Checking User exits in use
Hi all,
we are moving to ECC 6.0 from 4.6C. I have a list of all user exits. How can i check that these exits are in use or not? Please help.
Regards,
AI.
For checking user exits go to that particular transaction code there in the menu bar go system-----> status
There u will gat the program of that T.code
double click on that one then in the menu bar go to utilities -
> attributes,
Form there get the pakage of thet program
then go to SE80
There in the left and side expand modifications and enhancments in the right side enter pakage name then u will get all the user exits related to that particular tarnsaction
Regards,
Prasad
Similar Messages
-
BAdi or User exit to use in MB26 to avoid posting before saving of mat doc?
Hello Experts,
Can anyone tell me which BAdi or User exit to use in MB26 to avoid posting before saving of material document?
I have requirement to stop posting incase of negative invetory in issuing storag location.
ThanksHello,
The issue is currently we alllowing the negetaive stock at storage location level.At this movement , we want to avoid the negetive stock creation while posting the Mat doc with MB26.Before saving the material document I want check the stock levels in MARD , if the stock levels goes negative from this posting, then I want to stop the document posting.
Thanks -
How can we fnd wich user exit yo use for
hi ABAP masters
how can we find out which user exit to use or a particular requirment.Hello Devender,
The procedure followed is usually by reading the documentation
eg: consider a user exit or BADI definition
We get a hint from the text of the same...if not we refer the documentation given
if documentation is not available we check the signature of the enhancement i.e, which all fields are importing,exporting,which tables can be changed which cannot ....etc
Finally ,if none works out we do what abapers do best
Put a break point and see if it works or in case of BADI ,create a test implementation and see if it works out..
so here is the summary
Check description -> Check documentation -> Check signatures -> debugg/Trial and error
Hope it helped you out
Regards
Byju -
How to handle user exits while using BAPI
HI experts can any one help me on how to handle user exits while using BAPI. Do we need to handle it explicitly or standard BAPI will take care of it??.
Regards,
Hari KrishnaIf you have added some fields using append structures for screen enhancements, then you have to use appropriate user exits to fill these data while calling BAPI. Some BAPIs have EXTENSION structures to fill the custom data which can be processed using user exists or enhancements.
Regards
Vinod -
User exit is used to get incoterms from ship-to-party.
Hi Gurus,
my client needs to catch incoterms from ship-to-party,
please let me know which user exit is used to get incoterms from ship-to-party.
regards,
NarenIn our system we get the inco terms from the ship to party. We use user exit move_fields_to_vbkd in program mv45afzz. The code looks like this:
Inco terms
Added to get the values of Inco Terms from
Ship-To-Party instead of Sold-To-Party.
data: oldship like kuwev-kunnr value space.
if sy-ucomm <> 'UEBR' and "Ordre er ikke oprettet med reference
t180-trtyp <> 'A'. "Der er ikke Vis mode
import oldship from memory id 'ZSS'.
if *vbkd-inco1 is initial. "Første gang vi er i User-Exitet
if kuwev-kunnr <> kuagv-kunnr. "Varemodtager forskellig fra ordregiver
select single inco1
inco2
into (vbkd-inco1,
vbkd-inco2)
from knvv
where kunnr = kuwev-kunnr
and vkorg = vbak-vkorg
and spart = vbak-spart
and vtweg = vbak-vtweg.
endif.
elseif oldship <> kuwev-kunnr and
( *vbkd-inco1 <> vbkd-inco1 or
*vbkd-inco2 <> vbkd-inco2 ).
select single inco1
inco2
into (vbkd-inco1,
vbkd-inco2)
from knvv
where kunnr = kuwev-kunnr
and vkorg = vbak-vkorg
and spart = vbak-spart
and vtweg = vbak-vtweg.
endif.
endif.
Det skal ligge udenfor if-sætningen for at undgå at det overskrives
ved oprettelse med reference
move kuwev-kunnr to oldship.
export oldship to memory id 'ZSS'.
/Torben -
Check user permission level using jquery/javascript
On a sharepoint page I need to check permission level for a user and based on permission level he is having i need to hide few elements on that page.any pointers on how to check user permission level using jquery/javascript.
for eg: i need to do something like this
if(userpermissionlevel=="custom read"){//hide some elements}
Any pointers will be helpful.Try below
function checkifUserHasEditPermissions()
context = new SP.ClientContext.get_current();
web = context.get_web();
this._currentUser = web.get_currentUser();
context.load(this._currentUser);
context.load(web,'EffectiveBasePermissions');
context.executeQueryAsync(Function.createDelegate(this, this.onSuccessMethod), Function.createDelegate(this, this.onFailureMethod));
function onSuccessMethod(sender, args)
if (web.get_effectiveBasePermissions().has(SP.PermissionKind.editListItems))
//User Has Edit Permissions
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/f21ad6b1-445a-497d-a286-d3ba8c2928a6/how-to-get-the-current-user-permission-level-on-a-list-item-with-ecmascript
or
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22122139/check-if-current-users-belongs-to-sp-group-using-javascript-client-side-object-m
http://blog.fidelityfactory.com/2011/11/29/sharepoint-client-ecma-script-check-user-permissions/ -
How to find whether user exits are used in the query or not??
Hi ,
I have to make the list of queris in which user exits are used.
Please any body help me how to find the queries in which user exits are used.
Thanks
MaruthiHi Maruthi,
Using table RSZGLOBV you can find out the queries that have customer exit variables.
Set filter VRPROCTP (processing type) = 3 means customer exit.
and the field COMPID will give you the Query name.
Best Wishes,
Mayank -
How user exit is used to populate the Profit center field in Sales order?
Hi All,
Please let me know :
How the user exit is used to populate the Profit center field in the Sales order?
Please gurus answer as quickly as possible as I require this urgently.Hi,
To derive the correct profit center in the Sales Order, you customize in 0KEM.
Trust this helps much and do encourage our efforts!
Cheers! -
Error for customer specific Authorization check (User Exit)
Dear Experts,
I am facing a problem in PM.
I have created a maintenace plan for calibration via t code IP42 and mentioned the order type PM05. Scheduling is done for the order. I got the order number.
I have released the order and got the inspection lot number.
While entering the results recording through t code QE17, the reluts are out of the specified range, i have given the valuation Rejected, immediately system is giving an error message as below:
"Error for customer specific Authorization check (User Exit)"
Though there is no user exit activated in the system, this message is coming and not allowing the result recoring for rejection.
If I'm entering the result recording within the specified range, then valuation is Accepted and its allowing to save.
I have checked the following user exits:
QQMA0002: QM: Authorization Check for Entry into Notif. Transaction
QQMA0026: PM/SM: Auth. check when accessing notification transaction.
The above 2 User Exits are not active.
I have also checked a note 429066. But it says incase of any dump for that user exit only its applicable and more over the current version of the system is ECC 6.0 packae 15, where as that note is applicable upto 4.6C.
Please some one help me on this issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Praveen.Dear Pete,
I have cheked with my technical team, There is no hotpacks updated recently. This is the implementaion project I'm in, so performing the cycle for the first time.
Any how I got it solved, in T code QE17, after entering the Inspection lot in next screen goto menu path Settings - User settings - Defects recording mention the reprt type and tick on Reprt type Changable.
At the time of result recording if the valuation is Rejected then it ask for defects recording close that window if not rwequired then save, the error message no longer apperaing now.
Regards,
Praveen -
Availability checking user exit at sales order level
Hi ,
Is ther any availability Check user Exit at the sales order level?
1)I want to make Confirm quantity to zero in the sales order level
2)The block confirmation is set to VBEP-BMENG to "0" for each item where VBEP-LIFSP =Z1
Is ther any related USEREXIT in the sales order to make confirm quantity to ZERO
(VBEP-BMENG=0)
Ragumay be you can try putting some logic is MV45AFZZ in USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBEP
or in the exitSDTRM001 - Reschedule schedule lines without a new ATP check.
Regards
Sai -
Which user exit to use in Fixed Assets?
You should have Funds Management implemented and integrated with Asset Management to understand this problem.
Create an asset (AS01) and while doing that notice that you dont see a "Derive Again" button in the Time-dependent tab. Save and Exit. Now got to AS02 and then to Time-Dependent tab. Now you see a "Derive Again" button at the bottom.Click the Derive Again button, you see that the Fund and Fund Center are automatically derived. Save it.
Now my question is - Is there any user exit/bte through which I could automatically populate the Fund and Funds Center once the asset record is created. ( instead of manually going to AS02 and clicking the Derive Again button every single time. Because it doesn't make any sense for us to tell the end user to do that manually every time)
Appreciate if you could throw your ideas in detail. By the way we are using ECC 6.0
R@viDear Ravi,
Check the following one's,I hope this can help you.
AAPM0001 Integration of asset accounting and plant maintenance
AFAR0003 External changeover method
AFAR0004 Determination of proportional values for retirement
AINT0004 Change amount posted for certain areas
AINT0005 Dummy for extended syntax check. Do not use.
AISA0001 Assign Inventory Number
AIST0001 Exchange number range in master data maintenance
AIST0002 Customer fields in asset master
AMSP0002 Determine relationship type for two company codes
TRAN0001 User exit for asset transfer
Regards
Mangalraj.S -
Rule based ATP Check - User Exit to modify the item
Hi all,
We are working with standard rule based ATP check to change the plant in the Sales Order item.
That creates a new subitem with the new plant determination, and changes the Item Category of the original item.
My doubt is: Is there any User Exit in this process to do the system change something else in the Sales Order items?
<< Moderator message - Please do not offer points >>
Thanks!!
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 8, 2010 2:20 PMHi Roger,
Please clarify more what do want to change exactly example any Z field to be copied from main item to sub item.
You can use exit USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP , USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAK
Thanks,
Pavan Verma -
What user exit to use in F110?
Hi everyone!
In F110, I need to check if Posting Date used is equal to Run Date.
What user exit should I use to write this logic?
Thank you!hi,
try these exits put break-point and check.
FDTAX001 Enhancement to Transaction FDTA (event after the download)
FEDI0002 Function exits for EDI DOCS in FI - Incoming pyt adv.notes
FEDI0003 Function exits for EDI docs in FI - Save PEXR segments
FEDI0004 Function exits for EDI docs in FI - particular events
FEDI0006 Function Exits for EDI-docs in FI: Save IDCR Segments
RFFOX003 Frame for user exit RFFOX003 (in program RFFOM100)
RFFOX041 Framework for user exit RFFOX041 (in program RFFOBE_I)
RFFOX042 Framework for user exit RFFOX042 (in program RFFOBE_E)
RFFOX043 Framework for user exit RFFOX043 (in program RFFOBE_D)
RFFOX061 Frame for user exit RFFOX061 (in program RFFOCH_P)
RFFOX062 Frame for user exit RFFOX062 (in program RFFOCH_P)
RFFOX063 Frame for user exit RFFOX063 (in program RFFOCH_P)
RFFOX064 Frame for user exit RFFOX064 (in program RFFOCH_P)
RFFOX065 Frame for user exit RFFOX065 (in program RFFOCH_P)
RFFOX066 Frame for user exit RFFOX066 (in program RFFOCH_P)
RFFOX071 Frame for user exit RFFOX071 (in program RFFOCH_U)
RFFOX072 Frame for user exit RFFOX072 (in program RFFOCH_U)
RFFOX073 Frame for user exit RFFOX073 (in program RFFOCH_U)
RFFOX074 Frame for user exit RFFOX074 (in program RFFOCH_U)
RFFOX075 Frame for user exit RFFOX075 (in program RFFOCH_U)
RFFOX081 Frame for user exit RFFOX081 (in program RFFOF__T)
RFFOX082 Frame for user exit RFFOX082 (in program RFFOF__T)
RFFOX100 Frame for user exit RFFOX100 (in program RFFOUS_T)
RFFOX101 Frame for user exit RFFOX101 (in program RFFOUS_T)
RFFOX102 Frame for user exit RFFOX102 (in program RFFOUS_T)
RFFOX103 Frame for user exit RFFOX103 (in program RFFOUS_T)
RFFOX105 Frame for user exit RFFOX105 (in program RFFOUS_T)
RFFOX200 Frame for user exit RFFOX200 (in program RFFONZ_T)
RFFOX210 Frame for user exit RFFOX210 (in program RFFOAU_T)
RFFOX211 Frame for user exit RFFOX211 (in program RFFONZ_T)
RFFOX230 General program for user exit RFFOX230 (in program RFFOJP_L)
RFFOX240 Enhancement for User Exit 240 (RFFOAT_P)
RFFOX250 Enhancement for User Exit 250 (RFFODK_E)
RFFOX901 Framework for user exit RFFOX901 (in program RFFOM100)
RFFOX902 Framework for user exit RFFOX902 (in program RFFOM100)
RFFOX104 user exit
thanks. -
Problem with User exits when using custom fm
Hi everybody,
I am processing an IDoc using fm IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM. Nos I had to copy this to Z_...
And this fm has a sun-routine that calls User-exits. When I am using the standard fm, the UEs are being checked for active and executing the logic in the UE. But when I am processing IDoc using Z_...fm, the system is checking if the UEs are active. Its also active and now the cursor is coming to CALL CUSTOMER-FUNCTION '014'. But here when I press F5 in Debug, the cursor moves to the next statement after this function call without executing the user- exits. I dont know why its not executing the UE.
Is there any setting that I need to make?
thanks in advance
krisHi Vamsi,
User exits are specific to the object they are included in. So when you have a "CALL CUSTOMER-FUNCTION '011'" in IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM and when you have "CALL CUSTOMER-FUNCTION '011'" in your Z function module, they are two different things.
The purpose of a user exit is that you can include your logic in there within the limits defined by the object and without repairing the system. If you copied it, then you don't need the user exit anymore, as that copied object is your custom object and you can incorporate anything you want within main source code itself. If you really thing you should have that user exit, then double click on the call function statement, the system will ask if you want to create the function module, say yes and proceed with the creation.
But I don't see any reason why you will copy a standard IDOC function module(while you could have used a user exit in there) and still want to use the user exit functionality. Once you copied, it is your object and you don't need a user exit to insert code into your own object.
Hope this is clear.
Srinivas -
Updating VBAP line information in user exit when using VA02
HI All
I am trying to update the values of VBAP-CHARG in user exit form USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT for all line items. But i am unable to update the values though it gets reflected in xvbap.
Kindly help me in this.
thanks and regards
shilpaHello Shilpa,
At the point where this userexit is called the data has already been sent to the database (in update task) hence any changes you do to the internal tables are not reflected on the database. If you want to change the data of the internal tables e.g. xvbap use the userexit USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE instead. This is called before the data is posted.
Regards,
Michael
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi, I am unable to install new itunes version to windows 7 PC. It requires application support and gives windows error 2. I have tried to save on desktop and run as administrator but errors remains, what other options do I have?
-
How to install visual basics for iMac?
HOw do I sinstall visual basics for iMac?
-
LCD TV 55HT1U lags with game systems
I'm am having an issue with my LCD TV 55HT1U. It has about a 1 or 2 second lag with my PS3 and xbox 360. Is there any way I can fix this issue? I am running both with HDMI if that helps. I've also noticed that regular cable TV has a delay.
-
Inconsistent Query Result in SEM-BCS using Virtual Info Provider
We have just upgraded to BW 7.0 and SEM-BCS 6.0. When we run an existing 3.5 BW query for BCS through the Virtual Info Provider against the basic consolidation cube, we are getting inconsistent results. Sometimes we get the correct result, and other
-
the speed of books&spoken is after sync twice times faster than normal. can someone explain who to deaktivate this please ? thanks