Check for transaction interface failure from POS to POSDM

Dear experts,
Would like to see if in your experience, you have encountered any report or functions that allow users in POSDM to check if sales transaction from a particular store has failed to do the inbound interface from POS to POSDM?
I am personally not aware of this, so if there is no such report based on your knowledge, would you have any workaround solution that you can suggest me?
Thanks so much.
Dominic

Link for Duplication Check process: http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-47529
Link for info on POS DM: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_posdm/helpdata/en/4e/9617be3aec6ea9e10000000a42189b/content.htm
Hi Dominic,
There are certain validation checks we have in POS DM to validate the transaction data when it comes to POS DM. These validations are like Master Data check, Duplication check, Sequence check for missing transactions and so on.
You can find more about the same in the given link. I don't know my editor is behaving strangely so the link is on the top. I am not able to paste the links in editor links are coming on top. Might be my IE issue.
Regarding implementing such validation in POSDM for incoming transaction you can refer my posted document for Duplication check in POSDM. From this document you will get an idea about how to implement the validation check.
Let me know if you need any other information.
Regards,
Amit

Similar Messages

Disabling authorizations checks for transactions SU53 and/or SU56.

Greetings.
I seem to remember reading that there was either a system profile parameter or a table entry that can be used to disable all authorizations checks for transactions SU53 and/or SU56.
Any truth in this or is my mind playing tricks on me?

Hi,
I guess theres is profile param auth/tcodes_not_checked(I guess thats right), this will exclude SU53/SU56 from checks on transaction code.
This can be done using RZ10 and need to restart the system.
Rakesh

SSO for Transaction Launcher functionality from CRM

Hi,
How can Single Sign-on be enabled when launching R/3 Transactions from SAP CRM? On R/3 system we have integrated ITS.
SSO is working properly for Action Box functionalty from WinClient for same R/3 box from SAP CRM system.
Thanks in advance and regards,
Asheesh

check out this weblog
<a href="https://weblogs.sdn.sap.com/pub/wlg/738">Updated!: Calling a BSP application from a SAPGui Transaction</a>
particularly the Single Sign On of the weblog.
The solution offered will work only if the BSP is called within a HTML control in SAP GUI, you may need to change the logic of using the call_browser
Regards
Raja

Authority-check for transaction SU3 (User Parameters)

Dear experts,
we can not give the authority for transaction SU3 for all users in our seperated HR-System, because the screen numbers of dynpros can be set with parameters and therefore, user could have access to 'wrong' data.
We are looking for a way to give the permission for some parameters only.
Has someone had the same problem and found a nice solution without or with only small modifications?
A new authority-object, ....?
Thank your very much
Johanna

Hi, thank you very much.
I tried to solve the problem with screen variants, but I can only set the whole column of parameter inputs to 'display' and not single fields. Therfore, it doesn't works.
Johanna
Edited by: Johanna Hensler on Sep 8, 2008 12:24 PM

Remove Authorization check for transactions VF03, FB03 and MIR4

HI,
We r using call transaction in BADI. When we r calling through BADI authorisation checks should not happen and allow any user to view the documents for the T-codes VF03, FB03 and MIR4 depending on document type.
Early response is appreciated.
Thanks,
Raju

hi,,
Confimr with Basis team reg the Profile in which partculare authorization object used.
Either inactive that one or make a auth.Obj as per your requirment and assign to role and then user profile.
Check out se54,24,pfcg.
Regrads
ricky

Duplicate Invoice Check for Transaction FB01 or similar transactions

The standard function module FI_DUPLICATE_INVOICE_CHECK will check whether an invoice/credit memo has already been posted where all of the following attributes match: Company code, vendor, currency, document date, reference number (If a reference number was entered in the current invoice/credit memo). If no reference number was entered in the current invoice/credit memo the system checks whether an invoice/credit memo has already been posted where all of the following attributes match: Company code, vendor, currency, document date, amount in document currency.
The above functionality described in the short description doesnt provide for the need within AP to check on duplicate invoices. The functionality in FI differs from the functionaltiy provided in LIV and therefor needs to be aligned. The risk of posting duplicate invoice entry is eminent since the check is dependent on all parameters. For a good duplicate invoice number check we need FI to check on Vendor and invoice reference within the same fiscal year. To modify rules, copy FI_DUPLICATE_INVOICE_CHECK, modify the checks and then call the copied function module from FB60. The remaining field check in the standard function module should be deleted.

Exactly what is my requirement is standard function module checking based on some parameters. In this requirement different way to check this process.

Invoking HR Master Data (P_ORGIN) authorization check for transaction PCP0

Hello,
We have to limit access to executives (managers) sensitive posting data in transaction PCP0 (display posting runs).
Since executives belong to a personnel area other than all other employees, I thought we can achieve this by personnel area distinction.
In order to have this done, P_ORGIN authorization check should be performed.
It looks that by standard, such check is not performed.
Does anyone have any experience of dealing with this issue?
Thanks,
Isaac

Hi,
I have a vague idea.
I remember while creating an ESS user, we did something in P_ORGIN so as to to restrict access to personnel master data.
Check the composite role : SAP_EMPLOYEE_ERP.
A Z role was created for SAP_EMPLOYEE_ERP=>the corresponding roles in it had to be copied to a z role.
Check the z-role created ; zSAP_ESSUSER_ERP.
In Authorizations tab=>Display authorization data option => ;
Expand Human Resources;
In HR : Master data, you can find the various authorization assignments to P_ORIGIN; where
Authorization level (AUTHC)
Infotype (INFTY)
Personnel Area (PERSA)
Employee Group (PERSG)
Employee Subgroup (PERSK)
Subtype (SUBTY)
Organizational Key (VDSK1)
Authorization level (AUTHC) takes the values :
R (Read) for read access
M (Matchcode) for read access to input helps (F4)
W (Write) for write access
E and D (Enqueue and Dequeue) for write access using the Asymmetrical Double Verification Principle. E allows the user to create and change locked data records and D allows the user to change lock indicators.
S (Symmetric) for write access using the Symmetric Double Verification Principle
* always includes all other authorization levels simultaneously
In your case if some has to make changes through PPCO.. it's equivalent to making changes to infotype 0001 (Organizational Assignment)
So, probably, you need the Authorization level to R for Infotype 0001.
I have no personal hands-on experience on this...since we are not allowed to anything Basis
I have seen this being done and have noted what was done... !! May or may not be correct....!!
I hope this is what you want.
Cheers and Good Luck!!
Remi

Duplicate Invoice Check for Transaction MIR7

Hi Experts,
My client requirment is .
Currenty system checks the BUKRS,LIFNR,WAERS,XBLNR,WRBTR,BLDAT for duplicate invoice this is a standard SAP functionality for T.code MIR7.
Logic needs to be changed
Duplicate Check in SAP for Vendor invoices to only check Vendor number (LIFNR) and Reference number (XBLNR).
I have found a function module which is used to through the error message CUSTOM_MESSAGE is the FM under MRM_FI_DOCUMENT_CHECK. advise what can be done for this.
Thanks,
vikas

Hi Nabheet,
BSIP is the table which is used for the Vendor Duplicate invoice check.I can do the validation based on xblnr and lifnr for my requirement but i am not sure where i have to do the validations. Please suggest.
Thanks,
Vikas

Checking for client-side FW from VPN3000

Can I customize the firewall that the VPN3000 checks connecting clients for? Like and I specify a certain executable that must be running to allow the tunnel to be established or do something along those lines?

No, It not possible through VPN300.
Try this link:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/pix3000.html

How to find another BAdi for Transaction CCM2

I have written an Authorisation Check for transaction CCM2, but there are two select buttons.
load and load extended.
i added the Auth Check to BADI_CCM_EXPLOSION - Restrict Structure Explosion for Actual Configuration, which works okay when i click the "load" button, but this is not called on the "load Extended" button
I checked the BAdi - BADI_CCM_EXPL_ALWD - Restrict Structure Explosion of Allowed and Actual Config and BADI_CCM_CHK_STATUS Adjust the CCM2 Check Result by Technical Object but these are not called from the Transaction either.
is there another way for me to try and work what may be called within this transaction?
when i run through the debugger it always short dumps before i get anywhere as it does not like debug mode... any suggestions??? please?

Please skip if you already did this!
Place a break point in method of CL_EXITHANDLER->GET_INSTANCE at line 28, CASE sy-subrc (According to ECC 6.0).
Code looks like:
CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_class_name_by_interface
EXPORTING
instance = instance
IMPORTING
class_name = class_name
CHANGING
exit_name = exit_name
EXCEPTIONS
no_reference = 1
no_interface_reference = 2
no_exit_interface = 3
data_incons_in_exit_managem = 4
class_not_implement_interface = 5
OTHERS = 6.
CASE sy-subrc.--> (Right here)
This METHOD will be called before triggering any BADI in SAP. After you place a break-point just process your transaction for which you are trying a find a BADI. Before triggering every BADI, code will stop right there and you could get to know your BADI Class and Method name through variables CLASS_NAME & EXIT_NAME respectively.
Reddy

IMPORTANT: SQL Developer 1.2.1 Check For Updates Notice

Please note:
The Check For Updates notification yesterday and today (16th or 17th Aug) included a file with a number mismatch. This caused SQL Developer to continue to prompt for new Updates. This is also why a new installation of SQL Developer 1.2.1.32.00 prompted for Updates. This error has been repaired. You can now use Check for Updates to update from SQL Developer 1.2 to 1.2.1.
It remains true that after you have run Check for Updates that you must do a second restart. This is related to the framework and is a known issue.Without the second restart you will not be able to invoke the SQL Worksheet.
We have identified 2 errors that will be addressed, with new updates sent out using Check for Updates as soon as we can. These two errors are that reports with Charts do not currently work, and non-privileged users can't view tables.
The team apologizes for the inconvenience.
Regards
Sue Harper
Product Manager

Hello Sue,
I just proceeded the update on my working machine too.
The version number what I talked about (on this machine) was 1.1.2.25 before and still is the same after the update.
(This is different from my home machine.)
By the way - I had to restart SQL Dev two times before it realized, that it already has the latest updates. One restart still seems to be not enough.
Yes I know that all the extensions has it's own versions.
But for me the question remains: What is the version info under "Help-> About" (in my case 1.1.0.21.) good for? If this number has a meaning - what is it? and if it has no meaning (and only the version number of every single extension is interesting) why does these version number exist at all?
You said: until then I recommend you use the full download.
Question: Is it guarantied, that (at any time) the full download always has all latest extensions ?
Regards
Andre

Lookup for local interfaces.

Isn't lookup for local interfaces allowed from web client. I have defined a
ejb-reference for the bean in my web.xml. When I do a lookup as
TestBeanLocalHome home = (TestBeanLocalHome)
ic.lookup("java:comp/env/ejb/TestBeanLocal");
This statement result in an error
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Unable to resolve
comp/env/ejb/TestSLSBeanLocal/ Resolved: 'comp/env/ejb'
Unresolved:'TestBeanLocal' ; remaining name ''
at
weblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.newNameNotFoundException(BasicNamingN
ode.java:887)
at
weblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.lookupHere(BasicNamingNode.java:219)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.lookup(BasicNamingNode.java:183)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.lookup(BasicNamingNode.java:191)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.lookup(BasicNamingNode.java:191)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.lookup(BasicNamingNode.java:191)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLContextImpl.lookup(WLContextImpl.java:339)
at
weblogic.jndi.factories.java.ReadOnlyContextWrapper.lookup(ReadOnlyContextWr
apper.java:36)
at
weblogic.jndi.internal.AbstractURLContext.lookup(AbstractURLContext.java:124
at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:345)
at jsp_servlet.__client._jspService(__client.java:108)
at weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:27)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java
:265)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java
:200)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServletCo
ntext.java:2495)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.java
:2204)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
The same thing works when lookup is done for remote interface.
Regards,
Rupesh.

You need to use "ejb-local-ref" to refer to local interfaces. I meant
"ejb-local-ref" element was not available in web.xml in Servlet 2.2. They
were added in Servlet 2.3 specification. So unless your app server is
Servlet 2.3 compliant it does not need to support references to local
interfaces in web components (servlets or jsps). Weblogic 6.1 did not seem
to support them last time I tried.
-- Anand
"Rupesh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
what do u mean by local interface in web component? its ejb's local
interfaces and lookups are any way being
done using ejb-ref and ref mapping are given in weblogic.xml.
Where does Servlet spec come into the picture?
Do you mean to say that you can not lookup for local home from a jsp in
WL6.1?
Regards,
Rupesh.
Anand Byrappagari <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Are you using Weblogic 6.1? Then local interfaces in web components arenot
supported. Local interfaces were added only in Servlet 2.3 I think.Weblogic
6.1 is not completely compliant with Servlet 2.3.
-- Anand
"Rupesh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Isn't lookup for local interfaces allowed from web client. I have
defined
a
ejb-reference for the bean in my web.xml. When I do a lookup as
TestBeanLocalHome home = (TestBeanLocalHome)
ic.lookup("java:comp/env/ejb/TestBeanLocal");
This statement result in an error
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Unable to resolve
comp/env/ejb/TestSLSBeanLocal/ Resolved: 'comp/env/ejb'
Unresolved:'TestBeanLocal' ; remaining name ''
at
weblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.newNameNotFoundException(BasicNamingN
ode.java:887)
at
weblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.lookupHere(BasicNamingNode.java:219)
atweblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.lookup(BasicNamingNode.java:183)
atweblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.lookup(BasicNamingNode.java:191)
atweblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.lookup(BasicNamingNode.java:191)
atweblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.lookup(BasicNamingNode.java:191)
atweblogic.jndi.internal.WLContextImpl.lookup(WLContextImpl.java:339)
at
weblogic.jndi.factories.java.ReadOnlyContextWrapper.lookup(ReadOnlyContextWr
apper.java:36)
at
weblogic.jndi.internal.AbstractURLContext.lookup(AbstractURLContext.java:124
at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:345)
at jsp_servlet.__client._jspService(__client.java:108)
at weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:27)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java
:265)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java
:200)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServletCo
ntext.java:2495)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.java
:2204)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
The same thing works when lookup is done for remote interface.
Regards,
Rupesh.

Add-ons - Check for updates doesn't work

Hi
In FF5 i found that the "Check for Updates" and "Update Add-ons Automatically" does not work for plugins. I notice in FF6 that a link has appeared "Check to see if your plugins are up to date".
However i've now discovered that in FF6, "Check for Updates", "Find Updates" (from the right-click menu of a particular add-on) and "Update Add-ons Automatically" did not work for extensions either.
Please see here for evidence https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/862250
My question is - is Check for Updates / Update Add-ons automatically intended to work for either plugins or extensions. If so, has the bug been reported, if not, why is it there?
thanks ...

That is because the creator hasn't uploaded that new version yet to the Add-ons site and if he has done that then the extension still needs to be approved before updating will work.<br />
Such unapproved extension usually appear first on the versions page (e.g. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/speed-dial/versions/) waiting for review, but that hasn't happened yet if this case.
Plugins always need to be updated manually by visiting the website or via an alert from the plugin (Java and Shockwave do that)

What r the conditions that u hav to check for automatic invoice split ( fro

what r the conditions that u hav to check for automatic invoice split ( from order to proforma invoice)

You can find out the exact fields which lead to invoice split in the Data VBRK/VBRP field of copy control between the order and the invoice type at item category level.
Find out this routine.
Go to VOFM tcode and Data transfer-----Billing documents
Here you can see the routine. See the code behind this routine. This will give you the exact criteria used for invoice split in your specific case.
By default,
It is payer, payment terms, incoterms, Billing date
Hope this helps.
Reward if this helps.

Fields in read-only mode for BP transaction in upgrade from 4.72 to ECC6.0

Hello,
This is regarding the query for BP transaction in upgrade from 4.72 to ECC 6.0.
While creating BP / Changing BP system is disabling the fields in compnay code & sales area option. There is a SAP not provided 907860; and specified that the proplem is because of the delta customizing.
All the customization settings are as per the note. And the Synchronization Control is also activated. But still the fields are disabled only.
I have checked the field settings also in Cross-Application-Components & Logistic-Genral.
But these are not working for compnay code & sales area data.
please let me know if anyone has faced this type of problem / found any solution on this.
Best Regards,
Shubhada

SAP IMG -> Cross Application Components -> Master Data Synchronization  Synchronization Control -> Synchronization Control -> Activate Synchronization options
This setting allows you to activate synchronization of BP with R/3. Not maintaining the values may result in certain fields being read-only in BP.
Suggested Values:
Source Object: BP | Target Object: CUSTOMER | Active Indicator : X
Source Object: BP | Target Object: VENDOR | Active Indicator : X
Source Object: CUSTOMER | Target Object: BP | Active Indicator : X
Source Object: VENDOR | Target Object: BP | Active Indicator : X
Have you set all of the above settings??
BHARATH

Check for transaction interface failure from POS to POSDM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for