Chief position for User

Hi Experts,
I am getting error in SWI2_DIAG transaction , There is no chief position for User,
But i checked the organisational structure under User path, already Manager is there & this Manager is flagged as Head of organisational unit, so manager becomes chief in position.
Please give your valuable feedback to resolve the issue.
Thanks

Hi ,
Are you using process controlled or application controller workflow?
Regards
Sam

Similar Messages

Two Chief Position for an org unit

HI,
In PPOM I am unable to view two chief position for an 'X' org unit. I have checked in other 'Y' org. unit ( having similar attributes) and there two chief positions are displayed. The validity period and other relationship in both the org units are same.
Can any suggest on how the two cheif positions are displayed for X org unit. (The client is stating that when Y org unit can display two chief positions then why not X org unit).
Thanks,
Sai

Hi Sai -
What is the error or message that you are getting?
By default SAP allows an Org Unit to have multiple Chiefs assigned to it. Are you able to manually assign the relationship to that position via PO13?
If you send over the message, then I can further assist.
Thanks,
Nick

User without the Chief position in org id to view the resources under him.

Hi,
The requirement is:
A person who is playing the role of a crew leader should be able to fill the time sheet of his crew. This person will not be given the chief position for the org id that he is tagged to. There will be different person who will be tagged to the chief position and will be playing the role of a manager.
I want to understand, what exactly needs to be done in MSS for the crew leader to fill his team's timesheet ?
Regards,
Rukmani

As such in MSS we have self services in general information page, where manager can enter details for his employees which are determined by evaluation path who reports to him which is again configurable done using OADP
In your case make a new evaluation path for the user so that he can see which employees are assigned to him not necessarily he has to be a manager
refer all information here
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=190743879
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/2e/5a5d45d9f24fbdb06be2ff53651c3e/frameset.htm
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=104006108

Restriction for only one chief position per organizational unit.

Hi
Customer insists of having not more than one chief position in each org. unit.
Is there any way that the system will block or give a warning while I am trying to mark an additional chief position for an org unit ?

Hi Zeev,
you need to create a user exit.
Aranka

Org Unit with more than one Chief Position

Hi,
we have implemented MSS via the portal using a one-to-one relationship between Org Units and Chief Positions, and we would now like to have multiple Chief positions attached to one Org Unit.
As far as I can tell from the SAP documentation, this should be straightforward, but the results we are getting do not seem correct.
I have an Org Unit that has position 1 and position 2 assigned to it with relationship A/B 012 denoting that they are Chief Positions.
User 1 is holder of position 1 and user 2 is holder of position 2.
Both users have the same security roles.
The views used on the portal are configured using the MSS Object and Data Provider functionality, using the standard ORGEH view, evaluation path for root objects SAP_MANG and evaluation path objects SBES. The checkbox 'Excl. Managers' is ticked.
The problem is this - both users can see all the subordinate employees in the Org Unit when they log on to MSS but user 1 can also see user 2 in his list of employees, which is not correct as user 1 and user 2 are both chiefs. User 2 cannot see user 1 in his list of employees, which we would expect.
The only logic we can see for user 1 being able to see user 2's details is that user 1 must be somehow defined as the 'superior' Chief Position, but we have not defined this as far as we know.
Any ideas as to why this is happening for us?
Many thanks,
Fran.

Hi Fran,
Sounds like you have set up the reporting structures and MSS properly. I do question why two chiefs for one org unit. As you stated, both can see all employees and so both can approve time, give pay increases, etc. without the approval of the other. If this is want you want, then you have set it up properly. Usually, one has to approve the actions of the other, thus, is in a superior relationship. This can be handled by having a higher level new org unit with the higher person as chief and the lower stay as head of the lower org unit which reports to it.
As you have it now, both individuals have the same rights and access. They should both be excluded from iViews if you checked the "Excl. Managers" box. Since, you just recently made one a manager, have you checked for any date dependencies? If the Chief #1 is selecting a view for "Current Year", for example, he would be able to see all persons who reported to him for this year, which includes Chief #2. There are no 'superior chief' designations (except by structure), so without being able to view your configuration, my suggestion is to check all dates for the assignments and relationships vs. dates of the view.

Assign Chief Position to custom OM Object Business Unit

Hello
Is it recommended or doable to assign chief position via 012 relationship to the top most custom object Business Unit. Currently the chief position relationships is for Org Units. We would like to keep Chief Position to OU, also if possible to create similar 012 relationship to Business Unit. Since Business Unit will have one-to-many relationship with Regions, need is to identify chief position for the Business Unit for reporting purposes.
Evaluation path for Business Unit - Region - OU - Position - Person.
Thank you.

yes, in om structure it will be seen as top most OM object business unit (top most) region --> o.u. --> position --> person. Can I use 012 relationship of position assigned to top most business unit and keep 012 position relationship to OU.?
Narrowing down. Currently, chief position relationship is assigned to top OU that is tied to region 1:1 relationship. Now with the new top most custom object business unit has many regions. So need to identify top most region tied to business unit via 012 position.
Is it possible and how?

Multiple position for one central person and one user

Dear Guru's,
I have a requirement to create multiple position for a existing User - which already has CP Central Person and S Position.
How to create this new position and assign the same CP to all the new positions ?
Thanks and regards,
Anil Rajpal

Hi
Yes you can definitely do this
Create the new position and assign the CP to this position in transaction PPOME. You may find the position first there in PPOME, and then drag-drop the CP over the position to make the assignment. System will ask the percentage of responsibility.......which you will ve to enter...
Regards
Virender Singh

Distinct boxes for chief position in Org Chart

Hi,
Is it possible to change the icons and the colours of the org chart boxes for line managers only (i.e. chief position or A012)?
What config is needed to make this change?
Thanks,
Vibhu

Hi Vibhu,
It is possible to these. For the icons you would need to write some code in the XSL file for the section that controls the icons. You can find the name of the XSL against the first section name in the detail presentation configuration in AppResources.xml. To change the box colour you need to find the detail configuration for the view and find the main presentation XSL for that view and amend that with some code.
I hope that helps! Sorry I can't be more precise but it depends on your current configuration and what you are trying to achieve.
All the best,
Luke

Difference between Relationship A/B002 (Reports to) and Chief Position?

Hi Everyone,
What is the difference between relationship A/B002 (Position X reports to Position Y) as opposed to everyone in the same org unit reporting to the chief? What is the difference between these 2 types of reporting relationship? If both the relationship exist at the same system, what does the system recognizes?

Hi Lee,
To   Get the managers id from HRP1001, where the employee with
     object id (p0001-plans) reports to(A-002) a managers id - v_mangid.
check the following code snippet***************
IF NOT p0001-orgeh IS INITIAL .
    SELECT SINGLE sobid
                  FROM hrp1001
                  INTO v_sobid_1
                  WHERE otype EQ c_o
                    AND objid EQ p0001-orgeh
                    AND rsign EQ c_a
                    AND relat EQ c_002
                    AND plvar EQ c_plvar
                    AND istat EQ c_istat
                    AND begda LE sy-datum
                    AND endda GE sy-datum
                    AND sclas EQ c_o.
    IF sy-subrc = 0 .
      SELECT SINGLE sobid
                    FROM hrp1001
                    INTO v_sobid_2
                    WHERE otype EQ c_o
                    AND   objid EQ v_sobid_1
                    AND   rsign EQ c_b
                   AND   relat EQ c_012
                   AND   plvar EQ c_plvar
                    AND   begda LE sy-datum
                    AND   endda GE sy-datum
                    AND   sclas EQ c_s .
      If the above statement is successful.(i.e if the employee has a manager)
      IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
        SELECT SINGLE pernr
            FROM pa0001
            INTO v_pernr                                    "wa_pa0002
            WHERE plans EQ v_sobid_2
            AND   begda LE sy-datum
            AND   endda GE sy-datum.
        IF sy-subrc = 0 .
          SELECT SINGLE
            nachn
            vorna
            FROM pa0002
            INTO (wa_output-reportsto_last_name , wa_output-reportsto_first_name)"wa_pa0002
            WHERE pernr EQ v_pernr
            AND   begda LE sy-datum
            AND   endda GE sy-datum.
        ENDIF.     " End of IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
   ENDIF.
or even u can check this FM too.
To find Level 1, Level2, Level 3 Reporting Manager for an employee.
Pernr--> Leve1 Manager --> Leve2 Manager --> Leve3 Manager .
   Use Function Module RH_STRUC_GET by passing positions.
OR You can Use this scenario also.
For fetching Level 1 manager, there are 2 options:
                      1.You can use FM RH_GET_LEADER for PERNR,Position or User
                      2.Use FM RH_READ_INFTY with Subtype = A008.
For Fetching Level2 manager,
                      1. Fetch Level 1 manager.
                      2. Get Level1 manager's Org.
                      3. Get Level2 manager using FM RH_GET_LEADER.
Try this ...
Regards
Rohini Devi B G

Insufficient SQL database permissions for user 'Name: NT AUTHORITY\IUSR SID: S-1-5-17...

Hi,
I have a customized SharePoint page that takes user input data, validate some of the data, then writes the data to a SharePoint list. If an exception occurs, it will write the error to the ULS.
All was working well in the test environments.
However, recently we noticed that in the QA environment, when it's trying to write to ULS, it causes another issue:
Insufficient SQL database permissions for user 'Name: NT AUTHORITY\IUSR SID: S-1-5-17 ImpersonationLevel: Impersonation' in database 'SP_F1_Config' on SQL Server instance 'SQL01'. Additional error information from SQL Server is included below. The EXECUTE
permission was denied on the object 'proc_putObjectTVP', database 'SP_F1_Config', schema 'dbo'.
I've traced through the code and found that it fails on the line:
SPDiagnosticsServiceBase.GetLocal<LoggerError>();
where LoggerError is the logger class inheritng SPDiagnosticsServiceBase
I have also googled around today, but the most positive solution provided
on this page was to manually modify SQL object permission, which I believe we should not do, and would not be supported by Microsoft.
So the questions are:
Why is AUTHORITY\IUSER used for SPDiagnosticsServiceBase.GetLocal()? Should that account actually be allowed to access SharePoint databases? (This is an intranet environment and using claim based/Windows authentication, no no anonymous access would be allowed
anyway).
I've checked the Application Pool account permissions in SQL, comparing the environment that works and the one that doesn't work, and the permissions/roles/schemas look identical on server and database level. Where else can I check?
On the environment that works, I logged on as SharePoint administrator, created a new SharePoint Visual Web Part solution in Visual Studio, just to test writing to ULS. Then I press F5 in Visual Studio to debug it. It also has the same problem.
It just seems like somehow the user's identity (or whatever the identity SharePoint required) was not passed to SPDiagnosticsServiceBase.
Any suggestions, or even better, solutions would be really really much appreciated!

Hi，
Thanks for your sharing, it will be userful to the people who stuck with the same issue.
Best regards
Patrick Liang
TechNet Community Support

Need 2 Multiline elements for user decision step

We are on SAP R/3 Enterprise version.
I have this requirement to find agents based on the agent type and work center field. So I created a responsibility rule for each type of agent type. The responsibility rule is keyed on the work center, and HR positions are mapped to each responsibility rules work center field.
We have 50 agent types/responsibility rules, 60 work centers, and 1 or more positions for each agent type and work center combinations. Due to the total number of positions, I prefer to use 1 responsibility rule per agent type for ease of maintenance.
I have a FM that reads the responsibility rule based on the agent type and work center field and retrieve the agent_list. I used this FM/method/step prior to my user decision step and pass the agent_list to the UD step via container.
In my user decision step, the Other tab does not have Multiline element for me to enter my agent_list. So I cannot use &agent_list[&_WF_PARFOREACH_INDEX&]& in my user decision agent assignment expression field.
In my last job, we have SAP ECC 5.0, the UD step has a Misc tab that has Multiline element, but our current SAP R/3 Enterprise version does not have Misc tab, it only has Other tab.
Question:
1. How do I use [&_WF_PARFOREACH_INDEX&] without Multiline element for agent_list in UD step?
2. I have to use the same way to retrieve my LED_agent_list as well, so I need 2 Multiline elements in my UD step. But normally in Other tab, it allows you to define only 1 Multiline element. How do I get around this restriction?
3. My last resort is to use 1 responsibility rule, then I can use the rule in the agent assignment. If that is the case, is there any limit on the number of entries in the rule?
Thanks.
Amy

Sorry, I posted to the wrong forum.

Using Rule 168, SWX_GET_MANAGER and Chief Position

We have enabled standard SAP Travel Workflow WS20000040 - Approve Trip. We are not currently using OM relationships A002 (Reports Line to) or B002 (Is Line Supervisor of). We currently identify the Line Manager of the employee using the Chief Position designation A 012 and would like to use this for Trip approvals in lieu of building all of these additional relationships.
Rule 168 is bound to the workflow. According to the documentation associated with the rule, it seems that the rule should work with either the A002 or A012 relationship. However, we only seem to be getting a superior identified when relationship A002/B002 exists.
Are there additional configuration or parameter settings that we might need to consider to make the manager (agent) determined properly exclusively with the Chief Position assignment?
Thanks for any guidance you can provide.
Regards,
Edited by: Bruce Hull on Jul 24, 2008 5:37 PM
Edited by: Bruce Hull on Jul 24, 2008 5:37 PM
Edited by: Bruce Hull on Jul 24, 2008 7:29 PM

What I found through trial and error is that rule 168 does indeed evaluate the A012 relationship by default with no change in the standard evaluation path. In our testing system, the "Chief" postion was not properly assigned. Once this was resolved, the workflow works properly.
As a side note, I also learned that you must have the parameter WFLOW VAPOS set for the rule to properly look up the organizational structure when a position (and chief) are vacant.

ORA-13754: "SQL Tuning Set" "" does not exist for user "SYS"

While calling dbms_stats.seed_col_usage I got the following error. Can someone help me on how to resolve it
sqlplus
SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.1.0 Production on Thu Apr 14 14:37:38 2011
Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Enter user-name: / as sysdba
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.1.0 Production
TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
SQL> show user
USER is "SYS"
SQL> begin
2 dbms_stats.seed_col_usage(null,null,400);
3 end;
4 /
begin
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-13754: "SQL Tuning Set" "" does not exist for user "SYS".
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SQLTUNE_INTERNAL", line 17379
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STATS", line 28451
ORA-06512: at line 2
Thank You
Sarayu

According to the documentation:
SEED_COL_USAGE ProcedureThis procedure iterates over the SQL statements in the specified SQL tuning set, compiles them and seeds column usage information for the columns that appear in these statements.
Syntax
DBMS_STATS.SEED_COL_USAGE (
sqlset_name IN VARCHAR2,
owner_name IN VARCHAR2,
time_limit IN POSITIVE DEFAULT NULL);>
It looks like you need to provide a SQLSET_NAME and OWNER_NAME to use this procedure correctly, to which you've provided NULLs. I don't see any exceptions in the documentation that indicate special processing when NULLs are provided.

OM evaluation path showing chief position and subordinates

Hi experts, is there any standard OM evaluation path showing the reporting structure in Org chart like this?
                 OU
                   I
                Chief
          _____I_____
          I                 I
    Position         Position
if there is no standard evaluation path, do I need to create extra relationship like S A002 Chief to every position??
What else solution would you suggest??
Many thanks!!

Your drawing (and last message) indicates a relationship between O and "Chief" and between "Chief" and S (Position). As others have mentioned, this is not SAP standard - and to me it doesn't make sense either. The chief position (A12 relationship) and the regular positions (A003 relationship) all belong to the same org.units don't they?
For your need you would actually have to create your own "Chief" object type, make your own relations and your own evaluation paths. I would strongly advise against this. What is the business need for this requirement?
In PPOME you can move the manager (chief) position so it is the first position in the in the Org.Unit. This will give a better visual of the org.sturcture. Also, check the priority field in the relationship, and check the documentation for this.
Hope this is of some help.

Is there a range of error codes reserved for user defined error codes?

I would like to create my own error codes for a CVI dll but I want to make sure I don't use error codes already defined for something else. Is there a range reserved for such use?
Samee thing for warnings (errorcode > 0)
Thanks

I have never found a positive mention of a "safe" range of error codes available for user-defined error conditions, but I can suggest you some source of informations.
First of all, every library has its specific list of error codes, usually listed in the relative include file. All these error codes are listed in the online help too (search for "error codes" in the index tab of the help).
Second, GetGeneralErrorString () is a function that can be used to trap errors of the following libraries with a unique error function:
User Interface Library
Easy I/O instrument driver
Toolbox instrument driver
ActiveX Library
DIAdem Connectivity Library
.NET Library
DataSocket instrument driver
Network Variable Library
Real-Time Utility Library
TDM Streaming Library
UDP Support Library
This means that the error codes from this libraries do not overlap, so you could derive from its code some ranges not used by these libraries.
Nevertheless, there is not a single function for error trapping: every library has its proper list of error codes and a function to decode them in human readable form, andthere is no guarantee that these ranges does not overlap. It's up to you to trap errors from every function in the proper way.
Proud to use LW/CVI from 3.1 on.
My contributions to the Developer Zone Community
If I have helped you, why not giving me a kudos?

Chief position for User

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for