS

  • Ultiroute says "Check user authorization"

    My Ultiroute has suddenly started giving me a "Please check your User Authorization" error message when I try to route a board. Ultiboard runs fine, the internal rip-up router seems to be OK, but Ultiroute won't run any more. I can't find any way of dealing with this. The software is Ultiboard 2001 SP2.
    Thanks!

    Hello,
    You should be able to use the same Release Code if your hardware configuration hasn't changed; anyway if for some reason you have issues with this, just use the Online Release Code Generator to get a new code.
    Ultiboard/Ultiroute 2001 are products that we don't support anymore, therefore I won't be able to tell you what caused this error.
    Did the re-install work?
    Are you using a hardware dongle?
    Operating system?
    Ultiboard version (Personal, Pro)? 
    Regards,
    Fernando D.
    National Instruments

  • Where we check the authorization group & authorization object?

    Hi all,
    i have a  std program & tcode  like fb03 . now i want to know the authorization group & authorization object. so where we will check..?
    help me.
    thanks.
    Vipin

    Hi,
    Use transaction SU21 & SU22 for Auth Objects & Class

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to access document properties/attributes?

    Hi folks, I have a document with some properties (File->Form properties) like title, author, description and so on. Now I've read that I can use the xfa.form.form1.desc.title method to access the title. But the only value I get back is [object XFAObj

  • "In Review" app status 4 month - is this possible?

    We have uploaded a total of 11 Apps so far. (First app posted 30 April 2010) There has been only one free App approved and being serviced by Apple. The other ten Apps are still being under review process. It has been almost four months of the review

  • Physical Connectivity from Fabric Interconnect to MDS and Failover please suggest

    Dear Team We have 2 FI and 2 MDS 1 SAN Currenlty the connectivity is 2 direct physical connections from FI-A to MDS1 2 direct physical Connections from FI-B to MDS2 From MDS 1 connection to SAN Primary controller From MDS 1 connection to SAN Secondar

  • Ipages help needed

    Hi, I'm trying to add a cash flow forecast created in numbers to a document I have created in pages.  Any ideas how I can do it? x

  • My iphone's microphone is not working

    My iphone's microphone is not working, I can hear people, but they can't hear me. They can only hear me when the phone is on speaker. Also the phone isn't on warranty anymore, so what should I do?