Checking a number sequence with regular expressions

Hello,
Suppose I have a text in the pattern:
A1=ha,A2=bla,A3=cha,...
I don't know how many sections of "A#=$" (# denotes number, $ denotes text) will be in the text, but I want to verify that the numbers of the A's form the natural ascending number sequence (i.e 1,2,3,...). I prefer to use regular expressions to do this, but if there's another way, I will be glad to hear it too.
Therefore my question is: How can I use regular expressions to check for a sequence of numbers? I know I can search for groups I've caught previously in the expression, but how can I compute the next number in the sequence from the group and search for the result?
Thank you very much!

What I'd do--and I'm not saying this is optimal, just what pops immediately to mind--is have a regex that matches "A(\\d+)=" (assuming the ha, bla, cha can never be "A1" etc.--if they can, you can still do it, but it's more complicated), then you iterate with the Matcher, and each time, you get the Integer.valueOf what you matched. You keep track of the last value, and compare the current to the last. If current is < last (or <= last, depending on your requirements), fail.
Something like this. I don't recall Matcher's methods off the top of my head, so you'll have to fix the details.
Matcher m = Pattern.matcher("A(\\d+)=");
int maxSoFar = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
while (m.matches(input)) {
    int current = Integer.parseInt(m.getMatchedField("$1"));
    if (current <= maxSoFar) {
        // fail
    else {
        maxSoFar = current;
} maxSoFar =

Similar Messages

  • Phone number with regular expression

    Hi,
    is it possible to use regular expression for phone numbers?
    I want to create contacts for companies with several direct dial in numbers. My idea is to make one contact for the company itself with the base telephone number and a regular expression like an asterisk and separate contacts for person inside the company containing the direct dial in number.

    but a third-party app could not tell me who (anybody from the company or a special direct dial in number) is calling me at this very moment. So sounds like no way anyhow.

  • Assistance with Regular Expression and Tcl

    Assistance with Regular Expression and Tcl
    Hello Everyone,
      I recently began learning Tcl to develop scripts for automating network switch deployments. 
    In my script, I want to name the device with a location and the last three octets of the base mac address.
    I can get the Base MAC address by : 
    show version | include Base
     Base ethernet MAC Address       : 00:00:00:DB:CE:00
    And I can get the last three octets of the MAC address using the following regular expression. 
    ([0-9a-f]{2}[:-]){2}([0-9a-f]{2}$)
    But I have not been able to figure out how to call the regular expression in the tcl script.
    I have checked several resources but have not been able to figure it out.  Suggestions?
    Ultimately, I want to set the last three octets to a variable (something like below) and then call the variable when I name the switch.
    set mac [exec "sh version | i Base"] (include the regular expression)
    ios_config "hostname location$mac"
    Thanks for any assistance in advance.
    Chris

    This worked for me.
    Switch_1(tcl)#set result [exec show ver | inc Base]   
    Base ethernet MAC Address       : 00:1B:D4:F8:B1:80
    Switch_1(tcl)#regexp {([0-9A-F:]{8}\r)} $result -> mac
    1
    Switch_1(tcl)#puts $mac                               
    F8:B1:80
    Switch_1(tcl)#ios_config "hostname location$mac"      
    %Warning! Hostname should contain at least one alphabet or '-' or '_' character
    locationF8:B1:80(tcl)#

  • Grouping & Back-references with regular expressions on Replace Text window

    I really appreciate the inclusion of the Regular Expressions in the search & replace feature. One thing I am missing is back-references in the replacement expression. For instance, in the unix tools vi or sed, I might do something like this:
    s/\(firstPart\) \(secondPart\) \(oldThirdPart\)/\2 \1 newThirdPart/g
    which would allow me to switch the places of firstPart and secondPart, and totally replace thirdPart. If grouping and back-references are already present in the Replace Text window, how does one correctly invoke them?

    duplicate of Grouping & Back-references with regular expressions on Replace Text window

  • How to search with regular expression

    I make pdx files so that I can search text quickly. But Acrobat doesn't provide a way to search with regular expression. I'm wondering if there is a way that I don't know to search for regular expression in Acrobat Pro 9?

    First, Acrobat must "mount" the PDX.
    As "Find" does not use the cataloged index, use Shift+Ctrl+F to open the advanced search dialog.
    It may be helpful to first enter Acrobat Preferences and for the Search category tick "Always use advanced search options".
    Back to the Search dialog - use the drop down menu for "Look In" to pick "Select Index" then, if no PDXs show, click the Add button.
    In the Open Index File dialog, browse to the location of the desired PDX and select it.
    OK out and use "Return results containing" to pick a "Match ..." requirement or Boolean.
    To become familiar with query syntax, for Acrobat, it is good to review Acrobat Help.
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/Acrobat/9.0/Professional/WS58a04a822e3e50102bd615109794195ff-7 c4b.w.html
    Be well...

  • Problem with Regular Expression

    Hi There!!
    I have a problem with regular expression. I want to validate that one word and second word are same. For that I have written a regex
    Pattern p=Pattern.compile("([a-z][a-zA-Z]*)\\s\1");
    Matcher m=p.matcher("nikhil nikhil");
    boolean t=m.matches();
    if (t)
              System.out.println("There is a match");
         else
              System.out.println("There is no match");
    The result I am getting is always "There is no match
    Your timely help will be much appreciated.
    Regards

    Ram wrote:
    ErasP wrote:
    You are missing a backward slash in the regex
    Pattern p = Pattern.compile("([a-z][a-zA-Z]*)\\s\\1");
    But this will fail in this case.
    Matcher m = p.matcher("Nikhil Nikhil");It is the reason for that *[a-z]*.The OP had [a-z][a-zA-Z]* in his code, so presumably he know what that means and wants that String not to match.

  • Get the string between li tags, with regular expression

    I have a unordered list, and I want to store all the strings between the li tags (<li>.?</li>)in an array:
    <ul>
    <li>This is String One</li>
    <li>This is String Two</li>
    <li>This is String Three</li>
    </ul>
    This is what have so far:
    <li>(.*?)</li>
    but it is not correct, I only want the string without the li tags.
    Thanks.

    No one?
    Anoyone here experienced with Regular Expression?

  • Help with regular expression to find a pattern in clob

    can someone help me writing a regular expression to query a clob that containts xml type data?
    query to find multiple occurrences of a variable string (i.e <EMPID-XX> - XX can be any number). If <EMPID-01> appears twice in the clob i want the result as EMPID-01,2 and if EMPID-02 appears 4 times i want the result as EMPID-02,4.

    with
    ofx_clob as
    (select q'~
    <EMPID>1
    < UNQID>123456
    < TIMESTAMP>...
    < ADDRINFO>
    < TITLE>^@~*
    < FIRST>ABCD
    < MI>
    < LAST>EFGH
    < ADDR1>ADDR1
    < ADDR2>^@~*
    < CITY>CITY
    <EMPID>2
    < UNQID>123457
    < TIMESTAMP>...
    < ADDRINFO>
    < TITLE>^@~*
    < FIRST>ABCD
    < MI>
    < LAST>EFGH
    < ADDR1>ADDR1
    < ADDR2>^@~*
    < CITY>CITY
    <EMPID>1
    < UNQID>123458
    < TIMESTAMP>...
    < ADDRINFO>
    < TITLE>^@~*
    < FIRST>ABCD
    < MI>
    < LAST>EFGH
    < ADDR1>ADDR1
    < ADDR2>^@~*
    < CITY>CITY
    ~' ofx from dual
    select '<EMPID>' || to_char(ids) || '(' || to_char(count(*)) || ')' multi_empid
      from (select replace(regexp_substr(ofx,'<EMPID>\d*',1,level),'<EMPID>') ids
              from ofx_clob
            connect by level <= regexp_count(ofx,'<EMPID>')
    group by ids having count(*) > 1
    MULTI_EMPID
    <EMPID>1(2)
    with
    ofx_clob as
    (select q'~
    <EMPID>1
    < UNQID>123456
    < TIMESTAMP>...
    < ADDRINFO>
    < TITLE>^@~*
    < FIRST>ABCD
    < MI>
    < LAST>EFGH
    < ADDR1>ADDR1
    < ADDR2>^@~*
    < CITY>CITY
    <EMPID>2
    < UNQID>123457
    < TIMESTAMP>...
    < ADDRINFO>
    < TITLE>^@~*
    < FIRST>ABCD
    < MI>
    < LAST>EFGH
    < ADDR1>ADDR1
    < ADDR2>^@~*
    < CITY>CITY
    <EMPID>1
    < UNQID>123456
    < TIMESTAMP>...
    < ADDRINFO>
    < TITLE>^@~*
    < FIRST>ABCD
    < MI>
    < LAST>EFGH
    < ADDR1>ADDR1
    < ADDR2>^@~*
    < CITY>CITY
    <EMPID>2
    < UNQID>123456
    < TIMESTAMP>...
    < ADDRINFO>
    < TITLE>^@~*
    < FIRST>ABCD
    < MI>
    < LAST>EFGH
    < ADDR1>ADDR1
    < ADDR2>^@~*
    < CITY>CITY
    <EMPID>1
    < UNQID>123458
    < TIMESTAMP>...
    < ADDRINFO>
    < TITLE>^@~*
    < FIRST>ABCD
    < MI>
    < LAST>EFGH
    < ADDR1>ADDR1
    < ADDR2>^@~*
    < CITY>CITY
    ~' ofx from dual
    select '<EMPID>' || listagg(to_char(ids) || '(' || to_char(count(*)) || ')',',') within group (order by ids) multi_empid
      from (select replace(regexp_substr(ofx,'<EMPID>\d*',1,level),'<EMPID>') ids
              from ofx_clob
            connect by level <= regexp_count(ofx,'<EMPID>')
    group by ids having count(*) > 1
    MULTI_EMPID
    <EMPID>1(3),2(2)
    Regards
    Etbin
    Message was edited by: Etbin
    used listagg to report more than one multiple <EMPID>

  • Help with Regular Expressions and regexp_replace

    Oh great Oracle Guru can I can gets some help
    I need to clean up the phone numbers that have been entered in Oracle eBusiness per_phones table. Some of the phone numbers have dashes, some have spaces and some have char. I would just like to take all the digits out and then re-format the number.
    Ex.
    914-123-1234 .. output (914) 123-1234
    9141231234 ..again (914) 123-1234
    914 123 1234 .. (914) 123-1234
    myphone ... just null
    (914)-123-1234.. (914) 123-1234
    I really tried to understand the regular expressions statments, but for some reason I just can't understand it.

    Hi,
    Welcome to the forum!
    I would create a user-defined function for this. I expect there will be a lot of exceptions to the regular rules (for example, strings that do not contain exactly 10 digits, such as '1-800-987-6543') that can be handled, but would require lots of nested fucntions and othwer complicted code if you had to do it in a single statement.
    If you really want to do it with a regular expression:
    SELECT     phone_txt
    ,     REGEXP_REPLACE ( phone_txt
                     , '^\D*'          || -- 0 or more non-digits at the beginning of the string
                           '(\d\d\d)'     || -- \1 = 3 consecutive digits
                    '\D*'          || -- 0 or more non-digits
                           '(\d\d\d)'     || -- \2 = 3 consecutive digits
                    '\D*'          || -- 0 or more non-digits
                           '(\d\d\d)'     || -- \3 = 4 consecutive digits
                    '\D*$'             -- 0 or more non-digits at the end of the string
                     , '(\1) \2-\3'
                     )          AS new_phone_txt
    FROM    table_x
    ;

  • Searching in reverse with regular expressions

    I have recently constructed a "Find" dialog for my editor and would like to support the use of regular expressions (for people who know more about them than I do.) I have radio buttons that allow the user to search down (from the current caret position to the end of the document) or up (from the current caret position to the beginning of the document.)
    I have it working fine with literal text via String.indexOf() and String.lastIndexOf(), but I'm not sure how to implement an "upwards" search using regular expressions. It seems that java.util.regex only provides for searching from the current caret position downwards. Any suggestions?

    two not-very-good-for-big-document suggestions
    1) search up by searching down (from the beginning) to the last match before the position searched from
    2) when the user asks for a search find all matches, number them and keep the index in the doc where they were found, then look up the largest index less than the carets index
    you might try constructing succesively larger strings that end at the current caret position, and matching them one by one. If you're near the bottom, and theres no matches, this is also likely to be sloow..
    asjf

  • Looping through files with Regular expressions ?

    Hi,
    My Question is:
    if i have the following Regular Expression,
    String regrex = "tree\\s\\w{1,4}.+\\s=\\s(.*;)";
    The file in which i am looking for the string has multiple entries, is it
    possible to do another regular expression on the captured group (.*;)
    which is in the original Regular expression ?
    The text that is captured by the RE is of the type "(1,(2,((3,5),4)));" for
    each entry, and different entries in the file have slightly different syntax
    is it possible to loop through the file and first of all check for the presence
    of the original RE in each entry of the file
    and then secondly, check for the presence of another RE on the captured group?
    [ e.g. to check for something like, if the captured group has a 1 followed by a 3
    followed by a 5 followed by a and so on ].
    Thanks Very much for any help, i've been struggling with this for a while!!
    Much appreciated
    The code that i have so far is as follows:
    import java.util.*;
    import java.util.regex.*;
    import java.io.*;
    import java.lang.*;
    import javax.swing.*;
    public class ExpressReg {
    public String Edit;
    public ExpressReg(String editorEx){
    Edit = editorEx; // Edit = JTextArea
    String regrex = "tree\\s\\w{1,4}.+\\s=\\s(.*;)";
    //String regrex1 = "(.*;)";
    Pattern p = Pattern.compile(regrex);
    Matcher m = p.matcher(editorEx); // matcher can have more than one argument!
    boolean result = m.find();
    if(result){                           
    JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, "String Present in Editor");
    else if(!result){
    JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, "String Not Present In Editor");

    if i have the following Regular Expression,
    String regrex = "tree\\s\\w{1,4}.+\\s=\\s(.*;)";
    The file in which i am looking for the string has multiple entries, is it
    possible to do another regular expression on the captured group (.*;)
    which is in the original Regular expression ?Yes, the capturing group is $1 (the only one) referenced in source code as m.group(1).
    m.group() will return entire matching.
    simply use this way:
    String result = m.group(1);
    // your stuff: could be another validation
    The text that is captured by the RE is of the type "(1,(2,((3,5),4)));" for
    each entry, and different entries in the file have slightly different syntax
    is it possible to loop through the file and first of all check for the presence
    of the original RE in each entry of the file
    and then secondly, check for the presence of another RE on the captured group?Again "Yes", no limits!
    Don't need to create another Matcher, just use m.reset(anotherSourceString)..loop using the same pattern.
    Note: Take care with ".*" because regex nature is "greedy", be more specific, eg.: "\\d" just matches digits (0-9).
    Can you give us some sample of "slight difference" ?

  • Match beginning of line with Regular Expression

    I'm confused about dreamweaver's treatment of the characters
    ^ and $ (beginning of line, end of line) in regex searches. It
    seems that these characters match the beginning of the file, not
    the beginning of the various lines in the file. I would expect it
    to work the other way around. A search like:
    (^.)
    should match every line in the file, so that a find/replace
    could be performed at the beginning of each line, like this:
    HELLO$1
    which would add 'HELLO' at the start of each line in the
    file.
    Instead, this action only matches the first character of the
    file, sticks 'HELLO' in front of it, and then quits (or moves on to
    the next file). The endline character $ behaves in a similar
    fashion, matching only the end of the file, not the end of each
    line.
    I've searched, and all the literature about regular
    expressions in dreamweaver seems to indicate that I'm expecting the
    correct behavior:
    www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/articles/regular_expressions_03.html
    quote:
    ^ Beginning of input or line ^T matches "T" in "This good
    earth" but not in "Uncle Tom's Cabin"
    $ End of input or line h$ matches "h" in "teach" but not in
    "teacher"
    Thanks for any insight, folks.

    Hi Winston,
    I am still digesting the material from the regular expression book and will take sometime to become proficient with it.
    It seems that using groupCount() to eliminate the unwanted text does not work in this case, since all the lines returned the same value. Ie 3 posted earlier. This may be because the patterns are complex and only a few were grouped together. Otherwise, could you provide an example using the string posted as opposed to a hyperthetic one. In the meantime, at least one solution have been found by defining an additional special pattern “\\A[^%].*\\Z”, before combining / intersecting both existing and the new special pattern to get the best of both world. Another approach that should also work is to evaluate the size of String.split() and only accept those lines with a minimum number of tokens.
    Anyhow, I have come a crossed another minor stumbling block in the mean time with the following line, where some hidden characters is preventing the existing pattern from reading it:
    o;?Mervan Bay 40 Boyde St 7 br t $250,000 X West Park AE
    Below is the existing regular expression that works for other lines with the same pattern but not for special hidden characters such as “o;?”:
    \\A([A-Z][a-z]*){1,2} [0-9]{0,4}/?[0-9]{0,4}-?[0-9]{0,4} ([A-Z][a-z]*){1,2} St|Rd|Av|Sq|Cl|Pl|Cr|Gr|Dr|Hwy|Pde|Wy|La [0-9] br [h|u|t] \\$\\d+,\\d+|\\$\\d*\\,\\d+,\\d+ ([A-Z][a-z]*){1,}\\ZIs it possible to come up with a regular expression to ignore them so that this line could be picked up? Would also like to know whether I could combine both the special pattern “\\A[^%].*\\Z” with existing one as opposed to using 2 separate patterns altogether?
    Many thanks,
    Jack

  • Extract values with Regular Expression

    How to extract values into [ ] using regular expression.
    With data As
    Select 'AAAAAA[10] AAA: 19C' Txt From Dual Union all
    Select 'XX[450]-10A' Txt From Dual Union all
    Select '[5]AVC19C' Txt From Dual Union all
    Select 'FVD[120]D2AC' Txt From Dual
    )I hope this return
    10
    450
    5
    120Thanks in advanced

    user11118871 wrote:
    Thanks for all.
    Hi BluShadow, can you explain what this is doing!?
    ThanksSure.
    Search for ----------------|           /------- Replace the found pattern in the search string with backreference 1
                         /------------\   /\       (the first thing backreferenced in the search string)
    regexp_replace(txt, '^.*\[(.*)\].*$','\1')
                         |\/\/\--/\/\/|
                         | \ \  /  \ \|
                         | | |  |  | |\- End of string
                         | | |  |  | |
                         | | |  |  | \- Any number of characters
                         | | |  |  |
                         | | |  |  \- Right square bracket (escaped)
                         | | |  |
                         | | |  \- any characters (backreferenced by round brackets)
                         | | |
                         | | \- Left square bracket (escaped)
                         | |
                         | \- Any number of characters
                         |
                         \- Start of stringEdited by: BluShadow on Jun 29, 2009 2:19 PM

  • Need advice on negating a whole string line with regular expression

    Hi All,
    I am not able to ignore / get rid of the following line even though my Java 6 (Windows XP) String Pattern matching has not taken cater for it:
    *% Cleared: 61%*
    Below is the existing Java String Pattern matching in the simple program:
    Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile("(^.*[A-Z][a-z]*){1,2} \\d{0,4}/?\\d{0,4} ([A-Z][a-z]*){1,2} St|Rd|Av|Sq|Cl|Pl|Cr|Gr|Dr|Hwy|Pde|Wy|La \\d br [h|u|t] \\$\\d+,\\d+|\\$\\d*\\,\\d+,\\d+ ([A-Z][a-z]*){1,}.*$");This pattern is working for valid strings.
    The following pattern has included "^(?!.*\.\.).*$" into the existing one but had no luck still:
    Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile("^(?!.*\.\.).*$|((^.*[A-Z][a-z]*){1,2} \\d{0,4}/?\\d{0,4} ([A-Z][a-z]*){1,2} St|Rd|Av|Sq|Cl|Pl|Cr|Gr|Dr|Hwy|Pde|Wy|La \\d br [h|u|t] \\$\\d+,\\d+|\\$\\d*\\,\\d+,\\d+ ([A-Z][a-z]*){1,}.*$)");This picked up other rubbish including "*% Cleared: 61%*".
    I am looking for a single regular expression that applies to the whole line.
    I am quite new to regular expression but has read through Regular Expressions Cookbook (Oreilly - 2009) and is still not familiar with advance functions such as lookahead / lookbehind...
    Your assistance would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Jack

    Hi Winston,
    I am still digesting the material from the regular expression book and will take sometime to become proficient with it.
    It seems that using groupCount() to eliminate the unwanted text does not work in this case, since all the lines returned the same value. Ie 3 posted earlier. This may be because the patterns are complex and only a few were grouped together. Otherwise, could you provide an example using the string posted as opposed to a hyperthetic one. In the meantime, at least one solution have been found by defining an additional special pattern “\\A[^%].*\\Z”, before combining / intersecting both existing and the new special pattern to get the best of both world. Another approach that should also work is to evaluate the size of String.split() and only accept those lines with a minimum number of tokens.
    Anyhow, I have come a crossed another minor stumbling block in the mean time with the following line, where some hidden characters is preventing the existing pattern from reading it:
    o;?Mervan Bay 40 Boyde St 7 br t $250,000 X West Park AE
    Below is the existing regular expression that works for other lines with the same pattern but not for special hidden characters such as “o;?”:
    \\A([A-Z][a-z]*){1,2} [0-9]{0,4}/?[0-9]{0,4}-?[0-9]{0,4} ([A-Z][a-z]*){1,2} St|Rd|Av|Sq|Cl|Pl|Cr|Gr|Dr|Hwy|Pde|Wy|La [0-9] br [h|u|t] \\$\\d+,\\d+|\\$\\d*\\,\\d+,\\d+ ([A-Z][a-z]*){1,}\\ZIs it possible to come up with a regular expression to ignore them so that this line could be picked up? Would also like to know whether I could combine both the special pattern “\\A[^%].*\\Z” with existing one as opposed to using 2 separate patterns altogether?
    Many thanks,
    Jack

  • Search with regular expression like this "[^\(]+mytype"

    I tried regular expression which find me line which has "mytype" but does not precede with "("
    I wrote it like this:    [^\(]+mytype
    It works perfectly with python reg exp. But it does not work in MSVC 2013 search(ctrl+shift+f). Do you know why? Is it bug?
    Is there a way to find variable definition with search function through whole project

    Hi Vit,
    According to your description, you mean that when you use the
    ctrl+shift+f shortcut key to search which line has "mytype" word in the whole project from VS2013 IDE like the following screen shot, but it does not work
    in VS2013 IDE, am I right?
    If yes, could you please provide me a screen shot about how you search the
    mytype?
    Generally, when we used the
    ctrl+shift+f shortcut key to search, it works fine in VS IDE. Therefore, to check if you install some third-party Add-ins impact your VS IDE, I suggest you can search
    the mytype in VS safe mode check if you get same issue.
    Reference:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms241278.aspx
    (1)If you did not get same issue, I doubt that you may be install some Add-ins impact the VS IDE, so I suggest
    you can try to disable or un-install them and then check this issue again.
    (2)If you still get same issue, I suggest you can try to reset the VS setting file or you can try to repair your
    VS check this issue again.
    In addition, I suggest you can try to use Ctrl + F shortcut key to search the mytype word.
    If I misunderstand your issue, please provide me more detail message about your issue.
    Best Regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

Maybe you are looking for