Check on T-code vl02n

There is a requirement that i have to put a check on T-code vl02n.
If the status of that particular delivery doc is 'C' then if i change the quanity in the additional tab then it should not allow me to change the quantity as the status is 'C' and throw a message.
But if the same delivery doc is reversed then it sholud allow me to change the quanity.
Please help.
Thanks in advance.
Moderator message : Spec dumping is not allowed, search for available information. Thread locked.
Edited by: Vinod Kumar on Nov 3, 2011 3:33 PM

Dear Consultant,
SAP note 32654 explains why the system takes the account
assignment at a higher level for automatically generated lines like
small differences. You should maintain an entry in OKB9 at a higher
level than valuation area, profit center or business area.
You should define a default value in OKB9 at company code level.
This is the highest level and you have to enter a default value as the
note 32654 describes. There are some circumstances where the system
needs this high level default value, and it does not take the one
defined at business area / valuation area / material (profit center)
level.
This particular problem with the system not being able to use
the 'detailed' OKB9 assignment happens when the system creates
an automatically generated line in a document. This is driven by
the transaction key and is then linked to OKB9 by the G/L account
defined for the transaction key. The most common transaction keys
that are used in auto-generated lines are 'DIF' (small diff) and
'KDR' (exchange rate).
The system works as designed because in the above cases, it cannot
decide from which material master it should take the profit center.
I would suggest to either set up an default account assignment at a
higher level (company code level), which is the first screen when
you access OKB9.
Please, let me know the results after changing the customizing
settings accordingly.
Kind regards,
Dr. Ravi Surya Subrahmanyam. PhD (Finance),
Senior Consultant,
SAPs Global Delivery Center,
Answerthink India Ltd
Hyderabad. India
Phone : +91 9848550024
Mail : fico_rss at yahoo,com

Similar Messages

While posting T.code VL02N "co object not found " what have to do

Hi
Friends..
while posting T.code VL02N "co object not found " what have to do
General Ledger related to Co object what i want todo.
showing error " Co Object not found"
Thank you.
Ashok kumar

Hi
Assign a cost centre to the cost element of the general ledger account specified.
Transaction KA02
another option is got OKB9 and assign cost center to GL account at company code level.
regards
Srinivas

Are there any good tool for checking security risks, Code review, memory leakages for SharePoint projects?

Are there any good tool for checking security risks, Code review, memory leakages for SharePoint projects?
I found one such tool "Fortify" in the below link. Are there any such kind of tools available which supports SharePoint?
Reference: http://www.securityresearch.at/en/development/fortify/
Amalaraja Fernando,
SharePoint Architect
Please Mark As Answer if my post solves your problem or Vote As Helpful if a post has been helpful for you. This post is provided "AS IS" with no warrenties and confers no rights.

Hi Amalaraja Fernando,
I'm not sure that there is one more tool that combines all these features. But you may take a look at these solutions:
SharePoint diagnostic manager
SharePoint enterprise manager
What is SPCop SharePoint Code Analysis?
Dmitry
Lightning Tools Check
out our SharePoint tools and web parts |
Lightning Tools Blog | Мой Блог

How to check HTTP response code

Hi,
we have the following scenario:
HTTP -> PI -> HTTP
So it's easy to use HTTP or SOAP-adapter here.
But we have to inform the sender of the message immediately about the successfull delivered message.
So we have to check if response code 200 was sent from the receiver of the message and inform the sender about this.
I can't find any possibility how I can check this in PI 7.1 (neither by using HTTP adapter nor by using SOAP-adapter). There is no acknowledgement mechanism (I can't find any).
Does anybody know how we can solve this?
Thanks for your replies.
Regards
Thorsten

If the response has to travel from Receiver to Sender then you have to make use of SYNC mode of processing or use a BPM.
In Async flow the Sender will get a HTTP 200 OK response from the sender adapter of SAP XI/ PI.
Regards,
Abhishek.

How to check the tran code for specific activity.

Hello friends ,
could you please let me know how to check the tran code for specific activity . AS in table , i can check , what transaction does what ? But now i need to check the transaction for specific activity .
E.g , For Administrator workbench , there is transcation like RSA1 .
thanks in advance
Regards

Hi,
try the TSTC table with SE16.
Hope it helps,
MG

Transaction code KO88 need to be check at company code leval

Dear Experts,
I need maintain authorization check at company code level for the transaction code KO88
Can you suggest what are the better approaches/solutions to meet this requirement
Thanks in Advance
Guru Prasad

Hi,
it does not look like you can use standard authorization objects assigned to this transaction. This transaction is from CO module and this module does not use company codes directly. It uses controlling areas instead. You can see it in authorization object K_VRGNG which is checked in KO88.
It does not look like there is a suitable BADI either. So if you are on Netweaver you can try to use enhancement framework. In program KO71 which corresponds to transaction KO88 is subroutine ACTIVITY_AUTHORITY_CHECK where FM K_VRGNG_AUTHORITY_CHECK is used to check authorization for object K_VRGNG. It looks to me that it's a good point to use implicit enhancement point of this subroutine to add additional authorization check. In your case check for company code attached to internal order. But you need to test it properly and it might work only for this transaction. So if user can start settlement from somewhere else that your additional check might not be performed.
Cheers.

Double Invoice check across company code

Hi All,
I have been trying to use the double invoice check functionality across company codes. i.e. when an invoice is posted in Company code A with ref no: xxx, and when I try to post a new inovice with the same reference ie. xxx in company code B, system does not give error message.
Please note: I have maintained message in application F5, no: 117 and 312.
Also in customization for double invoice check, I have unchecked "Check Company code" and checked "check reference" and "check invoice date"
I have also maintained the double invoice check flag in the vendor master.
Please help at the earliest.
Regards,
Ankush

Hi Ankush,
Good Day,
Duplicate invoice check across company code will not check for FI related invoice ( Like FB60)
But you can able to achive this with BTE ( SAMPLE_PROCESS_00001110 for FI Duplicate invoice check)
Steps for Implementing a BTE
(1)Goto transction FIBF menu Environment->Info System (P/S )
(2)Select the BTE you want to implement.
(3)Press button Sample function module
(4)This brings you to SE37 - Copy the sample function module to a Z-function module (First create a new function group for the function module) . Note: The name of the Z-functionmodule is not important
(5)Edit the code in the new function module
(6)Go back to transaction FIBF - Menu Settings->Products -> Of a customer and create a new product whicj identifies the new product . Remember to mark the Active field.
(7)Go back to FIBF menu Settings->P/S function modules->of a customer - Create an entry that links the BTE and Product with the new function module
Best Regards,
KSK

How to create and transport my own globel check variant for Code Inspector

Hi,
I want to create my own global check variant with Code Inspector, so that I can transport the Variant in other systems, but I can not save my variant whitout registering a SSCR-Key.
Can anybody help me?
Best regards
Marcus

I have solved it myself and will post the solution here soon.

Validation for creating check in T-code FCH5

Hi All,
I have created payment docuemnt t-code F-48.
Then for creating check in T-code FCH5, system allows me to assign different House Bank and Account ID.
How can this be controlled through validation, kindly guide on creating validation for the same.
Thanks

Hi,
In FS00 for bank gl accounts give house bank and account id. By giving this the problem will be solved.
and also check
In OBVCU for bank accounts check combination of house bank,payment method,currency,accoun id and bank subaccount.
Hope it solve your problem
Regards,
Sankar

Transport Organizer Syntax Check using the Code Inspector

dear fellows,
i'm facing a problem when i check the syntax of transport. When i'm using the option to check the syntax within the transaction se01 the system starts no longer the extended check but the code inspector.
is there any possibility to turn this code inspector check off and to get the extended syntax check again?
or on the othe hand, which variant is used for the check and is there any possibility to change the variant that is used?
thanks for your answers,
Robert

Nope... this is SAP standard code so I will reply to the OSS and wait for them to come back to you.
Regards
Juan

Exits for XD02 - Checking of Tax Code

Hi,
Is there any user exit, enhancement or screen exit for XD02, for tab Control Data? Specifically for checking of Tax Codes.
Thanks,
Yanne

Hello friend,
please check the liknk then u can ur self find the exit.
Re: User Exit for MM01
if ur find exit with description u can write the code there.
or small advice to keep break-point and run the tcode and check wheater its triggring......
Thank u,
santhosh

Check Register - T.code FCHN - ZReport

Dear Friends,
I am a Functional Consultant.
The user wanted to have more fields on the standard Report Check Register - T.code FCHN.
So, I checked and found the tables PAYR,EKPO,EKKO,BSEG and related fields necessary for the development of the report.
My ABAPER is asking, how to link all the tables and what is the logic.
Please advise how to proceed?
Regards
MSReddy

Dear Friends,
What you say is correct. But that ABAPer who is regular employee is the blue eyed boy of the IT Dept Head and i am only a consultant.
So, I have to find the tables,logic and he writes the code.
Sad, but true.
Please suggest solution to the query posted.
Regards
MSReddy

Why does it say my coupon code is "Invalid coupon code. Please check the coupon code and re-enter."

When I enter my coupon code to get my serial number it says "Invalid coupon code. Please check the coupon code and re-enter." It is the correct coupon code. And I have just deactivated my lisence on my old computer.

If you had not deactivated it on the old computer and it is a Windows machine there would have been a chance of getting it using Belarc Advisor
(http://www.belarc.com/free_download.html). I do not know if you can still do so.
You can try contacting Adobe support via chat and see if they can help.
Serial number and activation chat support (non-CC)
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service1.html ( http://adobe.ly/1aYjbSC )

Unvoid the checks through T.Code:FCHG

Dear All,
our client has voided some checks through T.Code:FCH3, now they would like to unavoid those checks through T.code:FCHG, but system is not allowing us to unvoid.
We have tried to create the same scenario in our test client, it is observed that T.code:FCHG(Unvoid checks) will be work of check void(cancelled) through T.code:FCH9(Void checks).
If any check void through T.Code:FCH3, and try to do unvoid those checks system is not allowing to unvoid through T.Code:FCHG.
Please let us know, is there a way to unavoid the checks which are cancelled through FCH3.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Prasad

Hi,
Thanks for your help. We were able to resolve this issue through T.Code:FCHE.
Regards,
Prasad

Error message for the T Code VL02N

Good morning gurus,
I have this poblem with the transaction VL02N : when I try to launch an outbound delivery, I get this message: "Item to be picked by WM picking quantity cannot be entered)".
FYI, I enter the stock location and the picking quantity manually.
Thanks for your help!!!

Hi,
In the picking tab : Picked quantity (entered manually) is equal to delivery quantity (which is available in stock as appearent in MMBE)
In Processing tab : Picking - C - fully picked
WM status - - No WM trnsf ord reqd
As for the storage location, it is assigned to a WH and nothing is running in the background.
Thi is very strange to me...
You said that SLoc assigned to a WH and you also said that WM status is "No WM trnsf ord reqd" (VBUP-LVSTA, in our system the text is "Not relevant" for this field if it is empty).
Since your SLoc is asigned to a WH I cannot understand why this status says it's not WM relevant.
If the item would be WM relevant (normally) you would have been not bale to input the picked qty manually...
My further questions:
- Does your material has WM view (for the WH that is assigned to the Plant/Sloc combination)?
- Can you see stock in LX02 for your material (under the SLoc, transaction code LX02)? What can you see in MB52 for the same SLoc? Are the reports in harmony?
- Are you facing the same error if you create a new delivery with the same item where the delivering Plant is the same as well as the SLoc?
- Delete the picked qty and change the SLoc to a non-WM managed SLoc > after that input again the SLoc that is assigned to th WH. What happens (WM status should appear, and picked qtry field should get disabled for manual input)?
I've checked OSS notes, there's only two in connection with this error message, none of them cover your problem (755559, 132767).
Regards,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jan 27, 2009 7:52 PM

Check on T-code vl02n

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for